“MPs to be forced to drop lucrative second jobs if they stop them serving their constituents”

Aw, come on, since when did some MPs (and others in positions of influence nearer home) keep to the rules when extra money was on offer? They will say there is no conflict and blithely carry on – unless they get caught in a sting, of course.

“MPs will be forced to drop lucrative outside jobs if they “conflict” with their jobs serving their constituents, according to a proposed new code of conduct.

The MPs’ second jobs will be scrutinised by the Parliamentary standards watchdog for the first time in a major crackdown on politicians’ lucrative work away from the House of Commons.

A new code of conduct will require MPs to ensure that any outside work “does not conflict” with their day jobs representing constituents in Parliament.

The change in the rules – which are still to be approved by MPs – will radically cut back the amount of time MPs will be allowed to spend away from their constituents.

It could also make it easier for the Standards Commissioner Kathryn Hudson to stop MPs using their positions to win paid consultancy work outside the House of Commons.

An undercover investigation last year by the Telegraph found Jack Straw and Sir Malcolm Rifkind had offered to use their positions as MPs to win contracts. However they were cleared of wrongdoing by Mrs Hudson.

The new code of conduct for MPs proposes an additional rule, which have been introduced following “recent changes to other rules or issues that have become apparent during investigations”.

It says: “A member who undertakes outside employment must ensure that it does not conflict with his or her responsibilities under the Code of Conduct.”

The new draft code – the first for four years – has been signed off by members of the House of Commons standards committee ahead if a six week consultation.

It comes after a study last year from Transparency International found that scores of MPs are being paid millions of pounds a year for outside jobs.

The research found that 73 MPs were paid £3.4million in the past 12 months for “external advisory roles”, including in some cases board positions.

Tommy Sheppard, a member of the committee, said: “Most members of the public will take umbrage when MPs suggest doing this job is not a full time, or your principle, job.

“You should not be doing this on a part time basis; it is a full time wage and if you are doing the job properly it is well more than a 40 hour week.

“There needs to be some clarity in the system that when you are elected as an MP it is expected that it is a full time job and you do it on a full time basis.”

Mr Sheppard said the new presumption would be that MPs “usually” should not take second jobs but there could be exceptions such as for medical professionals or doctors.

He said: “There needs to be some a limit on any outside employment, either by remuneration or by hours undertaken. So that the second job is clearly seen as secondary.

There are people in this place who in terms of remuneration it would be hard to describe this any anything other than a part time job.”

Mr Sheppard said that the change to the code – which is open to comment from members of the public until November 30 – could be expanded to include MPs who are accused of using their positions to try to consultancy work.

Last year a Telegraph investigation showed how Sir Malcolm and Mr Straw had offered to use their positions as politicians on behalf of a fictitious Chinese company in return for at least £5,000 a day while they were MPs.

Mrs Hudson cleared Sir Malcolm and Mr Straw of wrongdoing”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/10/mps-to-be-forced-to-drop-lucrative-second-jobs-if-they-stop-them/

Midas does turn everything and everyone it touches into gold!

“Property Personality of the Year

Winner: Karime Hassan, chief executive and growth director at Exeter City Council

In his time as chief executive of Exeter City Council, Hassan has earned a great reputation as a man who gets things done. His efforts have ensured that Exeter is well and truly open for business.”

Sponsored by: Midas Group

whose Chairman, Steve Hindley, is Chairman of the Local Enterprise Partnership and:

Chairman of Midas Group, Steve Hindley CBE DL, has been appointed Chairman of the CBI Construction Council, the first time a leader of a regional/mid market size business has held the post. Here he makes the case for construction as a driver of the local and national economy.

My new role is a significant one because the council represents the entire industry – designers, constructors, supply chain and specialist contractors – as a single point of contact with Government. …

Exeter is a very good example of this where projects undertaken by Midas Group are worth millions to the local economy. These include new work at Exeter University, the new Atass building on Exeter Business Park for Summerfied Developments, major retail projects for John Lewis Partnership, Waitrose and Morrisons and an extension to the Business Park at Hill Barton”

Property Personality of the Year is NOT listed on the Categories / Nominations Page – so presumably they were not accepting public nominations for this prize and Hassan was nominated by persons unknown.

