Oxfordshire unites to fight for its community beds services – unlike Diviani and Randall-Johnson in Devon

Owl says: alas it doesn’t matter one jot what our district, town or parish councils think about the removal of community hospitals in general and removal of Honiton’s maternity services specifically, since the majority party cannot even trust their own Leader of our district council – Paul Diviani – to represent them.

(One more reason to turn up at Knowle on 13 September 2017 and watch those cowardly Tory councillors rally round him and turn out in numbers to overturn a vote of no confidence in him – even though it was THEIR confidence that he sabotaged at DCC when he voted against their instructions to refer bed closures to the Secretary of State- at the notorious scrutiny meeting where Sarah Randall-Johnson ensured that no contrary voices would be heard – only those echoing their Tory masters. Diviani being one of those enthusiastic voices.

“Campaigners backed by four councils have won the first round of their legal action over a claim that a consultation over changes at Horton General Hospital was flawed.

They want to prevent plans by Oxfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) to downgrade maternity and critical care services at the hospital in Banbury.

Their campaign has been supported by nearby councils: Cherwell District Council, South Northamptonshire Council, Stratford-on-Avon District Council and Banbury Town Council.

A statement from barristers at Landmark Chambers said: “Campaign group Keep the Horton General has won an important first step in the battle against the downgrading of Horton Hospital.

“Fraser J today granted permission to apply for judicial review of the consultation process.”

The Administrative Court in July refused on the papers permission for a full hearing, but Cherwell successfully challenged that decision this week.
Oxfordshire CCG said last month that its proposed changes would “ensure safety, quality and better outcomes for patients”.

It said the critical care unit at Horton would be downgraded to cater only for less seriously ill patients and it would also lose some beds.

A single specialist obstetric unit would be created at Oxford’s John Radcliffe Hospital and only a midwife service would remain at Horton, though it would gain an improved diagnostic and outpatient service.

A CCG spokesperson said: “We are fully aware of the outcome of today’s oral hearing seeking permission for a judicial review and will co-operate with the process as appropriate.”

“Dorset PCC on merger proposals” – one way to remove Hernandez! ans save money?

The Dorset PCC is a former commended police officer and stood as an independent in Dorset’s PCC elections …

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martyn_Underhill

“Dorset’s police and crime commissioner (PCC) said he welcomed proposals for a “closer working relationship” between the Dorset and Devon and Cornwall forces.

Martyn Underhill said: “I have made no secret about my concerns regarding police funding and the difficulties faced by forces during a time of ever-complex and increasing demand.

“However, that does not mean that we should stop working tirelessly to make the best use of taxpayers’ money.

“It is clear that there is a great deal more work required to understand the potential opportunities and challenges that this proposal might bring.

“Equally, we will need to seek the views of our communities and ensure that feedback is listened to and understood.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-england-devon-41124772

“Coastal communities amongst most deprived in UK, says think-tank”

“Britain’s coastal communities rank among the worst performers for earnings, employment, health, education and a range of other economic and social indicators.

That is the message from the Living on the Edge report by the Social Market Foundation (SMF) think tank, which found economic output per capita was 23% lower in coastal communities compared with inland local authority areas.

The research took ‘coastal’ to mean anywhere adjacent to the sea, not just traditional holiday resorts.

It said five of the 10 local authorities in Great Britain with the lowest average pay were on the coast: Torbay, North Devon, Gwynedd, Hastings and Torridge.

Five of the 10 areas with the highest unemployment rate were also coastal: Hartlepool, North Ayrshire, Torridge, Hastings, South Tyneside and Sunderland.

Half the 20 council areas with the highest proportions of the population with bad or very bad health were coastal.

SMF chief economist Scott Corfe said: “Many coastal communities are poorly connected to major employment centres, which compounds the difficulties faced by residents in these areas.

“Not only do they lack local job opportunities, but travelling elsewhere for work is also relatively difficult.”

He said the government needed a clear definition of a coastal community and should make more effort to address their economic problems.

Policymakers overlooked some poor performers because they were in the south east and so formed islands of deprivation in generally affluent areas, Corfe added.

Issues in coastal communities rose to prominence with a report from the communities and local government select committee in 2007, when MPs took the unusual step of objecting that the government’s response had been complacent and pressed for further action.

The committee said coastal communities tended to be at an economic disadvantage as the sea reduced the size of their economic hinterland compared with inland towns.

They were also likely to have high proportions of retired people, an exodus of younger people and to be geographically remote from population centres.

Following this report, the Labour government created the Sea Change Fund to regenerate coastal towns, which was succeeded under the Coalition by the Coastal Communities Fund.

Coastal communities minister Jake Berry said yesterday there will be a fifth round of funding for this in 2019-21, to provide at least £40m of assistance.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2017/09/coastal-communities-amongst-most-deprived-uk-says-think-tank

“How will councils survive the funding abyss?” (Especially if they are in hock to a vanity project!)

