“Care Closer to Home”: the Torquay experience (not good)

Concerns that care in the community is failing some Torbay and South Devon residents have been raised by a health campaign body.

Gordon Jennings, chairman of the Community Health and Welfare Alliance, set up at the time of the consultation on the closures of community hospitals in Torbay and South Devon, said they feared the consequences of the closure of at least 74 beds across Torbay alone. One of the main providers of care in the area Mears Care was recently taken out of special measures by Government inspectors but they still rated it as ‘requiring improvement.’

It comes after Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust marked the second anniversary of the launch of the pioneering integrated care organisation in the area.

Mr Jennings said: “We are concerned as we have a high proportion of over 80s in the population, we should be making sure there are suitable arrangements for those people. The integrated care organisation’s argument is that the alternative to community hospitals is care at home. But they haven’t got the staff for home care. How are you going to get quality of care? Changes usually mean improvement, but it’s arguable that under the Devon NHS Sustainability and Transformation Plan (STP) this is not always the case and is a series of cuts – including the loss of 100 hospital beds.

“Evidence is being gathered on experiences under ‘Care in the Home’, but we would implore Torbay communities to become involved and share your experiences with Healthwatch Torbay, Paignton Library, who are conducting ‘have your voice heard today’ consultation on this and other health subjects.

“We need to remind ourselves that South Devon and Torbay Clinical Commissioning Group admitted at the consultation meetings in regards the lack of staff in this area. With your help it is our intention, not only to seek a meeting with the CCG, with these findings, but also Torbay Council Health and Well Being Board, who have a responsibility in this area.

“We have been seeking evidence that it isn’t working and we have had some cases come forward but we are looking for more. If people can write to us with their concerns we can take it up with the right people.”

Dr Kevin Dixon, chairman of Torbay’s independent consumer champion for health and social care, Healthwatch Torbay, said: “Healthwatch Torbay regularly shares an extensive variety of local feedback from Torbay residents on hospital discharge and community care with both Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust and the Care Quality Commission, along with relevant providers and health commissioners, in order to contribute to their intelligence reports and prompt them into any relevant action.

“Although we have heard public concerns with both discharge and community care, we have also received praise for both.

“The findings of the CQC report into Mears Care Ltd. were reflected in the feedback we have gathered from those people who shared their experiences with us, which indicated that although there was some improvement in the quality of care Mears have provided since the original CQC report in 2016, a number of issues still exist.

“We remain committed to escalating any public complaints and concerns directly with Mears Care Ltd. and continue to monitor the quality of care they provide. Healthwatch Torbay will carry on gathering local public feedback and sharing it with key decision-makers to ensure the public voice is listened to at a commissioning level.”

Michael Rennolds of Coombe Road, Preston, has muscular dystrophy and Muscular Dystrophy UK say the condition is a progressive and life limiting muscular wasting condition for which there is no cure and no effective treatment. That means he has high needs.

Joel Rackham, care and information advocacy officer has written to Torbay and South Devon Healthcare Trust saying Michael required constant individualised care and intervention over each 24- hour period including regular physiotherapy, support with food and drink, toileting and bathing needs.

They say it is critical an up-to-date care plan is in place. But they say he has lost out on several respite days as well as his care hours were reduced from 84 hours a week to 41 which the charity say is ‘insufficient to meet his care needs’ .

At the same time £16,200 was taken out of his bank account which would have been used to pay for care. The charity has asked for the money to be reinstated and say it is ‘not fair’ to expect his mother, who works part time to be expected to care for him as her health is being affected and she cannot be expected to handle Mr Rennolds on her own.

The charity has asked for a minimum of 98 hours of care per week, more than double the amount budgeted for.

Nic Bungay, director of Campaigns, Care and Information at Muscular Dystrophy UK told Devon Live: “Without the right support in place, the difficult job of helping Michael to get out of bed, get dressed, eat his meals and live his life will fall on his mother Susan. The severe and progressive nature of Duchenne muscular dystrophy means that any reduction in care is wrong, but cutting the hours in half and leaving an entire day without any provision is unthinkable. His hours need to rise to the recommended 98 hours a week immediately.”

Mrs Rennolds said the money has still not been reinstated and she had been told the consideration of her complaint had again been adjourned.

“The NHS have taken the £16,200 out of Michael’s bank account, because he wouldn’t sign some papers that were in dispute. Only an idiot would sign some papers they disputed. The charity has written stating that money has to be put back. Michael is really down about this.”

A Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust spokesman, said: “We are currently in the process of responding directly to Mr Rennolds’ complaint. “We are fully committed to providing our clients with the best possible care. We work hard to ensure that people stay as healthy and independent as possible and that those who would be at risk of injury, illness or isolation are cared for as a priority. Each client will have their individual needs professionally assessed on a regular basis and our health and care professionals will work with them to identify the best way for their needs to be met. This means we can be sure we continue to meet individual’s changing needs.

“Whilst we cannot discuss individual client cases, when clients have their needs and care plans reassessed, we always do this working in partnership with the person and jointly agree the outcome.

Direct payments are made to meet an individual’s specific care needs. In addition, as part of the national guidelines, all recipients of Direct Payments sign an agreement that states that we reserve the right to reclaim money that is not being used. If people in receipt of direct payments accumulate a significant amount of money saved from their direct payments, in line with these national guidelines, we will recover a proportion of this money which will then go towards providing care for other vulnerable people. When monies are recovered, we will always ensure a significant proportion still remains in their Direct Payment account to cover their own care costs as well as a contingency for any unexpected expenditure.”

Marilyn and Ivor Martin, of Salisbury Avenue, Torquay say they are struggling with the level of care offered at home after Ivor, 68, had a serious stroke.

Marilyn said he had a stroke out of the blue one lunchtime which has left him affected all down the left side and incontinent. She said: “I cannot fault the hospital staff at all, the ambulance staff they were incredible. He was moved to Newton Abbot and his care there was wonderful, impeccable. Then I had a visit from occupational therapy from Newton Abbot who said he was coming home. I said my house isn’t suitable.

“I have steps in my garden, I was told there was no money to do that. I have a corner bath and they said there were no aids to get him in and out of the bath so he would have to strip wash and he would need to for the rest of his life if needs be. If I wanted adaptations I would have to pay for it myself. I was offered handrails which would take six to eight weeks to install after he got home. He couldn’t get upstairs and I said I was not having him home if it was not safe. They said I would have to put a bed in the dining room. I don’t have a single bed but was told I would have to buy or borrow one. They put a rail on my bed upstairs, a commode, a rail around the toilet so he could get himself up.

“I was told if I don’t have him home he would have to go in a care home. That would cost hundreds of pounds, money which should be put into caring for people in the community. We had him home and within three days he had a hospital appointment at 12noon. I was told there would be transport but it would come at anytime between 9.30am and 11.30am, and they would pick him up any time between 1pm and 4pm. He’s incontinent, he would be sat at the hospital all that time without food. I was told ‘that’s the way it is’. We had three appointments in one week for the heart and lung department, but they said they couldn’t arrange for them all on one day so we had to get him up there three times. I took him up with my son’s girlfriend who helped, but I am lifting him in and out the car and I had open heart surgery last year. There is no thought about the carers.

“They said that while I was at work, there could be someone coming in the morning to dress him and someone to give him a sandwich at lunchtime. They said they could come any time between 7.30pm to 10.30am. He wouldn’t stay in bed that late, he’d be getting himself up and falling. I can’t have that. Then they could be back at 11am and 2pm getting him lunch. It’s ludicrous.

“I had help filling out the forms for attendance allowance but you can’t have that until they have been ill for six months. I have spent nearly £4,000 on having a ramp put in the garden and shower unit changed and putting in a second hand stairlift. The physios have been fantastic but suddenly they were told they weren’t coming again until October. His arm isn’t working at all and his hand is swollen. It’s not right. Having the physio in really boosts his morale as well. If you are going to have care in the community you have to the people to do it. Ivor could go swimming at Plainmoor Pool but there’s no way to get help taking him there, I have got to do it. If someone doesn’t have someone at home to help how do they get there?

“There needs to be an organisation that sets up a package and says you will need this, this and this and get it organised for you. In hospital they were fantastic every single nurse and doctor, but if you are going to do care in the community you need to set up what people need before you throw them out there. Nobody is helping us. “

Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, the integrated care organisation responsible for social care in Torbay, said they could not comment as they had not had a direct complaint from the Martins. On the question of a shortage of carers a trust spokesman said: “We recognise that, like other places in the country, having enough people with the right skills and training to provide domiciliary care for people to be able to continue to be supported at home is a challenge. And there are a number of things we are doing to ensure the right level of care can be provided including supporting the campaign ‘Loving to Care’ to encourage more people to enter this very rewarding career.

