“Councils demand reassurance on universal broadband pledge”


Councils have urged the government to “reaffirm its commitment” to a minimum broadband speed to stop thousands of homes and businesses falling into a “digital twilight zone”.

The Local Government Association called for a “timetable for action”, saying it was “paramount” to press on with extending broadband to all of the UK.
Ministerial changes after the Brexit vote must not delay work, it added.

The government insisted it was on track with its broadband coverage plans.
The promise to give every household a legal right to high-speed broadband was announced in the Queen’s Speech in May, as part of measures to make the UK a “world leader in the digital economy”.

The government expects an initial minimum speed of at least 10 Mbps (megabits per second) by 2020 under the new “broadband universal service obligation” (USO).

The pledge is included in the Digital Economy Bill, which will also include powers to direct Ofcom to regularly review the speed provided to ensure it is “still sufficient for modern life”.

Council leaders said they supported the creation of a national minimum broadband speed, but called for a “safety net” for those who were unlikely to be covered by the plan.

The government plans to set a reasonable cost threshold above which the remotest properties could be expected to contribute to the cost of their connection.

Mark Hawthorne, from the Local Government Association (LGA), said good digital connectivity was “a vital element of everyday life”, and key to the economy.

A minimum speed was “a good start”, but it must keep pace with national average speeds, especially at peak times, he stressed.

“Without this there is the real possibility of some areas – particularly in rural and hard-to-reach areas – falling into a digital twilight zone.”
The LGA’s call comes a day after Ofcom announced proposals to make BT’s Openreach division a distinct and legally separate company from BT to ensure “faster, more reliable broadband.”

But Ofcom stopped short of calling for Openreach – which runs the UK’s broadband infrastructure – to be spilt off entirely.

Responding to the LGA’s intervention, Digital Minister Matt Hancock said nine out of 10 UK homes and businesses could already get superfast broadband, and Britain was on target to reach 95% coverage by the end of next year.

Fast and reliable broadband was “a must these days”, he added, saying the bill to make the minimum speed requirement law was currently going through Parliament.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36900892

MD of Butlins warns of seaside degeneration and youth unemployment

“In her first speech as prime minister, Theresa May set out her goals to tackle the social injustices faced by many, including the working-class young. One to add to the list is that of young people who come from our coastal and seaside towns.

The UK’s coastline is 7,700 miles (12,400km) long and contributes hugely to our cultural wellbeing. Some 250 million visits are made to the coast each year but it is an inconvenient fact that if you come from our seaside towns you are more likely to be poorly educated, unemployed, unemployable, lacking in ambition, claiming benefits and living in multiple-occupation housing.

This is largely down to the long-term decline of fishing, agriculture and tourism — the industries that traditionally supported coastal communities. Tourism could arrest that decline if government helped to create the environment to allow businesses to do so. Although tourism is the UK’s sixth largest export earner and employs nearly 10 per cent of the working population, it could do better.

A recent survey found that more than half of the British public have not visited the seaside in the past three years, 30 per cent have not visited as an adult and 65 per cent believe the seaside is run down and in need of investment.

This is why the British Hospitality Association has come up with a plan to revive these communities. The first step is to appoint a seaside tsar, someone to co-ordinate government and local authority spending. This person, who needs to be strong enough to make a real difference, would oversee the creation of coastal enterprise zones to bring in investment and encourage businesses to move to the coast.

The second initiative is to create a tax environment that encourages people to visit and coastal businesses to invest in themselves. The obvious incentive for visitors is a reduction in tourism VAT — on accommodation and visitor attractions. UK visitors are taxed harder than almost everyone else in Europe for simply going on holiday. Our tourism VAT rate is a punitive 20 per cent while the average in Europe is half that.

If Mrs May is serious about rebalancing the economy, tourism is one industry that can deliver export growth by creating a seaside that is worth going back to.”

Dermot King is managing director of Butlins and chairman of the Cut Tourism VAT Campaign

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/comment/our-seaside-towns-need-a-serious-economic-boost-8n9550crk

EDDC – Exmouth: searching questions about relationship with former ” preferred partner”

“Dear East Devon District Council,

I make this request under the FOI Act and Environmental regs

We have learned from local press reports that EDDC has ended the status of Moirai Capital Investments as preferred partner in relation to the regeneration of Exmouth.

