“English Heritage” splits in two today

One section to conserve buildings, one to give “planning advice”.

“The government has confirmed that its heritage advisor, English Heritage, will be split into two separate organisations, with a new body, Historic England, taking on planning and heritage protection responsibilities.”

Oh dear – anyone else fear for our historic buildings?

http://www.planningresource.co.uk/article/1317154/new-body-english-heritage-planning-responsibilities

Force young people to vote – even for “none of the above”

But why just 18 year olds (the article says to get them into the habit of voting) and what if ” none of the above” is the majority choice!

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Young-people-forced-vote/story-26287132-detail/story.html

Exeter homes are unaffordable – so where do housebuyers go?

The article cited below blames not only high house prices but also the fact that many sites in the city boundary are now snapped up for student housing (which is not counted in Local Plans). With more than 18,000 students that means that Exeter is bursting at the seams and when a site (green or brown) becomes available in the city, the University snaps it up, leading to the “town v gown” mentality common in most big university cities.

The number of student dwellings in the city rose from 1,495 in October 2009 to 2,975 in October 2014 – an increase of 98.99 per cent.
says the article.

Towns such as Cranbrook and Newton Abbott are therefore becoming dormitories and commuter belts for what EDDC is already calling “Greater Exeter” – meaning many people must take to their cars in East Devon to get to their jobs in Exeter and those same people use their cars to get to entertainment and leisure facilities in the city. Bus travel is being cut not expanded, so no help there.

With EDDC’s choice of high economic growth for our Local Plan this basically means we now have to dance to Exeter’s tune – the more jobs Exeter creates, the more houses we have to build. The more sites the University buys in the city, the more workers must find alternatives elsewhere.

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Exeter-affordable-cities-home-buyers/story-26286503-detail/story.html

Happy East Devon Easter!

Shaping East Devon’s future……Keith Owen’s inspirational legacy (thanks to the Sid Vale Association’s work!) is bringing much more than just spectacular swathes of Spring flowers. It’s hit the national headlines….and the tourism trigger!
And community spirit has been raised to a new high: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11514052/Millionaires-valley-of-a-million-bulbs-dying-dream-fulfilled.html

MP voting records

Is your MP a Tory or Lib Dem? Want to know what they’ve been doing in your name for the last five years?

See if they have a parliamentary record worth defending — or one they’d rather you didn’t know…

http://www.labour.org.uk/w/tory-libdem-voting-record?source=2015_03_26_MP_voting_record&subsource=labour_twitter&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=labourUK&utm_campaign=2015_03_26_MP_voting_record

This is what happened when Hugo Swire’s name was input:

voting

Pizza: the Tories’ secret weapon

For Hugo Swire:

http://www.hugoswire.org.uk/news/local-mp-gets-behind-sainsburys-food-counter

and

George Osborne:

http://www.itv.com/news/meridian/update/2015-03-31/george-osborne-gets-a-pizza-the-action-in-hove/

AND David Cameron, George Osborne AND Boris Johnson – though this time it is the upmarket Swiss resort of Davos where all the rich people meet once a year:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/meanwhile-in-davoshow-the-pm-george-and-boris-digested-the–gdp-slump-8467629.html

Hugo Swire doesn’t think youthful politicians are a good idea

Question: If you could change one thing about British Politics what would it be?

Hugo Swire’s answer: Make sure that our ageing population also had representatives of their own age and reverse this constant demand for elected politicians to be youthful

http://www.eastdevonconservatives.org/news/spotlight-rt-hon-hugo-swire-mp

Now, who might he be thinking of!

An Easter treat … not to be taken seriously, of course

From a correspondent:

Oxford University researchers have discovered the heaviest element yet known to science. The new element, Governmentium (symbol=Gv), has one neutron, 25 assistant neutrons, 88 deputy neutrons and 198 assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 312.

These 312 particles are held together by forces called morons, which are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called pillocks. Since Governmentium has no electrons, it is inert. However, it can be detected, because it impedes every reaction with which it comes into contact.

A tiny amount of Governmentium can cause a reaction that would normally take less than a second, to take from 4 days to 4 years to complete Governmentium has a normal half-life of 2 to 6 years. It does not decay, but instead undergoes a reorganisation in which a portion of the assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange places.

In fact, Governmentium’s mass will actually increase over time, since each reorganisation will cause more morons to become neutrons, forming isodopes.
This characteristic of moron promotion leads some scientists to believe that Governmentium is formed whenever morons reach a critical concentration. This hypothetical quantity is referred to as a critical morass. When catalysed with money, Governmentium becomes Administratium (symbol=Ad), an element that radiates just as much energy as Governmentium, since it has half as many pillocks but twice as many morons.

