A bling Pegasus life

“Stylish developments for the over-60s are springing up all over Britain. They have swimming pools, saunas, spas and a carer on tap. They don’t come cheap – but they’re a great alternative to a care home.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3532816/Penthouse-pensioners-Concierges-cocktails-place-moor-yacht-Granny-flats-going-glam.html

Luxury care home with cocktails. And how long before these people start complaining about the oiks and “little people” enjoying what will remain of the Knowle parkland?

“The 1% hide their money offshore – then use it to corrupt our democracy”

” … What have the super-rich got for their investment in British politics since 2010? Cuts in personal taxes, invitations from George Osborne to advise on overhauling corporation taxes, the security of knowing that their tax havens will be treated with due leniency.

In my politics lessons, we were taught that Britain was a representative democracy. But what 30 years of plutocracy have brought is an era of un-representative democracy.

With a few exceptions, our politicians no longer resemble, nor do they work for us. Amid a crisis in the rental market, you have a housing minister, Brandon Lewis, who runs a private rental portfolio. You have a former investment banker, Sajid Javid, now claiming to do his best by the steel industry. And you have a super-rich prime minister who vows he’ll take on tax havens, all the while blocking any serious attempt to do so.”

http://gu.com/p/4t8t8

900 sandbags on Exmouth seafront

Hope Moirai build in storm resilience at their Exmouth development – otherwise they will have some very unhappy people to answer to!

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/900-sand-bags-laid-Exmouth-ahead-high-tide/story-29085272-detail/story.html

“Tory local government leader asks Lords to block housing reforms”

“The Conservative leader in local government is urging peers to vote against the government on a number of key amendments to David Cameron’s housing bill amid fears it could force more people into homelessness.

In a letter to the Guardian, Cllr David Hodge – leader of the Tories at the Local Government Association (LGA) – warns that elements of the bill being debated in the Lords this week could have the “unintended consequence of increasing homelessness and pushing more families into the more expensive private rented sector”.

Hodge has teamed up with his Labour and Liberal Democrat counterparts to ask members of the House of Lords to try to block legislation that would force councils to sell their most expensive properties in order to fund the government’s Right to Buy policy.

“At a minimum, we urge peers to back amendments that allow councils to retain enough receipts from every home sold to be able to replace it in the same area,” they write.

They have also raised concerns about the government’s starter homes scheme, which means that one in five properties in new developments will be available to first-time buyers under 40 at a 20% discount.

Critics say that only middle or higher income earners could qualify for those homes, and yet developers will be able to classify them as “affordable”.

“Current proposals for starter homes carry a risk that a crucial supply of new affordable rented homes will be displaced, and despite 20% discounts they will still be out of reach for the majority of people in need of an affordable home,” write the local government leaders.

A number of the amendments have been laid down by LGA president and former head of the civil service, Lord Kerslake. “The amendments are trying to do three things,” he said. “To make it a fairer bill, so that it is not transferring resources from social housing for rent to ownership. To make it more localist. And to make it more workable. The numbers do not add up.”

The peer said he wasn’t against ownership but argued that for many people it was simply out of reach.

But the housing minister, Brandon Lewis, said the policies were intended to help people realise their ambition to own a home. He told the Guardian that 86% of people still aspired to homeownership.

“The hardest hit part of the housing market was first-time buyers and we are very clear that we want to increase supply but also ownership,” said Lewis, who argued that a 20% discount on an average property did make it much more affordable for ordinary people. He also argued that councils could still push for developments to include other forms of affordable homes on top of the government’s new scheme.

