Cranbrook grows and grows and grows and needs more and more and more EDDC staff – but not everyone there is happy

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Challenge-East-Devon-Council-Cranbrook-grows/story-24058013-detail/story.html

Which makes it all the more strange that the EDDC Economic Development Officer – who had formerly spent so much time administering the meetings of the East Devon Business Forum – was allowed to leave … still, that’s at least one salary that can be put to good use. Though, of course, we cannot have another Economic Development Manager for the next two years if he was made redundant.

What an odd situation. Just at the time when you need someone doing Economic Development, the post disappears.

And it seems as if they really do need all hands on deck if the following reader’s letter on the Express and Echo website is to be believed:

CRANBROOK should conjure up the urban dream nestled in the countryside; certainly the offices of the builders, with their impressive flower displays, manicured grass, trees, and shrubs, lure prospective buys on into a place where there is no infrastruture, no green spaces, and cramped housing conditions.

The reality of the place is like most things of today, all show and no heart.  It is a place for the young and inexperienced, with lots of children and dogs for company.  Most of them don’t live there, they go to work early and return late, lucky them. As more building continues, I think we can call it Cramped Cranbrook.

Name and address withheld
http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Reader-8217-s-Letter-Cranbrook-urban-dream/story-24101052-detail/story.html

the missing 6,000+ voters: instructions given to Electoral Registration Officers in 2013

In 2013 Electoral Registration Officers were issued with new instructions about how they should register voters – the annual canvass was postponed so that the new way of registering voters (individually and not by head of household) would be as accurate as possible.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/794/contents/made

and

The Electoral Registration (Disclosure of Electoral Registers) Regulations 2013

The latter included the following – and yet our Electoral Registration still managed to lose more than 6,000 voters from the electoral roll that year:

… “5. It is particularly important that a comprehensive canvass is conducted in 2013-14 in order to achieve as complete and accurate registers as possible ahead of the transition to IER. This will help to maximise the number of electors who can be ‘confirmed’ during the transition, which will in turn help to reduce the number of electors that EROs will need to follow up with and invite to register individually.

6. As always, EROs will need to ensure that they have robust plans in place for the annual canvass process and should also review their risk registers to ensure that any additional or different risks and related mitigating action have been identified and are reflected.”


9. Although the timing of the 2013 canvass has changed, the processes to be followed will be the same as in any other year. EROs are still legally required to take all steps that are necessary for the purposes of maintaining the electoral register, including:

• sending more than once to any address the form to be used for the canvass
• making on one or more occasions house-to-house enquiries
• making contact by such other means as the ERO thinks appropriate with persons who do not have an entry in the register
• inspecting any records held by any person which the ERO is permitted to inspect
• providing training to persons under their direction or control in connection with the carrying out of the duty

…15. Once decisions have been taken as to when and how the house-to-house enquiry part of their canvass will be carried out, EROs should establish how many canvassers will be needed and when, and put in place plans to ensure that sufficient staff can be recruited, trained and supervised to carry out house-to-house enquiries. EROs’ plans should also reflect how, when and on what basis canvassers will be paid.

16. EROs should bear in mind that existing or experienced canvassers may not be available for part or all of the revised canvass period or willing to work at the required times, and that they may therefore need to undertake additional recruitment exercises, targeting new or different groups. The timing of recruitment should be planned to take into account the likely increased demand for seasonal and temporary staff in other local businesses in the run-up to and during the festive period.

17. Any additional or different risks arising from carrying out house-to-house enquiries at a different time should be identified in the ERO’s risk register and appropriate mitigating action put in place. This might include, for example, risks associated with canvassing in bad weather or when there are limiteddaylight hours, and how these can be addressed through canvasser training and supervision.

…27. EROs should take steps to make local political parties and elected representatives aware of the changed register publication date at an early stage.

On-going registration work following publication of the register
28. The duty to maintain the register and undertake the steps set out in Section 9A of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (as amended) appliesthroughout the year and is not altered by the postponement of the 2013 canvass. Continuing registration work following the publication of the revised registers in early 2014 will enable EROs to ensure that they have carried out all of the necessary steps by the time of the scheduled 2014 polls, which means that the register used for the 2014 polls will be as up to date as possible, and will also help to maximise the number of electors who are successfully confirmed during the transition to IER, thus reducing the amount of follow-up work that EROs will be required to do to contact those who have not been confirmed and invite them to register.

Council, developers, secret meeting in the last month …..

