Beware supermarkets bearing gifts – particularly affordable housing!

This is what Tesco promised Seaton in 2009 – see highlighted last paragraph and does the store REALLY have 250 staff:

Sandwiched between the red and white cliffs of the Jurassic Coast and surrounded by acres of unspoilt saltmarsh, the Devon resort of Seaton has prided itself on its status as a serene backwater whose last serious skirmish with an unwanted invader was 700 years ago when it supplied Edward I with ships and sailors to fight off the French.

Yesterday, however, the 7,500 inhabitants of the town on the south Devon coast were readying themselves for a new battle after Tesco bought its largest employer, a holiday village, and promptly ordered its closure. The site also houses Seaton’s only nursery, catering for 35 children, and a swimming pool.

The 152 staff at the Lyme Bay Holiday Village have received redundancy letters informing them that the village, which hosts 40,000 people a year, will close next January to make way for a new development including a large supermarket, a visitor centre and tourist accommodation.

Residents have accused the retail giant, which last year made profits of nearly £2bn, of “breathtaking arrogance” by failing to present any firm proposals for the 15-hectare plot or a timetable for its redevelopment, meaning the town faces the prospect of being without a nursery or housing for the 80 holiday village staff who live on the sites.

Campaigners claim the company, which has said it wants to help make Seaton a “sustainable tourism” centre, has failed to respond to requests for a meeting to discuss its plans and only exercised its option to buy the holiday village after Sainsbury’s, expressed interest last month in acquiring land to build a store.

Lizzie Bewsher, head of a community group opposed to the plans, Stand Up 4 Seaton, said: “In one fell swoop, Tesco have bought up and shut down Seaton’s single biggest source of employment and income. A lot of businesses in the town rely on the passing trade that the holiday village brings in. The people who live in the holiday village face being made homeless and working parents will have nowhere to leave their children. The nearest nursery will be 10 miles away. The village also has the only gym and swimming pool in a town with very few facilities.

“Tesco has done this without offering any assurances that these facilities will be replaced next January or indeed without putting forward any plans for what it wants to do after the closure. It is acting with breathtaking arrogance. We have absolutely no guarantee whatsoever that Tesco will not bulldoze the holiday village, put a big fence around it and leave it untouched for a decade. They are throwing around their financial weight but we are determined not to stand for it.”

One employee said: “We are not by any means a failing business. The village is very popular with the local community and there is a very solid demand throughout the year. There is a lot of ill-feeling that a good business is being closed down without anything firm to replace it.”

If Tesco builds a store in Seaton it will be its tenth outlet within 22 miles. Residents have to travel 18 miles to reach one of its main competitors (Sainsbury’s, Asda or Morrisons), but there is a Waitrose seven miles away.

Tesco said in a statement: “The regeneration of Seaton … will bring significant and lasting benefits to the town, including new employment opportunities, with 250 or more new jobs being created by the new store, attractive shopping facilities and affordable housing. With regard to nursery provision, we are very happy to consider reproviding this service as part of the scheme in conjunction with private operators.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tesco-invades-seaton-ndashclosing-the-nursery-and-holiday-village-800210.html

Boo- hoo, Bovis still too poor to provide affordable housing in Seaton, and yet …

Poor, poor Bovis – literally.

Their housebuilding is going too slowly in Seaton and time is running out on their S106 agreement that reduced affordables on the 300+ housing site from 40% to 25% to 0%. So, they have to put in another submission showing that they simply cannot afford them and EDDC’s “independent valuer” agrees. Officers agree too and it just remains to be rubber-stamped at a forthcoming DMC.

http://planningapps.eastdevon.gov.uk/Planning/lg/dialog.page?Param=lg.Planning&org.apache.shale.dialog.DIALOG_NAME=gfplanningsearch&SDescription=13/1583/V106&viewdocs=true

BUT

In the meantime, councillors on and off the DMC, particularly in Seaton might want to think about it before jumping on that ” too poor” bandwagon:

Guardian 16 February 2016:

Bovis Homes predicts further growth after record profits
Housebuilder increases annual dividend by 14% to 40p a share after pre-tax profits for 2015 jump 20% to £160m”

Bovis Homes has predicted another year of growth after reporting record profits, which were helped by rising house prices and the government’s help to buy scheme.

http://gu.com/p/4hxx3

Yesterday, it was considered a “Buy” stock by Hragreaves Landsdown and Dautsche Bank and HBSC agreed:

http://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-search-results/b/bovis-homes-group-plc-ordinary-50p/broker-forecasts

Goldman Sachs agrees too:

Bovis Homes Group plc (BVS) Earns Buy Rating from Goldman Sachs

Terrible to be so poor isn’t it …

Seaton Heights … hmmm

This is what they say:

The resort will be built in phases, starting with the holiday homes and the leisure complex and should be completed within two to three years depending on how quickly the properties sell. …

David Sullivan, chairman of Lyme Bay Leisure, thanked Seaton and local people for their patience. He said: “’I am sure there have been many cynics who believed this day would never arrive, but we have been absolutely determined to overcome all obstacles sent our way and have been resolute in our determination to make this resort become reality.”

He promised more news in the coming weeks and the full plans will be shared at a public meeting in Seaton Town Hall on a date to be announced.”

Now, all that seems to have been announced is demolition of the old motel on the site which has been deteriorating for years. But there may need to be a bit of a move-on needed as, if construction has not started by May 2018 the planning application will be cancelled and a new application will be needed, as per EDDC’s conditions. Demolition does not constitute constructon start – that is usually signalled by the preparation of footings of actual new buildings.

And there are A LOT of hoops that the developer must jump through before that can happen:

Click to access obj.pdf

Note: Condition 12 states:

12. Prior to the commencement of development (including demolition), the existing access to A3052 shall be permanently closed to vehicles in a manner to be agreed with the Local Planning Authority after consultation with the County Highway Authority and shall be maintained thereafter to prevent its unauthorised usage.
(Reason – In the interest of highway safety in accordance with policy TA7 (Adequacy of Road Network and Site Access) of the East Devon Local Plan.)

Note, too, that the Section 106 requirements do not kick in with demolition:

Click to access obj.pdf

Owl is STILL a cynic but hopes to be proved wrong.

75 bed Premier Inn for Seaton

Planning application 16/0424/MFUL has been validated but documents are not yet online. So far, reaction in Seaton seems unanimously positive, the town having sorely lacked this level of tourist investment. The hotel will be sited on the regeneration area on Harbour Road close to Tesco, Seaton Tramway and the Jurassic Coast interpretation centre due to open by Easter.

The remaining development large tourism development site in Seaton is at Seaton Heights on the A3052, which has had planning permission for many years but has had numerous setbacks.

Seaton Heights: facilities complete by “June 2016” says website!

Isn’t it about time the people who own Seaton Heights put out another reason? excuse? waffle? about why it is still sitting derelict after all these years and all their promises?

The once rather posh website has gone distinctly plain these days:

http://lymebayleisure.co.uk/seaton-heights/

and yet they are still offering to reserve off-plan properties for £1,000 and give a completion date of June 2016 for facilities. Here is what they say on the website today

“The resort is only a two and half [sic] drive from central London and is serviced by mainline trains from either Paddington or Waterloo stations. Located at the entrance to Seaton and overlooking Seaton Bay and the mouth of the River Axe all of the properties being released in the first phase can be assured of wonderful sea views.

Once complete the Deck Houses will be supported by “The Gatehouse” a luxury four star leisure facility (opening in June 2016) consisting of a gymnasium and swimming pool with glass fronted views over the bay. A luxury spa with five treatment rooms, sauna, steam and herbal suits with a therapeutic thermal pool for the ultimate indulgence. The ground floor has a reception, coffee shop and sea facing restaurant providing a wonderful dining experience 7 days a week.

The first phase of Deck House are a mix of two and three bedroom properties ranging from 93 to 122 square meters all with either integral balconies or roof top terraces to enjoy the wonderful views across the bay. The properties are finished [but not yet started] to a high specification with all bedrooms having en-suite facilities and underfloor heating. The kitchen is finished with top of the range Miele appliances and all homes are air-conditioned have solid wood floors and the benefit of their own designated parking space.