Those against the plans believe that starter homes are out of reach for the poorest. Campbell Robb, Shelter’s chief executive, said: “By building homes for people on middle to high incomes, the government is redistributing existing resources away from those on low incomes. This will have a massive impact on ordinary families being priced out of the dream of owning their own home, and millennials faced with expensive and unstable private renting, or living with their parents well into their 30s.”

http://gu.com/p/4t8g2

Neighborhood Plans: Parliamentary Briefing Paper and Consultants’ Paper

Parliamentary Briefing Paper March 2016

Click to access SN05838.pdf

The report referred to:

Click to access Turley_%20Neighbourhood%20Planning_March_2014.pdf

Tax returns

Owl looks forward to seeing the tax returns of senior councillors and officers and is sure … well, almost sure … well, hopeful … that none of them have offshore accounts on Treasure Islands … or magnificent properties beyond their pay grades in London or warmer climates.

“Developer tries to stop ‘anti-housing’ councillor from voting

Story in today’s Times, page 29:

Babergh Council, Suffolk. Developers Knight Developers threatened to take legal action as the accused a councillor of being “ideologically opposed to greenfield/greenbelt development” and having an “ideologic hostility to developers and the planning system as a whole”.

Amongst other things, the councillor was said to have made a Twitter comment saying “Write to your MP to stop the bulldozer and the concrete mixer shattering our country life”.

He is also alleged to have said “Wake up everyone. Did you know that local government financing is now predicated on a bribe to build more new homes threatening our village life”.

The developer said that he should be stopped from voting as he was “incapable of considering the proposals objectively”.

The councillor said “It shows that developers will take any step they can … to interfere with democracy”. … It is my prerogative and duty to comment on policy. I have been consistently against the New Homes Bonus which totally distorts planning procedures and is going to be another poll tax for the Conservatives in the countryside.”

The council ignored the threat and the councillor voted, though the application was eventually approved. Villagers are considering a judicial review.

Reminder: Exmouth seafront poll – most polling stations ( but not all) announced including new ones

What a disgrace that new polling stations have been announced but no-one gets polling cards to know where they should go to vote.

And how can you justify saying you will announce another polling station next week?

The poll arrangements are ludicrous and might merit a complaint to the Electoral Commission. Not to mention being examined at an Exmouth Town Council or EDDC scrutiny committee.

Poll approaching on Exmouth seafront

More information has been released about an upcoming parish poll, concerning redevelopment plans for Exmouth seafront.

It will ask voters to answer ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to the question ‘Should Exmouth Town Council recommend to East Devon District Council that before any further planning applications are approved with regard to the Queen’s Drive development area, that additional independent consultation should be carried out in addition to that required by the applicant and the Local Planning Authority?’

East Devon District Council is proposing new buildings and leisure facilities between the old lifeboat station and The Maer.

The poll was requested by Exmouth resident Malcolm Dodd and nine other electors, and was supported by a show of hands at the annual town meeting last month.

Mr Dodd is said to have sought advice from East Devon Returning Officer Mark Williams on what would be an acceptable question for the poll.

The outcome of the poll is not legally binding on the town council or the district council, which may decide not to take any action.

The poll will take place on Wednesday, April 20, between 4pm and 9pm. All Exmouth residents who are on the electoral register can take part in the poll.

Residents are reminded that no polling cards will be sent out and that there will be no facility for postal votes.

People will need to attend their usual polling station where the polling station staff will ask them for their name and address to check that they are registered to vote. They will then be given a ballot paper to complete.

Any Exmouth resident who is aged 18 and over and who was registered on the electoral register by March 16 this year is eligible to vote.

The polling stations are at All Saints Church Hall, Brixington Community Church, Clayton House Community Centre, Holy Ghost Church Hall, Littleham Community Hall, Palmer House, St John The Evangelist Church Hall, and Withycombe Rugby Club.

There are also two new polling stations at Littlemead Methodist Church, Roundhouse Lane, and The Kennaway Centre in Victoria Road.

Details of one further polling station are awaiting confirmation and will be publicised next week.

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/election-2015/poll_approaching_on_exmouth_seafront_1_4485164

Hugo cuts ribbon for the company that rents his constituency office to him

The Carter family were very enthusiastic members of the East Devon Business Forum.

