“Regeneration plans and meetings” – are they worth the effort

A correspondent writes:

“For years Exmouth and Seaton have had regeneration areas and Regeneration Boards. Until recently, all the Regeneration Board meetings were secret – now they are published but often with redacted parts.

But are these meetings, Boards, plans, consultations worth the bother?

Seaton’s regeneration area began life with a relatively small supermarket, housing, community and leisure facilities and a hotel, with 40% affordable housing in a total of over 400 houses. What they got was an enormous Tesco, less than 300 houses and no affordable homes.

Exmouth is now going the same way: it started as a purely seafront-themed “upgrading” but changed into expensive housing and cloned businesses.

So, we must ask ourselves: what were all these plans, meetings and consultations actually FOR? What we are ending up with on both sites is nothing like what was initially planned, or discussed or consulted on.

Regeneration Boards are top-heavy with the developers on each site, who appear to use them to push forward their plans, unchallenged either by councillors or officers – in fact, the total opposite, leaving said officers and councillors to ram through their development agendas.

Surely, this makes a total mockery of our officers, councillors and Regeneration Boards but, more importantly, the electors of East Devon, who were sold pups – coincidentally just before two major district elections.

An excellent bit of research by EDA councillor on beach huts

Puts officer “research” and Asset Management Forum total lack of research to shame:

http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/news/20150930/beach-huts-research/

Well done Councillor Marianne Rixon.

Councillors should not be concerning themselves with Asset Management, says officer

“Donna Best, Principal Estates Surveyor explained the reason behind the Asset Management Forum (AMF) and that most Local Asset Management Forums only consisted of officers and had little if any Councillor representation”

Click to access 030915-amf.pdf

ITS BEEN MEETING WITH OFFICERS AND COUNCILLORS SINCE 2009, AND MS BEST HAS ATTENDED SINCE THEN!

Has it taken her six years to come up with this and an explanation of what she thinks the Asset Management Forum is FOR? And why now, one wonders? Too much of a spotlight on it and a wish to go back to the shadows perhaps – no councillors means no agendas or minutes ..,

EDDC forced to publish formerly secret Asset Management Group agendas and minutes

Re-posted from
eastdevonalliance.ork.uk:

“After a lot of pressure from opposition Councillors and from Freedom of Information requests, EDDC has now published all the Agendas and Minutes of their Asset Management Forum. There are some redactions.

The documents can be found here:

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/committees-and-meetings/asset-management-forum/

Just to remind you that it was at these meetings that the development of Exmouth seafront was discussed and also the proposals for beach huts were developed.”

The risks of outsourcing risks

Internal auditors urge public sector boards to get assurance on risks of outsourcing

Public sector boards should not approve strategically important outsourcing projects “without first getting full assurance from their internal audit teams that the potential risks have been properly considered and effective controls are in place”, the Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors has said.

In a report the Institute warned that failure to foresee and manage outsourcing risks could result in service failures, delays in the implementation of new projects, significant additional costs and reputational damage.

Such outcomes could undermine the cost savings and other benefits that outsourcing is intended to deliver, it added.
The Institute also argued that getting outsourcing right was increasingly important as it becomes more widespread among organisations seeking to cut costs and increase efficiency by buying-in specialist services.

It predicted that the increase in outsourcing by the public sector between 2010 and 2014 would continue with the pressure on public spending.

Dr Ian Peters, chief executive of the Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors, said: “Outsourcing the service does not outsource the risk. Organisations may think they have thrown the risk ‘over the fence’ but this is absolutely not the case.

“Internal audit can support boards in relation to outsourced services. There should be an appetite at board and senior management level for assurance that the risks of outsourcing are being managed so that the organisation’s achievement of its strategic objectives is not compromised.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24548:internal-auditors-urge-public-sector-boards-to-get-assurance-on-risks-of-outsourcing&catid=53&Itemid=21

The cloning of Exmouth seafront begins

Many would say that the Carriage Cafe is the sort of thing many re-invented seafronts would compete for. and indeed Lappa Valley in Cornwall, to which it will locate, agrees.

