Claims that Chinese Government has secret plans if EDF do not build Hinkley C

“The Chinese government has secret plans to build two nuclear reactors at Hinkley Point if a joint deal for a new nuclear power station with French company EDF falls through, it has been claimed.

Lord Howell of Guildford, George Osborne’s father-in-law, told the House of Lords that the Chinese were actively discussing a ‘plan B’ if the existing £21 billion plan fails.

Addressing a fellow peer, Lord Howell, the Conservative energy secretary under Margaret Thatcher, said: ‘Is my noble friend aware that the Chinese also have a plan B, which is to bypass EDF altogether and to build two smaller reactors on the Hinkley C site, and to do it rather quicker than the present Hinkley C plans?’

He later told The Times that he had previously had private meetings with Chinese delegations, and said: ‘This is the view of informed think tanks and a deduction of the way they must be thinking.’

His warning will put greater pressure on the Hinkley C project, which is planned to provide about seven per cent of the country’s electricity.
Yesterday, EDF announced a 16 per cent increase on the cost of the project since October, from £18 billion to £21 billion.

The French energy giant also admitted that the project would not be finished before 2027, which is a decade later than was originally proposed.

There have been repeated delays with designing and construction of the plant, which will take at least nine and a half years to build once it has been signed off. This is not now due to happen until September.

Lord Howell suggested that the second plan would involve building two smaller nuclear reactors at Hinkley Point ‘rather quicker’.

Senior intelligence and military figures warned that national security could be threatened by Chinese nuclear reactors after fears that technological ‘trapdoors or backdoors’ might be put into computer systems. This would allow China to bypass Britain’s security measures.

Lisa Nandy, the shadow energy secretary, told The Times: ‘If there is a secret Chinese plan B for Hinkley, ministers should tell us precisely what that is.

‘With uncertainty over both the timetable and the cost of this project, it is now imperative that the government offer reassurance that British jobs will be protected, costs on households will be kept under control and that binding pollution targets will not be put at risk.’

A Department of Energy spokesman said: ‘There is no proposal for the Chinese to build a reactor at Hinkley.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3588179/China-s-secret-plan-build-two-Hinkley-reactors-joint-deal-EDF-falls-through.html

change.org petition started for Alison Hernandez to stand down

“Alison Hernandez, Police and Crime Commissioner for Devon and Cornwall, should stand down.”

https://www.change.org/p/opcc-devonandcornwall-pnn-police-uk-alison-hernandez-police-and-crime-commissioner-for-devon-and-cornwall-should-stand-down

“Gentrification of the countryside”

A court decision to uphold controversial Government reforms to affordable housing laws will result in further “gentrification” of the countryside, rural campaigners have warned.

Anita Grice, director of the Campaign to Protect Rural England in Cornwall, said the ruling on changes to Section 106 agreements will hit communities in the South West “hard”.

While North Devon councillor Brian Greenslade has warned it will push younger families out of the countryside, putting the future of rural schools at risk.

Ministers confirmed on Wednesday that plans to exempt small-scale developments from section 106 affordable housing obligations had been restored by the Court of Appeal.

The decision followed a lengthy court battle, which initially saw the Government policy overturned.

This latest move has been welcomed by construction firms, who claim the changes will make smaller, more sustainable housing projects financially viable.

Brian Berry, chief executive of the Federation of Master Builders, said the new system will lift “serious barriers” for small and medium sized firms to deliver much needed housing.

campaigners argue that these small-scale projects – defined as five or less properties in rural areas – are a crucial source of affordable housing in the countryside.

Ms Grice said the availability of affordable stock in areas like Devon and Cornwall is already “dire” and the new ruling “will make it even worse”.

“It means that local authorities will have less say on the type of housing that gets built and affordable housing provision in our market towns and villages will become even more squeezed,” she said.

“Less provision means that many local people will find it difficult, if not impossible, to remain in areas where they have community ties.

“Instead we will see more housing built for the open market – and this will contribute to the ever-increasing gentrification of our countryside.”

Shadow Lib Dem leader cllr Greenslade added: “If local planning authorities cannot condition for some affordable housing in rural communities then younger families will decamp to larger urban areas. Such depopulation of younger families will threaten the future of small schools for example.