A key part of how we are addressing the challenge is our partnership with a national provider of domiciliary care, Mears, This partnership helps to ensure enough carers are recruited, trained and supported to develop their skills. We extend our training and support so that carers working for all care providers are able to benefit from our training provision. This is an incredibly worthwhile profession and by supporting providers to be able to offer increased opportunities for development of their staff they are not only gaining important skills they also benefit from greater job satisfaction and are more likely to want stay in the caring profession.

“In addition to this support we also offer alternatives for people , such as direct payments which enables people to employ their own support assistant directly.”

Torbay residents can share their experiences by calling Healthwatch free on 08000 520 029, visiting upstairs at Paignton library, or even by rating and reviewing a local health and social care service online via http://www.healthwatchtorbay.org.uk. If you have a case write to Mr G Jennings, c/o Acorn Centre, Lummaton Cross, Torquay, TQ2 8ET.”

http://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/south-devons-pioneering-care-community-708511

NHS: where the money goes – short-term fixes

“The NHS spent almost £100 million on stand-in midwives last year, with the figure for England 20 per cent higher than in the year before.

Jon Skewes, director of policy at the Royal College of Midwives, said that the money could have paid for 4,391 newly qualified midwives or 2,731 more experienced staff.

Years of pay freezes were blamed for driving NHS midwives away, adding to pressure on Philip Hammond, the chancellor, to promise health workers a pay rise in next month’s budget.

The NHS spent £2.9 billion on private agency workers in 2016-17, down from £3.6 billion the year before after pay caps were imposed on nurses, doctors and midwives. Much of the fall was due to the NHS switching from external agencies to in-house “staff banks”, where workers are called in as required.

Data collected by the Royal College of Midwives found that private agency spending in English maternity units fell from £29 million in 2015 to £20.6 million last year. NHS bank staff costs rose from £43.2 million to £58.6 million.

Once overtime is included, spending rose from £72.7 million in 2015 to £87.3 million in 2016. For the first time, the college gathered comparable data from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, finding that overall the NHS spent £97.1 million on maternity gaps.

Mr Skewes said: “The use of temporary midwives to staff permanent shortages is counterproductive and smacks of short-termism . . . It is costing more in the long run to pay agency, bank and overtime than it would if services employed the right numbers of midwives.” He added that the “average midwife has seen their salary decrease in value by over £6,000 since 2010”.

•Charities such as Macmillan Cancer Support, the Alzheimer’s Society and Age UK joined health bosses and senior doctors to issue a “cry for help” for more money. “Without additional resources there will be a further deterioration in what can be provided for patients, service users and carers”, says a letter also signed by Carrie MacEwen, chairwoman of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, a group for the professional standards bodies that usually stay out of politics.”

Times (pay wall)

“Campaigners put pressure on government to improve ‘dire’ Devon education funding at national lobby”

As yet there appears to be no similar East Devon campaign group and our two MPs simply dole out meaningless platitudes without concrete follow-up action. Swire seems more preoccupied with who to back for next PM (or maybe ex-PM!) in order to regain a foreign office ministerial post while Parish’s preoccupations remain farmers and dualling the A303.

… “Tamsin Higgs, mother-of-three from Braunton, has been leading the parent-led and non-political Fair Funding For All Schools campaign in North Devon since the beginning of this year. For more information you can visit the campaign’s Facebook page here. Tamsin has also set up a campaign group in Torrington who recently met with Torridge MP Geoffrey Cox. …

… Tamsin said she regularly meets with the central school funding campaign group in London who, alongside the National Education Union, planned the national lobby at Westminster against school funding cuts. The group decided to take part in the lobby, which attracted more than 1,000 people, to apply pressure from all constituencies on the central government to increase funding and ensure schools are not losing out. …”

http://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/campaigners-put-pressure-government-improve-700472

Foreign companies pay no corporation tax on UK commercial property sales

“… According to the British Property Federation there is about £871bn worth of commercial real estate in the UK – 10% of our nation’s net wealth. Not only is this hugely important in its own right, its value impacts on the price of land, and hence of new homes. About 20% of commercial real estate is sold each year – worth an eye-watering £115bn in 2015, according to Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.

