Franksy in fine form:

Franksy in fine form:

See agenda item 16 – pages 81 – 91 of papers for next Cabinet meeting on 9 November:
Of particular note:
· The budget estimate rising from £1.5m to £3.12m
· As per 2.1 and 2.2 – a planning application for phases 2 and 3 is being submitted, as a ‘technical exercise’ to sustain the planning application (as the outline would be due to expire). [Is this allowed?]
· As quoted on page 84 ‘The planning authority will seek responses from the public to the planning application but the Council itself is not proposing to go beyond this with additional consultation for this technical exercise’.
· Consultation is then mentioned as coming after the technical exercise, in language used to imply consultation will be thorough (despite missing the important issue of consultation needing to happen before decisions are made!).
· Having told the tenants of the Harbour View (in a public meeting) that the Harbour View will be considered a separate application, and framing it to sound altruistic and caring of them, they now state that the Regeneration board has considered marketing the Harbour View site BEFORE the rest of the site in recognition of its value!”
… Loads more in there, makes awful reading.
“A report has highlighted that costs for Exmouth’s Queen’s Drive project have now more than doubled – from £1.5 million to £3.1 million.
The figures come as East Devon District Council (EDDC) continue looking for “fresh ideas” for the biggest chunk of the nine-acre development site – after sacking the previous developer, Moirai, over the summer.
They say they will be consulting with residents, businesses and tourists for this ‘third phase’ of the Queen’s Drive site in Exmouth.

Freedom of Information request and (non) answer
[Exmouth] Watersports centre
Date submitted: 18 October 2016
Summary of request
“Please can you tell me, how will the proposed watersports centre on Exmouth seafront gain access to the sea?
Will there be a water channel bulldozed across the beach from where the existing road is right up to the waters edge?
Will the proposal effectively slice the beach into two sections separated by water?
What engineering assessment has been prepared of the effects of any such channel or watery access on the currents, wave action and ensuing changes to sediment/sand erosions and depositions?
Summary of response
No formal planning application has been received for the development you refer to and no information is currently held which provides answers to the questions you have raised.”
Date responded: 19 October 2016
“MORE attractive towns and cities would ease development pressure on the countryside, say rural campaigners.
Housing should be developed alongside transport infrastructure for economic, social and environmental benefits, says the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE).
The charity argues that high-density development near to high-quality public transport services could boost businesses and jobs.
It also calls for more well-designed homes and more diverse, exciting communities, arguing that they would reduce pressure on the Green Belt and the wider countryside.
The recommendations are made in CPRE’s ‘Making the Link’ paper which, it says, builds on emerging government thinking.
CPRE policy adviser Trinley Walker said: “To build the homes we need and make our towns attractive for residents and businesses, housing development and transport must go hand in hand.
“Good access to public transport should be an important factor when councils make decisions about where to build houses – yet it often gets side-lined.
“This means that in many towns the potential for regeneration, quality housing and better connected communities is missed.”
The paper highlights the government’s recent NPPF consultation identified 680 commuter hubs suitable for high density development.
It argues that attention can also be given to smaller places like market towns, which delivering connectivity, services, employment and business opportunities for rural communities.
Situating high-density housing near transport hubs can concentrate development on brownfield sites in need of regeneration and increase connectivity to employment centres, says the paper.
This has the potential to make towns more attractive for residents and business, halt damaging urban sprawl and reduce car use and road congestion, it argues.
The paper suggests a number of options to encourage such development.
These include reduced business rates for local businesses and the roll-out of planning tools to help identify suitable locations for development.
The paper calls for higher-density development based around public transport hubs, planned around local services and waking and cycling.
High density development needn’t mean tower blocks in market towns, it says.
Terraced housing and mansion blocks can provide high density homes and preserve the unique character of towns, the paper argues.
