Proposed Sidford Industrial estate – flooding issues

Being planned on older flooding regulations because the application went in before they changed.

Today’s newspaper:

“The A375 between Sidford and Sidbury road is partially flooded and difficult driving conditions are reported on the A375 Sidbury Hill in both directions. Cotford and Woolbrook Road are also flooded.”

The Environment Agency is already in trouble for not spending money it was allocated for natural flood prevention schemes.

What about unnatural flood increase schemes?

If you had a child car seat that you bought a while ago that was declared unsafe for children under new regulations, would you continue to use it?

Why are developers allowed to ignore new regulations if their planning applications went in before changes which are designed to keep people and property safer?

UPDATE 5 pm: “The A375 is closed at Sidbury due to flooding and a landslip.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/here-s-how-you-ll-get-home-tonight-in-exeter-mid-and-east-devon/story-29921797-detail/story.html

Services outsourcing firm to drop health care and concentrate on commercial cleaning

“Mitie has published its second profit warning in two months after the outsourcing company’s customers continued to reduce spending due to rising costs and economic uncertainty.

The company also said it would withdraw from its healthcare business, which provides home care for the elderly. The £128m cost of writing off the business drove Mitie to a £100m pre-tax loss for the first half of the year. …

… Mitie put its healthcare division under review in September and will now look for a company to take over the business or allow its contracts to wind down. Local councils have been seeking price cuts from the loss-making business, prompting Mitie to conclude it was unviable.”

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/nov/21/mitie-withdraws-healthcare-second-profit-warning-shares

Save Exmouth Seafront meeting – 1 December 2016, 7.30 pm Harbour Cafe

see:

https://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/event/save-exmouth-seafront-ses-meeting/

and Exmouth Splash Facebook page

Devon worst hit by Storm Angus weather and floods – but little money for future prevention

“The government has been accused of being “all talk and no action” on flood defences, as the first named storm of the season brought flooding and power cuts to the south of England.

Storm Angus saw gusts of up to 106mph recorded 23 miles off the coast of Margate, while gusts of 80mph hit Langdon Bay, also in Kent.

While Met Office weather warnings connected with Storm Angus expired at 1pm on Sunday as the storm moved out to the North Sea, a new series of warnings were issued for Monday and Tuesday for heavy rain in south-west England, parts of northern England and Wales.

Andy Page, chief meteorologist at the Met Office, said Devon was likely to be most affected. “Although the more persistent rain should clear from Devon by early afternoon, heavy and possibly thundery showers are likely to follow,” he said.

UK government not funding natural flood prevention methods

“Around 20-30mm of rain is expected fall in a three- to six-hour period in places, with as much as 40-60mm possible locally through the whole of Monday. The ground has been left very wet from Saturday night’s rain and this increases the risk of further flooding.”

Page added that the band of rain affecting parts of southern England and Wales on Monday would extend to parts of northern England later on Monday and into Tuesday morning.

The warnings came as the government was accused of failing to deliver on promises to fund “natural” flood management schemes such as planting trees.

A freedom of information request by the environmental group Friends of the Earth to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) revealed that there was no funding earmarked specifically for natural flood management, despite ministers saying they would fund such measures.

Natural flood management schemes aim to slow the movement of water downstream to prevent flooding. This can involve creating water storage such as ponds, planting trees along water courses and restoring rivers to their original meandering path.

In his budget in March, then-chancellor George Osborne announced an extra £700m for “innovative flood defence measures”. Friends of the Earth understands that former floods minister Rory Stewart earmarked £20m for natural flood defences before he left Defra in the June reshuffle.

In a recent letter to environmental charities, the environment secretary, Andrea Leadsom, wrote: “I fully support natural defence initiatives such as planting trees, which can slow the flow of water.”

Guy Shrubsole, climate campaigner for Friends of the Earth, said last winter’s floods “were a powerful reminder that we need to work with nature to reduce flood risk – and ministers wholeheartedly agreed”.

“So far it’s been all talk and no action,” he said. “The government has failed to spend a single extra penny on natural flood management.”

“Ministers must replace warm words with hard cash and announce a pot of at least £20m for natural flood defence in this year’s autumn statement. Anything less will be a betrayal of the communities that flooded so terribly last winter.”

