Brexit and the countryside

“Brexit has not yet happened; it is likely to be at least two years before we formally withdraw from the EU. But whilst these policy changes will take years for lawyers and policy makers to wrangle over, more immediate effects are already happening on the ground.

Fundamental to these changes is the element of uncertainty. Depending on which blogs you follow and which papers you read, you will see different degrees of doom mongering. But ultimately uncertainty is bad for business, particularly construction. Indeed in the days after the referendum UK house builders lost as much as 40% of their share value.

July data from the global financial services information company Markit shows that the average drop in house building over the past two months has been the most severe for seven years. Together with the International Monetary Fund reducing its UK 2017 predicted growth figures from 2.2% in April to 1.3% the ingredients seem to be coming together to create the perfect storm for another recession.

Sadly here at Link we know all too well the impact that economic downturns can have on the planning system. Since the last recession started in 2008 there has been a drastic policy shift away from sustainable development towards ‘sustainable economic growth’ –the word ‘sustainable’ seems like an afterthought rather than an integral part of the Government’s vision. This has been manifested in government policy such as the National Planning Policy Framework and also through the systematic stripping back of planning guidance, compounded by the continual drive to cut ‘red tape’. If another recession hits this direction of travel may continue – unless we show policy makers what the effects of these changes would be. We are already hearing, anecdotally, that developers are reconsidering the viability of schemes following the Brexit vote. It is our fear that ‘green infrastructure’, such as the provision of wildlife habitats, will be cut as a part of these re-evaluated deals, along with affordable housing and community facilities, and more and more unsuitable sites will be released for new development.

Whatever happens to the European Directives or the economy, over the next months and years the UK is signed up to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. The planning system has a central role in delivering on these goals, particularly goals 11 and 15 – ‘Sustainable cities and communities’ and ‘Life on land’.

So, in these uncertain times whilst continually pushing to maintain robust environmental legislation, we must also be continuing to make the case for nature and the countryside, and the value they add to everyone’s lives, including as part of development projects.

http://www.wcl.org.uk/brexit-promises-more-change-for-the-planning-system.asp

East Devon villages must feed back on EDDC’s plans for their boundaries by 28 September 2016

The expansion of some of East Devon’s most recognisable villages is at the forefront of a new public consultation.

East Devon District Council has begun the eight-week process for its major draft Villages Plan.b The idea is to guide where new developments will go at 14 of the district’s larger villages, as well as the town of Colyton.

Responses will be looked over by the council’s Strategic Planning Committee, before a final version of the plan is produced for yet another consultation.

Locations earmarked for expansion include Beer, Broadclyst, Clyst St. Mary, East Budleigh, Feniton, Kilmington, Musbury, Newton Poppleford, Sidbury, Uplyme, West Hill, Whimple, Woodbury and the town of Colyton.

The Villages Plan will show a black line – the technical term being a Built-up Area Boundary – around the villages.

Within the black line, new houses will generally be acceptable, but outside they will only be acceptable in special circumstances.

The consultation gives the public an opportunity to comment on where the lines should be drawn.

The aim of the council’s planning policy team is to ensure that the main existing built-up areas are included, together with areas that have already been agreed for development – either through planning permission or planning allocations.

A number of alternatives have already been considered, including not having boundaries, drawing boundaries more tightly or drawing them more loosely.

However, none of these options have been progressed, as they differ from the approach set out in the Local Plan which was adopted in January 2016.

Further research has been undertaken to determine whether the boundaries drawn using the council’s existing criteria should be reduced in areas where it is difficult to access local services and facilities on foot.

This approach is being proposed for Beer, Newton Poppleford, Uplyme and West Hill.

Planning permission is less likely to be granted for new housing and industry that fall into areas outside the black line, but this does not mean that these homes and businesses are not part of a village in any other way.

The Villages Plan does not affect any changes that residents could make to their homes without planning permission.

Councillor Andrew Moulding, who is Chairman of the Strategic Planning Committee, said: “We will consider all the comments that are made before producing an East Devon Villages Plan for further public consultation.

“It will then be formally submitted for consideration by an independent Inspector who will decide whether the plan is sound. It is important that we seek the views of the local communities on this plan, which will help in the determination of planning applications.”

