Call for archive pictures of Pennington Point – AGAIN 13 months after the last call for them

January 2014:
https://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2013/12/11/change-of-tack-at-eddc/

And here we are – 13 months later – reinventing the same wheel. Nothing has moved on except a bit of shingle has been shifted around at a cost of £100,000.

Why bring it up again when in January 2014 there was a similar call for similar photographs after an exhibition about the beach management issue?

Well, it’s getting close to district elections and Sidmouth’s majority party (Tory) council is hoping people don’t have memories as sharp as this owl and think they are being taken care of.

More re EDDC’s attempt at Knowle ‘landgrab’

See http://saveoursidmouth.com/2015/02/13/sidmouth-town-council-adamantly-opposed-to-eddc-appropriating-extra-land-to-develop-at-knowle/

Councillor wins judicial review over £165m city centre scheme

Includes loss of civic amenities …

Cllr Gottlieb leads the Winchester Deserves Better campaign that opposes the scheme, arguing that the scheme is poorly designed and over-sized for the setting. He is also concerned that under the terms of the variation, affordable housing and civic amenities have been removed from the scheme.

http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/

Sometimes Goliath does lose.

Important paragraph omitted from Local Plan letter below

“However, because of the forthcoming local and national elections this would not appear to be a viable route to follow, as there is concern that the process could be seen as politically motivated, which would overshadow the soundness of the plan. While mindful of the need to progress quickly, the significance to the process of members’ consideration and consultation should not be overlooked, and consequently it is unlikely that we will take the report to our members until shortly after the May election.”

Quite. Perhaps, also, the news will be too much for us to bear and might affect our voting choices …..

REMINDER: ‘Knowle landgrab’ objections DEADLINE NEXT FRIDAY 20 FEB

What is widely considered the secretive saga of EDDC’s bungled relocation plans, is reaching a costly crescendo…and not just in monetary terms. If the District Council’s plans go-ahead, this unique landmark parkland will have restricted access, and the Public Open Space will be much reduced.
P1030079

To have your say, see http://saveoursidmouth.com/2015/02/12/where-how-to-send-comments-on-appropriation-disposal-of-land-at-knowle/

Following EDA

As you will have noticed, the East Devon Alliance has grabbed the headlines, and been prominently featured in the local press and radio over the past week or so.
Now this invitation has come from EDA, for any EDWatchers who might like to follow EDA news for themselves:

There are 4 options:
a. Subscribe to emails on the site – http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk
b. Subscribe to RSS on the site – http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk
c. Like EDA on Facebook – EastDevonAlliance
d. Follow on Twitter – EDevonAlliance

And if anything specially grabs EDWatchers’ attention, it can be shared with neighbours and local friends by:

a. Forwarding the email
b. Clicking the share buttons on the EDA website
c. Sharing EDA posts with friends on facebook.
d. Re-tweeting.

……There seems to be lots going on!!

Three cheers for Save Clyst St Mary campaigners!

Congratulations to Gaeron Kayley of the Save Clyst St Mary campaign, who tells us, “I have been advised that the development at the Cat and Fiddle has been refused! This shows that a collaborative, fair and open approach does give us a true voice. Lets hope events continue to go this way and our village’s character preserved.” Full story, with reasons for refusal,  here: http://saveclyststmary.org.uk/2015/02/12/cat-and-fiddle-planning-application-refused/

‘Candidates meet at HQ’: Express and Echo report on EDA news

ExpressandEchoEDA12thFeb15 001

 

“Importance of the Local Plan should not be underestimated”, says Independent Councillor

The quote from Cllr Susie Bond comes  from this post on her blog: https://susiebond.wordpress.com/2015/02/12/local-plan-update-well-sort-of/

But strangely no mention of the Local Plan (nor of the precise costs of EDDC’s planned move from Knowle ) from Cllr Bond’s colleagues representing Sidmouth, in their current leaflet to residents (mentioned on our website yesterday) . EDWatchers can view the leaflet’s two pages here: In Touch Feb 2015 and here In Touch East Devon residents’ survey. Feb 2015

Promises, promises – in 2012 it seemed so much easier!

From an earlier commentator:

It all seemed so simple back in 2012, or so they would have had us believe!

At that time, the East Devon Extra, a publication from the EDDC spin department, popped through our doors. Headlined “Facing up to the planning challenge”, EDDC then went on to tell us how wonderful and capable they were and how everything would be hunky dory with the Local Plan by 2014. Well the doubters knew better and have been shown to be correct.

May I reprint a couple of sentences from the EDDC document dated November 2012.

“Councillors have a mandate to lead and, when called upon, lead they will – to ensure that East Devon’s Local Plan meets Government requirements. On these pages is a timetable showing the work we have been doing, when it started, where we are now, and where we know we have to be within the next year or so”,

and elsewhere,

” A Planning Inspector will examine the Draft Local Plan and a final version is set to be adopted early in 2014″.

