“Flatpack Democracy” talk in Exeter

“Many politicians are making decisions to meet their own needs or those of their Party, not the needs of the people they serve”.

Tuesday 25th October 2016, 7.30pm | Exeter, Exeter Castle

This is the opinion of the author of Flatpack Democracy and founder of Independents for Frome, Peter Macfadyen. And he’ll be sharing his vision at the first ever 38 Degrees Live event.

The evening at Exeter Castle will be hosted by award-winning presenter and comedian, Charlie Partridge. It’s free to attend and there’s a cash bar available.

Tickets via Eventbrite

Devon and Somerset devolution on governments “back burner”

Owl has two questions:

if it IS on the back burner, should we be hanging on Somerset’s coat tails, hoping for Hinkley C breadcrumbs and an elected Mayor who will be Hinkley-centric?

and

should we be employing LEP staff and shovelling out expenses to our LEP while things are re-evaluated – or should we cut our losses, scrap it and look to sustaining our own Devon economy in what will possibly be rocky post- Brexit times?

The region’s devolution bid appears to have been shoved onto the back burner this week, following a Government U-turn on the need for elected mayors.

Earlier this year council leaders were optimistic of securing a deal by the autumn, after agreeing on proposals to establish a combined-authority.

But the Treasury now looks to have ruled this possibility out, after revealing its “priority” will be areas with directly elected mayors.

Speaking to the Herald, Treasury minister David Gauke claimed this model provides local authorities with “maximal” opportunities for devolved powers.

“To get the most powers you need the best accountability and that’s delivered by directly-elected mayors,” he said.

“We think [it’s] the best model… so we continue to encourage local authorities to go down that route.

“Those areas that don’t want to go down that route, we will of course still look at the devolution options there.

“I think the priority is delivering the directly elected mayor model.”

This renewed focus on mayors appears to contradict messages from the Department for Communities and Local Government, which has previously indicated support for a combined authority model.

Earlier this year, councils in Devon and Somerset voted in favour of creating a combined authority for the region, on the understanding this would improve the area’s chances of a devolution deal.

Critics of the mayoral model express concern about the ability of a single leader to effectively represent areas as economically and geographically diverse as Plymouth and the Mendips.

Responding to Mr Gauke’s comments, leader of Somerset County Council, John Osman, said his understanding “is that the Prime Minister does not think a mayor is essential for devolution”.

“Some initial public engagement this summer suggests that is a view shared by Somerset residents,” he added.

“We have a compelling case for devolved powers and budgets which has the potential to drive productivity, address challenges and capitalise on our many opportunities.

“We aim to continue these with the new relevant minister, Sajid Javid, in the near future to maintain the momentum and take our plans forward.”

Conservative MP for Wells, James Heappey, acknowledged that the recent change in Government leadership has resulted in changes to devolution policy.

He suggested this could provide the region with an opportunity to “take [its] foot off the accelerator” and review its proposals.

“If there is value in doing it, if it’s going to allow public services to be more efficient…. Then clearly we should go ahead [with a combined authority bid],” he said.

“[But] it makes no sense to change things just for the sake of changing things.”

Kevin Foster, the MP for Torbay – which recently voted to scrap its mayoral system – said many residents “won’t be itching” to have another elected mayor.

But he suggested the option is worth considering if it means “getting transport powers and an ability to deliver for local people”.

Mr Gauke did stress that the Government is still keen to extend devolution beyond the high profile city regions.

He said “a lot of focus has been on cities” but it would be good to “show how devolution can work in all parts of the country”.

Read more at http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/ministers-send-devon-devolution-deal-to-the-back-of-the-queue/story-29780812-detail/story.html

Seaton/Colyford green wedge under attack from developers for the fourth time

Amended Planning Application 15/2188/MOUT

hosted by
Seaton & Colyford Green Wedge Community Action Group

Wednesday 12th October 7.00pm
Seaton Town Council Office Meeting Room
Marshlands Centre, Harbour Road, Seaton EX12 2LT

The above Meeting will be Chaired by Howard West, Leader of the Group, and Martin Shaw, a Seaton Town Councillor and Chair of their Planning Committee will also speak and explain the details of the Application. They will both be taking questions.

