Business Rate reform: a big problem for rural councils

“Funding for public services will become “highly variable” in many county areas under government plans to make councils financially self-sufficient by the end of the decade, government has been warned.

In an analysis of the plan to fully devolve business rate revenue, undertaken for the County Councils Network, Pixel Finance Management found the growth in net business rates in these areas was below average.

In many counties, particularly in rural areas, small businesses often claim reliefs. As a result, a growth in business premises often does not translate into a growth in business rate income received by the local authority in county areas.

The government plans to devolve business rates to authorities by 2019-20. A funding baseline is likely to be set for town halls using local business rates as well as either a top up or tariff payment to reflect a new assessment of local need. Authorities will then retain all local growth, up from the 50% share currently allotted to the sector, and will be financially self-sufficient, with other locally raised revenue, mainly council tax, used to provide services.

However, the review highlighted the volatility of business rate income, which fell in three large counties between 2010 and 2016, despite the fact they all make large contributions to the national economy. Surrey contributed £37bn in gross value added to the UK economy in 2014, but its business rate income fell by almost 15% between 2010 and 2016. Meanwhile, Hertfordshire contributed £32bn, but its business rate fell by 11% in the same periods, and Kent contributed £31bn but its business rate income fell by 5%.

In addition, rateable values per head in London average £3,700 compared to £851 in county areas, while revenues within a county can also vary widely. In one county, the research showed growth in rateable values was as high as 20%, with four other districts witnessing reductions of over the same period.

CCN vice chair and finance spokesman David Borrow said he welcomed the localisation, but warned that a well-intentioned policy could end up being unfair, with areas outside the major conurbations being left behind other parts of the country.

If the new system is not properly designed, it could leave already-underfunded services for the vulnerable and elderly in county areas worse off, at a time of growing demand, particularly for adult social care. …

… Currently, retained rates are split 80-20 to districts in two tier areas, and CCN said it was working closely with the District Councils Network on a submission for a retention system in two-tier areas. The group also said that the design of the new regime needed to include safety nets for when revenue falls, and allow for frequent resets of the localisation system to ensure urban areas such as London do not receive disproportionate funding allocations.

CCN, which represents 27 councils, also called for increased fiscal freedoms, including the ability to increase business rates – even for areas that do not have an elected mayor, which would not be allowed under current plans.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/08/counties-warn-funding-uncertainty-business-rates-localisation

“Greater Exeter” protects the countryside – honestly, that’s what they say!

And it must be true, because Andrew Moulding says so! Now, about Exmouth Splat … And look who the money is coming from: developers!

Teignbridge, East Devon District Councils and Exeter City Council have form a cross-boundary partnership to safeguard three internationally important conservation sites.

The three councils have established the South East Devon Habitat Regulations Executive committee to off-set the effects of new developments and population growth on the protected sites.

They will work together to protect places such as the Exe Estuary, Dawlish Warren and the East Devon Pebblebed Heaths for future generations to enjoy.
The committee said protecting the sites was important for a number of reasons, including providing safe areas for all users to enjoy and caring for the bird populations they support.

Human activity on or close to the sites can cause disturbance or even death of protected bird species, it warned.

This new Committee is working with partners including Natural England, Clinton Devon Estates, National Trust, RSPB, Exe Estuary Management Partnership and Devon Wildlife Trust.

Funding will come from developer contributions on new residential housing across the three areas and within a 10km “zone of influence” from the protected sites.

Measures and initiatives planned include a patrol boat on the Exe Estuary, a dog project officer, a review of codes of conduct, new and updated visitor publicity and signage.

Two new wardens will educate and engage with the public and ensure byelaws are observed.

East Devon’s deputy leader Andrew Moulding said: “This joint working between our three Councils is a really important step in protecting our beautiful coast and countryside.

“By working together through collective financial decision-making, we can share resources to protect important areas of conservation and improve enjoyment for residents and visitors alike.” …

http://www.rsnonline.org.uk/environment/councils-join-forces-to-protect-countryside

Watch out sports and activities clubs – don’t go the way of beach hut tenants!