Not to mention re-routing roads in Exmouth so developers can make more money!

“No one in Westminster can say how local authorities will be funded after 2020

From struggling northern councils to seemingly prosperous counties, talk of a financial meltdown is getting louder. “It looks as though we’re approaching a cliff edge and no one has any idea how to stop us hurtling over it,” warns Nick Forbes, senior vice-chair of the Local Government Association (LGA) and Labour leader of Newcastle city council. It is a sentiment echoed across the political spectrum.

For once, it is not the dire prospect of failing to reach a Brexit trade deal which is exercising the minds of local politicians, but rather the consequences of an inconclusive general election. The resulting stasis in government has left English councils in financial limbo, staring into an abyss. Bluntly, no one in government can say how authorities will be funded after 2020 when they were all supposed to become self-financing.

Business rates plan raises fears of greater inequality among councils
Former chancellor George Osborne’s big idea was to set councils free of Whitehall – minus multibillion-pound grants – by handing them back business rate revenue raised locally, instead of redistributing it centrally. Since 2013, councils have kept 50%, which yields £26bn nationally. In his 2016 budget Osborne proclaimed that, compared with 2010 when 80% of council funding came through Whitehall, 100% of local government resources would come from councils themselves by 2020 – “raised locally, spent locally, invested locally”. An alluring prospect?

Some fell for it, foolishly believing this would mythically fill a looming £2.6bn social care funding gap, likely by 2020 on LGA calculations. In reality, the consequences were dire. Without a redistribution formula to compensate councils in poorer areas with boarded-up high streets and, consequently, small tax bases yielding low business rates, some authorities would struggle to balance their books – a legal requirement (unlike the NHS or Whitehall departments). Alongside this financial “devolution” came a sting in the tail: a multimillion pound central government revenue support grant, a mainstay of council funding, would be phased out.

But Osborne’s grand design crashed when a local government finance bill, the delivery mechanism, fell in the run-up to the June election. It has not been resurrected. The resulting Queen’s speech omitted to mention the proposed legislation.

Forbes highlights the dilemma. While Newcastle, ostensibly with the highest business tax base in the north-east, raises £154m a year from business rates, he estimates it would still be £16m a year worse off than under the current grant regime. By contrast, Westminster city council would be the ultimate winner – raising £1.8bn annually.

Such disparities were being addressed in a “fair funding review” involving senior civil servants and local government professionals earlier this year alongside discussions on the practicalities of devolving business rates to councils by 2020. But since June there has been a deafening silence in Whitehall. No meetings have taken place. “There was a relatively advanced debate about how the 100% retention [of business rates] would work – and a debate within local government about what kind of criteria is needed for some kind of redistribution mechanism,” says Forbes. “We were gearing up over the next few years to work with government. And all of what has collapsed.”

The result is one almighty mess. Professional bodies, such as the organisation representing senior council finance officers – the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (Cipfa) – are close to despair. English local government is facing the worst of all outcomes: the phasing out of a central revenue support grant without the compensation of a locally held business rate underpinned by a yet-to-be defined redistribution formula, in which rich councils would have to help compensate the poorest.

Having seen their budgets chopped by at least a third since 2010 in the name of austerity, councils are already facing their biggest financial crisis. This is compounded by funding for adult and children’s social care consuming two-thirds of their budgets, with other once-essential services slashed or axed.

Confusion reigns. Already three areas, Greater Manchester, Liverpool city region and London are piloting the full, local 100% business rate regime, buoyed by – presumably interim – government funding to ensure they do not lose out. Other pilots were promised. But there is doubt over whether the full devolution of business rates will ever happen.

If that’s the case, Forbes wonders what the pilot areas are meant to be piloting? For its part, the LGA has one concern: “Where’s the Plan B?” asks Forbes. No one can answer. The clock is ticking.”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/sep/05/how-will-councils-survive-funding-abyss

Those “poor” developers get richer

“[Redrow’s] Pre-tax profits rose 26 per cent to £315m in the year to the end of June, Redrow said today, against revenues of £1.66bn, up 20 per cent on last year’s figures.

Legal completions – the number of homes bought – rose 15 per cent to 6,416, while its order book rose 14 per cent to £1.1bn. Average selling price increased seven per cent to £309,800.

Meanwhile, its number of outlets increase three per cent to 132, while it added 5,419 plots to its land bank.

So good was its performance, it has raised guidance to turnover of £2.2bn by 2020, while pre-tax profit is expected to hit £430m. Dividend will rise to 32p per share.

Today it hiked its dividend by 70 per cent to 17p. Shares rose 5.8 per cent to 655.9p in the first minutes of trading.”

http://www.cityam.com/271378/redrow-has-hiked-its-dividend-70-per-cent-after-profits

Brighton Council crowdfunds property renovation

“The Victorians built their public structures to last, but they didn’t lose a lot of sleep over the cost of long-term maintenance.

