More detail on Chief Constable conduct complaint

The complaint which led to an investigation into the conduct of Devon & Cornwall’s chief constable was made by defeated Devon Liberal Democrat MP Adrian Sanders, it has emerged.

Shaun Sawyer, the chief constable of Devon & Cornwall Police, has been placed under investigation for comments he made during an interview with the BBC – but denies any wrongdoing.

The investigation relates to comments about an inquiry into the declaration of general election expenses by Devon and Cornwall’s Police and Crime Commissioner Alison Hernandez.

Mrs Hernandez is currently being investigated following a complaint about alleged false accounting, relating to her role as the Conservative Party election agent in Torbay in May last year.

It was at the General Election that sitting Liberal Democrat MP Mr Sanders lost out to Conservative Kevin Foster, and Mrs Hernandez was the Tories’ election agent. She was elected as PCC in May this year.

In an interview with the BBC about the inquiry into Ms Hernandez, Mr Sawyer said that although “democracy is important” Parliament needed to consider procedures for dealing with complaints about the way elections are run.

He said: “This is taking up police time.

“It is taxpayers’ money.”

Mr Sawyer said in a statement on Tuesday: “I am aware that the OPCC (Office for the Police and Crime Commissioner) has received a complaint from a member of the public concerning comments I made in the course of a BBC interview regarding a police investigation into the Police and Crime Commissioner, Alison Hernandez.

“This complaint has been considered by the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission) and remitted back to the OPCC for resolution.

“I welcome an independent investigation into this complaint and look forward to hearing the outcome in due course.”

Gloucestershire Police has been brought in to carry out the investigation into Mr Sawyer, according to BBC Devon.

Read more: VIDEO – 89-year old Phyllis says next sting could be fatal in Bickleigh home wasp invasion battle

Mr Sanders welcomed the probe. He said: “You can’t make statements like that unless you have some background detail.

“He’s not in a position to know that detail, especially when it’s his boss who is the subject of investigation.”

The Devon & Cornwall force is investigating claims of false election expenses accounting by the Conservative Party at last year’s General Election.

In May this year magistrates approved an application from Devon & Cornwall Police to investigate four South West MPs, and the newly elected Police and Crime Commissioner Ms Hernandez.

Because the investigation included Ms Hernandez, Devon & Cornwall chief constable Shaun Sawyer asked the West Mercia Constabulary to conduct inquiries on his behalf.

The inquiry is now being handled by the IPCC and is expected to be concluded by November.

Ms Hernandez denies any wrongdoing and has said she is ready to help with any inquiries.

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/defeated-mp-made-complaint-against-devon-cornwall-chief-constable/story-29838762-detail/story.html

“Journalism is finding out what someone else doesn’t want you to know – everything else is public relations

Mid-Devon is one of the four councils that makes up the secretive “Greater Exeter”.

“THEY say that journalism is finding out what someone else doesn’t want you to know – everything else is public relations, writes Katie French.

This week especially that distinction has felt rather relevant.

With the news that two prominent councillors had been removed from their high-profile positions at Mid Devon District Council, it was important to find out why.

But how can a reporter get to the bottom of a story when those involved are not speaking to you?

This paper is regularly inundated with requests from the council for photo opportunities and self-congratulatory coverage but in the last seven days, the phones have been nigh on silent.

In a quest to get to the bottom of the Tiverton Portas Company investigation, repeated attempts have been made to contact councillors Sue Griggs and Neal Davey.

Neither has answered calls nor responded to emails.

This would all be very well if they hadn’t chosen a life in public office. But when you begin to take an allowance from the taxpayer to stand as a councillor, your decisions as a public servant open you up to a reasonable expectation of scrutiny.

Through their roles at the Tiverton Portas Company – Cllr Griggs as chair and Cllr Davey as secretary – the pair have become the trusted faces responsible for the £100,000 of government money supplied to improve the town.

Both have enjoyed ample column inches celebrating their successes. Yet when asked to comment on this investigation they have been silent.

This refusal to respond to reasonable requests has infuriated the chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance.

John O’Connell said: “Local residents will be incensed. This repeated refusal to speak to reporters shows a shocking contempt for scrutiny and transparency.

