“East Devon car parking machines have taken more than £32,000 as a result of not giving change”

“Statistics released by a Freedom of Information request showed East Devon District Council introduced a new system which meant drivers overpaid an extra £16,946 in 2014/15 and £15,066 in 2015/16.

While, in 2013/14, there were no overpayments as ticket machines were programmed to give the appropriate time for the money inserted.

In the last three financial years, the council has made more than £3,100,000 per year in car parking revenue in Exmouth, Sidmouth, Honiton, Axminster, Budleigh Salterton, Beer, Seaton, Colyton, Lympstone and Ottery St Mary. …

… council spokeswoman said introducing the parking permits had meant customers could not buy parking time in 10p increments because there was not enough memory available in the current machines, so they introduced 50p increments.

This was because the number of ticket prices, which would be a new price point for every six minutes, to allow 10p increments, would be too much to continue alongside the new permit options.

To compromise, they introduced 50p increments on the same tariff, meaning customers would need to purchase parking in 30-minute periods rather than the previous six-minute increments – the minimum payment of 50p did not change. …”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/east_devon_parking_machines_take_32k_in_change_1_4689391

Well, maybe that will pay for a CEO’s platinum tea service and a Leader’s Gold ipad case.

Renewed interest in petition to cease schools monitoring service by Babcock

In May 2016 East Devon Watch reported on a 38 Degrees petition which sought to remove the armament manufacturer Babcock from a contract to monitor attendance in Devon schools:

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2016/05/18/why-is-babcock-the-arms-manufacturer-involved-in-monitoring-school-attendance-in-devon/

The post has been re-read many times in the last few days and the petition has begun to gain more signatures again, which gives the impression that there is perhaps a new disquiet about the 7 year contract.

The £125 million contract was described thus by the company:

https://www.babcockinternational.com/News/Babcock%20awarded%20Devon%20schools%20contract

The 38 Degrees petition:

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/devon-county-council-get-weapons-manufacturers-out-of-education

made the following claim:

Babcock International is a weapon manufacturer operating around the globe. They are also contracted by Devon County Council to monitor and produce reports on school attendance.

After ten sessions (five days) of “unauthorised absence” they send this letter threatening a fine of up to £2500 and/or three months in prison.
The letter is sent to hundreds of parents each year, causing disproportionate distress for what, in many cases, is a single case of illness or forgetting to inform the school in time.

Children become worried that their mum or dad might go to prison. Parents worry their children might be taken into care, that they might lose their jobs, businesses, dignity and freedom.

The threat, and potential fine and imprisonment, disproportionately affects single parents and poor people, who are less able to pay a Fixed Penalty Notice within 21 days (after which it doubles).

I have personally supported a single mum who was working full time, raising two children, starting a business and having to comfort her children who thought that Mum was going to prison.

Babcock’s business is in fear, not in children’s education.”

The petition currently stands at nearly 800 signatures.

David Cameron has resigned because he can’t operate as a back bench MP …

…. so is Hugo Swire going to emulate him?

Surely East Devon is now much too small for his big … brain?

Opening hotels, judging dog shows, eating canapes with councillors, having tea with pensioners … just not what you are used to … especially when it’s not in Mauritius, which SO misses you.

The world needs you Hugo. We would do our best to manage without you.

Crowdfunding for high court case on third party objection to inspector planning consents

“A Lewisham resident is seeking to crowd fund a case concerning whether those affected by a planning inspector’s decision may challenge it without a full High Court action.

Louise Venn has raised £5,432 towards her £30,000 target, with 49 days to go.

In an explanation of her decision to launch the initiative, Ms Venn said: “The UK is completely ignoring basic minimum standards of environmental justice under European law. It is actively preventing the public from being able to challenge illegal and environmentally damaging decisions by its own national planning inspectors.”

Her concerns centre on applications that have been rejected by a local planning authority but permitted by an inspector on appeal. “The only way to correct [this] is through a High Court case against the secretary of state,” she said.

“This is almost impossible, as I discovered, because you become liable to pay the other side’s legal costs as soon as you bring a case. These costs generally run into tens of thousands of pounds.”

Ms Venn claimed this meant inspectors could act with impunity knowing only the wealthy could challenge them.