Discerning purchases [sic] can secure a plot of their choice now for an initial reservation fee of just £1,000, for further details of available plots, terms and conditions and time frames please email our dedicated sales team at info@lymebayleisure.co.uk. …”

http://lymebayleisure.co.uk/luxury-properties/

They had better get a move on to finish by June!
(and you try being “easily accessible” from Paddington!)

Seaton town council by-election candidate profile

Owl has received the following from one of the candidates for the Seaton Town Council by-election to be held on:

Thursday 11 February 2016

Any and all other candidates may send a similar profile for publication:

My name is Jack Rowland and I am standing for election as a vacancy has arisen.

I hope you will take a few minutes to read this to find out more about me and the reasons why I want to be a Councillor.

I moved to Seaton in 2003 and had spent my working career in the life insurance industry, initially as an underwriter and then in senior managerial positions for various companies in London, Stevenage, Woking and Sheffield. After moving to Seaton and then retiring I have been able to carry out voluntary driving to take people to medical appointments and also become a police volunteer for the local community speedwatch team.

I fully support the decision made to transfer the freehold of Seaton Town Hall from East Devon District Council to Seaton Town Council at no cost. This will enable the Town Council to offer a long term lease to Seaton Voice and allow them to continue the splendid work that has made The Gateway a central part of our community and raise funds to improve the venue. Seaton Museum will also be able to continue at the present site. Seaton Town Council will then be able to relocate to Marshlands and allow that current unused site to also be used for the benefit of the community.

Last November I wrote to all Councillors urging them to attend the public meeting arranged by Seaton Voice in an attempt to heal the rift that had occurred at that time between Seaton Voice and Seaton Town Council and even offered to act as a mediator as a concerned Seaton resident.

For over a year now I have been attending all the full council meetings of Seaton Town Council and asking relevant questions where appropriate and lobbying for support from our Councillors for action from the County Council to improve road safety on Seaton Down Hill regarding the speed limits
I still like to keep fit by running (some would say shambling) and playing walking football. Some of you may also recognise me from delivering over 300 copies of the Midweek Herald which is another way of me trying to retain some fitness.”

Sidmouth beach management steering group – update

EDDC Press Release about last Friday’s Sidmouth Beach management Steering Group:
http://eastdevon.gov.uk/news/2016/01/bmp-steering-group-discuss-long-list-options/

For feedback to the members of the Vision Group for Sidmouth ( a more detailed explanation) see:
https://www.visionforsidmouth.org/news/2016/january/sidmouth-beach-management-plan-considering-the-consultants-proposals-full-report.aspx

Hard luck if you want to enter or leave Sidmouth and Seaton car parks more than once after 9 pm

Whilst it is commendable that EDDC should wish to discourage boy racers in two car parks, one each in Sidmouth and Seaton or does beg the question – how do you get your car into or out of said car parks when the barriers are down between 9 pm and 8 am? Or are all Sidmothians and Seatonians safely in their beds by 9 pm and never going to work before 8 am? And what of those who have annual permits – will they get a discount because these car parks are no longer available for multiple use for half the day? “Dragon’s teeth” may well let you only in or only out but surely there must be times when they will not be appropriate for the ordinary car user who may, for all sorts of reasons need multiple exits and entry at times? And surely overtime is going to need to be paid to those who do the locking/unlocking? Hmmm.

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/news/2015/11/boy-racers-to-be-deterred-from-using-seaton-and-sidmouth-public-car-parks/

Gypsies- not in my back yard says Swire – stick ’em in Neil Parish’s bit of East Devon!

“East Devon MP Hugo Swire has urged a rethink on council plans to locate a large gypsy and traveller site in Cranbrook.

East Devon District Council, which is obliged to provide 37 new gypsy and traveller pitches in East Devon between now and 2034, is proposing in the latest draft of the local plan to create 30 new pitches in Cranbrook – 81per cent of the council’s overall allocation.