As stated, ECC was NOT nominated for Local Authority of the Year – this was won by Plymouth City Council (shortlisted: East Devon District Council, Bristol City Council, Somerset County Council)so Owl wonders how its Hassan, CEO scored so highly for his award when his council did not.

and on that win by Plymouth City Council, note:

Local Authority of the Year
Winner: Plymouth City Council

Our judges said Plymouth City Council has demonstrated an exceptional and proactive approach to the built environment in the last 12 months. It has an innovative approach to planning infrastructure and housing needs and has a compelling vision for a waterfront city.”

Shortlisted: East Devon District Council, Bristol City Council, Somerset County Council”

We learn on the Plymouth City Council building front:

Midas recently started work on the landmark £3.6million Performing Arts Centre building at Plymouth University.

It is also leading renovation works at the £12million rejuvenation of North Prospect for Plymouth Community Homes.

Other major contracts in Plymouth include the £5million extension to the Kawasaki Precision Engineering factory in Ernesettle.

It is also building the £5million Frobisher House student digs project, funded by a Jersey-based private equity group, in Ebrington Street.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/city-construction-sector-s-thriving-says-midas/story-19715564-detail/story.html

Should you not know the story about King Midas yo umight want to reflecton its ending here:

http://www.primaryresources.co.uk/english/kingmidas.htm

Pro-Leave MP calls own government “fundamentally undemocratic, unconstitutional and cutting across the rights and privileges of the legislature”.

A pro-leave Tory MP has applied for an urgent debate on Brexit in an attempt to prevent the government from negotiating the terms for leaving the EU without consulting parliament.

Stephen Phillips, who voted to leave in the referendum, said the government appeared intent on negotiating “without any regard to the House of Commons” in a way that was “fundamentally undemocratic, unconstitutional and cuts across the rights and privileges of the legislature”.

Phillips said: “I and many others did not exercise our vote in the referendum so as to restore the sovereignty of this parliament only to see what we regarded as the tyranny of the European Union replaced by that of a government that apparently wishes to ignore the views of the house on the most important issue facing the nation.”

Phillips said he voted to leave for reasons of restoring sovereignty but was not a supporter of the official leave campaign.

The barrister, a member of the public accounts committee, said it was apparent after the Conservative party conference that the government had no intention of consulting parliament about its negotiating aims, and this was “simply not an acceptable way for the executive to proceed”.

He said Theresa May’s government had “no authority or mandate to adopt a negotiating position without reference to the wishes of the house and those of the British people expressed through their elected representatives”.

He has written to the Speaker, John Bercow, to request the urgent debate for this week, which will be ruled on later on Monday.

Asked about Phillips’s comments, the prime minister’s spokesman said it was absolutely necessary for MPs to scrutinise the process of leaving the EU but that MPs should not be given a vote on the package negotiated.

He said: “Parliament is of course going to debate and scrutinise that process as it goes on. That is absolutely necessary and the right thing to do. But having a second vote, or a vote to second-guess the will of the British people, is not an acceptable way forward.”

There appears to be growing disquiet among MPs – both from the leave and remain camps – about the government’s decision to press ahead with triggering article 50, which starts the two-year “divorce process”, without consulting parliament about the kind of relationship the UK should have with the EU in the future.

Phillips’s application for the debate was in addition to former Labour leader Ed Miliband’s unsuccessful request for an urgent question on the issue in the Commons. Instead of the question, David Davis, the Brexit secretary, is due to give a statement on plans to repeal the European Communities Act 1972.

[Ed] ….Miliband told the Observer: “Having claimed that the referendum was about returning sovereignty to Britain, it would be a complete outrage if May were to determine the terms of Brexit without a mandate from parliament.