Taking this together with the Tories voting down the wholly sensible amendments put forward in the Lords in respect of the Housing and Planning Bill… the Government has dealt a hammer blow to the housing aspirations of many local young people.”

The Department for Communities and Local Government said the ruling “restores common sense to the system” and will encourage new developments.

Housing minister Brandon Lewis said: “This will now mean that builders developing sites of fewer than 10 homes will no longer have to make an affordable homes contribution that should instead fall to those building much larger developments.”

How the Section 106 row developed:

March 2014: The Government published a consultation proposing to scrap section 106 obligations on the provision of affordable homes for developments of 10 properties or less (5 or less in rural areas)

Rural campaigners quickly responded with warnings about the impact on affordable housing supply in rural communities

November 2014: the policy is adopted

May 2015: West Berkshire Council and Reading Borough Council launch a legal challenge against the reforms, arguing that the consultation process had been unlawful

July 2015: Justice Holgate quashes the Government policy, describing it as “unlawful” and “unfair”

The Government announces it will appeal the ruling

May 11 2016: The Court of Appeal rules in favour of the Government, restoring its changes to the section 106 regulations.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Court-ruling-housing-reforms-means-gentrification/story-29265763-detail/story.html

“Campaigners challenge Government to fulfil its pledge to strengthen neighbourhood planning”


“Campaigners are urging Government to back up its pledge to give added strength to neighbourhood planning, following a debate on the Housing and Planning Bill on Monday (9 May)

Planning minister Brandon Lewis once again rejected a Lords amendment tabled by Baroness Parminter to enable communities with a complete or emerging neighbourhood plan to appeal against decisions that conflicted with that plan. Citing his opposition to extending third party rights in the planning system, Mr Lewis achieved parliamentary support to reinstate the Government’s own amendment to support neighbourhood planning: a clause to ensure complete plans are referred to in decisions.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), Civic Voice and the National Association of Local Councils (NALC) are disappointed that the Government has established a clause that adds nothing to standard practice, but are heartened by Mr Lewis’s pledge to ‘work with colleagues to ensure that neighbourhood plans enjoy the primacy that we intend them to have in planning law’.

The groups believe that ministers can and should work with supportive Conservative MPs, such as Nick Herbert, and supportive peers to give greater weight to neighbourhood planning [1]. The groups argue that the secretary of state should incorporate the principles of a ‘neighbourhood right to be heard’, as also tabled (and subsequently withdrawn) by Baroness Parminter on Tuesday (10 May), into secondary legislation or existing planning policy. These principles could include:

a duty to have special regard to made or emerging neighbourhood development plans;
a duty to meaningfully consult the neighbourhood planning body and take account of that body’s recommendations; and
guidance on and power to call-in decisions that do not accord with the plan [2]
Neighbourhood plans represent local aspirations and have been shown to increase the number of homes planned locally [3]. The House of Lords twice voted to introduce Baroness Parminter’s amendment establishing a neighbourhood right of appeal, and the Government twice rejected it.

It has been argued by many, including some MPs, that the Government’s amendment in lieu ‘does not go far enough’ beyond existing good practice in supporting neighbourhood planning.

Sarah James, head of policy, Civic Voice, said:

“Neighbourhood plans are undermined by speculative developments, so we need a mechanism to ensure that those neighbourhood plans, once agreed or when close to agreement, are not subverted.

“Civic Voice wants to see a plan-led system, but where an application departs from a plan, the community should have the right to challenge. We will continue to campaign on this important civic movement issue”.

Matt Thomson, head of planning at CPRE, said:

“While the Government’s amendment will reduce the scope of neighbourhood plans, and thereby the confidence of communities in them, we are pleased that the minister will explore further ways to empower local people.

“Lords and MPs have done a vital job in bringing attention to this issue. It is now up to Government to prove their commitment to neighbourhood plans and afford them more weight when crucial decisions are made.”

Councillor Ken Browse, chairman, National Association of Local Councils (NALC), said:

“Neighbourhood planning is undoubtedly a positive step forward in placing more power over development in the hands of local people, but it is imperative the hard work of parish and town councils, working with their communities, and the integrity of neighbourhood plans, are not undermined.

