Grass roots community action in Athens

“Navarinou Park – part playground, part open-air cinema, part vegetable garden and verdant oasis – was never meant to be. On that, all of its participants agree. Stavros Stavrides, a professor of architecture at Athens’ National Technical University, is the first to say it; so, too, do the local residents who, spade in hand, also worked to transform an unprepossessing parking lot on the rim of Athens’ edgy Exarcheia district into a vibrant community garden.

“Who’d have thought?” asks Effie Saroglou, a dancer, walking her dark-haired mutt around the park. “Who’d have imagined us ever sitting here?” says Yannis Mandris, a musician, watching a grainy rendition of Blade Runner in a makeshift arena on the other side of the lot. Something is stirring in the Greek capital – and in more ways than one Navarinou Park has come to represent it.

Stavrides calls it a movement, a new form of commons in which public-spirited individuals reclaim public space; others an informal urbanism born of a spirit of solidarity that has taken hold since Europe’s economic crisis erupted in Greece in 2009. For in Navarinou – a place run by neighbourhood committee – citizens have sought new ways of overcoming the trauma of economic collapse. And they have done so by creating a place where, self-contained and seemingly beyond the reach of authority, they can meet, converse, play and produce food.

Bereft of civic protection and the great umbrella of the welfare state, grassroots groups across Athens have followed suit. …

… “What we are witnessing is an explosion of social networks born of bottom-up initiatives,” says Stavrides, who was among the activists whose spontaneous efforts stopped [a parking lot] being turned into a parking space in late 2009. “Navarinou heralded this new culture, this new spirit of people taking their lives into their own hands. They know that they can no longer expect the state to support them and through this process, they are discovering how important it is to share.”

“Increasingly, local associations, resident committees and solidarity groups are forging ties, exchanging know-how, giving shape to new concepts of co-existence, and in so doing, reshaping public space.

“The crisis has made a lot of Greeks want to work together,” says Lydia Carras, who oversees the long-established Elliniki Etairia Society for the Environment and Cultural Heritage from a building at the foot of the Acropolis. “There is a new mood of cooperation because people understand that the only way to get their voice heard is to make alliances.”

http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/sep/21/athens-unofficial-community-hope-government-failures?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

New Facebook Group: Devon United – Doing Democracy Differently

Inaugural Meeting: Tue 4 October 2016 18:00 – 21:30
Newton Abbot Races Ltd
Newton Road
Kingsteignton

Everyone very welcome – Paul Hilder is coming to talk to us all about localism and retaking democracy and there will be lots of discussion about the next county elections and how we can unite to be a challenge.

Free tickets can be obtained via:

https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/devon-united-doing-democracy-differently-tickets-27679676658

Devon United is a group of local people who want to see a change in the way our elected County Councillors work and represent us and believe that moving beyond party politics is the way to do it.

We will be joined by Paul Hilder, co-founder of OpenDemocracy.net and CrowdPac and former global campaigns director for Avaaz and Change.org who will share his insights on how people can make real change happen.

We are fed up of our communities being sidelined by our councils and having no voice in the decisions that affect our communities. We are being ignored about the loss of our community hospitals, care units and services for our young people, ignored over planning decisions that see enormous estates being built around our small country towns that do not have the infrastructure to cope and are unaffordable to local people, ignored and misled over devolution and enough is enough.

We want to put our communities first and elect accountable, transparent and open County Councillors to represent our views at next years County Council elections.

We will discuss how we would like our politicians to operate, how we can identify the best candidates and how we can work together to campaign and organise in our communities to make plans and find inspiration to make our county work for everyone.”

Come along and let’s Do Democracy Differently

Swire works for ….. judge for yourself

Comment reposted:

Here is what Hugo has asked or spoken about since he became a back bencher:

The effect of Brexit on English students studying in Scotland

The effect of Brexit on foreign students studying in England (using Exeter Uni as an example – Ben Bradshaw’s constituency)

Progress of superfast broadband in Devon and Somerset and whether the SoS for CMS met BT to discuss broadband rollout in general

Four questions about the funding of the A30 upgrade east of Honiton and whether it will be dual carriageway (Neil Parish’s constituency)

Empty houses

Of course, the answers are pretty non-committal, so we learn nothing of real interest from these questions. Personally I would have thought that, with his many years experience as a minister successfully wriggling out of providing meaningful answers, he might be somewhat better at asking questions which would be specific enough to generate a useful answer..

