“Broadband a question of haves and havenots”, Councillor Twiss told EDDC Scrutiny.

Report sent to East Devon Watch:

‘More ‘best practice’ was evident at EDDC Scrutiny Committee at Knowle yesterday evening (12/11/2015). From the start, Chair Roger Giles (Independent, Ottery St Mary) insisted that presentations should be brief and not include the reading out of information that had been circulated to councillors in advance. Using questions and answers was a more useful tool for this committee , he advised.
This proved correct straightaway, in the close examination of Devon’s broadband provision. Five stakeholders had been called to speak and answer questions. They were Andrew Moulding, Chair of Devon County Council’s (DCC) Place Scrutiny Committee and Deputy Leader of East Devon District Council (EDDC); Cllr Phil Twiss, EDDC Corporate Services portfolio holder; Paul Coles, BT Regional Manager, South West ; Phil Roberts, Programme Manager for superfast broadband delivery, Connecting Devon & Somerset (CDS) ; and Graham Long, Upottery Parish Councillor, with 20 years’ experience with Hewlett Packard, for whom he ran the EU support network.

Questions included one sent, in her absence, from Cllr Susie Bond (Independent, Feniton & Buckerell), asking why the broadband situation in parts of her constituency was “appalling”. Particularly intense questioning came from Cllrs Marianne Rixson (Independent, Sidmouth Sidford Ward ) , and Val Ranger (Independent, Newton Poppleford & Harpford),who had clearly done their homework, both closely referring to the document submitted by CDS, and finding some apparent inaccuracies (e.g. Could the audit done by EDDC’s internal auditors, SWAP, properly be described as ‘independent’?). Cllr Ranger wondered why, of 26 interested parties in 2014, only two had submitted a formal tender.
Phil Roberts (CDS) reported that CDS had decided not to sign a second contact with BT, and that there would now be a different approach to tendering . For the next phase, CDS were currently looking at other providers , as well as talking to BT, he said.

Much of the time, Cllrs Moulding and Twiss looked uncomfortably out of their depth, not least when it emerged that EDDC and DCC had not worked together to obtain maximum funding, thereby missing out on millions of pounds.

Graham Long, “astonished to find how slow broadband is in Devon”, explained that “Fibre is best for reliability, speed and bandwidth. But fibre-to-cabinet works as an urbancentric solution. It doesn’t work in rural areas”. Cllr Ben Ingham (Independent, Woodbury & Lympstone) told the Committee, “I’m really flabbergasted that BT are picking the poor relation of technology”.

The broadband issue is certain to continue. Next Monday DCC’s Place Scrutiny Committee will hear CDS feedback on its recommendations (14h00, County Hall, Exeter). More questions and answers are no doubt being prepared!’

Somerset council cuts catastrophic

Westcountry council has frozen ‘non-essential’ spending saying their financial situation is even worse than anticipated and it is ‘living beyond its means.’

In an email sent to staff, Somerset County Council chief executive Pat Flaherty blamed austerity measures for a projected overspend, adding the authority could not cut into reserves which were already at the absolute minimum.

He said that as a result, vacancies would not be filled unless absolutely necessary, buildings would be maintained to the bare, safe minimum standards and other measures would be taken in non-statutory areas.

Unions have reacted angrily to the move, saying they’re is ‘no more meat on the bone’ in the authority which has had to cut £100million from its budget in four years.

In his email, which has been seen by the Western Morning News, Mr Flaherty said it was no secret that setting the budget was going to be hard.

However, he added: “Over the recent months and weeks the detail of just how difficult it is going to be has got clearer.

“Sadly, the clearer the picture gets, the worse it looks.

“We all know the root causes of this – continued austerity and ever growing demand on our services, especially those for vulnerable children and adults.”

Mr Flaherty said “the fact is we are continuing to live beyond our means” and unless “we turn a corner on spending” the council will be up to £8 million overspent by the end of the year.

He said: ” This would be unacceptable as it would deplete our already minimal reserves. We therefore need to take urgent action on the spend that we do have control over.”