‘Making the Link’ is the sixth paper in CPRE’s Housing Foresight series, which aims to provide innovative policy solutions to critical housing issues.”
http://www.rsnonline.org.uk/environment/cities-can-ease-pressure-on-countryside
Talking Heads, “Road to Nowhere”:
“Road To Nowhere”
Well we know where we’re goin’
But we don’t know where we’ve been
And we know what we’re knowin’
But we can’t say what we’ve seen
And we’re not little children
And we know what we want
And the future is certain
Give us time to work it out
We’re on a road to nowhere
Come on inside
Takin’ that ride to nowhere
We’ll take that ride
I’m feelin’ okay this mornin’
And you know,
We’re on the road to paradise
Here we go, here we go
[CHORUS]
Maybe you wonder where you are
I don’t care
Here is where time is on our side
Take you there…take you there
We’re on a road to nowhere
We’re on a road to nowhere
We’re on a road to nowhere
There’s a city in my mind
Come along and take that ride
and it’s all right, baby, it’s all right
And it’s very far away
But it’s growing day by day
And it’s all right, baby, it’s all right
They can tell you what to do
But they’ll make a fool of you
And it’s all right, baby, it’s all right
We’re on a road to nowhere.”
http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/talkingheads/roadtonowhere.html
” … A number of seafront businesses, including DJ’s Cafe, have been forced to close this year, but it’s now being argued these attractions could have stayed open.
District council officers evicted the Wright family from Jungle Fun, Arnold Palmer Putting Green and Crazy Golf to make way for the proposed seafront regeneration.
The site has been earmarked for demolition to make way for a £4million watersports centre as part of the development.
The Wright family was given a stay of execution on the fun park, which will remain open until the end of August next year.
Large metal grey fences have now gone up around Jungle Fun, Arnold Palmer Putting Green and Crazy Golf.
East Devon District Council (EDDC) has confirmed it would be open to having attractions back on the site next summer, provided all demolition work has been completed.
Phillip Skinner, chairman of the Exmouth Regeneration Board, said: “The site must remain boarded up for safety reasons, at least until surveys have concluded, and clearance and demolition have been completed.
“We will look to open up the site again for the summer, if we are able, and will consider leisure, entertainment, food and drink-type attractions if this is feasible.”
In response to the news, Louise McAllister, of the Save Exmouth Seafront, said: “It is shocking that EDDC is stating that it ‘may open up the site again for summer (2017)’.
“While we would love to see the site back in use, if it was to be reopened, surely the existing successful businesses should never have been forced to close in the first place.
“The actions of EDDC surrounding this closure are so far removed from the best interests of the town that they are beginning to seem like either acts of deliberate cruelty towards the seafront tenants, or an example of the most dreadful project management imaginable.”
Owl’s summary of Moulding’s attempt to explain EDDC’s current “thinking”:
“We have been planning Exmouth Sea Front for 6 years and we know exactly what we are doing, even though our preferred bidder Moirai has only got initial ideas and we haven’t yet decided what Phase 3 will consist of or how much it will all cost. And it’s going to be completely built up yet very open – and sand drifts are exactly what everyone wants.”
The interview transcript:
“Simon Bates: In Exmouth a group of badgers are thought to be living near a former crazy golf course on the sea front, and they’re involved in a completely different type of dispute. At stake is the proposed multi-million pound development of the area, seen as crucial for Exmouth by East Devon District Council, but viewed by some locals as a terrible mistake for the town.
In the maelstrom, in the middle of it, trying to keep the peace is Adrian Campbell. Good morning Adrian. … What’s going on?
Adrian Campbell: Well, badgers and crazy golf – it does sound a bit peculiar I agree. On Queen’s Drive on the sea front in Exmouth the district council has plans for a quite a big development there. It’s close to the former crazy golf area. There’s also an amusement arcade nearby, and an old railway carriage cafe used to be there.
Now some of these have already gone, they’ve been fenced off, big changes are planned for an idea originally called Exmouth Splash. There’s been consultation about that before. They want to develop this area. Its close to another development that has already taken place known as Ocean, which is a big bowling area that has been built on the sea front just down from the Premier Inn.
However, on this site are badgers, and local people say that they believe that they were under the crazy golf course. That seems to have been confirmed – not so many of them, as there is a bigger sett further off the site.
We spoke to Louise McAllister from Save Exmouth Seafront…
Louise MacAllister: It was alerted to me by a local resident that there were badgers living in this site up until very recently. So I was a little bit concerned that they had already gone ahead with the demolition, because you have to apply for a license to interfere with a sett, and I am just a little bit worried that East Devon District Council have not had the time to do that.