EDDC recently put out a puff job press release that said their strategy for beach hut rents (double them) had been so successful that all huts are now rented and waiting lists had plummeted. What they DIDN’T say was that 25% of beach hut tenants had to give up their tenancies because they could not afford the new rents. Beach huts – once a local amenity – are now luxury items available only to those with high disposable incomes (and from anywhere in the world).

Here we have something else in the same guise: a plan to treat all sports and activities clubs who rent their premises from EDDC on “a level playing field” with regard to new rents to be paid.

This roughly translates as “If you are a posh club with a lot of rich members (for example a sailing club) we will hike your rent but you will be fine as you will barely notice it but if you are a poor club with poor members (such as a kids club in a less well-off area) get out of our premises so we can flog them off to the highest bidders – whether for more expensive activities or even to developers”.

This is how you put this in EDDC-speak – will you get a “rent support grant”, who decides and exactly how long will you get it for – if at all?

The press release:

Clubs will all be charged on a level playing field from now on
Sports and activity clubs who rent district council facilities will all be treated on a level playing field from now on and will have the opportunity to apply for a grant to help them in the future.

East Devon District Council has run workshops to help its sports and activity club tenants learn more about how to apply for these grants. During these two sessions attended by eight separate sports and activity club tenants, a number of similar queries came up which officers were able to help with.

Currently, East Devon District Council leases premises to some 37 sports and activity organisations. However, these arrangements, including the rent charges, can vary significantly from club to club due to historical arrangements. Some clubs have benefited from reduced rents while there are others that have not received this financial support. The council’s Cabinet, as recommended by the Asset Management Forum, decided in June 2015 that any financial support for clubs must be more transparent, accountable and reflect a clearly determined subsidy level. Any subsidy involves public money and the Forum wanted to make sure that the best use possible was being made of this financial support. A further information report on the issue went before Cabinet in May this year.

The council’s new approach is to introduce a rent support grant arrangement which will make the allocation of funding support more consistent and fair. From their next rent review or lease renewal date, all clubs will be liable to pay market rent for their facility by the council. At this time, a rent valuation will be determined, taking into account such factors as the size of the facility, the terms of the lease and the variety of uses of the site. In addition, it will be an opportunity to review the current arrangements such as the length of lease.

At the same time, clubs can apply to the district council for a rent support grant and their application will be assessed objectively against a range of criteria. These assessments will include looking at the benefits the club brings or could bring to the local community, whether they have a good and realistic financial plan and how much the club needs a grant.

Clubs that attended the workshops were able to discuss their concerns with the Council. There are ones that are trying hard to recruit new members and improve their club and facilities by building up money to pay for these improvements but worried that they might not be eligible for a grant. Officers were able to reassure these clubs that the decision-making panel of councillors would be looking to give grants to help clubs that were putting a real effort into helping themselves. This includes activities such as applying for grants, involving their clubs in the community and becoming more sustainable by recruiting new members and improving facilities.

Ten sports and activity clubs, whose leases are up for renewal this year, are eligible to apply for the Rent Support Grant and now have until 29 September 2016 to submit an application.

Councillor Ian Thomas, East Devon District Council’s Cabinet Member for Finance and the grant applications panel chairman, said: “The workshops were well received and gave us the opportunity to clarify some issues that were worrying these organisations. It’s important to reiterate that the new grants scheme is all about having a fair accountable system to help those who merit financial support. It’s about making sure that our limited funds reach the right groups and organisations.”

All sports and activity clubs that lease or hire facilities from East Devon District Council have already received detailed information on the changes and the grants scheme.”

Sidmouth Beach Management Plan – crucial meeting this Wednesday (17 August)

“As Sidmouth’s long-drawn-out Beach Management Plan (BMP) reaches a critical stage, all eyes will be on the Steering Group Meeting this week, with EDDC Deputy Leader, Andrew Moulding, in the Chair.

