National Auditor General highly critical of public service cuts

” … The NAO boss, who reports directly to Parliament rather than the Government, pointed to cuts to local authority budgets which had resulted in a reduction in money available for social care, with knock-on effects on the NHS.

“Now if you’re going to go through much deeper, more profound organisational cuts . . . you need to understand what you’re doing better than that,” he said.

Whitehall civil servants had “a responsibility to be much better informed at the centre” about the impact of reforms, rather than leaving local government to deal with the fallout, he said.”

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Impact-Government-cuts-understood/story-26185842-detail/story.html

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Impact-Government-cuts-understood/story-26185842-detail/story.html

Can EDDC be serious, with revised Local Plan?

One example here: http://saveoursidmouth.com/2015/03/16/what-eddcs-revised-local-plan-specifies-for-the-sid-valley/

Who REALLY decided on Knowle relocation?

We have all assumed that the (wholly Conservative) EDDC Cabinet was involved after all, that is what they are for. But there is an intriguing sentence in (Cabinet Member) Ian Thomas’s critique of the project on his website:

” … Recognising that the relocation project has been in the stewardship of the Executive Group of just four senior Members since 2013, I proposed to Cabinet remaining Members should be invited to inspect the underlying model, figures and assumptions, in an informal session in advance of a final decision to be made by Full Council on the 25th March, to ensure that the best possible decision is reached.”

http://www.trinitymatters.co.uk/index.php/eddc-east-devon/item/1078-a-new-future-for-the-knowle-eddc-cabinet-resolves-to-leave-sidmouth

Now, Councillor Thomas is a Cabinet member and his responsibilities are listed as:

Economy Portfolio Holder
Asset management forum
Budget working party
Capital Strategy and Allocation Group

Joint bodies:
Seaton regeneration programme board (Chairman)

Representative on outside bodies:
Exeter Science Park – board (Director)
Exeter University Innovation Centre Board

Now, if someone as senior as this says he was excluded fron discussions and decision-making on this multi-million pound spend, what does this say about the Cabinet style of managing the district? It appears that there is an “Inner Cabinet” of only four Conservative councillors which excludes not just backbench councillors but also other cabinet members, including the Economic Portfolio Holder, from its secret discussions.

This is obviously an urgent matter for the Overview and Scrutiny Committee. Which begs the question: how can they be a check and balance on the Cabinet when the Cabinet is so flawed?

Cranbrook: rail station will not open soon due to “unforeseen delays”

No news of exactly what these “unforeseen delays” are or when the station will open, leaving many people who anticipated commuting by rail from the town relying on their cars. There are already severe parking problems in the town.

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Cranbrook-Station-faces-delays/story-26176689-detail/story.html

More East Devon AONB under threat

Just heard from an EDWatcher, who says: “Did you know that Clinton Devon Estates are applying for 22 houses in East Budleigh AONB…? 14/2959/MOUT ”

Missing voters being urged to register

” … A drive to recapture the nearly one million voters who went missing from the electoral roll in 2013 starts today. A £2.4m advertising campaign, featuring secretly-shot footage of members of the public flipping out when deprived of basics such as tomato ketchup or the use of a lift, has been designed to make it clear that, unless people sign up by 20 April, they will not be able to vote 17 days later.

It seems like a mad dash. Research carried out last year showed that a quarter of 18 and 19-year-olds, and the same proportion of black people, were unregistered. Last month, the Commission reported that there were 920,000 fewer people on the register in December than expected, mainly students and those who have moved house and failed to register.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jenny-watson-chair-of-the-electoral-commission-the-idea-of-marking-an-x-in-a-box-probably-seems-completely-alien-10109799.html

Well, we know where at least 6,000 of them were – here in East Devon!

EDDC Revised Plan- directly affects CLYST ST MARY

Gaeron Kayley, leading the Save Clyst St Mary campaign, urges you to read his message:

There has been a significant development regarding the Clyst St Mary planning applications of which you need to be aware.