Communities and residents have until Wednesday, September 28 to put forward any comments they wish to make on the draft plan. The Villages Plan will then be submitted for examination by a Planning Inspector.

The draft consultation Villages Plan and supporting documents are available at the council offices at Station Road, Sidmouth, in local libraries, with the relevant parish councils or online here:

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy/villages-plan/villages-plan-2016-consultation/

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/here-s-how-these-14-east-devon-could-expand-and-how-to-have-your-say-on-it/story-29601801-detail/story.html

A lesson in political hypocrisy in Exmouth

Last night, Councillor Bill Nash spoke vehemently at an Exmouth Town Council meeting in favour of the demolition of play facilities in Exmouth to make way for “regeneration” – indeed there was a public spat with another Conservative councillor who was against it.

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2016/08/08/conservative-councillors-in-exmouth-do-not-see-eye-to-eye-it-seems/

However, in his own interest he raised an objection to these plans:

image

The power of whipping?

 

Swire does a Trump – Twitter spat with Tim Farron

“The Devon MP nominated for a knighthood in David Cameron’s resignation honours has hit out at Lib Dem leader Tim Farron for his ongoing criticism of the list.

East Devon MP Hugo Swire accused Mr Farron of being “sanctimonious”, following his repeated calls for the list of names to be rejected and the process overhauled.

The less than friendly exchange comes as MPs announce they are investigating Mr Cameron’s chosen recipients, alongside his 13 newly created peers. …

… Mr Farron described it as “so full of cronies it would embarrass a medieval court”. “He is not the first Prime Minister to leave office having rewarded quite so many friends, but he should be the last,” he added.

In an apparent reply to his criticism, Mr Swire sent a tweet stating he “can’t decide who is more tiresome and sanctimonious: [former chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life] Sir Alistair Graham or @timfarron”.

Close run thing,” he tweeted.

Mr Farron replied by congratulating the former Foreign Office minister on his award, stating it was “richly deserved”.

Whether this was in sincerity or sarcasm, it prompted one further tweet from Mr Swire: “15 Love to Tim!”.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/devon-mp-engaged-in-twitter-spat-with-tim-farron-over-honours-list/story-29600423-detail/story.html

Owl thinks that Mr Farron’s choice of the word ‘richly’ might just be giving the game away … subtle Tim … subtle … maybe too subtle for Hugo, though!

Conservative councillors in Exmouth do not see eye to eye it seems

From a correspondent:

This evening, Exmouth Town Council met to discuss the planning application to demolish Jungle Fun and Crazy Golf.

There was a packed public gallery and councillors Fred Caygill (Conservative), Brenda Taylor (Liberal Democrat) and Tim Dumper (Liberal Democrat) did what they should do – spoke to represent the views of residents. Exmouth Town Council then voted 4 to 3 against the application. Councillors Caygill, Taylor, Dumper and Masding (Green) voted against.

However, one councillor – Conservative Bill Nash – caused quite a stir.

Councillor Nash was the first councillor to speak after public speaking ended, first requesting a recorded vote and then speaking in support of the application. He turned to the public gallery to speak in what seemed to be a very heated way, and appeared to have the erroneous idea that all the public were worried about was phase 3 (the final stages of development as planned). He seemed agitated and several people thought he spoke somewhat patronisingly, saying that it was “a straightforward demolition”. He did not seem amenable to any discussion with anyone who did not share this viewpoint.

After the recorded vote, and as the public left the gallery, councillor Nash turned to councillor Fred Caygill (who was sitting next to him) and appeared to say to him, in a very agitated and angry way, that he wanted a quiet word with him for a couple of minutes.

Cllr Caygill, to his credit, did not rise to this but – as Chair Councillor Lynn Elson became aware that members of the public were watching this exchange – she advised them to stop.

It was not clear from the exchange exactly what Councillor Nash wished to discuss with Councillor Caygill after the meeting.

French ruling party has grave doubts about Hinkley C

“The ruling Socialist Party of French President Francois Hollande said on Monday the Hinkley Point nuclear project in Britain is a risk to the survival of state-owned utility EDF and that all doubts about the project must be cleared up before it continues.

The party, which has traditionally been pro-nuclear, said in a statement on its website that the utility’s decision to go ahead with the 18 billion pound ($23 billion) project was a cause for concern.