Vision Group for Sidmouth (VgS), one of the founder groups of Save Our Sidmouth, will be represented by Robert Crick, who has followed every stage of the long and fraught evolution of the BMP, and has a sound knowledge of researched solutions. He was a close colleague of Jo Frith, who died earlier this year. Jo had been the VgS representative on the BMP Steering Group for many years, strongly arguing a ‘best solution’ case, with solid suggestions for funding.

For the issues and controversies, see:
https://www.visionforsidmouth.org/news/2016/august/beach-management-plan-minutes-from-ff-vgs-meeting-of-8th-august.aspx
https://www.visionforsidmouth.org/news/2016/august/beach-management-plan-local-stakeholders-welcome-project-consultants-report.aspx
and http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/d_day_looms_on_option_to_protect_85m_of_sidmouth_property_1_4653525

Extended National Park boosts tourism, but NEVER for East Devon

Yorkshire, Lancashire, Cumbria and Dorset value their natural environments:

http://rsnonline.org.uk/environment/rural-boost-as-national-parks-extended

East Devon guards its developers and their concrete jungles jealously:

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2016/08/08/control-of-assets-more-important-than-creating-a-national-park-says-eddc/

Top designer offers help with new Exmouth seafront ideas

“Wayne Hemingway is willing to visit Exmouth and share his thoughts on the Queens Drive development.

The East Devon District Council project is currently on hold after a shock announcement the site would be re-tendered because of a lack of progress on the part of original developer, Moirai Capital Investments.

Environmental community group Transition Exmouth contacted the noted designer following the decision. …

… As well as having a good record on community involvement, Wayne demonstrates a sensitivity to traditional seaside entertainments and locales which is why he would be the ideal person to involve in the consultation guiding the revised Masterplan for Exmouth.

He added: “Transition Exmouth calls on Cllr. Philip Skinner, Chair of Exmouth Regeneration Board and Chair of Exmouth Coastal Communities Team to demonstrate a willingness to listen to an outside expert and himself issue the invitation to Wayne Hemingway to visit our town.”

Hemingway has indicated that he is willing to visit Exmouth and has suggested a date, requesting only a formal invite.

The council has outline planning permission to develop the Queen’s Drive site to include a cafe and public open space, retail units, a hotel or holiday accommodation, car parking, and indoor and outdoor play facilities.

This includes the water sports centre at the front of the Queen’s Drive site, where the council has forged a partnership with Grenadier Estates for the proposed new £4 million community-owned centre.

This project is hoped to be under way early 2017.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/iconic-designer-wayne-hemingway-willing-to-offer-thoughts-on-exmouth-seafront-development/story-29613485-detail/story.html

An interesting Freedom of Information request

Cost of using external law firms and barristers

Date submitted: 24 May 2016

Summary of request

I would like to know the amount of money the council spent on the services of external law firms and barristers over each of the last two years (years ending March 31 2015 and March 31 2016).

Summary of response

External spend on legal fees, including barristers for 2014/2015 = £353,060.78

External spend on legal fees, including barristers for 2015/2016 = £79,053.34

Date responded: 14 June 2016

Just a bit of a jump – and all of it OUR money

PegasusLife – new and bigger plans for Knowle

Revised plans = new consultation?

“Pegasus Life’s latest revised plans for Knowle now submitted.

A string of Pegasus Life’s revised plans and statements for the Knowle, have just been uploaded (10th Aug) to the EDDC Planning portal.

To view, go to https://planning.eastdevon.gov.uk/online-applications/, type in reference 16/0872/MFUL, and search Documents.

Have all the many issues*, not least size, scale and suitability of design, now been addressed?

For two examples of the latter, submitted yesterday, see Document 239415, pages 11-14, showing impact from the south park, and Document 2391414, pages 20-22, impact on upper Knowle Drive.