If you have looked at the paperwork in more detail, you will notice there is only one football pitch, with a Training & Recreation Area, plus parking and a Club House. Seaton FC were asking for two pitches. The Application mentions that there will be no floodlighting to the Recreation Area and Training Ground, but does not mention about the football pitch! Therefore we must assume that there will be floodlighting, as there is on the existing football pitch in Seaton.

This is a Public Meeting and you are all invited to come along and participate in the discussion. The Marshlands Centre is situated at the Harbour Road roundabout and there is limited parking on site. There is plenty of parking in the vicinity including Tescos (max 2 hours)”

LEP creates its own “Business Forum” – but it’s independent, honest guv!

Owl’s view: Unfortunately, it still walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and is still one hundred percent an LEP duck! Oh, and who is on it’s board – LEP Board member Tim Jones – quack, quack!

“A new business group has been formed to advise Government decision makers – but stressed it is not in competition with other South West business organisations.

B4SW will provide information and reports to the South West Local Enterprise Partnership (HotSW LEP) and ensure businesses across the region have a strong voice in discussions over Government investment.

“We have no intention of competing with other business groups,” Mr Marrow said. “They are doing good stuff.”

He explained that B4SW may be new, but is actually a “restructuring” of the Heart of the South West Local Enterprise Partnership’s (HotSW LEP) business forum.

That body was set up by the LEP, but was nevertheless independent of it, in order to provide business engagement.

But the forum was often mistaken as being part of the LEP, Chris Marrow, B4SW chairman, explained.

So, he said, B4SW has been formed as a community interest company (CIC), a type of social enterprise, to provide “a better structure to that of the forum, which had been “an informal group”.

Mr Marrow said the new organisation would report to the LEP, the organisation created by the coalition Government in 2011 to determine investment priorities, but is not constrained by the HotSW area of Devon and parts of Somerset.

“We meet around the region and will cover Cornwall,” Mr Marrow said, at an early meeting held in Plymouth.

“It’s a forum in which business people can come together and explore ideas and put their expertise back into the community for the advantage of the region.”

Mr Marrow said B4SW is composed of business people with vast experience in sectors such as maritime, supply chain, education, rural development and overseas trade.

“We have business people with particular expertise, a lot of experience in international affairs, with overseas contacts, and work with people in Africa and China,” he said.

He said the executive board has links to various other organisations such as universities and colleges, Chambers of Commerce, and the Federation of Small Businesses.

“The objective is to help businesses develop in the South West,” he said. “That includes improving exports, productivity, and job creation.”

He said B4SW would provide “blue sky thinking” and supply reports to the LEP.

He gave examples of studies into biofuels, ballast water management and kelp (seaweed) farming.

B4SW has also arranged a visit from transport training experts in South Africa and had discussions with Plymouth University and Flybe about maritime and aviation training.

Tim Jones, a B4SW board member, said the aim is also to bring together all business organisations across the HotSW and Cornwall and Isles of Scilly LEPs.

He said it was vital businesses shared a unified voice in order to push for Government investment, especially as political devolution is on the agenda.

“A combined business voice is essential, and becoming more so as we move down the devolution agenda and anther round of Government austerity,” he said. “So the cooperation of the business community is crucial.

“With devolution, although there is talk about business engagement, there’s a fear the voice of business will diminish.

“Combine that with the problems Whitehall has about infrastructure investment in the South West, it’s vital we have a single voice coming from the business community.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/new-business-group-set-up-to-push-for-government-investment-in-south-west/story-29775868-detail/story.html

Information Commissioner says Council business plans cannot be secret

Repercussions for EDDC? You can bet Exeter City Council will appeal!

“Exeter Green Party has clashed with Exeter City Council over secret information about the financial viability of St Sidwell’s Point.

The Greens made a request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOI) to access parts of the business case for the planned council owned leisure complex.

They say the council has “persistently refused” to give them the information.

Green Party member Peter Cleasby complained to the Information Commissioner, the independent authority set up by Parliament to uphold public access to documents.

Mr Cleasby said the public had a legitimate right to see information shared privately to councillors about the financial viability of the leisure complex project.

The commissioner agreed, and has ordered the council to publish its estimates of income from the leisure centre.

The council are seeking advice regarding an appeal against this decision.