The Carter family owns the offices that Hugo Swire rents for his constituency work along with Greendale Business Park and many other local landholdings and investments.

Hugo Swire cuts the ribbon for the completion of refurbishment work at Ladram Bay, owned by the Carters.

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/mp_hugo_s_ribbon_cutting_date_marks_10m_facelift_1_4485032

More Hinkley C information

From: stophinkley.org

Hinkley Point C – The Story So Far

Every so often, it may help Stop Hinkley members to have a recap of where we’ve got to and how we’ve got there. I hope this helps to outline developments.

EdeF first proposed a third nuclear power station at Hinkley Point over eight years ago. Not surprisingly, with the Department for Energy & Climate Change backing new nuclear, they obtained planning permission in 2013.

Since then, everything that could go wrong for EdeF has gone wrong. The European Pressurised Water Reactor chosen for the project has proven to be virtually unconstructable in China (Taishan), Finland (Olkiluoto) and France (Flamanville). Reactors there are years overdue and hugely over budget.

Despite agreeing a deal with DECC to supply electricity at £92.50 * per Megawatt, three times the current price, index linked and guaranteed for 35 years, the only other reluctant investors are Chinese. Reluctant because they are only interested in HPC as a lead in to building their own reactor at Bradwell in Essex. British investors have walked away from a deal that looks gold plated and the deal is the subject of a Legal Challenge by Austria to the EU. * Because the £92.50 is index linked it is already up to £99.00

In addition to funding Hinkley C, EdeF have to find 55 billion euros for post Fukushima improvements to their 58 nuclear reactors in France. Their financial situation is so grave that their Finance Director, Thomas Piquemal, resigned because he could not persuade his CEO, Vincent de Rivaz, that EdeF should drop HPC. This resignation followed that of the HPC Project Director to spend more time with his family in America.

EdeF has been reduced to pleading with the French Government, which owns 85% of the company, to find a way of funding Hinkley C so that it can make its Final Investment Decision (FID), something it has delayed than ten times over the last three years.

That Decision has to be approved by the Board of EdeF and it is now apparent that at least the Union members are likely to oppose going ahead with HPC. Even their own nuclear engineers are reported to have expressed doubts about the reactor design. Hardly surprising when the French nuclear safety regulator is unhappy about the steel used to construct the pressure vessel at Flamanville and is demanding further testing.

In the absence of the FID, nothing is happening on the site. EdeF have completed the site preparation work and removed most of the asbestos waste from the ‘A’ station which has been dumped on the HPC site. It would be amazing if EdeF could build HPC by 2025, even if they started now. Yet Amber Rudd, Secretary of state for Energy and Climate Change, now appears relaxed about keeping the lights on without HPC.

Stop Hinkley continues to monitor EdeF’s attempts to move forward, as they would call it. The good news is that the public seems increasingly aware that HPC would be very expensive to build, is an unproven design and would add to their electricity bill.

If the FID gives HPC the green light, Stop Hinkley will mobilise members to protest as we have before.

Stop Hinkley Newsletter April 2016

Download printable version: http://stophinkley.org/Newsletter/16AprNL.pdf

Hinkley Point: Pressure grows at EDF

A board member at French energy firm EDF has said he will vote against its plan to build a new nuclear reactor at Hinkley Point in the UK. Christian Taxil, who represents the CFE-CGC union on the board, said conditions were “not right” for the £18bn project.
More: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35925637

Row over ‘secret’ Hinkley Point documents set to reach tribunal

An 18-month battle to discover the true cost to consumers of building the Hinkley Point C nuclear reactors is to come to a climax in London. The information commissioner has been blocking freedom of information requests to publish subsidy documents held by the Department of Energy and Climate Change. However, it has finally agreed to hold an oral hearing on the issue. More: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/mar/20/secret-hinkley-point-documents-set-for-hearing.