A Defra spokesman said: “We’re committed to better protecting the country from flooding and natural flood management plays an important role in our strategy.

“We’re spending a record £2.5bn on flood defences to better protect 300,000 more homes by 2021 and many of these projects are already using natural flood management measures.”

The Environment Agency also issued nine flood warnings and 57 less serious flood alerts in the south-west and parts of the north of England.

Alison Baptiste, national flood duty manager at the Environment Agency, said teams had been working through the night and were now preparing for further flooding as rain continues over the next couple of days.

“People should remember not to drive through floodwater and be aware travel may be disrupted,” she said. “Environment Agency teams will clear blockages in rivers, continue to issue flood warnings and may operate flood gates and sea defences.”

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/nov/21/government-criticised-for-lack-of-natural-flood-management-schemes?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

One-third of doctors say they have not heard about projected NHS cuts!

Are they all working so hard they have no time to read newspapers?

“The BMA, which today reveals the £22billion spending shortfall, said a survey found two-thirds of doctors had no input in the plans and a third had not even heard of them.

Its council chairman Dr Mark Porter added: “Given the scale of the savings required, there is a risk these plans will be used as a cover for delivering cuts… starving services of resource and patients of vital care. It is extremely concerning that the majority of doctors have not been consulted on the plans, particularly as ministers have been so keen to insist that all ­stakeholders would be involved.”

The Lib Dems demanded an urgent £4billion cash injection for the NHS and social care services to stop the crisis getting worse. Health spokesman Norman Lamb said: “NHS and care services are on the precipice as we approach the winter months.

“Waiting lists are growing, deficits hit record levels this year and staff are under unsustainable pressure.

“In social care, thousands of people are seeing services withdrawn and 15-minute visits have become the norm as councils struggle to make ends meet.”

A report by health think-tank the Kings Fund blasted the secrecy surrounding the Sustainability and ­Transformation Plans, which are being finalised by health chiefs around the UK.

Cheshire and Merseyside is one of the largest affected areas. Three hospitals could be axed and “merged” on to a single site to plug its black hole. Birmingham and Solihull trusts face a £712million ­shortfall, putting services at risk of closure.

Somerset’s two main hospitals in Yeovil and Taunton may merge key departments including cancer and maternity wards. In Berkshire, Oxfordshire and ­Buckinghamshire, bosses are planning to cut the staff payroll by £35million to help meet a £479million deficit.

It is a similarly depressing story in most other regions as Tory austerity continues to batter services, morale and patient safety.

But NHS medical director Professor Sir Bruce Keogh insisted: “We are talking about steady incremental ­improvement, not a big bang, tackling things doctors and nurses have been telling us for years.”

The Department of Health added: “The NHS already has its own plan, designed by NHS leaders, which sets out how we can transform services and improve standards of care in building a more responsive, modern health system.”

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/secret-plan-22billion-nhs-cuts-9299803

Joint Norfolk/ Suffolk devolution plan scrapped – Suffolk allowed to go it alone

Any council in Devon prepared to call time on the Somerset/Devon deal so Devon can stand on its own two feet? Not EDDC for sure – Diviani and Williams are enjoying themselves too much with the Local Enterprise Partnership …

“Plans to devolve powers to Norfolk and Suffolk with a mayor have been scrapped by the government in their present form.

It follows Thursday night’s vote by King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Council to overwhelmingly reject the deal.

The devolution plans were set to bring to the East £750m over 30 years for infrastructure and £130m for housing.

The new set-up would have given the new authority road and housing powers from central government.

A meeting of Norfolk County Council due to take place on Monday to consider devolution has been cancelled.

Analysis by Andrew Sinclair, BBC Look East Political Correspondent

I am told the Local Government Secretary Sajid Javid has decided that the deal can’t go ahead in its present form.

As a result Norfolk County Council has cancelled Monday’s meeting when councillors would have voted on the plan.

But Suffolk is being told to continue with its meetings next week as ministers feel Suffolk devolution on its own may work.

Norfolk County Council leader Cliff Jordan said: “The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government has been clear throughout the devolution process that for a combined authority to be set up all participating councils would need to consent to his draft order. As a result of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk’s decision, we understand the Secretary of State will be writing to the Norfolk and Suffolk authorities to take the current devolution deal off the table.