See information in earlier posts:

*https://saveoursidmouth.com/2016/06/15/knowle-planning-application-breaks-a-raft-of-local-plan-rules-says-vgs/
*https://saveoursidmouth.com/2016/06/13/knowle-drive-after-pegasus-life-plans-a-question-of-perspective/
*https://saveoursidmouth.com/2016/05/30/throwing-away-our-heritage-london-based-save-vehemently-objects-to-plans-for-knowle/

https://saveoursidmouth.com/2016/08/11/pegasus-lifes-latest-revised-plans-for-knowle-now-submitted/

“Greater Exeter” moves on apace – and Greater Plymouth

Local Government is in a particularly fluid and unstable situation at the moment. Brexit is ripping many plans and budgets wide apart, particularly where Local Enterprise Partnerships and local councils were relying heavily on EU funding or EU-based projects, such as Hinkley C.

There have been hints that the new government is not enamoured of some of the devolution bids and that unitary councils (which would see the demise of district councils) may now be back on the table.

Plymouth, the South Hams and West Devon also seem to be working towards a “Greater Plymouth”:

Click to access 201606The_Plymouth_and_South_West_Devon_Joint_Local_Plan_Newsletter_PDF.pdf

Are we seeing the first signs of an anti-unitary move that would allow our two cities to work autonomously rather than Devon-wide? Is it an insurance policy against the increasing powers being grabbed by our LEP?

Whatever it is – it is being done yet again with no consultation and meetings behind closed doors.

Owl wonders what Mrs May thinks of these legacies of Mr Cameron and, more specifically, Mr Osborne.

Here is an up-to-date post on moves towards a “Greater Exeter”:

In a previous post

Whose Vision is it anyway? Part 1

I highlighted the flamboyantly named Greater Exeter Visioning Board, announced with a fanfare of trumpets and then shifted off into the dark shadows of proceedings held behind firmly closed doors. This post reports the uncomfortable outcome of my further investigations.

Having been told by Exeter City Council that the minutes of the Visioning Board were not made public, I asked some more questions. The City Council’s answers are below.

Q1: Under what authority the board was established and who agreed its terms of reference?

A1: A Memorandum of Understanding was agreed by the Leaders and Chief Executives of Exeter City Council, East Devon District Council and Teignbridge District Council in November 2014. The Memorandum of Understanding is not a legally binding document but all parties use all reasonable endeavours to comply with the terms and spirit of the Memorandum of Understanding.

Q2: The reasons for its decision not to publish agendas and minutes?

A2: Many of the issues that are discussed at the Board relate to the growth of the Greater Exeter area. It is considered that the board needs to be able to have open discussions through which they can develop ideas, debate live issues and reach decisions. Disclosure of these discussions may inhibit the imparting or commissioning of advice, or the offering or requesting of opinions for consideration.

Q3: Whether it reports its proceedings to councillors and, if so, what opportunities are open to councillors to scrutinise its work?

A3: Council Leaders and Deputy Leaders from each of the three authorities sit on the board.

Q4: If it does not report its proceedings to councillors, to whom is the board accountable?

So what’s next?

We can at least now speculate what the Visioning Board was up to. On 12 July, the City Council’s Executive (the lead councillors) discussed a report by the Assistant Director City Development which set out proposals for establishing:

“a joint strategic plan for the Greater Exeter area which would be prepared in partnership between East Devon District Council, Exeter City Council, Mid Devon District Council and Teignbridge District Council with assistance from Devon County Council. The plan would cover the geographical area of the 4 partner authorities (excluding the area of Dartmoor National Park) but would be limited in scope to cover strategic issues and strategic allocations within those areas with local issues to be considered through linked local plans prepared by each partner authority for their area.” [1]

This was nodded through and then approved by the full Council on 26 July.

In a future post I will explore the challenges for serious public engagement presented by this form of joint working. For the moment, let’s just say that the gestation of this proposal behind closed doors, and the underlying assumption that joint planning is a technocratic issue rather than something which asks the communities what sort of Greater Exeter we want (if indeed we want one at all) does not augur well.