Simon Bates: Can we talk about East Devon District Council because this sounds like a labyrinthine one, let alone about the sett. What did they tell you?
Adrian Campbell: Well they have confirmed that they have, first of all, found out using an expert, Dr. Julian Brown, that there are two small setts, part of a more significant complex badger sett off the site. However, this is important, they say that they have been working with Natural England and they’ve been given a license to relocated them to a larger sett. And they say, basically, that the work that has been done so far won’t have caused any problem and is perfectly OK. So that is what they are saying, but you have this larger issue, much larger issue, about what’s going to happen in the area and lots of controversy about that.
Simon Bates: Yes. That is a story I hadn’t thought of. Because where do you put badgers, because they don’t automatically go into other badger setts because that is a confrontation situation.
Adrian Campbell: Well they wouldn’t go far apparently. They would go just to the bigger sett nearby, but off the site. That’s what they said.
Simon Bates: But would that be OK with those badgers that already occupy the bigger sett.
Adrian Campbell: I don’t know. I’m not a badger expert.
Simon Bates: No, neither am I. But you know what dogs are like, and basically that’s what we are talking about.
Adrian Campbell: I was just going to say, presumably under the advice of Natural England, it should be OK. But then you’ve got this larger issue about this whole area and the big changes that are being proposed. And, some people have asked about modernising this area.
Effectively, there is a boating lake there with swans on it. It’s a very traditional seaside kind of scene at the moment, or it has been, and what is talked about here is a really big change. Now some people are quite keen on that – other people are slightly concerned about it. We spoke to one gentleman, Robin Rule, and is what he was saying.
Robin Rule: Our main priorities now are to try to preserve the boating lake and the fun park. Because the boating lake and the fun park is in fact the face, the face, of Exmouth Seafront. Millions of people love it, whether you live here, whether you are visiting it from holiday or around. That’s what we want to try to hold onto.
Simon Bates: Its the traditional against the future, isn’t it. The swans on the boating lake – I suppose you can call iconic. And then there are the other attractions that have been there for donkeys years vs. the new face of the seafront, the bowling centre you talked about, the Exmouth Ocean. Which vision do you think will win out?
Adrian Campbell: Well when you look at the plans, and I am looking at a plan that goes back to 2013, a big graphic showing what is proposed. Now the council has told me that it has changed quite a lot, but it’s a really large site. Some have told me locally it would be similar in size to the town centre of Exmouth, but right on the seafront. Now some people are a bit concerned about that, and you will hear from the council in a minute. We spoke to an independent councillor, Megan Armstrong, she’s quite worked up about it.
Cllr Megan Armstrong: What concerns people is that as soon as one building goes up it’s setting the scene for a whole more other buildings going up. And people just don’t want that. They like the openness, they like the facilities that are here because children love them, families love them, and they’re reasonably priced because a lot of people who come here don’t have a lot of money, and they’re families with children, at that’s why we get a lot of people coming here.
Simon Bates: Well, there’s the independent councillor Megan Armstrong. We’ve got, as you’ve hinted there Adrian, Cllr Andrew Moulding.
Good morning Cllr Moulding. Deputy Leader of East Devon District Council.
Adrian Campbell: Cllr, Good Morning. You’ve heard the reaction of some of the people there that we have spoken to. First of all, with the badgers, has the council got it right?
Cllr Andrew Moulding: Well, I heard your report, Adrian, on the situation with the badgers which is exactly as you stated. The council has a license from Natural England and during this sensitive process that is what we have to have. We have, and again you are quite right, we have a badger expert. He’s a leading consultant on badgers in the country, and that is Dr. Julian Brown. He’s identified that these two small setts are part of a more significant complex badger sett which is off the site, and in consultation with Dr Brown, the badgers who are living in these two small badger setts can quite amicably be relocated to the larger sett. And that’s what under the advice of Dr Brown and with the license from Natural England, that is what the council are carrying out.
