“Persimmon facing revolt over executive pay and non-executive director”

“Persimmon facing revolt over executive pay and non-executive director
Investor bodies release share scheme warning amid concerns new board member Nigel Mills is not independent.

Persimmon, one of the UK’s biggest housebuilders, plans to appoint a new non-executive director to its board this week.

Housebuilder Persimmon could face protests over executive pay and the composition of its boardroom at this week’s annual general meeting.

Investor bodies have issued a warning over a share scheme set up in 2012 which could hand out an estimated £600m to 150 directors by 2022.

Some are also unhappy over the appointment of Nigel Mills as a non-executive director, questioning his independence because he is connected to the builders’ financial advisers, Citi.

Persimmon holds its AGM on Thursday, one of the first of the annual meeting season. It comes on the same day as those of miner Rio Tinto and oil company BP, which is also facing some opposition to its pay schemes.

While pay can often cause controversy at AGMs, this year companies may also face scrutiny about pledges made on climate change and any impact of the UK’s possible exit from the EU.

Advisory bodies have raised several areas of concern about Persimmon to shareholders. One, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), has advised voting against the election of Mills to the Persimmon board because of his connections to Citi.

This means he is not seen as independent by ISS, which also notes that Mills sits on the remuneration committee, which is meant to be entirely staffed by independent directors.

The Institutional Voting Information Service (Ivis) – which provides corporate governance research to investors – has also highlighted the relationship between Mills and Citi. Ivis does not give advice on how to vote but has issued an amber alert, its second highest level of warning, to raise corporate governance concerns.

Mills’s appointment to the board was announced in January alongside a series of other changes including the departures of non-executive directors Richard Pennycook, chief executive of the Co-operative Group, and Mark Preston, of Grosvenor estates.

Manifest, another advisory body, drew investors’ attention to the structure of the share bonus scheme. Another leading advisory service, Glass Lewis, also recommended voting against the remuneration report.

A Persimmon official said the long-term incentive plan had been approved in 2012. “This is a long-term plan that runs for almost a decade, which is designed to drive outperformance through the housing cycle and to incentivise the management to deliver the capital return, grow the business and increase the share price. Unlike many other schemes, it extends to around 150 executives.”

ISS does not recommend voting against the remuneration report, but Glass Lewis has advised a no vote because of the structure of the scheme, which is based on the premise that 620p per share – a total of £1.9bn – will be returned to shareholders by the end of 2021. The company has since increased its target to 900p per share but has not adjusted the basis upon which the scheme pays out to executives.

On the appointment of Mills to the board, Glass Lewis has been assured that the senior advisor at Citi has not worked on Persimmon business for three years so it would classify him as independent. However, it will monitor the situation.

ShareAction, a charity that promotes responsible investment, intends to use the AGM as an opportunity to encourage the company to consider living wage accreditation.

In February, when Persimmon announced the higher payout target of 900p a share, it had declared it had achieved an “outstanding performance” with a 34% rise in profits (before a goodwill impairment) to £638m. A shortage of new homes and schemes to encourage house buying have helped housebuilders such as Persimmon – although its shares, and those of its rivals, were among the biggest fallers in the FTSE 100 on Monday amid concerns of a slowdown in the economy.”

http://gu.com/p/4t8e5

Property deals: fewer and fewer places to hide

“Olympic bosses ordered to reveal West Ham stadium deal

Olympic Stadium bosses have been ordered to reveal details of their deal with West Ham United over the club’s use of the east London stadium.

The London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC) fought a London Assembly ruling that the contract should be made public. The appeal has been rejected by a separate tribunal.

West Ham are due to move to the Olympic Stadium at the end of the season.
The LLDC has the right to appeal against the latest decision.
It has not yet made a comment on the tribunal outcome.

West Ham’s vice-chairman Karren Brady has previously said she fought for the best deal, but has denied this was at the expense of taxpayers.
A fans’ group which called for the publication of the contract said it was “naturally delighted with the outcome”. …

… Football supporters first submitted a Freedom of Information request to obtain the tenancy agreement [West Ham and the Olympic stadium] amid claims the LLDC would subsidise the rent.