Cranbrook Town Council have opposed the plans.

Mr Swire said: “Obviously the easy thing to do is to put the majority of pitches in the same place but that does not mean it is the right thing to do.

There is more to East Devon than Cranbrook and I believe that other areas such as Axminster and Seaton should all take their fair share.

‘This looks to me like a rushed solution as the lack of identified sites is holding up the Local Plan. The majority of my constituents in Cranbrook have no objection in principle to taking on their share of pitches but it is clearly unfair for the town to have to accommodate over 80% of EDDC’s entire allocation.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/East-Devon-MP-urges-rethink-Cranbrook-gypsy/story-28231277-detail/story.html

No matter that EDDC itself has said that gypsy and traveller sites should be on arterial road routes.

One can only imagine what our two MPs have to say to each other – if, indeed, they speak at all.

Wonder what EDDC councillors in Axminster and Seaton think?

High Court action to protect wetlands – including River Axe

“Conservationists and angling organisations are taking the Government to the High Court over the protection of precious rivers and wetlands, including in the Westcountry.

The World Wildlife Fund, the Angling Trust and Fish Legal have accused the Environment Department, Defra, and the Environment Agency of “dragging its feet”.

They say that despite legally committing to ensure 44 sites across the country were healthy this year ministers have stifled action to address harmful pollution from farms.

The groups are seeking a judicial review in a bid to protect the rivers, lakes and coastal areas from further damage.

Among the list are special areas of conservation, including Plymouth Sound Estuaries, the River Axe and the River Camel.”

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/High-Court-battle-prevent-damage-wetlands/story-28207347-detail/story.html

Seaton to lose its Voice?

Yet another example of East Devon District Council cherry-picking which assets it sells and which it keeps.

You might think it was simple: sell those that don’t make money and keep those that do. But it isn’t that simple when it comes to the arts and the community. Money was poured into the Honiton Beehive complex (£300,000 plus and maybe much more gifted, not loaned), the Thelma Hulbert Gallery, also in Honiton, has never made money but we are not allowed to know exactly how much it loses and the Manor Pavilion (Sidmouth) is similarly a financial mystery. EDDC hived off its leisure facilities to Leisure East Devon years ago but we are never too sure how much that company still receives in subsidy – information is scant.

But not so Seaton Town Hall – the town’s only arts and entertainment venue run by local social enterprise company Seaton’s Voice and called The Seaton Gateway. [A social enterprise company is not a not-for-profit company, it is simply a normal company that has a social mission as part of its Memorandum of Association according to government information]

Currently, the Gateway occupies the large ground floor which includes a large hall and bar facilities, the town council has the much smaller first floor and the museum the even smaller top floor. The upper floors are not accessible to disabled people having many stairs for access. The Gateway has three directors who run the venue with a large number of volunteer staff.

For some years, it appears that EDDC was prepared to subsidise The Gateway – which has made a name for itself with regular musical entertainment, live theatre broadcasts and rooms rented out to local groups and societies – EDDC has just written off a £30,000 loan it gave to Seaton’s Voice and was also paying 20% of the building’s utility bills.

Now all has changed. EDDC wants to divest itself of Seaton Town Hall and will only entertain transferring it to the town council and not to Seaton’s Voice.

However, in a twist of fate, at the same time, Devon County Council was keen to get rid of its own building in Seaton – the former Marshlands Centre which has been closed for some time – and for a knock-down price and the town council decided to buy it from them, using its reserves for the purchase, fearing that such an opportunity might not happen again.

This has put Seaton Town Council on the horns of a dilemma: move into its own almost purpose-built accommodation which it would own and run for itself or share an old building where the vast majority of the space is taken up by a private tenant which has been used to being subsidised or keep both buildings and all the financial pressures and problems of owning them both. But at the moment the Council IS saying both rather than one or the other.

It has been revealed that to make the building fit-for-purpose, the town council would need to take out a Public Works Loan of £400,000 plus and The Gateway company would need to fundraise around £200,000 – massive amounts for a small town council and for a small company.

