Moirai Capital sacked in Swindon

“Ambitious plans to build a ski slope, an arena and hotel on the North Star site have been given a last minute reprieve with the involvement of Seven Capital Investments. In December [2016], development firm Moirai Capital was served with notice that Swindon Borough Council intended to call time on the project after repeated delays and unfulfilled commitments.

Seven Capital Investments Ltd, which is also one of the UK’s leading private capital funders, has agreed in principle to acquire control of Moirai Capital Investments in order to take forward plans to transform North Star with more than £100m of investment.

Currently managing a development portfolio of more than £800 million, Seven Capital has been responsible for major property investments across the country and has identified the North Star development as an ideal opportunity for it to invest in the leisure market.

Seven Capital’s interest in the regeneration project comes after the Council served Moirai notice of its intention to terminate the development agreement covering the former Clares site, which had been earmarked for an indoor ski slope, water park, hotel and other leisure and sports-related retail.

Moirai was given until 12 January 2017 to fulfil the terms of the notice or see the development agreement terminated. But following the proposal by Seven Capital, the Council has today (11 Jan 2017) withdrawn the notice of termination.

The plans for the North Star development include a cinema, 5,000-seat entertainment arena, ski centre, range of leisure activities, restaurants and cafes, retail space and a hotel.

A period of due diligence will now be carried out by both the Council and Seven Capital which, if successful, will see the Council’s Cabinet consider whether to approve the proposal.

Seven Capital has indicated it would also work with Moirai on the Oasis site.

If Seven Capital’s proposals are supported by Cabinet, detailed planning proposals could be submitted later this year.”

http://www.ozseeker.net/2017/01/22/seven-captial-resucues-swindons-north-star/?doing_wp_cron=1487023081.3896689414978027343750

Registered voters in East Devon – time for an update?

Remember our campaign to find out why at least 6,000 voters were lost in East Devon? Here are EDDC’s current figures:

Electorate (People registered to Vote)

February 2013 104,274

February 2014 103,254

January 2015 102,849

January 2016 108,502

Strange that during the period that Cranbrook was developed and residents started moving in, figures went down every year. After EDW highlighted discrepancies – and after Returning Officer appeared before a Parliamentary committee to explain himself – (he preferred telephone registration over the advised check-up canvassers) there was a sudden jump in registrations.

EDW looks forward to seeing the figures for January 2017 very very shortly – in good time for DCC elections in May 2017.

“Offshore wind “could be cheaper than nuclear power” (And doesn’t require untold billions in decommissioning costs)

Nuclear power station on your doorstep or wind turbines on the horizon? Easy-peasy for our LEP – with its vested nuclear-interest businessmen on its board!

“Offshore windfarms could provide cheaper power than Britain’s new wave of nuclear power stations, a leading figure in the wind industry has claimed.

Speaking to the the Guardian, Hugh McNeal, the chief executive of trade body RenewableUK, said he expected that offshore windfarms would secure a deal with the government lower than the £92.50 per megawatt hour agreed with EDF for £18bn Hinkley Point C.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if it [offshore wind] cleared Hinkley prices,” he said of the bidding for a £290m-a-year government subsidy pot in April. The auction is under a scheme known as contracts for difference, which offer generators a guaranteed price for their electricity above the wholesale price. A 35-year deal with EDF was agreed last year.

McNeal, a career civil servant who joined RenewableUK from the now abolished Department of Energy and Climate Change last year, was upbeat about the future of offshore wind.

“I don’t think there’s any doubt about the political commitment of any party, apart from perhaps Ukip, to offshore wind. I think it’s got an incredibly healthy future,” he said.

Construction of offshore and onshore windfarms in the UK was responsible for €12.7bn (£11bn) of investment in 2016, or nearly half the year’s financial activity for new wind power in the EU.

The industry has also been buoyed by recent figures showing the price of offshore wind power had fallen by nearly one-third since 2012 to £100/MWh, a crucial milestone as the government will only continue to subsidise the technology if costs go down.

But McNeal said the decision by ministers to end onshore windfarm subsidies had been hard for the industry. The building of new turbines on land is expected to largely grind to a halt after next year.

