Category Archives: Misc

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

29 Jan 2018

Posted under

Affordable and Social Housing, Brownfield sites, Developers/ Development, EDDC, Misc, Planning System

Comments

2 Comments

Greenfield to concrete

England is losing an area the size of Glasgow every year because of a record number of developments on greenfield land.

Forests, fields and parks are disappearing under concrete at the fastest rate for a quarter of a century, an investigation by The Times has found.

“On average, 170 sq km of greenfield land were built on every year from 2013 to 2016 after the government relaxed planning rules to ease the housing shortage.

The rate of development is more than two-and-a-half times the 25-year average and five times higher than the rate between 2006 and 2011.

If the construction of new homes, shops and infrastructure continues at the present pace, an area the size of Greater London will have been built on by 2028.

Greenfield land — not to be confused with green belt — refers to “previously undeveloped land” that includes farmland, gardens, forests and “grassed areas” in towns and cities.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England said that the government figures were “startling”. Graeme Willis, head of rural campaigns, said: “To use land more sustainably, we must start using it more efficiently. This rate of loss cannot be endured without losing huge swathes of our countryside. It is a non-renewable resource. Once built on, [it] is lost forever.”

The government changed the planning laws in 2012 to increase the rate of building with “a presumption in favour of sustainable development”, which required local authorities to allocate land for development.

“What you saw after 2012 was local authorities getting their houses in order in terms of land supply,” Duncan Hartley, director of planning at Rural Solutions, a property consultancy, said. “They have been allocating sites for development and those sites have had to be substantial to meet housing needs.” The single biggest use for greenfield sites once developed was housing at 17 per cent. The other significant uses were for industrial sites, transport infrastructure, offices and shops.

A spokesman for the Ministry of Housing said: “We will be working to put the environment at the heart of planning, making sure any new development improves the environment locally and nationally, while contributing to the wider commitment to build 300,000 homes a year.”

From 1989 to 2011, most developments were on brownfield sites.

From 2013-16, the pendulum swung the other way, with greenfield sites supplying 54 per cent of the land.”

Source The Times, paywall

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

28 Jan 2018

Posted under

Accountability, Affordable and Social Housing, Developers/ Development, Inequality, Misc

“Hundreds of thousands living in squalid rented homes in England”

Owl says: the sixth RICHEST country in the world …. where landlord MPs refused to pass a law about habitable housing because … well just because they can.

“Rented housing so squalid it is likely to leave tenants requiring medical attention is being endured by hundreds of thousands of young adults in England, an analysis of government figures has revealed.

Rats, mouldy walls, exposed electrical wiring, leaking roofs and broken locks are among problems blighting an estimated 338,000 homes rented by people under 35 that have been deemed so hazardous they are likely to cause harm.

It is likely to mean that over half a million people are starting their adult lives in such conditions amid a worsening housing shortage and rising rents across the UK which are up 15% in the last seven years.

Visits by the Guardian to properties where tenants are paying private landlords up to £1,100 a month have revealed holes in external walls, insect-infested beds, water pouring through ceilings and mould-covered kitchens.

A 30-year-old mother near Bristol said her home is so damp that her child’s cot rotted. A 34-year-old woman in Luton told of living with no heating and infestations of rats and cockroaches, while a 24-year-old mother from Kent said she lived in a damp flat with no heating and defective wiring for a year before it was condemned. …

Government figures suggest as many as 2.4 million people in England live in rented homes – both in the private and social sectors – with category 1 hazards. That includes 756,000 households living in private rented properties – almost one in five of the whole private rented stock – and 244,000 households in social housing.

Sajid Javid, the housing secretary, said he was determined “to do everything possible to protect tenants” and pledged government support for new legislation that requires all landlords to ensure properties are safe and give tenants the right to take legal action if landlords fail in their duties..