Has council made any payments to Moirai, or any agent on their behalf (JLL?) and if so, what are the details.

What meetings have been held with Moirai or any of it’s agents and what officer time or other costs have been incurred. Full details please , to include dates, place of meeting and officers/members meeting.

Is it correct that EDDC has been taking councillors (and any others e.g regeneration panel members) to view Moirai’s Swindon operation? Full details please.

When did EDDC decide to end it’s preferred partner relationship with Moirai and why? please supply full reasons and dates with copies of reports and decisions .

Please explain what has changed, other than the passage of time, that necessitates a rethink on regeneration proposals.

Please ensure that the fullest details are given in response together with copies of all relevant paperwork, emails etc.”

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/payments_to_moirai_capital_inves

How to fail better in public services – be more honest and avoid superficial solutions

“The government must stop reaching for superficial solutions when explaining the failure of public services, according to an Institute for Government report released today.

In Failing Well, the Institute of Government analyses why organisations fail and makes recommendations on how to minimise the impact if and when things go wrong.

The report points to a raft of high-profile public service failures, such as Rotherham child services and Mid-Staffordshire Foundation Trust.

Within these and other examples, the institute found that cultures of denial, weak accountability and dysfunctional mechanisms for identifying failure “inhibited an effective response”.

It concluded that warning signs are often missed and that politicians routinely use “stock responses” to explain failures instead of seeking the root cause of the problem. …

… it was shown that the turnaround in performance [in case studies] was thanks to more honest reporting cultures, strong peer involvement, reinvigorated leadership and a shared ownership of failure. The tendency to restructure or lay blame, which is a standard organisational response to failure, was avoided. …

… “Failure is an ever-present threat in our public services – and the risks are increasing. Yet there are good and bad ways of responding to failure. Politicians too often use a superficial set of tools – restructuring a service or parceling out blame.

“But this won’t solve the problem: leadership, collaboration and transparency will,” she added. “Those overseeing turnarounds also need to hold their nerve and accept that performance can dip further as recovery begins.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/07/government-must-learn-fail-better-says-institute

Wainhomes Axminster: EDDC considers legal action to recover

Serious problems in Axminster, according to this week’s View from Axminster:

image

where the newspaper reveals that EDDC is considering taking legal action to recover more than £650,000 from Wainhomes, developer at Millbrook Meadows off Chard Road. The money is due under a Section 106 agreement to cover infrastructure, new school places, sports facilities, play areas, sewerage network and public art. In addition there are safety concerns about fencing and subsidence.

In an editorial on page 3 of the newspaper it is also noted that there are serious concerns about the quality of new housing in Axminster and an anecdotal story of a house under construction having been pulled down overnight.

Wainhomes have been at the centre of a number of controversies, not least in nearby Feniton, where required flood defences were not constructed and planning conditions not met when a new housing estate was built in the village and where the company attempted to build many more houses than those originally sought.

Yet another headache for the new Axminster Regeneration Board, headed by Councillor Moulding.

South-West MPs much more worried about devolution deal than councillors or LEP

“Devon and Somerset councils are reaching a critical stage in their bid for devolved powers, as they decide whether or not to accept a new combined authority model.

All 17 councils involved in the joint devolution bid are required to vote on the proposals, before leaders can progress with negotiations over the summer. It is hoped this could see a deal announced in time for the Autumn statement – but there are concerns among MPs that the current bid lacks clarity.

South West Devon MP Gary Streeter, said he and fellow MPs “greatly recognise and applaud” the work that Devon and Somerset councils have put in so far. But at the moment they have “more questions than answers”. “I think over the next two to three months, when we sit down with the new secretary of state and council leaders, we’re looking for those questions to be answered,” he said. “This is not the fault of the councils, it’s the fault of Government [that] it is still slightly vague and up in the air. “We’re not hostile, we’re just cautious at this stage, and want these questions to be answered. “We want more information about what the benefits will be to our constituents.”

