AND YET MORE TORY DIRTY TRICKS AND FAKE NEWS!

“The Conservative Party has bought a website called “labourmanifesto.co.uk” and are using it to attack the opponent party on the day of their manifesto launch.

The website, which some commentators suggest may appear to be an official Labour Party domain, has appeared at the top of some people’s Google search results as a paid advertisement. …”

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/general-election-labour-manifesto-conservative-17293310

Fake news – Tories at it AGAIN!

Tory HQ Has Been Accused Of Misleading People On Twitter – Again:

“A video appears to show Jess Phillips criticising Labour’s new manifesto – but she isn’t.

The Conservative Party has been accused of misleading voters again on social media, this time by tweeting a video of Labour candidate Jess Phillips with the wrong date on it.

The edited video, posted by the @CCHQPress Twitter account and now deleted, showed the parliamentary candidate saying: “You can never, ever deliver all of those things that you are pretending to deliver when you go to the electorate.”

@CCHQPress has dated the video November 21, 2019, giving the impression Phillips was criticising Jeremy Corbyn on the same day he launched Labour’s general election manifesto.

But the clip has been taken from an old interview, when Phillips appeared on ITV’s Good Morning Britain on October 3 to promote her new book.

The video was reaired this morning during an interview with shadow education secretary Angela Rayner.

During the original interview, Phillips was questioned by Susanna Reid about keeping manifesto promises — before the general election was announced.

Phillips said: “I think there is an argument to be said that you can never, ever deliver all of those things that you are pretending to deliver when you go to the electorate.

“In reality, things change. Globally things change, situations change. Facts change.

″[We can’t deliver it] in all cases. I can’t control the trade war between America and China and I have to, each and every day, and at the moment it is on a day-by-day basis and it is not good, and I have to say: ‘What is the best thing, the best decision I can make today to make sure my constituents are better off?’”

The video also labels Phillips a “Corbyn ally” – in reality, the 37-year-old candidate for Birmingham Yardley has been a vocal critic of the Labour leader in the past, going as far as to say he wasn’t the “practical choice” for leader because people would not vote for him.

The edited video has been criticised on Twitter.

One person said: “You know she’s not just talking about Labour right, but all politicians? She’s speaking truth whereas you only pretend to use facts.”

Another added: “Edited and old. Get a grip.”

It’s not the first time the Tories have been accused of misleading the public with a video.

The same Twitter account came under fire just this week after it rebranded itself as “FactCheckUK” during Tuesday evening’s televised leaders’ debate.

The @CCHQPress page normally carries clear Tory branding and logos and is equally clearly named.

But as Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn went head-to-head on Tuesday, the account renamed itself “FactCheckUK” and minimised any references to Conservative Campaign Headquarters (CCHQ).

Twitter warned that a repeat of the incident would result in “decisive corrective action”.

On November 5, they were accused of unfairly editing a video of Labour’s Sir Keir Starmer, to make him appear unable to answer a question on Brexit. However, the party stood by the edit, PA Media reports.

The Tories have also purchased the website labourmanifesto.co.uk.

The website purports to showcase Labour’s manifesto but instead actually attacks the party’s policies. It accuses the party of promising “higher taxes” with “no plan for Brexit”.

The Conservatives came under fire for rebranding as a “fact-checking service” during Tuesday night’s televised election debate.

Twitter and the Conservative Party did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the video.”

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/tory-hq-twitter-jess-phillips_uk_5dd69210e4b010f3f1d3a842

Manifestos here, manifestos there …

“Experts say Tory tax plans will mostly benefit wealthier people, as minister faces derision for saying government ‘not to blame’ for poverty.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-news-live-general-election-brexit-polls-labour-manifesto-latest-a9211656.html

AND

“IFS rejects Labour’s claim 95% taxpayers would not pay extra for its plans”

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/”nov/21/general-election-2019-corbyn-to-launch-labours-manifesto-of-hope-live-news?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

AND

“Lib Dem manifesto spending analysed: Eye-watering sums for young families but what about pensioners?”

https://www.itv.com/news/2019-11-20/lib-dem-manifesto-spending-analysed-eye-watering-sums-for-young-families-but-what-about-pensioners/

Maybe try here – where they are all compared!