He said he knew the step would not be popular and praised the work of staff that doesn’t readily fit under the heading of a statutory service.

“What I am saying does not devalue that work, it simply accepts the painful reality that this council has to reduce its spending immediately if we are to be able to fulfil our statutory requirements to support the most vulnerable people in our communities,” said.

Oliver Foster-Burnell, regional organiser for Unison, said areas like services for the homeless were already suffering.

“Here in Somerset the County Council have just announced proposals that are set to see £900,000 removed from funding given to homeless services, the impact of that on the local community will be huge and costs will be felt by other authorities like the police and social Services.”

He said that the council’s announcement means that it will now look closely at how it responds to things that it regards as non-essential services across the County.

“There is just no more meat that can come off the bone here in Somerset,” he said.

“Our members have seen restructures, redundancies, changes in working practices and our message to Government is that enough is enough.

“The council has stated it is set to overspend by £7 million, its overspend within other areas like children’s social care is set to reach £11 million by the end of this financial year and the council is already using its reserves to pay for that.”

In a statement issued to the WMN, Mr Flaherty said he had make sure the council balanced its books.

“We have to legally, and this is very difficult when our funding is being cut so dramatically and there is more demand for what we do.”

He said any overspend would cut away at reserves, which were already at the minimum recommended for a council of its size and budget.

“That minimum is there for a reason and I cannot put this authority in a position where it does not have the ability to respond to unforeseen costs.”

He said that while funding was falling, the demand for services was increasing.

“Demographic pressure alone is going to add around £5m to our costs next year alone,” said Mr Flaherty.

“Living within our means is challenging but it’s something we have to do.”

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/West-council-freezes-spending-saying-living-means/story-28169728-detail/story.html

How do you lose nearly £4 million in expenditure? Easy if you are EDDC!

Page 9 – Annual Audit Letter from Grant Thornton:

We identified two adjustments affecting the Council’s reported financial position. The draft financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2015 presented for audit recorded net expenditure of £13.757m. Following the agreed audit adjustments, the audited financial statements showed net expenditure of £17.641m. The changes related to:

• reversal of upward revaluation of £1.546m to assets under construction which actually related to additions which had already been accounted for; and

• reversal of upward revaluation of infrastructure assets of £2.338m in year as the Code states such assets should be carried at historical cost and not fair value.

Click to access 191115-combined-agenda-a-and-g.pdf

Well spotted Grant Thornton!

Staff allowed judicial review of downgrade of their hospital

“Irwin Mitchell lawyer Mathieu Culverhouse said: “Concerned members of staff at Wythenshawe Hospital truly believe that the loss of specialist status will have a catastrophic impact on the hospital’s ability to deliver quality care to patients and we are delighted that the decision not to award specialist status to Wythenshawe Hospital will now be reviewed.

“It is vital that decisions of this nature, which affect the health services available to the public of Greater Manchester, are made properly and in accordance with the law and we are determined to ensure that the decision making process is given the appropriate scrutiny by the court.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=25101:court-gives-permission-for-judicial-review-challenge-over-hospital-downgrade&catid=174&Itemid=99

The health trust had already allocated £500,000 towards funding any challenge to their plans.

“The legal appeal by the Keep Wythenshawe Special group is being self-funded through personal contributions by staff at Wythenshawe hospital, along with former patients and their families and local people in Wythenshawe.”

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/judge-grants-judicial-review-campaigners-10418635

Why we need the Freedom of Information Act

It isn’t perfect but it is all we have – and MPs and civil servants want to take it away from us:

Sir Jeremy Heywood, Britain’s top civil servant, who wants to limit our Freedom of Information Act, though his plans have been greeted with incredulity and derision even within government.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3316327/Sir-Cover-plot-kill-right-know-expose-public-sector-fat-cats-impossible-without-Freedom-Information-Act-No-wonder-Whitehall-s-cynical-mandarin-wants-rid-it.html

What happened when a Devon river was polluted by slurry

“Toothless Environment Agency is allowing the living world to be wrecked with impunity”

” … The Environment Agency no longer prosecutes even some of the most extreme pollution events. In 2013, a farmer in Somerset released what the agency called a “tsunami of slurry” into the Wellow Brook. One inspector said it was the worst pollution she had seen in 17 years. But the agency dithered for a year before striking a private agreement with the farmer, allowing him to avoid possible prosecution, criminal record, massive fine and court costs, by giving £5,000 to a local charity.