Her lawyer, Dr Paul Stookes of Richard Buxton Environmental and Planning Law, said: “The Government admitted to the Court of Appeal in 2014 that it had intentionally left a loophole in the law, preventing challenges to its own Planning Inspectors (but allowing such challenges to local planning decisions). In Venn v Secretary of State [2014] the Court of Appeal held that the claim fell within the scope of the Aarhus Convention, and ruled the UK was non-compliant with the Convention. But because the government had left the loophole intentionally, the Court did not intervene.

“Some two years on and the problem still persists. Added to this, the United Nations Aarhus Compliance Committee has repeatedly found that the UK is non-compliant with its international obligations – something the government simply ignores.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=28318%3Aclaimant-crowd-funds-action-over-appeals-against-decisions-of-planning-inspectors&catid=63&Itemid=31

Voluntary sector demands to be involved in devolution bids

Dream on people – you are seen as a cost not a benefit or asset to our “growth led” devolution bid.

“A group of more than 30 voluntary sector leaders has set out a statement of principles for devolution across England that includes a call for greater involvement of voluntary organisations in local decision-making.

At a summit held in London on 7 September, the group set out steps that should be taken to put people at the heart of devolution in England.

Among the 16 points – covering voice and advocacy, financing devolution, and public service reform – was a call for an agreement between devolved authorities, elected officials and the voluntary sector around the design, commissioning, funding and delivery of public services.

Under the government’s devolution programme, combined authorities have reached a series of deals with Whitehall that will see them take on more powers over services including transport, planning and skills. These deals are in place in Greater Manchester, Sheffield, Birmingham and Liverpool and the Tees Valley, although a deal for the North East Combined Authority was rejected by four of the seven councils involved last week.

At the Devolution and the Voluntary Sector Summit, leaders said devolved areas must be given the time and resources to create new democratic methods. The summit was convened by Charity Finance Group, Children England, Locality and the National Association for Voluntary and Community Action.

These new methods should not be tied to pre-existing structures and processes. There also needed to be a commitment to local and specialist voluntary organisations to help engage people and communities in devolved decisions. Of particular focus in this endeavour should be disadvantaged and disenfranchised groups.

The group expressed the view that no financial settlement should be agreed with an area until there had been an opportunity to map and assess the local needs and resources (including voluntary and private sector assets). Ahead of the government’s implementation of full business rates localisation, the summit also called on ministers to develop a method of distributing resources post-devolution that ensured that inequalities were not locked in.

The statement called for devolution to be based on the principle of subsidiary, as well as highlighting the need for an agreement between devolved authorities, elected officials and the voluntary sector about the design, commissioning, funding and delivery of public services.

Services should be commissioned on the basis of long term social outcomes rather than short term financial pressures, the group stated. Meanwhile, central government must articulate at the beginning of the process how it is accountable for services that will be devolved.

Caron Bradshaw, chief executive of Charity Finance Group, said the vision for devolution could reset the high-profile devolution drive with full involvement of the voluntary sector as an active partner to support communities.

Locality chief executive Tony Armstrong added: “There is a clear opportunity for devolution to harness the capacity and ideas of local people and organisations to transform their communities. But there is a risk that the devolution agenda is missing this potential.

“The devolution summit has been an important moment for us to come together as a sector, and think about what good devolution looks like and the principles that are essential for making this happen.”

One planning law for EDDC, another for the rest of us …

If an ordinary citizen started building work before receiving planning permission, they would be stopped. Not our council. As it decides for itself about Knowle, it is safe to say that they are confident they will grant themselves permission whatever:

East Devon District Council (EDDC) is carrying out the work, expected to take around 38 weeks to complete, as it prepares to relocate some of its offices to the town hall from Knowle, Sidmouth. [Do these works would need planning permission?]

The town council will be moving to 44 Rolle Street, from where it will continue to provide its usual services. [Does this building work need change of use?]

The council’s telephone and email contact details will remain unchanged.

The council of voluntary service will be moving to Ground Floor, Unit 15, Dinan Way, with its telephone and email contact details also remaining unchanged.

The Devon Registration Service will then leave the town hall on November 26, moving to Larkbeare House, Topsham Road, Exeter, with its telephone number also unchanged.

The town hall will remain open while the work takes place to allow EDDC to offer its housing needs, council tax and housing benefits services, which will be available between 9am and 4.30pm, Monday to Friday.