We have been advised that East Devon District Council, in its amended Local Plan, has now stated that our village is to take an additional 200 new homes (on top of the 95 that we have already agreed to.) Moreover, the Friends Provident and Plymouth Brethren sites are the proposed locations of these new homes.

It is important to note that this news concerns East Devon’s Local Plan – it is not a result of the specific hearings for which we have all battled so hard to object to (these planning applications are still to be heard). This announcement is part of a totally separate decision where, for reasons we are not party to, our village seems to have become the exception to the apparent aim of preserving East Devon villages’ identity; it is believed it is due to our ‘proximity to Exeter’.

As you can imagine, having devoted a large part of our spare time to this campaign for several months, we feel, as you probably do, utterly devastated to hear this shocking news. There remain many questions unanswered and we would, in the longer term, be keen to hear your views regarding the group’s response and possible actions. In the first instance, we desperately need speakers at the meeting at the Council’s headquarters on Monday 23rd March at 10am. It is crucial our voice is heard. Would you be prepared to speak? If so, please respond to this email – or call 01392 969100 – as soon as possible. Anyone that is prepared to speak must have a booking made by mid day with EDDC. We are hoping to arrange a short get together for anyone prepared to speak on Tuesday evening.

To say that we are shocked at this development is an understatement; now, more than ever, we have to stay strong and united as a group and really hope that, despite how recent events appear to have manifested themselves, ultimately justice, transparency and equality shall still prevail.

Gaeron

Relevant links:

The agenda for the Special Development Management Committee to be held on Monday, 23 March at 10amcan now be viewed at: http://eastdevon.gov.uk/media/990985/230315-special-combined-dmc-agenda.pdf

The revised draft New East Devon Local Plan can be viewed here: http://eastdevon.gov.uk/media/990979/230315-sp-dmc-local-plan-with-changes-for-post-hearing-consultation-ver-04-march-2015.pdf

The draft schedule of proposed changes to the East Devon Local Plan can be viewed here:http://eastdevon.gov.uk/media/990982/230315-sp-dmc-table-of-changes-to-local-plan-v3-march-15.pdf

Paper copies of the agenda, revised draft Local Plan and schedule of proposed changes have been posted to those committee members that would normally receive a paper copy of the DMC agenda.

Quart into a pint pot at Growth Point/Cranbrook?

“… The Exeter and East Devon Growth Point is a long term partnership for growth between the public sector – including East Devon District, Exeter City and Devon County councils – and private sectors which was established in 2007. The vision is to build sustainable communities with the aim of providing skilled employment opportunities for residents close to where they live.

In total the £1bn growth programme is expected to deliver around 20,000 new homes and more than 25,000 jobs across the Growth Point area over the next 15 to 20 years.”

So, if East Devon is to build 1,000 houses a year does this mean all of them will be in the “growth area”?

Read more: http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Work-starts-main-road-210million-Skypark/story-26175539-detail/story.html

Lack of affordable housing sends benefit bills soaring

http://guardian.newspaperdirect.com/epaper/iphone/homepage.aspx#_article231dbd90-8a8a-4526-a4a6-c81357c9e996

Tory Cabinet member has a number of reservations about Knowle relocation costs

Councillor Ian Thomas states on his blog:

… Cabinet has resolved that EDDC should leave its aging premises at The Knowle in Sidmouth, for a new much smaller purpose built office in Honiton and refurbished Exmouth Town Hall. A move, I understand originally mooted in 2008 and more actively pursued since 2011, has taken a large step forward.

Tonight this was overwhelmingly supported by a joint meeting of the Overview & Scrutiny and Audit & Governance Committees

A final decision will now be made by Full Council on 25th March.

Knowle Update

Pegasus Life has been appointed as preferred developer for The Knowle at an offer price between £7M and £8M, they are looking to providing a residential development of retirement and extra care facilities.

Not all of the Knowle site is to be sold, only the existing built area of 1.1ha and a further 0.8ha around the current buildings. This will leave the remaining area of over 3.5ha available for transfer to Sidmouth Town Council, to be managed as parkland.