“The Socialist Party believes that a project that is so important that it could jeopardize the solidity and survival of the national energy company requires that all doubts and hesitations be cleared up before the project continues,” the party said.

It added that it was convinced that the state would do all it can to achieve this aim.

A deeply divided EDF board approved the Hinkley Point project with a narrow 10-7 majority on July 28. Hours later, the British government – which had been expected to sign the contracts the next day – said it needed more time to consider the project and would decide in the autumn.

EDF’s unions are all against the project and the company’s finance director and one of its board members have resigned over it.”

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-edf-britain-socialists-idUSKCN10J27I

EDF board members: conflict of interest?

“EDF’s decision to invest in the £18bn Hinkley Point should be declared invalid, French trade unions have said, as pressure builds against the troubled nuclear power plant project. …

… The CGT, CFE-CGC and FO unions said not enough consideration was given to whether EDF board members were subject to a conflict of interest, because some are employed by companies that stand to benefit from Hinkley.

“Who can say that with a rigorous management of the conflicts of interest and real transparency of information, the board decision would not have been different,” the unions said. …”

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/aug/08/edf-decision-hinkley-point-should-be-declared-void-french-unions-government-approval-nuclear

It seems that conflicts f interest are simply swept under many carpets these days.

Our Local Enterprise Partnership has several members with direct and indirect nuclear interests.

“Control of assets” more important than creating a national park says EDDC

Owl says: how come Dorset is so enthusiastic then? It, too, has assets but seems happy to use them for the greater good.

Of course, assets can be bought by developers … but it is much harder to develop a national park … and our LEP would be very unhappy, as where would those EXTRA 176,000 houses go, over and above those in Local Plans.

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/plans_for_east_devon_national_park_dismissed_as_opportunistic_approach_on_region_s_assets_1_4645079

What ‘Architects Journal’ has to say about Exmouth Splat remarketing!

“If you’re stuck in a sweltering office and need a professional reason for beachfront leisure to be at the forefront of your mind Exmouth could be the answer

East Devon Council is soon to be seeking ‘fresh ideas’ for the coastal town’s Queen’s Drive with £18 million plans by development partner Moirai Capital Investments expected to be cannonballed into the deep blue.

The sun baked site – just metres away from a sandy beach and the cooling waters of the English Channel – had been earmarked for new apartments, retail and a multi-screen cinema.

But after lengthy legal negotiations with site tenants the local authority has decided new concepts are in order and has announced it is considering to re-market the plot.

Now it’s your opportunity to dust off your contacts in the area – Moirai has already declared its intention to rebid – and let your imagination go wild.

Although before you commission a working model water slide or any mankini strewn renders it’s worth considering the brief. The council – seeking the predictable twin pillars of a ‘money making and vibrant’ solution – has in mind wet weather facilities catering for the many non-heatwave days of the year.

Furthermore the site already has outline planning permission for a café, retail units, play facilities and a hotel or holiday accommodation which the council prefers over any residential.”

http://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/competitions/comps-insider-fresh-ideas-sought-for-exmouth-beachfront-plot/10008942.fullarticle

Can the NHS add up? Not in Sidmouth and Ottery

“Health bosses have been warned that a lack of trust and transparency continues to hang over the future of hospitals in Sidmouth and Ottery St Mary.

The NHS Success Regime – tasked with determining the model of care provision – has been called to account in the wake of cancelled public meetings and discrepancies in published figures over hospital beds.

Representatives from the region’s health and care forums (HCF) have said better community engagement is needed. They have also questioned how decisions are being reached after one document stated the daily cost of a community bed in East Devon was £750, and another at £313. The correct figure for the average cost of an occupied community hospital bed in East Devon is £289.

Chief executive of the Success Regime Angela Pedder has apologised for the error, but reiterated that the status quo does not ensure the best outcomes for patients.

In letters sent to Ms Pedder on behalf of the region’s HCF, Ottery town councillor Elli Pang said: “A lack of trust and transparency continues. We can agree with you that our objectives are also to maximise best outcomes for patients. We would, however, challenge that your actions will achieve that in the short-term if you follow rigidly the idea of community bed removal.”