Green energy subsidies are paid through energy bills, but MPs said last week that government efforts to communicate the impact on consumers had been “shambolic.” McNeal said he found the focus solely on the cost of new low-carbon power “a little bit odd” given the other factors driving energy price rises.

Three of the UK’s big six energy suppliers have announced price increases as their costs have risen, the bulk of which are higher wholesale prices. “We are perhaps a little bit overexposed to global markets over which we have no control, which fluctuate over time,” McNeal said.

Government officials should do more to spell out all the costs of energy to consumers, he added. The impact of renewable energy subsidies on bills has previously been broken down, but the effect on bills from subsidies to coal power stations for providing backup power, for example, are not.
However, McNeal defended the Conservative party, arguing it was unfairly derided as anti-renewables. “We have to actually just look at what’s been achieved,” he said.

“I’m not saying to you that there isn’t a challenge around the [Conservative] onshore wind manifesto commitment; of course there is. But the record is still a pretty remarkable one.”

Renewable energy supplies one-quarter of Britain’s electricity, he said, compared with a marginal amount before the 2010 general election, when the first of three Conservative-led governments came to power.

McNeal would not be drawn on whether Labour’s energy policy, which is pro-renewables and pro-nuclear, but would ban fracking for shale gas, was credible. But he said questions of energy supply should be depoliticised.
“I don’t think it’s my job to tell any party what its energy policy should be. Let’s just take the heat out of all this,” he said. “I just don’t think it does anyone any good to be in public fighting between different forms of technologies.”

Despite saying last year that new onshore windfarms in England were “very unlikely”, McNeal suggested the technology would come back because it was so cheap. “I don’t think onshore is done at all. I think onshore wind has a terrific future in our country,” he said.

McNeal said he was confident that wind power in the UK would thrive after Brexit, even though the industry’s growth had so far been driven in part by binding EU renewable targets for 2020.

“The idea that we need a separate European package [of support] – that would be the crucial thing that would drive our industry – we don’t need that now,” he said, adding that the sector would win on market terms.
© 2017 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.”

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/feb/12/uk-offshore-wind-will-lower-energy-bills-more-than-nuclear?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

“Lack of interest sees Exmouth Mayor’s Ball cancelled”

The Mayor of Exmouth, Councillor Brian Cole, said: “Due to a lack of support, I regretfully have to announce that the 2017 Mayor’s Ball has been cancelled. Despite receiving support from local businesses, there has not been enough interest to enable me to ensure that I could hold the ball without running at a loss.

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/lack_of_interest_sees_exmouth_mayor_s_ball_cancelled_1_4883355

Might it also be that many people in Exmouth are none too happy with the council and the Mayor’s recent decisions and therefore feel unable to support their extra-curricular activities?

Newcastle consults on transfer of parks and allotments to new charitable trust

“Newcastle City Council is to consult on a new funding, management and maintenance model for 33 of the city’s parks and allotments.

The proposal, if implemented, would see Newcastle’s parks and green spaces (comprising more than 400 hectares of land) remain the property of the city council but day-to-day responsibility for funding, managing and maintaining them transferred to a charitable trust.

The council has been awarded £237,500 by the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) to test the approach.

This money will be used to: construct a business case and legal structure for the trust to operate the council’s parks and allotments; and if implemented, put the governance in place and deliver training to the new trustees, staff and volunteers.

The HLF has, together with the Big Lottery Fund, already invested more than £12m to restore and upgrade the city’s parks. It has been calling on local and national government, communities and businesses to explore innovative ways to fund and maintain public parks.

Newcastle said the scheme had been designed “to help tackle the financial challenges facing the local authority, where park budgets have been dramatically reduced”.

It pointed out that parks were not a statutory service for local authorities but many recognised their vital importance to the health and well-being of local communities.