“The individuals responsible must be held to account. This is an utter disgrace and the council needs to sort it out without delay.”

But the councillors are not the only ones who have been difficult to reach.

Mid Devon District Council carried out the investigation into the Tiverton Portas Company after a complaint was made by a member of the public.

Numerous sources told this paper that a deficit of £18,000 had been discovered. That claim turned out to be unfounded but had the findings of the investigation – as presented to the standards committee on October 6 – been held in public, the claim would have had no credibility in the first place.

This increasing trend for public-funded bodies to attend to matters in private is not good for anyone – and it is not good enough.

As taxpayers we have a right to learn how our money is spent. Press and public should stand together and challenge unreasonable attempts to keep private matters relating to the taxpayer’s purse.

Next week a meeting will be held at Tiverton Town Council to discuss the findings of Mid Devon District Council’s audit.

It has been hinted that it will be held in chambers – meaning the press and public will be excluded.

This is not acceptable and the Gazette will be challenging the motion.

After all – if it is deliberately being held away from a reporter it’s likely there is going to be something worth hearing.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/public-servants-have-an-obligation-to-keep-us-informed-comment/story-29838892-detail/story.html

EDDC spends more than £ 700,000 on external legal advice in 3 years

Summary of request

I would like to know the amount of money the department spent on the services of external law firms and barristers for each of the last three years (years ending March 31). If this is not possible within the restrictions of the Freedom of Information Act, two years of data will suffice.

Summary of response

2013/14 Legal fees including barristers £285,075.61
2014/15 Legal fees including barristers £353,060.78
2015/16 Legal fees including barristers £79,053.34

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/access-to-information/freedom-of-information/freedom-of-information-published-requests/

Oh, oh – Government says we have to have an elected Mayor!

Must be a credible figure … now, THAT is going to take some finding! From Devon or Somerset? Career councillor or business person? Nuclear interests or not? LEP member or not? Brexiter or not? Developer or not? Ruralist or Urbanist? And where is DCC, Greater Exeter and EDDC in all this? …

AND Sajid Javid manages to disparage tourism and older people in one paragraph.

“Ambitious devolution plans for Devon and Somerset need an elected mayor, the region’s economic leaders have been warned. Sajid Javid, secretary of state for communities and local government said there has to be a credible figurehead for economic growth for the Government to be prepared to hand over powers for investment, transport and infrastructure.

He made the stark statement at the South West Growth Summit, a major meeting of business leaders, politicians and academics from across all sectors in the South West.

The assertion comes as all 17 Devon and Somerset councils reach a critical stage in their bid for devolved powers – and the sticking point is the need for an elected mayor.

Mr Javid said that only an elected mayor could bring the kind of ambitions devolution that the region is calling for. To a packed Reed Hall at the University of Exeter, the minister, who is an alumni, said: “If you want an ambitious devolution deal then you have got to have a mayor.”

And he argued that Cornwall’s Devolution Deal without an elected mayor was not ambitious and did not involve any hand over of money. “What’s the point of going down that route?” he said.

Mr Javid called for the region to have one voice on its plans for economic prosperity. In a region that is challenged by disparate communities and historical rivalries, he said: “If you are going to make a success of the south-west that whole attitude has to change.”A region of collaboration and co-operation can make a difference. It has to happen,” he said.

The beauty of the region means as strong reliance on tourism, but it is a double-edged sword, he warned. “It perpetuates the idea that this is a low skill and part-time economy. It is not just a sunny playground for the rest of the country nor a retirement community for Britain’s pensioners.”

He said the 3 million population of Devon, Cornwall, Somerset and Dorset were leading the way in aerospace and creative industries and it is a question of taking that message to the rest of the country and the world.

The South West Growth Summit was hosted by the Pennon Group in conjunction with the Western Morning News and the region’s Local Enterprise Partnerships. The debate held at the event will go on to help form a Growth Charter for the South West, a document that will be presented to the Government ahead of next month’s Autumn Statement.

The region’s MPs joined business leaders to discuss a number of key issues facing the region, including keeping the brightest talent and attracting investment.
Connectivity in terms of mobile and broadband coverage and investment in the road, rail and air routes continue to be high on the agenda.

