Councillors disconnected from decision- making

This is an old report (December 2014) but raises some current pertinent issues. With the creation of “Greater Exeter”, the “East Devon Growth Point Enterprise Zone” and the with interference of the Local Enterprise Partnership in the devolution process, what now is the role of the back-bench councillor? Or even the councillors on the Cabinet who have not moved up the pecking-order to be involved in these new Quangos?

Is there still a role for councillors who are not in the Golden and Platinum Circles of power? Councillors in the ruling party and other parties who are increasingly isolated from decision-making at just about every level except the parochial (the natural domain of town and parish councillors)?

“A new study suggests there is a growing split among councillors, with backbenchers and cabinet members effectively becoming ‘two tribes’.
... Councillors that exercise executive decision-making powers, or those in waiting to occupy such roles, expressed persistently different views from what we might term “backbench” members, regardless of political persuasion.
‘Party groups are a means whereby any potential divisions were mediated, but the poll raises questions as to whether the party group is up to the task of restraining the institutional drivers of the modernisation agenda.

‘This study shows there is a need to find a way to better recognise the contribution of councillors who may be focused on serving their communities but feel disconnected from decision-making.’

http://www.localgov.co.uk/Modernisation-has-caused-tribal-mentality-among-councillors/37844

Why do councils need the LEP to direct them to work together?

Questions from a correspondent:

1. As I understand it the desire is that Plymouth, Torbay, Devon and Somerset County Councils and their districts will work together for the benefit of electors who (unsurprisingly) elected them in local elections.

The LEP gets funds direct from the Government and allocates them according to their perceived policies as (mostly) local unelected businessmen.

Why do these authorities NEED an LEP to co-ordinate their closer working at all? If they can’t do it by sorting it together without the LEP what hope is there for them working together at all?

2. We are told that the councils (all of them – counties cities and districts) will lose no powers.

So what will this devolved area actually be able to do that can’t be done now?

3. Are we going to be consulted?

Good questions!

Someone help me here!

Subservience to unelected and unaccountable Local Enterprise Partnership – CEO to be given delegated authority for decision- making

It really is extraordinary. With no public consultation and no meaningful debate EDDC councillors propose that wide powers over the district should be given to the unelected, unrepresentative and unaccountable body that is our “Local Enterprise Partnership”.

Not only that, they propose to delegate authority for this whole process to EDDC’s CEO Mark Williams.

On pages 44-51 of current Cabinet agenda papers:

Click to access 021215-combined-cab-agenda.pdf

is a colourful account of what powers they will be given (Owl’s inverted commas, not being exactly sure what the words mean) over health, “care” and well-being, connectivity and ” resilience”, all of which, according to the brochure will be ” business-led”.

So, forget your district, forget your communities, forget your compassion and help for the old, disabled,vulnerable and very young, forget your elected councillors – and say hello to your politically-led (page 50) yet politically unelected and so far totally unaccountable new masters.

Oh, brave new world that has such people in it.

Devon/Somerset devolution: a democratic deficit black hole

How many people realise that Devon-Somerset devolution initiative is being led, not by its councils, but by its Local Enterprise Partnership – a sort- of mega East Devon Business Forum? And that it is pressing ahead with its plans without any public consultation?

Click to access Devolution%20Statement%20of%20Intent%20(low%20res).pdf

Members of its board are listed here:
http://www.heartofswlep.co.uk/chief-executive-and-non-executive-directors

How many people realise that power over development and housing for the whole of Devon and Somerset is to be potentially given to Karim Hassan (former Regeneration supremo at EDDC and now Chief Executive of Exeter) and EDDC Leader Paul Diviani – both masterminds of Cranbrook?

Click to access Issue1HeartoftheSouthWestPadbrookPark__436306.pdf

This is what the Electoral Reform Society has to say about devolution deals in the north of England:

“The public shouldn’t just be given a yes/no option on a pre-agreed deal – we can’t have a fait accompli approach to devolution. There should be proper and meaningful consultation on the deal itself – what powers the public want the Combined Authority to have, and what they want their councils to do and look like in the 21st century.

“A piecemeal approach to engaging the public in the devolution debate isn’t sustainable. If citizens in County Durham are to be given a vote, it’s only right that citizens across the region should too.