However, bosses appealed saying it would place them at a commercial disadvantage, undermine negotiations and reduce returns to the taxpayer.

In January, the London Assembly heard about £17,000 had been spent by the corporation to stop details of the deal being revealed.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-36017396

There are some things the French do with more flair than us!

“French police started to evacuate the Place de la Republique in Paris on Monday morning (11 April) after a protest movement that started there extended to more than 60 towns and cities over the weekend.
But the move is unlikely to stop the protest movement.

The so-called Nuit Debout movement, which can be translated as “stand up at night”, began on 31 March as protest against a labour market reform presented by the left-wing government.


The El Khomri law, named after the labour minister Myriam El Khomri, mainly makes it easier and less costly for employers to lay off staff, and requires workers to be more flexible on working hours.

Inspired by the 2011 Indignados movement in Spain, the Nuit Debout is a makeshift camp where people talk about the reform, but also about politics in general in committees and a “popular assembly”.

Music is played, artistic happenings are created and a library has been set up. The Nuit Debout has its own website and media – Radio Debout and TV Debout – and even its own calendar. Today is 42 March. …

… Several politicians asked the government to stop the movement. Former centre-right prime minister Francois Fillon said he was “shocked” that the movement was “tolerated” under the state of emergency imposed after the November attacks.

Last week the centre-left mayor of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, objected to the movement’s “privatisation” of the public area.

Criticism from politicians from the left and right is a reflection of the Nuit Debout’s opposition to the political parties as a whole.

“Politics is not something for professionals, it is for everybody,” the movement’s manifesto says.

“The human should be at the core of our leaders’ preoccupations. Vested interests have overridden the general interest.”

Nuit Debout has no leader and has been wary of support from any politicians. Instead, it has been wooing trade unions.

However, although the unions are broadly critical proposed labour market reform, they do not seem to be interested in a wider movement that they would have difficulty managing.”…

https://euobserver.com/beyond-brussels/132993

“Hinkley Point: design difficulties loom”

” … I put it to the engineers running the Hinkley project that a source of difficulty for the EPR could be all the new safety features – for example an extra layer of containment and a sophisticated device called a “core catcher” that sits below the reactor where it would trap any molten radioactive material if there was ever a meltdown.

No, came the answer. The new features are all manageable. The basic design is similar to the previous generation. We are very confident we can build it.

The problem is that, as the EDF Board prepares to make its final investment decision, there is not yet a single example that anyone can point to of the reactor actually working.

And its development has become something of a saga which not only involves huge questions about finance and politics but also about technology.
Simon Jack has highlighted the concerns about the forging of the reactor’s housing – what’s known the pressure vessel, a tower of steel that houses the actual process of nuclear fission.

This acts as the beating heart of the power station and, in the EPR’s case, would help generate more power than was ever possible with earlier designs.

But tests last autumn rang an alarm bell.

They found that the dome capping the vessel installed at Flamanville in Normandy contained impurities – amid the steel there was a small zone with too much carbon.

This could potentially undermine the vessel’s strength. The intense radiation generated within the reactor bombards the pressure vessel and, over the decades, makes the metal as brittle as glass.

Bizarrely, in a world of gleaming high technology, this area of excess carbon in the dome is referred to as a ‘carrot’ because of its shape.

This makes it sound rather innocent. In fact, it’s forced a major pause. The dome in Normandy is now undergoing detailed investigations.

And the domes that had already been built for the first of Hinkley’s reactors – one for the top of the vessel and one for the bottom – have been returned to their makers, the troubled French nuclear firm Areva.

Replacements have been ordered from a specialist Japanese steelmaker.
So will this add yet more delay to the project at Hinkley? No, we were told.

One line, above all, is being determinedly pushed: that lessons have been learned from Finland, Normandy and China.

Contractors are lined up. The 3D modelling has ironed out potential log-jams. The sequencing of concrete pouring and deliveries and electrical work and host of other jobs has been carefully choreographed.