Last month, Stop Hinkley member Jo Smoldon wrote to the Japanese government of her concerns about the ongoing disaster in Fukushima. We would encourage others to do the same. Please write to the Embassy of Japan at 101-104 Piccadilly, London W1J 7JT

Read Jo’s letter here: : http://stophinkley.org/1603Jo2JapEmb.htm

Stop Hinkley Members Activities

February and March has been a very busy time. Here are a few examples of what happened-: http://stophinkley.org/EventsReports.htm#2016FebMar

The Stop Hinkley AGM is on May 16th. Please let us know if you will be able to come admin@stophinkley.org We look forward to seeing you then.

2015 figures show the growth of green energy in the UK

The latest government statistics revealed that a quarter of all our power needs came from British sunshine, wind and rain last year. It’s a testament to our world class renewable resources that clean, green generation is now a major player in UK energy.

More: http://www.goodenergy.co.uk/blog/articles/2016/04/01/2015-figures-show-the-growth-of-green-energy-in-the-uk

Events

Stop Hinkley meetings third Monday 18 April & AGM 16 May at 7pm. West Bow House, Milton Place Off West Street, Bridgwater

Contacts:

Press & Spokespersons: Pete Roche:
pete@stophinkley.org
01749 860767 or 07821 378 210

Local Information: Allan Jeffery
ajjeffery@talktalk.net
01278 425451

Street Stalls:
Jo Smoldon:
josephine.smoldon@virgin.net
01278 459 099

Membership/Treasurer/Website:
Val Davey: val@stophinkley.org

Gremlins emerging in EDDC relocation plans

True to form, EDDC’s relocation project is not going entirely smoothly.

Wednesday’s Cabinet meeting (6 April) showed cracks already appearing, which the Leadership seemed to merrily paper over.

Long-term Exmouth councillors’ criticism of the planned design of their Town Hall renovation was treated with apparent amusement by Leader Paul Diviani and Chief Officers, Mark Williams and Richard Cohen.

Steve Gazzard (Lib Dem) said the proposed design was not flexible enough, a view echoed by his Tory counterparts, who complained of the “inadequacy of the space to be provided”, and were unhappy that “ all the memorabilia” has had to be taken down. They were also shocked at the possible prospect of having to book, or pay rent , for use of the Council Chamber.

Richard Cohen agreed that “Memorabilia is an issue”, and acknowledged the need for “an organised booking system”, and for what he called “the odd gremlin to be ironed out”. But he had no response to an exasperated Cllr Pauline Stott (Con, Exmouth), whose question showed that rather more than gremlins are involved.

It was proving very difficult, she said, to find alternative premises for staff obliged to move out so the Exmouth Town Hall renovation work could be done. (Estimated time 8-10 months, at a cost of £1m) .“How are YOU getting on with finding somewhere to move out to? I’m wondering if you have found somewhere to move out to?” she repeated.

The proposals for the Honiton newbuild office were criticised, too, with Cllr Peter Faithfull (Ind, Ottery) finding them seemingly “small and cramped”. We have no measurements..of what we are getting”, he said.

And Cllr Jill Elson (Con, Exmouth) was astonished that there was no staff café included in the Heathpark designs. Once again, this was treated as a joke, with Cllr Philip Skinner interjecting that there was always the nearby burger bar!

And Leader Paul Diviani’s remark that they were not using “stellar architects” for the new building, added no reassurance for those anticipating sound investment for public money.

More on that last point coming soon..

Who guards the LEP guards? Owl has the answer!

As part of the government’s assurance framework, each local enterprise partnership has a nominated local authority that acts as its accountable body, and

Somerset County Council

(the Council) is the accountable body for the Heart of the South West LEP.

Alternatively you may bring any matter concerning the LEP to the attention of the Somerset County Council’s external auditor.

For this Council, the appointed auditor is

Grant Thornton UK LLP.

