Academies: backlash in Tory shires

There is no such thing as “If it ain’t broke don’t fix it” with this Government. When there is money to be made, it must be made.

All in East Devon will be forced to seek investors and change to academy status within the next three years. Their land will go with them, free of charge.

Wainhomes Academy or Persimmon Academy anyone?

“The government is facing opposition from its supporters on Conservative-held county councils who are angry about plans to force all schools to become academies.

Leading Tory councillors across the country, dismayed by key elements of the education white paper outlined by the government last week, are calling on education secretary Nicky Morgan to rethink her policy of compulsory academisation for all schools.

Their concerns echo those of many teachers and parents, who took part in rallies in London and many other towns and cities on Wednesday, to protest against the government’s forced academy programme.

Around the country, councillors – many of them lifelong Tories who have devoted decades to working with schools in their areas and in many cases improving attainment – expressed profound reservations about the changes.”

http://gu.com/p/4hzag

Vital flood research funding cut by two-thirds

“Funding for “vital” research to improve flood forecasts, warnings and defences has been slashed by almost two-thirds since 2009, figures obtained by the Guardian show.

The annual funding for flood research and development, which the government has not published, has fallen from £4.89, in 2008-09 to £1.85m in 2015-16, a drop of 62%.

“The government says evidence is required but they have cut the R&D [research and development] budget that could have provided it,” said Prof Edmund Penning-Rowsell, at the Flood Hazard Research Centre at Middlesex University and a member of a group that advises the government on its flood R&D programme, which he also previously chaired.

“David Cameron is dead keen on security in relation to the EU issue, but what about security at home, protecting people, houses and businesses from flooding?”

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/mar/10/vital-uk-flood-research-funding-slashed-by-nearly-two-thirds

Remember that promise of a “cost neutral” new HQ?


“Many of the workspace opportunities had previously been delayed owing to the previous uncertainties around the office relocation project and the cost of finance; …

Click to access 100316amfcombinedagenda.pdf

And here is the good news …

Look forward to a LOT of pothole filling in the next few months as (some) East Devon roads are made safe for Tour of Britain cycle riders when the have their Sidmouth – Ottery – Honiton section on Friday 9th September.

We wouldn’t want THEM falling off their bikes or their back-up cars getting broken axles.

Quote of the day

“The people of England regards itself as free; but it is grossly mistaken; it is free only during the election of members of parliament. As soon as they are elected, slavery overtakes it, and it is nothing.”

Jean-Jaques Rousseau, “The Social Contract”, 1762

District councils and LEPs didn’t exist in 1762!

Planning decision quashed: council made decision while application was with Secretary of State for decision on EIA

“Whilst the local authority was not precluded from granting planning permission in such circumstances it ran the risk that if that direction was positive it would then have granted a planning consent which was infected with illegality, as was the case here. The judge also remarked that he would also have been minded to conclude that no reasonable planning authority, knowing when they formed a resolution to grant planning permission that there was an outstanding request of the Secretary of State to make a determination on a screening direction, would proceed to grant planning permission without knowing the outcome of that screening direction process. Accordingly, the permission was quashed.

While the facts are a little unusual it is now clear that where both a third party and the Secretary of State become involved prior to a planning determination, it is advisable always to allow EIA procedures to run their full course, however desirous it may be to secure an early planning permission. Given that the Secretary of State is under no timing restrictions, unlike a local authority, that could be many months. So, the Roskilly case now sits as another and telling reminder amongst EIA jurisprudence that screening considerations should never be treated lightly, and, that unreasonableness can still be a successful ground to challenge that process.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=25999:eia-trumping&catid=63&Itemid=31

Swindon Council to fight decision by inspector to grant permission for 100-home


Swindon Borough Council is to bring a High Court challenge over a planning inspector’s decision to grant an appeal by a developer seeking to build up to 100 homes on a site.

