Oh dear, Mrs Kerridge – as EDDC “Tourism Champion” you haven’t done your homework!

In today’s Sidmouth Herald (see post below) Sheia Kerridge, who has been as silent about tourism as Hugo Swire has been about the Local Plan, promises that, now she has retired after 42 years, she can devote more time to her work as a councillor, particularly “a waterborne transport link along the Jurassic Coast”.

But see here – its already been discounted as too expensive and unfundable by your own town council’s tourism chief, Simon Pollentine as late as December 2014!

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/jurassic_ferry_dream_too_costly_1_3882884

East Devon Alliance announces its first district council contenders

A full house of 7 Independents for Sidmouth including 4 EDA members standing as EDA candidates:

http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/news/20150227/electoral-registration-first-set-of-candidates/

Independents day, not just for Sid Valley. Watch this movement spread!!

Full text of the Sidmouth Herald report is here: http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/in-the-press/20150227/sidmouth-herald-independents-day-for-valley/ and here: http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/sidmouth_herald_20150227_page_5_charter.jpg?56fb72

And/ or/ click on the pics below to zoom in:

EPSON MFP image

EPSON MFP image

EPSON MFP image

EPSON MFP image

Independent, united challenge needed across the district

And it has already started! Sidmouth Herald front page story to follow!

…”The Constituency’s MP Hugo Swire appears to pay very little attention to local matters, preferring instead to concentrate on his Ministerial activities. It is rare to hear about Hugo intervening or commenting on local matters, something that a good proactive local MP ought to do. Is Hugo distracted by all of his Ministerial trips abroad?

Our District Council, as everyone knows, has an overwhelming Conservative majority. As everyone will also know the District Council has, particularly over the past 4 years or so, been beset with an apparent indifference by the Conservative majority group to the concerns and wishes of the electorate; those they were elected to serve. More and more the word “arrogance” is used when electors describe the Conservative Councillors attitude to them.”

http://realzorro1.blogspot.co.uk/

EDDC making a complete U-turn on housing figures before elections?

First they had to be concealed until after the election because they were “politically sensitive” and now news that they might be published within the next 10 days according to this blog:

https://susiebond.wordpress.com/

What on earth is going on at the Fawlty Towers known as Knowle? How can they be ” politically sensitive” one week and not politically sensitive the next week? Is panic mode the default mode at EDDC these days with no-one knowing what is going on?

Is it a case that Mid-Devon jumped the gun on consultation – putting their new draft Local Plan out to consultation without the Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA)figures and saying they would be available to the public by the end of February? Mid Devon has relied on the same consultants’ reports that East Devon is relying on. How could they put a draft plan out for consultation without the figures? Surely you cannot consult on incomplete information?

So, EDDC do we get the figures AND the consultants reports behind them before the elections or after? If before, what was the justification for trying to conceal them until after?

And if we get only your figures and not the reports, why?

And how come you are “tweaking” the reports anyway if Mid Devon has already used the information?

What’s that smell?

So Hugo Swire says he can’t influence planning decisions – that’s odd because …

…. look what he says on his website: “On Thursday 19 February, local MP Hugo Swire officially opened the new premises of Sheds Direct Devon – a manufacturer of quality garden buildings, ranging from sheds to garden studios, now based between Broadclyst and Whimple. Sheds Direct Devon Limited was previously based in Ebford, Nr Topsham, but owner Leigh Perry decided to look for bigger premises in order to accommodate a sharp increase in orders. Mr Perry found his ideal premises in Wards Cross, Broadclyst, Nr Whimple, well over a year ago but was initially prevented from moving by EDDC as the factory was not on a bus or cycle route. However, following the intervention of East Devon MP Hugo Swire, the council reversed their decision and allowed Mr Perry and his team to move. Commenting, Mr Swire said: ‘I was absolutely delighted to open the new premises of Sheds Direct Devon’. ‘Sheds Direct Devon has grown exponentially over the past two or three years and this excellent new factory will give the business the space to expand even further’. ‘I am proud of the small part that I played in persuading EDDC that allowing Sheds Direct Devon to relocate would be beneficial to the local area, not detrimental. We really should be doing all that we can to help local businesses to grow and take on more staff’. Sheds Direct Devon Limited’s owner Leigh Perry said: ‘It seemed apt that Hugo Swire performed the official opening of our wonderful new premises as we wouldn’t be here if it wasn’t for him. He was instrumental in getting EDDC to reconsider their decision and we are certainly grateful to him for that’.