Mr Cleasby said: “The public were not consulted about whether we wanted the leisure centre or not. We were simply told that £26 million of the Council’s money would be spent on building it.

“We were not offered the chance to suggest other uses for £26 million, and we were not allowed to see the assumptions made by the Council about whether the leisure centre could be run without being a drain on public finances.

“So as an individual I asked for this information to be made available for scrutiny by others who could form an independent view on whether the numbers added up. The Council refused, three times changing their reasons for not releasing it.”

A council spokesperson hit back, saying: “The public were consulted multiple times in accordance with the open and transparent planning process for what will be one of the greenest schemes of its kind anywhere in the country.

“As Mr Cleasby has pointed out, we are entitled to appeal the Information Commissioner’s decision and we are taking appropriate advice.”

Diana Moore, former parliamentary candidate for the Green Party in Exeter, said: “Exeter Green Party are not opposed to a new leisure complex in principle, but openness and real public engagement are essential in major projects of this sort.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/exeter-council-clash-with-greens-ahead-of-st-sidwell-s-point-planning-decision/story-29781273-detail/story.html

Talk at Exeter Uni by Chief Executive of NHS on 21st Century NHS

Simon Stevens:

Creating a 21st Century NHS

Part of the Exeter Lecture Series

Wednesday 2 November 2016, 19.00 – 20.00

Alumni Auditorium, The Forum (Streatham Campus)
Video linked to G10 Lecture Theatre, Truro (Knowledge Spa)
Tea and coffee available on Streatham Campus from 18.30

Register now at Eventbrite (free)

In this talk Simon Stevens, Chief Executive of NHS England, will talk about creating a 21st Century NHS.

Simon is the Chief Executive of NHS England, which leads the NHS’s work nationally to improve health and ensure high quality care for all. He is accountable to Parliament for over £100 billion of annual Health Service funding.

During this lecture you will be able to hear about plans for the NHS and have the opportunity to participate in a short question and answer session with Simon.

The lecture will be hosted by the Provost, Professor Janice Kay, and is open to staff, students and the general public. To register for this event and to read more about Simon please visit the event web page.

Please note: this event will not be recorded, therefore booking is essential if you would like to attend.
Launched in our Diamond Jubilee year, the ‘Exeter Lectures’ will bring high profile speakers from the worlds of academia, business, the arts and civil society to the University to share their thoughts and ideas, provoke discussion, and challenge us to rethink how we understand society.

Contact us: diamondjubilee@exeter.ac.uk

Housing Minister wants more tiny “pocket apartments”

Or, “Honey I shrunk the flat – and how! And you can bet they won’t be any cheaper than current apartments – just slightly more of them.

“Britain already builds the smallest homes in Europe. A one-bedroom flat averages at 500sq ft – about the size of a tube carriage – while Barwell’s favoured developer, Pocket Living, sells 400sq ft flats for a quarter of a million pounds apiece.

The Royal Institute of British Architects says that more than half of new houses built are too small for families to live in (it’s a bit of a mystery where all these “home-grown” workers our Brexit-mad government keeps going on about are actually going to, well, grow up).

The average home in Denmark is twice as big as one of ours already. It’s a shameful state of affairs unlikely to be remedied by one of the stupidest policy suggestions to come out of the housing crisis thus far”

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/05/housing-crisis-building-standards-size

Draft Exe Estuary Management Plan 2016-2021 – public consultation today

THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION IS TODAY FROM 1pm – 8pm AT COUNTY HALL

WRITTEN RESPONSES BY 30 OCTOBER

“Draft Exe Estuary Management Plan 2016-2021

The draft Management Plan covering 2016-2021 for the Exe Estuary is now available through the link above for public consultation, for a six week period from 19th September to 30th October 2016. The plan has been reviewed since the Interim Management Plan 2012-2015, to take into consideration issues and changes that are highlighted in the updated State of the Exe Estuary 2014 report, and outlines policies, and five year objectives to ensure sustainable use of the Exe Estuary for the future.

A public consultation event will be held on Wenesday 5th October from 1pm to 8pm at County Hall, for those that would like to find out more about the Management Plan and offer their feedback. We will be able to offer guidance at the event on how you can best provide feedback during the consultation. In preparation, you may wish to consider these Guidance Questions.