“I look forward to working with the government and others to strengthen neighbourhood planning to ensure communities really are in the driving seat of how their places grow and develop.”

Do you want to ask the Police and Crime panel a question?

The Police and Crime Commissioner is responsible to the Police and Crime Panel. If you wish to ask them a wuestion, here is a web form:

http://www.plymouth.gov.uk/dcpcpquestions.html

“Decentralisation: Issues, Principles and Practice
University of Newcastle

“… The ad hoc, piecemeal and rapid process of decentralisation in England is generating a new institutional landscape.

Since 2010, institutions have been abolished as the regional tier was dismantled, new institutions have emerged, existing institutions reformed and new areas of public policy been brought together creating new arrangements involving Combined Authorities and LEPs with metro mayors to come as well as connections between new policy areas, for example health and social care (Figure 6). Echoing historical experience in England, this further episode of institutional churn, disruption and hiatus has reproduced many longstanding issues including loss of leadership, capacity and momentum as well as instability and uncertainty with negative impacts on growth and development.

The new institutional landscape is raising serious questions of accountability, transparency and scrutiny – the ‘achilles heel’ of decentralisation. Decisions are being made by a narrow of cadre of actors behind closed doors, involving a mix of elected politicians, appointed officials and external advisors.

Deals and deal-making are being conducted, negotiated and agreed in private by a small number of selected participants in closed and opaque circumstances and in a technocratic way. Decisions involving large sums of public money and long-term financial commitments are being taken without appropriate levels of accountability, transparency and scrutiny.

Although uneven in different places, many institutions and interests in the wider public, private and civic realms feel left out and marginalised. These include business and their representative associations (alongside the uneven involvement of LEPs), environmental organisations, further and higher education, trade unions, and the voluntary and community sector.

Equalities and representation concerns are evident in relation to gender and diversity. The wider public knows little about decentralisation of the governance system and is becoming increasingly disengaged and lacking faith in the ability of politics, public policy and institutions to make their lives better. Those better informed and engaged worry that power and control has simply shifted a little from elites in central national government to those at the local level.

Concerns that the decentralisation efforts in England failed in the early 2000s due to the limited nature of decentralisation on offer and lack of public engagement and support are mixed with fears that the current process risks repeating this mistake.

Accountabilities are lacking, weak and under-developed. Wider discussion, scrutiny and challenge by the public and/or relevant institutions have been largely absent. Anxieties are being articulated that the exclusive, opaque and technocratic way decentralisation is being conducted is reinforcing such concerns.

More inclusive, transparent and accountable ways of doing decentralisation need to be found, developed and adapted to local circumstances. Means need to be explored to allow and enable a wider set of voices to be heard and more interests and opinions considered in order to make decentralisation accountable and transparent and more sustainable.

International evidence illustrates that inclusive deliberation and dialogue supports better and more robust decision-making for public policy and more effective and lasting outcomes27. Decentralisation must not be seen as an end in itself but as a means to better economic, social and environmental outcomes for people and places across England and the UK. …”

http://www.ncl.ac.uk/curds/publications/documents/DECENTRALISATIONIssuesPrinciplesandPractice.pdf

Readers’ letters on devolution

“Your editorial (Local parties should grab the chance to reshape politics, 4 April) misses a very important trend in local government. Ordinary voters have been effectively disenfranchised by the cabinet system operated by local authorities, to the extent that dissent, even within members of majority parties, has been crushed. Residents are now looking to independent parties to represent their views in an open, non-partisan approach as illustrated by the “Flatpack Democracy” movement.

Creating even larger local government bodies, with elite “super-cabinets”, means that our rulers will be even more remote and less accountable. Promoting local government leaders to the “premier league” will have only one result: they will stop listening.
Richard Gilyead
Saffron Walden, Essex

• Imposing mayors on English cities, and the highly politicised “northern powerhouse”, are typical politicians’ solutions to their own economic failure. In sundry policy papers since the mid-80s, I sought to show that the problem with regional development is a voracious central government, as capital, income and the educated have been taxed and fiscally seduced to the south-east. The last thing we in the northern regions need is more political interventions.