Shame you couldn’t help the rest of us with the Local Plan, Mr Swire.

Source: http://www.hugoswire.org.uk/news/hugo-officially-opens-new-sheds-direct-devon-premises

Progress update on Village Plan and EDDC Plan

From Save Clyst St Mary organiser, Gaeron Kayley:

‘A big thank you to everyone that attended the meeting with Hugo Swire last week. A number of questions came up regarding our neighbourhood plan and our local plan.

Please See the update from Mike Howe regarding our local Plan below*.

Please also see our poster advertising the neighbourhood plan, where you can view and have your say on our Parish. Click here to open Exhibition poster (1) . (Saturday 7th March at Clyst St Mary School 10am- 4pm, 10th March Cat and Fiddle Inn 10am-Noon & Sowton Village Hall 6pm-9pm)’

*email fromMike Howe:

The production of the SHMA has unfortunately been a long and drawn out process. There are 6 key stages to the production of the SHMA. These are:

Definition of the housingmarket area

Understanding household projections

Addressing Market Signals

Addressing Housing Backlog

Measuring Affordable Housing Need

Future Employment and Economic Growth Assumptions and Aspirations

A so-called draft SHMA was sent through from the consultants in August 2014 after they had completed only the first two stages of the process. This information was communicated to Members via a report to Development Management Committee on the 26th August 2014 and an all Members briefing note on the 27th August 2014. This report and briefing note made it clear that the information available so far simply

modelled housing numbers based on historic trends and that without taking account of factors such as the backlog of affordable housing need and projecting future employment and economic growth the information was largely meaningless. No further draft SHMA information has been made available to any Members since that time indeed until the SHMA process is complete and all factors have been taken into account any data would have been misleading. I appreciate that this delay has been highly frustrating for all of us but we have been entirely dependent on consultants to carry out this work. Given the expertise required and the need to consider data from all of the authorities within the housing area there was no other option than to use external consultants on this work. Unfortunately, it has taken them much longer than envisaged.

In advance of receipt of the final SHMA Mid-Devon District Council have proceeded with production and consultation on their Local Plan. It is understood that their work is based on the draft SHMA data that all of the participating authorities received in August 2014 and some subsequent employment projections. Mid-Devon do not have any additional data than we do, however their position is slightly more straight forward as they do not have a growth point and therefore it is easier to predict factors such as future job growth in Mid-Devon than it is here in East Devon. Clearly there are risks associated with Mid-Devon’s approach however this is not our concern as we must focus on delivering our own Local Plan.

I am pleased to say that the SHMA work is now complete and only yesterday a draft report was provided by the consultants to officers of the commissioning authorities. The work now needs to be considered by officers and any queries raised with the consultants before the report can be finalized and published. This will happen in the next week to 10 days. We envisage publishing the SHMA in a co-ordinated way between the authorities and their respective Members with the report being sent to Members slightly in advance of wider publication.

The SHMA was the remaining key piece of evidence that enables us to produce an objectively assessed housing need for the district and move forward with the Local Plan. We had previously envisaged that the upcoming election would prevent progress being made until May however the Inspector has made it clear that he expects to see the proposed changes to the Local Plan by mid-April and we must adhere to the timescale that he has set as the process moving forward is led by the inspector.

Our time line now looks like this:

 Early March – Publication of the SHMA

 By end of March (pre-purdah) – DMC and full council meeting to consider

revisions to the Local Plan including proposed housing numbers

 Submission of revisions to Inspector immediately following incorporation of

any changes following full council

 Inspector provides questions upon which to seek views through consultation

 Consultation commences (mid-April)

 Consultation ends (end May)

 Oral examination sessions reconvene (August/September)

 Local Plan adoption by end of year

New procurement rules for Local Authorities

… Contracting authorities are required to ensure that any new procurement opportunities, above thresholds, are published on Contracts Finder (in addition to, or instead of, any other portal or publications route they may currently use).

Once a contract has been awarded as a result of a procurement process, contracting authorities must also publish details of who has won the contract, the contract value, and for procurements below the EU thresholds, indicate whether the winning supplier is a small business or voluntary sector organisation.