“I will be making clear to the Secretary of State that Norfolk County Council continues to be willing to discuss alternative proposals.”
Jennie Jenkins, chair of Suffolk County Council’s public sector leaders group, said she was disappointed by King’s Lynn’s vote.

“We will be seeking to explore the potential for a Suffolk-based devolution deal and to investigate options for establishing interim governance arrangements for any such alternative deal,” she said.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-38030289

Landowner refuses zero-cost flood prevention scheme to protect homeowners

What happens when a landowner refuses to allow a flood prevention scheme that will affect a small part of his land and will cost him nothing. Could it happen here – you bet it could.

A farmer is blockading a city’s £13m plan to save hundreds of homes and businesses from flooding in a landmark legal battle against the government.

The Environment Agency (EA) wants to build a 465-metre long dam on a parcel of Gary Sharp’s scenic Essex farmland to save Chelmsford’s historic urban centre from being deluged. But the 54-year- old is going to extreme lengths to deny the EA acces to his land.

Mr Sharp has bought-up neighbouring land, turned down compensation deals and spent thousands in court in a bid to prevent the dam being built.

The father-of- two is preparing to challenge an obscure piece of waterworks legislation at the Court of Appeal early next year in an attempt to scupper the EA’s plans. Only last month, MPs suggested the EA be stripped of its flood defence responsibilities, in what would be a huge embarrassment for the Government agency. But Mr Sharp is adamant he will continue to impede the flood protection works from being built on his land.

The farmer, who has a 1,500 strong herd of cattle, said: “Why shouldn’t I fight it? “It’s my land at the end of the day and it’s my livestock. Why should they take it away and do whatever they like?” He added: “I don’t think I’m being selfish. The city council owns a huge area, Hylands Park in the south of Chelmsford – why doesn’t the Government put it on their own land?”

The EA says the Chelmsford scheme will save 548 homes and 235 commercial properties, in and around the town’s Old Moulsham shopping quarter, from up to 500m gallons of gushing water if riverbanks burst.

The entire county capital, crowned Britain’s youngest city during the Queen’s 2012 jubilee, is uniquely situated in a sprawling flood plain. But the EA operation rests on building the 5.2m-high wall and sluice gates around 10 miles upstream on Mr Sharp’s land. The EA effectively wants a part of his impressive portfolio of 1,200 acres, nestled within the villages of Margaretting and Stock, to be sacrificed as the city’s flood zone.

When the agency tried to purchase the neighbouring 680-acre Margaretting Hall Farm, priced at £8.25m, after owner John Currie died in January 2014, Mr Sharp bought it instead.

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Efra) select committee MPs published a report, on 28 October, claiming the EA was “over-reliant” on traditional defences and suggested more natural measures like planting trees. North West National Farmers Union director David Hall, who spearheaded the response to Cumbria’s devastating floods last year, described it as “the right solution”.

Since the council gave the Chelmsford scheme permission in February 2013, Mr Sharp’s case has reached the High Court at least twice, and is due to reach the Court of Appeal by the end of February.

It is understood the appeal will challenge the EA’s use of Section 165 and Section 177 of the Water Resources Act 1991, which gives government authority over land. Mr Sharp said: “I don’t know exactly know how much I’ve spent but it’s not the amount of money that matters.”

Lifelong Chelmsford resident Jim Rankin, 32, who manages a farm shop less than 100 metres from the River Wid banks, said: “The scheme seems like a waste of money. I’ve lived in Chelmsford my whole life and seen flooding around the Wid, but it’s never got near here so I can’t see it affecting us. It seems like overkill.”

But Chelmsford City Council leader Roy Whitehead, who described the upcoming hearing as a test case, said: “It’s frustrating. “My personal view is Mr Sharp is clearly looking after his own interests and by doing so it could put the residents of many, many, houses in Chelmsford at risk of flooding.

“However, a lot of the residents at risk of flooding are undoubtedly unaware of what’s going on, and often you only know about the risk of flooding until it comes through your front door. “Flooding so far in Chelmsford has been relatively modest, but if you’re told by professionals the city’s going to flood, you listen and take precautions.”

The EA has defended the flood relief scheme as vital to the future of the city. An EA spokesman said: “The Chelmsford flood alleviation scheme will provide vital flood protection to over 900 homes and businesses in the Chelmsford area.