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Pictures-End-era-Exmouth-seafront-8217-s-Carriage/story-27889925-detail/story.html

“Corruption is rife in the EU” – and in our own back yard

Following the jailing of a corrupt Exeter City Council housing section employee for a scam that netted him nearly half a million pounds:

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Senior-Exeter-council-boss-masterminded/story-27868580-detail/story.html

here is a report on how this takes place all over Europe – is enough being done to ensure this is not happening even close than Exeter City Council?:

“By Dean Carroll

Citizen trust in governments and public bodies is desperately low because relationships between politicians and business leaders “take place in the dark”, according to campaign group Transparency International. Reacting to the European Commission’s first ever continent-wide anti-corruption report, which had identified serious shortcomings in the efforts of European Union member states, TI suggested that “no country gets a clean bill of health”.

Deputy managing director of Transparency International Miklos Marschall said: “Trust in Europe’s leaders is falling because relations between business and the public sector take place in the dark, leaving citizens with questions about whose interests are being taken care of. To bridge the gap between politics and people, there must be greater transparency in public life and more public officials held to account for their actions.”

Cross-border corruption was highlighted as a threat to the single market in the report assessing all 28 EU member states. It was estimated that corruption was costing the public purse at least €120bn a year. The document was first scheduled for publication in June of last year but has since been hit by one delay after another. It paints a bleak picture of public sector administration with potential conflicts of interest leading to possible systemic skullduggery in areas including the awarding of public contracts, bribery, parliamentary ethics and political party financing.

“We welcome this report as an important step in the EU’s collective effort to scale up its anti-corruption efforts,” said Marschall. “It is a stark warning against complacency about corruption in any EU country.”

In 2013, France, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Spain all experienced well-documented cases of high-level criminal allegations ranging from fraud and money-laundering to abuses of party finances. Sweden, however, was celebrated as the best performer in the report. But European Commisisoner for Home Affairs Cecilia Malmström admitted: “Corruption is a phenomenon which is difficult to tackle. At the same time, it is a problem we cannot afford to ignore. One in 12 Europeans has experienced or witnessed corruption in the last 12 months and four out of 10 European companies consider corruption to be an obstacle for doing business within the EU.

“The level of corruption varies from one member state to another. But the report also shows that corruption affects all EU member states. One thing is very clear: there is no corruption-free zone in Europe. We hope that the process we are starting today will spur the political will and the necessary commitment at all levels to address corruption more effectively across Europe. The price of not acting is simply too high.”

In Croatia, the Czech Republic, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania and Greece between 6 per cent and 29 per cent of respondents surveyed by the commission said they had been asked for a bribe in the last 12 months. A large volume of bribes also occurred in Poland, Slovakia and Hungary – according to the official statistics.

Despite the discovery that maladministration was rife, the EU’s anti-fraud agency OLAF retained an annual budget of just €23.5m. Europol has estimated that 3,000 organised crime groups also have tentacles spreading across a number of areas – possibly even within public authorities. The BBC reported that Bulgaria, Romania and Italy were “particular hotspots for organised crime gangs in the EU but white-collar crimes like bribery and value added tax fraud plague many EU countries”.

http://www.policyreview.eu/corruption-blights-public-life-across-the-entire-eu/

Plymouth constructs a Science Park to compete with Exeter

Just how many Science Parks can Devon sustain?

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Work-starts-Plymouth-Science-Park-s-7m-business/story-27876967-detail/story.html

“Exmouth Splat?” – report of yesterday’s public meeting

Conservative-led East Devon District Council (EDDC) was branded as undemocratic, secretive and devious at a packed meeting in Exmouth yesterday.

Campaign group Save Exmouth Seafront (SES) called the public meeting in the town’s All Saints Church Hall to fight EDDC’s latest grandiose plans for the redevelopment of Queen’s Drive.

Independent Exmouth councillor Megan Armstrong, SES Acting Chair Louise MacAllister, and SES researcher Tim Todd described the background to the project, known originally as “Exmouth Splash” and a lively, sometimes angry, audience expressed strong opposition to it.

Interesting revelations emerged:

· It was claimed that leading EDDC councillors and officers have a clear agenda to sell Exmouth’s assets to help fill the gaping hole in their revenue caused by Government cuts [and their expensive move from Sidmouth? ed].

· The plans for Exmouth have been hatched in secret meetings where minutes are not taken, the public are excluded, and councillors sworn to secrecy.

· EDDC’s “extensive” consultation is a sham – based on 518 replies to a 2011 publication, and comments from 14 pupils at Exmouth College!

· SES’ own recent survey confirms strong support for keeping the traditional charm of Exmouth seafront and the popular local businesses established there for many years.