Adrian Campbell: But what about the scale of this? Because people are saying in the area, people that we spoke to yesterday, and admittedly though a self-selecting group who turned up, but they are talking about the scale of this. I mean, how many millions is this going to cost, and how big is phase one, two and three?
Cllr Andrew Moulding: We don’t know the overall cost of this yet. What we do know is that we have put the project into three phases. The first phase is to relocate the road and the car park, so that the car park is further to the rear of the site and not inhibiting the views across the estuary. Similarly with the road. That will allow access to visitors and residents to the sea front. That will be stage one.
Stage two will be a very exciting water sports centre, built on the …
Adrian Campbell: It’s big isn’t it? It’s going to be very big?
Cllr Andrew Moulding: Oh yes, it’s pretty big, yes. It will, but it will encompass a water sports centre for people who are doing kite-surfing and so on, but also there will be an open-air performance space there, a number of small units that trade in water sports. So the attraction of water sports to Exmouth has always been well known. We already have national competitions at Exmouth and we obviously feel that this is something that will be well appreciated by visitors and locals alike.
Adrian Campbell: But just briefly, do you understand the concerns of local people who are saying that the scale of this dwarfs what has been there in the past traditionally. You’ve got the bowling centre down the road – they say that the council’s taken that on because it wasn’t making enough money, I don’t know whether that’s right or not. But they question whether or not there is the demand for all of this. And they also say this is a special area.
Cllr Andrew Moulding: Yes. There would almost be an anchor at each end. So you’ve got Ocean at one end, you’ll have the water sports centre at the other end, inbetween phase three is the development of what was the old fun park – or still is because we are allowing the tenant of the fun park to trade for another season while the details of that part of the site are being developed – so he will carry on and trade there until such time as we need the site to be vacated so that the phase three work can go ahead. That’s still to be determined …
Simon Bates: Actually, can I just jump in there Councillor Moulding because Adrian can’t ask you this, he’s is far too nice a man. It all sounds a bit woolly.
Cllr Andrew Moulding: No not woolly at all. I mean its a plan that’s been in the offing for about the last six years. Now at last it is coming to fruition. And obviously there are stages one needs to go through to arrange the necessary planning details, and so on. That is going through process at the moment. The first phase, as I say, is to relocate the road, move the car park, and then to get the water sports centre built, and then we can look in more detail at phase three which is the remainder of the site. We very much hope that the majority of the area will be open and free to people to use.
Simon Bates: It’s a very exposed site as well, isn’t it Councillor? You’ve got high seas and sand blowing in during the winter.
Cllr Andrew Moulding: That’s the beauty of the site. I mean, that’s what everybody likes about it. That it is …
Simon Bates: Yes, but your going to build up the whole place aren’t you?
Cllr Andrew Moulding: The water sports centre will have open spaces within it. But its a development which has been well planned, we are working with the …
Adrian Campbell: But you haven’t got drawings or architect’s plans yet, have you? And you haven;t got a developer as I understand, so people are saying that the area’s closed off, and they can’t get to it and use it.
Cllr Andrew Moulding: Well, we have the water sports centre, [sniggering heard in background] and we have a preferred developer in place, Moirai, who have come up with some initial proposals. We are looking closely at those to see if it is exactly what is required, we shall look carefully at that as phase three while the tenant is still on site so that the people of Exmouth can enjoy facilities on the site until we are ready to go forward with the next stage.
Simon Bates: Councillor, thank you very much indeed. Adrian, I think that’s all we are going to get, don’t you?
Adrian Campbell: I know. Thank you, Simon.
[Sounds of laughter from Simon Bates]
Simon Bates: Stay across it. Beaver or should I say badger away. Adrian Campbell, thank you very much indeed.”
THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION IS TODAY FROM 1pm – 8pm AT COUNTY HALL
WRITTEN RESPONSES BY 30 OCTOBER
“Draft Exe Estuary Management Plan 2016-2021
The draft Management Plan covering 2016-2021 for the Exe Estuary is now available through the link above for public consultation, for a six week period from 19th September to 30th October 2016. The plan has been reviewed since the Interim Management Plan 2012-2015, to take into consideration issues and changes that are highlighted in the updated State of the Exe Estuary 2014 report, and outlines policies, and five year objectives to ensure sustainable use of the Exe Estuary for the future.