Osborne is responsible for the most pernicious attack on the poorest regions, as the business rate revaluation was postponed for two years, massively subsidising London and taxing the poorest regions. Taxes continue to be applied less to profits and more to mere activity (rates, VAT, duties, unindexed capital gains), thus attacking further the poorest and subsidising the richest areas.
Rodney Atkinson
Stocksfield, Northumberland

• English devolution might transform local government leadership but it will have been diminished by the loss of its education services.
John Bailey”

http://gu.com/p/4t7v5?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Accountability: the problem

” … When a public body focuses upwards to the paymasters and policymakers, rather than downwards to the people it serves, it’s obvious who will suffer, however much the policymakers believe they have the best interests of the people at heart.

One answer is to sort out the architecture of accountability so that priorities are transparent and unchallengeable. That may matter just as much, perhaps more, than holding people to account for failings after the event. It may stop disasters happening.”

http://gu.com/p/4jvkh

Nine police forces investigating Conservative election expenses

West Mercia is to investigate the Devon and Cornwall PCC case to keep a “cordon sanitaire” around Ms Hernandez’s conflict of interest with her own chief Constable.

“Lincolnshire becomes latest force to launch inquiry into allegations that Conservatives incorrectly categorised 2015 election costs

Nine police forces have launched inquiries into whether the Conservative party breached spending rules during the 2015 general election campaign.

Lincolnshire police became the latest force to confirm on Thursday that they were investigating the claims as the Tories handed over evidence regarding the controversy to the Electoral Commission.

The allegations regarding breaches of spending rules centre on claims that the party listed the costs of bussing activists into key marginal seats under national spending accounts, rather than as local spending.

Lincolnshire appears to be the ninth police force examining the allegations, which were first broadcast by Channel 4 News. The others are Greater Manchester, Cheshire, Gloucestershire, Northamptonshire, Staffordshire, Warwickshire and West Mercia, and Devon and Cornwall.

Any candidate found guilty of an election offence could face up to one year in prison and being barred from office for three years.

A statement from Lincolnshire police said: “We are aware of recent media reporting regarding allegations of irregularities in the election expenses of the Conservative party and some of their candidates in the general election 2015, and three byelections in 2014.

“We can confirm that we are carrying out general enquiries, but we will not be commenting further until they are complete.”

The Electoral Commission went to the high court on Thursday for an information disclosure order to seek the documents.

Within hours, the commission said it had received the documents from the Conservatives and was reviewing them.

Senior Tories insisted that the legal action was not necessary as they had always intended to hand the details over.

“We advised the Electoral Commission on 29 April that we would comply with their notices by 1pm today, and have done so. There was no need for them to make this application to the high court,” a spokeswoman said.

The party acknowledged that due to an “administrative error”, some accommodation costs for the activists were not properly registered, but insisted that the bus tour was part of the national campaign organised by Conservative campaign headquarters and as such, it did not have to fall within individual constituency spending limits.”

http://nr.news-republic.com/Web/ArticleWeb.aspx?regionid=4&articleid=64278297

Moulding new Chairman of Devon County Council

How ever will he find the time to regenerate Axminster?

And remember Stuart Hughes was sacked from an EDDC committee because he was deemed “too busy” with his EDDC and DCC jobs!

Still, he has got Cloakham Lawn sorted to his satisfaction.

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Devon-County-Council-appoints-new-chairman/story-29265721-detail/story.html

Hernandez interview on Spotlight tonight as Police and Crime Committee gets special meetin

Hernandez interview announced this afternoon for this evening on the 6.30 pm edition on BBC 1. In the meantime, in spite of its Chair (Councillor Croad, Con) saying on television that he sees no reason for it, there WILL be an emergency meeting of the Police and Crime Panel, the local watchdog to which Hernandez is responsible (and which, presumably could suspend her?) within the next couple of weeks.