“We have completed work protecting 130 homes and businesses in Chelmer Village (a separate project) and now await the decision of the court of appeal before we can continue to build the scheme.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/19/landowner-in-court-fight-to-block-flood-protection-scheme/

Daily Telegraph says street protests could reduce NHS bed losses

The Labour Party has a national day of action on Saturday 26 November 2016.
Devon has a county-wide non-political protest (“Draw a Red Line”) on Saturday 3 December midday Bedford Square, Exeter (see above for information)

Hospital closures planned to shore up NHS finances could be derailed if enough people take to the streets in protest, a health service chief has said.

Chris Hopson, leader of England’s hospitals sector, said public unrest and opposition by local MPs could scupper so-called Sustainability and Transformation Plans (STPs), which are billed as crucial to the long-term viability of the health service.

On Monday the respected think tank The King’s Fund heavily criticised health bosses for trying to organise the sweeping closure of hospitals and NHS units in secret, moves which it said could put lives at risk.

Yesterday Mr Hopson, Chief Executive of NHS Providers, said architects of the schemes were so far failing to engage local communities, which “have the ability to sink plans they don’t support”.

“It’s very difficult for the NHS to proceed with wholescale change if you’ve got people out on the streets marching with placards and banners and saying “don’t do this”,” he said.

“Fundamentally you can’t make big changes to service provision without taking local people with you.”

The plans follow an admission in May that the provider sector overspent by a historic £2.45 billion in the last financial year.

The country has been divided into 44 areas, with each ordered to come up with a proposal that both closes the gap and caters for booming patient demand.

So far the plans involve the closure of one of five major hospitals in South West London, an A&E unit in the North East of England, the loss of almost 600 beds in Devon and the possible closure of two A&E units in St Helens and West Lancashire.

Mr Hopson yesterday said unit closures were too widely being regarded as a “silver bullet” to make the “overambitious and undeliverable” plans conform to tight budgets.

“We have become obsessed by the money and not got the public engagement right,” he said.

“We are also trying to do it too quickly.”

But Sir Bruce Keogh, the NHS medical director, has this week there was “plenty of time” for the public to shape the changes.

External auditors not best placed to review Local Plan – Duh!

Honestly, you could not make it up. Independent councillors recently flagged that the NEXT review of the existing Local Plan needs to be sorted out NOW and not (as in the past) faffed-about with at the last minute.

So, some bright spark came up with the idea of asking EDDC’s FINANCIAL external auditor (KPMG) to get it going. Here is what happened next.

Problem (page 134 of agenda papers):
Undertake a Review of the process for writing the Local Plan in future”

The solution
“A meeting has been held with our external auditors to scope out this review but it was quickly determined that they are not the right people to undertake this review due to their lack of knowledge of the plan making process. Other options including using the Planning Advisory Service (PAS) are now being pursued.”

Click to access 241116-scrutiny-agenda-combined.pdf

Duh, duh and more duh!

NHS cuts on EDDC scrutiny agenda – 24 November 2016, 6 pm

The full consultation document begins on page 9:

Click to access 241116-scrutiny-agenda-combined.pdf

English devolution: 4 deficits and “unelected dictatorship”

In an article on the London School of Economics website by Bob Hudson, a Professor in the Centre for Public Policy and Health, University of Durham, he argues that the current process has four major deficits and goes i to detail about each one. The four are:

Democratic Deficit
Constitutional Deficit
Financial Deficit
Strategic Deficit

An interesting comment on the article from Malcolm Bell reads:

The whole trend in contemporary government is to suppress democracy and impose control by unelected elites. The principle is established in the EU where the commission trumps the elected Parliament. Devolution to the regions is intended to develop this theme. The British government is rapidly changing to decision-making in the increasingly remote “executive” as the House loses control. It used to be said that we had an elected dictatorship, that is rapidly being replaced by an unelected dictatorship of the elite. Accountability is almost entirely a thing of the past, this is not accidental but deliberate policy.”

So much for sovereignty of Parliament!

Ottery St Mary NHS cuts public consultation meeting, 29 November, King’s School, 6 pmh

There will be a public meeting at the King’s School in Ottery St Mary on Tuesday 29 November, to consult residents on plans to shut 72 community hospital beds in Eastern Devon – and on introducing a new model of care on looking after more people in their own homes.