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?q=&pid=11265&phrase=&exclude=&from=2016-07-15&to=&person=&section=&column=#n4

“Four out of seven north-east councils vote against devolution Sunderland, Durham, South Tyneside and Gateshead reject proposals including election of north-eastern mayor”

” … Paul Watson, chair of the North East Combined Authority (Neca) of the seven councils, described the vote as disappointing. He said: “Each of the seven councils which make up the Neca has always made clear that they support the principle of devolution for the north-east. Following the outcome of the EU referendum and the subsequent changes within government, council leaders have been equally clear that to move forward, the new government must provide assurances regarding the terms of the region’s devolution deal.

“Extensive discussions and negotiations have taken place with government and within the region over recent months but unfortunately, despite our best efforts, it has not been possible to reach an agreement which all of the seven local authorities feel able to support. Although this is disappointing we will continue to work together with government to achieve our ambition of a stronger regional economy with improved opportunities for residents and businesses.” …

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/sep/06/north-east-councils-vote-against-devolution-sunderland-durham-south-tyneside-gateshead

Compare and contrast with Devon and Somerset where councils are happy to vote like sheep for devolution, knowing almost nothing about, having been given minimal information by their Leaders and their business pals on the Local Enterprise Partnership.

Private is private but public is scrutiny – but by whom?

Owl thinks private lives should be private – but if you have a public life that puts you in direct conflict with that private life (such as heading an inquiry into drugs and prostitution) then you should be prepared to be held to account. But who does that accounting?

The Daily Telegraph explains the difficulty:

The Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament is clear: “Members should act on all occasions in accordance with the public trust placed in them. They should always behave with probity and integrity …”

During a parliamentary career that has lasted almost 30 years so far, Keith Vaz has faced many questions about how well he lived up to that standard. …

… His chairmanship of the Commons Home Affairs committee does not just give him a prominent public position and an additional salary, it also gives him regular direct contact with senior ministers and officials, and privileged access to some of the most sensitive official information about matters of crime and national security.

In short, Parliament has chosen to ignore all of the questions about Mr Vaz’s conduct over many years and reward him with a position of great power and responsibility.

Time and time again, serious concerns have been raised about the “integrity and probity” of Mr Vaz. Every time, the parliamentary authorities have failed to investigate those concerns with the tenacity or objectivity requited to give the public full confidence in their findings and in Parliament as a whole.

This newspaper has argued over many years that MPs sadly cannot be trusted to police their own conduct, calling instead for independent oversight, perhaps from a body similar to the US Office of Congressional Ethics, an independent watchdog solely composed of non-politicians.

Mr Vaz is living proof of why politicians cannot be trusted to regulate themselves.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2016/09/04/keith-vaz-is-living-proof-that-mps-cannot-be-trusted-to-regulate/

“Hinkley Point deal out of date and too expensive, says energy chief “

The head of energy giant ScottishPower has waded into the row over Hinkley Point, insisting that the controversial subsidy deal for EDF’s proposed nuclear plant should be renegotiated because it is too expensive.

Keith Anderson, the firm’s chief corporate officer, said the deal, provisionally agreed by the Government in 2013 following lengthy negotiations, no longer made sense in the light of lower gas and offshore wind costs.

“It looks like a contract that was written five years ago on a business case that was probably pulled together 10 years ago. It looks out of line with what’s going on in the market now,” he said. …”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/09/03/hinkley-point-deal-out-of-date-and-too-expensive-says-energy-chi/

The article raises very serious concerns about the business sense of our Local Enterprise Partnership, which seems blind to the economic realities of the Hinkley C project.

We know, of course, that many members of our LEP have enormous direct and indirect investment in the project and presumably need it to continue to allow their own interests to thrive.

But is it in OUR interest to allow them to trouser likely profits from such an unbalanced deal?

They will say that they are doing this for our benefit, of course – more jobs, more houses, etc. But with Brexit we now look towards having fewer people coming to this country from the EU (though exceptions would doubtless be made for French and Chinese workers) and much higher import costs if we do not have free trade in the EU. Plus the business case for renewables is strengthening all the time, especially as battery storage research and implementation has made enormous progress.

Our LEP members know all this but only last week its CEO was telling us how hard he and his members are battling to keep the project going:

http://us4.campaign-archive2.com/?u=4e59660292bd6b4a5c7d7b8a7&id=a36a037523&e=fa5cdb1f1

We have to ask: who are they battling for – and why?

