Channel 4 “Britain’s Housing Crisis” – notes

476,000 outstanding GRANTED planning permissions not commenced.

28% rise in planning permissions, 10% more completed homes.

Average delay from granting planning permission to starting construction up from 21 to 32 months.

Developers build out big sites very slowly to maximise profits says MP Clive Betts.

Oxford – most unaffordable city – land is being hoarded says Ed Turner, Oxford Councillor and a housing spokesperson for the Local Government Association. Developers “making a fast buck”.

Big developers have made serious money –

Persimmon profits up from £638 MILLION – up 34% on the previous year.
Taylor Wimpey £604m – also up 34%
Barratt Homes – £682m – up 45%

(these 3 builders provide a quarter of all new homes, the eight next largest more than a half, small builders around a quarter). In the 1980’s small builders built two-thirds of homes each year.

Community Secretary Javid talks the talk but isn’t walking the walk – said he wants to “break the stranglehold of developers”.

Home Builders Association – weasel words – 30% more new homes in last 2 years, industry not sitting on land banks – no reason why they would delay. Nothing their fault.

Reporter puzzled by that statement – it includes existing houses turned into multiple flats and shops converted to housing. Official government data shows in 2013 133,000 new homes built – lowest figures in over half a century. 2015 – 152,000 new homes – up only 14% over 2 years NOT 30% and from a very low base. Over this summer housebuilding actually fell.

Javid “determined to do something about it”!

Small builders feel shut out – no land particularly in London, only small sites available. Developers have too cosy a relationship with councils says one small builder. Public sector land is not being released to small builders.

Last year the Big 3 house builders completed 44,360 homes and had planning permission to build a further 200,823 homes. They have strategic land holdings that could accommodate a further 278,600 more homes.

“Option agreements” are common – paying landowners if planning permission is granted – but only they can buy the land – no-one else.

A farmer near Gatwick told his story – first approach “a chat” to sell an option for exclusive development. They offered £275m which the farmer rejected, saying the developer already has land nearby they can develop. But options are not always recorded by the Land Registry so it is hard to know who controls such land.

So what is Javid going to DO, asked the reporter – a White Paper next month – we can’t have a market dominated by big suppliers, more small developers needed. But no idea how he is going to do it!

Reporter pointed out that the big house builders are major donors to the Tory party.

The big house builders are not impressed by talks of fines for not starting new builds more quickly. The bloke from their association said that if you start restricting the house building industry they will react by reducing output. The reporter asked if that was a threat – the spokesperson denied that. He said that, if the big builders had to forfeit land with planning permission but not started, house builders will restrict the flow of planning applications.

Land banking taxes may be needed says reporter, as the system is broken.

Nasty.

The “successful reconfiguration” of North Devon health services exposed

Report sent to the Secretary of State by STITCH (Save The Irreplaceable Torrington Community hospital) refuting the claims that there has been a “successful reconfiguration” of hospital services in North Devon, exposing the flaws (? and worse) of the claims made by the CCG and other interest groups.

This report (and others on the site) is more than 10,000 words long and deserves to be read in its entirety with its shocking evidence and conclusions:

http://stitch.org.uk/News.html

Health Select Committee: winter pressures unsustainable

Is our CCG crazy when it tries to cut community hospital beds? It would seem so from the report quoted below. So why is it happening? Because the NHS is underfunded and not overspent but our CCG is too lily-livered to say so. Or too well-recompensed for the cuts.

Please don’t go down the “immigrants taking our beds” route! Immigrants in the NHS are fighting this battle with us and for us as front-line staff, and no-one is saying that Hinkley C is being built to keep immigrant lights on!

Our NHS is being destroyed under our noses.

“… The increase in attendances in the last 5 years is equivalent to the workload of 10 medium sized departments in England alone–none of which have been built. Moreover, during the last 5 years the number of beds available for admission of acutely ill and injured patients has continued to fall and we now have the lowest number of beds per capita in Europe and England has the lowest number within the UK.” …

“… This is the figure recorded at midnight—daytime occupancy rates frequently exceed 100% in many hospitals. Such occupancy levels mean there is no surge capacity, rendering hospitals hostage to fortune.” …

… “Whilst increasing bed capacity is not regarded as a viable option by the Nuffield Trust, their evidence identified further utilisation of capacity within the community as being a mechanism for easing pressure in acute trusts. They said that “investment in new rehabilitative ‘step-down’ beds, where patients can recover outside hospital, could deliver substantial gains”. It was therefore encouraging that the Minister said in evidence that as part of the process of developing sustainability and transformation plans:

“we will see the whole healthcare economy players look to develop a more integrated pathway and rehabilitation beds. Intermediate care beds, I am sure, will form part of that”.