To date, the Conservative Government has awarded 12 devolution deals to cities and regions across the UK. These have passed down greater control over a range of local services, including public health, transport and education.

Devon and Somerset councils collaborated with local national parks, CCGs and the Heart of the South West (HotSW) LEP to submit a joint bid in February. And following their most recent meeting with former local government secretary Greg Clark, they seem optimistic they will secure a deal. However, any progress rests on the individual district, unitary and county councils supporting the creation of a new combined authority (CA) for the region.

The proposal has already been voted through by a number of local authorities – including Exeter, Plymouth and Somerset – with Devon County Council due to vote on Thursday.

Somerset County Council leader John Osman believes the CA model present a far more suitable option than the alternative of a directly elected mayor. And he wants to clarify that it “will not take any powers or responsibilities” from the existing councils. “There is no appetite for a directly elected mayor in the Devon and Somerset area, so the Government have asked for an alternative,” he said.

“What [the combined authority] means is a board with one representative from every one of the 17 councils, the NHS and national parks, who will decide on the new powers and new responsibilities given. “It wont be a new bureaucracy or anything like that, [and] it wont be a massive committee of everybody. It will be 23 people around the room, one from each authority.”

If the proposals are accepted, Devon and Somerset will become the first region to receive devolved powers through a non-mayoral CA model. However, any progress rests on the individual district, unitary and county councils supporting the creation of a new combined authority (CA) for the region.

The proposal has already been voted through by a number of local authorities – including Exeter, Plymouth and Somerset – with Devon County Council due to vote on Thursday.

Somerset County Council leader John Osman believes the CA model present a far more suitable option than the alternative of a directly elected mayor. And he wants to clarify that it “will not take any powers or responsibilities” from the existing councils. “There is no appetite for a directly elected mayor in the Devon and Somerset area, so the Government have asked for an alternative,” he said. “What [the combined authority] means is a board with one representative from every one of the 17 councils, the NHS and national parks, who will decide on the new powers and new responsibilities given. “It wont be a new bureaucracy or anything like that, [and] it wont be a massive committee of everybody. It will be 23 people around the room, one from each authority.”

If the proposals are accepted, Devon and Somerset will become the first region to receive devolved powers through a non-mayoral CA model.

Leaders are hoping that all councils will be on side with the proposals by the end of July, to enable them to start further negotiations with Whitehall over the summer. Their next aim is to have a draft deal from the Government for local authorities to vote on by the end of October. They believe this could lead to an official deal being announced in November’s Autumn Statement.

Councillor Osman admits that the recent cabinet reshuffle – which saw Greg Clark replaced by Sajid Javid – has created some uncertainty. But he says it remains his ambition “to get a deal done and dusted by November time”. “We are now getting into contact with the new secretary of state and the chancellor to say we are still on track and working with civil servants,” he said. “We need to hear back from them to ensure they are still carrying on with the previous administrations line. “I can’t think why he wouldn’t to be honest, it was a conservative policy. But we’ve made contact and we’ve just got it wait for a response.”

The HotSW bid asks for a range of powers, including greater control over road and rail investment, more influence over house building and land use, and better integration of health and social care. Similar responsibilities have been devolved to other areas, including Cornwall, but only authorities with mayors have gained significant control over health budgets and business rates. The additional funding allocated to fund devolution also varies from deal to deal, starting from £15 million a year in Lincolnshire, to £36 million in the West Midlands.

At a Plymouth City Council meeting earlier this month, Labour councillor Tudor Evans called for a “serious conversation” about money. He argued the South West deal must not “set up the combined authority… for a fall”. He told the council chamber: “We’ve known for along time things like adult social care… health services… public health [are] inadequately funded. “We must use this… to unlock the bad funding formulae that have consigned us to not doing the best we can for too many years.”

Coun. Osman states that “the devil is in the detail” when it comes to finances. But he is confident that as councils take on new responsibilities from Government “funding will hopefully follow”. “If not, there is an inkling that we will be able to get some other sources of funding well,” he said. “Not council tax rises or anything like that, but money from central government or business rate rises.”