If it keeps the town hall and raises the money, the town council will have a tenant which needs most of the useable and income-producing space but which operates with a shoestring staff of volunteers and which has not been used to operating at full cost and which will presumably also expect some sort subsidy from the town council.

In yet another twist of fate, the company running The Gateway has now said in the pages of the local press that it will not co-operate with the town council on a plan for the town hall now that it is purchasing Marshlands, because the council discussed the purchase behind closed doors without including them, and fearing, presumably and probably correctly, that the town council’s priorities cannot be its priorities.

It seems now that either the town council will decide it does not want the town hall at all or it will take on two buildings with the result that they will of necessity have much less to spend on the Town Hall than if it had been the only building it owned. But at the moment the Council IS saying both rather than one or the other.

So, we have SOME arts and community venues being subsidised by EDDC, and one it doesn’t want to subsidise and wants to slough off onto a small town council which would have to raise its precept in order to subsidise a private business to provide arts and community services.

Well done, EDDC. Still, at least councillors in the new HQ in Honiton will be able to pop to the Beehive and the Thelma Hulbert Gallery in their free time.

East Devon coastal sprawl could cost you a 27% drop in your house price if World Heritage status risked

” … the Jurassic Coast World Heritage Site is formed from a massive slice of East Devon and Dorset.

This includes towns already well known to attract premium price tags such as Beer, Lyme Regis, Seaton and Sidmouth and Budleigh Salterton, which earlier this year was named among the most expensive places to buy in the Westcountry with average prices of £342,442.

According to Zoopla, while the average residential property is valued at £284,000, those near a site that holds Unesco status are valued at £362,000 – a difference of 27%.”

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/World-heritage-status-means-West-homes-attract-78/story-28184478-detail/story.html

Seaton Heights: one year on from “ready to go” – no progress

Last October:

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2014/10/22/seaton-heights-hotel-complex-is-it-ready-to-start-building/comment-page-1/

Progress? None.

Yet, according to this web page (which we have saved in case it changes):

http://lymebayleisure.co.uk/luxury-properties/

“Discerning purchases (sic) can secure a plot of their choice now for an initial reservation fee of just £1,000, for further details of available plots, terms and conditions and time frames please email our dedicated sales team at info@lymebayleisure.co.uk”

Time for another update, perhaps?

Seaton/Colyford Green wedge planning application – information for objectors

Planning Application 15/2188/MOUT

Objections need to be in to EDDC Planning by 27th October 2015. This is the date which you should look to if you want your email or letter displayed on the EDDC website and to be considered by the Development Management Committee.

The planning application will probably be discussed by the Development Management Committee on 8 December  2015 at The Knowle, Seaton.

Unfortunately the EDDC New Local Plan will not be approved by the inspector until early 2016 – one possible reason why this planning application has been made at this time.

Below is a link to points that you may wish to consider when making your objection:

GreenWedge-notes for objectors 20.10.15 (1)

EDDC planners confirmed holiday accommodation at Queens Drive two years ago

Agenda Item 3 SW Region Planning Officers meeting, Cranbrook:

“Exmouth and Seaton Regeneration:

Presentation by Alison Hayward, Principal Regeneration Project Manager at East Devon District Council – Appendix 2
Exmouth noted signs of economic decline in earl y 2000’s.
Council – enabling role and significant landowner.

Masterplan adopted 2011 and delivery strategy. Public realm improvements £1m. Elizabeth Hall community venue to redevelop as Premier Inn. Indoor bowling alley, soft play, venue (all from private investment). Station area – aim to improve connectivity, discussions with stagecoach (depot). Rugby club to be relocated to enable supermarket development. Watersports facilities at Queens Drive – looking to relocate road for better linkage with sea – inc hotel / holiday accommodation. Outline planning application prior to selling some of the site to developer partner / operator. Mamhead slipway (deepwater) collapsed – engineering solutions to replace/enhance, up to £1.3m council costs. Town centre area also being examined – land ownership issues complex.