The Madeira Terraces on the east of Brighton’s seafront were built in the mid-1800s and have formed the backdrop to the National Speed Trials, Brighton Marathon and a host of other public events. But over the years, the cast iron has taken a battering from storms across the channel and has been sorely neglected, leading to their closure in 2013.

The dangerously decrepit terraces are a sad contrast to Brighton’s glitzy attractions, such as the i360 observation tower on the main drag. This vital restoration work is the council’s responsibility, and the final bill could be as much as £30m.

Last year, Brighton and Hove council lost out in a bid for government funding to fix the problem and has now launched a crowdfunding appeal. At the time of writing, it has raised £157,193 of its £430,669 target, including a contribution of £100,000 from the council. The closing date for the campaign is 30 November.

Anyone who pledges £2 or more will become a “friend” of Madeira Terraces and will be eligible to vote on which businesses will move into the first three restored arches. A pledge greater than £5,000 will earn a name on a large plaque on the terraces. The crowdfunding scheme is organised by funding platform Spacehive, which will be paid around £15,000 if the campaign is successful. No money will be taken from donors until the total is reached….”

https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/sep/05/power-people-councils-crowdfunding-regenerate-madeira-terraces-brighton

Ministerial boxes travel by chauffeur-driven cars

The Government is still spending thousands of pounds a year on driving only ministerial briefcases around Whitehall in chauffeur-driven splendour despite a promise to get rid of ‘red boxes’ in the digital era.

A Freedom of Information request submitted by HuffPost UK has revealed £44,010 was lavished last year on ferrying documents – and no passengers – between government departments and a minister’s home, just under £3,000 more than the previous year.

In the six years since the then coalition Government promised a crackdown on wasteful spending, almost £400,000 has been spent on the practice.

Labour criticised “another broken promise” as the FOI response also revealed papers were driven around 540 times during 2016/17, or more than 4,000 times since the pledge.

But the Department for Transport pointed to how the annual cost and number of trips have been slashed by half since 2011.

So-called “despatch box movements” have long been part of Westminster culture, but ministers have been at pains to stress how they want to do things differently with the help of new technology.

The die was cast before David Cameron entered office in 2009, pledging to end “politicians swanning around in chauffeur-driven cars like they’re the royal family”.

In 2011, Francis Maude, the Cabinet Office minister in charge of civil service reform, said the Government was moving towards paperless working, and suggested the need for hard copies rather than email was an “alibi”.

Two years ago, he signalled ministerial boxes were doomed and state-of-the-art smartphones would do the heavy lifting instead.”

https://t.co/8KHmick4EX

“NHS warns of ‘dangerous’ beds shortage this winter”

“Patients could die this winter because the NHS is alarmingly unprepared to deal with the surge of people who fall ill during the cold weather, hospital bosses warn today.

NHS Providers, which represents hospital trusts in England, fears lives could be lost because patients are being forced to spend long periods waiting in ambulances outside A&E, or on trolleys.

Hospitals are so “dangerously short” of beds that they may be unable to cope with the coming winter, Chris Hopson, the organisation’s chief executive, told the Observer. They will struggle even more than last winter – when chaotic scenes led the Red Cross to call the situation “a humanitarian crisis” – because a £1bn government initiative intended to free 2,000-3,000 beds by September has failed, he added.

That scheme aimed to reduce the proportion of beds occupied by patients who are fit to be discharged but cannot leave – called “delayed transfers of care” – to 3.5% of all beds by this month. It was 5.6% of beds at the end of 2016 and still 5.2% at the end of June, NHS figures show.

“That 3.5% target is going to be missed,” Hopson said. “Therefore, hospitals this winter will still be too full of people whom we can’t discharge, even though they are medically fit to leave, because of problems with social care. Failure to do so leaves us dangerously short of capacity.

“That means that it could be even worse than last year, when there were far too many patients waiting more than 12 hours on a trolley or in the back of an ambulance to be seen. We were running much greater levels of risk to patient safety than we had had for at least a decade and we don’t want to see that level of risk again.”

Hopson added: “If that does happen, it could result in patients having dreadful experiences. If people are ill, they need to be seen quickly or their condition gets worse or ultimately they die prematurely. Waiting unduly long can mean patients getting much iller than they should be and dying when they don’t need to.”

A new NHS Providers report details its concerns about winter.

In an online commentary for the Observer, Hopson writes that, despite efforts by the NHS nationally to plan for the cold spell ahead, “NHS trusts are worried that they do not have enough staff, beds and other services to manage the risk to patient safety this winter”.

The warning comes as some hospitals continue to struggle with the number of patients seeking help, even though winter is months away. Last Thursday the NHS trust which runs Royal Stoke University Hospital and County Hospital in Stafford asked people to stay away from their A&E units, except in a genuine emergency, to help reduce the “extreme pressures” on the units.