New rules imposed by the government means that such under-the-counter deals, which now have a name of their own – enforcement undertakings – are likely to become more common. They are a parody of justice: arbitrary, opaque and wide open to influence-peddling, special pleading and corruption.”

http://gu.com/p/4e5jg

116 Labour council leaders demand 1-to-1 meetings with Cameron and his advisers

“The mass letter-writing tactic is aimed at ensuring that Mr Cameron is not offering any ‘special favours’ to his own council to cushion the impact of Treasury cuts.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/11/12/david-camerons-hypocrisy-_n_8544624.html

Rich Hampstead residents raising large sums for their personal Met police officers

Hampstead is one of the richest boroughs in London, where – as in many other places – crime has fallen. The police would be employed by the Metropolitan Police but work only in the one borough. As of this morning pledges of £180,000 for each year had been made – enough for 3 officers – but more money is rolling in each hour from a crowd funding site.

The head of Met Police is said to have announced that he can see problems but is currently open-minded about the idea.

“Jessica Learmond-Criqui, who chairs the Frognal and Fitzjohns Safer neighbourhood panel, still hopes to secure a total of £600,000 over three years to fund five PCs and a Sergeant dedicated to Hampstead.”

http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/crime-court/fund_your_own_police_plan_in_hampstead_attracts_180k_pledges_in_four_weeks_1_4299030

Cameron offers Oxfordshire council leader fast access to no 10 advisers

“David Cameron has been accused of offering a Conservative council chief special access to No 10 advisers as a way to resolve a disagreement about proposed budget cuts.

The prime minister is facing questions about his conduct after he wrote to Ian Hudspeth, the leader of Oxfordshire county council, chastising him for considering cuts to day centres, libraries and museums. Cameron’s own constituency of Witney falls within the area.

In the letter, Cameron extended an offer for how to help to manage the cuts, saying he would be happy to “initiate a dialogue” with the No 10 policy unit about the possibilities of devolution deals and suggesting that Hudspeth contact his aide Sheridan Westlake, who used to work in the Department for Communities and Local Government.”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/nov/11/david-cameron-offered-oxfordshire-council-leader-access-to-advisers

When is an advertisement not an advertisement?

Tighter rules on local authority publications state that

” the new rules would define ‘appropriate use of publicity’ in relation to council newspapers and use of lobbyists: Advertising should be balanced, factually accurate and not likely to be perceived by the public as a political statement or a commentary on contentious areas of public policy.”

In the current edition of its online newspaper for councillors, the Knowledge, there is an article about “The Earth Centre” at Bicton which states: “The Earth Centre at Bicton College offers a unique event, conferencing and meeting venue located in the
heart of the beautiful East Devon countryside but within a short distance of Exeter. The venue acts as an 80 seat auditorium, 50 seat seminar room with external breakout area, or an open space to use as you please. It also has an additional private meeting room for up to 12 people, free car parking facilities for 60 vehicles, catering facilities, WIFI, audio and projector screens”.

Did they pay for this puff job one wonders? Isn’t the Bicton area, much of it owned by Clinton Devon Estates which wants to see housing there, a “contentious area of public policy”?

Or is it a pre-emptive strike for another East Devon District Council satellite office!

37,000 could end up in NHS care when care homes forced to close

Several towns in East Devon rely on care homes for many jobs. Most advertisements in local newspapers are for jobs in the sector. The increase in minimum wage and lower social care fees will cause many care homes to close. The closure of more community hospital beds will exacerbate the problem. Councils facing budget cuts of 40% cannot pick up any slack.