Or is there another agenda?

Of course, I might be completely wrong, and the Greater Exeter Visioning Board has been discussing something completely different. But if so, what? A Greater Exeter Unitary Authority perhaps? There is an obvious link between the joint strategic plan proposal and the so-called “Devolution” bid for spending powers to be transferred from central government to the “Heart of the South West”, made up of Devon County Council, Somerset County Council, Torbay Council and Plymouth City Council [2]. The district councils like Exeter are at present secondary players in this, a position with which Exeter for one is not comfortable.

NOTES:

[1] The full report is at http://committees.exeter.gov.uk/documents/s52597/EXECUTIVE%20-%20Proposed%20Greater%20Exeter%20Strategic%20Plan%20-%2012%20July%202016%20-%20FINAL.pdf

[2] I will have more to say about the “Devolution” bid in a later post . Meanwhile a useful update is at item 76 of the minutes of the Exeter City Council Executive meeting on 12 July, at http://committees.exeter.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=112&MId=4469&Ver=4

Source: https://agreeninexeter.com

That’s what friends are for …

The “council Chief” has not seen fit to intervene in the closure of any other banks in East Devon but no doubt chats with his high-profile Vice-Chairman Helen Parr (Colyton) at EDDC he has felt he must do what he can to help.

Other towns look forward to a similar intervention by the two of them on their behalf should their remaining banks be threatened with closure.

DCC Councillor Claire Wright recently wrote to Lloyds Chairman begging him not to close the branch in Ottery:

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/lloyds_bank_chief_executive_urged_to_retain_otterys_branch_in_face_of_cuts

Councillor Hughes (also a DCC councillor with highways responsibility) does not appear to have offered his support there.

Council chief joins fight to save Colyton bank

East Devon District Council chairman Stuart Hughes has thrown his weight behind Colyton’s fight to save its Lloyds Bank branch from 
closure.

Members of St Andrew’s Parish Church recently wrote to the company’s chairman, Lord Norman Blackwell, appealing to him to reverse his decision to pull out of the town.

In their letter, the rector, the Reverend Hilary Dawson and her two church wardens, Christine Sansom and David Fouracre, said: “It would appear in the world of big business, small is not beautiful. However, to a community like ours, such a facility is crucial.

“We have a predominately elderly population living in a rural location. Many are without private transport, and public transport is infrequent and impractical for those with mobility problems. Many of the elderly are not computer literate, so online banking is not an option for them.

“A large proportion of the Colyton population have banked with Lloyds for many years, primarily because we have a fully functioning bank within the community. Your planned closure of this branch reflects the continued marginalisation of a hitherto thriving rural community.”

Now, in a show of support, Cllr Hughes has echoed parishioners’ concerns in a further letter to Lord Blackwell. He wrote: “Small branches like the one in Colyton are vital for rural communities and I am asking that the Lloyds Banking Group gives serious reconsideration to closing it. Such facilities are absolutely key to the life of our communities and we need to keep them open.”

Colyton district councillor Helen Parr added: “Not only will the loss of Lloyds Bank be a blow to personal customers, it will also hit businesses and many organisations and societies. The loss of our only bank would be a serious threat to the economic prosperity of the town.”

http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/council_chief_joins_fight_to_save_colyton_bank_1_4651305

East Devon villages must feed back on EDDC’s plans for their boundaries by 28 September 2016

The expansion of some of East Devon’s most recognisable villages is at the forefront of a new public consultation.

East Devon District Council has begun the eight-week process for its major draft Villages Plan.b The idea is to guide where new developments will go at 14 of the district’s larger villages, as well as the town of Colyton.

Responses will be looked over by the council’s Strategic Planning Committee, before a final version of the plan is produced for yet another consultation.

Locations earmarked for expansion include Beer, Broadclyst, Clyst St. Mary, East Budleigh, Feniton, Kilmington, Musbury, Newton Poppleford, Sidbury, Uplyme, West Hill, Whimple, Woodbury and the town of Colyton.

