EDDC: Can’t tell us what they did – because someone else did it for them and they have no paperwork!

THIS IS HOW EDDC DEALS WITH MANY OF OUR FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUESTS – A MASTERPIECE OF LAME EXCUSES, AVOIDANCE AND POSSIBLY WORSE.

The implication in the correspondence below raises serious questions.

1. EDDC does not appear to check what a third-party has done on its behalf.
2. It does not seem to ask for proof that the third party has done the work.
3. It seems to allow work that needs legal clearance to go ahead on the basis of 1 and 2 above with seemingly no proof that it IS legal.

FIRST YOU MAKE A CLEAR REQUEST:

Dear East Devon District Council,

“Following Cllr Moulding’s statement of today’s date (28.09.16) on BBC Radio Devon, that EDDC had ‘used a badger expert, and applied for the relevant license from Natural England’, in respect of the badgers identified as living on the site of the Jungle Fun and Crazy Golf, on The Queen’s Drive, Exmouth, I would like to request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and Environmental Information Regulations 2004, the following additional information:

1. When were badgers first identified as living on the Jungle Fun and crazy golf site?
2. On what date was the ‘badger expert’, Dr. Brown, enlisted by EDDC in respect of the badgers on the Jungle fun and crazy golf site, and what was his brief?
3 – Please provide Dr. Brown’s report pertaining to the badgers on the Jungle Fun and crazy golf site in full.
4. On what date was a license to interfere with a sett applied for with Natural England?
5. Please provide full details of the application made (the original application form and all attached material, and any relevant communications).
6. On what date, if at all, was this license granted?
7. Following the Radio Devon report in which it was stated permission had been given to move the badgers to a new site, please confirm that date on which that has, or will, happen, and any related documentation.

Yours faithfully,”

THEN EDDC GIVES YOU A REPLY ON SOME POINTS – WITH CRUCIAL INFORMATION MISSING ON THE REST – THIS TIME SAYING IT IS BECAUSE ANOTHER ORGANISATION MADE THE APPLICATION ON THEIR BEHALF AND THEY HAVEN’T SEEN WHAT THAT ORGANISATION ASKED FOR OR THE LICENCE THAT ORGANISATION SAYS IT GOT FOR THEM:

[Points 1-3 are answered]

… In respect of parts (4-7) of your request, the application was made on behalf of the council and we do not hold a copy of the application or
licence itself
.”

SO YOU ASK AGAIN – ANOTHER DELAY FOR UP TO 20 DAYS TILL THEY REPLY

“I would like to further request under the FOI act 200 and Environmental Regulations Act 2004:

1 – Who made the application of behalf of the Council.
2 – On what date did they make this application.
3 – As the requested application was made on behalf of the Council I would like to re-request a copy of the original application, as I believe this is ‘information held by another person on behalf of the authority’, which as stated in the ICO report (https://ico.org.uk/media/1148/informatio… ) , is held for the purposes of the FOI act.”

A smell of badger poo somewhere?

Public toilets next for the chop in East Devon asks EDA councillor?

“Fears have been voiced for Sidmouth’s free public toilets as district bosses review their £800,000 cost in a bid to balance the books.

East Devon District Council (EDDC) is taking stock of its conveniences and is looking into paid access at some ‘key’ sites, leasing some to businesses and ‘innovative’ ways of reducing the cost of providing its StreetScene service.

Also on the cards is ‘rationalising’ its provision, but the authority insists that no decision has yet been made and residents will be consulted. Any changes are at least two years away, says the council.

Councillor Cathy Gardner, ward member for Sidmouth Town, said the result will be taxpayers paying more for less – and warned the authority will soon run out of ways to cut costs.

“A town like Sidmouth needs free public toilets,” she said. “An elderly population and lots of visitors with children need them, otherwise we have an increase in urination in public places.

“As well as cutting services that we’ve had as a mark of civilisation since the Victorian era, we will be paying more in council tax and getting less.

“This is what austerity means at a local level. It really does affect everyone and I doubt whether things will ever be put back.

“Once an asset is sold, it’s gone – never to be returned – and how do you balance the books next time?”

An EDDC spokeswoman said: “The council recognises that public toilet provision is a very important service for our residents and visitors – however, it is not a statutory service and we provide it because we know how much it is valued.

“As part of the council plan, we need to look at ways of operating services differently in order to help meet our budget deficit of £2.6million.

“We spend around £800,000 per annum on our toilets, so we need to assess them responsibly for quality, level of provision in any given area and possible options for different ways of operating.

“However, we would like to stress that no decisions have yet been made – it is far too early and is still a work in progress.”

The spokeswoman said the provision is being reviewed and the options will be discussed by EDDC’s asset management forum and cabinet. She added: “As and when proposals come forward, there will be full engagement, including consultation, with all interested parties.

“We anticipate that any changes would not come into place for at least two years.”

http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/cathy-gardner/20161027/sidmouth-herald-concern-public-toilets-across-east-devon/

EDDC’s knuckles thrashed three times by Information Commissioner

From Save our Sidmouth website today. Coruscating condemnation of their secrecy over Knowle relocation.

“Knowle relocation project: BREAKING NEW

Information Commissioner tells East Devon District Council to publish documentation

News just in that the ICO have released three Decision Notices. They will be available on their website shortly:

https://search.ico.org.uk/ico/search/decisionnotice

Meanwhile, here is an overview:

Case: FER0626901
Pegasus agreement re Knowle

The ICO are telling EDDC to come up with all of this:

“I would like the Council to disclose the details of the agreement it has entered into with Pegasus for the Knowle site.
I would like to see the full, unredacted version of the agreement.
I understand that the information at issue would not be exploited by a competitor and that disclosure would not place either party at a commercial disadvantage.
All parties, including Pegasus, will have known that they would be subject to the FOIA when the agreement was signed.
To reiterate, I would like the full publication of the commercial terms of the agreement.
I would like you to provide me with all of the documentation I have requested: in their original electronic versions and not in their scanned versions.”