Scrutiny: one to file away for the next council

Which, with any luck, will have many more Independent councillors prepared to scrutinise decisions of the council demicratically and transparently:

“12. Petitions asking for officers to give evidence

If your petition contains more than 750 signatures your petition may ask for a senior council officer to give evidence at a public meeting about something for which the officer is responsible as part of their job.

Your petition may ask the officer to explain progress on a particular issue or to explain the advice given to the Leader and/or councillors to enable them to make a particular decision. The petition must relate to the officer’s job and cannot relate to their personal circumstances or character.

The evidence will be given at a public meeting of the council’s Overview and Scrutiny Committee and not at a meeting of the Council. The officer giving evidence at the meeting may be accompanied by another officer, technical expert or a representative from a partner agency. You will be given details of the meeting so that you can attend. The Committee meetings are normally held in public, but the Committee has the option to exclude the press and public from any part of the meeting that discusses confidential information. If the Committee does exclude the press and public you will also have to leave the meeting. If possible you will be given the opportunity to present your petition first. If it is likely that the press and public will be excluded from the whole or any part of the meeting you will be notified of this and given the reason(s) for this when we give you the details of the meeting. You should be aware that the committee may decide that it would be more appropriate for another officer to give evidence instead of any officer named in the petition – for instance if the named officer has changed jobs. The committee may also decide to call the Leader or relevant councillor to attend the meeting. Only the Committee will ask questions at this meeting, but you will be able to suggest questions you would like them to ask by contacting the Democratic Services Manager (by telephone 01395 517541 or Team number 01395 516546 or e-mailing dvernon@eastdevon.gov.uk) by 4.00 pm three working days before the meeting.”

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/committees-and-meetings/petitions/petitions-asking-for-officers-to-give-evidence/

From the archives: the siege of Newton Poppleford

Wherin EDDC had to be threatened with a judicial review before they would admit to “errors”

https://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/s=newton+poppleford&submit=Search

and Freedom of Speech meant freedom to attempt to gag a councillor:

https://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2013/06/25/another-month-another-chaotic-planning-meeting-at-newton-poppleford/

and here:

https://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/?s=Graham+Salter&submit=Search

No action was taken against Councillor Salter as all complaints were found to be groundless and unactionable in law.

“A view from a disenfranchised youth”

When this magazine’s editor wrote a TV review about politics, Ella Marshall wrote a letter to protest its tone: “Next time you want to publish an article with consideration towards young people, I suggest you let one of us write it”. So we did. Here’s what Ella, 16 – and a Youth MP– had to say on behalf of those too young to vote

* Give us our vote. Lower the voting age to 16 and re-engage young people with the governance of our country. Sixteen is the age at which we may pay tax, are able to have sex and sign up to the military and yet we’re not mature enough for the basic human right to contribute to democracy? Don’t be afraid of amplifying our youthful, and possibly more alternative, political opinions.

* Education shouldn’t be used as a political football. If you do reform schools further, it must be a method by which you can help us grow into rounded human beings, rather than a labour force worn down by our own target grades before the age of 16. We need a curriculum for life. This means professionals visiting schools who are able to teach us about both the physical and emotional aspects of sex. And please stop putting merciless amounts of pressure on our hard-working and dedicated teachers.g

* Hands off the NHS. Government officials who are rich enough to afford private healthcare have been progressively selling off sections of our most essential public service for the past five years. There is no way that moving towards a more privatised system will benefit anybody, other than the privatisers.

* We want less “long-term economic plan” and more “ordinary lives matter”. Every 11 minutes, a family in Britain find themselves homeless and yet, according to the Office for National Statistics, there are over a million empty homes in England and Wales. The richest 1 per cent of people have the same wealth as 55 per cent of the population. We, as young people, are taught about the importance of paying tax and contributing to society and yet there seems to be a different standard for the financial elite.

