When is a village not a village?

When it has 10,000 houses – it’s a TOWN!

Garden villages scheme gets cash boost

An extra £1m has been put behind the garden villages programme, taking the total government funding on offer to £7m.

Housing minister Gavin Barwell urged councils to apply for the money as “we want to ensure everyone has an affordable place to live and that means we’ve got to build more homes”.

The scheme assists the development of new villages of between 1,500 and 10,000 homes planned around green spaces.

It already supports developments planned at Bicester, Didcot, Basingstoke, a site near to Braintree, Essex, and the former RAF Deensthorpe airfield near Corby, Northamptonshire.

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/10/garden-villages-scheme-gets-cash-boost

Two mid-Devon Conservative councillors removed from committees following investigation

News announced in a press release, presumably from the council, that very carefully excludes the reasons why they were removed:

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/two-mid-devon-conservative-councillors-removed-from-committees-following-investigation/story-29809275-detail/story.html

Neil Parish offers to meet Honiton constituents about NHS cuts – in Tiverton!

Claire Wright meeting with Devon Senior Voice about health service cuts in Honiton:

“MP, Neil Parish, had submitted a statement saying he was opposed to the cuts. He has offered to meet residents … in Tiverton.

The meeting resolved to set up a campaign group to fight the plans. I wish them lots of luck.

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/well_over_100_people_packed_the_mackarness_hall_last_night_to_make_their_op

Hugo Swire bans Claire Wright from a meeting in her ward

“Hugo Swire bars me from a meeting about Tipton St John Primary School flooding problems

I was bizarrely barred from a meeting in my own ward this lunchtime, with East Devon’s MP and the chief executive of the Environment Agency, James Bevan, who met with Tipton St John school staff about the ongoing challenges of flooding at the school – an issue I have been active on for three years.

I have been involved in discussions on how the situation at Tipton St John may be remedied since I was elected as a Devon County councillor in 2013.

I asked to attend the meeting this morning, however, was informed by Hugo Swire’s office that I would not be welcome as he was “keeping the meeting very small and focused and had to limit numbers.”

I was very disappointed about being excluded as crucially important issues would be discussed that I have been actively involved with. Last year I provided funding from my county council locality budget for a flood survey and helped to clear up after at least two flooding events, arranging with the chief fire officer for Devon and Somerset, for the fire and rescue service to be involved in these clear ups.

I have attended meetings with residents about the future of the school and worked with the school – and the community on trying to find a solution to the flooding problems.

As the Devon County councillor for Tipton St John with a clear interest and involvement in supporting the community I would have thought it was entirely appropriate that I should have been invited to a meeting with the chief executive of the Environment Agency.

It was a poor decision”

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/hugo_swire_bars_me_from_a_meeting_about_tipton_st_john_primary_school_flood

Swire on health and social care

Summary:

Home care is currently in trouble with local authorities having cut their funding.”

NO! NO! NO! YOUR GOVERNMENT HAS CUT FUNDING TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES!

“… social care is means tested and supplied by the local authority, whose grants, throughout the recent period of austerity have been cut.”

BY YOUR GOVERNMENT!

As to the blame game, it simply won’t get us anywhere.”

YES IT WILL – YOUR GOVERNMENT’S AUSTERITY POLICY GOT US HERE! YOUR GOVERNMENT HAS CHOSEN TO STARVE THE NHS TO FEED HS2 FOR EXAMPLE. IT HAS INSISTED ON TARGETS THAT CANNOT BE MET BY A DEFUNDED NHS AND THEN FINES HOSPITALS FOR NOT REACHING THEM!

(And be honest, if it was Labour in power YOU would be blaming Corbyn!)

Britain spends less as a share of its GDP on health care than most other rich countries. If taxpayers want that to change they will have to pay for it. And yes that might mean patients, diverted from expensive systems of care into cheaper ones.”