The great scandal of LEPs now lies before us: small (very small) groups of business people who look to their own interests before those of the residents where they live. Often in secret and with minimal or no scrutiny. And who pursue their own interests even when they put them at odds with the majority of people in the areas they purportedly represent.

Our East Devon Business Forum seems to have been a practice run for our Local Enterprise partnership, and we all know how that ended – also coincidentally in the Daily Telegraph:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/9921333/If-I-turn-a-green-field-into-an-estate-then-Im-not-doing-it-for-peanuts.html

“Bonanza of Brexit Lobbying” including £3,000 to be in Theresa May’s company

“The Conservatives are selling access to Theresa May and other ministers for more than £3,000 a head to corporate executives and lobbyists at their party conference this autumn.

The executives will pay for the chance to attend a lunch session with the prime minister and a dinner with the chancellor, as well as more intimate “round table” sessions with ministers relevant to their industry.

The practice of charging corporate executives for access to ministers emerged under David Cameron, with the “business day” originally priced at around £1,000 a head for a session with the former prime minister and chancellor.

A new corporate brochure for the Tory party conference shows the price for attending the business day and dinner has now surged to £3,150 per person for the chance to be in the presence of May and her new government ministers.

The prime minister is listed as giving a question and answer session over lunch, with pictures of past events showing ministers mingling on tables with businesspeople.

In separate sessions, three Treasury ministers will host a talk billed as “Treasury insights” and business ministers will host a “partnering with business” session.

The website advertising the event features a picture of May, along with the claim that business day “offers representatives from the business community the opportunity to engage in discussion with senior Conservative politicians”.

May’s decision to participate in the event hints that she is not intending to break from Cameron’s previous approach to lobbying, despite her claims to want to run a country for the many not the few and tackle “vested interests” in the corporate world.

Tamasin Cave of the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Spinwatch, said it was “very concerning and worrying” that May was planning to “continue with politics as normal under David Cameron”.

She said there is a “bonanza of Brexit lobbying” coming down the tracks for May to deal with at a time when the public has little faith that politicians will stand up to powerful corporate interests.

“People do not trust establishment politicians on this issue of lobbying. She has a big problem on her hands, which she does not seem to understand,” Cave said.

Asked about the event selling access to May and other ministers, a Conservative spokesman said: “This is an important opportunity to engage directly with businesses and to highlight how, as part of our plan to create an economy that works for everyone, we will continue to back business and enterprise.”

Labour also has a “business forum” founded at around the same time, charging around £899 for a ticket and giving access to unspecified “politicians and leading businesspeople”.

The Lib Dem corporate event has gone down in price since the party declined in influence and left government, with a ticket costing just £240 to attend compared with £800 for their business day and £350 for their business dinner in 2014.

May will face calls to clamp down on lobbying next week, when Lord Brooke, a Labour peer, tables a private member’s bill arguing for the replacement of the current ineffective lobbying register with a genuine register that records who people are lobbying, their client, the type of influence they are seeking and how much they are spending.

Unlock Democracy, a campaign group, said the bill would bring the UK into line with other institutions such as the US, EU and Scotland.

“It’s time for Theresa May to put clear blue water between her and Cameron. She can set the tone for her premiership by backing real lobbying transparency,” it said.”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/sep/01/lunch-with-theresa-may-thatll-will-be-3150

“Progressive Alliance only alternative to Tories”

“… It is going to be very hard to get a progressive pact to happen. Jeremy Corbyn, who one might have expected to have been sympathetic to the idea, has seemingly ruled it out – even for the specific case of Caroline Lucas, the Green Mp for Brighton, who is much closer to Corbyn politically than the great majority of Labour MPs.

But to be fair to Corbyn, he is in the middle of a bruising leadership election. It would be challenging for the Leader of the Opposition, in the middle of such an election campaign, to come out in favour of acting with other parties. It would have required great vision and bravery.

Corbyn is highly likely to win the leadership election. Once he has done so, and with Labour almost certainly continuing to struggle internally and in the opinion polls, then my bet is that he will think again, and start to face reality: without a progressive alliance, Labour will be destroyed by the Conservatives. But with such an alliance, a better future is possible.” …

http://www.theecologist.org/blogs_and_comments/commentators/2988069/progressive_alliance_is_now_the_only_alternative_to_the_tories.html

Cameron aides given massive pay rises before he left office

“David Cameron gave some of his special advisers bumper pay rises just months before they were given generous severance packages, it has been reported.

The former prime minister upped the salary of some of his advisers by as much as £18,000 – or up to 24%, according to an analysis by Civil Service World.