From the same article below:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/caroline-lucas-reveals-10-things-no-one-tells-you-before-you-first-enter-parliament-10149138.html

Whips: what they don’t tell you in Parliament by Caroline Lucas

From

“Caroline Lucas reveals 10 things no one tells you before you first enter Parliament”

Whips are all-powerful

Another shock was to see how the powers of parliamentary scrutiny are so poorly exercised. Membership of the ad hoc ‘bill committees’ set up to go through draft legislation line by line is one of the best opportunities to have direct influence over future laws. That’s why the whips generally try to keep people with too much expertise or independence of mind off these committees. Sarah Wollaston, the Conservative MP for Totnes and a former GP, tells of her enthusiasm to sit on the Health and Social Care bill committee. Instead, the whips told her to sit on a committee examining double taxation in the Cayman Islands. When she protested that she knew nothing of the subject, the whips replied that was all to the good: all they wanted her to do was to vote the right way at the right time.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/caroline-lucas-reveals-10-things-no-one-tells-you-before-you-first-enter-parliament-10149138.html

EDDC’s letters to Planning Inspector on latest draft local plan

18 March 2015

Click to access 07-letter-to-mr-thickett-18-march-2015.pdf

30 March 2015:

Click to access 08-letter-to-mr-thickett-30-march-2015.pdf

and

Click to access cil-letter-31-03-15.pdf

Mr Thickett, the Inspector, is usually quick to respond so we should see replies to all three of these soon (or, indeed, he may have already replied but letters may be awaiting posting on EDDC’s webpage of correspondence with the Inspector:

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy/emerging-plans-and-policies/inspector-and-programme-officer/correspondence-between-the-inspector-and-council-after-the-examination-hearings/

Well, he would wouldn’t he!

Election candidate Neil Parish supports bid to make Devon more dementia friendly

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Election-candidate-Neil-Parish-supports-bid-make/story-26278235-detail/story.html

Yes very nice, but would any prospective MP NOT do this?

Cost to him: nothing
Cost to government: nothing

Let’s see more on what he personally will do in government on the NHS, family carers and local government adult care services for people with, or caring for, those with dementia.

Reduced benefits, reduced respite care and stretched and cut-to-the-bone adult services throw these costs on to families and force charities to step in to fill the funding gaps.

Intermittent giving to charity is no substitute for guaranteed funding.

Sidmouth: meet your candidates

From the East Devon Alliance website:

eastdevonalliance.org.uk

(where – as soon as nominations have closed in 9 April – you will find details of all candidates standing under the East Devon Alliance umbrella)

This month the Vision Group for Sidmouth (VGS) is running three “Meet the Candidates” events in the run up to the elections on May 7th.

Dates for your diaries are:

EDDC – Wednesday 15th April

Town Council – Tuesday 21st April
East Devon Parliamentary – Tuesday 28th April.

For the EDDC and Parliamentary elections you will need to forward your questions to

info@visionforsidmouth.org

before the event. More details on the Vision Group for Sidmouth website.

Read more at: http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/news/20150402/vision-group-for-sidmouth-meet-the-candidates-events/

What odds now Claire Wright?

Now pulling crowds in to her events …

Started at 66/1
then 33/1
then 25/1
then 20/1
then 16/1
then 9/1
then 6/1
now 9/2 (4.5/1) at William Hill 5/1 at Ladbrokes

Those people who got their bets in early must be feeling very excited! But still a profit for anyone still keen to get involved.

You must be over 18 and please bet responsibly.

The eleventh hour: why you should vote Independent

For those who do not click on links, here is the text of Paul Arnott of the independent East Devon Alliance’s hopes for change at the crucial district elections as they appear in the current Devonshire magazine:

My first published book about fifteen years ago concerned a subject with a very boring name – adoption – with its potentially dull backdrop of social services and filing cabinets. The only way to animate it was by my personal story. I did not know until my mid-thirties that I had been illegitimately conceived in 1961 by a scared young Irish couple in London, who later went on to marry in Dublin and have four more children, my full-blood siblings. I was a devoted Englishman who it transpired had flesh and blood from County Carlow.

Now here is another boring word – planning. How to persuade a reader that at its dark heart may be the seedbed for the rebirth of our moribund national democracy? It has to be me again, for which I apologise. I was diagnosed with leukaemia four years ago, had a bone marrow transplant three years ago, am fully recovered and should be doing something quiet and nurturing with this reborn life – learning to paint, taking up the harp etc.

Instead I find myself chairman of a movement called the East Devon Alliance, which is supporting a network of Independent candidates to fight the majority of ward seats in the district election happening on the same day as those for Parliament.

It is the biggest Independent effort in British electoral history, more than 40 individual, plucky people who have decided they cannot trust our beloved environment to the whims of a one-party council dominated by pals of developers any longer. They have realised, in supposedly sleepy East Devon, that democracy can only be revived by entirely changing the guard. Indeed, perhaps in this roots-up path may be found the eventual route to national reform?