The city council is working alongside the National Trust to deliver the project. The authority will also explore whether an endowment could be put in place to support the proposed trust, and is required by the HLF to share its findings about the scheme with other councils.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=30024%3Anewcastle-consults-on-transfer-of-parks-and-allotments-to-new-charitable-trust&catid=58&Itemid=26

Nuclear power plants to need massive taxpayer subsidies

Ministers forced to throw taxpayers’ cash at nuclear plants – and in the meantime the wind blows, the sun shines and the tides turn.

Ministers are poised to admit that taxpayer cash will be used to fund a new fleet of nuclear power stations — reversing years of government opposition to direct public subsidy.

With Britain’s ageing coal plants due to shut by 2025, the government is banking on new nuclear reactors going up at sites including Wylfa in Anglesey, north Wales, and Moorside in Cumbria.

Successive energy ministers have insisted that no public cash will be used to fund this new generation. Yet industry sources claim the business and energy secretary, Greg Clark, accepts that this hands-off approach cannot persist if the plants are to be built. They say Whitehall is preparing to launch a consultation, possibly this summer, on the government taking minority equity stakes in new nuclear projects to kick-start their construction.

“The penny has finally dropped,” said a senior source in the nuclear sector. “It is the government’s duty to keep the lights on. The government now gets this.”

The refusal to award subsidies has been a constant in the nuclear debate. In 2010, when the coalition government sanctioned the creation of new stations, the then energy secretary Chris Huhne said: “There will be no public subsidy.”

Instead, ministers have demanded companies rather than British taxpayers bear the construction risks of the multibillion-pound projects.
It has not quite worked out that way. EDF and CGN — arms of the French and Chinese governments respectively — last year committed to spend £18bn on the Hinkley Point power station in Somerset, after being guaranteed a price for the plant’s electricity.

The future of the NuGen consortium building the Cumbrian plant will be thrown into doubt this week when the financially troubled Japanese industrial giant Toshiba confirms its retreat from the industry.

To ensure the plant is built, British taxpayer cash will probably be matched with funds from the Japanese government, possibly via the Japan Bank for International Cooperation and Nippon Export and Investment Insurance.
Japan’s Hitachi, which is behind the Wylfa project, is locked in talks with the British and Japanese governments over how to fund the 2.7-gigawatt station. The consultation on state equity is likely to be launched alongside an outline deal on funding Wylfa. Sources said the deal and the consultation are not certain and could yet collapse.

New support for nuclear will form a key pillar of Theresa May’s industrial strategy. But the Treasury remains desperate to keep the power stations, each of which will cost more than £10bn, off the government’s stretched balance sheet.

That will limit Britain to minority equity stakes, possibly up to 25% to 30%, in the new projects.”

Source: Times Newspapers Limited (paywall)

Diviani steps down from DCC “to concentrate on being Leader of EDDC”

Honiton and Tiverton Conservative constituency has announced its candidates for DCC elections:

We have now completed the selection of our candidates to stand for the Conservative Party at the Devon County Council elections in May 2017. Paul Diviani has withdrawn his candidacy to concentrate solely on Leading East Devon District Council.

Therefore the candidates are as follows:-

Axminster, Ian Hall
Seaton and Colyton, Helen Parr
Feniton and Honiton, Phil Twiss
Whimple and Blackdown, Iain Chubb
Tiverton East, Colin Slade
Tiverton West, Polly Colthorpe
Willand and Uffculme, Ray Radford,
Cullompton and Bradnich, John Berry

https://www.tivertonhonitonconservatives.co.uk

Oh poor, unlucky DCC to be missing out on all his experience …

And Councillor Moulding presumably needs to keep his eye on those Bovis builders in Axminster, some of whose purchasers are none too happy with the quality of their homes.

Still, with his work on increasing housing numbers for the Local Enterprise Partnership AND all the developments going on all over East Devon, those developers will be needing a firm hand … AND there is “Greater Exeter” to be sorted too …

Seaton: “dark net” dealing in LSD from the town says Sunday Times

The Sunday Times is doing an investigation into the “dark net” – a hidden part of the internet where criminal activities take place.

A map with their article (page 11 of main newspaper) titled “Dark Net Dealings around Britain” highlights Seaton with “LSD” against it, and the article says:

Our investigation found 14 accounts on the dark net that had posted photographs of their illegal wares taken from locations ranging from Troon in Scotland to the seaside town of Seaton in Devon, according to the metadata.