Ainscough Strategic Land brought the appeal over the site at Berkeley Farm in Wroughton after Swindon’s planning committee refused its application. The appeal was heard over four days in November 2015.

The council has taken legal advice “from a leading planning QC” and will challenge the inspector’s decision under section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

Swindon said its legal advice suggested that the inspector had erred in law in two respects:

He failed to properly apply the legal test under section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, “which requires that planning decisions are made by having regard to a local authority’s Local Plan, unless material considerations indicate otherwise”.

He misdirected himself in law “by suggesting in his report that the level of the shortfall in the council’s required five-year housing land supply is immaterial to his decision”.

Cllr Toby Elliott, Swindon Borough Council cabinet member for Communities and Strategic Planning, said: “The planning inspector’s decision is a disastrous one and we must stand up for local people and the integrity of the Local Plan process by challenging it. I am pleased that the legal advice we have been given supports this position.

“I hope this announcement gives the residents of Wroughton, who came together and produced a neighbourhood plan for their area, confidence that the council is doing everything it can to challenge the planning inspector’s decision.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=26016:council-to-fight-decision-by-inspector-to-grant-permission-for-100-home-scheme&catid=63&Itemid=31

MEPs and an EU deal …

Owl isn’t hooting about its EU views but has to say that Dave saying MEPs agree with it (whatever it is) is hardly surprising:

they get hundreds of thousands of pounds in pay;

they get hundreds of thousands of pounds in allowances including €275,000 for assistants;

they get massive pensions and pay-offs.

Do you agree with Christmas, Santa Claus?

Colyton Parish Council in trouble again

Honestly, with an ex parish councillor who is a district councillor and ex-chair of the EDDC Planning Committee (not to mention wife of the current Chair of Colyton Parish Council) you really would think they would have some expertise with a Neighbourhood Plan. On second thoughts … scrub that!

image

Text:

THE development of Colyton Parish Neighbourhood Plan has got off to a rocky start with resignations and claims that the parish council, which is leading the project, has acted in a “threatening, aggressive and hostile” manner towards volunteers.

After a slow start on the plan, issues came to a head at last Monday’s council meeting, where volunteers complained that they had been accused of “having a shindig at the parish council’s expense” after suggesting that wine and nibbles would be available at a neighbourhood plan meeting.

Last year, Colyton Parish Council agreed to develop a neighbourhood plan, which will shape how the parish is developed in future years, and asked for volunteers to come forward to work on the project. Separate committees were set up in Colyton and Colyford, consisting of both councillors and volunteers, to deal with the individual issues which faced the two communities, as well as an overarching steering group to bring representatives from the two committees together.

The steering group met for the first time earlier this month, where it was agreed that an informal meeting would be held on February 24th for the two committees to get to know one another and potentially form working parties, and it was suggested that wine and nibbles would be available.

Parish clerk Liz Berry disagreed with the format of the meeting, saying that the council could not pay for wine and nibbles and that any neighbourhood plan meeting should follow official guidelines, which resulted in a number of emails being circulated between the clerk and volunteers.

Former Mayor of Colyford and chairman of the neighbourhood plan’s Colyford committee, Howard West, spoke in the public forum of last week’s parish council meeting, saying he was “offended” by comments made in the emails, which he described as “the last straw”.

The next day he announced his resignation from the neighbourhood plan committee, claiming that he and his wife had been threatened by a member of the parish council. But parish council chairman Andrew Parr claimed that Mr West had been fighting a “turf war” between Colyton and Colyford and said he now hoped to be able to move forward with the plan.

Frustrating

Speaking at the parish council meeting before his resignation, Mr West said: “Today, as far as I’m concerned, was the last straw. I have had 13 emails today and I’m quite offended that we’re being accused of having a ‘shindig’ at the parish council’s expense.

“It is so frustrating; everything we’re trying to do for the neighbourhood plan is for the good of the parish and we never had any intention of asking the parish council to fund what the parish clerk calls a ‘shindig’, which is isn’t, it’s a meeting of all the people involved in the two committees of the neighbourhood plan to get to know one another.