Last year NEW Devon Clinical Commissioning Group made a decision to shut all the general medical beds at Ottery Hospital as well as Crediton and Axminster. We now have 15 temporary stroke beds at Ottery but they are set to transfer to the RD&E in due course.

The CCG was not planning to hold a meeting in Ottery but myself, Cllr Elli Pang and Ottery Town Council all wrote requesting that a meeting be held in the town to update people on the new model of caring for people in their own homes and what plans there are for the hospital.

The meeting at the King’s School is from 6-8pm on Wednesday 29 November.

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/public_meeting_in_ottery_st_mary_to_debate_plans_to_shut_more_community_hos

“How to keep house prices low forever”

“Imagine a world in which the price of housing stopped rising as predictably as a hydrogen-filled balloon. And imagine a country in which houses would be just as affordable in 10 years’ time as they were 10 years ago. There would be no race to buy a home, no fear that prices would accelerate faster than you can save up for the deposit. Houses would cease to be a means of profit, and instead become just a place to live.

But this is no John Lennon-inspired fantasy. It is about to come to fruition in the East End of London, in an extraordinary experiment. For the first time, future property prices will be tied to the rise in wages.

In a couple of weeks the first of 23 families will move in to an old mental health hospital in Tower Hamlets that has been converted into flats. They will pay a third of market value. When they come to sell, the price they are allowed to charge will be limited by the increase in local wages, as measured by the Office for National Statistics.

Amongst the buyers are Rachael and Nathaniel Evans and their young son Griffin. Despite their joint income of £33,000, and savings of nearly £70,000, they have been unable to afford anything in the area. But now, thanks to the local Community Land Trust (CLT), they will soon be moving into a home of their own.

“It is amazing. It is life-changing for us,” says Nathaniel, who has lived in Tower Hamlets all his life. “I imagine walking into the flat and thinking, ‘this is ours,’ and we don’t have to leave.”

But the wage link is significant. When Rachael and Nathaniel eventually decide to sell, their property’s value will not have gone up in line with the market. Typically, wages have risen by less than 2% a year over the last decade, dipping as low as 0.7% as recently as June 2014. At the same time, despite a few dips, house prices have soared by up to 9%, easily outpacing wages.

If that trend continues, the relative value of their flat will decline, making it hard for them to move elsewhere. As a result, linking house prices to wages requires a very different attitude, says Calum Green, co-director of the London CLT. “These homes should be considered homes, not assets,” he tells the BBC. “It should be a place where you want to live for many, many years. It’s not all about ladders and working your way up. …”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37941426

The REAL-LIFE Devon NHS cuts

“The proximity of North Devon district hospital to Anne-Marie Wiles’ home – it is less than five minutes away – is crucial.

Her twin sons, Jed and Peirce, were given just six months to live after being born with multiple complex health needs. They are now doing well, aged 16, thanks in large part to the efforts of a loving family, but also the dedicated staff at the hospital in Barnstaple.

“I intentionally live opposite the hospital because when the boys stop breathing there is not enough time to call an ambulance,” said Wiles. Jed has been resuscitated three times at the NDDH and both have been nursed countless times at the Caroline Thorpe children’s ward.

“If these services end then my boys will for certain die once they become ill,” said Wiles. “I am fearful of losing my children.”

She is one of thousands who have joined marches, written to local MPs, organised benefit gigs, signed petitions over the Wider Devon STP – sustainability and transformation plan – which is proposing radical changes to healthcare in the county.

If the plan comes to fruition in its present form, 600 community and acute beds across this sprawling, largely rural county will be gone within five years.

Cherished community hospitals at Honiton in the east – nicknamed the Honiton Hilton because it so beloved – Okehampton in central Devon and Paignton and Dartmouth in the south would go. There have been howls of protest everywhere – but nowhere more than in and around Barnstaple.

Here there is deep alarm that the plan may lead to the shutting down of maternity, neonatology and paediatric services as well as triggering the loss of other departments, including A&E. The Royal Devon and Exeter hospital is 50 miles away – an hour and 10 minutes by car down a winding road if conditions are good, much more if not.