“There is no mandate for a ‘hard Brexit’, and I don’t believe there is a majority in parliament for [it] either. Given the importance of these decisions for the UK economy … it has to be a matter for MPs.”

Nick Clegg, the former Liberal Democrat leader, said: “My great worry is that while there will be a vote on repealing the 1972 European Communities Act, which is about the decision to leave the EU, it will be left to the executive alone to decide the terms of Brexit. That would not be remotely acceptable.”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/oct/10/tory-mp-anna-soubry-concerned-rush-hard-brexit

Keep a very good eye on your laptop at Hinkley C!

“It was an unusual burglary, in which four or five laptops were stolen from a Scottish renewable energy manufacturer in the dead of a March night in 2011. So innovative was the company that it had been been visited by a 60-strong delegation led by China’s then vice-premier only two months before.

Nothing else was taken from the company and the crime, while irritating, went unsolved and forgotten – until a few years later pictures began emerging which showed a remarkably similar project manufactured in the world’s most populous country.

Then some people who were involved in the Scottish company, Pelamis Wave Power, started making a connection between the break-in and the politician’s visit, which was rounded off with dinner and whisky tasting at Edinburgh Castle hosted by the then Scottish secretary, Michael Moore.

Max Carcas, who was business development director at Pelamis until 2012, said the similarities between the Scottish and Chinese products were striking. Speaking publicly for the first time, he said: “Some of the details may be different but they are clearly testing a Pelamis concept.”

It might be that China’s engineers had been working along roughly the same lines as the UK engineers. Or it may be that China attempted to replicate the design based on pictures of the Pelamis project freely available on the web.

Or there could be a darker explanation: that Pelamis was targeted by China, which has been repeatedly accused of pursuing an aggressive industrial espionage strategy. The answer matters, given security concerns raised by the government’s award of the Hinkley Point nuclear contract to China.

“It was a tremendous feather in our cap to be the only place in the UK outside of London that the Chinese vice-premier visited,” Carcas said. “We did have a break-in about 10 weeks after, when a number of laptops were stolen. It was curious that whoever broke in went straight to our office on the second floor rather than the other company on the first floor or the ground floor.”

Carcas, who is now managing director of the renewable energy consultancy Caelulum, added: “I could infer all sorts of things but I do not want to say.”

Ironically, Pelamis is now defunct but the Chinese product, Hailong (Dragon) 1, still appears to be under development.

Scotland has been at the forefront of the development of wave technology for decades. Pelamis was one of the cutting-edge companies, originally named the Ocean Power Delivery company when founded in 1998 and renamed Pelamis Wave Power in 2007.

The company, which employed a staff of 50, developed a giant energy wave machine, which it named Pelamis. It looked like a metal snake, facing directly into the waves, harnessing the power of the sea. It had a unique hinged joint system that helped regulate energy flow as waves ran down its length.

Other revolutionary features included a sophisticated control system and a quick mechanism for releasing it into the sea and recovering it. In 2004, it became the first wave energy machine to generate electricity into the grid.

China expressed interest in December 2010 in an email to Pelamis: “It is decided that His Excellency, Mr Li Keqiang, vice-premier of the state council of China, and the delegation (60 people) headed by him will pay a visit to the Pelamis Sea Energy Converter between 16.40 and 17.00 on Sunday 9 January.”

Li, who is now premier of China, was accompanied by other senior Chinese government officials and was shown round the key stages in the construction of Pelamis at the site in Leith, Edinburgh.

Moore was his host for the visit and recalled the Chinese had been very impressed. Asked about the coincidence of the visit, the break-in and emergence of a similar Chinese project, Moore said: “I am afraid I am not going to speculate. It is intriguing.”

The day was rounded off with the dinner at the castle. A Scottish government memo setting out the itinerary said: “Evening dinner at castle with whisky tasting, Scottish dancing, crown jewels.”

Any faint hopes that the Chinese might invest in the Pelamis project proved fruitless however. Three years later, in November 2014, Pelamis went into administration, having run out of funding after 17 years developing the project at a cost of £95m.