A public consultation event will be held on Wenesday 5th October from 1pm to 8pm at County Hall, for those that would like to find out more about the Management Plan and offer their feedback. We will be able to offer guidance at the event on how you can best provide feedback during the consultation. In preparation, you may wish to consider these Guidance Questions.
The event will take place at the Council Chamber and Ante Chamber at County Hall, Topsham Road, Exeter, EX2 4QD. Travel information to the venue can be found here. I will be at the Council Chamber to enable access on the day.
If you are unable to make the workshop, please send your comments and observations via email to exeestua@devon.gov.uk. Please use the above Guidance Questions to help with your response, but we welcome comments on any aspects of the Management Plan. We strongly advise you to respond using ‘Track Changes’ within the document and state whether you are responding as an individual or on behalf of a group or organisation.
Your views are valuable to us and we appreciate your taking the time to read the document and make comments. We will endeavour to reply to everyone who takes part in the consultation (if we have contact details) and will consider all comments that are offered.”
There is currently a planning application submitted – 16/2087/DEM to demolish the DJ’s Diner building on Exmouth Seafront.
At the DMC on 8th March Cllr Williamson (Littleham) proposed the condition (which was agreed) for the road move application that the cafe and the beach huts should not be demolished, nor any start to be made on the road, until there was a timescale, etc. for the water sports centre.
No timescale yet exists, yet the planning application seems to be completely ignoring this decision.
Unfortunately, the working that went in the final planning application is ( surprise, surprise) rather vague (approval document listed under application – 15/2487/MRES). However for those who were at the DMC, they are quite certain that the proposed condition was for no work – including demolition.
And of course there is also the issue of the town poll being ignored and EDDC ploughing ahead with leaving the area derelict regardless.
“Brown has been a freelance badger consultant since 1996 and is largely contracted to undertake badger surveys for the planning, construction and development industries.”
“ANIMAL campaigners have won a reprieve for a Bridport wildlife haven after a last ditch appeal to planners.
Retired zoologist Harry Britton and his wife Jill are fighting to save what they claim is an important home for badgers on the town’s New Zealand site where 15 homes are to be built.
Last week developers Hunt and Son asked West Dorset District Council to remove a condition preventing the bulldozers moving in until a protection zone has been establish around the setts once identified there.
They claimed a study by their badger expert Dr Julian Brown in late May had confirmed that the animals no longer live on the land.
But Mr and Mrs Britton, who live at Folly Mill Gardens next to the site, say they have conclusive evidence the badgers are still in residence.
And backed by Bridport Town Council they successfully persuaded the development control committee to halt the building work and order a new independent badger survey of the land.
Chairman Fred Horsington used his casting vote to back the protesters after the committee decision was split 4-4.
The reprieve came after Mr Britton argued that Dr Brown’s findings were flawed.”
http://www.bridportnews.co.uk/news/8270767.Bridport__Badgers_silence_site_bulldozers/
Deputy CEO Cohen and Deputy …. whatever, something or other, waffle …. Councillor Moulding were both very, very vague about where the main badger setts (plural) are on Exmouth seafront.
Under the Premier Inn?
Under the Bowling Alley?
Under Exmouth Town Hall?
Owl thinks we should be told!
Brian May’s latest Save the Badger song:

Source: today’s BBC Spotlight Richard Cohen, Deputy CEO of EDDC and Regeneration supremo, interviewed on Exmouth seafront said that “EDDC will do right by them”.
Unfortunately for us (though fortunately for the badger set under the demolished Crazy Golf area) he meant only the badgers.
Badgers are a protected species whereas human beings are not. Though perhaps someone should check that they don’t come under the Devon gassing orders.
Looks like EDDC got him down there pretty fast after the Moulding omnishambles on Radio Devon earlier – see post below.

BBC iPlayer, Radio Devon this morning, Simon Bates
From 1:05:15
After a fair amount of discussion about the badger set found under the Crazy Golf and some local “vox pop’, Independent EDA Councillor Megan Armstrong can be heard at 1:09:53 followed by Tory Councillor Andrew Moulding at 1:10:28.
