Swire has the wobblies

“… Mr Swire, minister of state for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, has already raised the possibility that he might not be in the new cabinet.

Tweeting ahead of FCO departmental questions this morning, he wrote that he is “preparing for possibly my last FCO Oral Questions”. …

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/ministers-prepare-for-imminent-cabinet-reshuffle/story-29502162-detail/story.html

Oh no, if he gets sacked, instead of answering oral questions in Parliament about foreign policy he will be relegated to asking oral questions about East Devon! And mixing with the likes of Diviani, Moulding, Skinner and Hughes!

Anyone volunteering to give him a crash course on East Devon and its problems?

Still, perhaps Dave will “elevate” him to the House of Lords – we can but hope!

Publc being consulted on East Anglia devolution

Whereas, here, we are being allowed no say at all:

https://www.eastangliadevo.co.uk

“A la carte devolution” says government minister …

Anyone see a recipe for disaster in this so-called a la carte menu for devolution? Owl thinks it smacks of “make it up as you go along” and would prefer a set menu! And Owl prefers to know its destination before it starts its journeys (see last paragraph).

“Greg Clark has set out a “continuous devolution” plan to boost the role of local councils so they become equal partners with Westminster in the governance of the country.

In a speech in Manchester on Friday, the local government secretary said government was moving towards a system where local areas were able to negotiate devolution with Whitehall on a “à la carte” basis and when communities identify new opportunities.

“If you lift the lid on Whitehall, what you see is an ongoing negotiation between different departments and ministers, an open process of give-and-take, proposal and counter-proposal,” he stated.

“This is how things work within central government, and I see no reason why it shouldn’t be the same between central government and local government: each with its own role and mandate, but equal partners in the governance of the nation.”

Although the government was “not quite there yet”, the Cities and Devolution Act included three enabling mechanisms that would make this happen. …

… Clark acknowledged that “to those of an excessively tidy frame of mind, this is quite unbearable”.

He added: “It’s not that they oppose devolution, it’s just that they want it implemented in a uniform, one-speed manner from the top-down. To me, that is to miss the point completely.

“Clearly, there are common principles that must be respected – such as democratic accountability and co-operation across local boundaries – but beyond that, I believe that the flexible approach to devolution has been vindicated.”

A uniform process of devolution would lead to reform at the pace of the slowest, which would have held back cities like Manchester and Liverpool, Clark added.

“I have always been clear that each deal and each piece of decentralising legislation represents a fresh point of departure not a final destination.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/07/clark-promises-continuous-devolution-cement-central-local-partnership

West country needs a “seaside csar”

“A report, commissioned by the BHA says that people living in seaside towns are more likely to be poorly educated, unemployed, unemployable, lacking in ambition, claiming benefits and living in multiple occupation housing. …

… According to the Department for Communities and Local Government 2015 Index of Multiple Deprivation, nine out of the 10 most deprived neighbourhoods in England are seaside communities. …

… workforce.

The association, which represents more than 40,000 businesses in the sector, cites the successful regeneration of areas along the Jurassic Coast in Dorset and east Devon as examples of how the British seaside can recover.

It has produced a seven point action plan to breathe new life into seaside towns which calls on the Government to:

Appoint a seaside csar to coordinate a coherent response across all departments and spending, much like Lord Heseltine’s work in Liverpool in the 1980s.

Establish Coastal Action Groups, to develop a coordinated response and investment strategy to target the specific social and economic challenges that seaside towns face.

Create a progressive tax environment, including a reduction in Tourism VAT, to encourage coastal businesses to invest in themselves.

Create Coastal Enterprise Zones to incentivise investment and encourage businesses to move to the coast and create jobs.

Invest in critical infrastructure and improve broadband, rail and road connections, and protect against the threat of rising sea levels.

Improve education and training provision for young people and adults to ensure that they have the skills for a variety of sectors.

Support local authorities to tackle social issues and housing problems which reduce their attraction as visitor destination.

Ufi Ibrahim, chief executive of the BHA said: “The British public want to enjoy the British Seaside, and those living in coastal communities want a thriving economy.” …

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/call-for-seaside-csar-to-champion-rundown-coastal-communities/story-29498741-detail/story.html

Sidmouth residents to keep their eyes on their community hospital

“Community link to Sidmouth Victoria Hospital ‘must be maintained’

10:10 11 July 2016 Stephen Sumner
Sidmouth Victoria Hospital Ref shs 3264-50-14AW. Picture: Alex Walton.
Sidmouth Victoria Hospital Ref shs 3264-50-14AW. Picture: Alex Walton.
Sidmouth Victoria Hospital fundraisers are determined to hold NHS bosses to account as the community-funded premises are transferred to new owners – who will charge rent at the market rate.