From: Pegasus agreement re Knowle – a Freedom of Information request to East Devon District Council – WhatDoTheyKnow

Case: FER0608237
Projected maintenance costs for relocation project

The ICO say EDDC don’t have to produce spreadsheets but have to publish the following re the new-build at Honiton:

“To disclose the price that the developer is prepared to pay for the land from the cash flow documents which the council withheld.”

The ‘Conclusions’ are interesting, however:

“53. There is a public interest in protecting the public purse, in this case this is balanced in this case against the public interest in allowing the public to scrutinise the council’s decisions and financial assumptions about the project to develop new offices for itself. This latter aspect clearly raises the level of transparency which would be expected as the council could be seen to be spending public money on its own facilities, for its own purposes. It has argued that it needs to change offices as overall, doing so would save the public money compared to staying in its current offices. The public however cannot know whether this is true without further information being open for them to scrutinise.”

With ref to:
Projected maintenance costs for relocation project – a Freedom of Information request to East Devon District Council – WhatDoTheyKnow

Case: FER0623403
Decision process which led to the award of the conditional contract with Pegasus re Knowle

The ICO are telling EDDC to come up with the last from this list – EDDC having given the first 5, but not the 6th:

“I request information on the decision to award a contract to PegasusLife for the development of the Knowle site in Sidmouth, including, but not limited to:
1. Bid documentation provided to prospective bidders;
2. process for and criteria for selection of successful bidder;
3. Number of organisations who expressed an interest in bidding;
4. Number of organisations who submitted a bid;
5. Names of organisations who submitted a bid;
6. Minutes of meetings and correspondence on the subject.”

From:
Decision process which led to the award of the conditional contract with Pegasus re Knowle – a Freedom of Information request to East Devon District Council – WhatDoTheyKnow

Politics Iceland style – Pirate Party poised for victory

“A party that favours direct democracy, complete government transparency, decriminalising drugs and offering asylum to Edward Snowden could form the next government in Iceland after the country goes to the polls on Saturday.

Riding a wave of public anger at perceived political corruption in the wake of the 2008 financial crash and the Panama Papers scandal in April, Iceland’s Pirate party looks on course to either win or finish a close second.

The radical party, founded by activists and hackers four years ago as part of an international anti-copyright movement, captured 5% of the vote in 2013 elections, winning three seats in Iceland’s 63-member parliament, the Althingi.

This time around, analysts say it could win between 18 and 20 seats. This would put it in pole position to form a government at the head of a broad progressive alliance of up to five parties currently in opposition.

The party’s leader and figurehead is Birgitta Jónsdóttir, a 49-year-old feminist MP, poet, artist and former WikiLeaks collaborator. Jónsdóttir says she has no ambition to be prime minister, pointing to the Pirate party’s horizontal structure. Rather, she wants to sweep away what she sees as Iceland’s dysfunctional system.

“People in Iceland are sick of corruption and nepotism,” she has said. She likens Iceland to a chilly North Atlantic version of Sicily, ruled by a few “mafia-style families” plus their friends, whom she nicknames “the Octopus”.

Of her political movement, she says: “We do not define ourselves as left or right but rather as a party that focuses on the systems. In other words, we consider ourselves hackers – so to speak – of our current outdated systems of government.”

This anti-establishment message has resonated with large swaths of Iceland’s 320,000-strong population, especially the young. On Monday Jónsdóttir and two party colleagues took part in an AMA, or “ask me anything”, on Reddit. Their wide-ranging discussion covered the EU (the Pirates would put Iceland’s membership application to a referendum), fishing quotas, whaling, climate change and the party’s name.

“We’re called the Pirate party in reference to a global movement of Pirate parties that popped up over the last decade,” parliamentary candidate Smári McCarthy explained. “Despite our name, we’re taken fairly seriously in Iceland, in particular because of our very aggressive anti-corruption stance, [and] our pro-transparency work.” …

… All too often in Icelandic politics, the party says, electoral pledges are reneged on after elections, with “the parties forming a government … hiding behind compromises in coalition – enabling them to cheat voters again and again”.

Saturday’s election was prompted by the resignation of Iceland’s prime minister Sigmundur Davið Gunnlaugsson. He became the first major casualty of the Panama Papers in April after the leaked legal documents revealed he and his wife had millions of pounds of family money offshore. Gunnlaugsson hadn’t declared the British Virgin Islands company.

This was not illegal, but the news sparked outrage and some of the largest protests that Iceland has ever seen. The ruling coalition replaced Gunnlaugsson with the agriculture and fisheries minister Sigurður Ingi Jóhannsson and promised elections before the end of this year.

Gunnlaugsson’s Progressive party is now languishing at about 8% in the polls, barely a third of its score in the 2013 elections. Support for the Independence party, the Pirates’ rival for the position of largest party, seems to be holding. …

… Built on the belief that new technologies can help promote civic engagement and government transparency and accountability, the Pirates also advocate an “unlimited right” for citizens to be involved in political decision-making. It wants voters to be able to propose new legislation and decide on it in national referendums.

The Pirate party is part of a global anti-establishment trend typified by parties on the left such as Syriza in Greece and Podemos in Spain, and on the right such as Germany’s AfD and Britain’s Ukip. As well as promising to accept Bitcoin as legal tender, Iceland’s Pirates have pledged to maintain the country’s economic stability. …

… Unlike some other anti-establishment parties, the Pirates have made clear they have no intention of doing anything likely to upset the economy. Analysts say there is little panic at the prospect of the radical party entering government.