Speaking at an Ottery Town Council meeting on Monday, she revealed that an event on the future of the town’s hospital had been cancelled and expressed fears that the outcome of a future consultation has been predetermined. …”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/sidmouth_and_ottery_st_mary_representatives_claim_there_is_a_lack_of_trust_in_wake_of_hospital_beds_cost_discrepancy_1_4645063

Chinese military wants a stake in the UK nuclear industry

“A controversial Chinese company has been selected to bid for millions of pounds of public money in a UK government competition to develop mini nuclear power stations.

The China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) features twice in a government list of 33 projects and companies deemed eligible to compete for a share in up to £250m to develop so-called small modular reactors (SMR).

Why have ministers delayed final approval for Hinkley Point C?

The involvement of a different Chinese company in the high-profile Hinkley Point C project in Somerset was widely believed to have prompted the government’s decision to pause the deal at the 11th hour last month.

Nick Timothy, Theresa May’s co-chief of staff, has previously expressed alarm at the prospect of CNNC having such close access to the UK’s energy infrastructure because it would give the state-owned firm the potential ability to build weaknesses into computer systems.

The company was formerly China’s Ministry of Nuclear Industry and developed the country’s atomic bomb and nuclear submarines, as well as being a key player in its nuclear power industry.

In an article on the ConservativeHome website, Timothy singled out CNNC’s military links as a reason the UK government should be wary of such involvement.

“For those who believe that such an eventuality [shutting down UK energy at will] is unlikely, the Chinese National Nuclear Corporation – one of the state-owned companies involved in the plans for the British nuclear plants – says on its website that it is responsible not just for ‘increasing the value of state assets and developing the society’ but the ‘building of national defence’,” he wrote.

Tom Burke, chairman of the environment thinktank E3G and a former British government adviser, said there were legitimate concerns over the company. “I don’t fuss very much about the Chinese owning a nuclear power station [China General Nuclear in the case of Hinkley]. But I would be much more concerned about bringing in CNNC because they are known to be much more closely involved with the military and Chinese nuclear weapons programmes,” he said.

CNNC was not involved in the original Hinkley deal but it was reported on Sunday that the company has agreed in principle to buy half of China’s 33% stake in the £24bn project if it goes ahead.

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/aug/07/chinese-firm-with-military-ties-invited-to-bid-for-role-in-uks-nuclear-future

EDDC Freemasons: get that Caribbean spirit and smile!

We know that there are several Freemasons at East Devon District Council. Current declarations of interest show four Freemason councillors: Ian Hall (Axminster), John Humphries (Exmouth), Andrew Moulding (Axminster) and Tom Wright (Budleigh). Officers are not obliged to make Declarations of Interest.

So, EDDC Freemasons – loosen up, smile and go to visit Caribbean or West Africa Lodges to feel the joy! It’s what your Pro Grand Master wants!

“Older freemasons are being told to smile, look like they are enjoying themselves, and avoid criticising as the movement seeks to keep millennial masons happy and halt a decline in membership that has seen lodges closing at a rate of nearly 100 a year for the past decade.

Pro Grand Master Peter Lowndes, second only to the Grand Master the Duke of Kent, the Queen’s cousin, told senior brethren gathered in the Grand Temple, wearing white gloves, aprons and, if suitably qualified, the Royal Arch Breast Jewel: “I am not for one minute suggesting we try to turn our meetings into a pantomime, but most certainly I am saying there is no harm in being seen to enjoy ourselves.” …

… “We can probably all cite instances when a more senior member of a lodge is less than sympathetic to a newer member who has, perhaps, had a few lapses during the ritual. In my view exactly the opposite reaction has the right effect. …

… It’s important in masonry to retain the dignity of what we are doing, but that shouldn’t stop the charity steward making some little quip about old Fred, and everybody laughing …

… “I am in absolutely no doubt, brethren, that, if we encourage and congratulate, rather than routinely castigate our new members we will go a long way to retaining them as members and finally turn around our drop in numbers, which, incidentally, is already happening in some provinces and districts.”

The Pro Grand Master also told the brethren inside the Grand Temple in Freemasons’ Hall that lodges with dwindling numbers could learn from the jollity of members in affiliated districts abroad.

“I have often thought,” said Mr Lowndes, “that if a lodge in this country has lost its way, it could do a lot worse than to get some members to visit some of our districts, particularly, dare I say in West Africa and the Caribbean, to see how much enjoyment can be derived from their meetings.”.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/freemasons-masons-decline-freemasonry-millennial-masons-united-grand-lodge-of-england-conspiracy-a7175966.html

Cut crime and improve public transport – at the same time!