“Does the parish council really want us to do a neighbourhood plan, because every time we try to move forward we get pushed back a step? I’ve spent nearly all day today trying to deal with this problem and it’s not just me, a lot of other people are quite upset about the way we have been treated… we can’t just let it carry on like this.”

Fellow Colyford resident Diane Nason commented: “I second that. I went to a steering group meeting last week and I was quite apprehensive about it because what has been coming from the council has, it seems to me, been quite aggressive, hostile.”

Mrs Berry said: “Having got the message that there would be an informal meeting of the two committees potentially to form working groups, obviously decisions would be made at the meeting.

“Anything to do with the neighbourhood plan has to be a community engagement exercise, open to public, have an agenda, be minuted, and as a council we can’t fund a get together where there’s wine and nibbles, and I’ve been told by the chairman that the public would not be allowed to go to it. It’s not a meeting to form working groups, you can’t make decisions.

“As the responsible financial officer for the council’s money, which is indeed public money, we can’t fund a shindig, a party, a get together – call it what you like. We can fund a meeting that makes decisions. You don’t need wine and peanuts.”

Councillor Huntley Evans, who sits on the neighbourhood plan steering group, said: “Let’s not undo the good work that we did last week. In all innocence it was suggested that the two committees get together, mostly with the idea that, for the vast majority of things which affect this community, the two committees would be able to work as one.

“I propose that we carry on with our meeting of the two committees; we don’t need wine or nibbles, perhaps we’ll have a cup of tea or cake, and we’ll carry on as planned.”

Mrs Berry asked if the meeting would be open to the public. Councillor Evans said it would be, and that an agenda could be published in advance.

“That’s the way I suggest we go forward and diffuse this rather unnecessary spat,” he added.

Mr West added: “That’s exactly what it was all about but all these emails that were flying around today were totally uncalled for.”

Mrs Nason commented: “It’s not just today, it’s been the same for some time. There are other people involved in neighbourhood plans in other areas and they’re very happy groups but I have to say, if this is a neighbourhood plan there’s not been very much neighbourly about it. I’m getting quite upset about it.”

Later in the meeting Councillor Evans gave a full report on the steering group meeting held earlier this month. Members made no further comments on the matter, prompting Councillor Paul Dean to ask if the council was going to address concerns raised during the public forum.

“What’s the council’s views on what has been said? People are upset and we either need to allay their fears or not. We can’t just say, ‘OK, they’ve said their piece and we’re not even going to listen, discuss it or anything’,” he said.

Mrs Berry then explained the situation again, adding that there was “no way” that public money could be spent on drinks and nibbles. She said that after questioning the meeting she received a “flurry of emails” saying it was just a “get to know you” event.

“Working in working groups you’ll get to know each other,” she continued.
“If you’re having a meeting it has to be properly advertised, it has to have an agenda and minutes. If you’re going to make decisions then it all has to be open and transparent, open to the public.”

Councillor Evans said he would ensure that the meeting on February 24th was publicised.

Speaking to Pulman’s View later that week, Mr West announced that he was resigning from the neighbourhood plan committee and standing down from “involvement in all Colyford village affairs”. He reported that he and his wife Anne had been “accused of splitting the village in two”, had received verbal threats from a parish councillor, and another member of the Colyford committee had received similar threats and had also since resigned.

In his letter of resignation, Mr West said: “After attending the Colyton Parish Council meeting last night, and making an impassioned plea in public question time for the parish council to let us all get on with the neighbourhood plan, I came away totally demoralised and feeling intimidated by the parish council once more.

Mr West went on to explain the situation regarding the planned “social get together” and expressed disappointment that Councillor Evans was “forced to concede that it would not be a social evening”.