Click to access Carl%20Emmerson%2C%202017%20General%20Election%2C%20manifesto%20analysis.pdf

“Young people who have turned 18 since 2026 could decide this election”

“It’s up to young people to mobilise in this election. Labour has entered no electoral pacts; meanwhile, the Brexit Party has happily given one to the Tories. Sensible politics has been replaced by a singularly narrow focus on Brexit, with desperately needed policy debate on preventing climate breakdown sidelined, and no one seeming to care that it’s young people who will pay the price. The so-called adults won’t save us. We have to save ourselves. ….”

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/general-election-tactical-voting-young-people-register-brexit-a9211936.html

If you want to be a decider (of any age) go here:

https://www.gov.uk/register-to-vote

before 26 November

It takes lessthan 5 minutes.

Tories not to blame for poverty under a Tory government says Tory Minister Priti Patel

“The Conservatives have come under fire after a senior minister gave a disastrous interview claiming the government was “not to blame” for poverty.

Labour said the comments from Priti Patel, the home secretary, were another example of the “cruelty” of the Tory government, in a fresh blow to Boris Johnson’s election efforts.

It comes as the Conservatives complained about an interview Michael Gove gave to Channel 4, where the top Tory accused the broadcaster of political bias.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-news-live-general-election-bexit-polls-labour-manifesto-latest-a9211656.html

Note: this comes after news that Labour complained about bias at Sky where its general election set had “Brexit election” plastered all over it.

More Tory fake news – this time on housing policy

The Sun has this headline:

“Labour in La La Land

Jeremy Corbyn will force Brits to sell land at a fraction of the price so he can go on huge housebuilding drive’

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10389467/corbyn-seize-property-housebuilding-drive/

The reality:

Labour’s plan is for land to be sold to councils and developers at its value BEFORE planning permission can be applied for rather than as, at present, being sold AFTER planning permission has been granted.

That won’t please East Devon Green Party candidate Henry Gent, who currently stands to make millions of pounds on the option he has given to Persimmon to build hundreds of houses on his farm land.

If Corbyn gets his way, he would get only the agricultural value of the land – making it significantly cheaper to build houses.

They published their ideas in June 2019:

Click to access 12081_19-Land-for-the-Many.pdf

Kicked-out Tory Oliver Letwin understood the problem, but stopped short of offering a solution:

“Under the 1961 Land Compensation Act, councils are not permitted to buy agricultural land at its current value; instead they must pay a speculative “hope value”, based on the value of the land with permission to develop the site. That can easily make land more than 100 times more expensive than its actual worth. In his review of build-out rates (the report about the problem of land-banking that concluded that land-banking wasn’t a problem…), Oliver Letwin suggested that the residual land value of large sites should be capped at about 10 times their existing use value. Clearly better than paying 100 times the value – but does it go far enough?”

https://www.bdonline.co.uk/opinion/its-not-just-labour-thats-getting-behind-a-land-value-tax-/5099426.article

So this is both fake news and OLD news!

Cranbrook sports facilities not good enough – developers refuse to help

Penny-pinching in 2014, penny-pinching now.

“Cranbrook could be set to get a new bar and club room as part of facilities for the town’s sports hub – as the original plans for the site have been declared inadequate.

The sports hub at Cranbrook – known as Ingram’s field – has been up and running since May 2019, five years after it was initially conceived, and this summer finally saw football and cricket played in the new East Devon town.

The 2014 application for the site saw a design and layout for a changing room building also approved and five years later, the developers are finally in a position to deliver it.

However James Brown, Cranbrook New Community Manager, in a report to East Devon District Council’s cabinet, says that while it would meet the historic obligations, that design is not appropriate for today’s needs. …

He instead is proposing that the cabinet back plans that would see a bigger building built that would consists of six changing rooms, rather than four, and would also include a family room and a bar and club room.