How many people realise that the potential devolution of powers to Devon and Somerset are being led by its Local Enterprise Partnership (a collection of business people?

How many people realise that this partnership is suggesting that development and housing matters in the hands of Karim Hassan ( formerly head of Regeneration in East Devon and now Chief Executive of Exeter City Council) and EDDC council leader and Cranbrook apologist Paul Diviani?

“The Combined Authority said the public across the North East would be consulted – and we’ve yet to see what this will look like. It can’t be a tick-box exercise – instead it must be a real process of deliberative democracy, with the ability for the public to change aspects of the deal which they want to be improved. Local ‘Citizens’ Assemblies,’ like the ones we are running in Sheffield and Southampton, could be a great start.

“Let’s have a real debate about devolution and decentralisation. The ERS and leading academics are currently holding Citizens Assemblies in North and South that offer a promising model to follow in terms of engaging local people in the devolution agenda. Politicians in the region and the UK government would do well to watch them and build on them as a way to open up these discussions about where power should lie in our regions.”

http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/sites/default/files/press_release/file/Electoral%20Reform%20Society%20says%20devolution%20plans%20could%20%E2%80%98flounder%E2%80%99%20without%20real%20public%20involvement.pdf

“Audit should be citizen led” – that grey area for “Devolution plc” again

As the article points out, devolution comes with dangers:

” … There is a risk that moves towards greater decentralisation of power to newly empowered spaces – institutions of local government – simply replicate on a smaller scale the weaknesses of the national system. With the focus on new models of governance – directly elected mayors and combined authorities – crafted to suit the accountability requirements of Whitehall, it is important that new opportunities to strengthen accountability of decisions to the public space are not missed.

At core, the challenge for democratic institutions is to blur the boundaries between the governed and the government, creating more space for the former to engage with the latter while ensuring equity of participation and access. In practice at a local level there are more opportunities for this interaction – not simply due to proximity enabling direct engagement but because shared space in communities creates a focus for deliberation. There are already examples of local authorities pioneering new approaches, such as Oldham’s Co-operative Borough (as opposed to council), which involves developing the community leadership skills of elected members. The devolution of the entire health budget to Greater Manchester will be an interesting chance to consider how aligning health resource and decision-making more effectively across a place can create greater individual engagement in healthy choices and outcomes. …”

http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=17071

How spin works: Cornish devolution debate takes 20 minutes so David Cameron can announce it

Lucky they got 20 minutes – in East Devon it would more likely have been 20 seconds!

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Councillors-given-20-minutes-decide-devolution/story-27883040-detail/story.html

How many “partners” does East Devon District Council have?

East Devon, Teignbridge and Exeter have a “Greater Exeter” partnership:
http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Greater-Exeter-created-council-link/story-24643530-detail/story.html

East Devon, Plymouth, Teignbridge and Exeter have a shared IT partnership:
http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Cross-council-merger-puts-170-Devon-jobs-risk/story-18143536-detail/story.html

East Devon is one of the districts signing up to a devolutionary Somerset and Devon:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34155536

East Devon has bid for a debt recovery service with
North Devon District Council, Teignbridge District Council and Torbay Council:
http://www.sell2wales.gov.uk/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP103432

It’s getting a bit like a polygamous marriage!

Devolution: Devon and Somerset letter of intent sent today

Style over substance or the real thing? You decide:

https://new.devon.gov.uk/democracy/how-the-council-works/devolution/

So, about that EDDC new HQ ……

Unitary Devon and Somerset – hypocrisy at its finest

Recall 2009, when unitisation was last on the agenda. Here is what then EDDC Leader Sarah Randall-Johnson (thankfully ousted at the 2011 local elections) said. Recall, the exercise she led (with enthusiastic support from current Tory Councillors including Diviani and Moulding) cost this district at least £250,000 which they all agreed to take from reserves.

The Government of the day back then was New Labour.

“The idea of spending millions of pounds to create dozens of redundancies in councils across Devon makes even less sense now than it might have done in 2008.

“The unitary adventure was an unwanted distraction last year; it is even more unwanted now, as councils try to plan for the future against a background of financial stringency.”

Cllr Randall Johnson said she would be waiting to see if the “questionable” legislation would be rushed through Parliament before the General Election.