“Currently, both sites are experiencing the type of demand usually only see in the middle of winter, so people are experiencing long waits and our staff are exceptionally busy. Please only attend A&E Departments for anything classed as an emergency including choking, chest pain, loss of consciousness, severe blood loss, broken bones, difficulty breathing, deep wounds or a suspected stroke,” it said.

On Friday, Gavin Boyle, the chief executive of Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, wrote in his blog: “Without wanting to come over all Game of Thrones, winter is coming! For many working in our hospitals, it feels as though winter never went away and indeed August was one of our busiest months for emergency admissions.”

Also last week, University Hospitals of Leicester Trust put in place plans to improve its poor performance against the four-hour A&E target before the start of winter. These include increasing the number of doctors working overnight in A&E, a daily “safety huddle” of senior doctors, ensuring full staffing and managers monitoring how quickly the emergency department is processing patients.

Two trust bosses said that their hospitals are already facing major problems, especially because of staff shortages. “The first quarter of this year [2017-18] has been as challenging as any I can remember; there has been no let-up. Acuity, attendances and admissions have all stayed high,” said Nick Hulme, chief executive of Colchester Hospital University Foundation NHS Trust. “Our major concern going into this winter is staffing. Going into August we are 50 junior doctors short on our rotas across the hospital. Every day is a constant struggle for junior doctors and registered nurses.”

John Lawlor, his counterpart at the Northumberland, Tyne and Wear Mental Health Trust, said itsinability to arrange packages of care to enable patients to be discharged, resulting in beds being occupied unnecessarily, was “a significant concern. [In addition] pressures on staffing, especially in psychiatry, are beginning to impact on services and these will become more intense until the new people trained begin to come on stream over the next five to 10 years.”

The health service regulator NHS Improvement warned that hospitals had experienced “extremely high levels of bed occupancy” during April, May and June, despite those usually being the service’s quietest months. The regulator said it doubted that the plan for hospitals to return to treating the required 95% of A&E patients within four hours by the end of 2017 would succeed.

NHS England admitted that this winter would be tough, and revealed that hospitals were already planning to open at least 3,000 beds, which should help manage demand and minimise the risks to patients.

“The NHS will face challenges this winter, as it does every year, but NHS Providers have stated that winter planning is more advanced than it was last year and – as they argue – special attention is being paid to areas where pressures are likely to be greatest,” said Pauline Philip, NHSE’s national urgent and emergency care director.

“We are currently in the process of assessing how many extra beds trusts are planning to open over winter and early returns indicate that this will be more than 3,000. This is something we will continue to review on the basis of evidence rather than arbitrary estimates. If the expectations for reduced delayed transfers of care outlined by the government are achieved, this would free up a further 2,000 to 3,000 beds over the winter period, on top of the extra 3,000 plus beds that hospitals now say they’re going to open.”

The Department of Health was more upbeat about winter. “Thanks to the hard work and dedication of staff, alongside record levels of funding to ease pressure on A&E departments, the NHS has prepared for winter more this year than ever before, ensuring patients continue to receive safe and efficient care as demand increases,” a spokesperson said.

“As new expert analysis shows, spending on the NHS is in line with other European countries, and once again our health service was independently judged to be the best and most efficient health system in the world.”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/sep/02/nhs-warns-of-dangerous-beds-shortage-this-winter

Councils have hands tied over secondary school place increases needed

“A potential shortage of school places looms ahead in secondary schools in England, councils are warning.

The Local Government Association says schools will be thousands of places short over the next few years as a population bulge moves up from primary.
It says schools in 12 councils will be over capacity by 2018, rising to nearly half of councils within five years.

But the Department for Education attacked the figures as “thoroughly misleading”.

This is the sixth year in a row that town hall bosses, who are responsible for ensuring sufficient places, have warned of a future squeeze.
This time, the LGA says schools could be nearly 8,000 places short by September 2018 and 125,000 short by 2022.

‘Real frustration’

The figures represent the difference between the predicted pupil numbers and the number of places presently available on the ground.

Councils say the problem is becoming more difficult for them deal with as they no longer have any influence over many of the schools that may need to expand.

Councils say the problem is becoming more difficult for them deal with as they no longer have any influence over many of the schools that may need to expand.

The surge in primary school pupils has seen councils help deliver an extra 600,000 places since 2010, but this was achieved by adding rooms and capacity to council primary schools.

At secondary level, two-thirds of schools are now academies which are independent of local authorities.

Councillor Richard Watts said: “It is not difficult to predict the number of kids who will need a place – you get 11 years’ notice – so there’s a real sense of frustration that there’s this intense pressure.
“Over the years, our powers to deal with the issue have reduced, and this creates a bigger problem.

“Given that most of secondary schools in the country are now academies, local government does not have the powers to require these schools to expand or to set up new schools themselves.”

Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: “No-one can really claim that it’s a surprise.

“We have had the National Audit Office predicting these student numbers.
“The information was there, the planning should have been done.