Tina Day’s son, Jaiden-Lee, was born at the NDDH with a collapsed lung and spent a week in the special care baby unit for a week before developing type 1 diabetes. “It terrifies me if services like maternity and A&E are re-located. People will die, guaranteed,” said Day.

John Tate claimed his wife and daughter would both have died had the NDDH not been near. “My daughter had her umbilical cord wrapped around her neck. She had breathing problems and was trapped head down. This caused my wife life-threatening problems. An emergency cesarean saved their lives. Both would have died if Barnstaple was not there.”

Crystal Steinberg said the closure of the maternity department would make her think twice about having a second child. She underwent an emergency caesarean section because her unborn baby, Dylan, was in distress. “I do not want to be stranded at the side of the road while my uterus ruptures and my baby and I die.”

It is not just mums who are worried. Tracy, 46, suffers from a mental health condition that leaves her suicidal. “I have been to A&E three times this month after being picked up by police.” Should the A&E close she believes she would be held in a cell or have to head to Exeter. “I’d have no way of getting there but to walk or hitch. Both are a scary.”

Jacob Egan, seven, was so concerned when he got wind of the proposals that he dictated a letter to Theresa May. He has brittle asthma, which can result in severe attacks, and has been admitted to the NDDH around 10 times.

“Dear prime minister,” he said. “Just think about it, every time any child in our area of north Devon needed to go to hospital they would have to go to Exeter. Exeter is a long distance away and if your heartbeat stopped you couldn’t just wait for a train or car to get you there.”

At the heart of the plan is a “new model of integrated care” that will “reduce reliance on bed-based care and enable people to live healthy independent lives for longer, closer to where they live”. In other words the idea is to look after people at home rather than in hospital.

According to the latest draft of the report, which is up for consultation, every day more than 600 people in Devon are medically fit to leave hospital beds but do not.

The plans argues change must take place. Health and social care services in Devon are likely to be £557m in deficit in 2020/21 if nothing is done, the plan says. It also says the system as it stands isn’t working. The 95% standard for patients being seen in A&E within four hours is not being met – the Devon system is currently achieving 91.6%.

Devon’s demographics also have to be taken into account. There are more elderly people here than in other parts of the UK – in one area of Torquay almost one in 10 are aged over 85. Some need a lot of care – in north, east and west Devon, 40% of people use almost 80% of health and social care.

Angela Pedder, lead chief executive for the plan, said she understood people’s concerns. “But if we sit back and say let’s just let things happen, that’s a much bigger risk not just for the whole of Devon.

“We have to be pro-active. We have responsibilities to make sure the service is safe and sustainable two, five, 10 years down the line. That’s what we’ve got to plan for. That’s the framework we are trying to put in place.”

Politicians, activists and patients are not impressed.

The East Devon Tory MP Hugo Swire said: “We are in danger of putting the cart before the horse. Until we can absolutely ensure that we have got social care right, we should not look at unnecessarily closing community beds.”

Jan Goffey, the mayor of Okehampton, called the proposals cruel and claimed the NHS was being “dismembered”. If the people who actually live in Barnstaple are worried, those that live even further north – and so even further from Exeter – are even more concerned.

Sarah Vander, who runs a shop in the cliff-top village of Lynton, 20 miles north-east of Barnstaple, said her mother had been saved from a stroke and her husband from a diabetic hypo – a drop in blood glucose level – because they got to the NDDH quickly. “We are incredibly remote and we must be able to rely on the excellent services of NDDH otherwise the simple fact is, people will die unnecessarily.”

The seaside town of Ilfracombe, 12 miles north of Barnstaple, suffers a double whammy. The town is isolated and some areas are deprived: life expectancy in central Ilfracombe is 75 compared with 90 in parts of east Devon.

Rebecca McGarry, from Ilfracombe, the mother of daughters aged two and three, said she felt sick thinking about the prospect of losing services. Both her children have received excellent treatment in Barnstaple including for severe croup, which makes it difficult for them to breathe.

McGarry’s husband is a carer and needs the car for work so she often has to take her children to the hospital on the bus. “I honestly don’t know how we would manage if these appointments were moved even further away. The idea that such a remote region should lose these vital services is totally absurd. People will lose their lives if these closures do happen.”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/nov/18/nhs-cuts-in-devon-if-these-services-end-my-boys-will-for-certain-die

May’s right-hand man implicated in election expenses scandal?