NO! IT CAN SPEND MORE ON THE NHS – IT WAS A CHOICE OF YOUR GOVERNMENT TO SPEND LESS AND UNDERFUND HEALTH CARE COMPARED TO OTHER COUNTRIEs AND TO SPEND MORE ON WASTEFUL VANITY PROJECTS. THIS IS A RICH FIRST-WORLD COUNTRY NOT A POOR THIRD WORLD ONE?

“As for surgeries, why can’t doctors deal with some patients by e-mail? it would mean they could devote more time to the seriously ill when they come in. Some people already pay for prescriptions, as they do for dental health, so is the answer for some other services to be charged for?

OWL CAN BARELY REPLY. YOU KNOW IMMEDIATELY THAT THIS MAN HAS PRIVATE HEALTH CARE! CAN YOU IMAGINE PEOPLE DESCRIBING THEIR SYMPTOMS BY EMAIL! AND HOW MUCH EMAIL DOCTORS WOULD HAVE TO PLOUGH THROUGH! AND WHAT IF THE PATIENT THINKS THE PROBLEM HAS TO GO TO EMAIL AND IT TURNS OUT TO BE AN EMERGENCY! OR WHAT IF EMAIL GOES DOWN OR YOU HAVE NO COMPUTER? WHAT ABOUT SECURITY AND CONFIDENTIALITY?

I have an online booking system for my surgery but my doctor tells me only a quarter of people turn up”

SO DOESN’T THAT MEAN EITHER IT IS NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE OR EVEN THAT THERE IS MORE SPACE FOR THOSE WHO DO TURN UP ON THE DAY!

And finally:

These are only ideas, and for many they will feel like a bitter pill to swallow.”

INDEED A BITTER PILL BUT, FORTUNATELY WE DON’T HAVE TO SWALLOW IT … WE CAN FIGHT BACK.

But it’s useful to see Mr Swire’s total toeing of his party’s line. We do know where we stand with him and his party – and for the majority it is NOT shoulder to shoulder but eyeball to eyeball.

Neighbourhood planners beware – developers are out to get you

A bit legalese but VERY IMPORTANT for those currently putting together Neighbourhood Plans.

Developers have won a High Court challenge over a district council’s decision to make a neighbourhood plan.

In Stonegate Homes Ltd & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Horsham District Council [2016] EWHC 2512 Horsham took the decision to make the Henfield Neighbourhood Plan on 27 April 2016. This followed a referendum earlier in the month where the plan was passed with a vote of 94.3% of the voters.

The claimants were developers who were promoting a 72-dwelling site on the western side of Henfield. They have appealed Horsham’s refusal of their planning application for that site in November 2014; the decision is with the Communities Secretary for determination.

The claimants issued a claim under section 61N of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) (the 1990 Act) over Horsham’s making of the neighbourhood plan. They put forward three grounds, which were that:

The defendant council had failed to lawfully assess reasonable alternatives to the spatial strategy as established by the neighbourhood plan and, in particular, the alternative of permitting development on the western edge of Henfield;

The defendant had failed to consider any alternatives to the Built-Up Area Boundary (BUAB) as established in the neighbourhood plan and had failed to act rationally in the selection of the BUAB;

The defendant and/or the examining inspector failed to give any or adequate reasons as to why the neighbourhood plan met EU obligations.

The council as the defendant submitted in response:

(i) That the challenge was limited in scope by section 38A(4) and section 38A(6) of the 2004 Act to a consideration of whether the making of the neighbourhood development order would breach or would otherwise be incompatible with any EU obligation or any of the Convention rights;

(ii) Even if the scope of challenge was not so limited the option of developing land to the west of Henfield and that of including the “Barratt site” within the BUAB of Henfield had been adequately dealt with by the examiner and the defendant in a proportionate way and the reasons that had been advanced were adequate.

However, Mrs Justice Patterson found for the claimants across a number of grounds:

The plan was quashed on four grounds:

It is incumbent upon the makers of the plan, the Independent Examiner and the making authority when certifying in its opinion that the plan was compliant with EU law to employ reasoning that is sound in the public law (Wednesbury) sense.