Might this be connected to the recent high-profile kidnapping and armed robbery trials which featured residents of the town in newspapers last week?

“Javid’s plans for housing fall woefully short” says Telegraph

“The biggest barrier to social mobility and social progress is our broken housing market,” said Sajid Javid, while launching his long-awaited housing White Paper last week. “Fixing it means taking on tough vested interests.” The Communities Secretary is right on both counts. But if this White Paper is a genuine guide to future government action, it isn’t up to the job

Over the last 20 years, amid soaring demand, we’ve built around two and a half million too few homes across the UK. This yawning supply-demand gap has made ownership ever more unaffordable. The average house today costs almost eight times average earnings – an all-time record, the ratio having doubled since 1997. …”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/02/11/sajid-javids-plans-housing-fall-woefully-short/

If the Telegraph doesn’t like it, it myst be rubbish!

Has EDDC’s new Manstone depot satellite office block been included in relocation costs?

The following Freedom of Information request implies that the cost may not have been included, but we shall see, we hope.

Owl wonders why just one set of employees has been left in Sidmouth in brand new offices and why they could not be accommodated on the Honiton site or the Exmouth site. Surely, THREE sets of offices will be MUCH more expensive to run than one HQ? But cost barely seem to concern Tory councillors, who seem to feel there is little need to scrutinise them.

“Laissez les bons temps rouler!”

“Dear Ms Symington,

I would like to make a formal request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. I am also making this request under the Environmental Impact Regulations 2004 which require disclosure on the part of Local Authorities.

On 22nd December, I corresponded with the Planning Department with regard to the Council’s planning application for offices for its Estates Department at the Manstone Depot in Sidmouth: https://planning.eastdevon.gov.uk/online…

Several of my questions were answered, but not the following:

“The site is now clearly part of the District Council’s relocation project. This application represents the relocation of one of the key departments from the Knowle site – and yet there has been no mention in the Moving and Improving site pages: http://eastdevon.gov.uk/moving-and-impro…
“And I am unable to find any other information about this relocation of the Estates Department elsewhere.”

Could you provide me with any such references to this project (other than the planning application itself), either as documentation or weblinks.

And could you provide me with the full and exact costings for this planning application: the building costs of the new offices and where the finance for this project will be coming from.

On 9th January, the District Council stated the following to the press:

“The transfer of depot activities is an existing costed element of the relocation project and, as such, included within the independent and positive cost modelling of relocation.”
http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/dis…

Could you provide me with the documentation which shows how the transfer of depot activities is an existing costed element of the relocation project.

And could you indicate exactly where this information is located within the independent and positive cost modelling of relocation.

I would be grateful if you could answer the four stipulated questions above.

Thank you.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours faithfully,
Jeremy Woodward
Sidmouth”

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/costing_the_relocating_of_the_es

“Rabbit hutch Britain”

“Get ready for a new wave of “micro-homes” – tiny flats, often in converted office buildings, that are roughly the size of a typical bedroom yet supposedly big enough for two people to live in.

Such properties are already springing up. Guardian Money tracked down a miniscule, newish studio flat in the centre of Croydon that measures just 14.9 sq m (160 sq ft), even though government guidance states that the minimum floor area for any new home is 37 sq m.

We were also passed drawings of plans for an eight-flat development in Archway, north London – in Jeremy Corbyn’s Islington North constituency – where two of the “apartments” measured just 13.5 sq m (145 sq ft). That’s a room measuring just 12ft by 12ft. Perhaps thankfully, the plans were refused by the council but may yet reappear in modified form.

Some experts worry that we could see many more shoebox homes popping up following publication this week of the government’s housing white paper. Britain’s new-build homes are already the smallest in Europe, prompting claims that many families are living in “rabbit hutch-sized” properties that are so cramped there isn’t enough space for them to live comfortably, sit down and eat together or even store necessities such as a vacuum cleaner. But could the UK now be facing a fresh squeeze on the size of its homes?

