Rules? What rules? They don’t apply to developers

“Just to let you know that last time in December I reported that the Secretary of State overturned the Inspectors decision to grant planning permission for 200 houses outside of the boundary [Lydney, Forest of Dean].

The developer took this to a high court appeal which was meant to be on 13th June 2016. However we heard yesterday that the Secretary of State has pulled out of the appeal and they have now been granted planning, we have not been given a reason why.

This is in spite of Lydney having a NDP and the Forest of Dean having a new allocation in place where on both (the NDP and Allocation) these fields are outside of the boundary and down as recreation with one of the best walks in Lydney with fabulous views (which will now be lost).

The developers are local business men who just wave their cheque book around and seem to get what ever they like.

This is also outline planning and will end up being 400 houses.
A sad day for us
CS “

An odd reason for the Conservatives to choose Zac Goldsmith

“There was also a practical reason why the leadership wanted Goldsmith, who is worth a reputed £280 million. His tax returns reveal he’s received more than £10 million from his trust fund since becoming an MP in 2010.

‘Since he’s as rich as Croesus, the mayoral defeat hasn’t cost the party very much money,’ said the source.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3578080/ANDREW-PIERCE-Cheap-slurs-lazy-toff-didn-t-really-want-job.html

On the other hand, according to Tony Hogg, ex-Police and Crime Commissioner, not spending enough on PCC elections got us Ms Hernandez.

Pays yer money, takes yer choice!

Residents v Developers: the difference between London and Devon

“… Overturning a Conservative majority in the mayoral election [in London] has shown how seriously voters now take housing. Khan is in a strong position to try to force the government to take housing security, demand and affordability more seriously. But he has an uphill struggle between now and 2020, when the mayoral election will coincide with the next general election. With some bold and inventive decisions, he could make a real difference, but he’ll have to decide whether to side with residents or developers.”

http://gu.com/p/4jvbv

No such choice to be made in Devon. Our LEP, which will control such decisions post-devolution, wants 179,000 extra houses and, as its Chairman is also the Chairman of Midas developers, and many of the LEP board have vested interests in development, there will be no worries about which side it will choose.

Scandal brushed under the carpet … while another candidate benefits

The Hernandez story (Tory PCC candidate may be investigated by police over alleged general election fraud) has still not appeared in any regional press or on regional TV, but a “letter” from a candidate of another mainstream political party, which includes that candidate’s VERY long manifesto for the post in full, HAS appeared.

Explain.

“Will it be independents’ day at England’s biggest parish council?”

The latest “Anywhere but Westminster” report on Sutton Coldfield.

” … If there is a common theme shared by the 14 independents, it is that their town is in need of revival, and that neither Labour nor Conservatives have served it well. There is also a pragmatic acceptance that, given current funding pressures, the local improvements they want will not be funded by Birmingham city council.

… Rushton describes how, starting in 2011, his group sat under a gazebo in the main shopping area every Saturday, gathering 10,000 signatures on the petition that led to last year’s referendum. This asked residents whether they wanted a new town council, with the power to raise a local tax known as “the parish precept”, or not. All sides in that campaign knew there was strong support for the idea of independence from Birmingham. Some “old Suttonians”, as they are known, regret the 1974 decision to make them part of Britain’s second city. But Rob Pocock, Sutton’s sole Labour city councillor, says the 70% yes vote last July (on a 40% turnout) “stunned everybody”. …

… Sutton Coldfield has become a dogfight. Conservative association chairman Ewan Mackey accused Rushton of trying to send Sutton “down the route of North Korea” when he suggested major political parties should limit their number of candidates to leave room for independents. While Labour, the Liberal Democrats, Greens and Ukip accepted the proposal, the Conservatives aim to win all 24 seats and clothe one of their own in the town’s historic mayoral chains and robes that Birmingham has given back.

… When I suggest that there are centralisers and devolvers in both main parties, meaning these arguments don’t divide neatly into left and right, [Andrew] Mitchell [MP] will have none of it. “It’s the true tradition of Tory localism,” he says. “We want power driven down to the lowest level and will try to make sure the new council has as much power as it can cope with.” Mackey, a Conservative city councillor who is also standing for the town council, voted yes in the referendum but suggests some people did so in the mistaken belief that the Sutton town council would replace Birmingham as the local authority.
… Justin Griggs, head of policy at the National Association of Local Councils, predicts a “mixed bag” of results. What is certain is that there will be some different faces representing residents. Like the independents, all but two of the Conservative town council candidates are new to local politics. Though the Tory party has held Sutton Coldfield’s seat in parliament since 1945, and holds 11 out of 12 city council seats, it recognises that last year’s yes vote was a vote for change.