He added: “Councillor Evans cannot and should not be allowed or encouraged to arbitrarily alter what was agreed at the steering group meeting. This can only be democratically done at the next steering group meeting. “I therefore feel that there is no further point in me continuing as your elected chairman, and I resign with immediate effect. The treatment yesterday was in addition to the verbal threats given to my wife Anne and I a few weeks ago by a councillor. This has been followed by a resignation of a member of our Colyford neighbourhood plan ommittee, who has received similar threats also from a councillor.

“The continuous intimation from the parish council, its parish clerk and some councillors is totally unnecessary and should stop immediately. I do feel that I have let you all down, but enough is enough, let someone else have a go.

“I will now stand down from involvement in all Colyford village affairs and leave it to others, especially as Anne and I are accused of splitting the village of Colyford in two! Those who are against what we are trying to achieve have won. Let them get on with it! We have worked hard over the last 10 years or so with the sole aim of improving things in Colyford and the surrounding area.”

Private Eye Rotten Boroughs Awards 2015

And what a magnificent bunch they are … so many troughs, so many pigs … so many snouts. Here are the awards in all their glory:

FROM the council in Waltham Forest that for two years hired out a room for “ladies tea afternoons” to what turned out to be a group of burqa-clad Isis supporters, to the council employees in Wigan who were caught sleeping on the job by a TV crew making a documentary about how dynamic they were, here are the gongs awarded by Lord Gnome for the most egregious municipal mishaps – and worse – in 2015…

WEIGHTWATCHER OF THE YEAR:
Michael Jones, Tory leader of Cheshire East council, revealed last month that he had lost an impressive six-and-a-half stone since engaging the services of local physiotherapist Amanda Morris, whom he described as “awesome”. Alas Cllr Jones also announced that he will be stepping down next month. This is a consequence of Eye 1403’s revelation that council contracts for fitness classes, worth £156,000, had gone Ms Morris’s way without a normal tendering process.

PARTY UNITY AWARD:
to Ukip, which triumphantly took control of its first council, Thanet, in May, then quickly lost it as the ’kippers fell out among themselves in a series of bitter personal squabbles.

GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN:
former Tower Hamlets mayor Lutfur Rahman, who was barred from office for five years after being found guilty by an electoral court in April of “corrupt and illegal practices”, including vote-rigging and bribery. As the winner of multiple Rotten Boroughs awards over the years, Lutfur will be missed. Somehow it feels that we have not heard the last of him.

WITCHFINDER OF THE YEAR:
When Larne council in Northern Ireland voted to put up a memorial to eight local women who were persecuted and jailed for “witchcraft” in 1711, Alderman Jack McKee of the Traditional Unionist Voice party voted against because he “couldn’t be sure” they were wrongly convicted and was worried the plaque would become a “shrine to paganism”.

SERVICES TO DEMOCRACY:
Disgraced former Guildford Tory councillor Monika Juneja, who narrowly escaped going to prison in June after being found guilty on charges of forgery, deception and falsely claiming to be a barrister, kept up the good work by raising a petition in favour of an elected mayoral system for the town. Thousands of signatures were obtained by Surrey university students, who were paid £1 per signature by Juneja. Monika’s “very close friend”, council leader Stephen Mansbridge, was widely believed to have mayoral ambitions but denied having any involvement in the petition. In October local website the Guildford Dragon revealed that he had, in fact, secretly lobbied the students’ union to back the idea. Mansbridge resigned shortly afterwards.

MONEY AND MOUTH AWARD:
Independent Allerdale councillor Jim Lister’s election leaflets campaigned against “unnecessary windfarms blighting our countryside” – a vexed issue in a borough with more of the useless eyesores than the rest of Cumbria put together. He forgot to mention that six months earlier he’d applied for and won permission for a 113ft turbine on his own farm.

UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES AWARD:
The deputy leader of South Lanarkshire council, Jackie Burns, was fined for peeing in public outside a nightclub at 2am. He had no choice – there are no public toilets in the Labour council’s area because it has closed them all to save money.