Chris Loughlin, Chairman of the Pennon Group called for the region to embrace the digital revolution, the kind of business that makes a virtue of working in remote communities.

He said that the region must decide what the South West is and formulate a concept to rival the Northern Powerhouse or Midlands Engine to capture the collective consciousness. “It is essential that we have a clear unified voice to stand up strong for the South West.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/an-elected-mayor-is-the-answer-to-devolution-ambitions-warns-javid/story-29829580-detail/story.html

“Commons watchdog chair Sir Kevin Barron ‘breached’ MPs’ code of conduct “

“The Labour MP in charge of overseeing ethical standards for MPs has been found to have breached a committee’s code of conduct.

Sir Kevin Barron, the chairman of the standards committee, accepted payment for hosting events for a drug company in Parliament.

However, the committee has recommended that no further action is required against Sir Kevin after they concluded that the breach had been “minor” and “inadvertent”.

In March he announced that he had referred himself to Kathryn Hudson, the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner, over the disclosures which were first revealed in the Telegraph.

The fees received by Sir Kevin after sponsoring three events in Parliament were donated to charity, and Ms Hudson concluded the breach of the rules was “at the least serious end of the spectrum” because the MP did not personally benefit.

The report recommended that no further action was required against the Labour MP, who stood aside while the committee examined his case, and the inquiry had raised “no doubts over Kevin Barron’s integrity and honesty”.

Parliamentary rules prohibit MPs from using Commons resources to “confer any undue personal or financial benefit on themselves or anyone else”.

Sir Kevin said that his fees from the organisation had all been paid to charity, and therefore he had not breached the Code of Conduct.

But Sir Alistair Graham, the former chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, said that members of the committee needed to be “whiter than white” and even if Sir Kevin had not personally received the money, the arrangement was still a breach of the rules.

Lord Bew, the chairman of the committee on standards in public life, has called for an overhaul of the Commons standards committe, warning that it looks like an “insider’s game” in which MPs are “marking their own homework”.

Sir Kevin said: “The report published today has found no serious breaches as I always maintained. The inquiry has found a ‘minor’ and ‘inadvertent’ breach of a banqueting rule. I felt that I had taken all the steps I could to check the rules, but acknowledge my mistake.

“Just to make it absolutely clear, this arrangement led to no personal financial gain as payment was made, as a donation, to a local children’s hospice in my constituency.

“I would like to thank Kathryn Hudson, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, for her very thorough investigation into this matter and the Committee on Standards for their judgment.

“I will be resuming my duties as chair of the Committee on Standards and the Committee of Privileges. It has always been a huge honour to chair these committees and I am delighted to return to this role.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/20/commons-watchdog-chair-sir-kevin-barron-breached-mps-code-of-con/

Swire’s question in Parliament today – not about NHS or East Devon

Swire’s priority:

Sir Hugo Swire, a Conservative, asks if May will back the first ever meeting of Commonwealth trade ministers.

May says the government applauds this and is looking for trade deals with the Commonwealth. It wants to make a success of Brexit.”

And what a WASTE of a question! Was May REALLY likely to say: “The government thinks this is really daft and it wants to sabotage Brexit”?

No, it was one of those brown-nose, planted questions to make the government look good.

Swire on the NHS in Parliament – prepare to be shocked

Owl only had time to make quick notes on what Swire said about the NHS in Devon in the Parliamentary debate this afternoon. It will appear on BBC iplayer later so you can see for yourself.

Martyn Oates, Spotlight reporter, gave an overview of the afternoon with a few short clips of the debating chamber.

North Devon MPs said there was a crisis, especially in their area, there was not enough funding. Tory MP Cox said it funding was inadequate.

The ?Minister of State (Dunne) admitted it was a “challenging situation”.

Swire began by saying he thought the Minister was in a difficult situation as the plan is out for consultation [so why organise the debate if the Minister can’t say anything!] but it was good to see the Devon MPs there.

He said “we are where we are” [duh!] and “we have to make do” and it is a “process of change”, continuing with “we need a genuinely 21st century NHS”.

He toed the party line that the NHS had already been given an extra £8 billion for the year and then an extra £2 billion extra and Mrs May has said there is no more money.