The event will take place at the Council Chamber and Ante Chamber at County Hall, Topsham Road, Exeter, EX2 4QD. Travel information to the venue can be found here. I will be at the Council Chamber to enable access on the day.

If you are unable to make the workshop, please send your comments and observations via email to exeestua@devon.gov.uk. Please use the above Guidance Questions to help with your response, but we welcome comments on any aspects of the Management Plan. We strongly advise you to respond using ‘Track Changes’ within the document and state whether you are responding as an individual or on behalf of a group or organisation.

Your views are valuable to us and we appreciate your taking the time to read the document and make comments. We will endeavour to reply to everyone who takes part in the consultation (if we have contact details) and will consider all comments that are offered.”

https://www.exe-estuary.org/partnership-documents5

“Lazy civil servants” upset ?UKIP ?Leader Nigel Farage

“Nigel Farage today revealed he is “probably” still the leader of Ukip following Diane James’s resignation after just 18 days.

The Ukip MEP told HuffPost UK he was looking for confirmation from the Electoral Commission as to whether he was legally still in charge of his party.

The admission came after it was revealed by party sources that James did not submit the relevant forms to the Commission to officially become party leader.

It is believed she wrote the words “under duress” in Latin underneath her signature, rendering the forms void.

Speaking to the HuffPost UK this morning, Farage said: “I don’t want to be leader, but I think legally I probably still am.

“We’re just waiting to speak to the Electoral Commission, but they’re not open yet as they’re lazy civil servants.”

https://t.co/6DcP4zbv4N

Nigel Farage … called in to advise Donald Trump on how to run an election campaign … Owl can see why.

Thank goodness we have an Electoral Commission!

“Speaking to Radio 4’s Today programme, UKIP chairman Paul Oakden said he would check with the Electoral Commission to see who the party leader was and admitted it could technically be Mr Farage.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37558485

Where is the “centre ground”?

With the centre of the Tories now being much more to the right and the centre of Labour being much more to the left, Lib Dems not sure where they are except on Europe, UKIP – well, they can’t even get a new leader who can stick the job, and Greens tending towards Labour and with the major parties outdoing each other with spin, back stabbing and infighting – who do you vote for if you are a centre-left Tory or a centre-right Labour voter or Lib Dem Brexiteer or a disaffected Kipper or a non-left leaning Green or anyone else who doesn’t want to be button- holed?

Why, an independents, of course – who occupy the real centre ground by just doing what they believe is right by the communities they serve without allegiance to any of the parties and with no party whip!

Or, as Claire Wright would say: Free to speak, free to act.

Be careful what you sign (independent) councillors

“A Bath councillor was asked to step out of discussions about a multimillion care contract after the council found out she had signed a petition opposing Virgin Care’s bid to win it.

Lin Patterson, who has called the incident “spooky” and “heavy handed”, said she was asked by a council officer to remove herself from relevant committee discussions over fears Virgin Care would sue.

The Lambridge councillor said she was told that she had a “conflict of interest” because she had signed a private petition opposing Virgin Care’s bid to win the £700m community care contract.

But at the time she was asked to step outside when the “Your Care, Your Way” contract was being discussed by the Health and Wellbeing Select Committee the names of the signatories were private.

The petition, hosted by 38Degrees, was not handed to Bath and North East Somerset Council until July 21. But Ms Patterson said she was “pulled aside” a whole month beforehand on June 20.

She said she was denied an explanation about how the council had found out she had signed the petition, and the council has since refused to answer the Bath Chronicle’s questions about the matter.

Ms Patterson, who represents the Green Party, added that the request for her to leave the room was “a bit of a departure”.

Conservative councillor Paul May said he had voluntarily excused himself from any committee or council discussions about the contract ever since becoming a non-executive director of the board of Sirona care and health, the other major bidder. When asked whether he thought Ms Patterson should have done the same, he said: “I don’t think I’m really qualified to say. My situation is very clear; hers I don’t think was quite so clear.”

Ms Patterson said: “The fact that the petition had not been submitted is actually very spooky and the fact that I was asked to leave the room I think was heavy handed.”

http://m.bathchronicle.co.uk/bath-councillor-removed-from-discussions-about-virgin-care-s-contract-bid-feels-she-was-spied-on/story-29774093-detail/story.html

One wonders how the matter would have been handled by her Party Whip had she been a majority party councillor …..