The developers have said that they would invest only their original budget towards the newly enhanced pavilion and would not meet any additional costs, and have added that they are not prepared to undertake the design work and minor revisions to the building to bring it within budget. …”

https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/new-bar-sports-facilities-planned-3558292

Tory candidate sucks up to Carters at Greendale

Anyone who reads this blog knows the contempt it has for the Carters and the Greendale empire, which spreads its ever-growing tentacles throughout East Devon. Just put “Greendale” or “Carter” in the blog search box to see how they control many industries and landholdings (which they are notorious for extending by retrospective planning applications for or exploiting planning loopholes).

Now we read this from the parachuted-in East Devon Tory candidate on his Facebook page:

Great to welcome the Secretary of State for International Trade, Liz Truss, to #EastDevon. We visited two thriving businesses – Little Pod in Farringdon and Greendale Farm. I will always back business to create more jobs and opportunities. Check out the beard net!

Why would anyone vote for someone who gives this group publicity and support?

Well, Swire had his office in one of their properties, of course …

East Devon hustings – more information

Claire Wright has circulated hustings information (Owl has had no hustings i dormation from other candidates):

Below are all the hustings announced to date for East Devon and Claire will be attending all three.

Entry to the events is free but please note the following details:

Exmouth
November 28th 7:30 at Exmouth Community College

Exmouth – tickets must be reserved via Eventbrite. If no tickets are left for the event and you would like to attend, some of us may have spares, so please email us at volunteers@claire-wright.org

Cranbrook
December 3rd 7:30 at Cranbrook Education Campus

Cranbrook – the event will be held in a large hall. Again, spaces will be allocated on a first come first served basis, so don’t forget to arrive a little ahead of schedule.

Sidmouth
December 6th 7pm at All Saints Church

Sidmouth – the event will be held in a room for 300 guests. Spaces will be allocated on a first come first served basis on the night, so please arrive a little early.

The campaign has a very positive energy and it is wonderful to see so many people showing their support. Please follow Claire’s social media handles for updates on the election trail so far and don’t forget to share any posts. Let’s keep the positivity going!

“Housebuilding data shows dearth of homes for affordable renting”

“The number of new homes classed as social housing and available at the cheapest rents from councils remained historically low at a mere 6,287, the second-lowest level in peacetime since council house building began in earnest in 1921.

The shortfall in new affordable homes is likely to fuel householders’ reliance on the private rental market. New research also published on Wednesday showed such housing is almost completely unaffordable in many areas for people who rely on housing benefit, which has been frozen since 2016.

In a third of areas of England fewer than 10% of homes are now affordable to welfare recipients, according to a study by the Chartered Institute of Housing and the homelessness charity Crisis. That meant increasing numbers of people were being pushed into homelessness or forced to live in emergency or temporary accommodation, the charity said. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/nov/20/housebuilding-data-shows-dearth-of-homes-for-affordable-renting?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

“Guidance recommends sale of risky [council] investment properties”

“Councils should consider disposing of investment properties if they are unable to set aside enough reserves to cover potential losses, according to new guidance.

The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) this week released long-awaited guidance on investment in property, prompted by concerns over the levels of risk being taken by local authorities in recent years. …”

Guidance recommends sale of risky investment properties

Did our Tory candidate give his boss this advice?

A goid question for hustings?

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/20/twitter-accuses-tories-of-misleading-public-in-factcheck-row?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Casino councils (EDDC would like to be one)

EDDC story:

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2019/11/04/eddc-a-casino-council/

“Gloucester city council has bought a local retail park for £54 million, almost four times its net annual budget.

It acquired St Oswalds from Hammerson, the FTSE 250 shopping centre owner that is seeking to sell all its out-of-town properties. Tenants at the site include B&Q, Homesense and Mothercare, which went into administration this month.

A spokeswoman for the council said that it could not yet comment on the acquisition because of a non-disclosure agreement.

Councils have spent hundreds of millions of pounds on commercial property in recent years as they try to create a rental income stream to plug funding cuts from central government. Some have sought to buy neglected shopping centres in their areas as part of regeneration plans.