The engagement lead for the audit is

Peter Barber
peter.a.berber@uk.gt.com
0117 305 7897.

For Local Authorities, some rules are in this government publication:

Accounting Officer Accountability System Statement for Local Government and for Fire and Rescue Authorities”

Click to access 150320_-_LG_and_Fire_Accountability_System_Statement_-_2015__final_.pdf

For the Local Growth Fund, this government publication covers some of the rules:

Accounting Officer: Accountability System Statement for the Local Growth Fund”

Click to access bis-15-183-Accountability-systems-statement.pdf

Should you as an elector wish to examine the accounts of ANY local authority, the National Audit Office has produced a very helpful guide abour your rights:

Council accounts: A guide to your rights

Click to access Council-accounts-a-guide-to-your-rights.pdf

Hinkley C: definitely maybe but then again, maybe not …

“Ségolène Royal ducks question of whether £18bn UK nuclear power development will be halted as discord over troubled venture continues at EDF”

The French energy minister, Ségolène Royal, has said that a postponement of the Hinkley Point C nuclear power project was still under discussion.

In a French television interview on Thursday, she was asked whether Hinkley Point would be postponed.

“It’s still under discussion,” Royal replied. “There’s an agreement between France and Britain, so things should go ahead. But the trade unions are right to ask for the stakes to be re-examined.”

Asked if she was in favour of a postponement, Royal ducked the question and said she would not make rash comments.

However, the minister added that while she did not want to “decisively throw the project into question just like that”, there should be “further proof” that the £18bn venture was “well-founded” and would not affect investment in renewable energy.

Scrapping Hinkley for renewable alternatives would save ‘tens of billions’
EDF, the energy company controlled by the French government, has still not made a firm commitment to build the new nuclear power station. Its board is expected to make a final decision on the project at its next meeting on 11 May.

Last week an EDF board member called for Hinkley Point C to be postponed, in the latest sign of discord at the top of the French energy company over the troubled project.

Christian Taxil, an employee director, said a raft of changes to the Somerset reactor scheme agreed over the past three years significantly raised the risk for EDF.

The dissent follows weeks of behind the scenes bickering and the resignation last month of EDF finance director, Thomas Piquemal, despite continual promises from EDF chief executive Jean-Bernard Lévy that the controversial project will go ahead.

EDF has been hit by falling power prices, cost overruns on other projects, and demands to upgrade French nuclear reactors to make them safer. Its Paris-listed shares are down by almost 60% over the past 12 months.

The company is being compelled by the French government to buy the reactors division of Areva, which is also state-controlled.

Areva’s European Pressurised Reactor (EPR) technology is slated to be used at Hinkley Point. However, the first power station to use it – which is being built in Finland – is running nine years behind schedule due to problems and cost overruns. The problems had left Areva virtually bankrupt after four years of losses.

Concerns about the EPR technology has also delayed EDF’s construction of another EPR reactor at Flamanville, on France’s west coast. Its budget has gone from €3bn to €10.5bn and it is running six years late.

Building two new nuclear reactors at Hinkley has been heavily backed by the UK government in order to keep the lights on in Britain. The last of the UK’s coal-fired power stations will be closed in 2025.

Simon Taylor, a specialist in nuclear financing and a lecturer at Cambridge University, said last month that the Hinkley project appeared to be “poor value for money” and it would be best if the French government abandoned it.

“It would preserve the rest of the nuclear options in the UK, as it would not cast any doubt on the UK’s underlying commitment,” he said. “But if the UK cancels the project it could jeopardise all the other projects in the pipeline.”

http://gu.com/p/4t79n

Rural schools could become second homes …

Rural schools are at risk of closing and being turned into second homes under the Government’s forced academies programme, Westcountry teachers warn.

Delegates told a conference the controversial scheme could be the “final nail” in the coffin for many schools and was a major threat to village life.

Members of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL) said small rural schools are the “glue” that bind communities together, allowing young parents to carry on living where they grew up.