“Across Europe, increasingly many people think that the system that is supposed to look after them is not doing it any more,” Jónsdóttir said. “But we know we are new to this, and it is important that we are extra careful and extra critical of ourselves to not take too much on.”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/26/iceland-election-could-propel-radical-pirate-party-into-power

FWS Carter and Greendale Business Park – trees, who cares?

East Devon District Council has moved to prevent more trees being felled at a business park near Woodbury Salterton.

“A tree preservation order has been made after concerns were raised about trees being removed at Greendale Business Park, off the A3052.

It comes as owner FWS Carter & Sons Ltd is set to appeal against the council’s refusal of planning permission for an extended compound, warehouse and office building on the eastern edge of the site.

Groundworks on the scheme, including the removal of some trees, started in March last year, before a planning application was submitted in November.

Planning consent was refused by East Devon District Council in July this year.

Earlier this month, the council confirmed a tree preservation order to safeguard the remaining trees on the eastern side of the business park.

The trees were planted some years ago to provide screening to mitigate the impact of the industrial estate on the surrounding rural area.

Councillor Geoff Jung, the local ward member on the district council, claims between 300 and 450 trees have been removed – but the developer says only 50 have been cleared.

Georgina Turner, owner of the nearby Brooklands Caravan Park, which overlooks the site, said: “It’s affecting my house as well as my livelihood.

“When we bought this place 18 months ago, the holiday park was protected from the industrial estate by this thick band of trees, so you couldn’t hear it or see it.

“Since they removed the trees, people coming here on holiday have commented on the noise. It has put some people off. People want to go on holiday somewhere peaceful and quiet.

“Even if they were to replant the trees, it will take another 15 years for them to grow, so it’s not going to be an immediate solution.”

Councillor Jung said: “These trees were specifically planted to act as a semi natural screen to help shield the industrial area from the open countryside and local residential properties.

“We will have to start again and await further planting and years of continual growth to replicate what has been ripped out.”

The planning officer’s report notes that works have been ongoing on the site, where a concrete compound and light commercial unit have been constructed.

FWS Carter & Sons has said around 30 jobs are associated with the new development.

Director Alec Carter said: “Greendale Business Park is a major employment site in East Devon, supporting over 1,300 jobs and contributing well over £16 million to the local economy each year.

“The planning application in question was submitted in November 2015 with a target date for determination in February 2016. The application was not considered until eight months after it was lodged.

“The refusal of the application was surprising given that the majority of the site in question had previously been granted planning consent for a large 1,661 square metre office building.

“The business occupying the site employs 30 people and is predominantly using the area for open storage. A small 120 square metre warehouse is also on the site.

“A planning appeal is being lodged with the Planning Inspectorate against the refusal of the planning application. Two detailed planning applications are also being re-submitted to East Devon District Council.

“Around 50 young trees were removed to accommodate the business site and a number have been replanted on the boundary of the proposed development. The trees were not covered by a Tree Protection Order and their removal is not in breach of Forestry Commission regulations, who were notified at the time.”

The developer has agreed to repay part of a grant from the Forestry Commission which was used to fund the original planting.

It added that over the last 15 years, around 23,000 trees covering 21 hectares have been planted around Greendale Business Park.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/council-order-to-halt-removal-of-trees-at-east-devon-business-park/story-29844134-detail/story.html

Where do we get the important local news? Not in the Midweek Herald!

This week’s Archant (Honiton) Midweek Herald.

Bearing in mind the quote yesterday that “Journalism ask the questions people don’t want to answer, otherwise it is PR”, this week’s Midweek Herald is pure PR.

One short letter about losing community hospitals, a front page lead story on rent hikes for Honiton Rugby Club, with no coverage of the rent hikes at ALL sports facilities on EDDC land throughout the district, then mostly lots of pre-packaged press releases from local sources. Of course, with the weekly mention of the Thelma Hulbert Gallery.

NOTHING on the district’s fight to keep hospital beds open.
NOTHING on Hugo Swire’s parliamentary debate about local health services last week.
NOTHING about their MP Neil Parish’s view on the situation.

Journalism? Awkward questions? Not on your life. No boat-rocking, move along here, nothing to see, that’s just a tiny iceberg in front of us, nothing worry about … oh, look, kittens!

Interesting thoughts on post-Brexit devolution in England

“Uncertainty surrounded firm devolution plans for some areas before Brexit. But what about now? This timely post gives a useful update on what we can expect next on the big issue for our regions.

By PANEL WRITER Will Mapplebeck

Back in June, just before the Brexit vote, I wrote a blog post for comms2point0.co.uk called Eight Things You Always Wanted to Know About Devolution But Were Afraid to Ask. Given that quite a lot has happened since then, I thought it might be worth an update.

1. It’s not going anywhere

Despite some ‘wobbles’ at the start of Theresa May’s premiership when it appeared the policy of having directly elected mayors might be ditched, it appears that devolution is still a ‘big deal’ for Theresa May’s Government. The elected mayor elections are still on (see point 5) and the Government is still talking to and encouraging applications from groups of local authorities for devolved powers.

2. A new buzz phrase – inclusive growth

Back in June, I pointed to the fact that devolution had a strong economic case behind it, but that the social aspects were growing in importance. This is the idea that you can’t really create growth if you leave people behind as this actively damages the economy. This policy direction towards inclusive growth – making sure everyone shares in the proceeds – has continued, perhaps driven by Theresa May’s surprising play for the centre ground in her first speech as PM. The key message from Core Cities UK and others – see the RSA’s Inclusive Growth Commission interim report – is that inclusive growth can only happen at a local level, and will only happen when places are given more freedoms and powers.