“How have we ended up where we are?”

‘735,000 extra places’

The way forward was a collaborative approach between local authorities, academy chains and the regional schools commissioners overseeing academy standards, Mr Barton said.

A Department for Education spokesperson said: “Local authorities have a statutory duty to ensure that there is a school place available for every child.

“We have allocated £5.8bn of basic need funding between 2015 and 2020 to enable them to do this, and over 735,000 additional pupil places were created between 2010 and 2016.

“This money is given to councils based on their own estimates of the number of places they will need.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-41110662

“Nine in 10 MPs don’t believe UK’s social care system is fit for purpose”

And Owl thinks the other 1 in 10 are self-serving idiots – one of whom is Jeremy Hunt.

“Only 10 per cent believe pensioners needing help to stay living in their own homes are well served, found the poll of 101 English parliamentarians.

Just 13 per cent of Labour MPs and 35 per cent of Conservative MPs say social care services in their constituencies are up to scratch.

“Confidence that the social care system can deal with the UK’s ageing population has virtually evaporated among parliamentarians,” said Janet Morrison, chief executive of Independent Age, which carried out the research.

“The crisis in social care was front and centre in the election earlier this year, and it is clear from this poll that there is an overwhelming desire from politicians on all sides for the Government to work towards a cross-party consensus on a solution.”

Former Lib Dem health minister in the coalition government Norman Lamb said: “The health and care system in England is creaking at the seams.

“An unprecedented number of older people need support in later life but are finding high-quality care is hard to come by.

“Without lasting reform, the most vulnerable frail and elderly people are at real risk of falling through the gaps and not getting the support they expect and deserve.”

The Government has pledged an extra £2bn for social care over the next few years but it is only one-off funding which reduces each year.

Vital services caring for elderly and disabled people still face an annual £2.3bn funding gap by 2020, which will continue to grow, according to the Local Government Association.

Izzi Seccombe, chairwoman of the LGA’s community wellbeing board, said: “It’s encouraging to see so many MPs across all political parties recognising the need for action to find a sustainable solution to the adult social care funding crisis.”

Margaret Willcox, of the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services, said: “Older and disabled people and their families need and deserve high quality, reliable and personal care.

“For this to happen, and with MPs returning to Parliament next week, government needs to address adult social care as a priority so it can be future-proofed for people who will continue to need care and support in increasing numbers.”

The poll of more than 2,000 British adults also found that many under-estimate the cost of social care.

On average, UK adults estimate that residential care would cost £549 a week – when in reality it costs on average £866 for a place in a nursing home, the Centre said.

Meanwhile, another poll carried out by carehome.co.uk found that four in 10 of care home residents do not receive regular visits from friends and family.

A total of 1,154 care home owners, managers and staff were asked to estimate the percentage of residents that do not receive regular visits, with 42 per cent being the average figure given.

A Department of Health spokeswoman said: “This Government is absolutely committed to improving social care in this country, which is why we have provided an additional £2bn for the sector, introduced tougher inspections to keep driving up standards and committed to consult on the future of social care to ensure sustainability in the long term.”

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/847814/MPs-dont-believe-UKs-social-care-system-fit-purpose

Ambulance delays – a matter of life and death – underfunding blamed

“Almost two patients die a month on average after failings by the ambulance service, including delays or a failure to recognise the severity of symptoms, a review of coroners’ reports has found.

Coroners in England and Wales have written to ambulance services or call handlers 86 times since July 2013 warning them that they need to make changes to prevent future deaths.

Forty-eight of the warnings related to ambulance delays or problems with call handling, according to the review by Minh Alexander, a former whistleblower who now campaigns on patient safety. She said the volume of reports suggested a “significant decline in ambulance safety in recent years”.

She added: “Action is needed to rectify underfunding, related workforce and skill mix issues, and pressures on the whole NHS that spill on to ambulance services.”

Coroners have a duty to write a report under regulation 28 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 if it appears there is a risk of other deaths occurring in similar circumstances. Dr Alexander, a psychiatrist who raised concerns about patient deaths, produced her report by analysing section 28 reports published by the chief coroner.

A number of the reports highlight delays caused by slow handovers at A&E departments, echoing warnings from the National Audit Office earlier this year. In many cases the delay was not found to have caused the deaths but coroners were sufficiently concerned by what they heard at inquest to warn ambulance service bosses that delays could be fatal in the future.

In April, Gilva Tisshaw, assistant coroner for Brighton and Hove, wrote to South East Coast ambulance service following the death of Ronald William Bennett, warning of “serious delays in ambulances arriving at the scene of an incident as a consequence of ambulance crews being delayed at the accident and emergency department”.

There were also a number of cases involving call handlers without medical training and their computer programmes failing to recognise the severity of a situation.

In June, Elizabeth Earland, senior coroner for the Exeter and Great Devon district, wrote to South Western ambulance service after the death of Colin James Sluman, 68, who had a burst varicose vein. He called an ambulance at 1.36am, but bled to death before an ambulance arrived at 3.03am.