NHS Property Services, also known as PropCo, will take on the hospital on December 1. The company does not profit and reinvests proceeds, but it will dispose of properties it judges are no longer needed.

Sidmouth Victoria Hospital has undergone a massive revamp since 1989, with much of the £4.5million bill coming from residents – and comforts fund chairman Graham Vincent is determined to ensure the community continues to have a say.

“We have two options,” he told Monday’s town council meeting. “One is what happened 60 years ago when the regional hospital board owned the buildings.”

At the time, six or seven dignitaries worked with the board to keep an eye on the buildings to see what improvements may be needed.

“They were the link between the health board and the community,” said Mr Vincent. “By doing that we hold on to a local interest.

“The other option is to form a community interest company (CIC) to lease the hospital from PropCo. It’s always been our policy to work with whoever owns the hospital.

“If we lost that local interest, we might lose out on donations. That’s no good to the local community.”

Mr Vincent said that PropCo has sold off surplus properties worth £58million and warned it cannot later be brought back under public ownership – ‘it will have gone forever’.

But he insists the hospital is well placed for the future: “Other community hospitals have lost their inpatient beds, but we’ve gained inpatient beds, and still we’ve got a minor injuries unit. We’ve got a completely new hospital, rebuilt over the last 25 years with community money. Sidmouth Hospital is stronger than any other community hospital in Devon.”

As the Herald was going to press yesterday, Mr Vincent was due to meet members of the Devon County League of Friends about the CIC.

He had a separate meeting planned with PropCo representatives.

A letter to stakeholders from NHS Property Services said charging market rents will provide the money needed for the ‘ongoing renewal’ of the estate. It also helps the NHS understand the ‘true cost’ of occupation.

It said groups like the comforts fund have raised ‘vital’ funds but the buildings are owned by the NHS and the ‘donation does not in itself provide rights of ownership’.

The transfer was triggered by the change in provider from the Northern Devon NHS Healthcare Trust to the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital’s trust, scheduled for October 1.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/community_link_to_sidmouth_victoria_hospital_must_be_maintained_1_4611342

Whither the Bullingdon Club and Hugo Swire?

Now Andrea Leadsom has withdrawn from the Tory campaign, how will East Devon MP Hugo Swire fare? Theresa May is, of course, not part of the Eton Old Boys Club and has not shown any enthusiasm for it.

Maybe we can now get our constituency MP back so he can start to deal with all the pressing problems we have here. But maybe she will enjoy keeping a few of the posh boys around in minor roles!

And what of Parish? He is a Remainer who backed Leadsom, a Brexiter!

They say a week is a long time in politics, but now it’s just a few minutes!

Brexit: a desire to return to the old certainties of Budleigh Salterton!

A european academic writes:

“Last week’s referendum, in which middle-aged and elderly British citizens with a noticeably shaky grasp of economics, international affairs and foreign languages voted in large numbers for the UK to leave the European Union, represents a Quixotic collective impulse to return to the security and timeless certainties of Budleigh Salterton.

Britain, or at least the 52 per cent of voters who endorsed the call to quit the EU, is demanding a halt to the relentless march of modernity with its multiculturalism, its immigrants from Poland, Bulgaria and Romania, its Jihadi terrorists and its Brussels-based bureaucrats and politicians who have had the temerity to legislate for Englishmen and -women.”

https://www.socialeurope.eu/2016/06/budleigh-salterton-brexit-quest-mythic-england/

Devolution – really delegation without funding

” … The promise of devolution is gaining the power to solve the problems that you are closest to by setting policy, raising resources and coordinating the state locally.

We have seen wide-ranging devolution to Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales, where the default is to take over on all matters not reserved for Whitehall. So, for example, the home secretary has no role in policing in Scotland while borders and counter terrorism are reserved; the Scottish Government sets policy, raises tax resource and coordinates the state.

This default is not a facet of English devolution. In England, Westminster, in terms of legislation, and Whitehall, in terms of management, retain everything other than matters they devolve.