3. Brexit changed everything… and nothing

The biggest decision in post war British politics was bound to cause a few high profile casualties, but so far the idea of more power to place has not been one. In fact, there’s wide acceptance that the reasons behind people voting to leave was partly due to a sense of alienation from mainstream politics and a feeling of helplessness in the face of global economic forces. People wanted to ‘take back control’ and devolving powers to local level gives them a chance to do that. There’s also a general cross-party understanding that, whatever the outcome of Brexit, our cities and other places remain relatively underpowered compared to their European Counterparts and our country is one of the most over centralised in the World.

4. Move over Northern Powerhouse, there’s a new slogan in town

While at Conservative Party Conference in Birmingham, I couldn’t help noticing that Midlands Engine was everywhere – the subject of numerous fringe programmes and receptions. Last year, in Manchester it was another slogan that sounds like a bad gay nightclub, Northern Powerhouse. Make no mistake, the powerhouse isn’t dead, despite being tied strongly to former Chancellor George Osbourne, but the Midlands Engine is the slogan of choice in various parts of Government at the moment.

5. The Metro mayors are coming

Metro mayor candidates are now lining up for battle in May, don’t under-estimate how visible they will become when they are elected in Merseyside, Greater Manchester, Tees Valley and the West Midlands (South Yorkshire’s mayor is still the subject of debate at time of writing). Metro Mayors will make sure they become the go-to for media comment and they’ll be full of ideas to raise their public profile, proving they are actually doing something. Expect new mayors to zero in on issues like transport and housing, everyday things that make a difference to voters. Interestingly, there are no high profile independent candidates, the idea of a ‘celebrity’ mayor like Terry Christian or Alan Shearer doesn’t seem to have materialised.

6. Cities still at the heart, but other places need some love as well

One big criticism of the devolution agenda that it was all about cities, big cities. I work for Core Cities UK, so I’m a little bit biased on this point. For us, the economic evidence is clear – they are the country’s economic driver and given more freedoms – like their European counterparts – and they will do far more for UK Plc. But Theresa May has signalled that other, smaller, places are important too.

7. Not everywhere got a deal… or a mayor

George Osborne would have liked mayors to cover all the big cities, but political infighting and suspicion of the Government’s agenda put paid to that. Some big areas, notably the North East and West Yorkshire, ended up with nothing at all although talks still continue. Devolution is about more than just mayors, but the Government has stayed true to the original idea that if you want the best deal, you need to accept the idea of a mayor.

8. Remember, it’s still all about the people

I’m going to say it again, at the end of the day all this policy theorising and political manoeuvring comes down to people. People’s services, homes, jobs and lives. If you want to communicate it well, think about the difference it will make and what will actually change in terms of everyday life.”

http://comms2point0.co.uk/comms2point0/2016/10/24/8-things-you-still-need-to-know-about-devolution-and-are-still-afraid-to-ask

Exmouth Splat – how do we get from here to there?

Freedom of Information request and (non) answer


[Exmouth] Watersports centre
Date submitted: 18 October 2016
Summary of request

“Please can you tell me, how will the proposed watersports centre on Exmouth seafront gain access to the sea?

Will there be a water channel bulldozed across the beach from where the existing road is right up to the waters edge?

Will the proposal effectively slice the beach into two sections separated by water?

What engineering assessment has been prepared of the effects of any such channel or watery access on the currents, wave action and ensuing changes to sediment/sand erosions and depositions?

Summary of response

No formal planning application has been received for the development you refer to and no information is currently held which provides answers to the questions you have raised.”

Date responded: 19 October 2016

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/access-to-information/freedom-of-information/freedom-of-information-published-requests/

Scrutiny Committee scrutinises Police and Crime Commissioner – sort of, maybe

“Police and Crime Commissioner (pages 12 – 13)
The PCC, Alison Hernandez, will give a brief outline of her work since her election and respond to the questions submitted in advance (contained in the agenda papers) as well as answer questions put at the meeting.

[Owl is not quite sure why most questions seem to be about Exmouth]

… Questions put in advance to Police and Crime Commissioner for response on 3 November 2016

Bill Nash
EDDC Councillor for Exmouth Town Ward

Q1 What more can be done to overcome the extreme disturbance from Boy/Girl Racers in both cars & motor bikes?

The local Exmouth police monitored one of the five roads for speed where residents were being disturbed and woken at night. They concluded “that the results recommend no further action by enforcement or regulatory bodies “. Excessive noise is being caused by anti-social driving. What can be done?

Q2 Why is there not visible policing in Exmouth particularly at night? During the day there are very few PCSO’s visible.

Q3 Is Exmouth police station due to be closed completely as proposed in 2015? For a town of 38,000 rising to 50,000 in summer months a police presence should be available with public access – not just ” phone 101 “.

Alan Dent
Vice Chairman of Scrutiny Committee

Q4 What guarantee is there for our PCSOs to continue in employment?

Q5 What improvements have been made to the 101 service?

Richard Scott
Exmouth Town Councillor

Q6 I would like to know if Alison Hernandez is aware of the roadshow we held at Exmouth and if so could she explain what her office intends to do about one of the largest complaints, notably girl and boy racers on the seafront and the main thoroughfares from the sea front such as Carlton Hill, where speeds of double the speed limit are commonplace through residential streets?

Q7 Also could she explain why her office needs a head count of 20.3 and expenditure of 1.4 million, could this money and heads be better spent and used out on the streets of Devon and Cornwall?