Dr Earland said the protocol followed by call handlers, on which they were “completely reliant”, did not recognise reports of dizziness in a patient on their own “as important triggers for a rapid response”.

An ambulance service spokeswoman said the trust had taken action to address the concerns.

Martin Flaherty, managing director of the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives, said ambulance services took coroners’ reports “extremely seriously” and would make changes in response where possible.

In 2016 English ambulances handled 10.7 million emergency calls.

Case study

Grant Benson, 21, died in a fire following a car accident in August 2014 after making a 999 call. Andrew Tweddle, senior coroner for County Durham and Darlington, wrote to the Yorkshire ambulance service after the event. He said: “It is clear from listening to the recording how frantic the driver became as the fire began and took hold.”

The car came off the road near Barnard Castle, County Durham, but the call handler at the ambulance service was based in Wakefield. She and two colleagues failed to pinpoint the crash location so an ambulance could be dispatched.

The inquest heard that it was not possible to transfer responsibility for calls between emergency services, and one ambulance service could not send a vehicle from another. Emergency services attended only after a further call had been made by a passer-by.

A Yorkshire ambulance service spokeswoman said it had “taken steps to review local practice.”

Source: The Times, pay wall

The “great and the good” should speak up for our NHS – but remember those who speak and vote against it

From Letters page, Guardian: remember it was Paul Diviani and Sarah Randall Johnson that took Honiton and Seaton hospitals from us.

• “I was thrilled to read Professor Stephen Hawking’s glowing tribute to our “finest public service”. At 75 years of age and a world-class scientist known by everyone in the country, Professor Hawking is in a perfect position to state his case for the prosecution of the Tories and Jeremy Hunt in particular, for their mendacity over what they say they are doing for the NHS, while undermining it by cuts, underfunding and demoralisation of staff, as well as introducing privatisation for years without proclaiming their real aim, which is to destroy the NHS and replace it with a US-style insurance system controlled by multinational companies.

Many ordinary patients like me have protested to our local MPs over the years about the political decisions the Tories have made to ultimately scrap the NHS, and their relentless pursuit of the drip-drip methods of convincing people that we cannot afford the NHS any more. This is a total lie, and I would like other well-known people who value and cherish the NHS to come out and say so before it’s too late.

Nye Bevan said the NHS would exist only as long as people were willing to fight for it. Let’s hear it from the great and the good in support of the treasure in our midst.

Lynda Mannix
East Grinstead, West Sussex”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/aug/30/labour-ought-to-speak-out-about-the-nhs-as-strongly-as-stephen-hawking

Flood standards – a familiar tale with shades of Grenfell Tower – what happens when business trumps safety

“Hurricane Harvey has caused huge damage in Texas as 30 inches of rain in less than 48 hours resulted in massive flooding.

The current US President, however, has abolished a number of flood standards in an attempt to get infrastructure projects approved more quickly. The Federal Flood Risk Management Standard is among those to have been rolled back.

In 2015, Mr Obama introduced measures that made it harder to build roads, bridges and other infrastructure in areas that were susceptible to flooding. Plans for such projects would legally have to take into account the impact of climate change and be built to withstand future changes.

While the new regulations had not yet come into effect, they have now been scrapped entirely after Mr Trump decided they were too likely to slow down plans for new infrastructure.

Announcing the decision earlier in August, the billionaire businessman said: “We’re going to get infrastructure built quickly, inexpensively, relatively speaking, and the permitting process will go very, very quickly.”

“It’s going to be a very streamlined process, and by the way, if it doesn’t meet environmental safeguards, we’re not going to approve it.”

However, some of those safeguards have now been removed. The order also introduces a two-year time limit for permission to be granted for major infrastructure projects, in which Mr Trump has pledged to invest $1 trillion.

The move was praised by business groups but strongly opposed by environmentalists.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-barack-obama-flood-protections-flooding-hurricane-harvey-houston-texas-a7916476.html

Honiton hospital beds close today; Seaton hospital Friends express dismay

“Seaton and District Hospital League of Friends has expressed its dismay at the loss of all its inpatient beds.

Speaking after the closure plans began last week chairman Dr. Mark Welland told the Herald: “We would like to express our deep gratitude to the many dedicated staff who have provided such a high quality of care to patients over the past 29 years, and also our sincere thanks to the numerous volunteers who have worked on the wards to support the patients and nurses.

“The League remains steadfast in its belief that beds are a necessary resource in Seaton, and will continue to explore every avenue that might lead to the reopening of the inpatient service in Seaton Hospital.

“At the same time, we would like to emphasise the ongoing work that will be taking place in Seaton Hospital – whilst it is true that no inpatient beds will be open, there are many more activities carried out at our hospital.

“These include the out-patient clinics which will continue to run, including rheumatology, ear nose and throat, audiology, spinal assessment, and general medicine clinics.