This is a profound difference because, other than metro mayors and police and crime commissioners – which are clearly still in development – England does not have comparable directly elected devolved administrations that sit between central and local government to manage the whole state locally. Combined authorities do not set policy, raise tax resource or coordinate the whole local state.

Without being a pedant, technically much of what we see in England is delegation and not devolution. But it’s a start and, once this has happened, it is often difficult to roll back. Scots are not demanding that Jeremy Hunt directly controls their NHS. We will see whether Mancunians welcome a sense of more direct control of their healthcare system.

The most powerful of devolved local governments in England, the Greater London Council, was abolished and there is no reason to believe that the partial early steps of devolution in England will not be rolled back. And, if devolution does not add value, the public will probably say “a good job too”. While abolishing the GLC was controversial, it was also popular. There is a strong English tradition that the mother of all parliaments is a pretty powerful mummy where we elect MPs to run the country and tell us what to do.

But remember, this is not all about wholly homegrown dynamics. We see a global trend for economic growth that focuses on cities and city regions.

CIPFA’s annual conference this year is examining what it takes for economies to succeed.

Recently, chief inspector of schools Sir Michael Wilshaw challenged leaders in Liverpool and Manchester to demonstrate “grit, imagination, faith and bloody mindedness” when tackling failing schools. His comments show that local leaders cannot rely on holding powers but must bring about change in complex, linked networks.

For public servants, success will be in nurturing local networks to create a strong commercial and civil society that reciprocates to support social progress and financial security in the public sector. The move to 100% business rate retention for local authorities is perhaps the most telling example of how devolution will look.

Councils’ own finances will be reliant on local economic success, so they will have a greater incentive to prioritise business support.

In the devolved world, curing the sick will not simply be about providing care. It will be an ongoing process of communication and leadership to bring communities together to tackle the causes of sickness. Mixes of businesses, charities and even passionate individuals who understand local cultural and environmental factors can surpass the one-size-fits-all approaches of the past.

Finance professionals and system leaders are at the heart of this revolution. Balancing budgets will be less about moving figures around and more about driving real change to grow community success.

There is an evolution to how we work and barriers to unleashing the full force of local public service entrepreneurialism still exist but, at the present rate, we are heading for a tipping point. Yes, public services have suffered unprecedented upheaval. And yes, many challenges remain. But now is the time to focus on a positive future with renewed energy and confidence.

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/opinion/2016/07/local-enterprise-unlocking-public-sector-entrepreneurialism

EDDC accounts 2015-16 available for public inspection NOW

EAST DEVON DISTRICT COUNCIL
AUDIT OF ACCOUNTS –
PUBLIC INSPECTION ACCOUNTS AND AUDIT REGULATIONS 2015

“Notice is given that from 1 July 2016 to 11 August 2016 inclusive; between 8:30am and 5:00pm (Monday to Friday) any person interested may inspect and make copies of the accounts of East Devon District Council for the year ended 31 March 2016 and other documents referred to in Section 26(1) of the Local Audit and Accountability Act 2014.

Please address any requests for access to the Council’s unaudited accounts to: Simon Davey (Strategic Lead for Finance) at the Council address shown below or email; sdavey@eastdevon.gov.uk or telephone 01395 517490. The unaudited accounts will be available on the council’s website http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk from the 30 June 2016.

Any objections to the accounts must relate to the matter in respect of which the auditor could take action (under section 27 of the Local Audit and Accountability Act) namely, an unlawful item of account, or failure to bring the amount into account) or make a report in the public interest (under Section 24 of, and Para 1 of Schedule to, the Audit and Accountability Act 2014).

No objection may be made by or on behalf of a local government elector unless the auditor has received written notice of the proposed objection and the grounds on which it is made. In addition an elector is required at the same time to send a copy of any notice of the objection to East Devon District Council.

The addresses of the auditor and the district council are:
D Gilbert Appointed Auditor KPMG LLB
100 Temple Street Bristol
BS1 6AG

Simon Davey
Strategic Lead for Finance East Devon District Council Council Offices
Knowle
Sidmouth
Devon
EX10 8HL”

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/media/1797813/notice-of-audit-1516.pdf

“South West to showcase the UK’s £50 billion nuclear opportunity in Westminster”

Well, easy to see why so many members of our LEP who have nuclear interests are spinning this! Anyone notice any declarations of interest here? And it seems without our ever being aware of it, our biggest industry is NOT tourism it’s nuclear energy.