During the seminar we held with national policy experts the point was made that there is often an emphasis on community rehabilitation beds to enable discharge from acute hospital. There is, however, less attention paid to the ‘step-up’ element of community provision which can prevent emergency attendance and admission. …”

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmhealth/277/27706.htm#_idTextAnchor027

Tiverton and Honiton Tory selections for Devon County Council seats

“We have now completed the selection of our candidates to stand for the Conservative Party at the Devon County Council elections in May 2017. The candidates are as follows:-

Axminster, Iain Chubb
Seaton and Colyton, Helen Parr
Feniton and Honiton, Phil Twiss
Whimple and Newbridges, Paul Diviani
Tiverton East, Colin Slade
Tiverton West, Polly Colthorpe
Willand and Uffculme, Ray Radford,
Cullompton and Bradnich, John Berry”

Government reject former Cabinet MP’s FoI request for report he commissioned!

“As Energy Secretary, he was a target for journalists wielding the Freedom of Information Act.

Now, after being ousted from Parliament in the May 2015 general election, Sir Ed Davey has been forced to resort to using the transparency legislation himself – in an attempt to read a report he commissioned.

But, in a dark twist, civil servants, who just 18 months ago worked with him, have rejected his FOI request asking them to publish a study on the true costs of different electricity sources.

The former Lib Dem cabinet member has accused the Government of “an abuse of power” after it rejected his FOI request to publish the Frontier Economics study into the true costs of different electricity sources, which was submitted to ministers by the consultancy at the start of this year.

Responding to Sir Ed’s requests, the Government acknowledged a public interest in publishing the report but said it would do so “in due course” when it could provide “sufficient context”.

“The excuse for this delay is clearly self-serving nonsense,” Sir Ed said. “It’s an independent report that can stand alone without any spin from Conservative ministers.”…

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/11/05/access-denied-government-rejects-sir-ed-daveys-request-for-energ/

Sidford employment land victim of “electioneering”

District council chiefs who voted to remove Sidford’s controversial 12-acre employment site from a strategic plan were in fact powerless to enforce the decision, a campaigner has been told.

Councillor Marianne Rixson last week questioned why – after the decision was made unanimously in March 2015 – officers were never instructed to submit a ‘flood of new evidence’ to put it into action. Despite the last-ditch vote to have it removed, a Government planning inspector later ruled the allocation must remain in East Devon District Council’s (EDDC) Local Plan.

The answer to Cllr Rixson’s question, given at last Wednesday’s full EDDC meeting, confirmed the instruction was never given to remove the allocation from the plan – because a public inquiry was already under way.

Members heard that officer advice would have been to allow the planning inspector, who led the inquiry, to ‘reach his own conclusions’.

Last week’s meeting heard: “Members’ resolution to remove the allocation from the plan was, and could only ever have been, a suggestion to the inspector as, following its submission for examination, the council no longer had the power to make changes to it.

“There was, therefore, no opportunity to submit evidence to support this change, however, even if there had been, the evidence produced up to that point had supported its allocation and it is likely that any future evidence would have reached the same conclusion.”

Cllr Rixson, a long-time campaigner against the allocation who was elected last May, said the Conservative-majority council only took the vote because it felt threatened by her and her East Devon Alliance colleagues.

She said: “The final comment [above] confirms our suspicions that EDDC never changed its mind about the Sidford site being in the Local Plan.

“Voting to ‘remove it’ was purely an electioneering stunt just before the district council elections in 2015.”

An application to develop the employment site into a 9.3-acre business park was refused in September, although EDDC bosses said they remain committed to its development.

Cllr Rixson added: “The recent refusal of the application to develop the site exposed significant planning policies that should have been considered when the Local Plan was being drawn up.