An area of underlying tension throughout the development of the bid has been geography, with Government keen for bids to focus on LEP boundaries. However, there are those who argue an authority which straddles multiple cities and counties will lack the sense of unity and identity enjoyed by somewhere like Cornwall. Other large multi-authority bids have come close to unravelling, with the East Anglia deal eventually being split into two after Cambridgeshire County Council rejected plans.

Gary Streeter points out that while the tendency in Somerset is “to look Eastwards toward Bristol and London”, in Devon the natural instinct is to look West toward Cornwall. “Most of us feel that… the region should be Devon and Cornwall, but we seem to have gone past that point,” he said. “Some people feel more strongly about it than others, particularly I think the Somerset MPs…. but is not necessarily a deal breaker. “There seems to be broad support for establishing Devon and Somerset. And there is support for a combined authority, provided we know how its going to work and its not simply adding another tier of government.”

Coun. Osman believes a break-up of the Devon and Somerset alliance is “unlikely”, adding that ministers are “pleased” that the 23 authorities have remained united. He said council leaders and staff will work hard over coming months to make the most of an opportunity to “shape the agenda for the South West”.

Mr Streeter is more reserved, suggesting that the new secretary of state may want to take a fresh look at the devolution agenda. He states that a November timetable “is a possibility” but “a lot of water has got to flow under that bridge yet”, and MPs will get a vote on the final deal. “Over the next two or three months… the detail [of the deal] is likely to change and emerge, so I think people shouldn’t get too hung up on the detail,” he added. “My own feeling is that with the new secretary of state coming in… some of the slight vagueness of the current proposal will be addressed.”

At a glance: What is a combined authority?

The 17 Devon and Somerset councils making a joint bid for devolution have been asked to support a new combined authority in order to progress to a deal.

Councillors stress this is not an attempt to merge authorities, or to take powers from lower tier councils– but there is potential for this to change.

Ministers first legislated for the creation of combined authorities in 2009, to allow councils to pool resources for the delivery of local services.

Their powers were enhanced by the passage of the recent Cities and Local Government Devolution Act, and the model has subsequently been taken up in a number of areas bidding for devolution.

In areas like Great Manchester and the Liverpool City Region, they have opted to establish CAs under the control of an elected mayor. However, the Heart of the South West (HotSW) region could be one of the first areas to secure a devolution package with a non-mayoral CA.

As proposals currently stand, the Devon and Somerset CA would be made up of one member from each council, national park, Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and the Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) involved with the bid. Council leaders claim it will not be a physical entity or a “new bureaucracy,” but will simply be a way to coordinate the distribution of new funds and powers throughout the region.

The aim is to improve oversight without resorting to a directly elected mayor system, which many see as unsuitable for a region as large and diverse as Devon and Somerset. However, reports state that it is possible to change to a mayoral CA at a later date, and for powers to be transferred from lower tier councils “subject to agreement”.

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/devon-and-somerset-on-cusp-of-devolution-deal-but-mps-want-more-clarity/story-29549453-detail/story.html

Government must re-assess all high cost projects says National Audit Office

“There needs to be a “step change” in the way the civil service does business in the wake of Brexit and other challenges, the comptroller and auditor general has said.

In a speech to the Institute for Government last week, Amyas Morse said the civil service was “over-committed” and should abandon projects that are not “mission critical”.

“We need to ask ourselves, can the public sector deliver Hinckley Point C, a third runway, HS2, a northern powerhouse, nuclear decommissioning, Trident renewal and restoration and renewal of the Palace of Westminster all at the same time?” he asked.

“All these projects are drawing on the same pool of skills and many of these contain optimism bias that they will be able to meet their skills needs at an appropriate cost.”

He suggested that, if the civil service was over-committed, it should stop doing things, either by not commissioning new projects or by cancelling existing ones.

“Prioritising is about making these choices intelligently,” Morse said. “So we need to know how much scarce resource would be released by a particular decision and what consequence that decision would have elsewhere.”

Brexit, he said, was an “abnormal challenge” and brought with it “a completely new layer of unknowns and requirements”.