Seaton – special policy (regeneration) in 2006 local plan. Capital receipt of EDDC land sale (Tesco + 400 homes) reinvested. Coastal communities and HLF funding bids for fossil centre. Wetlands reserve (Devon Wildlife Trust). Other projects: Seaton Quay, workshops, tramway improvements.

Q&A – Tesco does not appear to have impacted on town centre. Ex estuary mitigation strategy for Premier Inn south.”

Planning Officers SW meeting October 2013

Click to access SW%20Region%20Notes%20181013.pdf

Seaton: Town Council changes Green Wedge planning meeting venue

The Seaton Town Council Planning meeting which will consider the Green Wedge application will now be in the United Reform Church, Cross Street, at 7 on Monday 19th October, as the council anticipates a large public turnout.”

seatonmatters.org

Seaton Heights – further delay

Anyone else not entirely convinced by the information from the latest set of owners of this site as reported in this week’s View from Seaton?

“Lyme Bay Leisure stresses that the Seaton Heights holiday and leisure project is moving forward despite a delay in getting on site.

It was in early June that company bosses said they hoped to start work on site in September, which didn’t happen.
A number of concerned residents have contacted Pulman’s View, asking if the project is going ahead.

One resident, Roy Newman, said: “The most recent news was that in September, after many setbacks, work would commence. Now we are one day away from October with no news being imminent.”

Lyme Bay Leisure Ltd MD James Hetherington responded by telling Pulman’s View: “We are continuing to make progress towards developing the site at Seaton. There have been delays in planning and ecology, in particular protecting the bat flightpath.

“The matter has been further delayed by the difficulty and complexity of funding the site as a majority of funders are very reluctant to even part-fund projects with a significant leisure element.

“Lyme Bay Leisure have always recognised the need and importance of the leisure facilities to the local people and have as such decided to take the necessary time required to put in place a facility that will deliver the leisure facilities to the residents of Seaton and the surrounding area at the same time as the properties come to market.
“The delays so far have caused Lyme Bay Leisure to delay a start on site this summer, but they are still hoping to make a start this year, ideally before Christmas, by addressing ecology matters and addressing the pre-conditions set by East Devon District Council before getting in to full scale development early next year.”

The complex will comprise a two-storey 12-bedroom hotel, 38 holiday accommodation units, a central amenities building to house a restaurant and leisure club, plus parking and access.

It is to be called The Seaton Gatehouse Hotel, Spa and Leisure Resort.

Mr Hetherington added: “Individuals who would like more information about the project including the revised layout of the leisure facilities or who would like to show their support for the project are encouraged to contact Lyme Bay Leisure direct by emailing info@lymebayleisure. co.uk where they can receive a regular monthly update.”

Perhaps Seatonians might wish to take up this offer, though they might possibly wait to show support until things are much clearer.

Promises, promises, promises … warnings, warnings, warnings …

Owl was much engaged with the Guardian article in 2010 on Seaton’s regeneration referred to below. And many, many thanks to Councillor Twiss for ensuring that we revisited this important topic and took stock of the last five years.

For example, a day before the General Election in that year, a Tory spokesperson said:

“The Conservatives have voiced unease about Tesco Towns. Bob Neill, shadow minister for local government and planning, says: “I am concerned that the rise of so-called supermarket towns will lead to developments where small retailers have no place or face uncompetitive rents. Planning rules must be amended to allow councils to take into account the benefits of greater competition and the need to protect small business.”

The party has pledged to introduce greater local participation in planning through its “open source” proposals if it wins tomorrow’s general election.”

and

“A spokesman for the company says Tesco has been providing much-needed mixed use development since 1997 in deprived areas. “These are urban areas which have not received investment for a number of years. We are willing to invest, and that kind of investment has to be applauded and welcomed. We’re looking at providing more than 2,000 jobs in these areas that can benefit the community for years to come. He adds: “Councils are very welcoming because we are bringing in jobs and investment.”

Anyone seen many of those 2,000 jobs anywhere! Excluding zero hours, of course.