Sutcombe primary school in Devon was earmarked for closure last month after dwindling pupils and the failure to join a federation made it unviable.

There also fears for the future of Farway Church of England primary, in Farway near Honiton, after pupil numbers dropped.

“Speaking at the ATL annual conference in Liverpool, Joyce Walters, a teacher from Devon, said the “cost of forced academisation” could be “the final nail for many rural schools that means that they will no longer be able to stay open.”

She said: “Like many churches, chapels, barns, pubs and shops, too many rural schools are now large, beautiful and – very often in Devon – second homes.

“Rural schools are the sticking glue and the epicentre of rural communities.

“Because the parents of those children work, play and shop in those areas, where they may well have grown up themselves and have probably extended family.

“And they need to be able to stay there and they need a rural school in that area.

“Help rural communities and their children and their schools across our very beautiful green and pleasant land to continue to thrive and prosper well into the future.”

Since 2011, primaries at Pyworthy, Dalwood and West and East Putford – all in Devon – have closed.

All schools will be forced to become academies – or be in the process of converting – by 2022, meaning local authorities will no longer run them.

ATL said multi-academy trusts will be unwilling to take on rural schools because they are expensive and inconvenient to run, meaning some may have to close.

This would mean young families moving out of villages, leading to the closure of pubs and shops, union members warned.

ATL passed a motion yesterday to campaign to protect rural schools across the country and maintain their funding.

Proposing the motion, Trevor Cope from Devon said he recently saw four local rural schools close, causing those villages to have “no heart”.

He said losing a school can cause the “sorry death of a village” and causes “untold damage” to communities.

He added: “The first thing that happens, is the shop closes, and that’s the post office as well.

“There’s no children to drop in for sweets and no parents to pop into the post office to post letters.

“The younger people move out of the village because they have to. The pub then closes. This is a rural crisis.”

Ian Courtney, chairman of the National Governors’ Association (NGA) and of a federation of schools in West Devon, said there was “no evidence” that academies would improve standards.

He said there were potentially issues over teachers’ pay following the end of collective bargaining and was not happy about the prospect of scrapping parent governors but said he disagreed with predictions that rural schools would close simply because of the programme.

He added: “I would take the opposite view with the caveat that they must be properly managed.

“I chair a federation of small schools – having a village school is one of the joys of rural life – and we are able to mitigate costs by centralising services, boring back room stuff, maximising what we spend on teachers.

“Partnership between schools is incredibly powerful way to protect rural schools. You cannot try to save every little school for the sake of it.”

The conversion to academies is a mixed picture across Devon and Cornwall.

Torbay is among the top five in England for the proportion of schools awarded academy status.

At 67%, it comes behind just Darlington (70%), Bromley (71%), Bournemouth (78%) and North East Lincolnshire (79%) for conversions.

Torbay Council’s executive member in charge of schools, Julien Parrott, has said he believes schools are “embracing the freedom” that academisation provides.

In Cornwall the conversion rate is almost double the national average, at 46% of the county’s 278 schools.

In Plymouth, the figure drops, but is still higher than average at 32% of the city’s 96 schools.

But in Devon, the conversion rate is just 24%, with 87 of the county’s 363 primary and secondary schools adopting the model.

Education secretary Nicky Morgan said schools are more likely to produce better results as academies, with multi-academy chains using expertise to pull up those which are performing badly.

However, teaching unions have said there was “no evidence” to support the government’s claims.

Union leaders and Labour MPs have pledged to work with leading Tories on Conservative-held county councils who last month also voiced disquiet at the plans.

One of them was Melinda Tilley, the cabinet member for education at Oxfordshire County Council – which includes the Prime Minister’s Witney seat.

She said: “It means a lot of little primary schools will be forced to go into multi-academy trusts and I just feel it’s the wrong time, in the wrong place, for little primary schools to be forced into doing this.

