Don’t like what the House of Lords says? Crush it:
What does East Devon District Council know? Not very much
… if you take all the unanswered and refused Freedom of Information requests on the whatdotheyknow website:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/east_devon_district_council
CPRE: “Food, Farming and the Countryside” event
Please note that attendance at this event requires pre-registration – details below:
Saturday, 21st November 2015
10.30am-2pm
at
Kentisbeare Village Hall, Cullompton, EX15 2AB
‘Food, Farming & The Countryside’
A CPRE Devon seminar & light lunch with our special guest speakers:
Neil Parish MP, Tiverton & Honiton
John Sheaves, CEO Taste of the West Andrew Butler, NFU Devon County Adviser
RSVP Rosemary Jessel, CPRE Devon Events Co-ordinator Tel:01409 241409 cpredevonevents@gmail.com
Kentisbeare Village Hall is just 3 miles from the M5 Junction 28 (Cullompton) exit.
Government trying to sneak through new fracking rules affecting National Parks, AONBs, SSSIs and World Heritage sites
“… The new regulations issued just weeks after the election say fracking would be allowed to take place below 1,200 metres in national parks, the broads, areas of outstanding natural beauty, world heritage sites and areas that are most vulnerable to groundwater pollution. To do this, fracking companies would have to drill down and sideways from outside protected areas. ”
SSSIs, conservation areas for wildlife and plants, would receive no protection under the regulations.
Underfunding community hospitals “threatens the whole system”
A cash crisis in the NHS is starving community hospitals and threatens to undermine the whole system, it has been warned.
Former health minister and Exeter MP Ben Bradshaw said failing to fund community health facilities, such as community hospitals, physiotherapy and community nursing, was short sighted.
He said it played a vital role in keeping patients out of major hospitals and blamed under-funding as the latest casualty of the sweeping reorganisation of the NHS undertaken by the Coalition Government.
His words come as the Prime Minister has been urged to step into the row over cottage hospital closures in North Devon.
Meanwhile, in Cornwall healthcare commissioners have been forced to search for new providers of community care after a private company ceded its contracted saying it simply could not deliver for the money being paid.
Mr Bradshaw said lack of funding underpinned the whole problem and things had to change.
“The underlying problem here is the serious financial crisis affecting the NHS, which has mainly been caused by the Government’s disastrous and costly re-organisation of the health service at the beginning of the last Parliament.
“The independent regulator, the Care Quality Commission, warned this week that a growing number of organisations are unable to guarantee safe care and Monitor, which oversees Foundation Trusts, said the NHS faces its worst crisis for more than 30 years.”
Earlier this month, Northern Devon Healthcare Trust (NDHT) voted to close in-patient beds at Ilfracombe and Bideford Hospitals, despite protests from their own senior medics and patients and warnings from healthcare commissioners. In the latest twist to the saga, Great Torrington Town Council has urged David Cameron to see for himself the unique problems faced by their community.
The council urged Mr Cameron to see for himself the challenges in rural areas which were being made worse by “insufficient funding.” …
Parking: £14.79 a day or £5 a day – you choose!
Potential car parkers in the Mill Street car park in Sidmouth had charges hiked by more than 300% to £5,400 per year so it’s not surprising that they did not take up spaces which worked out at more than £14.79 per day.
We now hear that DCC are offering landlords, contractors and business owners ( which, of course will include developers) will be able to park on double yellow lines for £5 per day = £1,825 for 365 days of parking.
Mill Street – £14.79 per day
Double yellow lines – £5 per day
Today, the Express and Echo says there will be few checks on the £5 per day charge – indeed without appropriate legislation to define each category it will be impossible to do it at all. A source is quoted as saying “It’s all about the money”.
Yet another example of EDDC plc and Devon County Council plc – grabbing what they can when they can build their luxury HQ (EDDC) or to plug their own party’s funding cut black holes (DCC).
Sheer madness or sheer greed – take your pick.
Transparency my ….
Interesting exchange of emails regarding the contract for Knowle between EDDC and Pegasus:
You can see why the Conservatives want to water down the Freedom of Information Act.