Simply inputting into Google the search terms “council developer secret meetings uk” and reducing searches tonthe last month only brings up, amongst many other examples, these interesting results:

http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/2014/motion-for-transparency-in-planning-decisions-voted-down-by-tories

http://www.wigantoday.net/news/local/counciller-secretly-met-with-developers-1-6882202

http://www.thanetgazette.co.uk/VIDEO-Councillor-chased-leaving-meeting-secret/story-23187514-detail/story.html

http://www.westsussextoday.co.uk/news/letters/letter-secret-meetings-over-development-1-6376761

http://www.leek-news.co.uk/Housing-sites-Staffordshire-Moorlands-remain/story-23719089-detail/story.html

How do you do a representative telephone survey when many people are ex-directory – and its implications for our missing 6,000 plus voters

http://www.middevongazette.co.uk/Poll-junction-27-development-flawed-campaigners/story-23972600-detail/story.html

an interesting point for us is the remark that:

“RDD uses the Mid Devon telephone directory as a sample frame for all Mid-Devon households,” he said. The latest figures from BT, which includes non-BT numbers, shows that ‘the ex-directory figure currently stands at 58% of people registered with the UK Telephone Number Database. Added to that the latest figures from Ofcom show that 16% of the UK homes are now mobile only. I believe it is fair to assume that this figure will hold true in Mid Devon, which means that one in six residents were excluded from the ICM study on that basis.

If we combine both factors by my reckoning that means only 35% of Mid Devon households both have a landline and are listed in the phone directory. To put it another way, the developers’ study excluded 65% of the Mid Devon population. That’s before taking into account the response rates, time of day they called, etc. but they won’t share any further details with me.

“It is quite difficult to imagine how the developers can claim that the locals are behind them when they excluded the bulk of us from their research.”

This, of course, has implications for our missing 6,000 plus voters missing from our electoral roll, since our CEO said to the Parliamentary Committee examining his registration methods, that his choice of using telephone canvassing rather than house to house visits, was superior.

How it can be superior in these circumstances is at best questionable. And we see from a recent Freedom of Information request, he has been asked when, how and with what resources and what results he conducted the telephone surveys.

The response will be extremely interesting.

Three Dorset councils merge all admin functions

Three separate councils and councillors will remain but will share a CEO and all admin functions:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-29870925

Where Dorset leads will East Devon, Mid-Devon, Teignbridge and/or Exeter follow? It is said the Dorset councils will save around £200 million a year.

Celebrity stops development

What you can do when you are a celebrity:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2817559/Great-save-Coleen-sees-bid-developers-build-15-new-houses-Roo-view-5million-mansion.html

or anyone else with more influence than the ordinary resident.

No comment

“….. Not the only cosy developer relationship going on with the Council/Planning Department. Several villages have been on the receiving end of bizarre planning committee approvals for “favoured” developers. Planning applications that clearly breach all government guidelines, parish plans, huge amount of local objections etc. but still get approved. Most developers start the work and even advertise new properties before the application is formally approved. …..”

http://www.stratford-herald.com/29743-exclusive-private-meetings-with-developer-to-be-investgated.html

Information Commissioner v East Devon District Council – update

http://futuresforumvgs.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/knowle-relocation-project-analysis-of.html

EDDC canvassers now out trying to find the missing 6,000 plus electors

After boasting to the Parliamentary Select Committee on voter engagement that his way of tracking down missing voters was far superior to the required door to door canvassing done everywhere else (by telephoning missing voters instead – always assuming you know their landline or mobile numbers) Mark Williams has now recruited a large team of canvassers to do the job.

Wonder what caused the change …..!

http://new.eastdevon.gov.uk/news/2014/10/home-visits-aim-to-boost-number-of-residents-registered-to-vote/

Knowle relocation documents withheld by EDDC ..latest update

See http://saveoursidmouth.com/2014/10/30/tribunal-judgement-further-delayed/

Cabinet agenda 5 November 2014 5.30 pm

Click to access 051114-cabinet-combined-agenda-public-version.pdf

Summary: Lots of secret items and lots of money to be thrown at increasing the size of Cranbrook and lots of words but not much action in Seaton and Exmouth

Gunpowder, treason and plot?

Knowle relocation: Deputy Chief Executive’s “update”

… which raises many more questions than it answers:

http://new.eastdevon.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/committees-and-meetings/overview-and-scrutiny-committee/minutes/16-october-2014/office-relocation-update/

and simply “noting” this report at an Overview and Scrutiny meeting is disgraceful.

Our Overview and Scrutiny Committee – not so much a toothless tiger as a toothless teddy bear.