Existing Whitehall activities were being denuded of capability as civil servants were pulled away to work on aspects of Brexit.

Should Scotland leave the UK – something Morse dubbed “Scoxit” – the civil service would become even more stretched and could grind to a halt under its own weight.

“We will have set civil servants a Herculean task and set them up to fail. And none of us can afford that. I am calling for a step change in the way we manage the activities of government.”

In particular, every Whitehall department will need to carry out a stock take of its interactions with the European Union and new systems and operations put in place to fill the gap left by Brussels.

Brexit would have to be a priority across government and not just in the new Brexit department, he stressed.

“Let’s use this historic juncture to change the way we manage government and plan on a holistic basis so that ministers and civil servants can look across the whole of government activities and decide what is essential and what is not,” he concluded. “This is crucial for achieving value for money.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/07/whitehall-must-review-all-projects-free-capacity-eu-exit-says-morse

Taxpayers Alliance wants most planning rules to be abolished

“The government should scrap stamp duty and ease planning restrictions to address the worsening housing crisis, the TaxPayers’ Alliance has said today.

In a new report, the group called for “real reform” to tackle the housing shortage accusing successive governments of merely tinkering around the edges instead of dealing with underlying issues facing the sector. …

… the fundamental problem with housing markets in Britain is overly tight planning restrictions, the group suggests. The alliance urges the government to declassify swathes of green-belt land to tackle the chronic lack of new house building. For example, it estimates that allowing just 5% of the greenbelt around London to be built on will enable the city to grow by one sixth.

Taller, denser housing construction should be also encouraged, as well as more infilling, despite the likely increased pressure on traffic systems and public services.

The alliance cites the work of groups such as the Campaign to Protect Rural England, the Victorian Society, and the “thousands” of local groups who successfully protect the character of communities.

However, protecting land from development restricts the supply of new properties and inevitably raises the cost of housing, the alliance argues. It says: “The political fact is that housing cannot become more affordable unless it becomes cheaper and easier to build more of it in the places where … groups object.”

Jonathan Isaby, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “For decades politicians have failed to tackle the root causes of the housing crisis: a chronic lack of supply. What’s more, stamp duty is still punitively high and gimmicky tweaks to the tax system will ultimately end up penalising tenants and increasing rents.”

Isaby is urging new chancellor Phillip Hammond to seize the opportunity “to drastically simplify and reduce property taxes, while removing planning restrictions which prevent huge swathes of land from being built on for no good reason at all”.

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/07/abolish-stamp-duty-and-ease-planning-restrictions-urges-taxpayers-alliance

“Planning applications for new shops fell 9% in past year”

“There were 6,700 applications for new retail developments in 2015, down from 7,360, according to commercial law firm EMW. They are down by nearly a half from the pre-recession peak of 11,900 in 2008.

The fall shows the continuing pressures on shopkeepers as consumers desert the high street in favour of online shopping with e-commerce companies. EMW said that despite traditional retailers increasingly focusing on and expanding their online services, many are often failing to compete effectively with online-only retailers, such as Asos and Boohoo.

It said the recent failures of traditional retailers BHS, Austin Reed, and convenience store chain My Local were partly caused by the continued success of online-only brands.”

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jul/25/planning-applications-new-shops-fell-nine-per-cent-past-year?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

“Post-truth’ politics are a debasement of standards in public life”

“Verbal dexterity, inconsistency and ‘spin’ are part and parcel of normal politics but the exaggerations and distortions of the EU referendum campaign has led to concerns about ‘post-truth’ politics.

Nicholas Allen and Sarah Birch write there is a need for someone to provide a moral lead, and argue the Committee for Standards in Public Life could play a valuable role by establishing some relevant basic markers. …

… current trends, first identified in the context of US politics and more recently in the context of British politics, risk stretching beyond breaking-point a basic commitment to truth and honesty that is essential for liberal democracy. Without it, citizens cannot hope to achieve ‘enlightened understanding’ and learn about what best serve their interests, one of five criteria identified by Robert Dahl that define modern democratic government. Someone in government, or at least in officialdom, needs to take note. Someone needs to provide a moral lead. …

… Morality in politics needs to come from somewhere. The CSPL [Committee for Standards in Public Life] is charged with overseeing standards in public life. The new prime minister should give it the resources and remit to do just this.