When a seller is a UK individual or company, they are subject to UK corporation tax on their capital gains. Yet where the seller is foreign they are not. Approximately one-third of all UK commercial real estate – including most high value property – is held through offshore companies. Typically these companies are in tax havens, or structured so they pay no tax on the capital gain. Indeed, British taxpayers should be asking tough questions as to why their government turns a blind eye to anyone who holds UK property in offshore companies. …

In 2015 the then chancellor George Osborne made a big deal of taking action against non-doms who avoided paying tax – ending permanent non-dom status and changing the rules on inheritance tax. He also introduced capital gains tax on residential property sales by non-doms – but crucially not commercial properties. This has created the world’s most obvious loophole where overseas individuals and companies can repurpose property as commercial to avoid it. Closing this loophole could be very lucrative – estimates suggest it would raise between £5bn and £8bn per year.

Those worried that this would put Britain itself at a disadvantage against our competitors can be reassured: the United States taxes foreigners making a capital gain on US real estate, as do Spain, France, Germany, Italy, Canada and Australia. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development rules explicitly allow nations to tax foreign-owned companies on the sale of their real estate. Yet successive UK governments have quietly let this injustice continue.

Last week I [Stella Creasey, Labour MP] tabled legislation to try to tackle this – but the government didn’t want to know. Treasury minister Mel Stride simply said it would be too “complex” to implement. With such sums at stake, our public services cannot afford for us to leave this in the “complicated” box any longer: the dividends could make a real contribution to our cash-starved schools and hospitals. In addition, it would improve the fairness of our tax system and help take some of the heat out of the UK’s inflamed property market.

We have another opportunity this coming week to finish what Osborne started. Parliament can act by supporting my amendment to the finance bill at its report stage on Tuesday 31 October. With cross-party support already building for it, this Halloween it’s time to give those overseas companies not paying their taxes a real nightmare.”

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/30/egregious-loophole-property-capital-gains-tax-close-foreign-owners-commercial

Is a new, powerful supra-regional authority being created without public consultation?

Owl says: yes!

On 1 January 2018, a new “Joint Committee” will come into being.

It is charged with delivery of a “productivity strategy” for the whole Devon and Somerset area.

For its (sinister?) aims and objectives, see section 1.3 here:

Click to access 011117bpcabinethotsw%20jcarrangementsappendixc.pdf

Truly, we live in disturbing times as NONE of this has had ANY public consultation, yet, at EDDC, it will be decided on the nod at its Cabinet meeting on 1 November 2017:

Click to access 011117combinedcabinetagenda.pdf

Some really worrying points:

In Section 2.2 it says that the joint committee can at any time extend its powers as it sees fit.

Section 9.2 says a simple majority of votes will decide actions [the membership will be overwhelmingly Tory]

Section 12.0 Chief Executives and Monitoring Officers will be able to add items to the agenda.

NO DOCUMENT PUT FORWARD HAS ANY MENTION OF SCRUTINY OR TRANSPARENCY

The new “joint authority” authority consists of:

[MEMBERS]

Dartmoor National Park Authority
Devon County Council
East Devon District Council
Exeter City Council
Exmoor National Park Authority
Mendip District Council
Mid Devon District Council
North Devon Council
Plymouth City Council
Sedgemoor District Council
Somerset County Council
South Hams District Council
South Somerset Council
Torbay Council
Taunton Deane Borough Council
Teignbridge District Council
Torridge District Council
West Devon Borough Council
West Somerset Council

PLUS CO-OPTED NON-VOTING MEMBERS:

Heart of the South West Local Enterprise Partnership
NHS Northern, Eastern and Western Devon Clinical Commissioning Group
NHS South Devon and Torbay Clinical Commissioning Group
NHS Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group

AND ANY OTHER CO-OPTED MEMBERS THAT THE JOINT COMMISSIONING GROUP DECIDES TO INVITE

“PFI: five firms avoid tax despite £2bn profits, BBC learns”

“Five offshore PFI companies paid little or no corporation tax during a five-year period despite making profits of nearly £2bn, the BBC has learned.
The five companies specialised in lending money through Private Finance Initiatives (PFI).

They own hundreds of public assets including schools, hospitals and even police stations.

The BBC has also learned that a small number of big offshore companies are currently on a buying spree.

They are buying up a number of the UK’s public buildings.

Research carried out by the think tank that investigates PFI deals, the European Services Strategy Unit, reveals the extent of the buy-up in Britain.

Nine off-shore infrastructure funds own between 50% and 100% of the equity in 335 PFI/Public Private Partnership (PPP) projects. This amounts to 45% of all 735 current projects

12 offshore companies have bought equity in 74% of the 735 current projects
Education and health projects, including schools and hospitals, account for two-thirds of the purchases by offshore companies…

… Dexter Whitfield heads the European Services Strategy Unit which carried out the PFI research for public bodies and other organisations.