Two months after the Chinese visit, on the night of Monday 22 March 2011, the Pelamis office was broken into. The burglar – or burglars – managed to get through a perimeter fence and then the front door. They skipped the first-floor office of the German engineering giant Siemens and continued to Pelamis on the second floor.

Police Scotland, in a statement confirming the break-in, said no one had ever been caught. “Entry was forced to a business premises on Bath Road in Edinburgh between 11pm 21 March and 6.45 am on 22 March 2011,” the police said.

“A number of laptops, collectively worth a four-figure sum, were stolen from within. Officers conducted extensive inquiries at the time and any new information received will be thoroughly investigated.”

Break-ins at dockyards are not unusual. Pelamis had suffered before when copper cables were stolen from its site. But theft of laptops from its office was a first.

The pictures from China, show that the product, as well as looking roughly the same, also seems to have specific features such as a similar-looking hinged joint system and a similar system for placing in and recovering the project from the sea. Tests on the Hailong 1 were carried out in in 2014 and again in 2015 but on both occasions the tests had to be suspended because of rough seas.

It was an unusual burglary, in which four or five laptops were stolen from a Scottish renewable energy manufacturer in the dead of a March night in 2011. So innovative was the company that it had been been visited by a 60-strong delegation led by China’s then vice-premier only two months before.

Nothing else was taken from the company and the crime, while irritating, went unsolved and forgotten – until a few years later pictures began emerging which showed a remarkably similar project manufactured in the world’s most populous country.

Then some people who were involved in the Scottish company, Pelamis Wave Power, started making a connection between the break-in and the politician’s visit, which was rounded off with dinner and whisky tasting at Edinburgh Castle hosted by the then Scottish secretary, Michael Moore.

Max Carcas, who was business development director at Pelamis until 2012, said the similarities between the Scottish and Chinese products were striking. Speaking publicly for the first time, he said: “Some of the details may be different but they are clearly testing a Pelamis concept.

[see images in original article]

It might be that China’s engineers had been working along roughly the same lines as the UK engineers. Or it may be that China attempted to replicate the design based on pictures of the Pelamis project freely available on the web.

Or there could be a darker explanation: that Pelamis was targeted by China, which has been repeatedly accused of pursuing an aggressive industrial espionage strategy. The answer matters, given security concerns raised by the government’s award of the Hinkley Point nuclear contract to China.

“It was a tremendous feather in our cap to be the only place in the UK outside of London that the Chinese vice-premier visited,” Carcas said. “We did have a break-in about 10 weeks after, when a number of laptops were stolen. It was curious that whoever broke in went straight to our office on the second floor rather than the other company on the first floor or the ground floor.”

Carcas, who is now managing director of the renewable energy consultancy Caelulum, added: “I could infer all sorts of things but I do not want to say.”

Ironically, Pelamis is now defunct but the Chinese product, Hailong (Dragon) 1, still appears to be under development.

Scotland has been at the forefront of the development of wave technology for decades. Pelamis was one of the cutting-edge companies, originally named the Ocean Power Delivery company when founded in 1998 and renamed Pelamis Wave Power in 2007.

The company, which employed a staff of 50, developed a giant energy wave machine, which it named Pelamis. It looked like a metal snake, facing directly into the waves, harnessing the power of the sea. It had a unique hinged joint system that helped regulate energy flow as waves ran down its length.

Other revolutionary features included a sophisticated control system and a quick mechanism for releasing it into the sea and recovering it. In 2004, it became the first wave energy machine to generate electricity into the grid.

China expressed interest in December 2010 in an email to Pelamis: “It is decided that His Excellency, Mr Li Keqiang, vice-premier of the state council of China, and the delegation (60 people) headed by him will pay a visit to the Pelamis Sea Energy Converter between 16.40 and 17.00 on Sunday 9 January.”