3. Thresholds for publishing opportunities

The threshold for publishing is £10,000 contract value, for central government and £25,000 contract value, for non central government contracting authorities.

Click to access Guidance_on_the_new_transparency_requirements_for_publishing_on_contracts_finder.pdf

Hypocritical, Councillor Diviani? You bet!

“In a budget speech on Wednesday, district council leader Paul Diviani said he was proud of the authority’s cap on the charge, which is the lowest in Devon.

[After saying council tax would be frozen this year Councillor Diviani] added: “I intend again to recommend we freeze our members’ allowances for next year, as we cannot expect our people to understand why we should consider our circumstances to be any different from the majority of the population of East Devon.”

http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/district_bosses_freeze_council_tax_1_3972096

But, Leader Diviani, your circumstances are VERY different to ours – you are about to move into a multi-million pound suite of new and unnecessary offices paid for by US. How does that square with the above comment?

AND frozen council tax is achieved only by (a) cutting services (b) selling off assets or (c) a combination of (a) and (b).

(It hasn’t been achieved by cutting staff: EDDC is one of few local authorities that has increased staff numbers over the past 4 years of austerity).

Did full council reject a proposal that relocation decision should be postponed until after elections in May? Decide for yourself

In an article in the Express and Echo, a “council spokesperson said: “At full council in December, Members rejected a proposal that the decision should be postponed until after the election and tasked the deputy chief executive with continuing to progress the project.”

This is not strictly true. The minutes of that meeting included a proposal (below) that set out the steps that needed to be taken to progress a possible relocation but no mention whatsoever was made in those minutes of the need to settle the matter before the district council elections in May 2015.

In December 2014, EDDC Tories were presumably confident that they would continue to be the majority party after May 2015. It is only since developments AFTER that date (significantly the formation of the East Devon Alliance support network for a large number of independent candidates for district council) that the Executive body appears to have taken the decision (when?, where?) to accelerate and merge meetings to try to force this decision through before the cut-off date of the end of March 2015.

Here are the specific minutes:

RESOLVED:
1. that the emerging changes to the relocation project be recognised and the

following be agreed:

The marketing exercise for Knowle and Manstone has resulted in a range of offers and, following a detailed assessment process, price, form and quality of development propositions have been received that merit further detailed negotiation towards selection of a preferred developer.

Leading offers for Knowle do not include options to sell Manstone in which case EDDC can choose to retain Manstone for the foreseeable future as a depot function and continued employment use.

The reduced offer for EDDC’s Heathpark site no longer represents a sufficiently persuasive level of capital receipt and will not be pursued further.

The retention of Heathpark in EDDC ownership means that this now represents the most cost effective and straightforward location to develop a new headquarters building for the Council.

Relocation to Skypark is no longer a viable proposition based on the reduced offer for Heathpark and combination of Knowle market value and prudential borrowing.

The East Devon Business Centre (EDBC) should preferably be retained and could potentially be combined within a new EDDC HQ development.

In the interim,Exmouth Town Hall has been vacated by Devon County.

A new HQ in Honiton can be restricted in size and cost to a 170 desk equivalent

scale with an improved Exmouth Town Hall for 80 EDDC staff as a main satellite office in the district’s largest community.

As part of its commitment to more mobile working and accessibility, the Council will offer a service presence as customers require in future at locations elsewhere in the district.

That relocation continues to make financial and operational sense on a whole life cost basis, specifically 20-year projections combining capital receipt and repayment of prudential borrowing versus existing office running cost and unfunded expenditure on existing building repair, maintenance and improvement.

that the Deputy Chief Executive, in consultation with the Office Accommodation Executive Group, be authorised to take forward further actions in pursuit of the above recommendations and Project Plan,

that further reports be produced for Cabinet and Council on project progress and to seek formal approval for any disposal of Knowle;

that a thorough examination of all facts and figures in respect of the relocation be carried out by:

a) The Audit and Governance Committee

b) The Overview and Scrutiny Committee

c) The internal auditors

d) The independent external auditors

Sources:
http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/East-Devon-District-Council-accused-8220-forcing/story-26080434-detail/story.html

http://new.eastdevon.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/committees-and-meetings/council/minutes/17-december-2014/

“Anyone who has a ruler” can check mistakes made by EDDC’s relocation team, Full Council told.