These are the same people who are behind the above report on their ‘ongoing commitment’, and the same ones who know best about the vanity new HQ project.

Leadership is not a quality that has been demonstrated in this matter. Incompetence, now thats a much clearer element.

See http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/facing-up-to-the-planning-challenge.pdf

if it stays in the EDDC website long enough!

An election coming up? Local Plan update …! But more secrecy!

But report stays confidential! Puff job? And no mention of 5 year land supply …

Here’s EDDC’s update on the situation:
As part of East Devon District Council’s ongoing commitment to finalise its Local Plan with the East Devon Local Plan Inspector, the council’s service lead for Planning Strategy and Development Management, has written to the Inspector to update him on progress made with the East Devon Local Plan Examination.

The letter confirms that East Devon District Council is expecting to receive – on or before Friday 13 February 2015 – a draft report of the Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA is a multi-authority commission by East Devon, Exeter, Mid Devon and Teignbridge Councils and Dartmoor National Park Authority, with Devon County Council also being a partner), which we commissioned, together with a number of other studies, in order to establish a robust understanding of the objectively assessed housing need in East Devon. At this stage, the SHMA report, which is being produced by our appointed consultants DCA, remains highly confidential as it is still a work in progress, with findings yet to be made conclusive.

While the SHMA report was being produced, it became clear that housing needs, potentially arising as a result of possible future job growth, warranted particular attention. As a result, the multi-authority partnership (comprising the five Devon local councils, as well as Dartmoor National Park Authority, as listed above) commissioned Edge Analytics to undertake specific modelling work to establish the relationship between job growth and housing requirements. In addition, East Devon District Council has also commissioned work by Ash Futures Ltd to specifically advise on future job growth levels in East Devon. We have received draft reports from both Ash Futures and Edge Analytics and we will be pushing for final speedy conclusion of all reports.

East Devon District Council’s Leader, Councillor Paul Diviani said: “We welcome the imminent arrival of the SHMA draft report, this week. These three reports are an integral part of the East Devon Local Plan. Their undertaking – involving a significant number of other local authorities – has been an enormously complex process, which has taken longer than would have been desirable.

“The benefits of undertaking these reports should not be underestimated. It clearly demonstrates that best practice is at the heart of our decision making and confirmed the need for an altogether more substantial and complex end piece of work and has fully justified the need for additional consultancy support.

“We are very much aware of the need to finalise our Local Plan, but at the same time we have to take the reports with proposed changes to the Plan to our members for consideration and consultation. We had envisaged that the earliest we would have been able to take the reports to our members would be March or early April 2015. The process of consultation would then take around six-weeks. ”

With power come responsibilities …

University graduates are to be made to take basic maths and English exams (again) before being allowed on teaching courses.

Shouldn’t we expect the same of councillors and should we also have obligatory courses on public finance, audit and governance before they are let loose on lots of our money and lots of their power?

And should officers have to have obligatory refresher courses rather than voluntary or no extra training because things change so quickly?

Psephology – the study of elections – is getting complicated!

MPs constituencies can be a very puzzling thing and can lead to strange results in elections, and especially the forthcoming district and Parliamentary elections which appear to be the most volatile for decades.

For example:

The East Devon constituency (current MP Hugo Swire) includes a chunk of inner Exeter (St Loyes) which comes under Exeter City Council and where your neighbours directly across the street have Ben Bradshaw (Labour) as their MP.

If you live somewhere like Stoke Cannon then your district council is East Devon but your MP is Mid-Devon’s Mel Stride.

If you live in the Tiverton and Honiton constituency, your MP (Neil Parish, farmer) has a totally rural community except for the coastal town of Seaton (with Axmouth and Beer) which has quite different problems to the rest of the constituency.

Uplyme, in the Tiverton and Honiton constituency and under East Devon District Council is geographically and psychologically closer to Lyme Regis (West Dorset)

Could be very interesting!

Midweek Herald on ‘breath of fresh air’, and the delayed Local Plan

Two thorough articles in today’s Midweek Herald, on some burning East Devon issues, in case readers missed them in our earlier posts:

MidweekEDA10thFeb

MidweekLocalPlanFeb10th2015

 

Our external auditor produces report noting half of councillors and officers say scrutiny is not challenging enough

When respondents were asked who was responsible for driving good governance at their organisation, the most common responses were the chief executive and the finance director (both 25%).

The head of legal/monitoring officer was named by 19% of respondents (up from 14% in 2012/13).

Other key findings from the report included:

46% of respondents said they considered backbench members had no real influence over decisions;

84% said their organisations were now using or considering alternative delivery models;

59% said the transition to police and crime commissioners had not had a positive impact on local partnership working arrangements;

42% saw no difference in local healthcare governance as a result of councils’ new public health role;

The annual accounts and annual governance statement continued to expand in length, “making them even more challenging for people to read and understand, impacting on local transparency and accountability”;

Only 30% of cabinet positions in local authorities were held by women, while over half the survey said members did not adequately reflect the demographic profile of the local population;

Most survey respondents named external audit as their main source of assurance on the governance framework, rather than internal audit. “This raises concerns that some internal audit functions are not sufficiently strategic and are not providing the broader assurance required in a complex and challenging environment.”