“50 billion worth of business opportunities are up-for-grabs for firms who can provide services for the nuclear industry in the south west. And on Monday 11th July 2016, businesses and representatives from the Government will be able to find out more about how they can play their part at a special event in Westminster.

Taking place in the House of Commons, the event: “The South West – Powering the UK’s Nuclear Future” is being hosted by Bridgwater MP Ian Liddell-Grainger, in whose constituency Hinkley Point C is situated. It features high profile speakers Tom Greatrex, former Shadow Energy Minister and now chief executive of the Nuclear Industry Association, Andrea Leadsom MP, Minister of State for Energy, and Matt Burley, chair of the Nuclear South West Industry Network Board.

The event aims to bring together parliamentarians and south west nuclear industry leaders to set out the economic potential the region has to support the UK energy sector and ensure the Government recognises the unique opportunities that exist in the south west.

Nuclear South West is capitalising on the South West’s unparalleled strength and potential in the global nuclear industry; and generating transformational economic benefits to the UK and regional business community. The facts and figures are:

There will be at least £50billion worth of contracts available to south west companies across 15 projects over the next 20 years in new build, decommissioning and defence.

There are over 180 nuclear companies and organisations in the area, with over 8,000 highly skilled workers;

70% of the UK’s low carbon electricity comes from nuclear power stations; and two new ones are being built at Hinkley Point – creating 25,000 new jobs and £100m to the local economy;

There’s a £1.8bn nuclear defence programme at Devonport in Plymouth; and 44 colleges and training providers are working with Hinkley Point Training Agency.

Matt Burley, Chair of NSW Industry Network Board said: “The future of the nuclear industry in the south west and the scale of financial opportunity that could be unlocked for businesses of different sizes and sectors is enormous.

“We’re working hard to raise awareness and understanding of this opportunity across the region. Businesses are in a fantastic position to take advantage of the national and international nuclear programmes. There are many different services required to support the industry, from equipment suppliers to waste management, and nuclear research facilities to specialist consultancies.”

Ian Liddell-Grainger MP said: “The South West is a global contender in the nuclear energy sector and it offers the potential to create tens of thousands of new jobs and generate billions of pounds for the local and national economy. MPs in our region are committed to supporting and championing the sector. It’s great to see nuclear industry businesses bringing the South West opportunity to Westminster and working with Government to help create the right conditions for growth in the sector – there’s never been a more important time to do this.”

Steve Hindley, Chair of the Heart of the South West Local Enterprise Partnership said: “The South West is the UK’s leading region in the global nuclear renaissance.

“We’re at the ready to claim first-mover advantage in the UK’s nuclear sector, due to the next generation of power stations being started right here at Hinkley Point C. It’s Europe’s largest engineering project, will generate 25,000 new jobs and £14billion investment.

“It’s not just about Hinkley though. There are 15 nuclear opportunities worth £50 billion in this area; so we’re very excited about our cross-LEP & business–led partnership under the banner of Nuclear South West. We urge our Right Honourable Members to join us in showcasing the South West’s unparalleled strength and potential for transformational growth; right here at the nucleus of the nuclear industry.”

West of England LEP chair, Stephen Robertson, said: “The south west is at the forefront of the UK nuclear industry and is leading the way with research and skills training. With over 180 nuclear companies and organisations already in the south west the potential growth and innovation in this sector is huge. Getting nuclear right in the south west will harness the supply chain potential for local companies of all sizes across the south west.”

Dr Diane Savory OBE, Chair of GFirst LEP, said: “The nuclear-based power generation industry has long been a feature of the Gloucestershire economy and we must ensure that the skills infrastructure supports the growth in the economy, by future proofing and meeting the skills needs of businesses affected by workforce displacement to the demands of the nuclear industry.

“Funds from our Growth Deal have been invested in a Gloucestershire centre of excellence in Renewable Energy, Engineering & Nuclear skills (GREEN) in anticipation of the unprecedented expansion of nuclear, low carbon energy, and engineering in Gloucestershire and the South West. The centre will open in September 2017.”

Nuclear South West (NSW) is a partnership between the nuclear industry network in the south west and the stakeholder alliance of the Local Enterprise Partnerships: Heart of the South West, West of England and GFirst; the academic and skills sector and business support agencies.”

http://www.heartofswlep.co.uk/news/south-west-showcase-uk%E2%80%99s-%C2%A350-billion-nuclear-opportunity-westminster

Does our Police and Crime Commissioner know East Devon is on her patch?