China’s Vice Premier Li Keqiang (C) is escorted on a tour of the Pelamis Wave Power factory on January 9, 2011 in Edinburgh, Scotland.
Li Keqiang (centre) is escorted on a tour of the Pelamis factory on 9 January 2011 in Edinburgh. Photograph: WPA Pool/Getty Images
Li, who is now premier of China, was accompanied by other senior Chinese government officials and was shown round the key stages in the construction of Pelamis at the site in Leith, Edinburgh.

Moore was his host for the visit and recalled the Chinese had been very impressed. Asked about the coincidence of the visit, the break-in and emergence of a similar Chinese project, Moore said: “I am afraid I am not going to speculate. It is intriguing.”

The day was rounded off with the dinner at the castle. A Scottish government memo setting out the itinerary said: “Evening dinner at castle with whisky tasting, Scottish dancing, crown jewels.”

Any faint hopes that the Chinese might invest in the Pelamis project proved fruitless however. Three years later, in November 2014, Pelamis went into administration, having run out of funding after 17 years developing the project at a cost of £95m.

Two months after the Chinese visit, on the night of Monday 22 March 2011, the Pelamis office was broken into. The burglar – or burglars – managed to get through a perimeter fence and then the front door. They skipped the first-floor office of the German engineering giant Siemens and continued to Pelamis on the second floor.

Police Scotland, in a statement confirming the break-in, said no one had ever been caught. “Entry was forced to a business premises on Bath Road in Edinburgh between 11pm 21 March and 6.45 am on 22 March 2011,” the police said.

“A number of laptops, collectively worth a four-figure sum, were stolen from within. Officers conducted extensive inquiries at the time and any new information received will be thoroughly investigated.”

Break-ins at dockyards are not unusual. Pelamis had suffered before when copper cables were stolen from its site. But theft of laptops from its office was a first.

The pictures from China, show that the product, as well as looking roughly the same, also seems to have specific features such as a similar-looking hinged joint system and a similar system for placing in and recovering the project from the sea. Tests on the Hailong 1 were carried out in in 2014 and again in 2015 but on both occasions the tests had to be suspended because of rough seas.

The Hailong 1 appears to have been built at the Number 710 Research Institute, part of the Chinese Shipbuilding Industry Corporation, a commercial operation. The institute is also involved in developing military projects.

The Guardian sent a series of questions to the Chinese government asking for details about the origins of the Hailong 1 project but has had no reply. There is no suggestion that the Chinese premier is connected with the company or that he knows anything about the burglary.

Despite the similarities, neither the UK nor Scottish governments has any plans to challenge China over the patent. Calum Macfarlane, a spokesman for Wave Energy Scotland, said: “The IP [intellectual property] is not protected in China.”

Carn Gibson, who spent 15 years at Pelamis, where he was engineering manager, is disappointed that funding for the Pelamis project could not be found in the UK and appeared sanguine about the Chinese design.

Gibson, who is now senior consulting engineer at Quoceant, a new company that grew out of Pelamis, said he regarded it as a compliment that the Chinese may have thought it was an idea worth copying, especially if they were able to turn it into a viable commercial proposition. He was rueful though that it was being developed in the South China Sea rather than the Atlantic.”

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/10/mysterious-factory-break-in-raises-suspicions-about-chinese-visit

Chartered Institute of Housebuilding tells government to build more affordable rent homes

“…The professional body for the sector made the comments as the chancellor Philip Hammond prepares to make his first major spending announcements in the Autumn Statement on 23 November.

At the Conservative Party conference last week, the chancellor and local government secretary Sajid Javid unveiled a £3bn housebuilding fund, and outlined plans to directly commission the construction of homes on publicly owned land. The aim is to build 25,000 new homes before 2020.

The CIH welcomed the announcements and recommended a range of further initiatives in its submission to ministers.

It called on the government to focus on substantially increasing the number of affordable rented homes in the UK. It also recommended increasing funding for regeneration, improving standards in the private rented sector, and renewing the fight against homelessness.

Gavin Smart, deputy chief executive of CIH, said: “We welcome the level of focus on housing by the government recently; in particular the acknowledgement that enhancing affordability will be central to solving our housing crisis.