“The ever busy Seaton Hospital physiotherapy department will be continuing at full speed.

“Alongside these the hospital will continue to function as a base for community teams, including the rehabilitation team, speech and language therapy, community nursing, school nurse and health visitor teams, and the complex care team.

“There is now an opportunity for those hospital resources left under utilised by the bed closures to be put to new uses, and the Seaton and District Hospital League of Friends is currently active in establishing which services might be added to the above list to best serve the local community.

“The League continues to support the Seaton Friends Hospiscare at Home service, which will now be more vital than ever, with no opportunity to use hospital beds for end of life care. The Seaton Friends Hospiscare@Home service is entirely funded by the league, and receives no funding from NHS sources, even as the NHS support for end of life care locally is pared back. The League is very thankful to everyone who continues to support us, and to allow our work to continue.”

http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/dismay-over-seaton-hospital-bed-closures-1-5166084

And no thanks to our two MPs who simply turned up for photo opportunities and mouthed platitudes whilst voting in Parliament for these closures.

Now nurseries are following nursing homes and closing due to lack of government funding

“Tens of thousands of parents are still waiting to find out if they can take up a government offer of 30 hours’ free childcare days before the scheme is due to be launched.

According to the latest figures, revealed in a letter sent by the Department for Education to local authorities and seen by the Observer, 82,000 parents entitled to the extra childcare have not yet secured a place for their three and four-year-olds. The offer, which doubles the current government-funded allowance, was a flagship Tory election pledge and is due to be implemented on Friday. But the policy appears to be mired in confusion amid claims of a funding shortfall and technical hitches.

According to new research given to the Observer by the early years shadow minister Tracy Brabin, three-quarters of childcare providers expect the policy to have a negative impact on their business and fewer than 7% say it will be positive. The same research claims that the scheme is underfunded, and that as many as one in three nurseries have not yet decided to offer any free places.

“I’m deeply concerned that many children won’t have access to the quality childcare they deserve – and that parents were promised,” said Brabin, who received 660 responses after she set up an online survey of childcare providers over the summer.

The Pre-School Learning Alliance estimates there is a 20% shortfall between the amount the government is giving local authorities to fund the scheme and the actual cost to nurseries. It said that some nurseries will have to close as a result, and some have already gone under. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2017/aug/26/childcare-free-hours-hmrc

Forget Heart of the South West, hello Great South West!

Not much in the way of money passing through their hands these days, thanks to former heavy reliance on government handouts and EU money.

Now, forget the “Heart of th South West” LEP and the “Golden Triangle” LEP and look forward to … well leave you to make up your own minds by letting them explain themselves.

But they soldier on, making more invisible clothes for the emperor, bigging up projects that are grinding on, avoiding talk of those that are stuck or being downgraded.

Here’s highlights from their August newsletter where we find an interesting new development.

First of all, the LEPs are all struggling to achieve anything so they are trying to find safety in numbers:

“This message and strong business interest have been taken forward into the Great South West brand. The work is at an early stage and is yet to involve more partners in the region; it is meant to be a flexible concept which partners can use on a project by project basis when it adds real value. Importantly, it aims to give us added weight with Government and other key stakeholders when we need to communicate across a larger geography. The concept has been progressed by the South West Leaders’ Forum and will continue to be developed through partnership and consultation with local authorities, MPs, business and the education sector.”

And so, our LEP will now aim to be part of a conglomerate called – wait for it

THE GREAT SOUTH WEST

to rival the (currently rather dead in the water) “Northern Powerhouse”.

Here’s how they explain it:

“In order to compete with other UK and international regions, ‘Great South West’ aims to bring together a wide range of stakeholders from across the whole of the South West including Local Authorities, LEPs, MPs, Business and Education. It’s being created as a vehicle to promote all that is great about the region and to act as a common banner to communicate a clear focus on the opportunities to deliver prosperity.

With over £100bn of business opportunities, the South West has much to contribute; a dynamic and progressive South West economy can generate the critical success factors needed for a successful national economy.

As a region, the South West is diverse with different priorities covering different geographies. By working together, we will develop strategies and actions to secure enhanced funding and investment creating a prosperous region for all of us.”

AND it even has a brand new web page!

http://greatsouthwest.org.uk/pages/contact-us/94

But don’t worry, the current and former members of our LEP are not neglecting their nuclear interests:

“In response to the Government’s commitment to work on an ‘early sector deal’ with the nuclear industry in the Industrial Strategy, NSW (made up of HotSW, West of England, Dorset and GFirst LEPs together with the private and academic/skills sectors) and its equivalent partners in the North West, have set out an approach to the Nuclear Industry Council to making the UK a global lead for the nuclear industry. …

The approach is an early stage and we will refine this through continued dialogue with Government on an effective nuclear sector deal. NSW believes it’s a major step forward and a testament to its integrity and profile that the North West consortium supported this joint approach.”