Ministers have admitted that England’s housing market is “broken”, and have set out a number of measures aimed at fixing it. But some commentators were alarmed at the suggestion that, as part of efforts to make “better use” of land for housing, home sizes may have to shrink further.

The white paper included a proposal to review the guidance on minimum sizes for new homes “to ensure greater local housing choice”, even though it has only been in force since October 2015. It said the government was concerned that a “one size fits all approach may not reflect the needs and aspirations of a wider range of households, and could be hindering innovative approaches to meeting demand”.

The guidance – known officially as the “nationally described space standard” – gives local authorities the option to set minimum sizes for new homes. Despite not being compulsory, it is starting to reverse the trend for smaller properties, says the Royal Institute of British Architects (Riba), which is urging the government not to remove or water down the standard.

What is undeniable is that many new builds are “bijou”, to say the least. In 2014, researchers from Cambridge University found that, at an average of 76 sq m, the UK’s newly built homes were the smallest by floor area in Europe. At the other end of the spectrum was Denmark at 137 sq m (having all that space probably helps explain why it is allegedly the world’s happiest country).

As recently as December 2015, Riba research showed that more than half of the new homes under construction were too small to meet the needs of the people who buy them. It found that homes in Yorkshire were the smallest in England, with the average new three-bedroom property about 25 sq m smaller than one in London (84 sq m versus 108.5 sq m). …

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2017/feb/11/welcome-rabbit-hutch-britain-land-ever-shrinking-home

Cranbrook New Community Manager – salary up to £47,632

“We are looking for a highly motivated individual to lead the Council’s planning team in achieving the vision for Cranbrook to develop as a vibrant and sustainable new community. Cranbrook is already a thriving community that is home to over 3000 people. You will be at the forefront of guiding the expansion to nearly 8000 homes and delivering the work spaces and community infrastructure needed to ensure that it is a truly sustainable new town.”

https://jobs.theguardian.com/job/6463206/cranbrook-new-community-manager/

Good luck with that job!

Cranbrook: Facebook page created to complain about problems with district heating

The page is called:

“Cranbrook District Heat by eon is Useless”

Although it is new, it has already attracted more than 50 members and E.on is said to be arranging a meeting on the subject.

A selection of comments (and remember this is an 80 year monopoly contract where developers collect fees):

No hot water again in Brooks Warren. Called Eon and yes, rubbish customer services yet again. ” [E.on] We do not know of any problems, someone will be in contact within 24 hrs.”

“Just had a call from Eon to say there is a site issue (AGAIN). They are hoping to get everything up and running by the end of the day.
Yet again another problem and yet again we are all suffering with the lack of services.”

“Went to have a shower this morning around 11:00, yep you guessed it no hot water. Called e.on and they said they had no reports of problems, perhaps I’m the first to report I said. Absolutely useless, notice several others having problems on the other Cranbrook facebook page.”

“We had an Eon engineer over today. He told us that we should avoid peak times to use got water e.g. between 6am and 8am, and 6pm to 8pm. Apparently they should fix it in a week… They recognise it’s a Cranbrook wide issue.”

Many councils expect to find themselves technically insolvent soon

Many councils fear that they will become technically insolvent. So what does ours do? Pursues a vanity project relocation from one HQ to an HQ with two satellite offices – one which needs a massive amount of money spent on it because estimates of cost were made before a full survey was done (Exmouth) and one that requires new build (Manstone) – all three when building costs are rising 20-35% coupled with a growing shortage of skilled labour which will push wages up.

Fiddling while Rome burns? Play that fiddle! 🎻

“Some local authorities may be forced to declare technical insolvency in the next two years, experts have said, as councils struggle to weather the financial pressures caused by budget cuts and growing demand for social care.