“The NHS could be forced to find room for 37,000 elderly and disabled nursing home residents by the end of the decade as the cash-starved care industry teeters on the brink of collapse, a new report warns.
A study of funding by the think-tank ResPublica concluded that a feared wave of care home closures and cutbacks could leave the NHS forced to pick up a bill of £3 billion a year.

The health budget has been given special protection from austerity cuts for the last five years but councils, which have a legal duty to provide social care, have seen their incomes slashed by 40 per cent. …”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/elder/11987364/NHS-facing-37000-strong-influx-of-elderly-as-care-homes-close.html

David Cameron in denial about cuts – here’s the proof

“… In leaked correspondence with the Conservative leader of Oxfordshire county council (which covers his own constituency), David Cameron expresses his horror at the cuts being made to local services. This is the point at which you realise that he has no conception of what he has done.

The letters were sent in September, but came to light only on Friday, when they were revealed by the Oxford Mail. The national media has been remarkably slow to pick the story up, given the insight it offers into the prime minister’s detachment from the consequences of his actions.

Cameron complains that he is “disappointed” by the council’s proposals “to make significant cuts to frontline services – from elderly day centres, to libraries, to museums. This is in addition to the unwelcome and counter-productive proposals to close children’s centres across the county.” Why, he asks, has Oxfordshire not focused instead on “making back-office savings”? Why hasn’t it sold off its surplus property? After all, there has been only “a slight fall in government grants in cash terms”. Couldn’t the county “generate savings in a more creative manner”?

Explaining the issue gently, as if to a slow learner, the council leader, Ian Hudspeth, points out that the council has already culled its back-office functions, slashing 40% of its most senior staff and 2,800 jobs in total, with the result that it now spends less on these roles than most other counties. He explains that he has already flogged all the property he can lay hands on, but would like to remind the prime minister that using the income from these sales to pay for the council’s running costs “is neither legal, nor sustainable in the long-term since they are one-off receipts”.

As for Cameron’s claim about government grants, Hudspeth comments: “I cannot accept your description of a drop in funding of £72m or 37% as a ‘slight fall’.”

Again and again, he exposes the figures the prime minister uses as wildly wrong. For example, Cameron claims that the cumulative cuts in the county since 2010 amount to £204m. But that is not the cumulative figure; it is the annual figure. Since 2010, the county has had to save £626m. It has done so while taking on new responsibilities, and while the population of elderly people and the numbers of children in the social care system have boomed. Now there is nothing left to cut except frontline services.

… It’s worth remembering that Oxfordshire, which is run by Conservatives, is among the wealthiest counties in England, with the nation’s lowest level of unemployment. In common with every aspect of austerity, the cuts have fallen hardest on those least able to weather them: local authorities in the most deprived parts of the country.

As a report commissioned by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation discovered, the cuts in some areas are so extreme that local authority provision is now being reduced to little more than social care, child protection and other core services, while the budgets for libraries, museums, galleries, sports facilities, small parks and playgrounds, children’s centres, youth clubs, after-school and holiday clubs, planning and environmental quality have already been slashed to the point at which these can barely function.

In July, the Financial Times revealed that the funding for children’s centres across England has been cut by 28% in just three years: is Cameron unaware of this? As for public protection, it is all but gone. Visits to workplaces by health and safety inspectors have fallen by 91% in four years, and have been abandoned altogether by 53 local authorities. If you want to endanger your workers, don’t mind us. You begin to see how the government’s agendas mesh.

Now, as there is nothing else left to cut, the attack turns to social care, with untold consequences for children, the elderly and people who have mental health problems.

And we are only halfway through the government’s elective, unwarranted austerity programme. The spending review this month will demand even greater cuts from budgets that have already been comprehensively fleeced. How will this be possible without dismantling the basic functions of the state?

The government justifies its austerity programme on the grounds of responsibility: people must take responsibility for their own lives, rather than relying on the state; local authorities must take responsibility for their spending. But, as Cameron’s letter shows, he takes no responsibility for his own policies. Like pain, responsibility is to be applied selectively.”