… Whether Birmingham’s other nine districts decide to follow Sutton Coldfield down the devolution route is unclear. Europe’s largest local authority, with a budget of close to £4bn until recent cuts, has long been seen as unwieldy, but previous attempts at reorganisation have either been rejected or tried and then unwound. Andrew Mitchell thinks that in the end, “Birmingham will be broken up”.”

http://gu.com/p/4tmgt

“Greens call for greater transparency as ‘secret’ plans for ‘super cross-county authority’ emerge”

“The Green Party last night condemned Exeter Labour’s for backing plans which place the ill-fated Hinkley C nuclear power station at the heart of an economic growth plan for the city.

Speaking on the panel at the city’s cultural hustings Diana Moore said: “It is very disappointing that Exeter Labour have backed Tory Councils and the Local Economic Partnership in a plan to build the most expensive building on earth at £18bn in an unviable project which won’t guarantee local jobs.”

The plans are part of the government’s new devolution agenda which would see councils in the region grant more power over spending decisions to unelected representatives from the Local Economic Partnership (LEP) and a controversial new ‘Combined Authority’. The proposed Authority would have wide-ranging powers over Health and Social Care, infrastructure and house building across Devon and Somerset.

Diana, who is lead Green candidate in St David’s ward, says: “This plan for a new combined authority covering Devon, Plymouth, Torbay and Somerset has quietly received the backing of both Labour and the Conservatives in Exeter. It is another example of how important decisions are being made without the involvement of local people.

“It is extraordinary that the city council have entered into an agreement to put in place a large new combined authority and give the unaccountable LEP more influence over planning and spending decisions, without finding out if the people of Exeter wanted to enter into such an arrangement.

“An absence of openness and transparency is sadly all too common within the Labour-led council and the Tories’ top-down model of devolution is so very different to the kind of genuine devolvement of powers that local communities and Greens want to see.”

Diana is calling on the newly elected council on May 5th to call in the plans and engage in genuine consultation.

She concluded: “Green Councillors will challenge plans that are cobbled together behind closed doors and we will work hard to ensure people in Exeter are properly involved in major decisions that affect them.”

Greens call for greater transparency as ‘secret’ plans for ‘super cross-county authority’ emerge

Housing – how they do it in Vienna

“In the Austrian capital, 25% of housing stock is social housing and a further 35% is limited-profit housing-association stock. Housing is seen as a human right. For social housing, you need a lower income initially but then secure tenancy for life, so there is no stigma attached, and one result is socially mixed communities.

High-profile architects such as Norman Foster are enlisted for projects, and good design is nurtured. Subsidised rents are funded by taxes included a land tax; unused sites are taxed higher; and there’s strong protection of tenants’ rights.”

http://gu.com/p/4tmj6

“Illicit enrichment”- tell the government what you think about this possible new offence

“The Government is consulting on the creation of an illicit enrichment offence, “for use when a public official has a significant and inexplicable increase in their assets”.

The proposed offence is included in a package of measures in the Government’s latest action plan for anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist finance.

The Home Office said the aim was to make the UK “a more hostile place for those seeking to move, hide or use the proceeds of crime or corruption”.
The proposals subject to consultation also include the creation of a new power to require individuals to declare their sources of wealth, and the creation of a linked power to seek forfeiture of assets if they fail to declare their sources of wealth.

The closing date for responses to be submitted is 2 June 2016.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=26736%3Ahome-office-targets-public-officials-with-plans-for-illicit-enrichment-offence&catid=59&Itemid=27

Page 57 of this document:

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=26736%3Ahome-office-targets-public-officials-with-plans-for-illicit-enrichment-offence&catid=59&Itemid=27

gives a list of questions the government wants to consult on and

“The Treasury welcomes your views in response to the questions posed in this Annex and would be keen to hear views on how to best deal with the issues raised with a view to making the supervisory regime more effective. This will help ensure evidence-based policy decisions in these areas.

Electronic responses are preferred and should be sent to: aml@hmtreasury.gsi.gov.uk

Questions or enquiries specifically relating to this consultation should also be sent to the above email address.

Please include the words CONSULTATION VIEWS or CONSULTATION ENQUIRY (as appropriate) in your email title. If you do not wish your views to be published alongside the Government response to this consultation, please clearly specify this in your email.

Hard copy responses may be submitted to:

Review of AML/CFT Supervision Sanctions and Illicit Finance Team 1st Floor Blue
HM Treasury
1 Horse Guards Road London
SW1A 2HQ

Greendale pub causing concern in Exeter – fears it may be base for squatters

Uncertainty surrounds the future of a city centre pub – almost four months after it closed. The Mint on Fore Street shut its doors on New Year’s Eve and is yet to reopen. Signs in the windows say it will remain closed “until further notice”.