Park on double yellow lines in Devon for £5 per day – but only if you are a business owner, landlord or contractor
Did anyone else know about this? Is it a Stuart Hughes idea? If not, who? And why? And why hasn’t Stuart Hughes publicised it in a funny suit or video? And why can’t the rest of us avail ourselves of this useful perk? Imagine how much it would save in parking fees.
“Permits allowing drivers to park on double yellow lines for just £5 a day have been made available in Devon. The scheme is open to business owners, landlords and contractors”.
Cranbrook ” infrastructure”
Roads in Cranbrook are not yet ” adopted” by DCC and EDDC. Police cannot therefore enforce parking or speed restrictions:
“There are concerns that some councils are failing to use powers available under highways regulations, which require builders to complete works.
Councils can ask builders to sign a Section 38 Agreement, under the Highways Act 1980, to ensure that the roads are built to an acceptable standard and will eventually be adopted. They are backed with a bond to cover the cost of the work in case it is not completed, or the builder goes out of business.
… “Councils can serve a notice, called a Section 220 notice, which gives them the power to prosecute a developer if the work is not guaranteed, but the fine limit is set at £1,000.
“Unfortunately, the level of the fine is only a small deterrent when compared to the value of a housing site,” said a St Helens Council spokesman.
Jim Codd of The Resident Adoption Action Group supports homeowners in this situation. He says he is aware of around 100 roads across England and Wales where work has been left incomplete and says there may be many more out there.
“There are problems all over the country,” he told the programme.
“But as it stands there is no legislation to force developers to get new roads adopted by the council.”
Even where these agreements are signed, residents have to rely on a council enforcing them when work is left unfinished. “
Perhaps councillors would like to check whether EDDC has entered into such agreements in Cranbrook and elsewhere and, if so, what it is doing to enforce them.
Conservatives are failing young people and favouring pensioners leading Tory tells David Cameron
“The government stands accused by a leading Tory thinker of creating a “country for older generations” in which pensioners benefit from constantly rising incomes while the young, their families and children pay the price of punishing policy decisions, including cuts to their tax credits.
In a hard-hitting intervention on the eve of what is expected to be a tempestuous House of Lords debate over plans to slash the incomes of millions of low-income families, former Conservative minister and prominent party intellectual David Willetts says the current policy mix is manifestly unfair and breaks the supposed “social contract” between generations. …”
This is the latest of several articles with a similar theme recently which seems to hint that some, or all, universal pensioner benefits (bus passes, winter heating allowance, free TV licences for over-75s, protected state pension increases) may be for the chop.
Council “hubs” and austerity cuts
Remember EDDC promised that if it moved to Honiton, it would have “hubs” in major towns: didn’t work for Mid Devon:
Exmouth seafront trader sad about “regeneration” plans
“Earlier in the year it was announced that Exmouth seafront, where the café is situated, would be undergoing an £18m redevelopment. It is still unclear how long the Harbour View Café will continue trading.
Dawn said for 18 months the existing traders were excited about the redevelopment, until it became increasingly clear they wouldn’t be a part of it.
“I was absolutely gutted when I realised we were surplus to requirements,” she said.
“We suddenly realised that our time might be running out down there and for myself, I’ve spent my whole working life down there, I still don’t know what I’ll do next. I feel lost at the thought of losing it. We’re living on a day by day, hand to mouth situation until we know more. We say to our customers we are still here. The doors are still open at the moment. Whilst we are still here there is hope.”
South-west gets its first ” million pound towns”
Register to vote online
If you have not registered to vote, it can be done quickly and easily online. If you do not register to vote by 1 December 2015 you will not be able to vote in any by-elections elections or in May 2016 when some council seats in parts of the country are up for election.
The effects of a 40% cut in local authority spending
40 percent funding reduction would devastate local services and communities, councils warn
LGA media release 19 October 2015
“A further 40 per cent real terms reduction in local government grant funding in the Spending Review would deliver the £10.5 billion knock-out blow to cherished local services, the Local Government Association warns today.
Non-protected government departments have been ordered to draw up savings plans worth, in real terms, 25 and 40 per cent of their budgets ahead of the Spending Review on November 25, which will set out government spending plans for the next four years.