“In practice you have fewer rights renting a family home than you do buying a fridge-freezer,” said John Healey MP, Labour’s shadow secretary of state for housing. “Too many people are forced to put up with downright dangerous housing. After the terrible fire at Grenfell Tower, it’s even more important that ministers back Labour’s plan to make all homes fit for human habitation.” …

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jan/28/hundreds-of-thousands-living-in-squalid-rented-homes-in-england?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

28 Jan 2018

Posted under

Accountability, Conflict of interest, Lobbying, Misc, Scrutiny, Sleaze, Standards Committee, Transparency

Comments

3 Comments

Tory ex-Ministers hawk their influence for cash

Owl says: Does this disgraceful behaviour go top down, bottom up – or both? Owlis of the opinion it is the latter!

“Former cabinet ministers have been exposed attempting to profit from a new cash for Brexit gravy train in Westminster, following an undercover investigation.

Lord Lansley, the former health secretary, was secretly filmed offering to use his knowledge and connections from within West­minster to provide “intelligence” on Brexit to a Chinese company offering him tens of thousands of pounds.

The peer, who has previously been accused of “ripping the heart” out of a bill to regulate lobby­ing, showed he was willing to pick up information from a key Brexit cabinet minister. He advised how the deal could be kept secret from the authorities by employing him through his wife’s company.

Peter Lilley, the former deputy Conservative Party leader, was also willing to approach key ministers on the Chinese company’s behalf. As part of his pitch for the job he described how he attended two advisory groups with influence over the Brexit minis­ters, one of which has never previously been revealed.

A third former minister, Andrew Mitchell MP, also appeared happy to give paid Brexit advice to the Chinese company. He charges £6,000 a day and disclosed that he was looking to work up to 10 weeks a year for private clients despite being paid £74,962 as an MP. “My constituents don’t mind what I’m paid,” he said.

The three men were secretly filmed as part of a joint undercover investigation by The Sunday Times and Channel 4’s Dispatches into politicians improperly making money from Britain’s negotiations to leave the European Union. …”

[there follows several pages of sleazy revelations]

Source: Sunday Times (pay wall)

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

28 Jan 2018

Posted under

Accountability, Austerity cuts, Education (local), Misc, Scrutiny, Transparency

Who holds academies (and every other privatised service) to account?

” An Observer piece questions the growth of academy schools, warning that: “There is no evidence that, on average, academy chains do any better at managing schools than the local authorities they replaced. Instead, the reforms have created a structural mess, opening up profound gaps in accountability and governance.” The paper also reports that six out of 10 of the biggest academy trusts have raised “warnings over pressures on pay, staffing levels, building maintenance and mounting deficits”, which “raises the spectre of what would happen if a major academy chain were to go bust”.

The Observer, Page: 46

 

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

28 Jan 2018

Posted under

Accountability, Education (local), Misc, Privatisation

Comments

1 Comment

Academy schools – the next privatisation domino to fall?

“More than half of the major operators of the government’s flagship academies programme have sounded the alarm over school funding, heaping further pressure on Theresa May to ease the squeeze on public spending.

An Observer investigation into the Conservatives’ treasured education initiative found that six out of the top 10 academy trusts, which operate hundreds of schools across England, have raised warnings over pressures on pay, staffing levels, building maintenance and mounting deficits.

The revelation will worry Tory MPs, many of whom blame pressures on school budgets for the party’s disastrous election result last year. It comes with the prime minister already under intense pressure over NHS funding and facing internal criticism over a lack of focus on domestic issues.

An analysis of the most recent accounts of leading multi-academy trusts reveals that eight of the top 13 largest groups have issued warnings. One said that funding was failing to keep pace with costs and inflation, creating risks of “unsustainable deficits” and staff cuts. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/jan/27/schools-academy-trusts-warn-pay-staffing-public-spending?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

27 Jan 2018

Posted under

Accountability, Austerity cuts, Misc, Privatisation, Transparency

Comments

1 Comment

PFI – a licence to print money?

“Carillion made £500m in revenue from selling off Private Finance Initiative (PFI) projects between 2003 and 2011, with many deals handing the construction firm returns of more than 15 per cent per year.