However, critics have raised concerns about the extent to which councils have tied their futures to an uncertain property market. Retail park valuations have fallen sharply as a series of well-known store chains have fallen into administration or have used insolvency procedures to close shops or lower rents. Hammerson reported a 10.9 per cent fall in the value of its retail parks in the six months to the end of June.

The Conservative-led local authority in Gloucester created an £80 million property investment fund in 2017 to help to make up for a £2.6 million deficit anticipated for the subsequent five years. It said that it would borrow 100 per cent of the cash for the fund, indicating that it would seek to find money from the Public Works Loan Board, the government body that issues loans to councils for capital projects.

The Treasury has started to crack down on risky property acquisitions by local authorities by increasing interest rates on new loans from the board. Before last month, the government charged an interest rate margin of 0.8 percentage points over the gilt rate; this has more than doubled to 1.8 percentage points over the gilt rate.

Last month Robert Jenrick, the housing secretary, criticised local authorities that had used borrowing from the board to buy “quite risky assets” outside their areas. He cited shopping centres, which he said “may well not turn out to be good investments at all and [are] only possible because the taxpayer is providing such attractive loans through the board”.

Source: The Times (pay wall)

The fakest of fake (Tory) news

Was Owl the only one who found this reprehensible?

“Tories pretend to be factchecking service during leaders’ debate

The Conservatives have been accused of misleading the public after they rebranded their official Twitter account as “factcheckUK” during the televised leaders’ debate and used it to publish anti-Labour posts.

The public have increasingly turned to factchecking websites, such as the independent Full Fact, the BBC’s Reality Check, Channel 4 News’ FactCheck and the Guardian’s Factcheck, to verify claims made by politicians.

During Tuesday night’s debate between Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn, the Conservative party renamed their main media account as “factcheckUK”, changed its logo to hide its political origins, and used it to push pro-Conservative material to the public. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/19/tories-tweet-anti-labour-posts-under-factcheckuk-brand?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Has Ingham broken purdah rules on Exmouth Queens Drive?

“Plans for a new Premier Inn for Kingsbridge and an Aldi for Ivybridge have been put on hold.

South Hams District Council were set to hold consultations with the public over the two schemes at the end of 2019, but they have now been delayed until the new year.

The delay has been blamed on the General Election being called and the pre-election Purdah period that means councils have to be careful not to do anything in public that could sway a member of the public to vote for one person or political party. …”

https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/general-election-puts-premier-inn-3554630

“Nine in 10 NHS bosses say staffing crisis endangering patients”

“Hospitals are so short of doctors and nurses that patients’ safety and quality of care are under threat, senior NHS leaders have warned in a dramatic intervention in the general election campaign

Nine out of 10 hospital bosses in England fear understaffing across the service has become so severe that patients’ health could be damaged. In addition, almost six in 10 (58%) believe this winter will be the toughest yet for the service.

The views expressed by senior NHS figures on Tuesday will heighten the anxiety in Conservative ranks that the health service’s growing problems risk derailing the party’s campaign in an election members hoped would be dominated by Brexit.

The Labour party is seeking to capitalise on public dissatisfaction over delays in accessing treatment and the increasingly visible gaps in staffing.

In a further sign of Tory concern, ministers have agreed an extraordinary deal for the NHS to pay doctors’ pension tax bills this year, which could cost hundreds of millions of pounds.

The scheme is aimed at halting the sharp recent increase in doctors working fewer shifts in order to avoid being hit with unexpected tax bills of up to £100,000. The trend has forced hospitals to cancel thousands of operating lists and outpatient clinics, while further delaying patients’ access to care and exacerbating staff shortages.

Ministers hope doctors in England – the only country the incentive will apply in – will see it as a green light to resume extra shifts before winter pressures ramp up on the NHS, without having to worry that they will be heavily penalised months later.

However, the deal immediately triggered claims that it has been agreed between ministers and NHS England in defiance of “purdah” rules that stipulate that governments must not undertake changes of policy during an election campaign.

It is being presented as an “operational decision” by NHS England, but was signed off – and some believe instigated – by the Treasury, Cabinet Office and the Department of Health and Social Care.

A senior medical source involved in brokering the unprecedented “stopgap” policy suggested it came about because ministers were “desperate” to avoid fewer shifts by doctors compounding hospitals’ struggles this winter.