Analysis by the LGA, which represents more than 370 councils in England and Wales, reveals a 40 per cent real terms reduction to core central government funding would be worth £8.4 billion. The same cut to separate local government grants would see a further £2.1 billion lost from council budgets.
This would mean local government losing 64 per cent of its grant funding between 2010 and 2020.
In its Spending Review submission to the Treasury, the LGA has already predicted councils will face almost £10 billion in separate cost pressures, through government policies, inflation and demand, by 2020 even before another penny is taken out of council budgets.
Together with another 40 per cent reduction to funding from central government, this would leave councils facing £20 billion in funding cuts and increased cost pressures by the end of the decade. Local government leaders say this would devastate local services and communities.
To put those figures into context, annual council spending on individual services in 2013/14 include:
Bin collection and recycling – £3.3 billion;
Arts and leisure (libraries, leisure centres, museums) – £2 billion
Road maintenance – £1.3 billion;
Subsidised bus services and free travel for elderly and disabled – £1.7 billion
Street cleaning – £717 million;
Parks maintenance – £690 million;
Street lighting – £530 million
Trading standards, noise, environmental health – £480 million.
The LGA said even if councils stopped providing all of these vital services for their residents, it would still not be nearly enough to plug the potential £20 billion hole in their finances by the end of the decade.
Lord Porter, LGA Chairman, said:
“Councils are under no illusions about the challenge that lies ahead. We know we face almost £10 billion in cost pressures by 2020 even before the prospect of further challenging funding reductions over the next four years.
“What is clear is that another 40 per cent real terms reduction to local government grant funding on top of these cannot be an option on November 25.
“It is a false economy to reduce funding to local government while attempting to prop up other departments.
“Providing councils with fairer funding is the only way to avoid the unintended consequence of other parts of the public sector, such as the NHS, being left to pick up the financial pieces. When making its spending decisions government must consider the huge pressure funding reductions to councils would have not just on vital local services but on the public sector more widely.
“Councils have worked tirelessly to shield residents from the impact of the 40 per cent government funding reductions they have been handed since 2010. However, the resilience of local government services cannot be stretched much further.
“It would be our residents who would suffer as councils are no longer able to deliver some of their statutory duties, like street cleaning and providing the free bus travel that is a lifeline to our elderly and disabled.
“Closing every children’s centre in England would save £700 million but this would only be enough to plug the funding gap facing adult social care for one year. Councils could stop fixing the two million potholes they fill each year to save £600 million by 2020, but this would still not be enough to keep providing free bus travel to elderly and disabled residents.
“These are the difficult decisions councils will be forced to face. Many of the things people take for granted, like clean and well-lit streets, maintained parks and access to leisure centres, will become a thing of the past as a result.”
Additional information
Breakdown of local government core spending (figures in £000s and exclude expenditure on schools and housing benefit).
2013/14
Education
£4,249,676
Highways
£1,591,039
Public Transport
£1,850,344
Children’s Social Care
£6,914,607
Adult Social Care
£14,565,464
Housing
£2,003,473
Cultural Services
£2,708,616
Waste Management
£3,324,260
Other Environmental Services
£798,707
Regulatory Services
£888,334
Planning and Development
£1,262,183
Central services
£2,618,551
All other services, capital financing and other costs
£4,693,501
Public Health
£2,507,832
Total net expenditure
£49,976,587″
Lords asked to block Conservative plans to disenfranchise up to 1.9 million voters
Tory plans to wipe 1.9m names off the electoral register are set to be blocked by a House of Lords revolt, following advice from Britain’s voting watchdog. Liberal Democrat and Labour peers are poised to vote to halt Government plans to slash the electoral roll ahead of next May’s elections for local councils, the Scottish Parliament and London Mayor.
Despite warnings from the Electoral Commission about the dangers of disenfranchising legitimate voters, ministers believe many of the names are bogus and have speeded up by 12 months plans to “modernise” the system with individual registration. The independent watchdog has now issued a briefing note urging peers to vote against the Government next Tuesday, in what will be the second crunch clash between the Commons and the Lords, after the row over tax credits cuts.
The note, seen by The HuffPost UK, states that acting before the outcome of its annual canvass of voters before the outcome of “means the Government has acted without reliable information on how many redundant entries will be removed at the end of this year and how many eligible electors will need to re-register ahead of May 2016.”