The most lucrative sale was of three NHS hospital buildings in Staffordshire, Swindon and Glasgow in 2007 which netted Carillion a 38.7 per cent annual return, according to analysis by the European Services Strategy Unit (ESSU). Around £200m of the sales came after 2010, the figures show.

Several of the purchasers are based offshore meaning they pay no UK corporation tax on the profits they derive from the schemes, which are ultimately paid for by taxpayers, the ESSU research found. …

… There are currently 735 operational PFI and PF2 deals, with a capital value of around £60bn. Annual charges for these deals amounted to £10.3bn in 2016-17, the NAO found. Even if no new deals are entered into, future charges which continue until the 2040s will amount to £199bn.

Earlier research by the ESSU found that nine offshore funds own between 50 per cent and 100 per cent of the equity in 335 PFI projects across the UK. The funds own 45 per cent of all current projects, ESSU said. …”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/carillion-made-500m-in-revenue-from-pfi-projects-with-annual-returns-of-up-to-39-research-finds-a8180986.html

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

27 Jan 2018

Posted under

Misc

Claire Wright: “Care at home isn’t working, Sidmouth GP tells Devon County Council’s Health Scrutiny Committee”

From the blog of Claire Wright:

“Carers aren’t available to look after people in their homes, a Sidmouth GP told Devon County Council’s Health and Adult Care Scrutiny Committee on Thursday (25 January).

So concerned at the unavailability of care in people’s homes – the service designed to replace community hospital beds, Dr Mike Slot travelled to County Hall to share his concerns with the health scrutiny committee.

After he had finished his submission I tried to ask a question, but was prevented from doing so by the chair and scrutiny clerk, who informed me that it was against the rules for councillors to ask questions of public speakers!  This was the first I knew of it since my proposal to bring in public speaking to scrutiny was agreed two years ago.

The Head of Social Care and the committee chair both intimated that Dr Slot’s view may be an isolated one…. I am less convinced.

At the end of the meeting in the work programme I successfully proposed a spotlight review to investigate Dr Slot’s concerns fully.

Another member of the public was told she was not able to speak to the committee because she missed the deadline, despite there being slots available.

I have since contacted the officer presiding over the Procedures Committee (which I am a member of) to get the rules reviewed. They will now be debated at the the April committee.

I asked Dr Slot for a copy of his speech, which is below.

“If community hospital beds was intended to be offset by increasing the capacity of community care so that patients could be cared for in their own homes. This may or may not have been realistic since many of the patients in the hospital system cannot be managed in the community even with excellent community services.

However, with or without community hospital beds it is an excellent idea to expand community services so that all those patients who can be cared for out of hospital can remain at home. Unfortunately there is not sufficient capacity in the home care services to do this job.

When GPs ring the single point of access number asking for rapid response or night sitting, the carers are not available. This is partly due to lack of resources and partly due to difficulty with recruitment. I suspect that part of the difficulty with recruitment may be due to the terms and conditions. If the carers only get paid if they are required then this may not be particularly attractive.

We understand that a hospital only functions well with a maximum of 85% bed occupancy, and similarly with the home care service we need to accept that there will be some unused capacity otherwise the service is never able to accept unexpected cases. Thus we need to allocate enough resource so that we can offer both an attractive rate of pay and attractive terms and conditions.

This is in fact an essential part of the answer to the problem the entire NHS is experiencing. If the level of water in a reservoir is steadily rising and then overflows, you can either try and build the banks higher in which case it will just overflow a bit later, or you can look at the streams going in and going out of it.

Similarly when you see an overflowing A&E or hospital you can buy more A&E or acute beds (very expensive) or you can increase community capacity to prevent people going in and facilitate people coming out (relatively much cheaper but you still have to pay a proper rate for it).”