“I’m afraid there could be a few little village schools that get lost in all of this.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Teachers-warn-academies-programme-final-nail/story-29070366-detail/story.html

Exmouth Regeneration: mixed views, mostly negative

“.. One issue the business owner did have with the developments was what he described as a ‘secrecy’ surrounding the plans.


He said: “I don’t think the council has been very forthcoming. I’ve asked them what the latest position is and they’ve told me they still have nothing to tell me.

“The schemes show I am being moved, but I haven’t officially been told that. If it improves Exmouth and that involves me moving then I’m for it, but I don’t like being constantly kept in the dark and hearing things first in the paper.

“I would like to develop the site, but there’s no point when we don’t know what is happening. The business is being starved of development.” …

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Jury-s-Exmouth-seafront-development-plans/story-29069835-detail/story.html

Beware supermarkets bearing gifts – particularly affordable housing!

This is what Tesco promised Seaton in 2009 – see highlighted last paragraph and does the store REALLY have 250 staff:

Sandwiched between the red and white cliffs of the Jurassic Coast and surrounded by acres of unspoilt saltmarsh, the Devon resort of Seaton has prided itself on its status as a serene backwater whose last serious skirmish with an unwanted invader was 700 years ago when it supplied Edward I with ships and sailors to fight off the French.

Yesterday, however, the 7,500 inhabitants of the town on the south Devon coast were readying themselves for a new battle after Tesco bought its largest employer, a holiday village, and promptly ordered its closure. The site also houses Seaton’s only nursery, catering for 35 children, and a swimming pool.

The 152 staff at the Lyme Bay Holiday Village have received redundancy letters informing them that the village, which hosts 40,000 people a year, will close next January to make way for a new development including a large supermarket, a visitor centre and tourist accommodation.

Residents have accused the retail giant, which last year made profits of nearly £2bn, of “breathtaking arrogance” by failing to present any firm proposals for the 15-hectare plot or a timetable for its redevelopment, meaning the town faces the prospect of being without a nursery or housing for the 80 holiday village staff who live on the sites.

Campaigners claim the company, which has said it wants to help make Seaton a “sustainable tourism” centre, has failed to respond to requests for a meeting to discuss its plans and only exercised its option to buy the holiday village after Sainsbury’s, expressed interest last month in acquiring land to build a store.

Lizzie Bewsher, head of a community group opposed to the plans, Stand Up 4 Seaton, said: “In one fell swoop, Tesco have bought up and shut down Seaton’s single biggest source of employment and income. A lot of businesses in the town rely on the passing trade that the holiday village brings in. The people who live in the holiday village face being made homeless and working parents will have nowhere to leave their children. The nearest nursery will be 10 miles away. The village also has the only gym and swimming pool in a town with very few facilities.

“Tesco has done this without offering any assurances that these facilities will be replaced next January or indeed without putting forward any plans for what it wants to do after the closure. It is acting with breathtaking arrogance. We have absolutely no guarantee whatsoever that Tesco will not bulldoze the holiday village, put a big fence around it and leave it untouched for a decade. They are throwing around their financial weight but we are determined not to stand for it.”

One employee said: “We are not by any means a failing business. The village is very popular with the local community and there is a very solid demand throughout the year. There is a lot of ill-feeling that a good business is being closed down without anything firm to replace it.”

If Tesco builds a store in Seaton it will be its tenth outlet within 22 miles. Residents have to travel 18 miles to reach one of its main competitors (Sainsbury’s, Asda or Morrisons), but there is a Waitrose seven miles away.

Tesco said in a statement: “The regeneration of Seaton … will bring significant and lasting benefits to the town, including new employment opportunities, with 250 or more new jobs being created by the new store, attractive shopping facilities and affordable housing. With regard to nursery provision, we are very happy to consider reproviding this service as part of the scheme in conjunction with private operators.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tesco-invades-seaton-ndashclosing-the-nursery-and-holiday-village-800210.html

More on rural broadband – yet another omnishambles

It appears that the Government felt that there might be too much overlap between the EDDC bid and the one for the rest of Devon that EDDC pulled out of to go it alone and that it would not be a good use of public money.