He said offshore companies were making huge profits from buying public assets, with annual average returns on their PFI investments as high as 28%.
But Mr Whitfield said the companies paid little or no UK corporation tax despite making huge profits.

He said: “PFI is essentially a private sector profit machine. If the government adopted a strategy of building the public infrastructure directly through public investment and operating it through their in-house services this whole edifice would not exist.

“All these transactions are a product of the fact that there is so much money to be made in PFI.”

Mr Whitfield said five offshore PFI funds made profits of £1.83bn over the five-year period ending in April 2015, but paid little or no corporation tax.

However, this was disputed by one offshore PFI giant, HICL Infrastructure Ltd, based in Guernsey.

It said Mr Whitfield’s research took no account of the fact that tax was paid both by the company’s subsidiaries and by shareholders on their dividends.

A spokesman said: “At the project level, HICL invests in a number of companies, which are incorporated in the UK and accordingly taxed by HMRC….”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-41778609

Referrals by councils to Secretary of State increase – but not in Devon where local Tories said it wasn’t worth doing

“2017 is shaping up to be a bumper year for NHS service change proposals in England being referred to the Secretary of State for Health by local politicians. And that means a bumper year for initial assessments by IRP, the independent body that advises the Secretary of State. [This is what would have happened – mandatory independent scrutiny – if the DCC adult care scrutiny committee had not had a block Tory vote to refuse it – spurred on by Diviani ignoring the wishes of his own council and some very dubious chairing by Sarah Randall-Johnson. What were DCC Tories afraid of, Owl wonders?

We saw just two initial assessment letters in 2016. The assessment letter IRP published on 18 October responding to concerns raised by Thurrock Council about the location for a specialist scanner, is the fifth IRP has published this year and we’re waiting for more to progress through the system.

Local councillors are uniquely placed to understand public sensitivities around changes to local health services, so it’s no surprise that NHS legislation gives them a crucial role in overseeing health service change programmes. The role is important and the legislation sets out responsibilities for NHS and council leaders to make sure the process is effective.

The IRP’s assessment of the Thurrock referral is a timely reminder of the requirement for councils to formally join together to scrutinise proposals that affect more than one local authority area. In this case it seems Thurrock councillors declined to take part in a joint scrutiny committee and instead dealt with the matter on its own. The process is there for good reason and not following it risks weakening whatever good case a council has for making the referral.

The regulations allow councils to come together to form joint scrutiny committees whenever they see fit. The same regulations require councils to form a joint committee when “a relevant NHS body or health service provider consults more than one local authority’s health scrutiny function about substantial reconfiguration proposals”. The rules mean where a section 30 ‘mandatory joint health scrutiny committee’ is in place, only the mandatory committee is allowed to respond to the consultation; exercise the power to require information about the proposals to be provided to it; and require people from the relevant body to appear before it to answer questions relevant to the proposals.

The power to make referrals to the Secretary of State for Health is different. Councils can choose to delegate that to a mandatory joint scrutiny committee, or retain it. So the rules would have allowed Thurrock to participate in the mandatory committee and still consider the matter of referral alone. Would it have strengthened their case to have done that? It’s hard to envisage that following the required process would have weakened it.”

https://www.consultationinstitute.org/focus-health-scrutiny-irp-essex-cancer-scanner-review/

“More than £10 billion” spent on “sticking plaster solutions” to public service cuts

“More than £10bn of taxpayers’ money is being wasted because the government continues to ignore emerging warning signs on key public services, allowing pressures to build—and then diverting emergency cash to the frontline when a crisis emerges.

This wasteful cycle is highlighted in new analysis from the Institute for Government and the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA), published on 19 October. Worryingly, Performance Tracker, our data-driven analysis of nine public services – across health, education, law and order, neighbourhood services and immigration – finds that this emergency cash isn’t being used to solve the underlying issues in these services, but is simply keeping them going in their current state. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-network/2017/oct/19/government-wastes-10bn-patching-up-public-services-prisons-nhs-schools

Tory DCC Councillor and Cabinet member for adult social care and health services) attends commercial enterprise event

A company looking for new home care assistants (which Owl will not name) is pulling a publicity stunt to attract both new carers and new clients. DCC and other councils (and Archant Newspapers) are said to be giving their support to such initiatives, saying that:

“The vacancy rate is estimated at 6.9 per cent with some 9,000 adult social care vacancies across the region at any one time.

And across the South West an estimated 30,000 new care jobs will be needed by 2025. …”.