· These modest local businesses have been “sabotaged” by EDDC with 12-month leases making investment and expansion difficult so they can be replaced by big outside speculative developers.

· Extensive residential and retail development including a cinema and expensive “attractions” will reduce children’s play areas from over 14000 square metres to about 3000.

· A new Water Sports Centre is planned at the most dangerous point of the beach, and entails a diversion of Queen’s Drive costing one and a half million pounds.

The meeting ended with the SES desks swamped by volunteers eager to help the campaign to reclaim the future of their town from bureaucrats and speculators who have no respect for what makes a place unique, special and loved.

Sidmouth Mill Street “car park” – the latest scandal

“District councillor Matt Booth, a Sidmouth town ward member, said the first he saw of the ‘bombshell’ Mill Street proposals was in the Herald – and claimed the authority showed a ‘lack of transparency’.

Mr Booth claimed: “It has a problem of transparency and accountability – and it can’t go on ignoring that.

“It does a disservice to the councillors and officers who do such fantastic work. It’s also massively disrespectful to us as ward members – we weren’t consulted.”

Cllr Booth said he and Councillor Cathy Gardner had met EDDC chief executive Mark Williams two months ago to talk about how the section 106 funding would be spent. Cllr Booth said they discussed potential affordable housing on the Manstone Depot site or in Woolbrook Road – but claimed Mill Street car park was never mentioned.

An EDDC spokeswoman said: “We would like to emphasise that this is very early days in the decision-making process and that absolutely nothing has yet been agreed.

“There will be a fully transparent and participative debate about how people would like to see this important site used to its best advantage in the tow

http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/in-the-press/20150925/sidmouth-herald-mill-street-proposal-eddc-lacks-transparency/

And follow Sidmothian conversations here:

http://futuresforumvgs.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/the-district-council-developing-mill.html

Exmouth seafront meeting today

Save Exmouth Seafront are holding a public meeting on Saturday 26th September at 2.00pm in All Saints Church Hall, Exeter Road, Exmouth EX8 1QD. This meeting will be chaired by Lympstone Councillor Ben Ingham, Leader of both the East Devon Alliance and the opposition group of Independent Councillors at EDDC.

If you are interested in what is happening to Exmouth Seafront and would like your views to be considered, please come along and show your support and think about offering them help if you possibly can.

Discussion about the campaign and more information about Save Exmouth Seafront can be found at: https://www.facebook.com/Exmouthsplash.

A press release from Save Exmouth Seafront has been reported by the Exeter Express and Echo here.

source: eastdevonalliance.org.uk

“A rose by any other name …”

Standards Committee agenda papers, in a section on lobbying of councillors:

“Points made and questions raised during discussion on the report included

The use of the word ‘developer’ should be replaced with ‘applicant’ as this was considered more appropriate – most people tended to associate the word developer with large scale developments.”

Click to access 290915standardscombinedagenda.pdf

Well, We don’t know about you but we are pretty clear on the difference: an applicant is someone who (usually) lives in the property they want to change and isn’t asking to build more properties, a developer (usually) doesn’t live in the property and includes the words ” lack of 5 year land supply” in the documentation!

The crowded diary of an East Devon councillor

Oh dear, the scent of desperation pervades East Devon District Council this week. It seems that councillors are in dire need some training (aka brainwashing?) about exactly how wonderful East Devon really is and how wonderful officers of East Devon are.

To that end, councillors are being bussed around the area, here, there and everywhere (as long as it is close to Exeter) where, no doubt, various developers and consultants will attempt to sell them snake oil. They are also being encouraged to attend meetings (or perhaps rallies?) to make them to understand just what the district is all about and to have some sympathy for the poor officers who have to deal with the snake oil salesmen on a daily basis.

Here is the crowded schedule:

30th September – all councillors requested to visit the “Growth Point” (you know, the one that doesn’t seem to be growing very much – if at all).

2nd October – all councillors again requested to join the “Exmouth and Cranbrook Countryside Service tour”, with the added perk of a free lunch AND a coach trip from Knowle!

6th October – a Development Management Committee training session open to all councillors on Highways (though lunch will be provided ONLY for committee members).

8th October – “Meet the Building Control Team” (the one having such a problem in Feniton and Cranbrook where developers are just not interested in talking to them).