This is the same scandal that our Police and Crime Commissioner, Alison Hernandez is involved in as an election agent in Torquay just prior to becoming PCC.

“Michael Crick over at Channel 4 news has kept on digging into the series of Conservative election expense scandals which have seen more of Theresa May’s MPs implicated than the size of her majority:

Theresa May’s Downing Street aide is in the spotlight amid questions over the Conservatives, campaign to stop Nigel Farage winning a seat in Parliament at the last election.

Channel 4 News, which has been investigating the party’s election spending since February, has obtained new evidence suggesting a “crack team” of Tories including Mr Timothy were involved in Craig Mackinlay’s local campaign from a hotel in Ramsgate.

Kent Police and the Electoral Commission are currently investigating whether the Conservative Party broke the law by failing to properly declare tens of thousands of pounds in hotel bills, including approximately £14,000 at the Royal Harbour Hotel in Ramsgate where Mr Timothy stayed.

Rather oddly, the Conservative Party’s explanation as given to Channel 4 is that Nick Timothy was working on the national campaign from the hotel in Ramsgate. Not working on it from his home, or from the Conservative Party’s national HQ where the national campaign was being run. But from a hotel in Ramsgate.

It’s the same explanation the Conservatives have given to the police (which ups the stakes about it being true rather):

Any national Conservative Party staff based in the Royal Harbour Hotel were part of a national campaign team and were engaged in activities at the direction of Conservative Central Headquarters.”

Other Conservative staff has been further implicated too as Channel 4 further reports:

The new evidence obtained by Channel 4 News also suggests that Conservative staff staying at the Royal Harbour Hotel were working on Craig Mackinlay’s local campaign.

The programme has obtained a large number of press releases sent out on behalf of Mr Mackinlay by the former Conservative Party Head of Press, Henry Macrory. Mr Macrory was part of the team who were guests at the Royal Harbour.

The press releases are branded “Craig Mackinlay – Conservative Candidate for South Thanet”. They contain Mr Mackinlay’s twitter handle and Facebook page. All say “For further information please call Henry Macrory”. The press releases were promoted by his local agent.

The programme has also obtained emails showing Mr Macrory acting as Mr Mackinlay’s press officer. In one email sent in March 2016, Mr Macrory told local journalists: “I will be helping out with Craig Mackinlay’s media during the election campaign.

“Please don’t hesitate to contact me if I can assist in any way. In the next few days or so I will start sending you a regular e-mail giving you an outline of what Craig will be up to during the week ahead.

http://www.markpack.org.uk/146484/nick-timothy-election-expenses/

Cause or effect? Sudden interest in EDW nuclear safety post

This week’s most visited page by far is one originally posted on 21 October 2016 about nuclear plants being shut down in France for safety reasons:

5 French nuclear reactors closed and 7 others examined for safety reasons

Coincidentally, one of the films on TV this week was “The China Syndrome” – a fictional story about a radioactive leak in a US nuclear power plant and its subsequent cover-up and unhappy ending.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_China_Syndrome#Plot

Coincidence?

Is a cost over-run of £1.1 million or £10 million more serious than a Section 106 loss of £250,000?

Owl asks because an elector successfully petitioned EDDC’s external auditor over Section 106 discrepancies. A sample found a wrongly-attributed bill of some £400,000 and an uncollected sum of around £250,000. As a result, the auditors have requested many changes in procedures:

Click to access item-12-management-of-s106-contributions-report.pdf

Now we hear at Cabinet this week that, in two years, development costs for Exmouth seafront have risen from £1.5 million to £3.2 million. Yet Cabinet apparently found this totally acceptable and, without detailed figures, nodded it through with no explanation of:

– what did the £1.5 million cover

and

– what does the extra £1.6 million cover.

Added to this, the projected cost of HQ relocation has risen from cost-neutral (zero due to sale of Knowle HQ for around £7 million) it is now said to be nearly £10 million – or at least that was figure a few months ago.

These are eye-watering numbers yet majority party councillors and auditors (internal and external) appear unconcerned.

Some scrutiny (internal and external) needed here, Owl thinks.

Two tier social care: rich and cared for or poor and neglected, says Conservative council leader

“A Conservative council leader says dozens of social care providers are cancelling contracts with local authorities and instead offering their services solely to wealthy private clients.