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/care_at_home_isnt_working_sidmouth_gp_tells_devon_county_councils_health_sc

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

27 Jan 2018

Posted under

Accountability, AONB, Blackhill Quarry, Clinton Devon Estates, Developers/ Development, Misc, Woodbury

“50 disused quarries turned into wildlife habitats to help Britain’s endangered birds”

Owl says: Alas not Clinton Devon Estates Blackhill Quarry, promised for environmental restoration, now subject of a heavily industrial planning application:

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2018/01/26/woodbury-business-park-expansion-would-be-morally-and-ecologically-wrong/

… “A conservation project to turn 50 quarries into nature reserves by 2020 has been completed two years early and is already saving endangered species, like the turtle dove.

In 2010, the RSPB joined forces with building materials supplier CEMEX to rejuvenate dozens of disused quarries.

And within fewer than eight years, 1,000 hectares of grassland, woodland, heath and wetland has been created which is helping rare and unusual species to flourish including 50 ‘at risk’ species.

Threatened birds which have moved into the conservation areas include turtle doves, choughs and twites, all of which have seen huge falls in numbers in the past decades. …

… Andy Spencer, Director of Sustainability, CEMEX UK said: “While supplying our customers with concrete, cement, sand and stone we also aim to balance the needs of operations with the protection and enhancement of the natural world. The RSPB has been pivotal in helping us to achieve this aim.

“The 1000th hectare that has just been created is a significant and outstanding milestone and our partnership to date has helped create some amazing places for communities and nature.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2018/01/27/50-disused-quarries-turned-wildlife-habitats-help-britains-endangered/

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

27 Jan 2018

Posted under

Affordable and Social Housing, Developers/ Development, Misc

“Building more homes in London won’t solve the country’s housing crisis”

Owl says: most homes in the Devon and Somerset Local Enterprise Partnership area are being built near Hinkley C nuclear power station to house up to 5,000 largely temporary workers.

“… England’s fragile economic growth is underpinned by household expenditure, which accounts for 63% of gross domestic product. This is dependent upon perceived wealth, which is directly correlated with the price of housing. House price growth has left homeowners (particularly in London) feeling richer while renters feel poorer. To undermine that perception of affluence among homeowners would have a significant economic impact.

So there is huge demand for new housing, but little incentive for policymakers to deliver this where greatest demand exists. We need an answer that is politically expedient, economically pragmatic and socially responsible.

The government needs to avoid house price depreciation but stabilise prices in London, where there is highest demand. Affordability is a spatial problem that demands a spatial solution. It must focus attention on areas where the ability to purchase and the cost of doing so are more closely aligned. The mayor’s plan for London could then focus policies on providing genuinely affordable homes for Londoners.

The Midlands engine and northern powerhouse are attracting and retaining investor attention, and elected mayors in Bristol, Birmingham and Manchester, among others, are beginning to flex their muscles. Yet this is as much a reaction to the London market as any proactive national policies. Clearer government leadership would expedite change and provide greater long-term certainty.

Investment and infrastructure decisions are being made but are too often buried within various national plans ‘and strategies. They should be bought to the forefront. Every other country in western Europe has a national spatial plan; England should publish one too. This would make clear how spending and policy decisions are related, supporting regional revival.

The housing paradox is stifling. To solve it, we must take a pragmatic approach that supports England’s regions. That would not be at the expense of London, but we could all be better served by casting a wider net.”

https://www.theguardian.com/housing-network/2017/nov/17/building-homes-london-wont-solve-housing-crisis?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

26 Jan 2018

Posted under

Accountability, Misc, Privatisation, Scrutiny, Transparency

“Tories refuse to publish official report on doomed Carillion’s performance because it’s ‘commercially sensitive’ “

“The Ministry of Justice has confirmed it commissioned an independent review into prison maintenance, millions of pounds of which was outsourced to the stricken giant, early last year.

The review was carried out after prisons minister Sam Gyimah said he was “not impressed” by Carillion’s maintenance work and the firm was sent a formal warning in September 2016. Despite the row, the firm went on to win another £40million in Ministry of Justice contracts last year – before collapsing leaving 20,000 jobs in the balance. Yet ministers say the report – together with other reports on Carillion’s effectiveness including an “improvement plan” – will not be handed to the independent House of Commons Library.