‘Post-truth’ politics are a debasement of standards in public life

School academies: what they REALLY cost US, the taxpayer

“The leaders of academy schools are spending taxpayers’ money on luxury hotels, top-end restaurants, first-class travel, private health care and executive cars, a joint investigation by Channel 4’s Dispatches and the Observer can reveal.

Expense claims released under the Freedom of Information Act lay bare for the first time what critics claim is an extraordinary extravagance by some academy chain chief executives and principals, at a time when schools are struggling financially.

The taxpayer is paying Ian Cleland, the £180,000-a-year chief executive at Academy Transformation Trust, to lease and have joint insurance with his wife on an XJ Premium Luxury V6 Jaguar car, it can be disclosed. Included in nearly £3,000 worth of receipts is payment for servicing the car and the purchase of new tyres.

Cleland has also spent £3,000 of taxpayers’ money on first-class rail travel, while dining expenses racked up on his taxpayer-funded credit card include a meal with other staff at Marco Pierre White totalling £471, and the Bank restaurant in Birmingham, at a cost £703.45. …

… The Paradigm Trust pays for its CEO, Amanda Phillips, to have broadband at her holiday home in France, even though she earns £195,354 a year.

Meanwhile, as former education secretary Michael Gove’s vision of a more market-led school system has materialised, in which multi-academy trusts have taken the place of local authorities, salary levels have soared within the management tier, it can be revealed. More than half of the largest 50 chains pay their chief executives more than the prime minister (£143,000). Sir Daniel Moynihan, the chief executive of the high-performing Harris Federation, earns £395,000 a year.

The chief executive of the Aspirations Academies Trust, which runs 12 schools, pays its chief executive and founder, Stewart Kenning, a total package of £225,000, while his wife, Paula Kenning, receives £175,000 as executive principal and founder. And as the salaries have shot up, the so-called related party transactions – where companies with close links to directors of academy trusts are paid for services to those trusts – have also multiplied.

Take, for example, the US organisation founded by Dr Russell Quaglia, the American-based co-founder of the Aspirations Academy Trust (AAT). In a document uncovered through a freedom of information request, the trust claims to the regulator that it is abiding by the no-profit rule governing such transactions, and it is suggested that the American is working at a discount.

It actually costs Quaglia $8,300 (£6,330) a time to come to Britain, AAT claims. “This is based on transportation costs to and from the US, including parking and travel to and from airports in the US – $5,000,” the document says, adding of further costs: “Hotels and meals: $3,000; internal travel (trains/cabs/tubes): $300. For six visits a year, the [annual] average cost would therefore be $49,800.”

The trust adds that the provision of Quaglia’s top-of-the-range staff and student surveys to the schools costs an additional $20,000 a year. And his normal consultancy rates range from $9,600 a day to $18,000 a day, plus travel costs, it is said. “The amounts paid directly to Dr Quaglia, in lieu of basic salary, range from $8,000 to $15,000.

“Based on 15 days’ consultancy for the AAT, the total day rate cost would be a minimum of $120,000. We can confirm that Dr Quaglia is in high demand and turns down 75% of approaches, so any time not devoted to ATT would be easily filled by other paying engagements. In conclusion, the cost … equates to £114,337, which is significantly above the charged amount of £89,724.” …

http://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/jul/23/education-academies-funding-expenses

” The inanities of the National Planning Policy Framework “

Letters page Daily Telegraph 23 July 2016:

SIR –

It is the kind of self-interested view of the planning system given by Professor Adam that got us into this mess in the first place. Developers play the system to obtain permissions that they land-bank rather than build-out.

The inanities of the National Planning Policy Framework then allow them to use the lack of five-year housing supply to demand even more permissions, often in places that command higher prices than those that communities have identified for development.

Developers are businesses and they are interested in profit. It is time for a rather obtuse government to understand that this doesn’t deliver either mass housing or specific housing such as bungalows.