Councillor Bruce de Saram Councillor for Exmouth Town Ward

Q8 Does the Police Commissioner agreed that one of the Licensing objectives is the Prevention of crime and disorder in which the Police are regarded as being the Lead Agency in implementing this strategy? Can you please confirm that Exmouth will definitely receive adequate support from the PCSO’s on the beat to achieve this objective so that the Police logs will clearly show when they are called out to deal with a licensing issue. This is because there has been confusion around this issue due to a lack of Police resources to attend and log the problem.”

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/media/1901200/031116-scrutiny-agenda-combined.pdf

More detail on Chief Constable conduct complaint

The complaint which led to an investigation into the conduct of Devon & Cornwall’s chief constable was made by defeated Devon Liberal Democrat MP Adrian Sanders, it has emerged.

Shaun Sawyer, the chief constable of Devon & Cornwall Police, has been placed under investigation for comments he made during an interview with the BBC – but denies any wrongdoing.

The investigation relates to comments about an inquiry into the declaration of general election expenses by Devon and Cornwall’s Police and Crime Commissioner Alison Hernandez.

Mrs Hernandez is currently being investigated following a complaint about alleged false accounting, relating to her role as the Conservative Party election agent in Torbay in May last year.

It was at the General Election that sitting Liberal Democrat MP Mr Sanders lost out to Conservative Kevin Foster, and Mrs Hernandez was the Tories’ election agent. She was elected as PCC in May this year.

In an interview with the BBC about the inquiry into Ms Hernandez, Mr Sawyer said that although “democracy is important” Parliament needed to consider procedures for dealing with complaints about the way elections are run.

He said: “This is taking up police time.

“It is taxpayers’ money.”

Mr Sawyer said in a statement on Tuesday: “I am aware that the OPCC (Office for the Police and Crime Commissioner) has received a complaint from a member of the public concerning comments I made in the course of a BBC interview regarding a police investigation into the Police and Crime Commissioner, Alison Hernandez.

“This complaint has been considered by the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission) and remitted back to the OPCC for resolution.

“I welcome an independent investigation into this complaint and look forward to hearing the outcome in due course.”

Gloucestershire Police has been brought in to carry out the investigation into Mr Sawyer, according to BBC Devon.

Read more: VIDEO – 89-year old Phyllis says next sting could be fatal in Bickleigh home wasp invasion battle

Mr Sanders welcomed the probe. He said: “You can’t make statements like that unless you have some background detail.

“He’s not in a position to know that detail, especially when it’s his boss who is the subject of investigation.”

The Devon & Cornwall force is investigating claims of false election expenses accounting by the Conservative Party at last year’s General Election.

In May this year magistrates approved an application from Devon & Cornwall Police to investigate four South West MPs, and the newly elected Police and Crime Commissioner Ms Hernandez.

Because the investigation included Ms Hernandez, Devon & Cornwall chief constable Shaun Sawyer asked the West Mercia Constabulary to conduct inquiries on his behalf.

The inquiry is now being handled by the IPCC and is expected to be concluded by November.

Ms Hernandez denies any wrongdoing and has said she is ready to help with any inquiries.

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/defeated-mp-made-complaint-against-devon-cornwall-chief-constable/story-29838762-detail/story.html

“Journalism is finding out what someone else doesn’t want you to know – everything else is public relations

Mid-Devon is one of the four councils that makes up the secretive “Greater Exeter”.

“THEY say that journalism is finding out what someone else doesn’t want you to know – everything else is public relations, writes Katie French.

This week especially that distinction has felt rather relevant.

With the news that two prominent councillors had been removed from their high-profile positions at Mid Devon District Council, it was important to find out why.

But how can a reporter get to the bottom of a story when those involved are not speaking to you?

This paper is regularly inundated with requests from the council for photo opportunities and self-congratulatory coverage but in the last seven days, the phones have been nigh on silent.

In a quest to get to the bottom of the Tiverton Portas Company investigation, repeated attempts have been made to contact councillors Sue Griggs and Neal Davey.

Neither has answered calls nor responded to emails.

This would all be very well if they hadn’t chosen a life in public office. But when you begin to take an allowance from the taxpayer to stand as a councillor, your decisions as a public servant open you up to a reasonable expectation of scrutiny.

Through their roles at the Tiverton Portas Company – Cllr Griggs as chair and Cllr Davey as secretary – the pair have become the trusted faces responsible for the £100,000 of government money supplied to improve the town.

Both have enjoyed ample column inches celebrating their successes. Yet when asked to comment on this investigation they have been silent.

This refusal to respond to reasonable requests has infuriated the chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance.

John O’Connell said: “Local residents will be incensed. This repeated refusal to speak to reporters shows a shocking contempt for scrutiny and transparency.

“The individuals responsible must be held to account. This is an utter disgrace and the council needs to sort it out without delay.”

But the councillors are not the only ones who have been difficult to reach.

Mid Devon District Council carried out the investigation into the Tiverton Portas Company after a complaint was made by a member of the public.

Numerous sources told this paper that a deficit of £18,000 had been discovered. That claim turned out to be unfounded but had the findings of the investigation – as presented to the standards committee on October 6 – been held in public, the claim would have had no credibility in the first place.

This increasing trend for public-funded bodies to attend to matters in private is not good for anyone – and it is not good enough.

As taxpayers we have a right to learn how our money is spent. Press and public should stand together and challenge unreasonable attempts to keep private matters relating to the taxpayer’s purse.

Next week a meeting will be held at Tiverton Town Council to discuss the findings of Mid Devon District Council’s audit.