Justice minister Rory Stewart wrote: “There are no plans to place the information in the library as the report contains commercially sensitive information.”

Shadow Justice Secretary Richard Burgon said: “It’s outrageous that the govenrment is now refusing to publish this or any other reports that the Ministry of Justice has done into Carillion’s performance in our prisons.

“What has it got to hide?

“All too often with deals signed with private companies in our justice system, there is a lack of transparency and openness.

“This makes it incredibly difficult to hold the private sector to account and to ensure that companies are working in the public interest and not their own.”

A string of parliamentary questions by Mr Burgon revealed the Ministry of Justice spent £11.4million over three years on its 97-strong team of officials whose job it was to monitor contracts. But ministers admitted an “underestimation of the historical costs” meant some contracts did not achieve the savings they promised.

Mr Stewart said the independent report in early 2017 was “used to support several improvement initiatives.”

He added the department had meetings with Carillion at various levels “at least weekly” to discuss “specific issues”. He was unable to name the total number of meetings.

The minister told Mr Burgon: “A formal letter of concern was issued in 2016 to advise Carillion of performance failures.

“A performance action plan was put in place to address these failings and some improvements were made.”

It came as the government tonight said it has saved 1,000 Carillion prisons jobs by setting up its own facilities management firm. The staff in 52 jails who previously employed by the giant will move to the new company, Gov Facility Services Limited, with their terms and conditions preserved. Their work includes cleaning, maintenance and building repair.

Justice Secretary David Gauke said: “I want to reassure staff that their jobs are secure and essential to making prisons safer and more decent.”

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tories-refuse-publish-official-report-11920351

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

26 Jan 2018

Posted under

Affordable and Social Housing, Economy, Misc, Post-Brexit Adjustments

Comments

1 Comment

London: luxury apartments failing to sell

“More than half of the 1,900 ultra-luxury apartments built in London last year failed to sell, raising fears that the capital will be left with dozens of “posh ghost towers”.

The swanky flats, complete with private gyms, swimming pools and cinema rooms, are lying empty as hundreds of thousands of would-be first-time buyers struggle to find an affordable home.

The total number of unsold luxury new-build homes, which are rarely advertised at less than £1m, has now hit a record high of 3,000 units, as the rich overseas investors they were built for turn their backs on the UK due to Brexit uncertainty and the hike in stamp duty on second homes. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/jan/26/ghost-towers-half-of-new-build-luxury-london-flats-fail-to-sell?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

26 Jan 2018

Posted under

Misc

From the blog of East Devon Alliance Councillor Martin Shaw:

“In my third and final report from yesterday’s Health Scrutiny, I come to the report on the future of the hospitals by NEW Devon CCG and NHS Property Services, in response to the Committee’s request for clarification. (This arose from my presentations at the September and November meetings). While NHS PS stressed that in principle they will eventually have to charge market rents, Claire Wright elicited the useful information that currently NHS England are still paying for the buildings, and the company said they are ‘always happy to work with local communities to consider local services’. Scrutiny’s resolution requested that NHS PS ‘uphold this undertaking’ and keeps the Committee informed on the timeline for changes in the status of the hospitals.

The CCG’s Sonja Manton confirmed that the community conversations the CCG and RD&E are now promoting to develop ‘place-based systems‘ around ‘market towns’ – which have already begun in Honiton and Okehampton – can certainly include the services people want to have delivered locally in the hospitals. While there are cost constraints and not everything which people want will necessarily be delivered, local communities can certainly discuss these services with the NHS organisations, as well as how voluntary organisations can help the NHS and adult social care. Okehampton’s Conservative county councillor, Kevin Ball (below front left, with Non-Aligned Group leader Frank Biederman behind), stressed the progress his community had made in the recent meeting in the town. He and Okehampton’s mayor, Jan Goffey, mentioned that FORCE Chemotherapy will soon be opening a service in the hospital.