Martyn Oates asked him for a comment on what Neil Parish MP had said [a flattering direct quote from Owl earlier this week on this blog] who said they should not be pitting themselves against each other hospital by hospital but fighting for them all.

Swire said that it should not become a “Dutch auction”. That was a bit difficult to understand for Owl, as a Dutch auction is one where the price (in this case number of hospitals) goes down and down till a buyer is found (or in this a minimum number is reached?) for what remains of them. As Swire IS championing keeping only Sidmouth hospital beds open, not keeping all Devon’s beds open, he is actually guilty of making it into what he says it should not be – some sort of auction – Dutch or Double-Dutch, who knows?

But Swire is an ex-auctioneer, so maybe he can explain that to us!

He then made what Owl considered a very snide remark about Parish being OK as, whatever happened, the 24 bed Tiverton hospital in his constituency would remain whilst saying NOTHING about the fact that Parish’s constituency is definitely losing beds at Honiton and could lose those at Seaton leaving his part of East Devon with no beds at all – Axminster already having list theirs).

He said there is a role for ” much-loved” hospitals but what that role is remains to be seen [double duh!].

He then finished with what he keeps repeating and which we must challenge: he said it is NOT true that a hospital without beds us not a hospital.

EAST DEVON: we MUST get this constituency out of this man’s hands.

“Opposing Brexit should be made an act of ‘treason’ punishable by life in prison, Tory councillor says in petition”

Opposing Brexit should be made an act of “treason” and be punishable by life in prison, a Conservative councillor has suggested in a petition to Parliament.

Guildford councillor Christian Holliday’s petition, on the House of Commons website, calls for an amendment to the Treason Felony Act to make supporting UK membership of the European Union a crime.

He has since been suspended by the leader of Guildford Borough Council.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/17/opposing-brexit-should-be-made-an-act-of-treason-punishable-by-l/

Owl has just two questions:

How the heck did he become LEADER? Is the gene pool so bereft of talent in a place as big as Guildford, people such as him rise to the top?

and

If it can happen in Guildford – in how many other places is it happening and being covered up by Whips? Hhhmmm!

NHS: on the point of collapse – now ‘eternal winter’

Back to Chomsky:
“That’s the standard technique of privatization: defund, make sure things don’t work, people get angry, you hand it over to private capital.”

“Waiting times in A&E units in England this summer have been worse than every winter for the past 12 years bar one, figures show.

The colder months have traditionally been the most difficult for hospitals.

But pressures have grown so much that this summer saw one in 10 patients wait for over four hours in A&E during June, July and August.

Only last winter saw a worse performance since the target started in 2004, figures from NHS England showed.

During the summer months 90.6% of patients were seen in four hours. Hospitals are meant to deal with 95% in four hours.
The data also showed hospitals are missing a number of other key targets for cancer, routine operations and ambulance response times.

And the delays hospitals experienced in August discharging patients reached a record high. There were over 188,000 days of delays – a 30% rise on the same month the year before.
These delays occur when there are no services available in the community to care for frail patients on release.

Dr Mark Holland, president of the Society for Acute Medicine, said the figures once again showed the NHS was locked in an “eternal winter”.

“The NHS is on its knees and, this winter, areas will implode around the country. There is no reserve left.
“Over the coming weeks and months, if we see a major increase in admissions due to flu or bed closures due to norovirus, we will collapse.” …”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-37634687

Two mid-Devon Conservative councillors removed from committees following investigation

News announced in a press release, presumably from the council, that very carefully excludes the reasons why they were removed:

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/two-mid-devon-conservative-councillors-removed-from-committees-following-investigation/story-29809275-detail/story.html

Hugo Swire bans Claire Wright from a meeting in her ward

“Hugo Swire bars me from a meeting about Tipton St John Primary School flooding problems

I was bizarrely barred from a meeting in my own ward this lunchtime, with East Devon’s MP and the chief executive of the Environment Agency, James Bevan, who met with Tipton St John school staff about the ongoing challenges of flooding at the school – an issue I have been active on for three years.

I have been involved in discussions on how the situation at Tipton St John may be remedied since I was elected as a Devon County councillor in 2013.