The maker of the plan is obliged to undertake an objective assessment of the policies of the plan when discharging the above duty.

That alternatives need to be accurately presented in order for the SA/SEA of a plan to comply with European law.

All key policies of the plan need to be assessed against reasonable alternatives to have a EU law compliant SA/SEA.

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=28646%3Aboundaries-of-the-soft-touch-approach&catid=63&Itemid=31

Source: http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=28643%3Adevelopers-win-high-court-battle-over-neighbourhood-plan&catid=63&Itemid=31

Swire’s trips to Maldives fail to pay off

Hugo Swire was particularly fond of the Maldives during his time as Foreign Officer minister and made many tweets about its political situation and hope for future relations:

“The Maldives has withdrawn from the Commonwealth, accusing it of interfering in domestic affairs and “unfair and unjust” treatment.

The Commonwealth had warned the Maldives of possible suspension if it failed to show progress on democracy.
It has faced questions over freedom of speech, the detention of opponents and the independence of the judiciary.
The Indian Ocean nation became a multiparty democracy in 2008 after decades of autocratic rule.

The Maldives foreign ministry said in a statement: “The decision to leave the Commonwealth was difficult, but inevitable.

“Regrettably, the Commonwealth has not recognised progress and achievements that the Maldives accomplished in cultivating a culture of democracy in the country and in building and strengthening democratic institutions.”
It said that President Abdulla Yameen’s government had introduced a raft of measures promoting human rights and strengthening the rule of law.” …

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-37647310

Swire challenges “opposition”

…””My local political opposition [is] going to find it rather difficult to criticise me now… I’m afraid I’m going to slightly shoot their fox,” he says.

“Because all the things they say I don’t comment on, I now can and am… I no longer have to support the government.”

Topping the agenda in his newly assumed role as a backbencher is the region’s ailing infrastructure.

He shares the view that for too long the Westcountry has “suffered unfairly” from underinvestment.

“Just imagine if HS2 wasn’t going to go ahead – how much money that would release for the kind of infrastructure development we need in the South West,” he states.

“We had a good meeting with Network Rail and GWR this week, looking at their new rolling stock and the challenges to upgrade the line. [But] that’s something we’re going to have to really watch and make sure the funding is in place.”

He is also following developments with Devon Success Regime, including the campaign to keep beds in the local community hospital.

And he wants to make sure the region catches up with the roll-out of superfast broadband services.

“Every single Conservative candidate in the South West was elected on a Conservative manifesto, and it is up to every single member of Parliament to ensure their delivery is as good as their pledge,” he says.

Going from being one of he most well-travelled ministers in Government to a member of the “rank and file” has taken some getting used to.

The responsibilities associated with Mr Swire’s previous role made him heavily reliant on staff to manage his diary and provide briefings. Now, he admits he often struggles to make it to meetings on time.

However, he is staying involved with international affairs as deputy chairman of the Commonwealth Enterprise and Investment Council and head of the Conservative Middle East Council.

He says he hopes to see the UK taking more of a lead on Syria – pointing out that it would be a “wonderful opportunity” for Boris Johnson “to show what hes made of”.

“You’ve got Putin.. responsible for some biblical atrocities [and] I weep for the people of Syria,” he says. “This is a good opportunity for Britain to show some leadership.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/no-plans-for-a-quiet-retirement-to-the-backbenches-for-devon-mp/story-29806840-detail/story.html

Er, not quite true Hugo – your work with the Conservative Middle East Council seems to be taking up an awful lot of your time – breakfast meeting the Egyptian Ambassador (London), talking at a Conservative fundraising dinner in Kensington and Chelsea (London), meeting about Christians in Syria (London), chatting to the Saudi Foreign Minister … still busy on non- constituency matters in London.

And heaven only knows how busy you will be as deputy chairman of the Commonwealth Enterprise and Investment Council!

Oh, and as for getting to meetings on time – don’t forget to add in the time it takes to get from your mid-Devon second home to your constituency.