COMBATING EXTREMISM:
Until an undercover Channel 4 reporter discovered the truth, for two years Labour Waltham Forest council hired out a room for “ladies tea afternoons” to a group of burqa-clad women… who turned out to be an Isis supporters’ group.

GREENWASH AWARD:
Bristol’s mayor George Fergusoncelebrated more than 200 electric car charging points having opened in the area since 2012, at a total cost of more than £1m. The Bristol Post discovered that each one was used on average fewer than eight times a year.

COMEBACK KID:
Sixteen years after resigning as a Lancashire county councillor and West Lancashire district councillor when exposed by this column (Eye 987) for deliberately falsifying a local MP’s election expenses, Frank McKenna was re-elected to the latter council in May. In these difficult times the Labour party needs every honest man it can get.

DEARLY DEPARTED AWARD:
Runner-up: Coventry city council’s Labour leadership got out the onions after the sudden death of the council’s deputy leader, solicitor Phil Townshend, saying he had been held in “deep affection… locally, nationally and internationally” and spent more than £8,000 on funeral costs and a reception afterwards… while ignoring the fact that Townshend was the subject of a police fraud investigation into how he had come to acquire the home of an elderly vulnerable woman who was one of his clients. Winner: Nuneaton and Bedworth council said it would be flying the borough flag at half-mast on the day of the funeral of former Labour mayor Bill Deacon as a mark of respect. The flag remained unlowered after someone remembered that dear Bill had been jailed in 1994 for child sex offences.

WHITEWASH AWARD:
to Norfolk county council (NCC) whose children’s services department was rated “inadequate” by Ofsted for the second time in three years. In February one of the department’s managers, Peter Barron, was sacked after the Eye exposed how he had manufactured evidence which led to a child being removed from a blameless foster carer. Despite further Eye stories about Barron’s unethical behaviour, he secured a job managing a private children’s home to which NCC remains happy to send looked-after children. In the wake of the Barron scandal the council’s £1,000-a-day interim children’s services boss Sheila Lock set up an “independent” review chaired by former Middlesbrough chief exec Ian Parker into the council’s treatment of foster carers. Nine months on it is still to report, but has excluded the county’s main body representing foster carers and, according to emails between Lock and Parker seen by the Eye, was at pains to only offer “a small window” for complaints.

FINANCIAL PROBITY AWARD:
Ripon councillor Andrew Williams, who had previously been found guilty of stealing hundreds of pounds raised by the council from the sale of ice-creams during the Queen’s diamond jubilee in 2012, was made chair of… the finance committee.

WORKPLACE SAFETY:
The London borough of Waltham Forestwas fined £66,000 with £16,000 costs for failing to protect staff and public from asbestos on its premises. The council had known about the deadly dust in its basement since 1984 but had done nothing about it until 2012, despite being ordered to undertake remedial work by the Heath and Safety Executive in 2002.

PR TRIUMPH OF THE YEAR:
Runner-up: After a Labour councillor in Stoke-on-Trent was caught using false names to praise his own council in text messages to local radio, Cheshire Eastcouncil’s Tory leader Michael Jonesboasted that on his mobile it was “all me”. It was then revealed that Jones’s clunky tweets were actually written by council press officers. Winner: Wigan council, whose attempt to get some free publicity by participating in a TV documentary about how brilliant and dynamic it was backfired badly when cameras caught council staff asleep on the job, nicking off early to play darts and moaning about their bosses.

BRASS-NECK AWARD:
to Liverpool mayor Joe Anderson, who spent nearly £90,000 of council-taxpayers’ money on legal bills fighting his dismissal from a £4,500-a-year part-time job as a school “learning mentor”. Despite having not actually carried out any duties since 2010, when he became council leader, later mayor, Anderson continued to be paid until 2012. When the school then, not unreasonably, decided to dispense with his non-existent services, Joe (salary £80,000+ p.a.) called in m’learned friends – and lost.