If well-off people suddenly lost their driving licenses and had to take public transport, imagine how quickly their collective pressure could improve it.

But the REALLY rich will just employ a chauffeur!

“People breaking the law in Germany might soon find themselves relying on public transport or going on foot: A new law is planned that would mean offenders – especially wealthy ones – could lose their driver’s licenses.

German Justice Minister Heiko Maas has said he intends to introduce a draft bill by the end of the year that envisages suspending the driver’s licenses of people who break the law.

“There are cases, such as with very wealthy offenders, in which a fine does not have an effect,” he told the German news magazine “Spiegel” in an interview published on Saturday.

“But suspension of a driver’s license would have tangible consequences,” he said, adding that courts would decide on whether to use the penalty on a case-by-case basis.

The planned penalty is contained in the coalition contract drawn up by Germany’s government, which consists of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservative bloc and the leftist Social Democrats.

“To create an alternative penalty to prison sentences in the case of people where a fine does not represent a perceptible setback, we will introduce license suspension as an independent penalty in adult and juvenile law,” the relevant passage says. ”

http://www.dw.com/en/germany-plans-to-introduce-license-suspensions-for-wealthy-offenders/a-19452905

Sharia law may stop MPs subsidised boozing completely

“MPs considered nationalising a Whitehall pub to avoid a drinking ban while they are relocated to the Department of Health’s offices for the duration of refurbishment works at the Palace of Westminster.

Richmond House, which hosts the department, is one of three government buildings owned by Middle East financiers who have bought into an Islamic bond issued by the government. One of its stipulations is that no alcohol will be sold on the premises.

To get around the restriction, some MPs proposed taking the Red Lion pub, located between parliament and Richmond house, into public ownership and banning entry to the general public. However, according to the Times, the move was opposed by Fuller’s Inns, the Red Lion’s owners, and a parliamentary subcommittee eventually ruled out the proposal.

Alternative drinking arrangements will still need to be made for MPs and peers – who at Westminster can choose from 10 licensed bars and restaurants – when they are moved out for the building’s renovation from 2020 onwards.

David Cameron, the former prime minister, unveiled the Islamic bond, known as a Sukuk, in 2013, as part of a drive to raise cash from Islamic investors, who cannot buy into interest-paying government bonds because of religious rules against usury.

Instead, the £200m bond sees investors effectively take ownership of three government buildings – Richmond House, Wellington House and a third Whitehall property – and take rent from the UK government for their use.

However, the small print of the deal means that the buildings must be run according to the principles of sharia law. Any attempt to serve alcohol in the buildings could lead to a conflict with investors. …

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/aug/06/mps-wanted-to-nationalise-westminster-pub-for-their-own-use

“No other prime minister will hand out resignation honours after Cameron debacle, head of sleaze watchdog says”

“No future prime minister will publish a resignation list of honours after the “public outcry” over David Cameron’s controversial choices, Theresa May’s ethical standards adviser has said.

Lord Bew, who chairs the Committee on Standards in Public Life, told the Sunday Telegraph that the idea of prime ministers handing out honours to friends when they leave office is “over”.

He also appeared hit out at some people who enter the House of Lords but fail to contribute, insisting that a peerage must be a “job” and not an “honour”.

The criticism comes as Mrs May attempts to draw a line under the row by insisting she wants a more accountable honours system than the one pursued under her predecessor. … “

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/06/no-other-prime-minister-will-hand-out-resignation-honours-after/

Exmouth regeneration: Spin, Skinner, Spin!

Q: When is an answer not an answer? A: when it is an EDDC senior councillor’s answer!

Transcribed from Exmouth Journal:

Q – We mentioned the visitor’s survey. If the outcome of the survey is that overwhelmingly visitors like the seafront the way it is and don’t want much to change, will that be the way the council then proceeds?

A – “The visitors’ survey doesn’t involve local people, it’s for visitors only. It will give us an indication of what visitors perceive is a visitor wish list when they go on holiday, what they like to see.

The interesting thing is this survey is being conducted by the South West Research Company, and we looked for a company from the South West because, when we talk about benchmarking Exmouth Against other seaside towns, it’s no good trying to compare Exmouth against Blackpool. We wanted to try and compare a South West offer with other South West seaside towns and resorts so we can see where we are.”