Members of the panel according to its website is below:

Yvonne Atkinson (Co-Optee (voting)
Councillor Stuart Barker (Committee Member)
Councillor Chris Batters (Vice-Chair)
Councillor Betty Boundy (Committee Member)
Councillor Geoff Brown (Committee Member)
Councillor Roger Croad (Chair)
Councillor Philippa Davey
Councillor Robert Excell (Committee Member)
Phil Martin (Committee Member)
Councillor John Mathews (Committee Member)
Councillor E W Moulson (Committee Member)
Councillor Vivien Pengelly
Councillor Mike Saltern (Committee Member)
Councillor Philip Sanders (Committee Member)
Mrs Margaret Squires (Committee Member)
Councillor Rachel Sutton (Committee Member)
Councillor A Toms (Committee Member)
Sarah Wafker (Co-Optee (voting))
Derris Watson (Committee Member)
Councillor Tom Wright (Committee Member)

http://www.plymouth.gov.uk/dcpcpmembership

Time to lobby?

Here is its remit:

The Police and Crime Panel supports and challenges the Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC). The panel has the power to request reports and call the PCC to attend its meetings.

Panels will not replace police authorities and will not have a role in scrutinising the performance of the police force (that is the role of the PCC).

The panel will:

review the police and crime plan and annual report
scrutinize (and potentially veto) the PCC’s proposed council tax precept* for policing
hold confirmation hearings for the PCC’s proposed appointment of a Chief Constable and senior support staff (the panel may veto the Chief Constable appointment)
scrutinise the actions and decisions of the Commissioner (but not the performance of the police force)
consider complaints against the PCC of a non-criminal nature
*the money collected from council tax for policing

Meetings are held in the Council House, Plymouth City Council, Armada Way, Plymouth.

DEFINITELY time to lobby!

“EDF says Hinkley Point cost could rise £3 billion, timing slips”

“French utility EDF (EDF.PA) warned on Thursday that the cost of building two nuclear reactors in Britain could reach nearly 21 billion pounds, about three billion more than it said in October.

The equity commitment on the Hinkley Point project includes a contingency margin which could reach 13.8 billion pounds for EDF and 6.9 billion for Chinese partner CGN, for a total of 20.7 billion pounds, EDF said in a statement ahead of its annual shareholders’ meeting.

In October, EDF put the equity financing at 12 billion and 6 billion, respectively, or 18 billion pounds.

EDF also said it would commit to provide “limited” financial guarantees to CGN, particularly in the case of cost overruns related to delays, or in the event that European authorities challenge EDF’s “Contract for Difference” negotiated with the UK government.

It did not specify the size of these guarantees.

Chief Executive Jean-Bernard Levy said that without Hinkley Point, EDF would have no credibility in trying to win other nuclear export markets.

“This project is essential for the credibility of the entire French nuclear industry,” he told shareholders.

EDF said in its statement that since signing its agreement with CGN in October, talks with CGN had continued and that it had now finalised stable contract documents.

EDF, which is 85 percent state-owned, confirmed that the projected rate of return (IRR) on Hinkley Point is estimated at around 9 percent over the life of the project.

It said every six months of delay would reduce the IRR by about 20 basis points.

“We will do everything we can to make sure there is no delay,” Levy told shareholders.

EDF also said it expects it to take 115 months (9.5 years) between a final investment decision until commissioning of the first reactor.

The final investment decision has been delayed several times. Last month, French Economy Minister Emmanuel Macron said he expected a decision by September.

This means that if the decision is taken in September, Hinkley Point would start up at the earliest in spring 2026.

In October, EDF said the first operation of Hinkley Point C was scheduled for 2025, which was already a two-year delay from its 2013 estimate for a 2023 start.

Levy also said that a planned 4 billion euro capital increase would be launched by year-end or at the start of 2017 if market conditions are favourable.”

http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/UKDomesticNews/~3/edQriui1NII/uk-edf-nuclear-britain-idUKKCN0Y30Q6

The solution for devisive politics: more independents, says EDA

“Last week, elections for Police and Crime Commissioners (P&CC) were held across the country, including ours in Devon and Cornwall.

We would be grateful if you would allow us to propose that two key lessons must be learned.

The first, sadly, is negative. After the 2012 P&CC when the turnout here was 15 per cent, the Electoral Reform Society (ERS) said: “From the start, the P&CC elections were marred by controversy, with the government shirking its responsibility to provide voters with even the most basic information that the elections were taking place.” One of the ERS’s three key recommendations was: “Never leave voters in the dark about who or what they are voting for – ensure information on candidates is provided in mailings to voters.”