George Monbiot

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/11/david-cameron-letter-cuts-oxfordshire

Exmouth: re/de/generation

” … The legal procedures underway with tenants form part of this ongoing regeneration process.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Exmouth-action-group-criticise-new-EDDC-planning/story-28149375-detail/story.html

Regeneration: another word for “aren’t we clever – we call it “ongoing regeneration” and then we can do anything we like”.

You have only until tomorrow to (attempt to) shape EDDC services

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/consultation-and-surveys/moving-and-improving-consultation/

But best guess is Devon and Somerset devolution and “greater Exeter” trumps our wishes!

Plans for referendum on extra council tax for policing dropped

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/PCC-drops-plans-council-tax-rise-following-delays/story-28147650-detail/story.html

Mr Hogg has said that the social media outcry and mistakes made government accountants about how much will be lost has caused his change of mind.

Many social media comments were on the lines of: “why don’t we just get rid of you and your very expensive staff” and ” if there is a mistake in the accounting, how can we trust government information anyway”!

According to research by The Taxpayers Alliance:

Total spending across all OPCCs in 2013-14 was £52 million, equivalent to the starting pay of over 2,200 Constables and

Devon and Cornwall OPCC and West Midlands OPCC both had 7 staff whose role is to promote the OPCC.

https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/taxpayersalliance/pages/5606/attachments/original/1438848618/PCC_research_note.pdf?1438848618

Cranbrook says no to gypsies and travellers

” … As part of that consultation, Cranbrook Town Council made it clear that it did not want the provision of a new site for gypsies and travellers in the new town.

In a formal response Cranbrook Town Council clerk Nick Randle said Cranbrook is “not suitable” as it is subject to “strategic allocations for residential development.”

Read more: http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Plans-large-traveller-site-Cranbrook-criticised/story-28146597-detail/story.html

Welcome to our world Cranbrook, now “flavour of the month” has worn off, where it doesn’t matter diddly-squat what you think or what you want – where “consultation” is pointless and where your district councillors and officers ride rough-shod over you.

And show us anywhere in East Devon that DOESN’T have “strategic allocations for residential development”!

But we can be fairly certain that travellers won’t be sited in Whimple!

Think tank says economic growth being forfeited in favour of elderly

If economic growth is being sacrificed as this article implies, where does that put our Local Plan where it is the be-all-and-end-all of it? With no money for infrastructure who will live on new estates with no road connections to employment areas? Who will buy the houses? Who will be able to afford them? Where will the jobs come from with the wages high enough to pay for the houses that young people can’t afford to buy or rent?

” … The Resolution Foundation calculates that, from 2010 to 2019, the budgets for current spending will have been cut by 75% at the Department of Transport, by 64% at the Department for Communities and Local Government and by 53% at the Department for Business. Capital spending is not included in the calculations. By contrast, the NHS budget will have risen by 14% over the same period and the international development budget increased by 40%.

The thinktank questioned whether politicians had thought sufficiently about the reshaping of the state brought about by the mix of cuts and the protections provided to specific departments and age groups.

The foundation said: “While the focus of the autumn statement will largely be on how the pain of spending cuts has been spread around departments – as well as any changes to tax credit reforms – it’s important to step back and consider what the chancellor’s plan means for the long-term role of the state and the support it provides across different parts of the population”.

The thinktank found a growing generational divide since the financial crash, with average spending per head set to fall by 7% for children and 9% among working age adults.

In contrast, spending per capita on older people will rise by about 19% over the same period. By the end of this decade, spending on the state pension will account for more than half of all welfare spending. This is despite the big shift in welfare spending towards pensioners being cushioned to some extent by significant increases in the state pension age since 2010, culminating in a rise to 66 for men and women in 2020.

Continued demographic changes post-2020 are likely to exacerbate the shift in welfare spending towards elderly people.”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/nov/09/george-osborne-skews-spending-towards-health-and-elderly-people

The end of social housing and the welfare state?