9th October – WWorking together for the future of East Devon” “event”. The word “event” conjouring up to Owl the spectre of Powerpoint presentations and flip charts …

Click to access 250915-knowledge-issue-20.pdf

When do councillors get any time to WORK!

EDDC advertises for a “Development Enabling and Monitoring Officer”

Oddly, this was found in a Plymouth newspaper and not an Exeter/East Devon one! When you get towards the end when the ad describes EDDC’s “vision” be careful you don’t have anything in your mouth as you might gag or choke … And isn’t this mostly what Mr Cohen – or his Development Manager Mr Rose – have been supposed to be doing?

Here is the text of the advert – the job pays circa “£30,000 – £34,000:

About the role Exciting things are happening here in East Devon, making it a very rewarding time to work at East Devon District Council. It’s also an incredibly busy time for the Council, with not only around 18,000 new homes planned for development by 2031, but also some major regeneration projects in place in Exmouth and Seaton.

In this brand new and unique role within our Major Projects team, you’ll play an integral part in the delivery of new housing developments across the East Devon district. As the sole Development Enabling and Monitoring Officer for East Devon District Council, you’ll be at the heart of managing and monitoring the progress of all major new housing developments, particularly the Cranbrook community.

Splitting your time between the office and each development site, you’ll be a vital line of communication between the Council and developers. You’ll build strong working relationships with the developers at each site, as you conduct regular visits to ensure that new housing is progressing in line with all planning permissions and agreements. And where any issues arise, we’ll look to you to investigate and liaise with the developer and colleagues to resolve issues that are holding back the delivery of the site or are likely to cause future problems or delays.

In this impactful and highly varied role, you’ll have the chance to really shape your role within the team, and make a lasting difference to the progression of new housing across East Devon.

About you

A driven and proactive individual, you’ve a solid background in building, surveying or planning, and a degree in any of these or another related subject. Confident and capable, you’ve exceptional people skills and while not afraid to be assertive, you’re able to build successful working relationships with colleagues, stakeholders and developers.

You’ll also have a strong understanding of development viability modelling software, and a robust working knowledge of development economics and the planning system. Right now you might be working in a similar area of planning, looking to add a new, and more challenging dimension to this type of role. Fixed-term contract, two years.

About us East Devon District Council is ambitious for our district and our residents. We live in a beautiful part of the world, with much of our landscape falling into an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Nationally recognised research shows that East Devon scored top of all 325 districts in its quality of life score. Our appreciation of this quality of life runs through the culture of our council and is reflected in our ambition to keep East Devon an outstanding place to live and work.

As well as delivering great services every day, we plan carefully for a sustainable future by delivering quality jobs and good local homes for local people. Apply For further information and to apply, please visit

http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk For an informal discussion, please contact Chris Rose, Development Manager on 01395 517419, or by email to chroseeastdevon.gov.uk . Closing date: 9 th October 2015. Interview date: 23rd October 2015.

http://jobs.plymouthherald.co.uk/job/502161228/development-enabling-and-monitoring-officer/

Gypsies? Not in our backyard says Cranbrook – send ’em to Ottery!

” …The development around Cranbrook is placing considerable pressure on surrounding villages and it is felt that these villages should not be the location for any new sites.

“We note that commentary on and around the plan process seems to assume that a new traveller site will be at or near Cranbrook. We feel that this commentary is prejudicial to an objective assessment.”

Mr Randle [Cranbrook Town Clerk] suggested further exploration of the current showmen stopping site at Clyst St Mary and land at Daisymount near to the M5 corridor.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Cranbrook-says-gypsies-travellers/story-27861646-detail/story.html

A more radical way of dealing with the health of Cranbrook residents!

East Devon Watch has previously pointed out the difficulties facing residents of Cranbrook when it comes to local medical facilities, e.g. a backlog of patients still needing to register, and the need for expansion if the town is to grow to its projected population of 20,000.

EDDC seems to be adopting a more pessimistic solution however to the consequences of this lack of foresight and planning. Application 15/0045/MOUT (application received on 24 December [sic] 2014, and validated 10 March this year), calls for the construction of up to 820 houses at Cranbrook, with additional facilities such as a primary school (see below). So, among the facilities for which permission is sought, why does the summary on the Council website mention the need for a cemetery? Twice?