It has been hinted that it will be held in chambers – meaning the press and public will be excluded.

This is not acceptable and the Gazette will be challenging the motion.

After all – if it is deliberately being held away from a reporter it’s likely there is going to be something worth hearing.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/public-servants-have-an-obligation-to-keep-us-informed-comment/story-29838892-detail/story.html

Devon and Cornwall Chief Constable AND Crime Commissioner both under investigation in election expenses scandal

The chief constable of Devon and Cornwall has been placed under police investigation over his conduct, the BBC has learnt.

It is in relation to comments Shaun Sawyer (pictured) made about the inquiry into the declaration of general election expenses by his Police and Crime Commissioner, Alison Hernandez. Gloucestershire Police have been brought in to carry out the investigation into Mr Sawyer.

Both he and Ms Hernandez both deny any wrongdoing.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-england-devon-37697575
(BBC Devon live-news 09.00 am)

Big NHS changes demo in Barnstaple

Hundreds of people have attended a march in opposition to proposed cuts in services at a hospital.

The Devon Sees Red march, held in Barnstaple, was to highlight concerns over potential cuts at North Devon District Hospital.

A document leaked to the BBC showed that stroke, maternity and neo-natal provision could feature in cost-cutting plans.
The hospital said “no decisions” have been made about the future of services.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-37740026

But, of course, a series of “preferred options” have been chosen. Amounts to the same thing these days.

“Come and meet Sir Hugo Swire MP on 29th Oct and Speak Up for the climate”

From Christian Aid – Ottery St Mary

“Dear friends,

Here are two important items of news that we thought you might like to know about concerning Ottery – an informal talk with Sir Hugo Swire at the next Community Market (29th October) and the latest update from campaigners regarding the proposed mineral extraction at Straitgate:

Informal conversation with Sir Hugo Swire MP, 11am on Sat 29th October in

The Institute, Yonder St, Ottery St Mary

Do you feel passionate about protecting all that we love from climate change? Do you want to see our elected MP Sir Hugo Swire take action on this issue? If your answer is yes, please come to an informal conversation with Sir Hugo Swire MP over a cup of tea/coffee and the WI’s fabulous cakes at
11am on Saturday 29th October in The Institute, Yonder St, Ottery – and visit Ottery’s dynamic Community Market at the same time. All are welcome!

The conversation with Sir Hugo has been organised by Christian Aid and is supported by the local branch of the Women’s Institute, Ottery St Mary United Reformed Church, and Sustainable Ottery. It is part of the national Speak Up for the Climate week of action promoted by The Climate Coalition:

http://www.theclimatecoalition.org

Officially the national week of action finished last Saturday with nearly 300 events taking place with local MPs all over the UK. Prime Minister Theresa May and Chancellor Philip Hammond were among the MPs who participated in local constituency events. A very constructive meeting was
also held with Ben Bradshaw MP in Exeter. In Ottery we thought it would be good to wait till our monthly Community Market (organised by the United Reformed Church) which typifies Ottery’s community spirit, our support for local produce and crafts, and our commitment to more sustainable shopping and living.

There is no strict agenda for this event. Christian Aid will briefly kick things off and ask Sir Hugo to press his government to draw up a national plan for reducing carbon emissions (in line with the Climate Change Act) –
as this is what The Climate Coalition has been calling for throughout the week of action nationally. After that, we will all be free to share with Sir Hugo our personal reasons for taking climate change seriously – and what we would like him to do about it, both locally and nationally. Some of us will be moved by the impact of climate change on the world’s poorest communities.

Others may want to talk about the impact on bees and other wildlife, our coastline, our farming, or our health. Some of us may be worried about floods in Ottery; others may be excited about the opportunities to scale up renewable energy or to promote cycling and cleaner transport. Whatever
climate change means for you, come and share it with your local MP on 29th October.

This is the start of a conversation with Sir Hugo which we hope will be ongoing over the coming years. And by the way, no technical knowledge of climate change science is required! If you know you can come, please contact
Helen Collinson:

helen.hcollinson90.freeserve.co.uk

(mob 0790 394 7782)

and please mention to her any issues or questions broadly related to climate change which you’d particularly like to raise with Sir Hugo. Alternatively, feel free to just turn up on the day!”

EDDC spends more than £ 700,000 on external legal advice in 3 years

Summary of request

I would like to know the amount of money the department spent on the services of external law firms and barristers for each of the last three years (years ending March 31). If this is not possible within the restrictions of the Freedom of Information Act, two years of data will suffice.

Summary of response

2013/14 Legal fees including barristers £285,075.61
2014/15 Legal fees including barristers £353,060.78
2015/16 Legal fees including barristers £79,053.34

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/access-to-information/freedom-of-information/freedom-of-information-published-requests/

3 or maybe 4 or maybe 7 organisations and 2 or maybe 5 individuals decided how to spend £82,000 S106 in Seaton – you work it out!

Except when you read the answer to this FoI request, it is SO contradictory!

It says in one part 2 individuals and 7 organisations responded, then it says 5 individuals and 4 organisations responded – and then it names only 3 organisations!

Whatever – it was a couple of individuals, the town council and 2 sports clubs that made the decision. That’s public consultation EDDC style!

Section 106 publicising for Seaton in 2014

Date submitted: 27 September 2016

Summary of request

On your website you state:

‘In 2014 we gathered in ideas from the community on how £82,000 of section 106 money from new homes in Seaton should be spent. We received nine eligible, affordable and possible ideas from the community and from sporting organisations.’