The double-digit hikes were ordered despite pay rises being capped at 1% across the public sector. Trade unions and taxpayer groups said the increases were “shameful” at a time when government departments have faced cuts. …

… Seven out of 10 of the Downing Street advisers reappointed after last year’s general election – and who therefore became entitled to bigger severance packages – received pay rises of up to 24% in 2015, according to Civil Service World. This far outstripped the 2% average pay award across the private sector in 2015.”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/aug/30/david-cameron-gave-pay-rise-of-24-to-some-special-advisers-before-resignation

The huge pay rises also affected their redundancy packages, which were increased from four and a half months pay to six months:

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/15/cameron-gave-aides-extra-severance-pay-against-official-advice

We were NOT all in it together – only the cronies, many of whom also got gongs from Cameron (along with his friend Hugo Swire).

Tory Dorset MP slams council mergers as anti-democratic

Plans to reorganise local government in Dorset in a bid to save cash are an “attack against democracy”, an MP has claimed.

Chief executives from all nine councils in the county presented four shake-up options at a meeting on Thursday night.

Proposals include the possible merger of Bournemouth, Poole, Christchurch and East Dorset.

Christchurch MP Chris Chope said merger plans would be “suicide” for residents.

Dorset’s councils said they receive £142m less per year in government funding now than in 2010-11, and need to cut spending by £200m a year by 2019-20, with further cuts of £30.4m estimated by 2025.

Anthony Alford, leader of West Dorset District Council and vice-chairman of the Dorset Leaders’ Growth Board, said considering change was “essential” in order to reduce costs “and ensure councils are sustainable for the future”.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-37196316

Aahh, a “Dorset Leaders Growth Board” – shades of our old East Devon Business Forum and our Local Enterprise Partnership! True, no democracy there!

Devolution Mayors – in or out? Who knows!

“Mayors can provide an answer to the questions of accountability raised by devolution, but they are not the only solution. These decisions should be informed by what works for local places, not by the demands of national politics.

The Times has reported that Theresa May is to abandon George Osborne’s plans for imposing regional mayors. The reported reason for the change of policy? The prime minister’s wish to avoid establishing ‘new powerbases’ for the moderate wing of the Labour party.

This is not a sound basis for policy making and plans for local devolution should not driven by national party politics. We should remember that a sensible devolved settlement is not just about what works for Westminster, but what works for areas like Manchester, Liverpool, Tees Valley and all the other regions around the country that are set to benefit from increased powers.

So far, DCLG has denied the claims, saying that mayors “remain the best way to make [deals] work”. Though the government stopped short of forcing it on local authorities, directly elected mayors were a core part of George Osborne’s strategy, and government attitudes seemed to be hardening on the issue over the course of 2016. But the DCLG statement does seem to leave room for the government to row back on the mandatory element of the mayor programme.

LGiU has always argued that the decision to establish a directly elected mayor should be a local one and that different models might be appropriate in different areas of the country.

Directly elected mayors can be very positive for a region: they can provide a figurehead and political voice for a region and speak on a national platform for the local community. They have lots of soft convening power and direct accountability to their electorate. Mayors could use their powerful local mandate to ensure that those operating within the local state are accountable and transparent while maintaining acceptable standards.

Mayors therefore provide one answer to questions around leadership and accountability at a local level – but they are not the only answer. There are plenty of other models for regional governance, from a rolling chairship to a committee structure. And there is certainly appetite for different models. Two-tier rural areas in particular have found it difficult to reconcile their ambitions for devolution with the introduction of a mayor. Other parts of the country have already voted against the idea of mayors in a local referendum. LGiU is continuing to explore these options.

It is not surprise that Labour MPs have realised that running a city is a bigger draw than spending years in opposition. However, Theresa May’s reasoning for a u-turn on mayors shouldn’t be politically driven – it should be about sharing prosperity and growth as well as increasing democracy and local accountability.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/opinion/2016/08/could-westminster-politics-end-march-mayors

Check where your councillors REALLY live!

“An ex-councillor has been jailed for two months after pleading guilty to supplying false information to an electoral registration officer.
Richard Smalley was elected to represent Allestree on Derby City Council, a safe Conservative ward.

According to a report on the BBC website, he had claimed on a form submitted to the electoral registration officer that he lived at an address in Allestree, when he actually lived in Borrowash, which is outside the city boundaries of Derby. He resigned ten days after he was elected.