QUOTES OF THE YEAR
“Sometimes it’s difficult to tell the difference between the dead and the living when it comes to Berwick councillors.” – local resident after Berwick-upon-Tweed council held a minute’s silence for a “deceased” former mayor who turned out to be alive and well and living in New Zealand.

“He must be blind.” – Torbay mayor Gordon Oliver’s retort at Lib-Dem opponent Steve Darling’s apparent inability to appreciate the benefits of Tory rule in Torbay. Cllr Darling is blind.

“Just told the local Big Issue seller to fuck off back to Romania.” – Dover Tory councillor Bob Frost makes his contribution to the immigration debate via Twitter.

“Flashy freebies.” – Richmond council’s high-minded Tory leader, Lord True, refusing free Olympic tickets, 2012.
“Thank you very much.” – Lord True accepting free Rugby World Cup tickets, 2015.

“Once you’ve got in your car you might just as well go the extra mile.” – Cardiff Labour councillor Iona Gordon attempts to explain the environmental benefits of closing half the city’s recycling centres, thereby making people drive further to dump their waste.

http://www.private-eye.co.uk/issue-1409/rotten-boroughs

Relocated MPs could be forced to be t-total under Sharia Law!

No, it isn’t 1 April!

“The Department of Health, the Whitehall location where MPs could be temporarily rehoused, is governed by Sharia law because the building was transferred to finance an Islamic bond scheme. …

… Richmond House is one of three Whitehall buildings that were transferred to the £200million Islamic bond scheme, which switched their ownership from British taxpayers to wealthy Middle Eastern businessmen and banks.
George Osborne announced the move in June 2014 as part of an effort to make the UK a global hub for Islamic finance. …”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3422642/MPs-moved-Westminster-barred-drinking-Sharia-law.html

“Systems Thinking” EDDC style or: how to compliment the naked emperor on his beautiful robes!

Tucked away on page 155 of the 6 Jan 2016 Cabinet papers is the Monthly Performance Report November 2015 with a hot link to the “Systems Thinking Reports for Housing, Development Management and Revenues and Benefits”.

For our planning officers (or Management Development Team) “Systems Thinking” tells us something very profound: work pressures are still high and complex due to lack of adopted Local Plan; and its adoption will greatly assist with morale and workloads.

The essence of “Systems Thinking” is to think “in the round” or – if you are flogging it as a consultant “holistically”. When doing so, you might think this would include how the policies under review might affect the long-suffering residents of East Devon, who have had to watch this management-speak jingoistic fiasco play out since the first early attempts at drafting of the Local Plan were published for consultation in 2002. Alas, not.

“Systems Thinking” might also tell us that if you don’t answer the exam questions you are not likely to pass the exam!

The principal reasons Inspector Thickett threw out the Draft Local Plan, sent to him in 2014 were: that the housing targets were not based on empirical evidence; there was no 5 year land supply; the plan period was too short (given the time it had taken to draft); and there was no plan for Gypsies and Travellers. Not much systems thinking there then!

In July 2015 we had the Public Examination of EDDC’s exam resit after Inspector Thickett put a halt on all the foot-dragging and imposed a timetable for it.

As a result of this Public Examination, Inspector Thickett has decided to make the decision on the overall housing target himself, presumably after running out of patience. EDDC’s reaction to his other concern – that divvying up 5% of the target to small towns and villages was arbitrary and not based on evidence – has been to simply remove the target. End of problem? Maybe not as some villages will almost certainly be forced to have to have some development (see Chardstock below, and Dunkeswell) unless Mr Thickett can sort that out too.