From papers submitted to the Scrutiny Committee:

From a report bt Phil Twiss:

Update to EDDC scrutiny committee (14th April meeting) re Broadband provision

You will be aware that EDDC submitted a bid for funding to the Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK) South West Ultrafast Broadband fund in respect of a technical solution (EDDC in conjunction with Broadway Partners) to provide wider provision of Broadband in East Devon “not spots/white areas” where the current Connecting Devon and Somerset (CDS)/British Telecommunications (BT), BT commercial or any other provider has any current plans to do so. The application was for £2 million.

I regret that our application was unsuccessful as you will see from the two letters that are appended to this update.

The reasons given for refusal to progress our application are disappointing given there is no comment on the validity or otherwise of the technical solution proposed in the application and mainly relates to tax payers money potentially double funding the project and EDDC’s unwillingness to share data with CDS to avoid this.

EDDC has never been unwilling to share data with CDS as is acknowledged by CDS and as recently as 4th February 2016 in the E Mail below from me to CDS which again sets out our position. BDUK has assumed a view on data sharing without asking EDDC if this was actually the case.

The refusal was appealed by the EDC CEO and the second letter as attached maintains the position where for reasons best known to BDUK suggests that in order to avoid double funding an NDA (non-disclosure agreement) would need to be signed with CDS whereby no details of where, when or how tax payers money could be published by EDDC in terms of openness and transparency. To date EDDC has refused to sign an NDA with CDS for either phase 1 or going in to phase 2 delivery of Broadband where the explanation given is on grounds of commercial confidentiality; difficult to comprehend given no contracts have been agreed for phase 2 delivery of service!”

SO EDDC IS SAYING IT WANTS OPENNESS AND TRANSPARENCY IN CONTRACTS!!!! THE COUNCIL THAT REFUSES TO PUBLISH ANY INFORMATION ON ITS OWN CONTRACTS!!!!

What the government said:

To avoid using State aid, it would be necessary to ensure that any public funding be provided on the same basis as commercial finance, in other words, via a loan or similar with commercial rates of interest. As such, there may be more appropriate approaches to accessing the necessary project finance, including via commercial lending, or possibly via the proposed Broadband Infrastructure Fund that was announced in last autumn’s Spending Review.”

Click to access 140416-scrutiny-agenda-combined.pdf

So, our rural businesses are still up the creek without paddles.

Next scrutiny committee agenda published – rural broadband down the pan

Really worth a full read but here are some highlights:

Broadband (or lack of):

I regret that our application was unsuccessful as you will see from the two letters that are appended to this update.” (Twiss quote)

The exchange of correspondence between EDDC and the grant funders who turned down the application is VERY enlightening and should be a major embarrassment to lead councillor Phil Twiss.

Having pulled out of the Devon-wide consortium that has just been granted extra funding we are – precisely nowhere, in fact worse than that, much further back with rural broadband provision than ever before.

Public engagement (or lack of):

A risible attempt to produce a (very brief) report that pretends that EDDC consults appropriately and widely – but listing examples where the public has the exact opposite opinion!

Website (or lack of)

Boasting that more and more forms are going online and how wonderful the industry insiders think it is (so it’s a pity you can rarely find what you are looking for as an outsider and with many documents missing. But how you can get gold stars from your colleagues when your search function is described only as “fairly good” beats Owl!

and the committee’s draft report for the council’s own annual report all up for scrutiny.

Click to access 140416-scrutiny-agenda-combined.pdf

“Bluffer’s Guide to Devolution”

… was how the EDDC Chief Executive, Mark Williams, described the document he presented to Cabinet members at Knowle this evening. Well, he should know … .