I would be grateful if you would detail:

1. How the community were asked for ideas?
2. What organisations were asked for ideas?
3. How organisations were asked for ideas?
4. How many individuals responded?
5. How many organisations responded?
6. Of the nine eligible ideas, how many were from individuals and how many from organisations/representatives of organisations?
7. The names of the organisations whose ideas were deemed eligible
Summary of response

1. How the community were asked for ideas? – Through press releases sent out to all media contacts; through social media and the councils website; local Councillors and Seaton Town Council were involved and were asked to publicise the opportunity. Also e-mails were sent to several relevant local organisations we were aware of, we asked them to publicise the opportunity
2. What organisations were asked for ideas? – We do not have a record of this
3. How organisations were asked for ideas? – See answer to question 1
4. How many individuals responded? – 2
5. How many organisations responded? – 7
6. Of the nine eligible ideas, how many were from individuals and how many from organisations/representatives of organisations? – 5 were from individuals and 4 from organisations/representatives of organisations
7. The names of the organisations whose ideas were deemed eligible – Seaton Town Council; Seaton Cricket Club; Axe Valley Runners
Date responded: 4 October 2016

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/access-to-information/freedom-of-information/freedom-of-information-published-requests/

How long do our MPs actually sit in the House of Commons?

Answer: not long at all. And MPs have no obligation to attend any sittings unless they are whipped to do so.

Mondays 2.30-10.30pm

Tuesdays and Wednesdays 11.30am-7.30pm

Thursdays 9.30am-5.30pm

Sitting Fridays 9.30am-3pm
(There are only 13 “sitting Fridays” in this Parliament)

Commons Hansard: Sittings of the House

http://www.parliament.uk/about/faqs/house-of-commons-faqs/business-faq-page/

MPs (such as Neil Parish) who sit on committees have slightly more work, though his committee has no current scheduled meetings arranged:

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/environment-food-and-rural-affairs-committee/

If you want to see exactly what is happening day by day here is the daily diary of Parliamentary activities:

http://calendar.parliament.uk/

The website of the Conservative Middle East Council, of which Hugo Swire is Chairman, does not give details of its meetings:

https://cmec.org.uk/

Oh, oh – Government says we have to have an elected Mayor!

Must be a credible figure … now, THAT is going to take some finding! From Devon or Somerset? Career councillor or business person? Nuclear interests or not? LEP member or not? Brexiter or not? Developer or not? Ruralist or Urbanist? And where is DCC, Greater Exeter and EDDC in all this? …

AND Sajid Javid manages to disparage tourism and older people in one paragraph.

“Ambitious devolution plans for Devon and Somerset need an elected mayor, the region’s economic leaders have been warned. Sajid Javid, secretary of state for communities and local government said there has to be a credible figurehead for economic growth for the Government to be prepared to hand over powers for investment, transport and infrastructure.

He made the stark statement at the South West Growth Summit, a major meeting of business leaders, politicians and academics from across all sectors in the South West.

The assertion comes as all 17 Devon and Somerset councils reach a critical stage in their bid for devolved powers – and the sticking point is the need for an elected mayor.

Mr Javid said that only an elected mayor could bring the kind of ambitions devolution that the region is calling for. To a packed Reed Hall at the University of Exeter, the minister, who is an alumni, said: “If you want an ambitious devolution deal then you have got to have a mayor.”

And he argued that Cornwall’s Devolution Deal without an elected mayor was not ambitious and did not involve any hand over of money. “What’s the point of going down that route?” he said.

Mr Javid called for the region to have one voice on its plans for economic prosperity. In a region that is challenged by disparate communities and historical rivalries, he said: “If you are going to make a success of the south-west that whole attitude has to change.”A region of collaboration and co-operation can make a difference. It has to happen,” he said.

The beauty of the region means as strong reliance on tourism, but it is a double-edged sword, he warned. “It perpetuates the idea that this is a low skill and part-time economy. It is not just a sunny playground for the rest of the country nor a retirement community for Britain’s pensioners.”

He said the 3 million population of Devon, Cornwall, Somerset and Dorset were leading the way in aerospace and creative industries and it is a question of taking that message to the rest of the country and the world.

The South West Growth Summit was hosted by the Pennon Group in conjunction with the Western Morning News and the region’s Local Enterprise Partnerships. The debate held at the event will go on to help form a Growth Charter for the South West, a document that will be presented to the Government ahead of next month’s Autumn Statement.

The region’s MPs joined business leaders to discuss a number of key issues facing the region, including keeping the brightest talent and attracting investment.
Connectivity in terms of mobile and broadband coverage and investment in the road, rail and air routes continue to be high on the agenda.

Chris Loughlin, Chairman of the Pennon Group called for the region to embrace the digital revolution, the kind of business that makes a virtue of working in remote communities.

He said that the region must decide what the South West is and formulate a concept to rival the Northern Powerhouse or Midlands Engine to capture the collective consciousness. “It is essential that we have a clear unified voice to stand up strong for the South West.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/an-elected-mayor-is-the-answer-to-devolution-ambitions-warns-javid/story-29829580-detail/story.html

“‘Within hours of arriving, I was on a yacht with some investors, being asked to join the Freemasons’ “

“This week, the UK’s largest property event, the MIPIM conference, has opened in London. “#MIPIMUK is waiting for you,” tweeted @MIPIMWorld, the Twitter handle of the international organisation. Underneath was an image of exploding paintballs, overlaid with the words: “THE POST BREXIT BOOM – Are you ready?” …

… The conference this week will be a fairly sedate affair: property magnates with lanyards in expensive suits, stalls dedicated to the Midlands Engine and the Northern Powerhouse, tired corporate phrases like “driving innovation and diversification in the market” (tweeted out from that same MIPIM handle this morning), and so on.