Finances

A detailed analysis, professionally audited and assessed, concluded that all options to leave The Knowle are better than staying. The most cost effective, twin Honiton and Exmouth sites.

A budget of £2.2M representing the capital costs, less the capital receipts, was agreed to build the new accommodation and refurbish the existing Town Hall in Exmouth.

Moving from The Knowle is expected to save the council £6M over 20 years. It will also move council jobs from Sidmouth to Honiton and Exmouth, with the economic effect of the council’s activities retained within East Devon.

Sidmouth will share in the economic benefit of the project, through construction of the Pegasus development and activity of subsequent residents, Honiton and Exmouth from new offices and refurbishment.

Risk

Short term borrowing will be required prior to receipt of proceeds from sale of the Knowle site.

Initially £9.2M, with an additional estimated interest of £0.3m. This represents a potential risk, in that if the council borrows this sum, but planning permission is not secured by Pegasus Life, then the sale of The Knowle would not progress or the Council potentially be left with large borrowing and a redundant Knowle site.

I was assured this risk would be minimised, in that no such short term borrowing would be entered into before a full, unconditional, contract between EDDC and Pegasus Life.

Once repayment of the short term loan has been completed, the Council will be left with a fixed interest loan of £2.1M over 20 years, which would attract interest of £0.6M.

Residual values

In the debate, I questioned how ‘residual values’ have been considered.

Using the construction estimate of £2,439/m2, and a building size of 2,776m2, overall construction costs at Honiton are expected to be £6.77M. However, the market value of the resulting premises is estimated to be only £3.25M. From an investment point of view, this indicates that there is an immediate deficit on the project, of £3.52M.

The senior financial officer explained ‘residual value’ had not been considered as part of the evaluation, as the project seeks to provide accommodation for the council to complete its own business, rather than as an investment.

A personal conclusion…

There is no doubt in my mind that current facilities at The Knowle are unsuitable to provide appropriate modern office accommodation for the authority over the next 20 years, as it remains essentially an aging converted hotel.

Considering the District with ‘fresh eyes’, there is clear logic in locating our main facilities in Honiton (geographic centre of the area) and Exmouth, as the main population centre.

Whilst the financial case in investment terms is not overly compelling, as a means of providing the appropriate accommodation in the right locations at a sensible cost, the proposed solution is attractive when compared to staying at The Knowle.

Papers presented to Cabinet and other Members recently are complex and extensive. Recognising that the relocation project has been in the stewardship of the Executive Group of just four senior Members since 2013, I proposed to Cabinet remaining Members should be invited to inspect the underlying model, figures and assumptions, in an informal session in advance of a final decision to be made by Full Council on the 25th March, to ensure that the best possible decision is reached.

I do hope that this invitation is taken up.

http://www.trinitymatters.co.uk/index.php/eddc-east-devon/item/1078-a-new-future-for-the-knowle-eddc-cabinet-resolves-to-leave-sidmouth

note: apparently, his Leader was rather irritated by his probing questions (see post below)

Housing construction figures fall

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/mar/13/decline-uk-housebuilding-drop-off-construction-ons-output-mortgage-approvals

Last night’s hustings

Organised by Federation of Small Businesses, at Sidmouth’s Kennaway House, appears not to have been too well organised. Public were supposed to have been excluded, then apparently there was a change of mind to include them and then a change back to no public. Irritated UKIP members invaded en bloc and the chairman (who seemed unsure where “Knowle” was) seems not to have understood his role.

Not a good start, though we hear Claire Wright was in very good form and Hugo Swire made some very strange remarks (possibly from a very large briefing folder he brought with him).

No doubt UKIP will blame the EU for the way the evening went.