A correspondent writes on “regeneration” East Devon style

This is a comment to the previous post which we have published as a post, from Sandra Semple, Mayor of Seaton during the major part of its regeneration process:

“Can we knock several of Councillor Twiss’s naive misconceptions about Seaton “regeneration” on the head. I know, I was there as Mayor at the time.

First, we got nothing but a massive Tesco and a housing estate with no affordable housing. No hotel, no leisure facilities, no community facilities. The town’s yourh club, day nursery, swimming pool and gym were demolished along with a thriving 500 bed holiday camp. The nursery was re-located (with a Devon County Council grant) on land meant to be for a re-located youth centre – which could not be built anyway as it was during the recession, the land was not adequate after the nursery was completed, grants were hard to come by and we were given only a paltry £80,000 towards a new facility (Colyton’s Reece Strawbridge Centre built at that time cost £500,000).

Ah, people will say, you got a wonderful new Visitor Centre (due to open next year, 6 years after the Tesco). Wrong: EDDC was paid £2 million by Tesco for a right of way across land OUTSIDE the regeneration area (where the youth club stood) as otherwise they would have been classed as an out-of-town store. This would have given the edge to Sainsburys which was what the town wanted, smaller, closer and would have included a completed Visitor Centre on the first floor (fully accessible to disabled people and overlooking the Wetlands) on the day the store opened.

The current Visitor Centre could not have been built without a hefty injection of lottery funding and an agreement that it would be run by Devon Wildlife Trust. The centre had been meant to include a terminus for the Minehead-Seaton national cycle route (lockers, showers etc) but these were cut out due to the extra cost involved. As to whether it will (continually, not just in its first year) attract 50,000 visitors remains to be seen, especially now Lyme Regis is extending its town museum and there is talk of a Jurrasic Eden-Centre type project on Portland.

We lost half our main car park to the Visitor Centre (an overflow carpark has been built on former public open space) and without the 500 beds at the holiday camp (85% occupied 50 weeks a year) we lost the main accommodation base for the annual Grizzly Run. Our biggest hotel is 10 beds and tourists visiting the Wetlands are unlikely to find accommodation in Seaton easily. But never mind, they can go to Premier Inns in Honiton and Exmouth.

Each and every desire of the local population – most of which could have been achieved – was ignored or ignominiously dismissed. If it did not come from Tesco or a small coterie of officers and councillors – forget it. Though mostly from Tesco. Even our “Regeneration Board” was a fantasy (a Twiss word) as it was just a talking shop which rubber stamped decisions already made. I was asked to leave it because I criticised Tesco (privately) and I did leave because it was achieving precisely nothing.

Regeneration? In your dreams. As I said in a national newspaper article at the time: “My town was sold to Tesco”:

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2010/may/05/urban-development-tesco-towns

and I see no reason to change my mind almost exactly five years since Tesco opened.”

Councillor Twiss gets his knickers in a twiss yet again – and it’s personal – yet again

The most extraordinary rant has appeared in the Sidmouth Herald under the authorship of (“I am not and never have been the Whip for the East Devon Conservative Party”) Councillor Phil Twiss, which is reproduced in its entirety below (with comments added).  It puts us in mind of the early days of the sterling work of Councillor Claire Wright, when she was also attacked for attempting to change the much-derided status quo.

I have  quoted the full press release provided by a local newspaper, not the shorter version in the Sidmouth Herald

WE WANT SIDMOUTH TO MOVE FORWARD, NOT BE HELD BACK (HELD BACK FROM WHAT?)

The Conservative Group on East Devon District Council (EDDC) have hit back at comments made by an East Devon Alliance councillor for her naïve and misleading rant in last week’s Sidmouth Herald.  (So, here follows a naive and misleading rant from Councillor Twiss)

In the report, EDA Councillor Cathy Gardner, who represents Sidmouth Town Ward, claimed that a proposal to build social housing on the site of a car park in Mill Street was part of a wider plan for Eastern Town and spoke of the town being at risk of ‘fighting a battle but losing a war’.