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Council-leader-puzzled-reorganisation-ruling/story-11806940-detail/story.html

Sarah Randall-Johnson, the parliamentary seat-chasing Tory leader of East Devon District Council who spent loadsa money fighting the seemingly inevitable progression of a Devon Unitary Council, has said of the latest unitary edict: “The only thing more surprising than the ridiculous single Devon unitary proposal is the period of time allowed for the public to comment – six weeks, to include the distraction of the Christmas and New Year holidays.”

http://www.theprsd.co.uk/tag/sarah-randall-page/

The leader of East Devon District Council Sara Randall Johnson said she wanted assurances that this would not prompt a “land grab” over the borders into neighbouring East Devon.

She said: “I want an assurance from the Government this will not be the precursor to a crude land grab in which the boundaries of Exeter are moved so that the city can expand into East Devon.

“We already know that East Devon has the space that a growing Exeter will need if its economy is to thrive. We are happy to be a good neighbour and to collaborate with the city on an equal basis, but we would be very protective of our borders.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Mixed-reaction-Exeter-decision/story-11817720-detail/story.html

It’s official: Devon and Somerset councils plan to merge: whither EDDC’s new HQ?

“Councillors from across Devon and Somerset have agreed on a joint devolution bid to secure greater control over skills, growth and employment in the region.

The decision follows a summit of county, unitary and district council chiefs in Exeter today, which brought local authorities one step closer to a devolution deal for the region.

Current plans propose an organisation based on the boundaries of the Heart of the South West Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP), with a focus on economic development and job creation.

Commenting on the progress, Devon County Council leader John Hart said the level of agreement had been “very encouraging”.

“It’s important that we present a united front to the Government,” he said.

“I have always said that we can do things more effectively and more efficiently locally than being told what to do by London.

“The big themes we hope to focus on are on skills, economic growth and improving productivity, as well as infrastructure so we can ensure our road and rail network is more resilient than it has been in the past.

“Doing the very best for our older residents by coordinating health and social care and affordable homes for our young people are also key themes.”

The announcement follows the confirmation of a devolution offer for Cornwall last month – the first non-urban deal of its kind.

LEP chief executive Chris Garcia was at the meeting, along with leaders from Devon’s eight district councils and Torbay mayor Gordon Oliver.

Councillors have previously indicated a bid could involve a “double devolution” model, under which the counties and unitary authorities would receive powers from central government and pass them down – where appropriate – to districts.

There has also been discussion of “soft” boundaries which would enable different parts of the region to reach individual devolution deals while still collaborating with neighbouring authorities.

The next round of devolution applications are due for submission in September.”

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Devon-Somerset-councillors-agree-joint-devolution/story-27648023-detail/story.html

Would I Lie to You? I’m a Tory politician – what do you think!

” … Mr Osborne said he was “determined the way we’re going to govern this country will change.

The way of running our country has been too centralised for too long. We want to have local people in charge of local decisions,” he said. “We’ve made a start in big cities but we’ve also made a start in some of our most rural counties.

I don’t think there’s a single model – what works in Manchester is not going to be the same for what works in Devon ,” he added. “We have to wait for local people and elected representatives to come forward with their proposals.

But I’m really open to lots of exciting ideas. Power is going to be brought much closer to the people.”

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Time-invest-West-chancellor-pledges-massive/story-27646399-detail/story.html

Yeah, yeah George – trouble is your Bullingdon Club mates don’t agree!

Devon and Somerset county merger “not ruled out” by Somerset

According to a tweet by Martyn Oates, BBC Political Correspondent today:

“.@SomersetCouncil leader @JDOsman1 on single authority for Dev & Som: Everything’s a possibility – Govt want single point of accountability.
10:15 AM – 5 Aug 2015
3 RETWEETS”

That could lead to a merged Somerset and Devon having to deal with the consortium currently consisting of Exeter, East Devon and Teignbridge!

Whither EDDC HQ then one wonders … whither ANY district council’s HQ come further amalgamation and/or devolution!

What a potential mess – from the government which originally refused to allow Devon to become a unitary authority and the district council (East Devon) that spent hundreds of thousands of pounds on refusing to merge with ANYONE back in 2007!