“One 1-form entry primary school, a cemetery and associated building, sports and recreation facilities including children’s play, an extension to the country park, green infrastructure (including open space), community uses (including non-residential institutions) and cemetery. Access from former A30, landscaping, engineering (including modelling and drainage) works, demolition, associated infrastructure and car parking for all uses. All matters reserved except for access.”

With the new cemetery at Whimple, just what is EDDC not telling us!

Especially as Cranbrook has no projected housing for the elderly!

Never mind the quality- feel the (weight of) the pages!

In response to my recent plea for Watch Readers to submit articles (to eastdevonwatch@gmail.com ), Owl has just received this:

The latest round of consultation on the local plan ends on 30 September, see previous Watch article:

Further evidence for the Local Plan and EDDC tries to pass the buck to the National Trust and Woodland Trust for required open spaces

Readers may not have had time, or indeed may never have the time, to look at the paper deluge Ed Freeman has sent to Inspector Thickett this time around. It comprises a covering letter from Ed; a summary report and 13 supporting papers all of which amount to over 1,000 pages!

It’s the latest attempt by EDDC to try to convince Mr Thickett that 17,100 (minimum) is the right housing target over the next 18 years; that we have a 5+ year land supply in East Devon, despite what the Developers’ say; that none of this building will have an adverse effect on our rare landscape and habitats (all we need is collective membership of the National Trust (see above); and to carry out some belated consultations and box ticking exercises.

There are:

6 papers on housing delivery;
2 papers on housing numbers;
an overdue Habitat Assessment

plus the republishing of

2 supporting papers,
one commissioned by the National Trust
the other for Cranbrook;

and, finally,

2 papers on a sustainability box ticking exercise.

There are also two public consultations in progress: one on Gypsy sites the other on village Built Up Area Boundaries (BUABs).

All this should have been done in preparation of the Draft Plan years ago [at least in 2011 and possibly earlier when “The Local Development Framework Panel” was spending its time, under ex-Councillor Brown, mostly visiting sites of interest to the East Devon Business Forum – ed].

So is this the action of a Local Planning Authority confident in what it is doing – or does it have the feel someone desperately trying to play catch-up?

Four consultancy contractors have been employed to write these papers during August 2015.

Hard cases are hard to sell.

Dear Reader, it is all being done in your name, guess who is footing the bill!

The Skypark debacle: a bit more information

Why is officer time NEVER costed?
How come the developer didn’t know the implication of EU regulations from the start?

these, and many other questions, remain a mystery:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/relocation_to_skypark#comment-63210

Welcome to Elysium …

“Elysium: a place or state of perfect happiness”

EDDC’s Annual Report for 2014/15 is now out:

(http://eastdevon.gov.uk/media/1316010/annual-report-2014-15-website.pdf)

and those reading it might be forgiven for thinking that the opening letter of the acronym stands for Elysium as opposed to East. Because everything in East Devon is, if the report is to be believed, Absolutely Fabulous.

One doesn’t expect reports of this kind to be brutally truthful. But one is entitled to expect some degree of modesty and acknowledgement that life is not all a bed of roses. Not however if you are Cllr Diviani: “this annual report is an opportunity to pause and reflect on our successes over the past 12 months before we look forward … to … the next four years”. It’s an opportunity also, of course, to reflect on abject failures. To have seen some references to ‘challenges’ might have been a bit more honest, Cllr Diviani.

The report reveals that more than half of respondents don’t think EDDC is doing a good job delivering jobs in the west of the district or making towns better places to live. Still, never mind, notwithstanding the grumpy 12,000 people who signed a petition against the demolition of Elizabeth Hall in Exmouth – no fewer than 44 jobs were created when Premier Inn bulldozed the site and put up a hotel! (In fact the creation of these 44 jobs is such an achievement that a photo of the opening of the Premier Inn takes up half of page 12 of the Report.)

But the best spin of all is to read that in 2014/15 EDDC received a record number of planning applications (1,221), and the record number of appeals received (74) constituted a 77% success rate. Good news? Only up to a point. Had EDDC got its act together and a Local Plan in place, taxpayers’ money wouldn’t have been wasted receiving so many applications, and defending so many appeals, in the first place.

As it is, the only mention of the Local Plan in the report is confined to a single sentence, conveying the impression that its progression to a “second round of hearing sessions” is perfectly normal, and that its likely adoption in late 2015/early 2016 and is not years and years behind schedule, as the savvier voters know only too well.