The care company has arranged a Q and A meeting with local health care big wigs – including an influential Tory DCC councillor – and is publicising it via a press release (no doubt related word for word by Archant) in local Archant newspapers (coincidentally Archant being a large provider of advertisements for such jobs).

What puzzles Owl is why the DCC Tory councillor is enthusiastic to be associated with such a commercial publicity stunt when local people find it almost impossible to get him and other Tory councillors to speak about social care anywhere else? Even in DCC meetings!

You know who we mean – Councillor Andrew Leadbetter (DCC), Cabinet member for adult social care and health services.

“[A local home care company] is asking people for their views on ageing, their perception of what care means and the questions that ‘up until now they’ve been reluctant to ask’.

The home care provider has launched its (details) campaign, with pop-up events around Exeter this month, as well as on Facebook and Twitter.

On Wednesday, November 8, the top 10 questions will be put to an expert care panel, including:

Martyn Rogers (Age UK, Exeter),
Cllr Andrew Leadbetter (Devon County Council Cabinet member for adult social care and health services),
Dr Michael Dixon (GP, mid-Devon) and
William Flint [the care provider] …

… Devon County Council (DCC) and 15 other councils from across the region are also hoping to boost recruitment in the care sector with its Proud to Care campaign.”

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/trio-of-campaigns-in-east-devon-will-kick-start-vital-conversations-about-care-1-5251282

The event is said to be on 8 November, but no venue is specified – you have to contact the home care company for more details.

“Lack of choice means families have to settle for poor care homes”

“Families are being forced to leave their loved ones in inadequate care homes, a consumer group has warned.

‘Systemic failures’ mean half of those needing care have to wait for a bed while choice is limited for many, the Which? survey found.

Some 48 per cent of those who arranged care for themselves or a loved one said there had been no places in one or more of the local homes they considered.

The lack of places meant many families – 17 per cent – were forced to move loved ones into care homes they had reservations about. And 16 per cent had to opt for a home away from friends and family. When they did find a bed, as many as 25 per cent said they were left feeling guilty or annoyed that they could not find a more suitable place.

The survey again highlights the extent of the crisis facing the broken care system. Those who go into a care home have to use their assets to pay the full costs of care until they are reduced to their last £23,250. …”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5022515/Lack-choice-means-families-settle-poor-care-homes.html

The scale of the social care crisis

NHS Digital figures reveal councils spent £17.5 billion on social care last year but the LGA warns services face a £2.3 billion funding gap by 2020.

The Adult Social Care Activity and Finance Report showed councils received 1.8 million requests for support last year.

Cllr Linda Thomas, Vice Chair of the LGA’s Community Wellbeing Board, said:

“These figures show councils are doing all they can to protect adult social care services. But the increase in demand and cost of services is adding to the huge pressure they are already under to support older and disabled people – keeping them at home living independently in the community.”

Source: Daily Express p9

“HS2 CFO resigns after report on ‘over-generous redundancy scheme’ “

“High Speed Rail 2’s chief financial officer has resigned after a report raised questions of unapproved redundancy payouts.

In July, The National Audit Office found HS2 had ignored orders from the Department for Transport and wasted £1.76m of public money on an ‘excessively generous’ redundancy scheme.

Steve Allen, the chief financial officer of HS2, will leave the company at the end of the financial year, HS2 announced on Tuesday.

Allen said in a statement: “The weaknesses highlighted by the NAO report resulted in both the HS2 executive and board being misinformed about the status of critical approvals for redundancies.

“Those assurances were given by teams for which I was responsible and, obviously, I regret that.”

HS2’s chief executive Mark Thurston said he respected Allen’s decision that it was the “right time for him to move on”.

He said the CFO had been “absolutely critical in identifying the ways to rectify” isssues with administrative controls and mechanisms on redundancies agreed by the company.

But, he added, Allen had now done that and allowed him to “build the executive team for the next phase of the project” with his “honourable decision”.

The NAO report found the company has made redundancy commitments of £2.76m, of which an estimated £1.76m comprised unapproved enhancements.

The report said the actions showed “an example of ineffective communication both between the company and the department, and within the company.