Lots and lots of scope for wasting more and more money there!

And last, but very much not least our LEP finally seems to realise that Brexit is upon us! And it has ANOTHER new sub-group:

The Brexit Resilience and Opportunities Group continues to draw together intelligence to understand the threats of Brexit in our area and maximise any opportunities.

Good information is crucial and the Group is still looking for more businesses to give their views on how their business will be affected by leaving the EU. The more people that respond, the better the results will be in building a meaningful response across all sectors.”

Summary: Heart of the South West LEP quietly morphing into …. drum roll… another iteration of the

South West Regional Development Agency

originally cut off in its bureaucratic prime by – the Conservative Government in 2012:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regional_development_agency

Newsletter:
http://mailchi.mp/heartofswlep/august-heart-of-the-south-west-lep-newsletter

And still as unaccountable and non-transparent as ever – just BIGGER!

Lancashire County Councillors want to save money by combining CEO and Finance jobs – CEO doesn’t want them to

A county council cabinet that is prepared to force its CEO to take on two jobs which would “significantly reduce checks and balances” and cause her an enormous conflict of interest.

“Lancashire County Council has voted to merge its chief executive and section 151 officer roles, sparking a row about accountability.

At a meeting on Monday, the authority’s Conservative cabinet voted in favour of the unusual move in the teeth of vocal criticism from opposition Labour councillors.

The vote came at the end of a meeting at which current chief executive Jo Turton made a plea to keep both roles separate.

She told the cabinet: “Now plainly I do have a personal interest in this matter, but the report is not about me but about the future shape of the county council.

“I would simply emphasise there are reasons why there are three statutory officer roles and that combining them significantly reduces the checks and balances within the governance structure of this council.”

She added that a survey had confirmed that no other county or similar-sized metropolitan authority has such a combined role.

Turton also said she objected to part of the proposal which would separate children and adult services. Overall, the cabinet argued that the overall restructuring proposals would save £244,000 a year.”

During the meeting, a number of opposition councillors lined up to speak against the proposal. Councillor David Whipp said: “It is quite clear that there is a huge risk of consolidating executive power in the hands of a single person.

“There is a reason why there are checks and balances, why there is a division of responsibility, and that is to ensure that proper consideration is given to initiatives that come forward.

“A chief executive may wish to be very bold and that has to be tempered by a small ‘c’ Conservative officer exercising that section 151 responsibility.”

In tense exchanges with council leader Geoff Driver, Labour group leader Azhar Ali said:

“The question needs to be asked why Kent, Gloucestershire, Surrey, Buckinghamshire, North Yorkshire, Leicestershire – all these big counties which are all conservative controlled – have decided not to undertake that role.

“The answer simply is because it is not viable, not good governance.”

Worries over interim costs

Ali also said that the cost of employing an interim to perform the role of chief executive and section 151 officer – which he said could reach up to £2,000 a day – would wipe out any savings in the first year.

He also questioned whether the council would be able to find anyone capable of taking on the new role.

He said: “There is a small pool of people qualified at this level to undertake this work and that small pool of people is already in employment.

“There is a danger that the way this is being done – and the damage to this authority’s reputation that has already been done by this cabinet and leader – that the number of applicants might be very small.

“Therefore, there’s a risk of no appointments and again you’ll have to resort in part to either asking officers of this council to step up out of those roles which they might not want or resorting to interims. Again there is a cost.”

Responding to the criticism, Driver said: “We are in serious financial difficulties and we need somebody at the top with financial expertise who can advise the county council on both policy and financial matters at the same time.

“If it was felt inappropriate to combine the two roles the law would stop it happening and it doesn’t.”

Practice ‘died out’ in noughties

Speaking to Room151, Rob Whiteman, chief executive of the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy, confirmed there is nothing in the rules that prevents the move.

He said: “If what members want from their chief executive is an organisational head of an organisation with strong management and planning and a focus on making the organisation more efficient it can make sense for the roles to be combined.

“If, on the other hand, they are looking for the chief executive to have a focus on regeneration deals and putting together development partnerships, then you are at risk of creating a conflict of interest.”

Whiteman served at London Borough of Barking and Dagenham in a dual chief executive and section 151 role in the early noughties.

At that time, it was not unusual for chief executives to also hold section 151 responsibilities, with Bob Coomber at Southwark, Tony Redmond at Harrow and Richard Harbord at Richmond all performing both roles.

However, the practice has virtually died out since the introduction of the cabinet system into local government in 2000. Last year, Lancashire warned that it faced the prospect of being unable to carry out its statutory duties due to a major structural deficit.

A report commissioned by the council from accountancy firm PwC found that even if the council is successful in meeting all of its cost reduction targets, it will have a cumulative deficit of £398m by 2021.”

http://www.room151.co.uk/resources/lancs-merger-of-s151-and-ceo-roles-sparks-accountability-row/