This is her official diary until the end of this year – Exeter and Tiverton seem to be the nearest she gets to us:

http://www.devonandcornwall-pcc.gov.uk/meetings-and-events/calendar/

Police and Crime Commissioners should be subject to Local Government Transparency Code

“… The NMA said it welcomed several proposals in the consultation which would strengthen local authorities’ transparency obligations such as plans to publish additional information in areas such as land and buildings, procurement and contracts, and full transparency on revenues received from all services.

It also called for Police and Crime Commissioners to be made subject to the Local Government Transparency Code and insisted that bodies such as the Fire and Rescue Authorities must not be removed from its scope.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=27665%3Amedia-call-for-leps-to-be-made-subject-to-local-government-transparency-rules&catid=59&Itemid=27<

LEPs must be subject to Freedom of Information Act says media

“Local Enterprise Partnerships must be covered by local government transparency rules and the Freedom of Information Act “to prevent billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money being hidden from public scrutiny”, media organisations have argued.

The News Media Association, which represents the industry, said LEPs were set to receive £12bn in funding between 2015-16 and 2010-21 to invest in local projects and businesses.

However, it claimed that most LEPs tended to make only headline information available, “making it difficult for journalists and members of the public to scrutinise how investment decisions are being made”.

The NMA added that an examination of the organisations’ websites had revealed that only 15 of the 39 LEPs in England and Wales published registers on board members’ interests and only seven of the LEPs’ full-year reports included clear, comprehensive statements of income and expenditure including salaries.

“There were 19 LEPs that appear to publish either no breakdown of money in or out in their annual reports or filed either dormant or highly abbreviated accounts at Companies House,” the NMA said in a submission to a government consultation on local government transparency rules.

Lucy Gill, NMA legal, policy and regulatory affairs advisor, said: “LEPs wield immense power, making investment decisions worth billions of pounds to local communities, yet journalists have enormous difficulty getting hold of even basic information about how this money is being spent.

“As the role and resources of LEPs expands, there can no longer be any justification for excluding them from local government transparency standards and the Freedom of Information Act.”

The ” clean campaign pledge” – shouldn’t ALL MPs sign it?

:: Stick to the spending limits set by the [Party] headquarters

:: Not co-operate “in any way” with other political parties, their donors, members or active supporters

:: Do “everything in our power” to ensure that supporters’ campaigning on social media is “in good taste”

:: Ensure the campaign stays within “the acceptable limits of political debate”

:: Do “what is right for our party and the country as a whole”

“We need homes for older people, not just starter homes”

Unfortunately, you can only buy new “right size” housing for older people at the top end of house price market (PegasusLife upwards of £300,000 for a one-bed flat plus maintenance service charges – no care – around £5,000 per year) if you live in East Devon, thanks to EDDC needing more and more money to pay for its new HQ – now coming in at around £10m.

…”Our report, Housing our ageing population: positive ideas – brought together for us by the Housing Learning and Improvement Network – points out that the government gets multiple benefits from enabling older people to enjoy better health and wellbeing in new homes. These include significant savings in NHS and social care spending. And those who have moved into age-exclusive, attractive new homes talk not just of the savings in outgoings – and often the release of cash to spend on other things – but the social life that banishes loneliness too.

So why is the UK so different from the US and most other European countries in terms of its housing output for those of us in our extended middle age? Why are we averse to moving until a health crisis forces us out when an earlier move could ensure our independence, in a place of our choosing, for the rest of our days? …

… As well as recommendations for housebuilders, developers and housing associations, our report urges all of us to reimagine life as we grow older, considering our future needs in a positive light. Right-sizing can help us gain the most in our later years and we need to insist – not just for ourselves but for our children and grandchildren – that barriers are lifted and opportunities enhanced for a national programme of later homes. “

https://www.theguardian.com/housing-network/2016/jun/14/later-homes-older-starter-young-uk-housebuilding

Another railway station for Cranbrook?

Just how big is Cranbrook going to be?

Just how are other towns and villages going to benefit from development in the East Devon if Cranbrook gets all the funding?

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/new-east-devon-railway-station-edges-closer/story-29491427-detail/story.html

A business too far for Axminster regeneration!

The photo graph of the scale of the factory is amazing but perhaps not quite the entrepreneurial vision Axminster is seeking!