“We believe that the Autumn Statement is the opportunity to turn this commitment into action and build a substantial amount of new properties at affordable rents. This is the only way we can really begin to tackle our housing crisis and make sure people of all incomes have access to a home they can afford.”

Among its other recommendations, CIH urged the government to follow through on pledges to introduce greater flexibility for affordable homes funding.

It also advised the government to allow councils to borrow more for housebuilding through “reshaping and extending” the housing revenue account borrowing provisions. Currently, councils are limited in how much they can borrow under a cap introduced when councils were made self-financing for housing debt in 2012.

The CIH also said local authorities should be exempt for the remaining stages of the scheme to cut social housing rents in exchange for extra investment in rented homes.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/10/autumn-statement-must-deliver-government-housing-promises-says-cih

No comment …

… “Exeter City Council has [also] celebrated success at another awards ceremony recently. Its chief executive and growth director Karime Hassan was named Property Personality of the Year at the Insider’s annual South West Property Awards in Bristol.” …

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/exeter-city-council-scoops-award-for-hosting-radio-1-big-weekend/story-29794037-detail/story.html

Towns being pressurised to take the strain from rural areas?

Two articles below from the Rural Services network are essentially telling the same story: it’s too expensive to fund rural communities (particularly health and social care for older people) so let’s increase densities in towns and persuade people to live there instead.

What seems to be the message is “build it and they will come” – but who will come and why?

If you have no primary school, no doctor, no bus service in your rural village are you expected to up sticks and move to a town or city where housing density increases and these services are supposedly more easily accessed and where transport is supposedly better?

Very little of the new housing in towns and cities is affordable or built for low-income families or pensioners. Infrastructure is not being built to service the new houses (roads in Cranbrook are still unadopted) and doctors are stretched to their limit with current patients.

Community hospitals are likely to be closed in half of our towns, so, in a deepest rural area you will actually probably be closer to a community hospital than if you live in a town – if you have a car. Maternity services will be non-existent for rural parents.

What would persuade rural dwellers to move to towns where facilities are just as bad as in their villages? People who CHOSE a village carefully in the first place?

And how would those villages survive if they COULD and did move? Only the rich will soon be able to afford rural living (where no access to a “transport hub” or a school or a doctor will not worry them) and ordinary rural families and older people on average incomes will be forced into inadequate town and city properties whether they like it or not.

And why, if this IS the way of the world, is there still so much pressure to build more and more houses in these small villages?

Is this really the answer to our problems?

Cranbrook or Uplyme? Honiton or West Hill?

Soon you may have no choice.

Challenges faced by rural communities

The Rural Services Network has urged the government to use its forthcoming Autumn Statement to address challenges faced by rural communities.

The network has called on Chancellor Philip Hammond to include two targeted measures in the Autumn Statement, due next month.

One measure seeks to boost economic growth and productivity in rural areas. The other seeks to improve care for older rural people.

The first policy proposal calls for investment in rural infrastructure in order to support rural growth and employment.

The network proposes that this measure focuses on improvements to rural broadband connectivity, rural public transport and better provision of affordable rural housing.
“It is important that rural economies can be productive and can grow, both for the wellbeing of rural areas themselves and as contributors to the national economy,” says the proposal.

“However, rural areas have some relative weaknesses.”
Rural weaknesses include productivity levels that are below the national average, low wages and below average capital investment by businesses, says the network.

The second policy proposal is for improvements in adult social services provision in rural areas.

The proposal calls for revenue grant funding investment to end further reductions in adult social services provision and to take account of the ageing population.

Rural areas are home to a disproportionate number of older people within their populations, which places a significant extra burden on adult social services.

“Adult social services are already over-stretched as a result of reducing local authority budgets,” says the network’s proposal.

“Many social services department have tightened up their criteria for helping residents and now focus only on high priority cases.

The network says one outcome is that many older people are not discharged from hospital as quickly as they otherwise could be, which is an additional cost for the NHS.