On the 5-year land supply the developers have written at length explaining that although they might have been granted sufficient (indeed, more than sufficient) planning permissions, there are very good reasons (to them) why build out rates are falling behind. This is not, as most people would claim, to keep house prices artificially high. The developers don’t give any alternative explanation, they just argue that more land should be released for more building ( or non- building, which would mean releasing more land ad infinitum. It should be noted that, as a penalty for not having a Local Plan or a 5-year land supply, the Government adds an extra 20% to this land supply target, so developers could play this out for decades to come!

For many years the draft Local Plan covered the 20 year period 2006 to 2026. For reasons known only to EDDC, the current draft runs for 18 years from 2013 to 2031. The minimum time horizon for a Plan is 15 years. We are now in 2016, having wasted another three years of the revised Plan period. So things are getting tight again, depending on how Inspector Thickett interprets this. Another year’s delay could mean back to the drawing-board – again.

Inspector Thickett himself has decided that, in order to speed things up, he must draft the missing Gypsies and Travellers policy himself. But EDDC has managed to put a spoke in that wheel by announcing that it wants most places around Cranbrook – not, of course, popular with the new locals there!

During the Local Plan Examination another potential show stopper became apparent. This is that EDDC had failed to get Natural England to agree on how EDDC proposes to meet the habitat mitigation regulations to offset all the building, something that is a legal requirement. This is one of those compulsory exam questions that EDDC hadn’t really attempted to answer. Despite being asked by the Inspector to go away and reach agreement with Natural England, it is clear from EDDC’s latest submission (how many resits do you get to take?) that they now expect him to adjudicate between them and Natural England, too. Yet again, not much evidence of systems or thinking!

You might have thought that the Exmouth Masterplan, if it is going to achieve anything substantive, should be an important element of the new Local Plan. But all references to it have been removed from the current Local Plan draft because meeting the habitat conditions in this case would take a couple of years at least. Does “Systems Thinking” include anticipating problems and planning ahead?

Lastly, poor Chardstock! Classified as a village unsuitable for further development up until the last moment (thanks to some nifty footwork from Councillor Andrew Moulding), then suddenly and without explanation reclassified as “suitable for sustainable development”, its fate now depends upon Inspector Thickett’s reading of the local bus time-table!

So let us give Cllr Paul Diviani the last word, from his Christmas/New year message:

“Finally, it gives me enormous pleasure to say that the finalisation of our Local Plan is now within sight and we are anticipating being able to adopt it early next year. This detailed and robust document will help us deliver the aspirations and housing needs of local people, as well as land for employment. It will also help protect our beautiful countryside from unwanted and inappropriate development.”

Or nearly the last word because how much of this plan will be EDDC’s and how much Inspector Thickett’s?

And whose Systems and whose Thinking!

Many people don’t know they live on flood plains

“Two million households do not realise they are living on flood plains – while chronic underinvestment and climate change are increasing the risks of serious flooding, Government advisers have warned. …

… About 12,000 planning applications to build up to nine properties each on flood plains did not receive specific advice from the EA in 2013 due to staffing cuts, the report finds.

As a result, more than 100,000 homes could have been built without proper oversight to ensure that they are safe, resilient and do not increase the risk of flooding elsewhere.

More than 800 jobs – 20 per cent of staff – have been lost in the Environment Agency (EA)’s flood risk management team since September 2010, with more than half of those in roles specifically tasked with avoiding floods, despite ministers’ pledges to protect frontline jobs, the CCC warns.
Key pieces of legislation designed to reduce the risk of floods by improving drainage from new properties have not been properly implemented, despite being recommended by the 2008 Pitt review into the floods the previous year, which left 13 people dead and 45,000 homes flooded.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/10955112/Two-million-households-do-not-realise-they-are-living-on-flood-plains.html

Ethical standards in public life

Owl would add some of the comments from this report, but its blood pressure can’t cope … well, ok, maybe just one:

“Question:
Evidence of internal control and accountability measures – what is the internal control environment for maintaining ethical behaviour and standards in the organisation?

Answer:
A suitable code of conduct – typically a series of Do’s and Don’ts, publicly available and adherence to the code monitored.