The Villages Plan will show a black line – the technical term being a Built-up Area Boundary – around the villages.

Within the black line, new houses will generally be acceptable, but outside they will only be acceptable in special circumstances.

The consultation gives the public an opportunity to comment on where the lines should be drawn.

The aim of the council’s planning policy team is to ensure that the main existing built-up areas are included, together with areas that have already been agreed for development – either through planning permission or planning allocations.

A number of alternatives have already been considered, including not having boundaries, drawing boundaries more tightly or drawing them more loosely.

However, none of these options have been progressed, as they differ from the approach set out in the Local Plan which was adopted in January 2016.

Further research has been undertaken to determine whether the boundaries drawn using the council’s existing criteria should be reduced in areas where it is difficult to access local services and facilities on foot.

This approach is being proposed for Beer, Newton Poppleford, Uplyme and West Hill.

Planning permission is less likely to be granted for new housing and industry that fall into areas outside the black line, but this does not mean that these homes and businesses are not part of a village in any other way.

The Villages Plan does not affect any changes that residents could make to their homes without planning permission.

Councillor Andrew Moulding, who is Chairman of the Strategic Planning Committee, said: “We will consider all the comments that are made before producing an East Devon Villages Plan for further public consultation.

“It will then be formally submitted for consideration by an independent Inspector who will decide whether the plan is sound. It is important that we seek the views of the local communities on this plan, which will help in the determination of planning applications.”

Communities and residents have until Wednesday, September 28 to put forward any comments they wish to make on the draft plan. The Villages Plan will then be submitted for examination by a Planning Inspector.

The draft consultation Villages Plan and supporting documents are available at the council offices at Station Road, Sidmouth, in local libraries, with the relevant parish councils or online here:

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy/villages-plan/villages-plan-2016-consultation/

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/here-s-how-these-14-east-devon-could-expand-and-how-to-have-your-say-on-it/story-29601801-detail/story.html

A lesson in political hypocrisy in Exmouth

Last night, Councillor Bill Nash spoke vehemently at an Exmouth Town Council meeting in favour of the demolition of play facilities in Exmouth to make way for “regeneration” – indeed there was a public spat with another Conservative councillor who was against it.

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2016/08/08/conservative-councillors-in-exmouth-do-not-see-eye-to-eye-it-seems/

However, in his own interest he raised an objection to these plans:

image

The power of whipping?

 

“Control of assets” more important than creating a national park says EDDC

Owl says: how come Dorset is so enthusiastic then? It, too, has assets but seems happy to use them for the greater good.

Of course, assets can be bought by developers … but it is much harder to develop a national park … and our LEP would be very unhappy, as where would those EXTRA 176,000 houses go, over and above those in Local Plans.

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/plans_for_east_devon_national_park_dismissed_as_opportunistic_approach_on_region_s_assets_1_4645079

What ‘Architects Journal’ has to say about Exmouth Splat remarketing!

“If you’re stuck in a sweltering office and need a professional reason for beachfront leisure to be at the forefront of your mind Exmouth could be the answer

East Devon Council is soon to be seeking ‘fresh ideas’ for the coastal town’s Queen’s Drive with £18 million plans by development partner Moirai Capital Investments expected to be cannonballed into the deep blue.

The sun baked site – just metres away from a sandy beach and the cooling waters of the English Channel – had been earmarked for new apartments, retail and a multi-screen cinema.

But after lengthy legal negotiations with site tenants the local authority has decided new concepts are in order and has announced it is considering to re-market the plot.

Now it’s your opportunity to dust off your contacts in the area – Moirai has already declared its intention to rebid – and let your imagination go wild.

Although before you commission a working model water slide or any mankini strewn renders it’s worth considering the brief. The council – seeking the predictable twin pillars of a ‘money making and vibrant’ solution – has in mind wet weather facilities catering for the many non-heatwave days of the year.