There is selective deafness on the part of the Government in respect of the failure of the National Planning Policy Framework. Maybe this is yet another example of why there was selective deafness on the part of the electorate to the wishes of the Government in relation to the referendum.

Jenny Unsworth
Congleton, Cheshire

You want an NHS dentist in East Devon? Tough, join the other 560 people on the waiting list

The number of patients who were unallocated and on the waiting list for a NHS dentists:

Exeter as of July 1, 2016, was 3,900, previously 846 as of July 1, 2015

East Devon as of July 1, 2016, was 560, previously 120 as of July 1, 2015

Mid Devon as of July 1, 2016 was 370, previously 113 as of July 1, 2015

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/huge-rise-in-waiting-list-to-see-an-nhs-dentist-in-exeter/story-29543976-detail/story.html

Local NHS: cut, burn, slash, destroy

“Out of hours doctors care is to undergo some radical changes in Devon with the number of treatment centres being reduced and others having no overnight service.

Exmouth will entirely lose its treatment centre at Exmouth Hospital, as will Teignmouth, while other areas such Tiverton will see its hours significantly reduced.

As of October 3, they will reduce to nine, and some centres will no longer have out of hours services between 12am and 8am, such as Tiverton and Honiton.

It is also believed the amount of Devon Doctor cars to cover the region from 12am to 8am will be reduced by two. This will leave four cars to undertake home visits and return the their bases to see previous arranged treatment patients.

And a spokesperson said :- In Exmouth, there is NHS services available. The hospital is there and the minor injuries unit, and patients will be offered to attend Exeter treatment centre.

“There will still be overnight urgent care. Patients with a clinical need who are not able to get to a treatment centre will still receive a home visit as they do now.”

Source: Bay FM, Facebook

EDDC “Communications”: pigs, flying, sky …. and ” avoiding the barking mad”!

Here is the introduction to EDDC’s new communications policy:

Communications Plan 2016-2020

… Purpose and scope of the communications plan

This plan aims to ensure we have good communications which improve residents’ lives, keep them informed and help them access services more easily.

This plan will help develop EDDC’s brand so that it becomes instantly recognisable and synonymous with our council plan priorities, values and key drivers of great customer service and value for money services in an outstanding place.

The more we involve and tell people about what we are doing and why, the better more informed they will feel. We have a great story to tell and we need to tell it well – this means effectively and consistently. …

Addressing local priorities

This plan aims to deliver effective communications to our customers. We strongly believe that customers who are informed about our services and benefits are more positive in their view of the Council than those who are not so informed.

Our Council Plan outlines that we will ‘continuously improve to be an outstanding council’ and that we will ‘prioritise keeping our residents informed’.

This communication plan will support the communication of the priorities and outcomes in the Council Plan:

 Encouraging communities to be outstanding
 Developing an outstanding local economy
 Delivering and promoting our outstanding environment
 Continuously improving to be an outstanding council

Principles underpinning this action plan:
 Communication and reputation management is a top-table issue

It’s about avoiding the ‘barking mad’ by thinking about everything we do and everything we say/don’t say from a reputation management perspective

 Stop talking about ‘they’ and start talking about ‘we’!

 We are all responsible for reputation management and communications.

 We think about different audiences: residents, members, officers, towns and
parishes, partners, business groups. …”

Click to access 280616-overview-agenda-combined.pdf

Whoops, big omission: they missed out developers from the last sentence!

Devolution: Horses, carts, stable doors …

EDDC issues a press release on 21 July 2016 saying that on 13 July 2016 its Cabinet decided to press ahead with devolution plans:

http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/cabinet_agrees_to_continue_east_devon_devolution_talks_in_principle_1_4625365

THEN

the Overview Committee discusses it on 28 July:

Click to access 280616-overview-agenda-combined.pdf

And STILL we are not allowed our say!

Priceless.

Please don’t let this give our Police and Crime Commissioner ideas!

Funds are so tightly squeezed in Police Scotland that officers have been sent to trawl charity shops for equipment, according to the leader of the Scottish Police Federation.