SWIPE – “South West Independence Party England”

Following on from our post about how much the South-West loses out to other areas of Britain, particularly the South-East, we have been considering the suggestion that we should create in this region a party similar to (but definitely not the same as) the Scottish National Party – a party representing an area which finds itself time and again the poor relation to other areas.

One should recall that the South-West has had a long tradition of non-conformity. Indeed, search on the words “south west england” and “nonconformity” and a whole host of links will turn up. Devon County Council even has web pages for it:

http://www.devon.gov.uk/index/councildemocracy/record_office/north_record_office/leaflets/sources_for_history_of_nonconformity-2.htm

Admittedly, this refers specifically to religious non-conformity. But the South-West showed its independent thinking by being a hotbed of liberalism when liberalism was something more than Nick Clegg getting into bed with the Tories. From Yeovil to Cornwall, this area steadfastly refused to be buttonholed into conformity to the pendulum swings between Labour and Conservative.

So, given that the area is now so definitely politically blue, are we getting a better deal? The post from earlier this week shows very definitely that we are not:

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2015/07/31/is-it-time-the-west-country-had-its-own-party/

So, Owl thinks it is time we started thinking about alternatives.

Firstly, what is the South-West? Officially (for political and statistical purposes) it consists of nine official regions of England: Gloucestershire, Bristol, Wiltshire, Somerset, Dorset, Devon, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly. The Owl thinks that we can discount Gloucestershire (hunting, shooting, fishing, the residences of Prince Charles and the Princes Royal and MI5 keep them firmly blue!) and Wiltshire seems just a little too close to the Home Counties and includes Swindon – definitely out. Dorset we dismiss too – they are totally conformist (see Letwin, Oliver and Grand Designs!

That leaves Bristol, Somerset, Devon, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly. Bristol has gone extremely green over recent years and are likely to remain so (hopefully) and the Isles of Scilly have always done their own thing and have never considered themselves part of mainland life, but they can have the option of joining us within Cornwall (as at present). This leaves Devon, Cornwall (including the Isles of Scilly if they so wish) and Somerset. These three counties have so much in common. Long sea coasts, poor infrastructure and transport links, large retirement communities, large number of second homes, tourism forming an important part of economic life, a history of being overlooked when the honey pot is being shared out.

Imagine a specific party for Devon, Somerset and Cornwall! Imagine what a group of people from this area who held the balance of power in Parliament could achieve. Imagine just how powerful that could be.

And the acronym: South West Independence Party England – SWIPE!

Take a SWIPE at London-centric politics – devolution for the Cornwall, Devon and Somerset region!

Alas, just a pipe dream – for now …..

Is it time the West Country had its own party!

Is the West Country being best served by either Conservative or Labour or Liberal Democrat national parties? Should we be following the SNP by attempting to look after ourselves after being overlooked and penalised in just about every major area of life?

A correspondent writes:

NHS
The decision was taken by the NHS CCG last Thursday to axe beds from both Ottery and Axminster hospitals, together with the minor injuries units at Seaton and Sidmouth.

An article in The Times in June 2015[1] reports that ‘patients in the countryside are left at a “severe disadvantage” by an NHS funding system that is skewed towards cities.’ It further states, ‘There’s diminishing availability of district nurses not because there are fewer of them but because they can do less if they travel further.’

Perhaps a report[2] by The King’s Fund, April 2013, entitled “Improving the allocation of health resources in England” can throw some light on the matter.

1. Oxford and London are “relatively over-funded compared with the rest of England”.

2. ‘In the mid-1990s, a decision was taken not to apply an updated weighting for need across all services, in particular not applying it to community health services.’

3. ‘The materially more significant political motivation is that all political parties have abided by the unwritten rule that no area should receive a real-terms cut in NHS funding as a result of resource allocation decisions. The political fallout from this would be immense and no party has had the courage to take such decisions.’

Education

Another important area where Devon receives insufficient funding relates to education. An article in the Western Morning News (WMN) of 13th March 2014, was headed ‘Westcountry schools get £23m extra next year to tackle under-funding.[3]

‘Education Minister and Somerset MP David Laws announces the money, available for 2015/16 was the “biggest step towards fairer schools funding in a decade”.’ The article later states, ‘The hand-out will act as a “bridge” until a new formula is developed to be introduced after the election in 2016, Mr Laws said.’