Citizens Advice will also continue to operate a drop-in service from the town hall, between 10am and 12.30pm and between 1.30pm and 3.30pm, Monday to Friday.”

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/council_and_services_to_move_as_town_hall_work_set_to_begin_1_4692835

Exmouth “regeneration”

Just wanted to share these photos with you. They were found on the fencing of Jungle Fun’s premises about lunch time today.

The messages on these banners are pretty clear. I’d say a resident/some residents are behind this who feel completely ignored and devalued by East Devon District Council, and who also want to share their support and solidarity with the owner and staff of Jungle Fun/Crazy Golf, during this truly heartbreaking time.”

A small selection of the 22 photographs – all available to anyone to share.

imageimage

image

image

image

Continue reading

Fast broadband for Blackdown Hills but not other parts of rural East Devon

From a correspondent:

Come to the Blackdown Hills in East Devon, Taunton Deane and Mid Devon where Gigaclear are bringing ultrafast broadband (Up to 1,000Mbps up as well as 1,000Mbps down) to 2,000 properties without a penny of public money. Villages in the area will become the first “Gigabit Villages” west of Bristol – better than any broadband service available in Exeter or Plymouth.”

See https://sites.google.com/site/upotterywebsite/broadband-1

More rural broadband – for Dorset

DOZENS more communities in Dorset are to benefit from the roll-out of superfast broadband.

More than 26 per cent of customers in the Superfast Dorset area have already chosen to take-up the service, triggering a “Gainshare” award under the terms of the contract with BT to be used to further extend the fibre roll-out.

More than 800 premises in 31 areas have just been added to the Superfast Dorset roll-out plans for next year as a result of the high take up and efficiencies in delivery, which together are worth more than £1million. …”

Rural locations to benefit from superfast broadband

East Devon chose not to join a consortium to bring broadband to its rural areas, preferring to go it alone. It was turned down for grants because its bid duplicated the consortium bid.

If you are unhappy about this state of affairs, contact EDDC councillor Phil Twiss, the council’s rural broadband champion, who is the non-mover and non-shaker of this particular non-project:

ptwiss@eastdevon.gov.uk

In the past, Councillor Twiss has been quick to comment on this blog, we look forward to his comments on this topic.

‘Say NO to Sidford Business Park’, PUBLIC MEETING on Monday 12th Sept September 10, 2016

A public meeting organised by Sidford & Sidbury residents, with the support of East Devon Alliance, will be held at Sidford Social Hall, Byes Lane, on Monday 12 September. Doors open at 6.30 pm for 7.15pm start. Coffee and teas available on arrival. Information displays to browse.

Sidmouth Town Council have already expressed serious objections to the height of buildings ‘up to 15 metres tall’ in Fords’ planning application.

image

Imagine a London bus of equivalent height, to get some idea of the scale.
There’s more information on http://www.facebook.com/saynotosidfordbusinesspark

‘Say NO to Sidford Business Park’, PUBLIC MEETING on Monday 12th Sept

Where’s Hugo? Judging a dog show in Parliament

Do you have a dog show you want judging in East Devon? Hugo Swire is your go-to man.

John Crace’s political diary for last week in The Guardian:

“At last something Labour can win. For years now, the title of Westminster dog of the year has been a safe Tory seat, but Labour MP Jonathan Reynolds’ two labradoodles,

Clinton and Kennedy, managed to see off a strong field to be crowned 2016 champions. “I speak for everyone in the Labour party when I say it’s about time we won something, so we might as well accept this,” Reynolds said.

Mind you, Clinton and Kennedy did have an advantage as the competition seemed to be rigged in favour of the bigger dogs: the assault course jumps were twice the size of Clem, the diminutive shih tzu owned by Labour MP Anna Turley.

Despite there being two Tories on the judging panel – Andrea Jenkyns and

Hugo Swire

the owners of last year’s winners – the result wasn’t well received by some Tories, who felt Reynolds’ pooches should have been marked down for not being sound enough on Brexit.”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/sep/09/may-minds-her-grammars-all-due-to-a-lack-of-a-decent-ringbinder?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

The Chinese way of doing business?

Our LEP and the Government need to keep their eyes wide open if Hinkley C goes ahead according to this report!

” … China’s growing industrial sector has been hard on the aluminum producers in the United States. In 2000 there were 23 smelters operating nationwide, now there are only five.