Identification of key indicators or measures of an ethical culture within the organisation and periodic reviews of their effectiveness.

Existence of and adherence to whistleblowing policy or speak up mechanisms, gifts and hospitality registers, anti-bribery and corruption, declarations of interests requirements, procedures for dealing with conflicts of interest, which are regularly reviewed.

Ethical risks captured and controlled in the risk management process and evidence they have been identified, assessed and where required mitigated.

Transparency and reporting arrangements which encourages “intelligent accountability” putting out good quality information in intelligible and adaptable formats creating a genuine dialogue with stakeholders.”

Click to access 6.1291_CO_LAL_Ethical_standards_of_public_life_report_Interactive__2_.pdf

Devon southern coast hot spot for people smuggling

Is that why we are not applying for coastal improvement grants!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/12047657/Devons-pirate-coastline-becomes-people-smugglers-new-target.html

Want to know about EDDC HQ move? Be a Heathpark tenant

image

It seems that tenants at Heathpark are going to be better informed about EDDC’s moving plans than the rest of us – including councillors, according to the front page of the View from Honiton today!

Devolution: Scrutiny 1, EDDC Leader and CEO own goal

As Owl has already hooted, the Tory Government, for ideological reasons, is very keen to devolve some power over public spending to new regional bodies.

Local authorities in Devon and Somerset- including EDDC- have responded enthusiastically setting up a consortium, the Heart of the South-West (HotSW) to bid for more power to spend central government money.

But critics believe that the Government wants to boost local productivity by letting rip construction, housebuilding, and manufacturing, and by encouraging the selling off of public assets to be more economically exploited by the “free market”. Farming, tourism, and renewable energy seem low priorities. Climate change and the environment seem hardly to figure as concerns.

The negotiations at HotSW involve a business organisation, the Local Enterprise Panel, (LEP) but it’s difficult to know exactly who calls the tune, because the meetings so far have been closed to press and public and no minutes are published. A draft bid is almost ready and is intended to be sent to Whitehall before Christmas.

EDDC representative on HotSW is Council Leader Paul Diviani, and, true to form, a recommendation was about to be slipped through for Cabinet approval, to give Cllr Diviani delegated authority to agree to whatever bid HotSW comes up with!

But thanks to the insistence of Chair of the Scrutiny Committee , Independent Cllr Roger Giles, the context of the recommendation was openly discussed first, at a special meeting (Combined Overview & Scrutiny) called in the nick of time, just hours before the Cabinet meeting last Wednesday (2nd Dec).

The meeting began with a presentation by EDDC Chief Officer Mark Williams, which confirmed that the thrust of HotSW was to boost the local economy by expanding construction, industry and commerce – productivity was too low, he said, because there were a lot of old people in the area! The new digital economy would benefit from better training and apprenticeships, especially “Greater Exeter” (including part of East Devon).

Councillors were sceptical. Tory Mike Allen said HotSW negotiations should be more transparent, and Independent Cllr Rob Longhurst followed up his idea, putting forward the motion that a group of councillors with appropriate responsibilities should be kept informed of developments and consulted before decisions were made.

This was accepted, and it was also proposed that no delegated authority should be given to the Leader until the Full Council Meeting on 16th December, by which time all councillors would be sent a copy of the bid.

A triumph for transparency? Not quite— the bid will still not be put in the public domain before it goes to Westminster.

EDW note: Two previous posts on the subject here https://eastdevonwatch.org/2015/12/03/devolution-eddc-ceo-asks-us-to-trust-him-and-diviani/

and here https://eastdevonwatch.org/2015/12/05/that-devolution-meeting-part-2-the-dark-gets-darker/

All I want for Christmas ….

Will Diviani and Williams go head-to-head on this one, or does Swire have it in the Santa sack already (presuming it isn’t too far beneath him)?

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Lordship-East-Devon-village-grabs/story-28312790-detail/story.html