‘The South West in particular has been a long-standing loser. Devon sits sixth from bottom in a national league table of 150 education authorities in terms of funding.’

Rail Transport

This year, the WMN reported[4] (6th January 2015) ‘Trains serving the Westcountry are the oldest of any inter-city fleet in the country, figures have revealed against claims of massive under-investment in the region’s railways.’

‘Since the collapse of the rail line at Dawlish, critics have pointed to the chronic lack of rail investment in the South West. There has been growing criticism the response has been too feeble, with the promise of a review into an additional Dartmoor line the only clear pledge to date.’

Police

Finally, an article this week in the WMN of 20th July 2015[5] entitled ‘Scandalous divide between police funding’ states ‘Police in Devon and Cornwall receive less than half the funding per person enjoyed by forces in the capital, new figures reveal, as politicians continue their campaign for fair funding of rural services.’

‘Mr Hogg said these numbers revealed “the in-built metropolitan bias” of the current funding system.’

“The information that my office researchers have uncovered is scandalous. It is no wonder that policing is so stretched in Devon and Cornwall when Government funding is so unfair,” he said.’

Anyone else spot a trend here? The Westcountry and Devon in particular have been systematically denied adequate funding.

Now the government has announced a further round of swingeing cuts. How are they to be meted out? As our region has suffered historically from unfair funding formulas, just how does the government intend to implement these cuts in Devon?

The questions to ask are:

1) Why has our region been denied adequate funding in so many areas for so long?

2) When will Devon receive its fair share?

For example, if only the NHS in Devon had received proper funding, would the CCG have decided to axe beds or MIUs in local hospitals?

References:

1 http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/health/news/article4478425.ece
2 http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/improving-allocation-health-resources-england
3 http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Westcountry-schools-23m-year-tackle-funding/story-20805848-detail/story.html
4 http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/West-s-inter-city-trains-oldest-country/story-25812028-detail/story.html
5 http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Devon-Cornwall-Police-receive-50-funding/story-26932344-detail/story.html

Do we need a Police and Crime Commissioner when ours stands down in May?

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Devon-police-commissioner-stand/story-27453954-detail/story.html

He has more than 30 staff, a very expensive office building and appears to have achieved very little if anything (as with all Police and Crime Commissioners). Estimates of the cost of Police and Crime Commissioners so far (just over 3 years) is between £50 – £70 million.

He mentions that he won’t miss his commute from Helston to Exeter. Probably neither will we, as it is a 200 mile round trip for which we presumably pay his travel expenses.

Imagine how many police, doctors, nurses or teachers that could have funded.

Town councils becomes bigger town council to join consortium

The way of things to come? Not just districts joining together – towns joining together. Sidmouth and Budleigh? Axminster and Seaton? Cranbrook and Ottery? …

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=23758:voters-back-creation-of-largest-town-council&catid=59&Itemid=27

Devolution, Relocation – spanners in works

“Fixing the foundations: Creating a more prosperous nation”, published by the government today:

“15.3 To rebalance the economy, cities need effective governance. OECD research has shown that cities around the world with fragmented governance structures have up to 6% lower levels of productivity than those that do not.

15.4 England currently has 353 local authorities with over 18,000 elected members.5 This can lead to fragmented decision making and blurred accountability; even within the same city region, urban and suburban leaders do not always work together on shared objectives. The experience of London and other major international cities suggests that a directly elected mayor can cut through these difficulties. The government has therefore been clear that devolution of significant powers will rest on cities agreeing to rationalise governance and put in place a mayor to inspire confidence.”

Click to access Productivity_Plan_print.pdf

It’s true: localism is dead – murdered!

“Automatic planning permission would be granted on many brownfield sites in England in an attempt to boost house-building, under government plans.

Ministers would also get powers to seize disused land, while major housing projects could be fast-tracked, and rules on extensions in London relaxed.

Chancellor George Osborne said reforms were needed because Britain had been “incapable of building enough homes”.
It follows a warning this week’s Budget would cut investment in new homes.