Umm…and the answer to the question is…?!

Widespread “disgust” at Swire “honour”

Owl is not at all surprised that Swire accepted the “honour” as unless and until his cronies get back into power, it is his only opportunity. Presumably, after pledging allegiance to his Eton cronies and having served only briefly as Mrs May’s PPS in Parliament a few years ago, she was quite certain she did not want him around.

Remember, this is the chap who “went to” St Andrews University but did not get a degree, “joined” the army but served only very briefly, had a couple of non-jobs in family-owned firms before becoming an MP, made fun of people on benefits and spent nearly £500 on a Mulberry iPad cover that he expected us to pay for (but which he ended up having to pay for himself.

In a widely-derided and disparaged honours list, he fits right in with all the others!

The Express and Echo and Claire Wright’s view:

Hugo Swire, wealthy politician and close chum of David Cameron has been criticised after being awarded a knighthood.

Devon County Councillor Claire Wright called the move “jaw-dropping”.

Hugo Swire, East Devon MP, has come under fire for being named in the former prime minister’s controversial honours list. The reasons for his knighthood are cited as “for political and public service”.

But dozens of his constituents are challenging the decision, asking what Swire has actually done to deserve the title.

County Councillor Claire Wright, who stood against Swire in the 2015 General Election, said she found it ironic the politician was knighted just weeks after he was resigned to the backbenches. She said: “On July 19 Mr Swire blogged that he was joining his “close friends” David Cameron and George Osborne on the back benches.

“Ironically, just two weeks later Mr Cameron announces that our MP will be knighted. Quite a few people have been asking what Mr Swire has done to deserve this. To my knowledge he has never voted against the party line to support his constituents.

Some residents are also challenging the decision, asking what Swire has done for their constituency. One man challenged the decision publicly, and wrote to Swire: “Can I ask why you have received this?” One woman said: “I am disgusted. He has continually voted for cuts to welfare and benefits and yet he has the nerve to accept this,” Another wrote, on learning the news: “You have got to be taking the Michael.” Ian Humphries, who lives in Exmouth, wrote on Facebook: “He certainly doesn’t deserve it, he’s done nothing for East Devon.”

Swire himself said he would now have more time for his constituency after he was sacked from his ministerial post last month.

Beforehand he served as Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Minister of State for Northern Ireland which meant, he said, that he had less time for his constituency area.

Cllr Wright said she had seen no evidence that Swire had voted in favour of his constituency against his party in the past. She shamed the list as being “filled” with Cameron’s “old boy network of friends and Tory party donors.

She said: “The former prime minister’s honours list which is filled with his old boy network friends and Tory party donors corrupts the entire system of honours and reflects badly on the conservative government. I firmly believe that knighthoods, peerages and other honours should only be bestowed on people who have given exceptional public service for the greater good.”

Cameron has been widely criticised in the national press for showering a total of 46 former aides, advisers and ministers with honours in a resignation list. Tim Farron, leader of the Liberal Democrat Party, said it was embarrassing.

“David Cameron’s resignation honours list is so full of cronies it would embarrass a medieval court. He is not the first Prime Minister to leave office having rewarded quite so many friends, but he would be the last.”

A Devon man who was keen to point out bizarre appointments of honours was Paul Baker. He wrote on Facebook: “Worst still, Sam Cam’s sister just for being her sister and the woman who suggested George Osborne went on a diet. True one nation Conservatism.”

Some on social media were not so critical of Swire’s knighthood. He also received dozens of tweets from those happy with his news. Ahmed Naseem, former foreign minister for the Maldives, wrote: “Congratulations sir, we in the Maldives value your efforts to bring back democracy we lost in the last four years.”

While Tony de Brum, former foreign minister for the republic Marshall Islands, shared a joke. He said: “Congratulations Hugo, you are a friend of the islands – even when our dry cleaners shrunk your suit.”

Former city councillor John Harvey congratulated him and said it was well deserved.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/disgust-as-hugo-swire-mp-is-awarded-knighthood-by-chum-david-cameron/story-29589285-detail/story.html

Now you can talk Hugo, remember what you wrote about Knowle planning application

image

EDDC should not grant itself planning permission … probity, accountability, transparency – remember?