Furthermore the site already has outline planning permission for a café, retail units, play facilities and a hotel or holiday accommodation which the council prefers over any residential.”

http://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/competitions/comps-insider-fresh-ideas-sought-for-exmouth-beachfront-plot/10008942.fullarticle

EDDC Freemasons: get that Caribbean spirit and smile!

We know that there are several Freemasons at East Devon District Council. Current declarations of interest show four Freemason councillors: Ian Hall (Axminster), John Humphries (Exmouth), Andrew Moulding (Axminster) and Tom Wright (Budleigh). Officers are not obliged to make Declarations of Interest.

So, EDDC Freemasons – loosen up, smile and go to visit Caribbean or West Africa Lodges to feel the joy! It’s what your Pro Grand Master wants!

“Older freemasons are being told to smile, look like they are enjoying themselves, and avoid criticising as the movement seeks to keep millennial masons happy and halt a decline in membership that has seen lodges closing at a rate of nearly 100 a year for the past decade.

Pro Grand Master Peter Lowndes, second only to the Grand Master the Duke of Kent, the Queen’s cousin, told senior brethren gathered in the Grand Temple, wearing white gloves, aprons and, if suitably qualified, the Royal Arch Breast Jewel: “I am not for one minute suggesting we try to turn our meetings into a pantomime, but most certainly I am saying there is no harm in being seen to enjoy ourselves.” …

… “We can probably all cite instances when a more senior member of a lodge is less than sympathetic to a newer member who has, perhaps, had a few lapses during the ritual. In my view exactly the opposite reaction has the right effect. …

… It’s important in masonry to retain the dignity of what we are doing, but that shouldn’t stop the charity steward making some little quip about old Fred, and everybody laughing …

… “I am in absolutely no doubt, brethren, that, if we encourage and congratulate, rather than routinely castigate our new members we will go a long way to retaining them as members and finally turn around our drop in numbers, which, incidentally, is already happening in some provinces and districts.”

The Pro Grand Master also told the brethren inside the Grand Temple in Freemasons’ Hall that lodges with dwindling numbers could learn from the jollity of members in affiliated districts abroad.

“I have often thought,” said Mr Lowndes, “that if a lodge in this country has lost its way, it could do a lot worse than to get some members to visit some of our districts, particularly, dare I say in West Africa and the Caribbean, to see how much enjoyment can be derived from their meetings.”.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/freemasons-masons-decline-freemasonry-millennial-masons-united-grand-lodge-of-england-conspiracy-a7175966.html

Now you can talk Hugo, remember what you wrote about Knowle planning application

image

EDDC should not grant itself planning permission … probity, accountability, transparency – remember?

East Budleigh: Clinton Devon – 5 houses with FOURTEEN parking spaces in AONB on grade 1 agricultural land

5 houses with no less than FOURTEEN parking spaces, on grade 1 agricultural land in an AONB. Clinton Devon Estates surely you are having a laugh …

Plans for five new homes at East Budleigh have attracted opposition from the parish council.

Clinton Devon Estates is seeking outline planning permission for five new homes, including three affordable homes, on land at Frogmore Road, east of Oak Hill.

The landowner has previously proposed a larger residential development on the site but those plans were withdrawn in the face of local opposition.
f
A local housing needs survey report prepared for Clinton Devon Estates by chartered town planners Bell Cornwell identified a need for at least three to five units of affordable housing in the parish.

The site is on the edge of the village, to the north of Frogmore Road, within the East Devon Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Clinton Devon Estates wants to build two four-bedroom houses for sale on the open market along with two three-bedroom and one two-bedroom affordable homes. The proposals include 14 car parking spaces.

In a planning statement supporting the application, Bell Cornwell said discussions with the parish council about the potential development of the site had been going on for some time. …

… The application was debated by East Budleigh with Bicton Parish Council on Tuesday, July 26. Councillors resolved to object to the plans on the grounds that the application does not provide a sufficient proportion of affordable dwellings relative to open-market housing.