Izzi Seccombe, who is the Local Government Association’s spokesperson for social care, said the chancellor needed to take urgent action in the autumn statement to tackle a growing crisis in the sector.

She told the Guardian that a failure by Philip Hammond to plug a multibillion-pound financial black hole would result in elderly and disabled people no longer receiving help to get dressed, showered and fed.

“The challenge is we are underfunded and the concern is that if we cannot bridge those gaps with some funding through the autumn statement, we will not be able to address the needs of people who are vulnerable,” said Seccombe, the Tory leader of Warwickshire county council. She said people would instead have to turn to their GPs or local hospitals for help, resulting in a larger cost to the taxpayer in the long run.

Her comments come alongside a written warning to Hammond that councils across England and Wales are facing a £5.8bn funding gap by 2020. A document submitted by the LGA suggested there would be a serious squeeze on spending for social care, children’s services, homelessness, local parks and libraries. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/nov/18/care-providers-shunning-local-authorities-tory-councillor-claims

Exmouth seafront cost increase – fantasy, incompetent, iconic or ironic!

“Calls have been made for the sacking of the ‘owner’ of the Exmouth Seafront Regeneration Project after costs spiralled from £1.5million to more than £3million.

However, East Devon District Council’s (EDDC) cabinet backed the plans with a majority vote, despite heavy criticism from some councillors.

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/seafront_plans_backed_despite_soaring_costs_1_4780508

Rob Longhurst (Ind), Ben Ingham (Ind) and Eileen Wragg (LD) spoke against, saying that it was incompetence.

Ian Chubb said it was worth paying and he was happy paying the extra costs. Unclear whether he meant worth paying despite the increases or worth paying despite the incompetence, but nice of him to offer to fund the increased costs personally.

Phil Twiss said they had to proceed because to stop would be to go backwards. Of course only true because they have destroyed existing attractions before getting the plans right and before knowing the real costs – so they can’t go back.

Philip Skinner got his words mixed up when he said the plans were iconic but clearly he meant ironic, and thought it was good for Exmouth because they all like doing watersports.

Tom Wright obviously thought the debate was about football not water-sports because he kept referring to the premier league, and said that Exmouth residents should be grateful for the cost increases.

Honestly, Trump or EDDC Tories – not sure which are the greater fantasists!!”

Poor commercial judgement and skills at local authorities worrying

Hot on the heels of news that EDDC’s development costs for Exmouth seafront have more than doubled from £1.5m to £3.2m comes this report:

The increasing scale of commercial activity carried out by local authorities could put council finances at risk, and town halls might lack the necessary skills for such projects, the Public Accounts Committee has warned.

In a report examining the financial sustainability of local government, published today, MPs accused Whitehall of being complacent about the risk to local authority finances.

Today’s “Financial sustainability of local authorities” review highlighted that councils were increasingly undertaking commercial activity intended to generate revenue income from capital investment in properties and businesses in an effort to offset government cuts. This includes projects such as developing houses and commercial units for rent or sale.

But the MPs warned councils may lack experience of such schemes, and council tax bills or other services could be hit if they go wrong. They called on the Department for Communities & Local Government to review the commercial skills in different types of authorities, and provide an update by next summer on the scale and nature of these activities in order to better anticipate risks.

We do not share the department’s confidence that the increased commercial activity in the sector adds no particular risk to the department’s own work,” the report stated. The department should also work with CIPFA to ensure the local government capital finance framework “remains current and continues to reflect developments”.

Committee chair Meg Hillier said funding cuts had led councils to rethink the way they use public money, and the government wanted councils to become largely self-financing, including through business rates retention. However, she warned that poor investment decisions could cost money that might otherwise be spent on public services.

“Our committee has previously highlighted gaps in the commercial skills of the civil service as a factor in the failure of some projects and we have similar concerns about local government,” she stated.

“Local authorities need the skill-set to invest wisely and the department must bear its share of responsibility for ensuring these skills are in place. But more fundamentally, the information central government uses is inadequate for understanding trends and associated risks in local government finance.”

This represented a serious flaw in DCLG’s ability to plan properly for the future and ensure councils are following a sustainable path, she concluded, but the department was complacent about the risk. …