“Whilst deriving from a single redundancy scheme, these findings highlight the need for improvements in the company’s general control environment, where the company has itself acknowledged areas of weakness.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2017/10/hs2-cfo-resigns-after-report-over-generous-redundancy-scheme

“Get paid £1,000 a month to care for NHS patients in your spare room in drastic bid to tackle bed-blocking crisis”

No, it isn’t a sick joke – it’s in all mainstream newspapers:

Guardian:

“…The financial model is still to be finalised. Thirkettle said rooms would be rented out to funders at about £100 a night, with half going to the host. The rest would be used to pay for the care services required and a margin kept by the company as profit. He said the assumption was that it would be jointly funded by the NHS and councils. “We may also look to take self-funding patients who pay us directly.” For patients who are prepared to pay the option would be presented by a hospital’s discharge team alongside existing options such as nursing homes, he said.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/oct/25/nhs-to-pilot-airbnb-type-scheme-for-patients-recovering-from-surgery

Daily Mirror:

“… Campaigners and clinicians argue that lodging frail and vulnerable patients with members of the public in return for cash is ripe for abuse. …”

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paid-1000-month-care-nhs-11409267

Telegraph:

“… In return for fees of up to £1,000 a month, hosts are asked to ‘welcome the patient, cook three microwave meals a day, and offer conversation,’ the Health Service Journal (HSJ) has discovered. …”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/25/homeowners-offered-1000-host-nhs-patients-spare-rooms-airbnb/

“People want higher taxes for increased public spending, says poll”

“Nearly two-thirds of the public say government spending should increase even if that means higher taxes as support for austerity fades, according to research.

These are among the findings of a survey in Deloitte’s annual The State of the State report, which looked at changing attitudes to public spending.

The study, compiled by Ipsos Mori, found 63% of those surveyed were in favour of increasing government spending on public services, even if that means increases to some taxes.

This has risen from 59% in the same survey last year.

Rebecca George, lead public sector partner at Deloitte, said: “The chancellor was right to warn that people are growing weary of the long slog of austerity.

“This data shows people less convinced of the need to bring down public spending and increasingly seeing the effects of cuts in their everyday lives.” …”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2017/10/people-want-higher-taxes-increased-government-spending-says-poll

That extra £50bn promised by Javid for housing? Forget it, says Hammond

“Hammond has dismissed suggestions that it is now government policy to borrow £50bn to invest in housing. Sajid Javid, the communities secretary, has suggested borrowing more to invest in housing, with some reports claiming that Javid has been pushing the Treasury for an investment of £50bn.

But when Sir Vince Cable, the Lib Dem leader, told Hammond at Treasury questions that he was glad to see the government has agreed to increase borrowing by £50bn, Hammond said this was not government policy. He went on:

That was not what [Javid] said, as he knows. I would, however, agree with him that increasing activity in the construction sector is a very good way of creating jobs.”

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2017/oct/24/barnier-dashes-mays-hopes-of-reaching-quick-deal-on-uk-eu-trade-after-brexit-politics-live

“Counties face £2.54bn black hole”; government says it will “listen” (duh!)

“The funding black hole for county authorities will treble to £2.54bn in just four years’ time, according to the County Councils Network (CCN).

In an analysis prepared for the network’s autumn budget submission, it found that each county on average will face an additional average funding gap of £70m by 2021, on top of planned service reductions.

Social care accounts for £26m of this per authority, and £22m in implementing the new national living wage. Paul Carter, CCN chairman, said: “We are reaching a point where we are have to consider difficult, painful and unpopular decisions next year to deliver balanced budgets, which will reduce and remove frontline services highly valued by our residents. The government has said it is in listening mode, and I and my fellow county leaders, will be asking ministers across government that we need additional help and support in this budget or we will all face some very severe consequences in the future. The situation can’t go on.”

http://www.room151.co.uk/151-news/news-roundup-newhams-loan-rate-revealed-black-hole-in-county-finances-islingtons-property-company/

“Three Quarters Of Tory Councillors Worried About Cuts To Children’s Centres, Poll Reveals”

Owl says: Yet it is their party and their votes that have caused this situation.

“Nearly three quarters of Conservative councillors are worried about government funding cuts to children’s centres, a new poll has revealed.

The research, which saw 508 Tory local government representatives quizzed by charity Action for Children, showed 72% believe long-term funding for children’s services is a major concern for their council.

More than half say budget restrictions are making it harder for councils to meet their responsibilities towards children and young people, while 38% believe there is a “lack of clear direction and funding” from government.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/three-quarters-of-tory-councillors-worried-about-cuts-to-childrens-centres-poll-reveals_uk_59ecabb8e4b0958c4682b7a2

Update on “Stop the new plans to dismantle our NHS” petition

“Thank you for signing the petition STOP the new plans to dismantle our NHS. Please share.