In my speech (1:34:20) I welcomed the new ‘place-based’ focus and stressed the importance for towns like Seaton – which is 45 minutes to an hour from acute hospitals – of using the free space in the community hospital to deliver routine treatments and operations for which people currently have to go to Exeter. I pointed out that constituents complain to me all the time about the stress, strain and cost of repeated travelling, often when unwell, without parking, park-and-ride space or bus services – while Exeter complains of congestion!

I mentioned the request of the RD&E’s Em Wilkinson-Bryce, in Honiton last week, for the community to trust the NHS organisations, and said that a serious conversation about local services – in which the NHS takes on board what people want – would be the best way to create this. We wanted to keep the beds, but know they are gone proper ‘place-based’ strategies for each of our towns offer the prospect of working together with the NHS. Preparations are underway for a meeting similar to ‘Honiton’s Health Matters’ in Seaton in March, and I will give more information as soon as the date is fixed.

https://seatonmatters.org/2018/01/26/health-scrutiny-hears-there-will-be-no-precipitate-decisions-on-community-hospitals-local-conversations-with-ccg-and-rde-offer-chance-to-shape-place-based-health-systems-around-towns/

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

26 Jan 2018

Posted under

Misc

Cranbrook: estate rent charges to be transferred to council tax

“Estate Rent Charge Agreement to proceed

In August last year the Town Council (CTC) decided that it would proceed with negotiating with the Consortium to replace the estate rent charge by including this cost in the council tax. At an extraordinary meeting in January, the Town Council approved the Agreement. This Agreement, when signed by all the parties involved, removes the estate rent charge from 1 April 2018 and transfers ownership and responsibility to the Town Council for the first phase of public open space, including parts of the Country Park and St Martin’s and Hayes Square play parks. Under the Agreement, further areas of open space will transfer to the Town Council as they are finished in years to come.

Following approval of the Agreement, the Town Council finalised the budget which would be needed up to the end of March 2019 and agreed a precept (the Cranbrook Town Council element of the council tax) of £388,398. The precept will be collected by East Devon District Council through the council tax from April onwards.

By moving to council tax, households will be able to pay monthly and benefit from any discounts available under the council tax scheme.

How much council tax will I pay?

The amount of council tax paid by each household depends on the band which applies to the property eg. band A – H. The band is shown on the council tax bill.

Around 97% of homes in Cranbrook are in bands A – E and these households will be paying less under the new arrangements next year than they would have paid with the previous council tax and estate rent charge combined this year, and this does not take into account how the estate rent charge may have increased next year had it remained. …

The Town Council will also be holding surgeries for residents to discuss the change with Councillors on an individual basis. Residents are invited to call in to any of the surgeries which will be held in the Younghayes Centre on:

Monday 29 January (6.30pm – 8.30pm) Saturday 3 February (10.00am to noon) Monday 12 February (6.30pm – 8.30pm) Saturday 17 February (10.00am to noon)”

Click to access 180125-ERC-Press-Release.pdf

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

21 Jan 2018

Posted under

Misc

“NHS funding boost only propping up services”

A report from the NAO has found that Government funding designed to “transform” the NHS has only managed to prop up struggling services, and may have worsened health service finances in the long run.

The watchdog criticised the Government for relying on short-term cash injections, which have been immediately allocated to meet soaring demand and pre-existing deficits.

An extra £1.8bn in sustainability and transformation funding in 2016-17 was supposed to allow for reforms to be implemented across the health service.

PAC chair Meg Hillier said the findings shows why the NHS needs a longer-term funding plan.

The Independent

Image

Posted by

Posted on

19 Jan 2018

Posted under

Misc

Comments

2 Comments

East Devon Alliance Councillor says “pay to pee” is “a backward step for civilisation”

Notice the contradiction here: one councillor says the idea is not being looked at, another group of councillors say town and parish councils have been asked to look at “other uses” for toilets!  Left hand and right hand perhaps need an introduction.

And a £100,000 subsidy for Honiton’s Thelma Hulbert Gallery!  Owl will be digging its talons into that one!