The parish council also objects to building on Grade 1 agricultural land when lower grade agricultural land is available, and to building on what it described as “an environmentally sensitive site, adjacent to a flood zone and inconvenient for access to village facilities”.

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/east-budleigh-homes-plan-faces-parish-council-opposition/story-29565789-detail/story.html

Bring back regular public meetings with politicians and public servants!

An article in today’s Guardian suggests that we need more accountability and transparency from those in public office and suggests that one way to do this is to ensure that our public servants and politicians are put on the spot more often by being expected to attend regular public meetings to explain themselves.

Not the carefully scripted and whipped official committee meetings, where the agenda is tightly controlled and policed, when many of them keep quiet and vote or act like sheep – but situations where they must think on their feet and tell us what they REALLY think (if they think at all).

Imagine if, say once a month, an individual councillor or officer or MP had to be available in the community to answer questions from local electors without warning of what those questions might be!

A few would definitely acquit themselves well – but a great majority in East Devon would definitely be floundering at the first question and thereafter!

An intriguing idea!

” … But social media have not destroyed the public meeting. They have done the opposite. Twitter, Facebook and the rest are indirectly responsible for the glorious revival of the gathering where real people meet in a physical place. For some of us, sitting behind a computer is not enough. We need to get out. What is beyond doubt is that the old-fashioned forum of the public meeting is back and is the perfect counter to social media.


For at least two decades, politicians assumed that a soundbite on the TV news bulletin was what mattered. Oratory as a part of the repertoire disappeared. Politics became technocratic rather than the art form it partly must be. The glory of the public meeting is that there is no escape. A speaker must deliver. The audience is composed of real people. The speaker cannot hide away tweeting alone in a room. People want to be there and need to be there, to be together out of curiosity or as part of what they see as a cause. … ”

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/aug/03/new-big-thing-politics-old-style-public-meeting-labour-battleground-live-events

Taunton Deane + West Somerset = Williton White Elephant?

As recently reported, Taunton Deane amd West Somerset district councils have recently agreed to merge.

This merger came about because West Somerset got into financial trouble. This was almost entirely due to the fact that they decided to build a brand new HQ at Williton (population around 2,600 whereas its biggest town, Minehead has a population of 12,000 and where only a sub-office is available) at a cost, then, of £3.8 million.

With the sharing of staff, and now a full-blown merger, presumably the new HQ will be a complete white elephant.

In the words of Theresa May: ‘Remind you of anybody’?

Oooh … a new road through the Blackdown Hills AONB!

Not IF there will be a new road, but which of two options is preferred:

Devon County Council is developing route options for the scheme and will be holding a two month consultation, starting on Wednesday 3 August and running until Friday 30 September.

The Council is proposing to replace the existing narrow, substandard single carriageway in the Monkton area with around 8km (5 miles) of new road between the Honiton Bypass and Devonshire Inn (the junction of the A30 with the A303).

The scheme will comprise a wide carriageway with 3 lanes. It will be a laid out with two lanes in one direction and one lane in the other to enable overtaking in one direction, alternating along the route.”

Consultation on highway improvements for A30 Honiton to Devonshire Inn

Add that to the refusal by the government to fund faster broadband in the area and one wonders if the Blackdown Hills is finally taking its share of AONB intrusion in East Devon – at last!

Councillor, Leader Diviani’s view (he is DCC and EDDC Councillor for the area):

“I am delighted that Devon County Council is taking such a positive response to our section of the A30. It is such an important part of the region’s connectivity and the proposals will improve the quality of life for all users, whether on long or short distance journeys.”

Exhibitions will be held at the following venues:

Thursday 4 August, 8am-6pm – Honiton Show
Friday 5 August, 2pm-8pm – Upottery Village Hall
Saturday 6 August, 10am-6pm – Upottery Village Hall
Tuesday 16 August, 12pm-8pm – Monkton Court Hotel
Saturday 20 August, 10am-6pm – Mackarness Hall, Honiton
Saturday 10 September, 10am-6pm – Upottery Village Hall