Cllr Gardner is guilty of muddled thinking and of embarking on a naïve and misleading rant aimed at making political capital out of the vital issue of providing homes for Sidmouth’s young families.  (You be the judge of who is out to make political capital here)

A consultation proposed by the EDA councillor would muddy the waters if and when the district council came to conduct its own public survey – which would take place as part of the normal democratic process.  (So, what we always knew – early consultations muddy the waters and council surveys late in the day are the way forward)

ROUTINE

No firm plans had yet been drawn up for Mill Street and if and when such proposals were formed, a public consultation would follow as a matter of routine.  (How much more firm could you be when you hike car park prices 300%, reduce ability to rent spaces and then put out a hasty press release saying you intend to turn it into social housing?)

It’s all very well for ward representatives to genuinely stand up for what they see as the rights of their constituents. It’s quite another to say things that will mislead people into forming the wrong conclusions, especially when this is based on a poor understanding of how the planning process works.  (Still not sure what the “wrong conclusions” are here)

There is a lot of incorrect information in Councillor Gardner’s reported remarks and this displays either a naïve ignorance of the facts or a desire to stir up a political storm in a teacup – or both.  (Not that he does not specifically say at any point what this incorrect information might be)

Councillor Gardner appears to be linking a possible plan for affordable homes in Mill Street with a wider redevelopment scheme for Eastern Town and even the project to create a Beach Management Plan for Sidmouth. Her suggestion that the Beach Management Plan lacked progress is mischievous and untrue.  (But surely the proper thing to do in this situation IS to link plans for Mill Street to wider Port Royal and beach management?  This is the joined-up thinking that Councillor Twiss and his colleagues say needs to be done)

Derogatory comments about EDDC’s ongoing and successful regeneration projects in Seaton and Exmouth take conspiracy theories to a whole new level of fantasy.  (Oh wow – ask the residents of Exmouth and Seaton what they think of their so-called regeneration plans, Councillor Twiss.  A big Tesco and non-affordable housing for Seaton.  Exmouth – where a protest group is going from strength to strength as initial plans turn into luxury flats)

Building homes on the Mill Street site, if this did go ahead, would be part of the district council’s ongoing commitment to providing jobs and affordable housing for Sidmouth’s upcoming generation of school-leavers and young families and was entirely in line with the Government’s wish to see an end to a nationwide housing drought.  (Er, no it isn’t – the Government just announced that it is dropping affordable housing from the requirements for developers – and as affordable rent is still considered 80% of the cost of non-affordable housing still well out of reach of Sidmouth’s young people).

 MOVE FORWARD (er, not sure about that)

The Conservatives on EDDC want to see the district and its communities move forward, not stay stuck in the present or the past. They are following very carefully developed regeneration strategies in Seaton and Exmouth and these are based on years of careful study and prior consultation with the community.  (See above – when consulted, both towns rejected EDDC’s plans – which went ahead anyway)

Ask fair-minded councillors in Seaton and Exmouth whether regeneration projects in their towns have been beneficial and you might get a different view from the jaundiced judgement of Ms Gardner.  (Ah, fair-minded councillors – these seem to be anyone who agrees with Councillor Twiss!)

Sidmouth must not be left behind. We want to see a number of improvements to help the town move forward and we will resist any attempt by people like Ms Gardner to hold Sidmouth back.  (Did you notice here that none of the so-called improvements are named?  That’s because there aren’t any apparently!)

Any assumption by recently elected councillors that nothing happened before they arrived on the scene is both naïve and arrogant.  A lot of good things are happening. These new councillors should make the effort to find out how hard members and officers have worked in the past and resist the temptation to be new brooms sweeping away good ideas just for the sake of scoring cheap political points.  (Oh, Councillor Twiss – it is precisely because such a lot DID happen before they were elected that they got elected in the first place.  Just why should new councillors be tied to the past and why should they not be new brooms – and just who is trying to score cheap political points here?)

Well done, Councillor Gardner – you must be doing something right if you have brought out the attack dogs so early in your councillorship!  Keep up the good work for the citizens of Sidmouth!  They needed someone like you and the district needs someone like you to hold power to account.