I asked to attend the meeting this morning, however, was informed by Hugo Swire’s office that I would not be welcome as he was “keeping the meeting very small and focused and had to limit numbers.”

I was very disappointed about being excluded as crucially important issues would be discussed that I have been actively involved with. Last year I provided funding from my county council locality budget for a flood survey and helped to clear up after at least two flooding events, arranging with the chief fire officer for Devon and Somerset, for the fire and rescue service to be involved in these clear ups.

I have attended meetings with residents about the future of the school and worked with the school – and the community on trying to find a solution to the flooding problems.

As the Devon County councillor for Tipton St John with a clear interest and involvement in supporting the community I would have thought it was entirely appropriate that I should have been invited to a meeting with the chief executive of the Environment Agency.

It was a poor decision”

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/hugo_swire_bars_me_from_a_meeting_about_tipton_st_john_primary_school_flood

Swire challenges “opposition”

…””My local political opposition [is] going to find it rather difficult to criticise me now… I’m afraid I’m going to slightly shoot their fox,” he says.

“Because all the things they say I don’t comment on, I now can and am… I no longer have to support the government.”

Topping the agenda in his newly assumed role as a backbencher is the region’s ailing infrastructure.

He shares the view that for too long the Westcountry has “suffered unfairly” from underinvestment.

“Just imagine if HS2 wasn’t going to go ahead – how much money that would release for the kind of infrastructure development we need in the South West,” he states.

“We had a good meeting with Network Rail and GWR this week, looking at their new rolling stock and the challenges to upgrade the line. [But] that’s something we’re going to have to really watch and make sure the funding is in place.”

He is also following developments with Devon Success Regime, including the campaign to keep beds in the local community hospital.

And he wants to make sure the region catches up with the roll-out of superfast broadband services.

“Every single Conservative candidate in the South West was elected on a Conservative manifesto, and it is up to every single member of Parliament to ensure their delivery is as good as their pledge,” he says.

Going from being one of he most well-travelled ministers in Government to a member of the “rank and file” has taken some getting used to.

The responsibilities associated with Mr Swire’s previous role made him heavily reliant on staff to manage his diary and provide briefings. Now, he admits he often struggles to make it to meetings on time.

However, he is staying involved with international affairs as deputy chairman of the Commonwealth Enterprise and Investment Council and head of the Conservative Middle East Council.

He says he hopes to see the UK taking more of a lead on Syria – pointing out that it would be a “wonderful opportunity” for Boris Johnson “to show what hes made of”.

“You’ve got Putin.. responsible for some biblical atrocities [and] I weep for the people of Syria,” he says. “This is a good opportunity for Britain to show some leadership.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/no-plans-for-a-quiet-retirement-to-the-backbenches-for-devon-mp/story-29806840-detail/story.html

Er, not quite true Hugo – your work with the Conservative Middle East Council seems to be taking up an awful lot of your time – breakfast meeting the Egyptian Ambassador (London), talking at a Conservative fundraising dinner in Kensington and Chelsea (London), meeting about Christians in Syria (London), chatting to the Saudi Foreign Minister … still busy on non- constituency matters in London.

And heaven only knows how busy you will be as deputy chairman of the Commonwealth Enterprise and Investment Council!

Oh, and as for getting to meetings on time – don’t forget to add in the time it takes to get from your mid-Devon second home to your constituency.

“Greater Exeter” – the fun starts here

Other Chief Executives and Senior Officers of “Greater Exeter” will no doubt demand parity – or better …

“Councillors ‘unaware’ of Teignbridge chief’s 12% pay rise”

The ruling Conservative group said Nicola Bulbeck’s rise reflected her additional responsibilities.

Councillors said they were unaware of a proposal to increase a chief executive’s pay by 12% – taking it to £141,000 – before it was passed.
Nicola Bulbeck’s £15,000 pay rise has been called “excessive” by opposition Liberal Democrat politicians on Teignbridge District Council.

But the ruling Conservative group said information about the rise was given to all councillors in June.

Lib Dems said they had not “knowingly” approved the rise last month.

More on the council row, plus more Devon and Cornwall news
The Conservatives said the rise reflected additional responsibilities for Ms Bulbeck.

It followed a cut to the number of posts in the council’s senior management team from 18 to six.