A survey of councils in England and Wales by the Local Government Information Unit (LGIU) thinktank found that three-quarters had little or no confidence in the sustainability of local government finances and more than one in 10 believed they were in danger of failing to meet legal requirements to deliver core services. …

… “Councils have no faith in the system. They are patching together their finances by putting up council tax, drawing down reserves and increasing charges. Increasingly they worry that they will not be able to provide the vital services that people rely on.”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/feb/10/councils-budget-cuts-social-care-bills

Banana councils, the NHS and social care

If Surrey’s ‘secret deal’ is to be a harbinger of a new health and care service then the whole murky world of local government funding needs rethinking.

The algebra is simple. The NHS is having another terrible winter. It does not collapse, but “spills demand” on to the next line of defence, local government welfare. But while the NHS gets more money annually from the Treasury, local government gets less, some 30% less since 2011. It cannot cope with the new pressure.

The equation resolves itself into rationing, by quantity and quality: fewer care places, fewer home visits and fewer district nurses leads to more bed-blocking, fewer operations, longer trolley waits.

Tory Surrey is a responsible supplier of post-hospital care. Like all councils, it is allowed by the Treasury to increase its council tax by 5%, specifically to boost its care budget and thus ease pressure on the NHS – which the Treasury is responsible for funding. Surrey county council regarded this as nothing like enough. It therefore activated its statutory right to hold a referendum on a 15% increase.

Far from showing delight at a wealthy council accepting this burden, the Tory government was appalled. Tories do not increase taxes. The chancellor (and Surrey MP) Philip Hammond duly did what Jeremy Corbyn called a secret deal. If Surrey abandoned its referendum and the 15% hike, it could retain revenue from a different tax – the local business rate, which normally went to the Treasury. That is, the Treasury would in effect spend more on health and care in Surrey, but secretly and, so far, just for Surrey.

This is the stuff of a banana republic. If Britain wants to spend more on health and elderly care, it should raise it and spend it honestly. Instead, the Treasury is running around its fiscal A&E department, staunching the flow of political blood by slamming on plasters wherever a patient screams or twists an arm.

Leaked Surrey council tax texts allow Corbyn to ambush May at PMQs
Some might argue that an NHS free at the point of delivery has had its day. New disciplines and incentives, through fees or insurance or more prevention, must constrain marginal demand. But for the time being, it makes no sense to squeeze the NHS at the top – where politicians are exposed – and dump its problems on to local government and different funding streams at the bottom. It wastes money and distorts priorities. It is illiterate public finance.

If Surrey is harbinger of a new health and care service, and business taxes are to relieve an ever-burgeoning NHS, so be it. But few places are as rich as Surrey. Revenue will have to be redistributed from rich to poor areas. In other words, it is not just the NHS that needs rethinking, but the whole murky world of local government finance.”

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/10/surrey-local-council-funding-health-care-nhs

Put a red line round your local hospital on 1 April

“COMMUNITIES across Devon will be putting a red line around each hospital in protest of their own red line to ‘no cuts to any health services anywhere in Devon.

The Success Regime is proposing large cuts to health services in Devon as part of its Sustainability and Transformation Plan (STP).

The STP proposes to cut 590 acute and community beds across Devon, cut nurses’ jobs and access to continuing care, cut acute services in North Devon and cut most of the remaining community hospitals.

Dave Clinch, North Devon media liaison for Save Our Hospitals Services, said: “They really believe when it comes to cuts, “there are no red lines”. They claim to be able to deliver a better health service at the same time as making cuts to the tune of £550 million in Devon alone.

“On April 1 communities across Devon will put a human red line around each and every hospital. This will be a visible statement of our own red line “No cuts to any health services anywhere in Devon.”

The demonstration at North Devon District Hospital will begin at midday on Saturday, April 1.

This comes after proposals of NHS cuts were leaked, which sought to tackle a projected £430 million funding shortfall in the region’s healthcare system by 2019.

In August 2016, more than 200 Barnstaple residents marched from Pilton Park to the district hospital, calling for the safeguarding of services at the hospital.

Those who took part called upon the Success Regime to ensure that acute services, such as A&E, maternity and stroke units, were protected from the cuts.

Speaking at the time, Angela Pedder, chief executive of the Success Regime, said: “We know local people care deeply about the services that Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust provides and we thank them for their continued support.