“Greater Exeter” – the fun starts here

Other Chief Executives and Senior Officers of “Greater Exeter” will no doubt demand parity – or better …

“Councillors ‘unaware’ of Teignbridge chief’s 12% pay rise”

The ruling Conservative group said Nicola Bulbeck’s rise reflected her additional responsibilities.

Councillors said they were unaware of a proposal to increase a chief executive’s pay by 12% – taking it to £141,000 – before it was passed.
Nicola Bulbeck’s £15,000 pay rise has been called “excessive” by opposition Liberal Democrat politicians on Teignbridge District Council.

But the ruling Conservative group said information about the rise was given to all councillors in June.

Lib Dems said they had not “knowingly” approved the rise last month.

More on the council row, plus more Devon and Cornwall news
The Conservatives said the rise reflected additional responsibilities for Ms Bulbeck.

It followed a cut to the number of posts in the council’s senior management team from 18 to six.

Liberal Democrat leader Gordon Hook said: “A meeting a couple of weeks ago had a report to members and there was a web link to the statement of accounts.

“On page 84 there is one line about the chief executive’s salary increase.

“There was no indication it was in the booklet or that the information was going to be brought as an item to members, which it should be.

“We accepted the report, but we were given no lead that that was part of the package.”

Councillor Jeremy Christophers, leader of Teignbridge District Council, said that the rise, which includes pension contributions of £22,000, had “always been available and updated on the website”.

“Figures have been publicly available in the annual accounts since June and were presented at audit scrutiny committee on 21 July and 14 September and full council on 26 September.
“Teignbridge proactively and routinely publishes all possible data to enhance our transparency and accountability and help residents understand how we work and the services we provide,” he said.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-37642347

Neil Parish MP erratum

Owl called Parish Chair of the Commins Transport Committee – blinded by the light of his campaign to dual the A303 perhaps – and was quickly rapped on the talons by an eagle-eyed commentator!

He is actually Chair of the EFRA Committee – Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee (Owl wasn’t blinded by him being a dairy farmer, obviously).

Wonder what he makes of his new Environment boss – Angela Leadstrom – who he supported in the leadership campaign AFTER saying he was a Remainer.

Whatever happened to … Skypark?

Readers will recall when EDDC got so panicky about vast swathes of undeveloped land at Skypark, on the edge of Cranbrook, that it created the seemingly batty idea to relocate its headquarters ther – 10-25 miles away from its voters and practically in the lap of Exeter City Council.

That was fairly quickly knocked on the head (but not without tens of thousands of our pounds being wasted – Owl wonders how much the mostly- vacant site is still costing us).

So far, there seem to be only two businesses at EDDC’s flagship Skypark – DHL couriers and an ambulance call centre.

In July of this year, St Modwyn put in a planning application for reserved matters on the site, including construction of an office block.

The planning application is:

16/1462/MRES
The erection of an office block, landscaping, car parking and associated access and infrastructure (Reserved Matters application in pursuance of outline planning permission ref: 06/3300/MOUT)

Skypark Clyst Honiton Exeter EX5 2D

Planning application describes:

… creche, 150 bed hotel, cafes, leisure and conference facilities, relocated football ground, clubhouse and facilities, strategic open space (including flood attenuation) …

It was originally submitted in July 2016, and further information was submitted 21 September 2016.

Does anyone recall a hotel, conference centre and football pitch in the original plans? Whose pitch is being relocated?

Here is a paper trail:
https://planning.eastdevon.gov.uk/online-applications/simpleSearchResults.do?action=firstPage

Surely such a big change, especially after ten years (2006 – 06/3300/MOUT) should merit a new planning application?

Care at home cannot take up the slack from hospitals

A&E units are struggling to cope because social care services that help elderly people have been cut so much that they are reaching a “tipping point”, England’s care regulator is to warn.