Owners Greendale Leisure Ltd, based at Woodbury Salterton, have remained tight-lipped about their plans for the venue.
Nearby businesses are unclear about what will happen to the pub.

David O’Callaghan, of Gentry barber shop, said: “There have been all sorts of rumours, but no one is any the wiser. “We have seen people taking out pumps, coolers, chilling units, the fruit machine and pool table. So maybe they aren’t going to keep it as a pub.
“It’s an eyesore, and I’m concerned squatters are going to get in there.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Fears-raised-squatters-enter-closed-Exeter-pub/story-29152755-detail/story.html

Greendale is host to Hugo Swire’s constituency office in Woodbury and he recently opened one of their leisure venues for them. Hugo would surely wish them to be conscientious and public-spirited businessmen.

Government scraps proposed changes to trade union funding – Tory peers not prepared to back the change

It seems there are now THREE Conservative parties: Bremain, Brexit and Bolshie Lords!

U-turn on plan to abolish ‘check-off’ system follows threatened rebellion in Lords and will be seen as major victory for unions:

The government is to drop a controversial proposal to change trade union funding arrangements after a threatened rebellion in the House of Lords.

Under plans included in the trade union bill all civil servants and staff in the wider public sector who belong to a union would have had to switch to direct debits or make other arrangements to pay their fees.

But a cabinet office minister admitted the government had failed to convince Tory peers to vote for the proposal and said it would be dropped from the bill.

The decision will be seen as a major victory for public sector unions which had claimed the proposal was a vindictive attack on their finances.

Tories forced to rethink trade union crackdown after Lords defeat
Critics had warned that a switch to direct debit payments would see members leave trade unions and no longer be able to access services they provided such as help with cheap loans, debt advice and legal aid.

In the report stage debate in the Lords,the cabinet office minister Lord Bridges acknowledged many Tory peers opposed the measure.

“I fear that my trying to convince you of our case may simply add grist to the mill of those who see this measure as a means of undermining trade unions themselves. This is certainly not and never has been the government’s intention,” he said. ….”

http://gu.com/p/4tf3q

Politics can descend to an even lower level – Prime Minister proves it

“Break out the mind-bleach, the Prime Minister has been telling smutty jokes again”

The Prime Minister ordered MPs to trek to posh hotel in deepest Chipping Norton on Thursday night, hoping to calm the party’s worsening civil war over Europe.

The evening was lubricated by a free bar – with a £2,000 tab reportedly laid on by Mr Cameron’s buddy, the millionaire Tory chairman Lord Feldman.

And after a lavish dinner, the PM himself got up to deliver a brief speech. …” …

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-cameron-told-joke-rough-7772891

Guidance to Chief council officers on Referendum

“SOLACE [the trade union for council CEOs and senior officers] has produced guidance for chief officers ahead of the EU referendum on 23 June.

Dr Dave Smith, SOLACE Spokesperson on Elections and Democratic Renewal, said: “The purpose of this document is to provide advice and guidance on the statutory rules regulating publicity produced at any time by the council or by other persons with the council’s assistance; the tighter rules on council publicity produced by the council in the run up to polling day for the EU referendum; and the areas of the council’s operations which are affected by the referendum process.”

The specific areas covered in the guidance, which can be viewed here, are:

publicity produced or facilitated by the council:

the Local Government Act 1986;

Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity; s. 125 Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (PPERA);

assistance to campaigners at the referendum poll;

use of council premises: for campaigners’ meetings; campaigners’ posters and other advertising;

visits to council premises by elected representatives such as MSPs, MPs, MEPs, and campaigners;

promoting political literacy in schools in connection with the referendum;
council employees in politically restricted posts;

time off work for council employees: for polling purposes; for campaigning;
frequently asked questions and answers.

The guidance on the referendum was produced with input from the Cabinet Office, the Electoral Commission and Lawyers in Local Government.

Many chief officers are expected to serve as counting officers for the referendum.

“As a consequence,” the guidance says, “such officers should be aware that in due course, they will be acting as Counting Officers (or working for the Counting Officer) in an entirely neutral capacity. Such officers should be aware of this now, and take account of this in what views they express now in regard to EU in this context.

“As senior and seasoned public servants, senior officers will naturally manage their behaviour in regard to party politics. Expressing views on Europe (on social media for example) may not feel a potential issue at this stage but it will still be subject to public scrutiny as the referendum approaches.