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/axminster-road-closed-after-cannabis-factory-discovered/story-29490906-detail/story.html

Honiton hustings for district council includes East Devon Alliance candidate


“Honiton residents will have the chance to quiz candidates for a district council seat in Honiton’s St Michael’s ward.

The opportunity comes off the back of Cllr David Foster’s sudden resignation.

Three candidates – all currently serving on Honiton Town Council – are set to attend a hustings at Honiton Methodist Hall, on Friday, July 15, from 2pm.

They are

Ashley Alder (UKIP),
Henry Brown (Labour) and
John Taylor (Independent East Devon Alliance)

June Brown, chair of Honiton Senior Voice, said: “We have been approached to hold a hustings because we have a proven track record over many years and because people want more information about candidates who present themselves.

“The district council controls many services and it is only right electors get the chance to meet and question those who wish to serve them as councillors. We are very pleased that with one exception the candidates have agreed to come along.”

For more information about Senior Voice and what the organisation does, visit http://www.devonseniorvoice

http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/hustings_to_quiz_next_district_councillor_for_honiton_1_4607829

MPs election expenses – not forgotten by Democratic Audit

Probably not good news for Police and Crime Commissioner Hernandez!

With all the constitutional chaos following the EU referendum result,
it’s easy to forget that up to 30 MPs are still being investigated for
breaking election spending limits by twenty police forces across the
country. But we’re still on the case!

Last week we hosted a meeting of politicians and campaigners to talk
about two things:

How can we bring MPs who have broken the rules to justice?
How can we fix the broken election expenses system?

Our friendly legal experts had some good news – there are legal options
to pursue MPs who have broken election spending limits even if the
police aren’t already investigating them! The allegations that the
police are already investigating could just be the tip of the iceberg in
this election expenses scandal.

It shouldn’t take a crack team of investigative journalists to keep our
elections fair and protect democracy. One big obstacle in the way of
holding MPs to account is that election expenses aren’t publicly
available. The only way you can access them is by going down to your
local council offices. We are working behind the scenes to change this
in time for the next general election (whenever that may be!) We will be
talking to the Electoral Commission to put pressure on local councils to
make this vital information available online.

With Brexit and Chilcot dominating the news, the election expenses
scandal could drop off the radar. We won’t let that happen.

Best wishes,

Alexandra Runswick
Director, Unlock Democracy

Parliament starts inquiry into housebuilding capacity

“The Communities and Local Government Committee has launched an inquiry into the capacity of the housebuilding industry to meet demand for new homes.

Inquiry: Capacity in the homebuilding industry
Communities and Local Government Committee
Purpose of the inquiry
The Committee is expected to invite the chief executives of major developers to give evidence.

Other areas to be covered by the inquiry include the role of small and medium-sized developers, the skills, size and sustainability of the workforce, the planning process and development finance.

The Committee also considers innovative ways of overcoming constraints on the industry, such as self-builds, off-site construction and direct commissioning by central Government.

The Committee is likely to invite ministers and representatives of industry bodies, the Homes and Communities Agency, local authorities and housing associations to give evidence in public. Skills and training experts, members of the off-site construction and self-build sectors and debt and equity financiers are also expected to be called.

Terms of reference

The Committee invites submissions of evidence on the following issues:

whether the numbers of builders and types of firms in the homebuilding industry is sufficient to meet housing demand

the structure of the homebuilding industry, in particular the role of small and medium-sized developers

housebuilders’ business models and how risk and uncertainty affect incentives to expand

the sustainability, size and skills of the building industry workforce
why fewer homes are being started and completed than the number of planning permissions being granted

the extent to which current planning approaches cause delays to the building of new homes

innovative approaches to increasing the housing supply, for example self-build, off-site construction and direct commissioning by central government and local housing companies

the role of development finance and how it can promote or constrain housing investment

The Committee would be grateful to receive written submissions by 12 September 2016. …

… Clive Betts MP, Chair of the Committee, said:

“The capacity of the homebuilding industry is a key factor in housing supply, which is simply not keeping up with demand and has left us in the midst of a crisis.

The Committee will cast a critical eye over the major homebuilders, examine the decline of small and medium-sized developers and look closely at the skills shortages, planning delays and finance issues hampering the industry.

Our wide-ranging inquiry will also explore alternative models, such as self-builds and off-site construction, to see if such innovative approaches to homebuilding can help address the country’s housing needs.”

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/communities-and-local-government-committee/news-parliament-2015/homebuilding-launch-16-17/