Cut forward to last week, and in Devon and Cornwall the 2016 turnout was still a lowly 22.8 per cent, artificially boosted by elections held on the same day in the major settlements of Exeter and Plymouth. We consider it has greatly damaged the reputation of the Cabinet Office (that little understood organ of control at Downing Street’s right hand) that they simply refused in the four years since 2012 to implement the ERA’s urgent suggestion for even a single mailshot, and hundreds of thousands of West Country voters remained in the dark in May 2016. Why?

However, on a more hopeful theme, there is in our view an immense positive to be found.

The Conservatives polled roughly 69,000 and Labour roughly 66,000.

But the aggregate vote of the two Independent candidates (Devon’s Bob Spencer taking about 41,000 and Cornwall’s William Morris about 22,000) shows us that even at an election when the party machines were cranking hard, a similar share could be gained by two Independent individuals working entirely from their own initiative, with slim resources, and having to operate across an immense area.

The country knows that we are stuck now with an increasingly divisive party political context until the general election fixed for May 2020. However, the more extreme parts of the Conservative agenda – from academies to planning, junior doctors to refugees – are being repeatedly confronted now by collective independent voices uniting outside the parliamentary system.

Last week, in our part of the country, the South West showed that even on a low turnout, the Independent cause is more than about just protest – we too can score in substantial numbers at the ballot box.

The question we now ask the region is this: how, for the sake of the next generation do we harness all this Independent goodwill and spirit to convert sentiment into candidates and candidates up to office at county elections in 2017 and for Parliament in 2020?

It seems to us that without an organised coming together of all independent-minded reformers as soon as possible, the Conservatives will ‘get the vote out’ in 2017 and 2020 too. Surely if ever there was a time for the Independent-minded to take up the challenge, it is now.

Paul Arnott, Chairman
Ben Ingham, Leader
East Devon Alliance”

http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/in-the-press/20160512/midweek-herald-independents-need-to-take-up-challenge/

Electoral Commission takes Conservative Party to court over election expenses

“It’s awkward timing for David Cameron, who launches his anti-corruption summit today in London:

he Electoral Commission is taking the Conservative Party to the High Court over the election spending scandal.

The Mirror [ but at the instigation of Channel 4 News] revealed two months ago that at least 24 Tory MPs had help from notorious battle buses ferrying hundreds of volunteers to marginal constituencies during the 2015 general election but didn’t declare any of the spending as required by law.

Breaching spending limits is a criminal offence and could lead to calls for by-elections.

It comes at an awkward time for David Cameron, who today kicks off an anti-corruption summit in London.

The slowly-unfolding scandal has led to several MPs and one Police and Crime Commissioner coming under criminal investigation by police.

The Electoral Commission are taking the Tories to the High Court to force them to reveal documents detailing the spending on Battle Buses ahead of the 2015 general election.

The Commission have already asked the Tories twice for the documents, but they have only provided “limited” disclosure.

Political parties have a legal obligation to provide full spending disclosures to the Commission on request.

Bob Posner, Director of Party and Election Finance and Legal Counsel at the Electoral Commission said: “If parties under investigation do not comply with our requirements for the disclosure of relevant material in reasonable time and after sufficient opportunity to do so, the Commission can seek recourse through the courts.”

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/electoral-commission-takes-tories-high-7952712

Hugo Swire pictured in Cameron’s anti-corruption squad – may have to start with his own family firms

Four of the Swire family holding companies feature in the Panama Papers and Swire is in record as saying that he thinks full tax disclosures for MPs should not be required.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/12/david-camerons-anti-corruption-summit-risks-ridicule-after-it-em/

Our LEP need an “Interim Head of Strategy” – just three days to apply!

“Interim Head of Strategy and Operations
Competitive remuneration [nowhere does it mention what the actual salary is]

The Heart of the South West LEP is a strong and dynamic partnership between the private sector, local authorities, universities and further education across Somerset, Devon, Plymouth and Torbay.

We have established an impressive track record leading and influencing economic growth, job creation and prosperity across the Heart of the South West.