English care home closures are leaving vulnerable people at risk, says watchdog

Hospitals are ending up dangerously full and have seen “bedblocking” hit record levels because of a widespread failure to give elderly people enough support to keep them healthy at home, says the Care Quality Commission.

A worsening lack of at-home care services and beds in care homes are forcing hospitals to admit more patients as emergencies, which deepens their already serious financial problems. “What’s happening, we think, is that where people aren’t getting access to [social] care, and we are not preventing people’s needs developing through adult social care, is that they are presenting at A&E,” said David Behan, the CQC’s chief executive.

Figures contained in the commission’s annual report show that the number of hospital bed days lost through patients being unable to leave because social care was not available to allow them to be discharged safely soared from 108,482 in April 2012 to 184,199 in July this year – a 70% rise.

The fact that growing numbers of mainly frail, elderly people are being left without the help they need with basic chores such as washing, dressing and cooking “creates problems in other parts of the health and care system, such as overstretched A&E departments or delays in people leaving hospital,” he added. GP surgeries are also having to treat patients who became unwell or suffered an injury because they did not receive help they needed.

Behan urged ministers to give social care a higher priority and urgently find extra money for it to prevent its ongoing deterioration causing even worse problems. “We are becoming concerned about the fragility of the adult social care market, with evidence suggesting that it might be approaching a tipping point,” he said.

The CQC’s assessment of health and social care, called State of Care, adds that: “The difficulties in adult social care are already affecting hospitals. Bed occupancy rates exceeded 91% in January to March 2016, the highest quarterly rate for at least six years, and in 2015-16 we saw an increase in the number of people having to wait to be discharged from hospital, in part due to a lack of suitable care options,” the CQC’s annual report says.

The number of people in England receiving local council-funded social care services fell by 26% from 1.1m in 2009 to about 850,000 in 2013-14, at a time of Whitehall-driven cuts to town hall budgets. The number of people with unmet needs has risen from 800,000 in 2010 to more than 1 million last year, according to Age UK.

Growing unavailability of social care was a key driver of the 3% rise in emergency admissions to hospital last year and 11% rise in bed days lost to bedblocking. That was mainly due to patients having to wait for a package of care to be put in place to let them return home or for a place in a nursing home to become available. “The effect of these delays on the NHS is significant, costing hospitals £820m a year,” the National Audit Office says.

NHS bodies, health thinktanks and charities urged government to use next month’s autumn statement to inject extra funding into social care.

Simon Stevens, the chief executive of NHS England, has already called for any extra funding for the health service to instead be used to prop up social care. Jeremy Hunt, the health secretary, is understood to privately agree. On Monday Stephen Dorrell, the ex-Conservative health secretary, said that the government’s policy of giving social care less and less money was “insane economics and bad social policy” and undermined its claim to be backing the NHS.

Cuts to social care and also mental health and public health mean “the NHS is being stretched to the limit,” said Stephen Dalton, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, which represents hospitals. “Relying on political rhetoric that promises to protect the NHS but fails to acknowledge that a cut in social care results in a cost to the NHS, is an economic deception.”

The CQC also disclosed that about 800,000 patients are registered with a GP practice that its inspectors have judged to be inadequate on safety grounds. It is concerned that some surgeries deliver “unacceptable standards of care”. Safety failings include poor management of medicines, inappropriately trained staff and premises that are unsuitable.

The Department of Health welcomed the CQC’s findings that “the majority of the NHS, 72% of adult social care services and 87% of GP practices inspected are good or better – and that improvement is taking place all over the country”.

A spokeswoman said: “The NHS is performing well at a time of increasing demand. The government is investing £10bn to fund its own plan for the future, and crucially is ensuring that the amount of money available to local authorities for social care is rising in future years of the parliament, reaching up to £3.5bn extra by 2020.”

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/oct/13/social-care-cuts-take-english-service-to-tipping-point-regulator-warns

Parliamentary paper on integrating health and social care

(5 pages)
Summary

“Overview

Integration aims to put the needs of people at the centre of how services are organised and delivered. Models of integration vary.