“The outstanding question is why they did not come to the fore when they could have made an impact on the Local Plan?”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/vote_to_remove_sidford_employment_site_electioneering_1_4761216

Report on health cuts public meeting in Seaton

“On the heels of yesterday’s successful meeting with nearly 300 people in Seaton Town Hall (I was too busy speaking and listening to take a picture!), Independent County Councillor Claire Wright has now linked to the CCG’s Sustainability and Transformation Plan from September which sets out the need for cuts, including, she says:

100s of more bed cuts to acute hospitals such as the RD&E

cuts to stroke, A&E, paediatrics, maternity, breast services, ENT, radiology, heart surgery and vascular surgery

Claire says, ‘It is more important than ever that our MPs back Sarah Wollaston and ask for more funding in the chancellor’s Autumn Statement.’ This is the point that Seaton Town Council also identified and which I put to Neil Parish MP yesterday. Parish accepted the point and said he will work for ‘more resources’, collaborating with Wollaston.

In response to a question from Paul Arnott of Colyton, former Chair of East Devon Alliance, Parish indicated that he would be prepared to vote against the Government on the Autumn Statement (23 Nov.) if there was no more funding for the NHS in Devon. Watch this space!

A troubling thing from yesterday’s meeting – Parish specifically asked Rebecca Harriott, CCG Chief Officer, if more funding would mean the community beds cuts would be reviewed: she refused to give that assurance.”

https://seatonmatters.org/

Black holes and green fields

Comment reproduced from post below:

The leaderships approach to finances over the last decade or more has been driven by a single-minded dogma to avoid any rise in council tax, even to match inflation. They have achieved this by relying not only on the government’s normal grant, but also on the government’s New Homes Bribe (ooops, Bonus – which gives payments for 6 years for each house built) which in turn has driven the mind-boggling growth numbers in the East Devon Local Plan which could easily see overall growth of more than 35% – YES THAT IS NOT A TYPO, I DO MEAN GROWTH OF HOMES OF MORE THAN A THIRD – over the period of the current Local Plan.

(Imagine all the buildings in East Devon – in Exmouth, Budleigh, Sidmouth, Seaton, Axminster, Honiton, etc. etc. – all lumped together – that’s a lot of land built on. Now take a third of that huge area, and imagine all the green fields in East Devon that will need to be built upon to make that happen, a lot of which will be in our AONBs. That is the EDDC Conservative vision for East Devon.)

Anyway, back to the finances. So EDDC’s future financial plans were predicated on large income from the New Homes Bonus. But George Osborne introduced an austerity regime which decided to abolish not only the normal grant but also the New Homes Bonus, so now the EDDC’s finances have a huge hole in them (made worse of course by the vanity projects they are undertaking like the no-longer-cost-neutral move from the Knowle).

And that is why we have seen a 4% increase in Council tax this year, and likely to see further increases in council tax way above inflation in the next few years.

Fortunately (????!!!!!), the government has thrown EDDC a lifeline by deciding to allow councils to keep all the local business rates as revenue – so we are now seeing EDDC allowing dubious business developments approved (like the recent Greendale application – submitted by a generous donor to the local Conservatives) and we should expect this to ramp up as the cash flow from the New Homes Bonus runs down.

Now back to the mental picture of 1/3 growth in homes – take the amount of land you have pictured for new homes, and add to it a significant growth in industrial buildings (like Sidford and Greendale). Terrifying isn’t it.

Of course, if you take have been watching EDDC’s actions, you will know that they have already rationalised this by joining (without any consultation with the public or indeed councillors) with Exeter City Council and Teignbridge District Council to form so called Greater Exeter. Think of Greater London and Greater Manchester and you will get the picture – huge sprawling joined up conurbations, with extensive suburbs to feed the businesses in the city centre. We are already seeing assaults on the green wedges that separate our towns and villages – so this is not as far from reality as you might think.

So there you have it. A double whammy – huge increases in Council Tax whilst rampant developments start to cover our beautiful countryside and Exeter grows exponentially in order to meet the huge Local Plan targets for new homes.

Auditors say EDDC “will continue to find it difficult to afford its spending plans against further government spending cuts” say auditors

“Going forward, the Council will continue to find it difficult to afford its spending plans against further government spending cuts, the added pressure of inflationary increases in costs and pay awards, continued low investment income, an increasing call on services, members’ ambitions to enhance and improve services and the wish to keep to moderate increases in Council Tax and other fees and charges.”

Click to access 220916-agenda-item-8-combined-reports.pdf

And no word yet if they have signed off last year’s accounts “after a formal objection was received from a local elector. We are in the process of considering this objection, which relates to the Council’s approach to recording and obtaining receipt of monies due to it from developers through agreements under s106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990.

Messy situation for the next meeting of the Audit and Governance Committee.

Swire’s was bigger than Alan Duncan’s … or was it?