So when an aluminum executive named Jeff Henderson got wind of a giant stockpile of Chinese aluminum just below the U.S border with Mexico, he decided to commission a plane to check it out.

What did they find?

Six percent of the world’s aluminum, worth some $2 billion and enough to make 77 billion beer cans, according to the Journal’s fascinating report.

The revelation led to tensions between U.S. trade authorities and China, as U.S. industry executives insist that the metal is linked to Liu Zhongtian, who runs China Zhongwang Holdings, an enormous industrial aluminum company.

U.S. industry officials allege the metal got there as part of a scheme to evade trade restrictions. The idea was to move aluminum through Mexico into the U.S. where it could benefit from provisions in the North American Free Trade Agreement.

“These things have nothing to do with me,” Liu told the Journal, although the results of the investigation cast doubt on that claim.

Aluminum manufacturing is subsidized in China, and so Chinese firms were able to undercut U.S. producers; the United States responded by setting up tariffs to make domestic aluminum more attractive.

Routing Chinese aluminum through Mexico was a way to get around those tariffs.

Things went awry when a one of Liu’s alleged business partners Po-Chi “Eric” Shen, started to gain attention over some of his erratic practices, which the Journal report highlighted and included spending fortunes on dubious expenses like $70 million worth of red diamonds and rare Ferraris.

The relationship allegedly deteriorated quickly — Shen made headlines in 2014 when he wrecked Liu’s sports car while vacationing in Italy, and was rescued by Rowan Atkinson, of Mr. Bean fame.

The metal may never make it to the United States, in fact there are currently plans to ship it back to Asia, this time Vietnam.”

http://uk.businessinsider.com/a-chinese-billionaire-may-have-hidden-6-of-the-worlds-aluminum-in-the-mexican-desert-2016-9?amp?r=US&IR=T

East Devon Alliance fields Brixington by-election candidate

… who makes his views known in a letter to the Exmouth Journal:

Messrs O’Day and Huett, correspondents in your September 1 issue, summed up perfectly the continuing and absolute disregard shown by East Devon District Council (EDDC) towards Exmouth residents.

What is it that EDDC does not understand about the frustration and anger which is brought about by its plans? Why has there been no action following the town poll to request proper consultation on these plans?

Any commercial organisation acting in what I consider such an arrogant and dismissive manner towards its customers would soon be out of business.

EDDC is acting as if it has an absolute right to do with taxpayers’ money and assets as it sees fit.

The officers appear to be running a monopoly, with no competition for the services provided and no fear of losing their extremely well paid jobs.

The ruling group of Conservative councillors have been in place for a long time and seem to have consequently developed a sense of entitlement.

They act as if the money they spend, eg on their proposed seafront development, is theirs alone. It is our money and, as such, we must be involved in how it is spent.

There is a solution though, as shown by Mr Lowder in your September 1 issue.

Local democracy means turning out to vote in the Brixington by-election on October 6 and, if you disagree with how the ruling party is behaving, then vote for change.

Robin Humphreys
Prospective East Devon Alliance candidate
Trelivan Close, Exmouth”

http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/robin-humphreys/20160909/exmouth-journal-perhaps-time-vote-change/

Co-operative Party to split from Labour?

“The Co-operative party aims to develop some “distinctive and independent” policy stances separate from those of Labour, its chairman has said before the party’s annual conference.

The political movement, whose strapline is “politics for people”, has been allied to Labour since 1927, and 25 MPs currently sit in parliament on a joint ticket.

The party recently rejected speculation that it could be a vehicle for Labour MPs who oppose Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership to split away and form their own movement. It is staying neutral in the Labour leadership contest.

Gareth Thomas, the MP for Harrow West and Co-operative chair, said the party would be making more of an effort ahead of its 100-year anniversary in 2017 to develop a voice more of its own.

“We want to be more distinctive,” he said. “We are very clear we want to stay in the [European] single market. We see it as an exercise in international cooperation. And we are pretty pro-business as a party. It is co-op businesses that set us up and which continue to affiliate to us, and it is one of the things that marks us out. We have very good links into the co-operative business community as well.”

The party is launching a policy pamphlet arguing for care recipients, their families and carers to be represented on the boards of private companies providing social care services.

It is also calling for carers working for private social care providers, many of whom are very low paid, to have a right to take over their company – a “right to own” – if it is at risk of closure or is changing hands.