Co-ordinating resources or pooling budgets between health and social care services can enable joint working. The four nations of the UK have introduced different financial arrangements to support integration.

Data sharing, as well as different incentives and employment terms between sectors, pose challenges for integration.

Assessing the effectiveness of integration schemes is difficult. Evaluation tends to focus on whether integration has relieved pressure on services, such as reducing emergency hospital admissions, which data suggest is not routinely achieved. However, integration may improve user outcomes and experiences, but data to assess these are not consistently collected.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/10/pf-perspectives-experts-say-health-and-social-care-needs-urgent-and-radical-reform-2

Health and social care relationship – too broken to fix?

“CIPFA has called for the creation of independent commission on health and social care to devise how to fund provision in the future after experts raised concerns about how the system would cope with rising demand.

Experts brought together by PF and CIPFA as part of the Public Finance Perspectives series concluded that urgent and radical reforms would be needed. Contributors included The King’s Fund’s senior fellow social care Richard Humphries, The Health Foundation’s director of research and economics Anita Charlesworth and CIPFA’s head of health and integration faculty Jane Payling.

In Funding a Healthy Future, they highlighted the sector is facing increasing uncertainty due to Brexit and its implication for the health and social care budget, research capacity and employment prospects.

Social care was identified as among the most pressing concerns among many contributions as it must function well for the NHS to remain sustainable. However, severe funding pressure could lead to it reducing the services provided, which the experts said would have a knock-on effect on the health service.

An independent commission should be formed to consider what options are available to balance demand and supply. Also, CIPFA called for the introduction of a so-called ‘golden ratio’ of 10%, which is the proportion of national gross domestic product that is ring-fenced for health and social care spending. This would reduce the unpredictability of politically-driven decisions on funding, and provide a logical benchmark for what the nation can afford to spend on the area.

The alternative is that the public would see an increase in the rationing of services, significant tax rises or charges for using the NHS and social care.

CIPFA chief executive Rob Whiteman stated that without radical transformation, the government would struggle to ensure the NHS and social care system will be sustainable for future generations.

“Indeed, the concerns of leading experts that CIPFA has gathered clearly demonstrate that the sector is already creaking under the strain,” he stated. “To protect services, the severe financial stress the sector is under must be confronted with great urgency.”

This meant tough and politically unpopular choices would have to be made in order to ensure the quality of health and social care services, he added.

“CIPFA believes that a commission must be set up to explore these difficult decisions. It should also introduce a golden ratio of GDP spend on healthcare to protect funding from the unpredictability of short-sighted political decisions.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/10/pf-perspectives-experts-say-health-and-social-care-needs-urgent-and-radical-reform-2

Landowners know best what’s good for the community

Sidford Fields: landowner says is should be built in the AONB because it will be good for the community.

Sidford cycle route by the river or inland in the AONB: landowner seems reluctant to engage with the community in talks.

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/riverside_route_could_be_revisited_for_sidford_sidbury_link_1_4726831

Implicit admission that LEP is mothballed and its Single Economic Plan was not effective and new consultation needed

QUESTION FROM COUNCILLOR VINT
Re: HOTSW and Economic Development Consultation

When drafting the economic development elements of the Heart Of The South West Devolution Prospectus how were the primary employment, housing and social needs of the region identified, and how were residents and small businesses consulted to help identify these needs?”

REPLY BY COUNCILLOR HART

“On the 19th September 2016, I gave a presentation at a Member Development Session on Devolution which is available on the Councils website at

Devolution

The presentation is clear in setting out the next steps for the partnership.

In respect of further engagement with key stakeholders in the development of our joint economic priorities; this will be undertaken through the development of a Productivity Plan. This plan will replace the current Single Economic Plan developed by the Local Enterprise Partnership and is an opportunity for all local authority partners and stakeholders to fully engage in developing proposals that will deliver greater prosperity across the Heart of the South West.

The Partnership is starting work on this in Autumn and will be engaging with groups through to Spring. Members will have the opportunity to consider the draft Productivity Plan before final approval.”