Sovereignty or dictatorship?

David Cameron did not discuss EU referendum with his Cabinet before he called it, claims Ken Clarke:

“David Cameron never discussed his decision to call a referendum on Britain’s membership in the European Union with his Cabinet, former Tory Cabinet minister Ken Clarke has claimed.

The 76-year-old Tory veteran criticised how Mr Cameron ran his Cabinet meetings, which he said met for 90 minutes one morning each week.

In his book, which is being serialised by The Sunday Times, Mr Clarke wrote: “This was an almost comically inadequate time within which to discuss any important subject.”

In particular, he said Mr Cameron failed to adequately discuss “his startling and catastrophic decision to call a referendum on Britain’s membership of the EU in cabinet”.

“… In my opinion, this is a disastrous way to run the government of a complex modern nation state,” he said. “It is a reaction to the hysterical constant 24/7 chatter that now dominates political debate.

“Media handling and public relations are now regarded as the key elements of governing, and a small army of advisers who are supposed to be PR experts but who are of frankly variable quality have far too big a role in policy-making.

“Next week’s headlines are given more priority than serious policy development and the long-term consequences for the nation.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/david-cameron-eu-referendum-brexit-ken-clarke-memoirs-pm-did-not-discuss-with-cabinet-a7342856.html

Yet another example of EDDC’s similarity to national government – secrecy and spin much more important than transparency and proper discussion.

Swire’s puzzling parliamentary questions on retrospective planning applications

Owl thinks the third question is most interesting – where he asks about fees paid by developers. Why “developers” rather than “people” or “applicants” or “homeowners”?

Just who is he representing? Local residents or developer pals?

1. To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what estimate his Department has made of the cost of retrospective planning applications to local councils in (a) Devon and (b) the UK in the last five years.

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2016-09-02.44219.h&s=speaker%3A11265#g44219.q0

2. To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what proportion of the cost of a retrospective planning application is covered by the (a) applicant and (b) local authority.

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2016-09-02.44220.h&s=speaker%3A11265#g44220.q0

3. To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, whether he plans to change the proportion of the cost of retrospective planning applications currently paid by developers.

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2016-09-02.44221.h&s=speaker%3A11265#g44221.q0

NB The answers from the Secretary of State are pretty useless!

Exmouth beach huts: to be or not to be? Depends whether you think the Development Management Committee makes decisions!

There is currently a planning application submitted – 16/2087/DEM to demolish the DJ’s Diner building on Exmouth Seafront.

At the DMC on 8th March Cllr Williamson (Littleham) proposed the condition (which was agreed) for the road move application that the cafe and the beach huts should not be demolished, nor any start to be made on the road, until there was a timescale, etc. for the water sports centre.

No timescale yet exists, yet the planning application seems to be completely ignoring this decision.

Unfortunately, the working that went in the final planning application is ( surprise, surprise) rather vague (approval document listed under application – 15/2487/MRES). However for those who were at the DMC, they are quite certain that the proposed condition was for no work – including demolition.

And of course there is also the issue of the town poll being ignored and EDDC ploughing ahead with leaving the area derelict regardless.

Boundaries, election boundaries, constituency statistics and more: interactive election and statistical website

Lots and lots of useful information including AONB boundaries, parliamentary constituencies, census statistics, etc.

http://www.boundaryassistant.org/PlanBuilder2018.html

More on that “extra” money for “housing” and its ?(un)intended consequences

“… The £3bn fund will be made up of £1bn in short-term loan funding. This will be used for small builders, custom builders, and innovators, delivering 25,500 homes this parliament. A further £2bn of funding for infrastructure will be used to unlock sites for up to 200,000 homes over the longer term. Of this, £1.15bn is new money.

The action will see the government use surplus public land to build more homes more quickly by encouraging new developers with different models to enter the market, and to support small and medium-sized firms and constructors. This will help to close the housing supply deficit, ministers stated.

In addition, local planning authorities will be able to grant permission in principle on sites suitable for housing-led development, as well as turning abandoned shopping centres into new communities and increasing housing density around transport hubs.

Javid said that the government had made progress in boosting construction, with over 700,000 net additional homes delivered between April 2010 and March 2015, but it was now time to go further.