When I first fell amongst these lovely people, their horror stories from about twenty towns and villages were of a piece with my experience before being ill, making J.K Rowling’s A Casual Vacancy seem like a Year One show-and-tell project. To all of us, it was now beyond doubt that many dominant parish, town and district councillors (and sometimes clerks) mainly sought office to grease the wheels for planning consents for their allies.

Dysfunction was endemic in even the loveliest communities. Rigged agendas, bullying in meetings, and fixed minutes, were all product of the ugly elephant in too many civic rooms. In 2011, the coalition government, announced that in Planning the mantra would now be a “presumption in favour of development”.

It was game on for many well-placed councillors. The only protection against ill-conceived building in the wrong places (key agricultural land) for the wrong people (we need low-cost housing, not executive homes) was for a district to have an adopted (that boring word, again) Local Plan in place. By extraordinary chance, East Devon District Council has managed its affairs in such a way that after an unopposed four year term of office, in a relatively simple area to deal with, it has no such Local Plan at all. Naked in the conference chamber.

Instead, as in the Ireland of my genetic forebears, there is a rush for re-zoning arable for industrial estates, and a gross over-inflation of need at the upper end of the housing market. Of equal concern, there is no positive vision either. Nimbys is the stale acronym thrown at the likes of us. This is unjust.

All of us have identified adjacent to our towns and villages former factories or farmyards which are ideally located for brownfield development, many derelict for years.

Why isn’t the District Council making a united effort to build on these? Is it because this would reduce the need to build on the greenfield locations owned or agented by councillors’ pals, who have long favoured decisions to be made in skittle alleys, lodges and clubs.

We are now at the eleventh hour. I emerged from five months incarceration in a sterile, isolated hospital room to recuperate not in the pollution and tarmac of the London where I was born, but the valleys and hills of the county I love, the landscape which sustains our two essential industries of agriculture and tourism. I, and my fellow Independents, cherish and understand the meaning of stewardship – that we are but passing through. And if we can take back the reins of our afflicted district from the one-party group who now have hold, it is not too late for East Devon to become governed not as the land for robber barons but for a new era of stewards protecting democracy and environment alike.

Click to access devonshire_magazine_april-may_2015-return_of_the_good_stewards.pdf

Cranbrook to swallow Rockbeare?

See http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Villagers-concerned-250-homes-plan-connect/story-26269146-detail/story.html

Want an election visit from Hugo Swire? Put up a Claire Wright poster!

News reaches us of an Exmouth resident personally visited by Hugo Swire yesterday. Was it a coincidence that the resident had Claire Wright posters in the window?

The resident informs us that the household vote remains with Claire Wright and the posters stay up!

Information Commissioner and Woodward v East Devon District Council decision close

AFTER a seven-month wait, the outcome of a costly tribunal which examined whether East Devon District Council should publish reports regarding its controversial relocation project, is expected imminently.

So far, the council has spent £10,200 on legal costs in its appeal against the Information Commissioner’s decision that it should have disclosed certain information regarding its relocation project, as a result of a Freedom of Information request made by Sidmouth resident Jeremy Woodward.

Following the hearing at Exeter Magistrates’ Court on August 28, further written submissions were made and, at the time, a four-week wait was expected. However, the legal process instead continued for almost seven months, and due to legal sensitivities the authority has not been able to give any details as to why.

In February 2013, Mr Woodward requested all internal correspondence between council officials regarding the office relocation. This, and requested minutes from Office Relocation Working Party group meetings, were refused.

However, the commissioner ruled that reports written by an outside consultant were not covered by exemptions and should be revealed.

Deputy chief executive Richard Cohen told the First Tier Tribunal at Exeter Magistrates’ Court that the role of the author of the reports, project manager Steve Pratten, who works for Davis Langdon LLP, closely resembles that of an officer and therefore the contents of his reports should not be disclosed.

The judgement was expected last Friday, March 27, but was not forthcoming.

Criticism was heaped on the council for scheduling its full council meeting, to decide upon its office relocation, two days before the tribunal decision was due. On Wednesday, March 25, members resolved to relocate from its Sidmouth headquarters to new purpose-built offices in Honiton, and Exmouth Town Hall.

A council spokesperson, said: “The council is surprised that the target date has passed and the outcome of the tribunal’s deliberations has not yet been handed down.

“Along with all the other parties, we await the judgment and hope that the waiting will soon be over, but we are subject to the tribunal’s scheduling.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Tribunal-end-sight-East-Devon-District-Council/story-26271724-detail/story.html