Eton obviously gives some of its former pupils a very, very cruel and odd sense of humour. Here is a report from today’s Times Diary:

Sir Hugo Swire [Owl does not recognise croney titles but The Times does], the former Foreign Office Minister, was in a waspish mood at a Conservative Middle East Council reception this week.

First, he teased his successor Sir Alan Duncan, for being moved out of Sir Hugo’s former office, “Mine is larger” protested the 5 ft 6 in Sir Alan. “Everything looks bigger from your vantage point, Alam” [Sir] Hugo retorted.

He then apologised for the absence of [Sir] Nicholas Soames, who was defending grouse shooting in the Commons: “I suppose he fears that unless he puts in an appearance, the invitations might dry up”.

Ouch.”

Ha, ha, ha – so, so funny … if you are a 14-year-old at Eton …

EDDC isn’t like John Lewis (“Never knowingly undersold)!

Letter in today’s Sidmouth Herald:

Cllr Barlow rightly castigates the developers of the 36 Churchill homes for their measly offer towards affordable homes in the light of the profits likely to be made. How much more profit will PegasusLife make from 115 apartments at Knowle, but in this case without any payment at all towards affordable homes? What is more, EDDC have, I believe, “knowingly undersold” the site, including parts of the public park, to pay towards an unnecessary re-location, so that PegasusLife are likely, according to some estimates, to make a net profit of around £26 million. And because of the inadequate care to be provided, this development will very likely put great strain on already threatened local health services. Or does PegasusLife expect most of the apartments to become second homes for the extremely wealthy, as there is apparently nothing apart from cost to prevent this? Either way, is this what Sidmouth needs?

Readers may also like to know that, since they sent in their objections to the Knowle development, well over 50 new documents have been submitted by PegasusLife (in August and on 27 October). Some of these contradict earlier and misleading artist-impressions and show new details and changes including drainage problems upon which people may wish to comment. Comments should reach the planning department by November 11 as the application is likely to be put to the Development Management Committee on December 6.

Michael Temple Sidmouth

Ex-Chancellor breaks lobbying rules

“George Osborne has received a stern letter from the Government’s lobbying watchdog over his activities since being sacked by Theresa May.

The former chancellor initially failed to declare that he was setting up a Northern Powerhouse think-tank despite having launched the same policy as Chancellor.

The Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (ACOBA) was only told of Mr Osborne’s plans after they appeared in the press.

Former ministers are barred from lobbying the Government for two years after they leave office and “must seek advice from Acoba about any appointments or employment they wish to take up within two years of leaving office”.

The body however has no actual powers to sanction Mr Osborne for the late declaration.

In a letter to Mr Osborne, Acoba said: “The Committee would also remind you that advice should be sought on all appointments, paid or unpaid, before they are taken up or announced.”

Lib Dem leader Tim Farron said: “The Chancellor has been rapped over the knuckles for not following due process – having been in the government for the last few years he should know these rules and abide by them.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/george-osborne-rapped-by-governments-lobbying-watchdog-northern-powerhouse-a7389591.html

“Bus services reduce social deprivation”

“A 10% improvement in bus services would lead to almost 10,000 more people in work in the poorest neighbourhoods in England, says the study.
Published by sustainable transport group Greener Journeys, the report involved researchers from KPMG and the Institute for Transport Studies at Leeds university.

The Value of the Bus to Society study sought to investigate and quantify the impact of bus services on tackling social deprivation.

It found that a 10% improvement in local bus services is linked to a 3.6% reduction in social deprivation across England, taking into account employment, income, life expectancy and skills.

It concludes that a 10% improvement in local bus services in England’s 10% most deprived neighbourhoods would result in 9,909 more jobs.

The report says better bus services would mean 22,647 people with increased income, the result of a 2.8% drop in income deprivation. …”

http://www.rsnonline.org.uk/services/bus-services-reduce-social-deprivation

“Ministers on course to miss target of selling enough public land for 160,000 new homes by 2020”

“The Public Accounts Committee said the Government will have to order a “significant acceleration in the last years of the programme” to sell land for the remaining 149,000 homes still to be built, over the next three and a half years.

Officials in charge of the policy at the Department for Communities and Local Government had “taken their eye off the ball” before the last election, they said.

The MPs said the Government’s plans to build 160,000 new homes between 2015 and 2020 were “back-loaded, which increases the risk that government will not meet its commitment”.

The Government told the MPs that only enough land for 8,380 new homes – five per cent of the total – had been sold.