Large retail park near Cranbrook names stores

… which leaves one wondering which stores will feel the need to be in Cranbrook too when they will be a short car/bus ride away

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Fears-city-centre-list-big-stores-unveiled-new/story-23733009-detail/story.html

Devon Clinical Care Commissioning – explaining the deficit – some questions councillors might ask

Devon CCG says that community hospitals must be closed because they are in deficit.

A look at their annual report for 2014 is illuminating. Whereas salaries appear reasonable (e.g. Chief Executive £130-135,000 per year when perks are added in it is a different story (see page 29 of cited report)

Chief Executive: salary £130,000 – £135,000
With pension etc £275,000 – £280,000

Chairman: salary £80,000 – £85,000
With benefits: £200,000 – £205,000

Locality Managing Directors: salary £100,000 – £105,000
With benefits: £145,000 – £150,000

In a world where most employees get minimal contributions towards their pensions how on earth can doubling up on salary be justified?

Using the government’s own workplace pension contribution calculator a salary of £135,000 shows an employer contribution of £36,000.

Click to access CCG_Annual_Report_2013-2014.pdf

https://www.moneyadviceservice.org.uk/en/tools/workplace-pension-contribution-calculator

Appeal Court to rule on when Environmental Impact Assessments are required

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=20588:appeal-judges-to-hear-key-issue-for-challenges-to-planning-permissions-on-eia-grounds&catid=63&Itemid=31

Newton Poppleford planning decisions “contradictory”

Yes, most of us have realised that. Why was it ok for one developer and not for another?

Of course, a re-convening of the EDDC wokring group that was supposed to look into the relationship between the council and the East Devon Business Forum might well have answered such questions ….. yet another reason why it remains in the long grass …

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/East-Devon-planning-decisions-8216-contradictory/story-23728802-detail/story.html

Hugo Swire votes against sacking MPs

Here’s the e-mail sent on Tuesday this week (27 October), to an EDA correspondent, from the 38 degrees team:

‘Last night (Monday 27 Oct) your MP, Hugo Swire voted the wrong way. [1]

Yesterday, MPs voted on whether to give voters the power to sack misbehaving MPs. [2] The majority voted no, choosing to stick with the government’s recall law that takes this power out of our hands.

Days like these can be pretty disheartening. They remind us there’s a huge gap between the political system we want and the political system we have.

This won’t be the last opportunity MPs have to vote on this. It could technically be possible to get the changes we want. But, to be honest, it’s pretty unlikely. Not enough MPs are convinced that voters should decide when and why an MP gets sacked.

If you’d like to email your MP, Hugo Swire, and ask him why he voted against giving voters more power, please click here:
https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/real-recall-wrong-way

If you email your MP, you’ll notice that the candidates standing against them at the next election (if they have any yet!) will be copied in. This is important because it’ll show them the sort of things that voters in your area care about.

There are several options for next steps on our campaign. But for today, it feels right to pause and take stock of how far we’ve come. Together, we’ve convinced a huge chunk of MPs that voters should have the power over whether to sack MPs. Sadly, this time it wasn’t enough.

We’ve come along way on this campaign. But if there’s one thing this vote shows us, it’s that we’ve got a hell of a job to do! Although it’s an uphill struggle sometimes, this one vote isn’t enough to stop us.’

PS: If you’d like to read more about the vote, and take part in the discussions about what 38degrees does next, please click here:
https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/recall-next-steps

‘I have never experienced a stranger council than EDDC!’

In a long letter in today’s edition of Pullman’s View from Sidmouth , an Axminster resident, berates EDDC for the strange way in which it operates. In a phrase echoing one by Clive Aslet in his Daily Telegraph article ‘Sidmouth Mans the Barricades, the author of the letter, Michael Blagrove, says, “I am glad that I am not alone in detecting a nasty smell emanating from The Knowle… the unmistakable whiff of aloofness and unaccountability.” Mr Blagrove goes on to explain why in his experience, “the officers of the council seem to be under the impression that they are rather too grand to act as “public servants” in the accepted manner..” He is particularly scathing about the Chief Executive’s dual role in South Somerset and East Devon, commenting that ” He may well consider himself to be a jack of all trades, but clearly he is master of none.”
The letter can be viewed in full at http://www.viewfromonline, Tues Oct 28th 2014.
Clive Aslet, Editor-at-Large of Country Life, made some similar observations after a visit to Sidmouth two years ago. See final paragraph of his report at this link http://saveoursidmouth.com/2012/10/23/save-our-sidmouth-reaches-the-daily-telegraph/