“As a consequence, senior officers who are likely to be undertaking a role in the EU referendum should be mindful of their actions and words in their day job in relation to Europe given the forthcoming referendum.”

The document also advises chief officers, “particularly those who hold the roles of Head of Paid Service (HoPS) or Monitoring Officer (MO)”, to give consideration to providing some proactive (rather than reactive) guidance to officers.

“Unlike ‘normal’ elections, the traditional political divides along party lines may not apply. However, similar expectations and issues may arise, some legitimate and some illegitimate. It is a matter for the HoPS and MO to give advice and guidance to the officers on matters such as those set out in this guidance. The provision of early proactive advice will avoid a vacuum and uncertainty, or worse a vacuum which may be filled by others (not necessarily correctly or reflecting the advice which the HoPS / MO would wish to give),” the guidance says.

SOLACE’s Smith pointed out that the document was guidance, and as such, it had no formal status. “Each issue will be a matter for that council or chief officer and each council or chief officer will wish to adapt and interpret this guidance to meet their own local circumstances,” he said.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=26657%3Asolace-produces-guidance-note-for-chief-officers-on-eu-referendum&catid=59&Itemid=27

Our CEO and Monitoring Officer have undoubtedly received this guidance. Not sure if our MP will know about it though. No visits to council premises, Hugo – not that we see much of him but he might be tempted away from his home in mid-Devon to pay us visits before the end of June to help his friend and old school mate Dave. Or then again they might both decide to go on holiday to the Caribbean – lovely places like the British Virgin Islands, the Caymans or Panama – the weather is lovely there this time of year.

Final details of Exmouth poll – at last!

“… The poll will be on Wednesday, April 20, between 4pm and 9pm.

All Exmouth residents on the electoral register can vote. There are no polling cards for the poll.

Most voters should go to their usual polling station – if they are unsure where this is, recently sent out polling cards for May’s unrelated Police and Crime Commissioner election should have the details.

There are the following exceptions to this. Voters who usually go to Liverton Copse Community Centre should go to St John the Evangelist Church Hall, Withycombe. Voters who usually go to Littlemead Methodist Church Hall should go next door to the church itself.

There is also a new station for the poll at the Kennaway Centre, 10-12 Victoria Road, which is for voters who live in Alexandra Terrace, Alston Terrace, Beacon Hill, Beacon Place, Bicton Street, Bicton Place, Camperdown Terrace, Chapel Hill, Church Street, Cleveland Place, Clinton Square, Criterion Place, Elm Grove, Esplanade, Fore Street, Harbour Court, High Street, Imperial Road, King Street, Little Bicton Place, Lower Fore Street, Magnolia Walk, Mamhead View, Manchester Road, Manchester Street, Montpelier Road, Morton Crescent, Morton Crescent Mews, Morton Road, Pier Head, Point Terrace, Pound Street, Queen Street, Queens Court, Rolle Road, Rolle Street, Rolle Villas, Sharps Court, Shelly Reach, Shelly Road, South Street, St Andrew’s Road, The Beacon, The Strand, Tower Street, Trinity Road, Union Street, Upper Church Street and Victoria Road.

Other polling stations are All Saints Church Hall, Brixington Community Church, Clayton House Community Centre, Holy Ghost Church Hall, Littleham Community Hall, Palmer House, and Withycombe Rugby Club.”

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/final_details_released_for_exmouth_seafront_poll_1_4492528

Less than a week before the poll and still confusion. Head(s) rolling? Hmmm.

There are some things the French do with more flair than us!

“French police started to evacuate the Place de la Republique in Paris on Monday morning (11 April) after a protest movement that started there extended to more than 60 towns and cities over the weekend.
But the move is unlikely to stop the protest movement.

The so-called Nuit Debout movement, which can be translated as “stand up at night”, began on 31 March as protest against a labour market reform presented by the left-wing government.


The El Khomri law, named after the labour minister Myriam El Khomri, mainly makes it easier and less costly for employers to lay off staff, and requires workers to be more flexible on working hours.

Inspired by the 2011 Indignados movement in Spain, the Nuit Debout is a makeshift camp where people talk about the reform, but also about politics in general in committees and a “popular assembly”.

Music is played, artistic happenings are created and a library has been set up. The Nuit Debout has its own website and media – Radio Debout and TV Debout – and even its own calendar. Today is 42 March. …

… Several politicians asked the government to stop the movement. Former centre-right prime minister Francois Fillon said he was “shocked” that the movement was “tolerated” under the state of emergency imposed after the November attacks.

Last week the centre-left mayor of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, objected to the movement’s “privatisation” of the public area.