“We want to ensure everyone has a safe and secure place to live and that means we’ve got to build more homes,” he added.

“It is only by building more houses that we will alleviate the financial burden on those who are struggling to manage.”

Hammond stated there had been a housing shortage in this country for decades, and that the government was determined to tackle it.”

“We’ll use all the tools at our disposal to accelerate housebuilding and ensure that over time, housing becomes more affordable, that is why we are committing £2bn of additional investment towards this.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/10/chancellor-pledges-ps3bn-build-25000-homes-2020

So, it’s short-term loans, selling off “public land” that the public will never get back or probably be able to replace, subsidising infrastructure that developers are supposed to pay for, decreasing the number of shopping centres and building little boxes near bus stations and railway stations.

And that’s a PLAN? The small builders will have to pay back the loans, public realm will be flogged off to developer friends at rock- bottom prices, WE pay for infrastructure instead of developers who still charge the same or more for the housing it leads to – AND we won’t be able to shop nearer home OR park our cars near bus stations and railways!

How many hospital beds make 5?

Disquieting information here:

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/the_case_for_cutting_hospital_beds_in_eastern_devon_gets_off_to_a_shaky_sta

from ever-campaigning Claire Wright. It raises some very serious questions about where the “Success Regime” gets its ” numbers” from.

Well done Councillor Wright for not letting this slip through the net.

A Freedom of Information request needed here, methinks.

Developer meeting … somewhere in deep, dark Devon

£3 billion or £5 billion to be made available to build 25,000 houses by 2020:

“OK Hammond is giving us £3 billion to build 25,000 homes by 2020 – that’s £120,000 per unit, right? So, you know that site we’ve had our eye on in the Home Counties, that we were going to put the £350,000 houses on – let’s just go right ahead and charge £475,000 and claim the subsidy. Right. That’s a £120,000 extra profit for each house. Phil – that looks like a nice little earner for us, can you get Damien to buy them all with those Panama shell companies he set up for us? Sweet!”

Hammond wants to “emphasise” brownfield sites:

“Phil I found a rotten brownfield site – it’s absolute rubbish – literally, built on an old landfill site the council is offering us for £1 – I know, I know – old Bill came up trumps, well worth that deal we did for his daughter. What do you think about slapping up a few ticky-tackies at about £50,000 a pop, claiming the brownfield subsidy of £120,000 each and flogging ’em off fast at a bargain price of, oh, let’s say £250,000? In, out, bosh, bosh, a donation to the party and bob’s my knighthood. Get on to it Phil – and keep a couple back, I hear Bill has a couple of other kids he needs to set up”.

Hammond has also suggested developing derelict shopping centres for housing:

“Now, about Middletown Shopping Centre. Yes, I KNOW it’s fully let, yes I KNOW it’s popular, yes, I KNOW there’s a waiting list for vacancies, yes, I KNOW it’s been a nice little earner for us over the years. But that new Hammond idea is the way to go. So, Damien – cut down the maintenance to bare bones, bung up the bogs and start telling the papers about the terrible drug problems there. Yes, I KNOW there isn’t a drug problem – it’s your job to make sure there is, Damien. … Now how many units can we cram in there with a £120,000 each subsidy. Yes, I KNOW they will have to go 5 miles to shop, but that isn’t my problem. (Starts to sing): “We’re in the money, we’re in the money…”

Housing: a sticking plaster on gangrene

“Key measures announced today include the launch of a new £3 billion Home Building Fund to help small and “custom” builders deliver 25,500 homes by 2020.

This will be used to unlock a pipe line of up to 200,000 homes over the longer term – with the emphasis on development on brownfield land.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/tories-promise-boost-for-housing-infrastructure-and-enterprise/story-29772997-detail/story.html

1. It will not stop land banking or developers dribbling out new houses to keep prices up.

2. Large builders will now create small offshoots to sponge up the money.

3. DEFINITELY no social or truly-affordable houses.

4. So far, no help for low and mid-income people to truly be able to afford deposits and mortgages without the bank of mum and dad.

5. Many of the new homes will probably be buy-to-let.

6. No INSISTENCE on brownfield sites, just am ” emphasis”.

Nice one. Just 25,000 more houses … a drop in the ocean …