Smalley subsequently pleaded guilty to a charge of ‘Supplying False Information to the Electoral Registration officer’ under s13D Representation of the People Act.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=28133%3Aformer-councillor-jailed-for-supplying-false-information-ahead-of-election&catid=59&Itemid=27

New broom CEO for South Somerset District Council

In July 2015, South Somerset District Council suddenly terminated an arrangement whereby they and East Devon District Council shared a CEO Mark Williams. This severance cost SSDC upwards of £100,000. No reason was given at the time but SSDC decided temporarily to have a management team without an overall CEO. Mark Williams, whose salary and hours had been shared 50/50 with SSDC returned to EDDC full-time (though we seem to have been managing quite well with his half-time the job split).

At the time the two councils seemed keen on sharing even more posts but the CEO post was the only one that ever emerged.

Fast forward a year and South Somerset now has a new CEO – Alex Parmley:

Alex is currently a Corporate Director at Eastleigh Borough Council where he leads a major business transformation programme, as well as the building of the new Fleming Park regional leisure centre, regeneration and regional schemes to support business growth and jobs through innovation and the green economy. Prior to working at Eastleigh, Alex was a Director and General Manager at Weymouth and Portland Borough Council and also worked at Parramatta City Council, Australia, leading the implementation of their City Strategy.”

http://www.southsomerset.gov.uk/latest-news/august-2016/alex-parmley-formally-confirmed-as-south-somerset-district-council%E2%80%99s-new-chief-executive/

For background on the old and new appointments see:

Click to access 8%20Recruitment%20of%20New%20CEO%20Report.pdf

Some things about this train of events will forever remain a mystery it seems.

Swire: spot what is missing

“I am pleased to be joining my close friends David Cameron, George Osborne and others on the backbenches. I feel deeply honoured and privileged to have served as a Minister of State – one of only three to have done so continuously from 2010- and loved my time both in the Northern Ireland Office and more recently the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

I have travelled more than any other Minister promoting the UK abroad both politically and in terms of trade. I have championed the Commonwealth and re-established links in Latin and Central America. I have been all over Asia, Australasia and the Pacific racking up the air miles and promoting our great country.

But all this comes at a price not only to me but my family and I shall be relieved not to have to embark on yet another exhausting trip for a while.”

https://www.hugoswire.org.uk/news/back-back-benches

Er, what about now having time to work for your constituents and perhaps seeking to relocate your second home from Mid Devon to East Devon?

Oh, Owl forgot – you are on holiday but you won’t tell us where. Still, wherever it is, it won’t be an exhausting trip.

Those air miles are going to be SO useful … for all the family – though as Mr Swire employs his wife in his office who will be answering the phone and the mail?

Election fraud: more names, no progress …

“Police in South Yorkshire are investigating MPs Sir Kevin Barron, John Healey and Sarah Champion after they allegedly failed to declare tens of thousands of pounds in the May 2015 election expenditure.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3751138/Police-probe-three-Labour-MPs-expenses-fraud-s-claimed-failed-declare-thousands-pounds-spent-staff-elected.html

“Councillors have no power”

“Sick of seeing Falmouth planning decisions overturned by centralised bodies with no local knowledge, one woman has launched a campaign to change the “undemocratic” planning process.

Kathryn Philpott has been spurred on to launch her petition, ‘Give Our Councils The Power To Make A Decision,’ after plans for Bosvale in Falmouth went to appeal at the Planning Inspectorate in Bristol, and plans for 94 homes at Poolfield in Budock were granted on appeal. Both had been refused permission by Cornwall Council following objections from Falmouth Town Council.

She said: “I think the most important thing I have realised is that our council has no real authority.

“Right through the county people are up in arms because their local councillors have got no power to stop building on inappropriate places.

“An issue for everyone here is that they have just passed out of county permission to build on the fields leading up to Budock Church. A stunningly beautiful area.

“It was taken off our council and taken out of county for the decision.”

She added: “Can someone tell me why we have a democratic vote to elect our counsellors to work on our behalf, protecting our county, as every time a planning issue arises and is turned down it immediately goes out of our county to a person or persons that know nothing about the wishes of the general public.

“We seem to have a democracy that is ill equipped to stand up for us. In fact it is very undemocratic to take a decision of this magnitude and sweep over our local council rendering them powerless.”

Kathryn has also said that having a Neighbourhood Plan in place would prevent developers “building everywhere” – a process which is already underway.

She is concerned that current developments pay no heed to problems like drainage and sewage, or to local amenity and open space.