Cautions for Councillors voting on relocation

From SOS: http://saveoursidmouth.com/2015/03/13/auditors-reports-highly-dependent-on-quality-and-sufficiency-of-data-used/

Incursion into Knowle’s Public Open Space “has never been debated by councillors”

and from more than one senior Honiton Councillor, at various stages of EDDC’s ill-starred (jinxed?) ‘road to relocation’ project. Remember this SIN post, anyone? https://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2014/02/17/watchdog-kennelled/

Knowle: another question

How come, if a buyer for Knowle (Pegasus Life) was only recently chosen, all the paperwork is ready to sign, seal and deliver before the end of March?

No final decision had been made on 22 January 2015:

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/committees-and-meetings/overview-and-scrutiny-committee/minutes/22-january-2015/office-relocation-update/

The successful bidder was announced on 4 March 2015:
http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/mystery_knowle_bidder_revealed_1_3978943

and within 3 weeks all will be signed and sealed.

3 weeks to flog Knowle, 4 plus years and counting to get a Local Plan and it’s still outstanding business – no special meetings, few extra resources.

Says a lot about how these resources are prioritised and where the money goes on all those (uncounted and unaccountable) officer hours.

Who scrutinises the scrutinisers scrutinising the scrutinisers?

The “Centre for Public Scrutiny” set up a National Overview and Scrutiny Forum:

A National Overview and Scrutiny Forum was set up in 2007 to help develop Overview and Scrutiny in England and Wales. Each English region sends one officer representative, and one councillor representative, to the Forum. Wales sends one officer and one councillor representative as well.

The Forum is convened and facilitated by the Centre for Public Scrutiny but controls its own work programme and is driven by the needs and interests of O&S practitioners.”

So how effective has this Forum(remember, made up of councillors and officers) been in the run- up to local and general elections?

At its meeting in April 2014, the Forum decided that it would take a break from meetings in person until after the 2015 General Election.

Now, why would officers and councillors shut down a forum on overview and scrutiny 10 months before elections?

Wow, I would love to see the minutes of THAT meeting! So I click on the link for them:
http://www.cfps.org.uk/nosf-minutes-agenda

Whoops, nothing since 2013 but no fears there is a link from this archive page:

http://www.cfps.org.uk/?location_id=363

which takes you back to the earlier page in a loop where you start again … and again! This is SO like EDDC!

However, a note at the bottom says to call someone in the organisation. No reply.

Request for the minutes has now been made by email.

Transparency? Hmmm!

EDDC masterclass on how not to answer questions!

Questions:

How long has the current monitoring officer been in post?
Was the monitoring officer vacancy advertised prior to the current monitoring officer taking up the post, and if so where was it advertised? What are the monitoring officer’s qualifications?

Answer:

The post is currently a shared post with South Somerset District Ccouncil and this person is a qualified local government solicitor

Question:

In the last five years (February 2010 to February 2015) how many permanent vacancies have arisen?
How many of these have been advertised?
How many have been advertised on your website?
How many of these vacancies have not been advertised at all and on whose authority (job title)?

Answer:
This information is not tracked.

Source:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/transparency_5#incoming-626302

Knowle Public consultations, EDDC-style

An early example of EDDC’s valiant effort to engage the public was flagged up on the SIN blog  https://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2012/10/31/spot-the-knowle-consultation/

Click here for news of the most recent one :  http://saveoursidmouth.com/2015/03/13/public-consultation-was-limited-to-two-ads-in-the-sidmouth-herald-admits-eddc-legal-officer/

 

Has EDDC already designed its new HQ?

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/246652/response/615352/attach/html/4/Doc%202%20office%20re%20location%20comparative%20study.pdf.html

in answer to request:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/cost_and_value_of_proposed_headq#incoming-615352

Even Pope Francis wants election transparency!

Speaking in Argentina, he said that:

“Because many interests come into play in financing of an election campaign and then they ask you to pay back, so, the election campaign should be independent of anyone who may finance it.”

He went on to say:

“Many interests get into the mix, and then they send you the bill.  Perhaps public financing would allow for me, the citizen, to know that I’m financing each candidate with a given amount of money”.

Everything, according to the Pope, “needs to be transparent and clean.”