“Taking into account…the scale and importance of the polls scheduled for next May, we continue to recommend that the end of transition should take place in December 2016 as currently specified in legislation” It concludes: “We therefore recommend that Parliament does not approve this order.”
HuffPost UK understands that both Labour and the Lib Dems will order a three-line whip to ‘annul’ the Tory statutory instrument on the changes – and with an in-built anti-Tory majority they are set to win the day.
Labour’s Lord Kennedy has today tabled an amendment to Lib Dem peer Lord Tyler’s motion to annul the legislation, “on the grounds that it goes against the advice of the Electoral Commission”. In his Labour conference speech last month Jeremy Corbyn warned: “We know why the Tories are doing it. They want to gerrymander next year’s Mayoral election in London by denying hundreds of thousands of Londoners their right to vote.”
The new Individual Electoral Registration (IER) process will particularly affect those in rented accommodation and urban areas, who are less likely to register, and students, because universities and colleges no longer ‘block register’ students living in halls of residence.
Campaign groups have complained that in areas such as Hackney in London, one in four voters could lose their rights to be on the electoral roll. But writing for Huff Post UK, Cabinet Office minister John Penrose said that the changes would bring Britain into line with ‘every other serious democracy in the world’.
In its briefing note, the Electoral Commission makes clear that it would be wiser to stick to original plans to complete the reforms by December 2016 rather than December 2015. “The earlier timetable puts the greater onus on electors as they will need to take action in order to ensure they are able to remain registered and participate in the May 2016 polls,” it says.”By contrast, the later timetable puts the greater responsibility on EROs (Electoral Registration Officers) to identify and take steps to remove redundant or inaccurate entries.”
Ministers usually accept the advice of the independent watchdog and in September decided to fully adopt its recommendations to change the question in the EU referendum.
Source: Huffington Post UK online, today
Exmouth Save our Seafront Spotlight item
The protest at Full Council by Save Our Seafront campaigners, was aired on Spotlight tv yesterday, on the morning and the evening news.
See:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b06j6pdv/spotlight-22102015
from 12:45-12:53.
How developers should smooch local authorities
A couple of solicitors writing on the “Local Government Lawyer” website give advice to developers on how to get the best out of their dealings with local authorities. Here are a couple of paragraphs of their article:
“… Huge cuts in public sector funding means that councils are looking to engage ever more in property development to generate place-shaping, capital receipts or longer term income streams. If developers know how to engage properly with councils, understand what makes them tick and talk the right language then great (and profitable) things can be achieved. Conversely, far too many developers shoot themselves in the foot both reputationally and financially and miss out on deals with the public sector because they just don’t know how to put it together. …
… Councils are a lot more innovative and willing to explore collaborative arrangements with developers than developers often realise. Not every council is going to have the right approach and, indeed, councils need to improve and continue to develop their own commerciality and freedom of thought. For the most part, however, in our experience they are open to listening to and engaging with developers who have something different say and an attitude which chimes with that of the council. Whether it is at the soft market testing stage or during the procurement it is worth exploring the options. …”
Devon one of worst places to live for quality of life
Worst places to live:
Bradford
Kingston Upon Hull
North of Northern Ireland
Eilean Siar (Western Isles)
West & South of Northern Ireland
Blackpool
Devon
Central Valleys
East of Northern Ireland
South Teesside
Devon came in at 132 out of 138, a drop of 46 places from last year.
“The uSwitch.com study assessed 138 local areas (NUTS3 regions) for 26 factors such as salaries, disposable household income, and the cost of essential goods including food bills, fuel costs and energy bills. The study also factored in lifestyle issues like hours of sunshine, working hours and life expectancy to ensure a full picture of the quality of life in each NUTS3 region.”
In East Devon they try to grab beach huts, in Huddersfield it’s gardens
Residents 0, Developers 1. Better hope EDDC doesn’t own anyone’s garden.
“It’s taken decades of toil and thousands of pounds to turn these gardens into pristine suburban oases. But there’ll be digging of a different kind soon – when developers send in the demolition squads.”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3285446/The-council-s-trying-steal-gardens.html