The question from the public at last night’s Full Council meeting, was from Richard Eley, of Save Our Sidmouth. He called for an apology from EDDC to Sidmouth resident Robin Fuller, whose study of the modern buildings at Knowle had shown that the size had been seriously understated by the Office Relocation team led by Richard Cohen. Mr Fuller was right, and EDDC should therefore apologise for not taking his findings into account. The buildings were “40% larger than you were told”, claimed Mr Eley. This was not a small error, he continued, and warned, “Imagine what a judge at a Judicial Review would make of that”.

More on the Full Council meeting to follow.

Exmouth Town Council rejects EDDC plans to make Town Hall car park “pay and display”

So where will EDDC officers park if the Town Hall becomes a Honiton satellite centre?  Just can’t see them paying for parking in Exmouth and getting free parking in Honiton.  Or will they get special dispensation to park anywhere in East Devon –  and maybe even Teignbridge and Exeter!

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Exmouth-pay-display-parking-plan-rejected/story-26084648-detail/story.html

Behind closed doors

Community Voice on Planning (CoVoP) groups seem to have started a craze on youtube.  Bradford have adapted it for themselves, after FRAGOFF  (www.fragoff.co.uk) set the ball rolling.

See  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijhAwpoQHvM       And  here’s Bradford’s version  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qw-UOPLsIIw

Mmm, wonder if fellow CoVoP members, East Devon Alliance, will appear on youtube sometime soon? We’ll keep you informed..

 

 

 

‘East Devon District Council accused of “forcing” a vote on controversial relocation project’ , reports Exeter Express and Echo

By Exeter Express and Echo | Posted: February 25, 2015
The Knowle in Sidmouth

A LEADING East Devon District Councillor has accused the council of “forcing” a vote on its controversial relocation project ahead of the local elections in May.

The council’s relocation project is set to be decided upon next month, because of the looming local elections.

Ward member for Ottery St Mary Councillor Claire Wright, criticised council officials for prematurely “forcing” a vote on the project “just days “ before the pre-election period known as purdah which prevents council’s from making any major decisions so as not avoid the risk of prejudice.

The council was pursuing plans to relocate to a purpose built office at SkyPark. However, at the end of November, the local authority announced a U-turn on its plans and instead the council backed the revised plan for the council to retain the council-owned East Devon Business Centre at Heathpark in Honiton where a new build will also be constructed – formerly earmarked for a supermarket – and to use existing space at Exmouth Town Hall.

Councillors have been informed that a meeting of the Cabinet has been brought forward a week to March 11, and will include a report on the office relocation.

A joint meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny and Audit and Governance committees is being held the day later to make recommendations on the relocation report.

And, at an additional meeting of the full council on March 25, a decision will be made on the relocation.

Cllr Wright, said: “It is a shocking indictment of the way that the Conservative leadership operates at the Knowle.

“This is the most controversial and costly project, apart from the local plan, which incidentally has been deliberately delayed until after the election, in years.

“There has been stacks of concern about the facts and figures, as well as the enormous cost and the millions that would need to be borrowed.

“So, instead of waiting to allow a new council to make up its own mind on the plans, the Conservatives force through a vote, just days before the election period starts.

“What a disrespectful way to run a council.”

A council spokesperson, said: “The special council meeting to decide on the proposed office move needs to take place before the end of March so that the proceedings do not fall inside the purdah period leading up to the local election on May 7, during which time no major decisions can be taken.

“The scheduled date for Cabinet was March 18, but there would not have been sufficient time for the council to receive the paperwork from Cabinet so as to discuss it on March 25.

“It was therefore agreed that the cabinet meeting would take place on March 11, to allow more time.

“It also followed that the cabinet reports and recommendation would need to be referred to Overview & Scrutiny and Audit & Governance Committees before full council.

“The chairs of those committees have therefore agreed to meet in a single session on March 12, with one item on the agenda – office relocation.

“That will allow time for all the documentation to be processed and available for councillors to make an informed decision at their meeting on March 25.”

he added: “At full council in December, members rejected a proposal that the decision should be postponed until after the election and tasked the deputy chief executive with continuing to progress the project.

“In the interests of transparency, the cabinet deliberations must be scrutinised by both committees.”

Naughty, naughty EDDC

to take the schedule of meetings off your (new) website when you plan to push Knowle relocation and land grab through before the end of this council session and before the district council elections in May 2015.

Now, why would you do that?