Criticism from politicians from the left and right is a reflection of the Nuit Debout’s opposition to the political parties as a whole.

“Politics is not something for professionals, it is for everybody,” the movement’s manifesto says.

“The human should be at the core of our leaders’ preoccupations. Vested interests have overridden the general interest.”

Nuit Debout has no leader and has been wary of support from any politicians. Instead, it has been wooing trade unions.

However, although the unions are broadly critical proposed labour market reform, they do not seem to be interested in a wider movement that they would have difficulty managing.”…

https://euobserver.com/beyond-brussels/132993

“Devon and Cornwall’s green spaces at risk from ‘opportunistic’ developers” say MPs

EDDC Asset Management Forum is holding its next meeting with no background papers available(see post earlier today. One agenda item is ” Green Spaces Policy”. Perhaps they might read this in advance of the meeting:

““Government planning policy is leaving Devon and Cornwall’s green spaces open to opportunistic developers, a new report by MPs has warned.

According to the study, there is nothing to prevent developers from sitting on brownfield land until councils are required to free up “more profitable” greenfield.

There is also little to guarantee more houses will be built on the spaces made available, it adds, with many councils still lacking local plans.

The damning report from the Communities and Local Government select committee calls for a full review of the Government’s National Planning Policy Framework. Members say there has not been a sufficient robust evaluation of the policy since its introduction in 2012, and ministers must prove it can “work effectively” to support sustainable development.

The framework was designed to speed up the planning system and deliver more new and affordable homes. This included an emphasis on plans “conserving and enhancing the natural environment.

However, the CLG committee has raised concerns about the lack of measures to prevent developers delaying work on challenging brownfield sites. And the MPs say they are “not persuaded” that the Government’s new Housing and Planning Bill – currently progressing through Parliament – will address this.

“We have particular concerns about the risk that developers will delay developing brownfield sites because local authorities will be required to release more profitable greenfield sites if insufficient housing is delivered to meet local needs,” the group writes.

“The lower viability and higher costs of developing brownfield sites may be a deterrent for some developers.

“The Government should set out how its proposals will overcome the potential cost barriers to the development of brownfield sites, and the steps it will take to encourage the development of such sites in order to meet local housing needs.”

The report also stresses that 34% of local authorities have not adopted a Local Plan setting out their strategic priorities for development, despite the 2017 deadline for submission. According to Government registers, Cornwall, North Devon, Torridge and West Devon councils are all yet to finalise their plans.

Chairman Clive Betts said local authorities should be doing more to identify suitable brownfield sites and protect communities “against the threat of undesirable development”. And he said ministers need to act to put pressure on “dawdling” councils.

Peter Heaton-Jones said many of the issues highlighted in the report are mirrored by in his constituency. He said that the absence of a local plan has created a “vacuum” in the area for “opportunistic” developers.

“I’ve been working with North Devon Council to help finalise our plan as soon as possible,” he said. “As the CLG committee report shows, more than a third of all councils are in the same boat, so we do need to look at this.

“I also share the report’s concern about possible development of greenfield sites. We must always seek to build on brownfield sites first.

“And it would help if developers actually built the homes they’ve been given permission for already, rather than sitting on the land hoping to increase its value.”

North Devon Lib Dem councillor Brian Greenslade said he hopes ministers “will listen and act” on the recommendations of the report. “In my part of the Westcountry we have seen examples of ‘land banking’, and of developers merely obtaining planning permission without any intention of developing sites themselves,” he said.

“If the Housing Bill is passed… the planning proposals will simply give developers a open goal to get their development plans accepted, adding to the problem the select committee report has identified.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Devon-Cornwall-s-green-spaces-lack-protection/story-29033019-detail/story.html

East Devon Businesses: your chance for “expert advice” from an LEP “pop-up” cafe in Exeter

on 6 April 2016 at the Fresha Cafe, Sowton, 8am – midday:

https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/heart-of-the-south-west-pop-up-business-cafe-exeter-registration-22583110692

Register and then book hourly slots with experts on marketing, finance, business strategy, skills, regulation, the Hinkley supply chain or a regulation expert (presumably a maximum of four different sessions).

Of the 24 session slots on offer, so far only 2 of the marketing slots are booked – the other 22 are unbooked.

Just one question: just WHO are these “experts” and how much are they being paid to attend these events all over Devon and Somerset?

Owl would want to be sure that taking a morning off its ceaseless job of hunting vermin would be worth it.

Inquiry: Environmental impact of micro plastics- call for evidence

Anyone interested in the role of micro-plastics in the marine environment may wish to provide evidence to this government inquiry:

https://t.co/2EBeE1lr2B