This is an exciting time to be joining a Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) – work is underway with our partners developing a devolution deal with Government and at the same time rolling out our pipeline of £500m of investments. Reporting to the Chief Executive, this role leads a small core team in the LEP and working collaboratively with a wide range of other staff in our partners.

As a key member of the LEP’s senior management team, the role also directs LEP strategy (and development of our LEP wide devolution productivity plan), investment programme management and ramping up our engagement and communications with stakeholders to ensure we maximise our impact whilst developing the partnerships needed to build the global distinctiveness of our economy.

The ideal candidate will have senior level experience of working collaboratively with public and private sector partners on economic development or strategic economic plans / programmes in a fast paced, high profile environment. Experience of facilitating cluster development in a similar organisation would also be an advantage.

Also sought is the ability to commence work quickly to support development work on our devolution deal; an initial contract (or secondment opportunity) for a year is on offer.

Please provide your CV and details of remuneration or daily rate sought, by email to janet.powell@heartofswlep.co.uk.

Closing date: 15 May 2016
The LEP follows Somerset County Council Equalities Policies”

Just one domino has to fall …

It is being said by developers that Brexit would lead to a shortage of construction staff which, in turn, would lead to a shortage of homes being built. There is now also a recession in the British manufacturing sector.

What developers don’t go on to say is that both these situations would lead to higher house prices due to short supply and so Local Plans would be in tatters.

We banged on about Local Plans assuming that there would never be a recession, never be a shortage of workers (indeed there would be a constant increase) and no shortage of materials. Just this one change would mean Local Plans would be worthless.

What happens then?

Germany had so much renewable energy recently it had to pay customers to use it!

“Power prices [in Germany] went negative for a few hours, paying industrial consumers. Renewable energy generation hit a high in Germany Sunday, with commercial power consumers being paid to use electricity for a few hours.

Around midday the country’s wind, solar, hydro and biomass plants were supplying 87% of the power being consumed in Germany, according to a report by Quartz.

Germany’s renewable energy mix was 33% last year and is expected to climb this year due to new wind power generation, as the country looks to convert to 100% renewable energy by 2050.

The power surplus may have been good for consumers, but power suppliers suffered, according to Quartz. While some gas power plants were taken offline, other plants—such as nuclear and coal—couldn’t shut down as quickly, so industrial customers were earning money as they used electricity.”

Germany Had So Much Renewable Energy It Had to Pay Customers to Use It

EDF sales and output fall as AGM looms

“French energy giant EDF says sales fell 7% in the first three months of the year in the face of stiff competition, a mild winter and lower energy prices.

The figures come ahead of Wednesday’s AGM where investors will quiz management over their plans for the Hinkley Point nuclear plant in the UK.
EDF, 85% controlled by the French state, has struggled to find the cash for its 66.5% stake in the project.

In April it pushed a final decision on the £18bn plant back to September.
Chief financial officer Thomas Piquemal resigned in April following an internal disagreement over whether to press on with the controversial project.

However, EDF has outlined plans to raise €4bn, with up to €3bn provided by the French government.

Tough markets

Credit rating agencies are due to assess the group in the coming days and their verdict on its finances will determine how easy it will be for the group to raise cash.

Meanwhile, tough market conditions mean EDF is cutting costs and planning to sell €10bn in assets by 2020, including a stake in French power-grid operator RTE.

On Tuesday the new chief financial officer Xavier Girre, said the management was not considering spinning off any part of the group to raise money.
Its latest earnings report shows it has reduced its target for 2016 nuclear output to 408-412 terawatt-hour from 410-415.

The scaling down of its output reflects continuing problems at its Paluel nuclear facility in France where a steam generator collapsed during maintenance.

Sales fell 7% to €21.4bn in the first three months of the year, with sales in the UK down 9.8%.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36262029

A new trend: city parish councils

” … With city residents being increasingly affected by public sector cuts, this may encourage more city-based councils to hold referendums to create new parishes. The appeal of a grassroots local government making decisions – even in urban areas – is that decisions are made for the community, by the very people who live within it. “Having local governors also enforces the view that the council really cares,” says Ball. …”

http://gu.com/p/4jv2n?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other