By 1:14:30, when Moulding has said nothing whatsoever of interest or use, simply regurgitating old, old, information, Simon Bates feels obliged to cut into Moulding’s waffle (and it IS ultra-top-grade waffle) Moulding says “the water sports park will have open spaces in it” (1:15:28). He doesn’t even understand why what he said was so silly!
When Moulding says they have a developer for the water sports development and also HAVE (not had) a preferred developer for the rest of the site, Moirai Capital Ltd, Bates breaks into laughter. He then says really ruefully: “Well, Adrian I think that’s all we are going to get, don’t you?” to which Adrian (the on-site reporter) says, just as ruefully and with a big sigh “”I know …” at which point they both break into peals of laughter!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p046w538
Summary: 30 seconds of Independent EDA councillor being totally focused and on point, then roughly 5 minutes of Councillor Moulding saying nothing at all, waffling and being laughed at by two radio presenters!
By Owl’s reckoning that leaves BBC Radio Devon owing Councillor Megan Armstrong 4.5 minutes of air time for right of reply.
Though, to be fair, Moulding said nothing anyone COULD reply to!
Which EDDC councillor got laughed at on air by a BBC presenter this morning for a daft answer to a question about Exmouth seafront regeneration and EDDC’s links with Moirai Capital Investments?
Answer: Councillor Andrew Moulding!
From a correspondent:
“Cllr Moulding seemed very flustered when questioned on radio Devon about the opinions of locals and EDDC financial support for the Ocean complex. Ignoring the question entirely, Cllr Moulding proceeded on his own agenda to talk about phase three of the development, leaving the presenters laughing incredulously.
Additionally, Cllr Moulding agreed that people love the openness of the space but that it is okay to develop on that because the watersports centre will include open space! I’m not entirely sure Cllr Moulding actually understands how people value open space?!”
Er, is it open space when you have to pay to use it Councillor Moulding? Owl guesses that, in EDDC la-la-land, where money rules, it probably is!
Of interest for Exmouth … if it could get a £50,000 donation towards costs!
“A council in Surrey has vowed to defend “as strongly as rpossible” a High Court challenge to its decision to proceed with a much-delayed regeneration scheme.
A preliminary hearing to determine whether campaigners in Farnham have the right to challenge Waverley Borough Council’s decision on the Brightwells Farnham Regeneration Scheme is set to be heard in the High Court on 31 January 2017.
The Farnham Interest Group (FIG) – which represents the Farnham Society, the Farnham Building Preservation Trust and the East Street Action Group – argues that the “massive and unsustainable” scheme fails to provide what the council offered when it first set out its ideas for the development in 2003.
FIG is seeking to overturn a planning decision taken by the council on 24 May 2016 to proceed with the development, having made changes to the scheme. The claimant will argue that the changes were significant and the contract should have been retendered as developers who tendered for the original scheme were put at a disadvantage to the development partner, Crest Nicolson. FIG has already secured a £50,000 donation from an anonymous donor to help with the legal challenge.
Cllr Julia Potts, Leader of Waverley, said: “While it is good news that the court has agreed to allow a preliminary hearing, it is disappointing that council tax payers will have to pay for the council’s costs to defend the scheme which delivers jobs, homes and numerous community and financial benefits to Farnham and the borough as a whole.
“The construction phase was due to start in autumn 2016; this will now have to be delayed, impacting on the delivery timetable. It will be upsetting for the residents who were so keen to see this scheme go ahead as quickly as possible.
“Given the Brightwells Farnham Regeneration Scheme is a key corporate priority, the council will defend the judicial review challenge as strongly as possible and is proceeding with the Compulsory Purchase of the Marlborough Head pub to complete the site assembly.”
Cllr Potts said notices had been served to action the compulsory purchase with the council taking possession of the Marlborough Head site on 2 December 2016. Possession of the pub site would create the main pedestrian access to the new development from East Street in Farnham. The CPO was approved by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government in 2013.”

Residents will be pleased to hear that the Overview Committee at EDDC is considering a review how regeneration boards operate.
They will probably not be pleased to hear that no date has been set for the review.
Click to access 270916-overview-agenda-combined.pdf
(page 26)