This presentation also set out a timetable for formal public and stakeholder consultation starting in the early New Year on the creation of a Combined Authority and a draft deal with Government.

At this meeting I did, however, emphasise that this timetable is subject to Government formally engaging with the Partnership.

I can confirm that the Partnership is not actively engaged in formal negotiations with Government and therefore this timeline will be amended.

The Partnership is clear that it will only go to formal public consultation when it has an offer from Government for the public and stakeholders to consider. I will, of course, continue to keep Members updated on progress with Devolution.

http://democracy.devon.gov.uk/mgConvert2PDF

“Care crisis sees 1,500 homes shut in six years’

Almost 1,500 care homes have closed in the last six years, figures from the health watchdog revealed yesterday.
Experts say the closures are having a devastating impact on the lives of vulnerable elderly patients.

Many are being kept in hospital unnecessarily, becoming ‘bed blockers’, because there is no room in nearby homes.

The Care Quality Commission said it is extremely concerned about the ‘pace’ of closures – which is driven by a crisis in funding – and warned it could ‘undermine the quality and safety of care that people receive’.

Tomorrow it will publish a damning report that is likely to show that hundreds of the remaining homes are putting patients at risk.

Figures obtained from the CQC by BBC News show there are now 16,614 care homes and nursing homes in England – down from 18,068 in September 2010.

The closures are being fuelled by Government cuts to councils’ social care budgets.

Councils are not paying care home providers enough to keep up with the costs of looking after vulnerable residents.
This means it is not profitable for providers to keep so many homes open, so they shut those that are running at a loss.

But the closures are happening just as demand is steadily increasing due to our ageing population.

Figures obtained from the CQC by BBC News show there are now 16,614 care homes and nursing homes in England – down from 18,068 in September 2010. And the lack of available spaces is leading to rising numbers of the elderly being kept in hospital.

This has a devastating impact on their health and means there is a lack of beds for patients coming in from A&E.
CQC’s chief inspector of adult social care, Angela Sutcliffe, said: ‘It does highlight a concern that the long-term sustainability of high-quality care within this sector could be at risk …

‘We know that the adult social care sector faces many financial pressures, which worryingly could undermine the quality and safety of care that people receive and rely upon every day.’

Tomorrow the CQC will publish its annual report on the standards of care at England’s thousands of care homes, hospitals and GPs surgeries.

Last year it rated a third of the 17,000 residential and nursing homes as either ‘inadequate’ or ‘requires improvement.’

Experts are also worried about a repeat of the collapse of the Southern Cross healthcare group in 2011, which left 30,000 elderly residents having to be urgently relocated.
The provider was forced to close all of its 750 care homes because it could no longer afford the rent.

In a further blow, many providers are cutting back on council-funded home care visits because they aren’t profitable.

This means vulnerable residents who rely on such visits to help them wash and dress are suddenly having them stopped.
Last night Professor Martin Green, chief executive of Care England, which represents care homes, said the Government needed to take ‘urgent action’ to provide councils with more funding.

‘We have been warning about these problems for some time. There is a lot of churn in the sector – contracts changing hands as providers leave and services stopping,’ he said.
‘There is simply not enough money in the system.’ Caroline Abrahams, of charity Age UK, added: ‘Few public services are as important as social care, and yet it is clearly in serious, progressive decline.’

A Department of Health spokesman admitted the current market was ‘challenging.’ But they said ministers were taking steps to help through the creation of a new pot of money called the Better Care Fund.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3833463/Care-crisis-sees-1-500-homes-shut-six-years-Closures-having-devastating-effect-lives-elderly-patients-leading-bed-blocking-hospitals.html

A tale of two AONBs

A gas-fired power station has been proposed for the East Devon village of Hawkchurch on the East Devon- West Dorset border NEAR an AONB (Area of outstanding Natural Beauty) in Dorset. It was not put out to consultation to the local community.