“Growing demand for adult social services risks taking the situation to breaking point.

“It is acknowledged that upper tier local authorities are being allowed to raise their portion of Council Tax income by an extra 2% to help address this concern.

“This, however, does not keep pace with rising costs faced by the sector, including those from National Minimum Wage and National Insurance increases.”

The network wants funding for adult social services protected, as it is for the NHS.

Central government could achieve this with a specific extra grant to upper tier local authorities, says the proposal.
Despite attempts to protect frontline services, in the 2014/15 financial year the relevant authorities were planning budget reductions of £420m for adult social services.

A slightly larger sum would be needed to account for the growing number of older people.

Nationally, some £1bn would be needed to stop further service reductions or pressures in just one financial year, says the network.

More appropriate levels of formal care for older rural people would reduce pressure on and save costs in the NHS, it says.

These benefits would not only accrue to rural areas, but they would be particularly valuable there given their population profiles, it adds.

http://www.rsnonline.org.uk/services/network-urges-chancellor-to-address-rural-challenges

More attractive towns and cities can ease pressure on countryside”

“MORE attractive towns and cities would ease development pressure on the countryside, say rural campaigners.

Housing should be developed alongside transport infrastructure for economic, social and environmental benefits, says the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE).

The charity argues that high-density development near to high-quality public transport services could boost businesses and jobs.

It also calls for more well-designed homes and more diverse, exciting communities, arguing that they would reduce pressure on the Green Belt and the wider countryside.

The recommendations are made in CPRE’s ‘Making the Link’ paper which, it says, builds on emerging government thinking.

CPRE policy adviser Trinley Walker said: “To build the homes we need and make our towns attractive for residents and businesses, housing development and transport must go hand in hand.

“Good access to public transport should be an important factor when councils make decisions about where to build houses – yet it often gets side-lined.

“This means that in many towns the potential for regeneration, quality housing and better connected communities is missed.”

The paper highlights the government’s recent NPPF consultation identified 680 commuter hubs suitable for high density development.

It argues that attention can also be given to smaller places like market towns, which delivering connectivity, services, employment and business opportunities for rural communities.
Situating high-density housing near transport hubs can concentrate development on brownfield sites in need of regeneration and increase connectivity to employment centres, says the paper.

This has the potential to make towns more attractive for residents and business, halt damaging urban sprawl and reduce car use and road congestion, it argues.

The paper suggests a number of options to encourage such development.

These include reduced business rates for local businesses and the roll-out of planning tools to help identify suitable locations for development.

The paper calls for higher-density development based around public transport hubs, planned around local services and waking and cycling.

High density development needn’t mean tower blocks in market towns, it says.

Terraced housing and mansion blocks can provide high density homes and preserve the unique character of towns, the paper argues.

‘Making the Link’ is the sixth paper in CPRE’s Housing Foresight series, which aims to provide innovative policy solutions to critical housing issues.”

http://www.rsnonline.org.uk/environment/cities-can-ease-pressure-on-countryside

Leave you home to grandchildren not children says Housing Minister!

“The housing minister, Gavin Barwell, has suggested that parents should leave their houses and savings to their grandchildren rather than their children to help them get on the housing ladder.

Barwell made the call for pensioners to skip a generation when writing their wills as he revealed that his 75-year-old mother had chosen to leave her £700,000 house in Croydon to her five grandchildren rather than himself and his brother.

The MP for Croydon Central, who owns a £750,000 house three miles from his mother’s, said the decision could help to reduce intergenerational financial inequities. “Generally in life we all like to think that our children are going to be better off than us. In terms of new technology and life expectancy, they are going to be,” he told a fringe meeting at the Conservative party conference in Birmingham last week.

“But at the moment, as things stand, they are less likely to own their own home and we need to do something about that.”

However, Barwell added that he did not want to live in a country where it was necessary to have a wealthy grandparent simply to get on to to the housing ladder, the Telegraph reported.”

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/oct/09/skip-a-generation-when-passing-on-homes-says-housing-minister