They said the “slow start to the new programme” was either because they “took their eye off the ball at the end of the previous programme that ran up to 2015 or are struggling to find suitable sites”.

Meg Hillier MP, chairman of the Public Accounts Committee, said: “There is a desperate need for new homes and public land is an irreplaceable asset.

“Taxpayers clearly have a right to know whether they are getting a good deal from its sale and how many homes are being built as a result.

“Sluggish sales have hindered progress towards the 2020 target while questions continue to hang over the potential of many sites earmarked for sale and whether homes will be in the places people want to live.

“Ultimately the public will judge the success of this programme on the basis of the homes built and the Government must make clear who taxpayers should hold to account for this.”

Earlier this year the Government was criticised after it emerged that officials were not required to keep track of whether new homes were actually being built on public land sold for housing.

It then emerged in January this year that only 1,800 new homes had built on public land out of the 109,000 promised by former Prime Minister David Cameron in 2011.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/02/ministers-on-course-to-miss-target-of-selling-enough-public-land/

Unitary councils “save money” … yet a few years ago – they didn’t!

Owl is confused.

A few years ago, EDDC spent more than £250,000 to persuade us – and the Government – that they should NOT be forced to amalgamate into, basically, a “Greater Exeter” OR a unitary authority.

NOW:

We have East Devon District Council

We have Devon County Council

We have Greater Exeter – EDDC, Mid-Devon, Teignbridge and Exeter Councils – the very thing EDDC fought only a few years ago

We have STRATA – an IT partnership between EDDC, Teignbridge and Exeter but NOT Mid-Devon

We have the Local Enterprise Partnership – all of Devon and all of Somerset

AND

Research apparently reveals that unitary councils could save several billion pounds:

Creating 27 unitary councils across the whole of England could save as much as £2.9bn, according to an independent analysis of local government reorganisation options undertaken for the County Councils Network.

The report by consultants EY examined six different single and two-tier governance scenarios for county and district authorities, using existing county boundaries. Based on the analysis of national data, EY found that creation of unitaries along county boundaries could save between £2.37bn and £2.86bn over five years, and average up to £106m per county. The single unitary option has the shortest payback period, generating savings within two years and two months, according to the review. …”

Owl’s head hurts…

Hernandez “unavailable” to comment on Devon and Cornwall policing crisis.

Spotlight reported tonight on a crisis in Devon and Cornwall Policing. A survey of police officers revealed an overstretched and underfunded force, demoralised and angry.

The Chief Constable was interviewed and he agreed that the force is in crisis and they need more police on the beat.

And where was our selfie-loving Police and Crime Commissioner?

“Unavailable for comment”.

Her Chief Executive, Andrew White was wheeled out instead and basically refused to say if more police officers would be or could be funded.

Funny how she turns up for publicity shots and disappears when anything turns up that isn’t just publicity …

RD and E on collision course with “Success Regime”

R D and E has recently taken over responsibility for the local community hospitals where the “Success Regime” plans to cut half the beds.

It seems that RD and E is totally out of synch with the “Success Regime” and is refusing to close beds BEFORE adequate social care provision is in place – well done R D and E!

Increasing patient demand on RD&E shown by 23 consecutive red alert days”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/increasing-patient-demand-on-rd-e-shown-by-23-consecutive-red-alert-days/story-29863017-detail/story.html

RD&E pledge not to remove community hospital beds until it is safe”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/rd-e-pledge-not-to-remove-community-hospital-beds-until-it-is-safe/story-29862481-detail/story.html

Swire busy in London on 16 November 2016 … but not for East Devon

Doubt many people from East Devon will be interested but a few members of the LEP might attend – particularly those with nuclear and weapons interests.

Claire Wright would almost certainly have been battling to save NHS beds in East Devon if she was our MP!

“Britain after Brexit Publication Drinks Reception”

Event to be held at the following time, date, and location:

Wednesday, November 16, 2016 from 5:30 PM to 7:00 PM (GMT)

Conservative Middle East Council
55 Tufton Street
SW1P 3QL London
United Kingdom

We are pleased to invite you to celebrate CMEC’s latest publication Britain after Brexit: old friendships and new opportunities in the Middle East

CMEC Chairman

The Rt Hon Sir Hugo Swire MP KCMG

will host the event and Crispin Blunt MP, Chair of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, and Kwasi Kwarteng MP, CMEC Vice Chairman, will offer brief remarks.

You can read the series of articles included in the publication on our website here:
https://cmec.org.uk/depth/news-analysis?page=1