West Dorset MP Oliver Letwin says of it:

This development will have an impact on the West Dorset AONB.

“I do not believe it is appropriate, or in line with national planning policy, for industrial installations to be located in ways that have such impact on landscape of national importance. I hope, therefore, that this application will be refused.”

Councillor tries to extend consultation period on ‘power station’

In East Devon, an industrial site is being planned WITHIN the AONB at Sidford – after it had been agreed that it would not be allowed in the Local Plan but slipped in because officers did not offer up evidence to a Planning Inspector to remove it.

The local MP, Hugo Swire, has said …

… absolutely nothing at all.

Neil Parish knows exactly how to drum up post-Brexit trade!

Question in Parliament yesterday:

Does my hon. Friend agree that what is different about having a new royal yacht now is that we are sailing into a brave new world, and that we will do, and need to do, many more trade deals across the world? There is a great opportunity not only to support the royal family, but to support the nation in getting those trade deals

His other parliamentary questions in 2016 have covered. Bear in mind he is a dairy farmer and Chairman of the Commons Transport Committee.

Summary: good to have onside if you are a farmer or use the A303 a lot. Not so good if you are an ordinary voter desperately trying to get on the housing ladder or a struggling seaside town in his area (Seaton is in his constituency) or a pensioner worried about your current or future health!

To be fair: he did speak up at the Feniton development public inquiry – but his written questions fo reflect his major interests:

Questions 2016

The Swansea tidal lagoon – two questions this year
Olympics and doping
Hybrid cars
Veal
Congratulations to Ministers
Broadband – several questions
EU sanctions on Russia
Bsdger Culling
Milk prices
Dualling A303/ West Country roads – many questions.
Eating Well
The dairy industry
Universal Credits
Working with industry instead of bringing in a sugar tax
Stimulating venture capital investment
Farming in general – many similar questions
Police grants
Renewable heat
Onshore gas and shale extraction
Flooding ( after Somerset floods)
Biofuels
Rural areas

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?pid=24779&pop=1&p=5

How to kill a town

This is about Totnes, but could be any town, anywhere:

“There are three easy ways to destroy a town.

First – relax the planning laws so that developers can build what they want, where they want.

Two – build huge amounts of houses all at once, all over the fields surrounding the town; infill any green space inside; make sure the houses obscure everyone else; make sure they are all unaffordable to local people, but attractive to second home owners and buy to let investors; make sure you don’t provide any new infrastructure, no new schools, hospital places, improvements to roads, to sewers; make sure that local industries; the marina, the last dairy farm are closed down and covered in new, ugly boxes with no gardens and in regimented rows.

[Three] You’re nearly there now! Make sure that the roads are so congested with new cars that traffic can’t move and then for your final flourish, sell off its most treasured, vital area, in the case of Totnes, the market and the garden and the central car parks without which a town such as Totnes cannot function.

Wonderful, you’re there. You have successfully choked an ancient and very special place to death; you look at the million pound houses replacing the marina and it looks good; you look at the tacky tacky boxes spreading out over the hillside along the river and you smile to yourself, who needs farmers, they’re mucky – we can buy all we need from the huge industrial intensive farming block in Hampshire. Who needs a market?

The Black Prince may well have given this ancient town a charter, but that was such a long time ago, who needs history? Who needs tourism, there must be other jobs these people can do, well it doesn’t really matter, once we’ve got the locals out and replaced them almost entirely with second home owners, then we won’t be bothered with their complaints – black windows all winter are a bonus.

Look at Salcombe, 70% second homes and no trouble at all. All those ridiculous transition people with their big ideas and their trying to live responsibly, there’s no money to be made in that, what’s the matter with them.

No, lets make sure we do to Totnes what we have done so successfully in the past to Torbay and towns like Newton Abbot, there’s nothing quite so satisfying as ripping the heart out of a marvellous old place and replacing that heart with concrete…”

https://allengeorgina.wordpress.com/2016/10/12/how-to-kill-a-town-a-how-to-guide/