The real fun is had at their annual event in Cannes, scheduled for mid-March, where estate agency professionals and wealthy investors cavort around five-star hotels and champagne receptions in the sunshine, while ruminating about the housing crisis many of them benefit from directly.

“Within hours of arriving, I was on a yacht with some investors, being asked to join the Freemasons,” one MIPIM attendee told me about his experience last year. Another described it as a “nonstop party” where she woke up one morning and couldn’t remember the name of the hotel she was staying in “until I looked at the monogram on my bespoke dressing gown”.

You meet some people who are involved in things that feel dodgy,” another property professional admitted.

“I work in property and I didn’t know about the layers of middlemen and secret deals that go on, particularly where London is concerned. Investors buy up flats before they’re built, then sell them on to other investors, but they don’t want the public to know they’re selling them again because that would drive down the price of the other units they own. So they pay off middlemen to do private deals with people they know, just to keep knowledge of the deals out of the public domain.” …

… Estate agents were happy to tell me that they’re seeing more foreign investors than ever offer to buy London flats traditionally expected to be taken by UK-based first time buyers “because their money goes twice as far now”, which is “great for business”. This is the “Brexit bubble” people feared would make the housing crisis worse after leaving the EU, and it’s fast becoming a reality. One presumes it’s why one of MIPIM’s main events this week is titled: “Extraordinary times, extraordinary returns?”.

Cast your eye over the speakers at MIPIM this week and there’s little to feel optimistic about. There’s Navid Chamdia, the UCL-educated head of real estate at the Qatar Investment Authority. He focuses “on direct acquisitions, joint ventures and co-investments in Europe” after spending 12 years at Ernst & Young “advising on the financing and delivery of over $10bn of global real estate and infrastructure projects”.

There’s Simon Mower, associate director at KPMG Debt Advisory who “has particularly strong experience in the real estate market… navigating the sector’s lender universe… structuring investment and development financing transactions for his clients.” There’s even one entertainingly named Mark Bourgeois.

Then, of course, there’s our astonishingly out-of-touch housing minister Gavin Barwell, who famously suggested that the solution to generational inequality was everybody’s rich grandparents skipping a generation with inheritance and giving the millions they’ve squirrelled away to their grandkids.

Barwell also made a speech two weeks ago in which he suggested the housing crisis could be tackled by making young people live in smaller rooms. “We want people to innovate – there are things the private sector is doing,” he told a fringe event at the Conservative conference. “I don’t know if anyone’s seen any of the schemes that Pocket [Living] have done where they’ve basically done a deal with the GLA [Greater London Authority] to get some flexibility on space standards. As a result they can offer a product well below market price.” A tarted-up way, of course, of saying Pocket Living has managed to twist the standards on what usually would be considered habitable.

For a government minister to openly celebrate this isn’t just irresponsible; it’s downright bizarre.

Britain has the smallest homes in Europe at an average of 500sqft for a one-bedroom flat and Pocket Living sells 400sqft flats – about the size of the average American sitting room, or the average UK hotel room – starting at £250,000.

This week, Gavin Barwell will speak at MIPIM alongside Marc Vlessing, chief executive of Pocket Living, whose background is “in City corporate finance”. If that doesn’t speak volumes about the housing crisis, the Government and the property professionals who pull the strings across the UK, I don’t know what does.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/mipim-housing-crisis-markets-insiders-what-they-say-london-conference-property-magnates-a7369621.html

“Commons watchdog chair Sir Kevin Barron ‘breached’ MPs’ code of conduct “

“The Labour MP in charge of overseeing ethical standards for MPs has been found to have breached a committee’s code of conduct.

Sir Kevin Barron, the chairman of the standards committee, accepted payment for hosting events for a drug company in Parliament.

However, the committee has recommended that no further action is required against Sir Kevin after they concluded that the breach had been “minor” and “inadvertent”.

In March he announced that he had referred himself to Kathryn Hudson, the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner, over the disclosures which were first revealed in the Telegraph.

The fees received by Sir Kevin after sponsoring three events in Parliament were donated to charity, and Ms Hudson concluded the breach of the rules was “at the least serious end of the spectrum” because the MP did not personally benefit.

The report recommended that no further action was required against the Labour MP, who stood aside while the committee examined his case, and the inquiry had raised “no doubts over Kevin Barron’s integrity and honesty”.

Parliamentary rules prohibit MPs from using Commons resources to “confer any undue personal or financial benefit on themselves or anyone else”.

Sir Kevin said that his fees from the organisation had all been paid to charity, and therefore he had not breached the Code of Conduct.

But Sir Alistair Graham, the former chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, said that members of the committee needed to be “whiter than white” and even if Sir Kevin had not personally received the money, the arrangement was still a breach of the rules.

Lord Bew, the chairman of the committee on standards in public life, has called for an overhaul of the Commons standards committe, warning that it looks like an “insider’s game” in which MPs are “marking their own homework”.

Sir Kevin said: “The report published today has found no serious breaches as I always maintained. The inquiry has found a ‘minor’ and ‘inadvertent’ breach of a banqueting rule. I felt that I had taken all the steps I could to check the rules, but acknowledge my mistake.

“Just to make it absolutely clear, this arrangement led to no personal financial gain as payment was made, as a donation, to a local children’s hospice in my constituency.

“I would like to thank Kathryn Hudson, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, for her very thorough investigation into this matter and the Committee on Standards for their judgment.

“I will be resuming my duties as chair of the Committee on Standards and the Committee of Privileges. It has always been a huge honour to chair these committees and I am delighted to return to this role.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/20/commons-watchdog-chair-sir-kevin-barron-breached-mps-code-of-con/