The source said: “They have so massively breached purdah regulations it’s unbelievable. This isn’t an operational matter. This is policy. It’s outrageous, because purdah rules say that you can’t announce a change of policy during an election.”

The 131 chief executives, chairs and directors of NHS trusts in England expressed their serious concern about the deteriorating state of the service in a survey conducted by the NHS Confederation.

The findings came days after the latest official figures showed that hospitals’ performance against key waiting times for A&E care, cancer treatment and planned operations had fallen to its worst ever level. However, many service chiefs told the confederation that delays will get even longer when the cold weather creates extra demand for care.

“There is real concern among NHS leaders as winter approaches and this year looks particularly challenging,” said Niall Dickson, the chief executive of the confederation, which represents most NHS bodies, including hospital trusts, in England.

“Health leaders are deeply concerned about its ability to cope with demand, despite frontline staff treating more patients than ever.

“There is the very real prospect of gaps in clinical shifts and patients not receiving the quality of care they need because NHS trusts do not have the staff they need.”

“Despite doing everything within their power, 90% of health leaders we surveyed said that understaffing was putting patients at risk.

“We have 100,000 clinical vacancies [in England] and the prospect of ever-rising demand unless we face up to the scale of the challenge,” added Dickson.

Last week’s figures showed that one in four people who attend a hospital-based A&E are waiting more than four hours to be dealt with, record numbers are having to wait on a trolley while they are found a bed and seven of the eight clinically vital cancer treatment targets are being missed.

Dickson added that, even if the next government provided more money to tackle widespread staff shortages, it would take time to reduce the high vacancy rates that are common in many hospitals. The NHS is short of about 43,000 nurses and almost 10,000 doctors as well as paramedics and other health professionals.

He warned political parties not to raise voters’ expectations unreasonably in the run-up to polling on 12 December about how quickly the NHS can get back on track.

“More investment is needed but even with that this is a system that will take time to turn around and the electorate must not be fed with overpromises over the coming weeks,” he said.

The King’s Fund voiced concern at the results of the research. “Amidst the political rhetoric of the general election campaign, these findings underline the stark reality facing patients across the country who are struggling to access NHS services,” said Sally Warren, the thinktank’s director of policy.

“Workforce shortages are already having a direct impact on the quality of people’s care, with national patient surveys repeatedly highlighting difficulties for patients accessing NHS services and performance against key waiting time targets at their worst in over a decade.

“These NHS leaders are correct – without urgent action patient safety will be at risk.”

The confederation’s survey of 131 hospital bosses also found that:

76% say staff shortages are the NHS’s most pressing problem.

83% say the dispute over senior doctors’ pensions is making understaffing even worse.

69% say doctors deciding to work fewer hours is damaging patient care.

98% say the deepening crisis in social care is leading to more older people needing hospital care.”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/nov/19/nine-in-10-nhs-bosses-say-staffing-crisis-endangering-patients?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Ingham digs a deeper hole for himself on Queen’s Drive Exmouth

“Speaking at an exhibition event outlining consultation feedback on a vision for phase three of the seafront regeneration, Councillor Ben Ingham initially claimed residents in Exmouth had a choice between the two.

The suggestion of a four-storey hotel was among those pitched for the final phase during the two-day exhibition at Ocean.

He later corrected himself, adding that if a hotel or a council tax increase were not acceptable, another alternative would have to be found to plug a £3 million gap.

The district council needs to find the money in order to pay for the realignment of the Queen’s Drive road and car park which formed the first phase of development.

Speaking after the event, Cllr Ingham said: “At the moment, the best and most credible option is the hotel but not to build it and sell it, but to build it and lease it.”

https://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/exmouth-seafront-hotel-is-best-option-1-6382010

“48 of 151 members of elite club [very rich people] have given almost £52m”

” … one-third of UK’s richest people donate to Tories
No fewer than 48 of 151 members of elite club have given almost £52m, Labour analysis finds ..”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/conservatives-general-election-donors-billionaire-john-mcdonnell-labour-a9208036.html