In an abrasively-worded article on the SPF website, general secretary Calum Steele also claims that police dog-handlers had been called off from following trails for fear of running into overtime. He says that service quality has become a postcode lottery where “cash is king” in determining operational priorities.

On one occasion, Steele says, officers were told to “scour charity shops” to buy car sun blinds in order to keep out of view a child that was being driven in a police car.

“At a time when so much emphasis is being placed on the cost of policing, it’s long overdue that we had a real conversation about its value,” Steele writes.

“Cash is king and woe betide anyone who isn’t playing their part in making cuts. Theorising on paper that the service will be improved by cutting is a fool’s errand and the public is being misled over the policing realities of today.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/07/cuts-prompt-police-scotland-source-equipment-charity-shops

EDF raided by French authorities

EDF raided by French authorities ahead of Hinkley greenlight

French finance authorities have raided the offices of EDF just days before the state-backed energy giant is expected to give the go-ahead to its controversial Hinkley Point new nuclear project.

The long-awaited final decision on the Hinkley project is scheduled to take place at a board meeting next Thursday, even as authorities in both the UK and France escalate concerns over the costs of the £18bn project.

French investigators from the Financial Markets Authority (AMF) swooped on EDF’s Paris headquarters on Thursday morning as part of a probe into EDF’s disclosure of information to the market. Investigators are said to be concerned about the reporting of its domestic nuclear maintenance costs as well as the plans to develop new nuclear reactors in Somerset.

Local media reports say the AMF recovered a series of documents from the EDF offices and requested a meeting with EDF general secretary Pierre Todorov.

Just hours after the raid the company said it would hold a board meeting on Thursday 28 July to agree a final decision on the project, feeding speculation that the company is preparing to push ahead with the 3.2GW project.

The company also has a scheduled extraordinary general meeting on Tuesday next week, seeking approval from shareholders for its proposed £3bn recapitalistion.

Meanwhile, the head of the UK’s National Audit Office has raised further concerns over the UK’s plans to subside EDF’s plans in the face of a “tidal wave” of pressures from an impending Brexit and a pipeline of existing infrastructure projects requiring a total of £405bn.

Sir Amyas Morse, comptroller and auditor general at the NAO, told the Guardian in an interview that projects such as the Hinkley Point C nuclear plant, a third runway at Heathrow and the ambitious HS2 rail project would have to be reassessed as the government decides which can be done without, according to a report in the Guardian.

“We need to ask ourselves, can the public sector deliver Hinkley Point C, a third runway, HS2, a Northern Powerhouse, nuclear decommissioning, Trident renewal and restoration and renewal of the Palace of Westminster all at the same time?” asked Sir Amyas.

“There is a policy at the moment to have lots of infrastructure projects. I say fine, but some of them will have very big consequences in terms of your ability to deliver your other goals,” he said.

In a recent report, the NAO heaped criticism on the Hinkley Point plans saying the spiralling costs will hit consumers in the pocket, even as other low carbon energy options offer an increasingly better deal.

The subsidy bill to be paid by households and businesses for Hinkley Point has more than quadrupled since the agreement for the new nuclear plant was signed in 2013.

At the time the deal was signed, power price projections had implied a lifetime cost to consumers of £6.1bn for the subsidies. But as of March this year, that had more than quadrupled to £29.7bn due to significant cuts to official power price forecasts.

EDF declined to comment on the raid, and the AMF was unavailable.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/07/22/edf-raided-by-french-authorities-ahead-of-hinkley-greenlight/

A conundrum – EDDC: less money, less services, more (expensive) staff

Is there any reason why the publishing of EDDC’s employee statistics is two months late?

The last year has seen a substantial rise in employee numbers, particularly senior officers, with growth of between twenty and thirty new staff, depending upon which measure you prefer.

With average wages for senior staff at EDDC at £30,000+, plus all additional costs such as pensions, expenses, etc., this brings the cost per employee to around £50,000 per annum, this mean that the wage bill may have climbed by between £1 and £1.5 million. This was presumably not budgeted for, so where is the money coming from? More debt, perhaps?

And, of course, the extra staff will have to be housed in the new HQ … so maybe that will have to expand, too.