But she is also worried that developers are rushing to get their planning applications in now, before Falmouth’s Neighbourhood Plan comes into effect, with designated areas for housing or other development, as well as areas that cannot be built on.

She said: “People are frantically putting their applications in because they want to get in before the Neighbourhood Plan comes into place, because that will be the end of this building.”

Kathryn wants appeals to go back to Cornwall Council for reconsideration rather than to the Planning Inspectorate, and is petitioning the government to give local councils the final say on planning decisions, not just in Cornwall but nationwide.

She needs 100,000 signatures if she is to hope to have the issue debated in parliament, and so needs her petition to circulate much further than Falmouth, although she has started a physical petition at Boslowick Garage for those without access to the internet.

She said: “Now is he time if people want to act. Now is their chance, but they have got to stand up and say, it’s people power.”

To sign the petition go to: http://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/give-our-councils-the-power-to-make-a-decision

http://m.falmouthpacket.co.uk/news/14687745.Falmouth_campaigner_wants_to_bring_planning_power_back_to_local_people/?ref=fbshr

Junk food lobbyists meet ministers more than 40 times

Why were the new obesity regulations watered down?

“Food industry lobbyists met health ministers 40 times before the Government issued its ‘watered-down’ obesity strategy, official records reveal.
Experts last night accused the Government of caving in to industry pressure – and warned that child obesity will continue to boom as a result. …

… In the past two years, former public health minister Jane Ellison met representatives of Coca-Cola, KFC, the powerful Food and Drink Federation and the Advertising Association trade group, according to Department of Health records.

The full list of 40 appointments, dating between July 2011 and March 2016, also includes meetings with Pizza Hut, Tesco and Nando’s. …”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3749791/Junk-food-firms-40-meetings-ministers-tougher-laws-scrapped.html

Hugo doing another Trump! Refuses to engage with Express and Echo

Donald Trump has banned several newspapers from his presidential campaign. Our own dear Hugo – after copying him with Twitter spats with other MPs see earlier posts – has now copied him again, this time severing all ties with the well-respected local Express and Echo newspaper – again announcing it on Twitter on 5 August:

image

(“Severing all ties with Express and Echo newspaper due to consistently biased and inaccurate reporting. Enough is enough”)

It seems that he is highly sensitive to criticism these days (again like Trump) and is dealing only with those newspapers which give him favourable column inches.

It cannot be too long before we hear in one of those rare visits to a Sidmouth shop (almost certainly Waitrose) those (in)famous words “Do you know who I am?”

Yes, indeed we do, indeed we do.

When it pays ( handsomely) to be sacked

George Osborne looks set to make hundreds of thousands of pounds a year on the after-dinner speaking circuit after he joined one of Washington DC’s most exclusive agencies.

The former chancellor has been given the green light by the civil service to join Washington Speakers Bureau after being sacked from the government by Theresa May.

While fees for the speakers are not made public, US reports have suggested “big names” can get $50,000 a speech while “top attractions” can get up to $300,000.

He joins a stellar class of politicians at the firm including former prime ministers Gordon Brown and Tony Blair and former US president George W Bush. …
…The Tory MP for Tatton’s new role was formally approved on Tuesday by the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments, which signs off jobs for former ministers to ensure there is no conflict of interest. …

He has promised to “personally approve any engagement to ensure that there is no conflict of interest” and must wait until three months after his sacking to take up the post.

Mr Osborne was also told by the committee that he “should not become personally involved in lobbying the UK Government on behalf of the Washington Speakers Bureau or its clients” for at least two years. …”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/16/george-osborne-expected-to-make-hundreds-of-thousands-after-join/

So, George, are you quite sure you know what lobbying means?

Companies House plan will hide Ministers’ links to firms, says Labour

“Historical links between ministers and former businesses will be hidden from the public if the government goes ahead with changes to Companies House, Labour has said.

Proposals to reduce the amount of time records of dissolved companies are retained could mean that the former directorships of 24 current Conservative ministers would no longer be accessible, research from the party suggests.

Their previous links to 48 now dissolved companies and organisations would be deleted either immediately or over the course of the parliament.

Ministers who could be affected include the chancellor, Philip Hammond, who is a former director of six dissolved companies; the home secretary, Amber Rudd; the defence secretary, Michael Fallon; and the health secretary, Jeremy Hunt. …”

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/aug/15/companies-house-plan-hide-tory-ministers-business-links-tom-watson-labour