“However, we’ve been very clear that the NHS in Devon is facing both clinical and financial sustainability challenges.

“The challenges faced are set out in our Case for Change document and all health organisations in Northern, Eastern and Western Devon are working together to improve care, provide more integrated and locally tailored services, and tackle the projected £100 million a year overspend.

“The team has been working closely, as part of the Success regime programme, with NHS leaders and GPs, as well as local public and patient representatives, to develop proposals on future options for local health and care services.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/this-is-no-april-fool-communities-across-devon-to-put-red-line-around-local-hospitals/story-30126325-detail/story.html

“Care in the Community not working”

“Dr Bruce Hughes, chairman of the Devon Local Medical Committee (DLMC) which represents GPs, was speaking following a National Audit Office report today (Wednesday).

It says the Government’s £5.3billion Better Care Fund had ‘fallen far short’ of its goal of integrating health and social care.

Dr Hughes, a partner at Fremington Medical Centre, said it reaffirmed GPs’ serious concerns locally about transferring some hospital services and care into the community.

They are worried the national picture could be reflected in the sustainability and transformation plan (STP) review currently going on in Devon, which includes proposals to care for more patients in their own homes.

He said: “The report’s findings indicate that this approach doesn’t tangibly improve patient outcomes and experience, reduce emergency hospital admissions or save money – something we fear could be replicated locally as the same principle of community-based care underpins much STP.

“We urge our STP leaders to pause the transformation process in the local healthcare system and closely examine the report to ensure that the STP and its aspirations aren’t flawed.”

The DLMC wants to know how moving hospital services or treatment into the community will be paid for, as GPs and other services are already greatly stretched.

Dr Hughes added: “We look forward to working closely with STP leaders in the coming months, as general practice is the gateway to the wider healthcare system and has a crucial role to play in the successful delivery of local transformation, to ensure high quality patient care.”

The Health and Social Care Integration report claims the Better Care Fund ‘has not achieved the expected value for money, in terms of savings, outcomes for patients or hospital activity’.

It says the national initiative did not achieve the planned savings of £511 million, with an 87,000 increase in emergency admissions to hospitals between 2014-15 and 2015-16, against a planned reduction of 106,000.”

http://www.northdevongazette.co.uk/news/care_in_the_community_is_not_working_claim_devon_gps_1_4881988

Exmouth: Dinan Way extension paused by government

Yet another example of problems with the planning process in East Devon:

“In a statement issued by the National Trust this week, a spokesperson said: “We have no objection to the principle of the road, but we are concerned that the planning process designed to protect our historic environment has not been followed thoroughly.

“Conservation issues raised during the consultation period have not been addressed in the current plans.

“The National Trust’s concerns centre around the impact of the proposed route on A la Ronde, a Grade I listed building, but also on how the road might harm the wider A la Ronde setting in the longer term.

“The concerns of the National Trust are such that we felt that our only option was to submit a request to the Department for Communities and Local Government for the planning application to be considered at national level.

“Historic England, the Government’s advisory body on heritage matters, corroborates the view that the application has the ‘potential for very long-term harmful consequences to a heritage asset of the highest significance.’…”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/government-blocks-exmouth-s-dinan-way-scheme-after-national-trust-objection/story-30123973-detail/story.html

Blast at French nuclear power plant of similar design to Hinkley C

An explosion has occurred at EDF’s Flamanville nuclear plant in northern France, causing minor injuries but no risk of contamination, authorities have said.

“It is a significant technical event but it is not a nuclear accident,” Olivier Marmion, a senior local official, told AFP.

The plant 15 miles west of Cherbourg has been in operation since the 1980s.

EDF said a fire had led to a blast in the machine room of one of the two nuclear reactors. The fire had been “immediately” brought under control and the No 1 reactor disconnected from the grid, it added. A new reactor is being built at the site but the explosion did not take place there, a spokeswoman said. …”

Marmion said five people had reported feeling unwell but that there were no serious injuries, adding that rescue services were at the site.

Authorities said the incident was declared over at 11am GMT. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/feb/09/explosion-at-flamanville-nuclear-plant-in-western-france?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other