Liberal Democrat leader Gordon Hook said: “A meeting a couple of weeks ago had a report to members and there was a web link to the statement of accounts.

“On page 84 there is one line about the chief executive’s salary increase.

“There was no indication it was in the booklet or that the information was going to be brought as an item to members, which it should be.

“We accepted the report, but we were given no lead that that was part of the package.”

Councillor Jeremy Christophers, leader of Teignbridge District Council, said that the rise, which includes pension contributions of £22,000, had “always been available and updated on the website”.

“Figures have been publicly available in the annual accounts since June and were presented at audit scrutiny committee on 21 July and 14 September and full council on 26 September.
“Teignbridge proactively and routinely publishes all possible data to enhance our transparency and accountability and help residents understand how we work and the services we provide,” he said.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-37642347

A tale of two AONBs

A gas-fired power station has been proposed for the East Devon village of Hawkchurch on the East Devon- West Dorset border NEAR an AONB (Area of outstanding Natural Beauty) in Dorset. It was not put out to consultation to the local community.

West Dorset MP Oliver Letwin says of it:

This development will have an impact on the West Dorset AONB.

“I do not believe it is appropriate, or in line with national planning policy, for industrial installations to be located in ways that have such impact on landscape of national importance. I hope, therefore, that this application will be refused.”

Councillor tries to extend consultation period on ‘power station’

In East Devon, an industrial site is being planned WITHIN the AONB at Sidford – after it had been agreed that it would not be allowed in the Local Plan but slipped in because officers did not offer up evidence to a Planning Inspector to remove it.

The local MP, Hugo Swire, has said …

… absolutely nothing at all.

Neil Parish knows exactly how to drum up post-Brexit trade!

Question in Parliament yesterday:

Does my hon. Friend agree that what is different about having a new royal yacht now is that we are sailing into a brave new world, and that we will do, and need to do, many more trade deals across the world? There is a great opportunity not only to support the royal family, but to support the nation in getting those trade deals

His other parliamentary questions in 2016 have covered. Bear in mind he is a dairy farmer and Chairman of the Commons Transport Committee.

Summary: good to have onside if you are a farmer or use the A303 a lot. Not so good if you are an ordinary voter desperately trying to get on the housing ladder or a struggling seaside town in his area (Seaton is in his constituency) or a pensioner worried about your current or future health!

To be fair: he did speak up at the Feniton development public inquiry – but his written questions fo reflect his major interests:

Questions 2016

The Swansea tidal lagoon – two questions this year
Olympics and doping
Hybrid cars
Veal
Congratulations to Ministers
Broadband – several questions
EU sanctions on Russia
Bsdger Culling
Milk prices
Dualling A303/ West Country roads – many questions.
Eating Well
The dairy industry
Universal Credits
Working with industry instead of bringing in a sugar tax
Stimulating venture capital investment
Farming in general – many similar questions
Police grants
Renewable heat
Onshore gas and shale extraction
Flooding ( after Somerset floods)
Biofuels
Rural areas

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?pid=24779&pop=1&p=5

How to kill a town

This is about Totnes, but could be any town, anywhere:

“There are three easy ways to destroy a town.

First – relax the planning laws so that developers can build what they want, where they want.

Two – build huge amounts of houses all at once, all over the fields surrounding the town; infill any green space inside; make sure the houses obscure everyone else; make sure they are all unaffordable to local people, but attractive to second home owners and buy to let investors; make sure you don’t provide any new infrastructure, no new schools, hospital places, improvements to roads, to sewers; make sure that local industries; the marina, the last dairy farm are closed down and covered in new, ugly boxes with no gardens and in regimented rows.

[Three] You’re nearly there now! Make sure that the roads are so congested with new cars that traffic can’t move and then for your final flourish, sell off its most treasured, vital area, in the case of Totnes, the market and the garden and the central car parks without which a town such as Totnes cannot function.

Wonderful, you’re there. You have successfully choked an ancient and very special place to death; you look at the million pound houses replacing the marina and it looks good; you look at the tacky tacky boxes spreading out over the hillside along the river and you smile to yourself, who needs farmers, they’re mucky – we can buy all we need from the huge industrial intensive farming block in Hampshire. Who needs a market?