 

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

17 Jan 2018

Posted under

Misc

John Prescott calls grandiose transport plans “fraud”

Owl says: perhaps John Prescott should read our Local Enterprise Partnership’s grandiose plans for our area and see if he thinks this description applies to some or all of them!

BIG plans do not equal big actions when there is no big money coming to anything other than Brexit, vanity projects and now shoring up privatised companies with government contracts.

LEP – Local Excessive Plans!

“A wide-ranging plan to upgrade transport across northern England was branded a “bloody fraud” by Lord Prescott yesterday amid claims that it is not backed by government funding.

The former deputy prime minister stormed out of a launch event in Hull in protest as Transport for the North (TfN), a “sub-national transport body” set up by the Tories in 2015 to co-ordinate transport across northern England, unveiled a £70 billion blueprint to transform road and rail links over the next 30 years. TfN has the power to produce a transport strategy, which the government must consider when making decisions, but it has no budget.

The report proposes cutting journey times between Manchester and Leeds from 49 to 30 minutes by building a new transpennine rail line. It also suggests another line between Liverpool and the HS2 link into Manchester, which is due to be built by 2033, and upgrades to existing tracks connecting Sheffield, York, Hull and Newcastle.

Lord Prescott told the BBC: “It can talk to the Treasury along with the strategic bodies but it can’t make a decision. It doesn’t get any money.”

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/john-prescott-calls-transport-strategy-a-bloody-fraud-7rmqg2g0d

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

16 Jan 2018

Posted under

Misc

Comments

3 Comments

EDDC pre-empts its Exmouth seafront planning application with award of contract

The following press release says that EDDC HAS AWARDED a contract for a play area but later says it is “subject to [its own as yet undetermined] planning application!

PRESS RELEASE

“Coming soon to Exmouth’s Queen’s Drive – a new, free, Jurassic-themed, play space for children, teenagers and families

Council awards contract to playground equipment specialists

East Devon District Council is moving ahead with delivering new attractions and entertainment on Exmouth’s sea front, while longer term development plans take shape.

The council, who is the landowner, has awarded a contract for a new and free play space at Queen’s Drive with attractive and fun play equipment for children, teenagers and families. The council is investing £150,000 in the project and the free play space will sit alongside a range of other temporary uses, including food, drink and events to provide a lively and up to date attraction on the sea front.

Tenders were sought from play providers across the country to offer something very new for the town and six exciting and imaginative designs were submitted. The council has chosen award-winning playground equipment specialists, Eibe, who have come up with a great mix of activities for different ages and abilities, based on a Jurassic theme. There will be swings, slides, roundabouts and see-saws along with sand pits to dig for fossils, as well as pterodactyls (flying reptile) nests to climb in and around.

The centrepiece of the playpark, subject to planning consent, is expected to be a 7.5m high ‘Old Wise Tree’, a tower feature with climbing and balancing activities, as well as a 7m tubular slide. This, along with another tall piece of equipment proposed for the site, will need approval from the council’s development management committee. Permission is being sought as part of the council’s current temporary uses planning application for Queen’s Drive which is expected to go before the committee in March.

Work to install the play equipment will start after the permissions have been approved and the free play area is expected to be completed by late Spring.

Cllr Philip Skinner, the council’s portfolio holder for the economy and chairman of the Exmouth Regeneration Programme Board, said: “The free play space signals exciting changes underway for Exmouth seafront and we are looking forward to a positive planning decision on our application that will let the full installation begin.

“We want the Queen’s Drive site to be active and attractive for this holiday season and beyond. When we move toward permanent development and attractions on the site then equipment can be relocated and reused on other East Devon play sites, so that other children can continue to enjoy this brilliant new equipment into the future.”

The council is continuing work on proposals for temporary uses for other parts of the site and is awaiting the outcome of its procurement process to select a food operator for the site. In addition, the council is finalising the appointment of an experienced event organiser to assist with the planning of a programme of activities for part of the site.”