The proposed changes feature in a 90-page document to address Britain’s productivity record, to be released later.
It is aimed at boosting British workers’ output levels, which experts say lag behind other leading nations – an issue dubbed the “productivity puzzle”.

The chancellor’s Fixing the Foundations package has been billed by the Treasury as the second half of the Budget.

Upwards extensions

BBC political correspondent Ross Hawkins said Treasury sources argue house-building boosts productivity, as it is helpful to have workers living close to their workplaces.
Housing is just one part of a broad plan, they say.

The report also features proposals on higher education, transport, devolution of powers to cities and trade.

George Osborne says reforms are needed to planning laws so more homes are built.

Under the new proposals – which will need to be approved by MPs – automatic planning permission would be granted on all “suitable” brownfield sites under a new “zonal” system, the Treasury said.

The term brownfield refers to land that has previously been developed but is vacant or derelict.

Another change would see ministers seek to scrap the need for planning permission in London for developers who want to extend buildings to the height of neighbouring properties.
Planning powers will be devolved to mayors in London and Manchester, while enhanced compulsory purchase powers will allow more brownfield land to be made available for development.

There would also be new sanctions for councils that do not deal with planning applications quickly enough, and the government would be able to intervene in councils’ local development plans.

House prices

This week, the Office for Budget Responsibility warned government plans for rent reductions in social rented homes would hit housing investment.

The OBR said 14,000 fewer affordable homes would be built and cut its forecast for investment in private housing by 0.7%.

It also said house prices were expected to rise compared with both consumer prices and household incomes.

A Treasury source said the OBR assessment considered only the impact of the Budget and did not reflect the new policy.
In his Mansion House speech in June 2014, Mr Osborne said 200,000 permissions for new homes would be made possible by 2020 as councils put in place orders to provide sites with outline planning permission.

Housing ladder

The Treasury said the new plan went further – in effect stripping away the need for any planning permission in some brownfield locations.

The Conservative manifesto pledged to “ensure that 90% of suitable brownfield sites have planning permission for housing by 2020”.

In a statement released before the publication of the productivity plan, Mr Osborne said: “Britain has been incapable of building enough homes.

“The reforms we made to the planning system in the last Parliament have started to improve the situation: planning permissions and housing starts are at a seven-year high.
“But we need to go further and I am not prepared to stand by when people who want to get on the housing ladder can’t do so.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33472405

Minister says councils should “take back power” from Whitehall

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Minister-urges-councils-power-Whitehall/story-26827606-detail/story.html

But who will take back power from power-hungry councils!

Tories of East Devon – You just don’t get it, do you?

Wednesday 3rd June

The motion to delay the Knowle Sale by 6 months was placed before Full Council by Cllr Cathy Gardner and Cllr Matt Booth.  They both presented very reasoned cases for the delay and were conciliatory in their approach.  They stressed Transparency to the residents of East Devon and in particular Sidmouth.  They did not oppose the move merely asked for more time to allow greater consultation to ensure that the Council made the right decision.

The reaction was set by Cllr Williamson who insisted that as the decision had already been validated by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee (with a set of “independent” auditors) there was no need to delay – in fact he maintained that there was a need for greater speed.  Other speakers opposing the motion spoke of the need to move and how inappropriate the current building was.

Tories – you just don’t get it!  It is recognised that the current buildings are not fit for purpose AND SOMETHING HAS TO BE DONE – but what that is and how due process is applied is the central issue in this motion.

Previous Committees and Councils sanctioned a move to Sky Park – not a mention of that! Then a sudden concept of two premises – why the change?

The appeal to the Freedom of Information request was scathing of the Council – no acceptance of that or any explanation of what was so important within the papers that they could not be released – I doubt most Tory members had even read (or been able to read) them.

Reference to election results and other “facts” but no concept of the Perception of the public – they rightly feel marginalised.

Tories – you seem to have forgotten that you serve your community – these assets are not yours – they are not even EDDC’s – they are owned by the Council Tax Payers of East Devon – you merely act as temporary custodians in the passage of time.  You MUST consult with your Community – you have failed to do this as on other occasions.  You were given the opportunity last night to make a fresh start with Openness and Transparency – you rejected that offer with your customary arrogance.

The motion was defeated by a recorded vote – this may come back to bite you!

Owl