The Black Prince may well have given this ancient town a charter, but that was such a long time ago, who needs history? Who needs tourism, there must be other jobs these people can do, well it doesn’t really matter, once we’ve got the locals out and replaced them almost entirely with second home owners, then we won’t be bothered with their complaints – black windows all winter are a bonus.

Look at Salcombe, 70% second homes and no trouble at all. All those ridiculous transition people with their big ideas and their trying to live responsibly, there’s no money to be made in that, what’s the matter with them.

No, lets make sure we do to Totnes what we have done so successfully in the past to Torbay and towns like Newton Abbot, there’s nothing quite so satisfying as ripping the heart out of a marvellous old place and replacing that heart with concrete…”

https://allengeorgina.wordpress.com/2016/10/12/how-to-kill-a-town-a-how-to-guide/

Take control …

“Take control” are two of the most potent words in our language that have come to mean just one thing in the weeks since the Brexit vote.

But the desire for more control over our lives is not the exclusive preserve of Leave voters – and nor can it or should it be confined to the issue of immigration.

Our polling shows that people from all backgrounds and with every kind of belief now feel they have lost control over what matters most to them, whether it is the price of a home, the pace of technological change or the poisoning of our planet.

Far from being supporters of the status quo, a clear majority of remain supporters specifically identify big business and corporate elites as having “too much power over their lives”.

By an even bigger margin of 62%, those who voted remain in the referendum say that only a few people in power take all the big decisions, adding that there is not much the average citizen can do about it.

Those decisions now seem further out of reach than ever for millions of people after the party conference season. The government has confirmed its determination to pursue a hard Brexit, even though that risks making matters worse for people who already feel left behind in this economy.

At the same time, many people see opposition parties as being in disarray and deeply divided, leaving some to despair at the prospects for progressive politics ever providing answers, let alone getting the chance to put them into practice.

A storm in our economy and our democracy that has been gathering for decades is now firmly upon us. A torrent of wealth of power is washing away even the fragile footholds people had established in the economy. Many more now face losing control all together in the face of global, technological and climate change.

Yet, even in the midst of all this upheaval, a surge of energy is being generated that can crack open new possibilities for people to take more control right now – not at some distant point in the future.

The New Economics Foundation seeks to give people the tools to take control and change their lives for the better
Today, the New Economics Foundation is setting out ways to shift debate beyond secret negotiations over Brexit in the capitals of Europe, seemingly endless party infighting in Westminster’s opposition, or literal fights in Brussels over whose turn it is next to lead Ukip.

Instead, we are setting out an agenda for people to take control themselves, without having to wait for government to do it for – or to – them.

Our agenda for people draws on real experiences, ranging from those in seaside communities who feel abandoned by the political elite, taxi drivers in London trying to make a living in an Uber-ised economy, small businesses starved of finance, consumers overcharged for energy, and young families hoping for their first home or worried about the cost of childcare.

It seeks to give all of them the tools they need to take control and change their lives for the better. Coastal communities will find ways to revive a clean marine economy which brings together people who care about the environment with those who care about getting decent jobs. We are helping to develop a new taxi app owned and controlled by drivers themselves, from London to Leeds, to give them the chance to share in the vast new digital value being created around us.

The foundation is also drawing up plans to turn the scandal-torn RBS into 130 stakeholder banks that serve local firms rather than expecting them to serve it. We have teamed up with the Switched On London campaign to help communities generate renewable and affordable energy that gives them a real stake in a low-carbon future.

Furthermore, in a project with Citizens UK, we are creating the first maps of vacant public land available for the houses that need to get built. And we are helping parents expand the number of childcare co-operatives so they can not only afford a service fundamental to modern working lives, but also exercise more control over it.

This is not an agenda merely for clicktivists who think change happens on a smartphone screen on the way to a rally. We recognise that the tools people need to take control must be fashioned in partnership with institutions wielding real power, ranging from devolved government, city mayors and forward-looking businesses to trade union and community-led campaigns across the country.

But this is the first time a major thinktank has set itself a bigger ambition than merely influencing ministers or future legislation, or getting included in a political party’s manifesto.