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/stop-the-plans-to-dismantle-our-nhs

It is becoming clear that the mandated cuts of £22bn over 5 years the 44 STPs were supposedly ‘planned’ to fix, are not going to be possible in spite of some Hospital Trusts and CCGs doing what they said they would do to ‘deliver’ the NHS England mandated harsh, control totals.

Why are we not surprised?

The NHS Constitution has been broken in Hertfordshire where the CCG has decided to stop elective operations indefinitely for people who smoke and those with a BMI of 30 and above, in spite of fierce opposition from the Royal College of Surgeons and decidedly NOT the answer.

The obscene cost of a ‘market structure’ at the heart of the NHS is ignored in all this, obscured as many new MPs find out on entering Parliament and asking the question, by the fact that not one NHS body has the mandate to collect the information. This must be policy!

Academics estimate 12 to 30% NHS budget goes on transactions costs of the market, the high costs of PFI and prices of drugs and technologies (which rise ahead of NHS pay) in addition to the costs of management consultants. All this and not a patient treated. This must also be policy.

GPs and CCGs are not open about whether you are referred for treatment to an NHS or non-NHS organisation, ie for-profit, Community Interest Company or charity.

These plans are a smokescreen for further privatisation and finance industry involvement in the NHS.

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/stop-the-plans-to-dismantle-our-nhs

Please share.

Thanks for staying with us! We appreciate it greatly. With your help we CAN win this!”

Academy school group allegedly strips its assets before transfer

“Wakefield City Academies Trust now stands accused of “asset stripping” after it transferred millions of pounds of the schools’ savings to its own accounts before collapsing. On 8 September it released a statement announcing it would divest itself of its 21 schools as it could not undertake the “rapid improvement our academies need”. It said that new sponsors would be found to take them over.

… Hemsworth Arts and Community Academy, a mixed secondary school in Pontefract, had £220,000 of funds, raised by volunteers at Christmas markets and other school events, transferred to the trust’s accounts earlier this year. It also saw a further £216,000, which had been held back for capital investment, moved over. “It’s not the trust’s money. It’s our money,” said a former governor at the school, who did not want to be named. “It’s money for the people in the area, their children and their grandchildren. It wasn’t for them to take.”

Heath View primary school in Wakefield had £300,000 transferred to the trust in September 2016. Another school, Wakefield City Academy, had more than £800,000 transferred towards the end of 2015. In both cases the trust told the schools’ governors that the transfer was a loan. Wakefield City Academy even received a number of small repayments. However, since the trust’s collapse both schools have been told that it no longer acknowledges the transactions as loans.

For Wakefield City Academy, the money had been held back to provide a financial cushion for when a particularly large cohort of children – born during the early 2000s baby boom – arrive in the secondary school system. “This money was our rainy day money,” said Kevin Swift, chair of the school’s local governing body. “It wasn’t just left under the mattress. It was money that we had anticipated we would have a very definite need for.”

High Crags Academy primary school in Shipley was instructed by the DfE to join the trust in April 2016 after being put into special measures the previous year. When it joined it had a surplus of £178,000, which was immediately moved to centralised accounts….

… Parents, teachers and governors say the financial problems at the Wakefield City Academies Trust had been clear for nearly a year before it collapsed. In November 2016 a draft DfE report leaked to the Times Education Supplement stated that the trust was in an “extremely vulnerable position as a result of inadequate governance, leadership and overall financial management”.

The draft raised concerns that the chief executive, Mike Ramsay, had been paid more than £82,000 for 15 weeks’ work, despite the fact that the trust was facing a large budget deficit. The DfE has so far refused freedom of information requests to see the final report.

The previous month, it had emerged that the trust had paid almost £440,000 to IT and clerking companies owned by Ramsay and his daughter. In a statement at the time, the trust said internal vetting procedures had found that the contracts represented the best value.

Although serious questions have been raised about financial managment, there is no suggestion of fraudulent activity….

While a spokesman for the Wakefield City Academies Trust declined to comment, the DfE said a failing academy trust could never profit from the transfer of its schools to new sponsors. A spokesman said: “We are working with the trust to ensure that there is minimal disruption for pupils.

“We are also working with the preferred trusts and schools to ensure they have the right support and resources they need to improve the outcomes for pupils as quickly as possible, which will include the necessary pupil funding.” … “

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/oct/21/collapsing-wakefield-city-academies-trust-asset-stripped-schools-millions-say-furious-parents