” … The housing and planning bill, now in the Commons, is designed to finish off social renting. It carries out the manifesto pledge of a right to buy housing association properties at heavy discounts. Local authorities have to sell their most valuable homes to pay towards that discount – so two social homes are lost for every one sold.

Council and housing association rents are cut by 1%, which sounds good but the Institute for Fiscal Studies says it helps very few of the 3.9 million social tenants: it just comes off their housing benefit. But it’s a bonus for the Treasury, taking £1.7bn off the housing benefit bill by leaving a disastrous hole in council and housing-association finances: they will build 14,000 fewer homes to rent. Borrowing to build will be harder, as this loss of rent caused Moody’s to downgrade housing associations’ credit ratings. The FT reports that, as a result of the rent cut, council plans to build 5,448 homes were cancelled instantly.

…For every nine social homes sold off, only one has been built. “Get Britain building,” Cameron said, but few expect those million homes he promised. Housing is at the root of all good social policy. Good jobs, better education, decent communities, children at home in secure families – all depend on somewhere permanent and decent to live. Macmillan knew it, yet Cameron has abandoned it.”

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/10/housing-target-david-cameron-dismantling-welfare-state

Leaked letter: more bed closures for local community hospitals

A leaked letter has revealed that hospital bed closures are planned for Sidmouth, Seaton, Honiton and Ottery.
The closures are said to be temporary and part of a 15-bed package also affecting community hospitals in Exmouth and Exeter.
Sidmouth, Seaton and Honiton will each see two beds close, whilst the figure is three for Ottery, the letter reveals.
In addition, the Minor Injuries Unit in Sidmouth will also close temporarily.
Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust (NDHT), which manages the hospitals, did not inform Pulman’s View, but the details are in a leaked letter to stakeholders, dated November 2nd.
NDHT Chief Executive Dr Alison Diamond wrote: “We have had a spending limit (cap) on the amount of our budget that we can spend on agency staff imposed.
“We do not have permission to breach this limit and therefore were required to consider how we temporarily reconfigure our services in the safest possible way.
“Our approach was to explore only those proposals that maintained quality of care, addressed the risks of over-reliance on agency staff and which had the least impact on patients and our clinical workforce.
“It is important to note that these are temporary and urgent, in that they will be reversed in March 2016 and that we continue to recruit to our vacant clinical posts.
“So far the trust has spent £5million on nursing agency in six months, compared to £6million for the whole of last year.
“Our agency hotspots are mostly in the community hospitals.”
The most recent agency nurse figure for Sidmouth Hospital, for example, is 27.32 per cent.
The Chief Executive also said: “We would have preferred to have been able to involve you far more in the discussions about the safest way to maintain these services.
“However, the cap is being imposed from the middle of November and this means we must take emergency and temporary measures to address the safety concerns as well as ensuring we are not penalised for breaching the agency cap.”
Axminster GP Dr James Vann said he was not impressed by the decision when asked for comment.
Dr Vann played a leading role in pressure groups fighting the recent and much-publicised in-patient bed closures at Axminster Hospital.
He said: “We have heard this all before. NDHT does not make temporary cuts.
“In my opinion, previously they have been part of a closure campaign. “The sooner NDHT stops meddling with our community services in East Devon the better.
“I hope that the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) will be more active in controlling the actions of this provider.
“NDHT has known for the past two years that recruitment is difficult. “They worked closely with a group in Axminster to try and improve recruitment and were successful to the degree that Axminster Hospital nearly reopened, finding 10 new whole time equivalent nurses in three months.
“They have failed to learn from this experience and are now back again having to employ excessive numbers of agency nurses and spending more than most trusts on agency nursing.
“Closing beds is a panic measure being undertaken by the trust and certainly at this time of year cannot be in the patient’s best interest. “Please can the CCG try to accelerate the start of their new chosen provider, the Royal Devon & Exeter Trust.”
Dr Alison Diamond, chief executive, said: “We are working with the CCG and RD&E to look at whether alternative options are available. Our priority is to provide safe and effective care as well as resilient services for patients.”

http://www.otterystmary-today.co.uk/article.cfm?id=101434