This is the web page from which the information has been removed:

http://new.eastdevon.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/committees-and-meetings/

Council and Democracy – yet another oxymoron!

We have identified most of those 6,000 missing voters – just in time for the coming elections

Our long- running campaign (Sidmouth Independent News, EDA former blog, then this blog) has – with little thanks to EDDC – ensured that our district has at last caught up with most of the 6,000 voters missing from the electoral register in 2014 – a misfortune that got our CEO and Electoral Returning Officer, Mark Williams, hauled before the Parliamentary Commission on Voter Engagement to explain. Rather unsatisfactorily.

In its most recent report: http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/182375/Analysis-of-the-December-2014-electoral-registers-in-England-and-Wales.pdf

the Electoral Commission has this to say about East Devon, key paragraph:

“In contrast, in East Devon, where the challenges are different, there hjas been an increase in the number of entries on the register. The ERO has attributed this to the success of making visits to non-responding properties and individuals, which were carried out across the area in 2014 for the first time since 2010.”

In other words, Mark Williams has effectively admitted that, had he carried our doorstep canvassing as he was required to do between 2010 and 2014, rather than trying to cut corners (for whatever reason) then most of the missing voters would have almost certainly been registered in that period.

This could well have affected the outcome of European elections in East Devon and, had these voters not made it on to the register, the outcome of district and Parliamentary Elections in May 2015. An election where results may hinge on only scores or hundreds of votes.

Next on the agenda to fix – Households of Multiple Occupation.

Mobile phone 3G coverage in Devon – pathetic

Recall that, not long ago, our EDDC councillors, piggy-backing on the promises of the national Conservative Party, were boasting that, pretty soon, Devon would be covered with whizzily fast broadband coverage. That continued till it transpired that, in fact, it wasn’t going to happen.

In fact it was poor tendering on the part of councils dealing with the project which gave BT a stranglehold and a preference for dealing with the easy connections and not bothering with the, largely rural, infrastructure that cost more to put in.

Now we hear the shocking news that only 15% of Devon can receive 3G phone coverage. This is the coverage that would at least allow users to get their internet and email on their smartphones if they could not get broadband coverage. It isn’t 4G – that allows very, very fast coverage on smartphones and tablets, which is now available in many areas – but the slower, clunkier, now old-fashioned 3G!

Wouldn’t the millions of pounds being spent on flash new offices be better spent ensuring our medium and small businesses (including rural tourism) was in the 21st century?

Or will we operate a two-tier system: the nearer you are to the Science Park and the “Growth Point” the better you will be treated?

T“The most recent data published by the regulator shows that Devon has most limited mobile phone access of any local authority area in the South West. In just 15% of the county’s geographic landmass can a 3G signal be picked up with the “Big 4” networks, namely Vodafone, 02, Three and EE.

The parlous provision continues across the rural areas of the South West. In Cornwall, 3G coverage for all operators is 25% of Cornwall’s geography, 26% in Dorset and 38% in Somerset.

By contrast, in Plymouth, the biggest urban area in the Westcountry, coverage is 99% of the city, as it is with the capital and most built-up areas in the UK.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Devon-mobile-phone-coverage-branded-8220/story-26071993-detail/story.html

Councillor Ian Thomas has taken this post to task in a comment saying the first paragraph is “not truthful” and wants it changed. This is an issue that may be judged subjectively, but this post below does look like boasting and all the people mentionec by name are (or were at the time) Conservatives:

http://www.trinitymatters.co.uk/index.php/component/k2/item/552-government-gives-green-light-for-major-devon-and-somerset-super-fast-broadband-investment

Where is the EDDC Audit and Governance Agenda for 5 March?

Surely the agenda should be in the public domain by now for a 5 March meeting?

And the calendar of meeting dates has also mysteriously disappeared from the “Council Meetings” web page too.

Hhhmm.

UK Food Security

Interestingly, one point not mentioned by the National Farmers Union is the amount of Grade 1 agricultural land lost to speculative building which leads to the land being worth up to £1 million per acre when planning permission is received – especially in areas such as ours where we have no Local Plan and no 6-year land supply. And where quite a few farmers are parish, town and/or district councillors (and even, in the past, running a plannung consultancy) and are sometimes developers themselves.

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/WMN-OPINION-UK-blas-food-security-unstable-world/story-26070915-detail/story.html