The party said the measures were being put forward to tackle the twin crises in adult social care in England: concerns about poor quality care, and endemic low pay and poor terms and conditions for the workforce.”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/sep/09/co-operative-party-policies-distinct-labour-100-anniversary

Franksy strikes again!

image

And adds the following comment:

Visual comment on the plans for the watersports centre. If it is built on the same side of the road as the lifeboat station, with the new road running behind it, then present users of the seafront carpark will be pushed further back to the recently closed Arnold Palmer putting course. That means a longer trek to the beach carrying everything. If EDDC have their way, they plan to invite a huge number of extra visitors to the area, which will mean more people, more cars overall and possible congestion on the road into Exmouth.

Many years ago, a teacher from Exmouth Community College asked if a youth club could be set up in “La Cuisine”- the old cafe at the open air swimming pool. This idea was repeatedly quashed as it would bring “boy racers’ and gangs of youngsters to the sea front and the residents would not like it. How ironic that the same council are now welcoming a huge development which will have massive implications for the appearance and use of the seafront with alcohol, litter, noise, coming and going as they seek to develop the “Nightime economy.”

Beware residents- you have seen nothing yet ! Franksy”

No more out-of-hours GP service for Exmouth

Interesting because Exmouth at around 35,000 population is substantially bigger than Honiton, with its 12,000 population.

“Devon Doctors, which runs the out-of-hours GP services in the region, is planning to combine the scheme with Devon’s NHS 111 service, which it will take over next month.

Under the plans due to take effect on October 1, treatment centres such as the one at Exmouth Hospital will close in favour of patients phoning the 111 service for help.

Currently, there is one GP who provides out-of-hours care on weekday evenings and two at the weekends.

This change means there will be no GP working in Exmouth and patients may face having to travel to Exeter or Honiton for treatment.”

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/exmouth_set_to_lose_out_of_hours_gp_1_4689459

North-East devolution called off by Javid

“Devolution for the north-east of England is “off the table”, communities secretary Sajid Javid has said.

Plans for the area’s first directly elected mayor have been scrapped and the relevant legislation withdrawn.

On Tuesday four of the seven North East Combined Authority councils decided to halt plans amid fears over post-Brexit funding from the government.

Mr Javid was “very disappointed” they had voted against the “ambitious and far-reaching devolution deal”, he said.

Sunderland, Durham, Gateshead and South Tyneside councils said they were not satisfied with reassurances over funding following the UK’s decision to leave the European Union.

Newcastle, North Tyneside and Northumberland councils said they remained committed to the plan.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-37312978

“Counties and districts demand funding top up when business rates fall short”

East Devon will, of course be losing ALL the business rates raised by the East Devon Growth Point which will go directly to our Local Enterprise Partnership. We haven’t heard our council complaining- quite the opposite.

“County and district councils have called on the government to commit to providing additional funding for local services where demand outstrips business rate growth following the forthcoming localisation of the levy.

In a joint statement of shared principles on the government’s business rate retention proposals, the County Councils Network, District Councils’ Network and Rural Services Network warned services could be hit without funding guarantees.

The government plans to devolve business rates to authorities by 2019-20. A funding baseline is likely to be set for town halls using local business rates as well as either a top up or tariff payment to reflect a new assessment of local need. Authorities will then retain all local growth – up from the 50% share currently allotted to the sector – and will be financially self-sufficient. Together with other locally raised revenue, mainly council tax, business rates growth will be used to provide council services.

However, the groups said today that the system would need to be monitored to ensure funding matches local demand over time.

“If core statutory demand-led service pressures, such as social care, are set to outstrip resources over time, central government should work with local government to agree additional funding sources,” the document stated.

“Local and central government should consider and agree a way of managing additional risks to local authorities of full retention and find a way of compensating against sharp changes in income or need.”

The groups also called for all areas to have the ability to both lower and raise the rates multiplier. Under the current proposals, authorities will only be able to cut the levy, although city region combined authorities will be able to increase the rate to pay for specific infrastructure projects.

A consultation on the basis for the devolved system is open until 26 September. Views are also being sought on areas where local authorities could take on the funding of services in order to make the plan initially fiscally neutral. Areas suggested by government include public health, early years, youth justice and the attendance allowance paid to help meet care costs.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/09/counties-and-districts-demand-funding-top-when-business-rates-fall-short