Paul Dossett, Partner and Head of Local Government at Grant Thornton UK LLP, said: “Though 15 years have passed since the introduction of scrutiny committees it’s clear that the system has been a mixed success. Nearly one in five of the councils surveyed said that they had returned, or were considering returning, to the traditional committee structure. This could turn out to be a backwards step for effective scrutiny.

“Scrutiny committees can offer a valuable ‘check’ to the executive. Potentially, they can also offer a fresh perspective by taking both a long-term view of strategic issues and ‘deep dives’ into vital areas of council operations. We know that some councils are doing this with great success so it’s important that those who are struggling receive support to improve their processes so that they are not tempted to fall back in to outdated methods of scrutiny.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=21701:half-of-officers-and-members-see-scrutiny-as-not-challenging-enough-report&catid=59&Itemid=27

The Grant Thornton report is here:

Click to access Local-government-governance-review-2015-All-aboard.pdf

Does Hugo Swire talk to local Tory councillors? It seems not

Our (current) MP Hugo Swire has just said all is well with superfast broadband in East Devon:

http://www.hugoswire.org.uk/news/new-figures-show-more-homes-and-businesses-getting-superfast-broadband-east-devon

Our (current) Tory councillor whose responsibilities include broadband says it isn’t:

http://www.trinitymatters.co.uk/index.php/component/k2/item/142-reasons-why-your-rural-broadband-will-not-be-superfast

Er, someone off message here boys!

Our Local Plan is just too complex for our councillors and officers to even think of a completion date

It is absolutely shocking. If we had consulted only with Exeter and West Dorset (as was required under the duty to co-operate in the National Planning Policy Statement) instead of broadening it to Teignbridge and Dartmoor National Park (which was not required), that would have helped – we are now waiting for them all to tell us just how many houses THEY think should be built in East Devon. But even more help would have been to divert the £700,000 plus already spent on the relocation vanity project (spent mostly on expensive consultants and this figure not including officer time which must have run into thousands of hours that could have been spent on the Local Plan) into getting enough man/woman power to get this sorted.

Other local authorities seem to be able to do their Local Plans, get them examined and get them passed. What is it about East Devon that seems to make this impossible? Roll on the Independents who don’t have to worry about party loyalties when making important decisions for the district!

MidweekLocalPlanFeb10th2015

Honiton Beehive problems started long ago

A local resident has reminded us that, when talking about funding of Honiton Beehive Community Centre, problems bagan long ago and EDDC stumped up £130,000 of ALL taxpayer’s money without apoearing to find out where the blame for the priblem originated (and it wasn’t Honiton Town Council):

An extract from the Audit & Governance Committee agenda of 14th November 2013 summarizes progress on The Beehive community centre at Honiton[2]. The advice was that, “surface water drainage provision would be needed to a higher standard than originally anticipated to reflect potential flooding issues, especially to neighbouring residential properties.”

“HTC had not envisaged such costs in its original budgeting. EDDC officers from Property, Planning and Building Control met with HTC to assess the issue and determine a workable resolution. The various drainage scenarios and history of the issue were considered. The outcome was that, for the project build to proceed to a point where it could be signed off, a drainage infrastructure investment would be needed over and above the capacity of the existing fund. Therefore to cover the necessary works EDDC agreed by urgent verbal report to 12 June 2013 Cabinet (Part B) to fund a sum of up to 90% of a ceiling of £130,000. HTC will be expected to meet 10% of costs.”

“The reason for this urgency was that works would have to stop on the site construction and additional costs would be incurred by delay to contract. Without agreement to the provision of suitable drainage the building would not be signed off by Building Control and the planning condition not discharged. The building would therefore be uninsurable.”

This work was necessary despite the fact that the “system has been designed for the 1 in 100 year storm event with an appropriate allowance for climate change of 30%.”

The resident adds:

So in this case it seems developers or engineers or Some other outside agency miscalculated the work required, yet they all still walked away with most of the profit, leaving the Local Authority to pick up the major part of the bill for flood prevention

Don’t do as EDDC does, do what it says!

Local residents have been attempting to force EDDC to have an independent audit of its relocation plans without success.

NOW we find that EDDC is prepared to pay for an independent audit of the finances of the Beehive Community Centre (which was massively subsidised by EDDC and its Honiton-centric senior councillors).

The project has already cost £2 million – and it is MUCH smaller than the offices EDDC would like to build in Honiton.

Oh, and the Thelma Hulbert Gallery continues to be greatly subsidised by all East Devon’s taxpayers too!

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Honiton-councillors-debate-East-Devon-s-offer/story-25997502-detail/story.html