The New Economics Foundation will focus on helping people and communities take control by engaging with new partners – from the Mayor of London and Google DeepMind to the GMB and Citizens UK – to explore new possibilities for change right now.

We are rooted outside the traditional boundaries of politics. We care most about people’s everyday experience. And we will work with communities of all kinds to give them the tools they need to build a better future because there has never been a more urgent need for a new economy than right now.”

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/11/politicians-housing-employment-childcare-control-new-economics-foundation

“Information not held”

Freedom of Information requests to East Devon District Council on the whatdotheyknow website:

“EDDC policy and guidance on conducting public consultations
Response by East Devon District Council to tim todd on 23 March 2016.
Information not held.

Request for information that supports ‘success’ claims made by Cllr Moulding (Premier Inn)
Response by East Devon District Council to tim todd on 29 April 2016.
Information not held.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/east_devon_district_council

Hard-working MP

Hugo Swire has put nothing on his MP web page since a very lukewarm response to East Devon bed closures on 22 September, after which he was made Chairman of the Conservative Middle East Council.

He has done 19 tweets since then: 10 on national or international issues and 9 on local issues – including 5 retweets from other sources.

His three latest (written) questions to Parliament were all about penalties for using mobile phones whilst driving:

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?pid=11265&pop=1#n4

According to his official MP page his wife, who is his paid assistant at £35,000-£39,999 pa, does his website and press releases, though we don’t know if she also does any of his tweets:

http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/exclusive_hugo_swire_mp_in_the_herald_s_hot_seat_1_452145

Perhaps his wife is on holiday.

Many more peers than MPs

The net operating costs of the House of Lords in 2013-4 were £93.1m, approximately equivalent to £118,000 per Peer. So whilst on the basis of allowances and expenses, an additional 100 Peers would cost almost £2.6m, this is likely an underestimate of their true costs. 24 Aug 2015″

A VERY easy thing for Mrs May to fix. Will she fix it?

“The growing size of the House of Lords has become increasingly controversial. Under David Cameron’s premiership, membership rose from just over 700 members to well beyond 800 in just six years, and he appointed to the chamber at a faster rate than any other prime minister since life peerages began (see page 13 here for figures to 2015). Both the Lords’ size and rate of appointments have frequently attracted fierce press criticism. Public figures expressing concern in recent months have included the Chair of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, Lord Bew, and the outgoing Lord Speaker, Baroness D’Souza.

Just in case Prime Minister Theresa May was in doubt about the strength of feeling on this issue, the incoming Lord Speaker Lord (Norman) Fowler began his term by strongly speaking out for change. Fowler was formerly a cabinet minister under Margaret Thatcher, and party chairman under John Major, so has significant gravitas in Conservative circles. In a BBC interview on 16 September he suggested ‘that by the next election, [the Lords] should be at a number that is just less than the House of Commons’, emphasising how the current situation is damaging to parliament’s reputation. A particularly sensitive contextual issue is that the Commons is itself due to shrink in 2020, from 650 MPs to 600, under the government’s proposed boundary changes. In an interview for the House Magazine (reproduced on Politics Home) Fowler commented that ‘I don’t think that we can justify a situation where you have over 800 peers at the same time as you’re bringing down the Commons to 600 MPs’. Conservative chair of the House of Commons Procedure Committee Charles Walker has gone further, suggesting that getting the Lords below 600 should be made a condition for voting the boundary changes through. A cross-party group of peers is pressing for the Lords to vote on the principle of being no larger than the Commons in the near future (notably the UK is the only bicameral country in the world where the second chamber is larger than the first). Conservative chair of the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Bernard Jenkin, has meanwhile asked his committee to launch an inquiry into Lords numbers and appointments.

So this appears to be a reform whose time has come. But the key question is how best to reduce from 800+ members to 600. To succeed, any such reduction must be both sustainable and seen to be fair. Here I argue that this requires four interconnected things: a large number of departures before 2020, a long-term cap on the size of the House, limitations on future appointments, and an agreed principle of balance between the parties (and other groups). Without all four, any attempted reform is doomed to fail.”

http://www.democraticaudit.com/2016/10/11/800-peers-and-counting-how-can-we-cut-the-size-of-the-house-of-lords/