And many of the engineers who lived through the challenges of the other EPR projects will be on hand at Hinkley. ‘Veterans’, as Simon Jack, calls them.
That could mean they have plenty of useful experience.

Or they really know just how uncertain a task they face.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-35989850

Renewables could cost £40 billion less than Hinkley C

“Ministers cannot keep “blindly carrying on” with expensive plans for a new reactor at Hinkley Point, a group of MEPs has said this week following the release of a new report suggesting that renewables could supply the same energy for £40billion less.

The study by the Intergenerational Foundation think tank states that once long-term subsidies for the project near Burnham-On-Sea are taken into account, solar and wind alternatives would offer significant savings.

It has added that these green energy sources do not come with the added burden of nuclear waste, and would allow the UK to live “within its economic and environmental means.”

The figures are based around the expected cost of building the new Hinkley Point C nuclear plant, which is currently £24bn, plus the Government subsidy of £92.50 per megawatt hour generated in its first 35 years.

Compared with the projected costs of renewable technologies over this period, the group claims that onshore windfarms would cost £31.2bn less than Hinkley, and solar photovoltaic power £39.9bn less, while generating the same amount of energy.”

http://www.burnham-on-sea.com/news/2016/hinkley-green-costs-06-04-16.php

Note to LEP: south-west economy has weakest growth after Scotland and the North-East

“The South West private sector’s economy has had one of the weakest rises in the UK, a report has revealed.

According to PMI survey data, business activity expanded at the slowest rate since April 2013, and growth was weaker than all other UK regions surveyed except Scotland and the North East, which both saw contractions.

The South West also registered a smaller rise in new business, and a further decline in backlogs.

However, employment growth has remained relatively solid in the region compared with others.

The seasonally adjusted Lloyds Bank Commercial Banking South West Business Activity Index fell to a 35-month low of 51.2 in March, from 52.6 in February. …

… The underlying weakness of business conditions in the private sector was emphasised by data on new business inflows, which increased only fractionally in March. In line with the trend for activity, the South West registered the slowest growth among the ten regions to record expansion.”

Read more: http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/South-West-economy-shows-weakest-rise-UK/story-29075658-detail/story.html

Our LEP is dedicated to growth in the South West. Millions of pounds is routed via our LEP to promote growth.

Something isn’t working.

A bling Pegasus life

“Stylish developments for the over-60s are springing up all over Britain. They have swimming pools, saunas, spas and a carer on tap. They don’t come cheap – but they’re a great alternative to a care home.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3532816/Penthouse-pensioners-Concierges-cocktails-place-moor-yacht-Granny-flats-going-glam.html

Luxury care home with cocktails. And how long before these people start complaining about the oiks and “little people” enjoying what will remain of the Knowle parkland?

“The 1% hide their money offshore – then use it to corrupt our democracy”

” … What have the super-rich got for their investment in British politics since 2010? Cuts in personal taxes, invitations from George Osborne to advise on overhauling corporation taxes, the security of knowing that their tax havens will be treated with due leniency.

In my politics lessons, we were taught that Britain was a representative democracy. But what 30 years of plutocracy have brought is an era of un-representative democracy.

With a few exceptions, our politicians no longer resemble, nor do they work for us. Amid a crisis in the rental market, you have a housing minister, Brandon Lewis, who runs a private rental portfolio. You have a former investment banker, Sajid Javid, now claiming to do his best by the steel industry. And you have a super-rich prime minister who vows he’ll take on tax havens, all the while blocking any serious attempt to do so.”

http://gu.com/p/4t8t8

900 sandbags on Exmouth seafront

Hope Moirai build in storm resilience at their Exmouth development – otherwise they will have some very unhappy people to answer to!

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/900-sand-bags-laid-Exmouth-ahead-high-tide/story-29085272-detail/story.html

“Tory local government leader asks Lords to block housing reforms”

“The Conservative leader in local government is urging peers to vote against the government on a number of key amendments to David Cameron’s housing bill amid fears it could force more people into homelessness.

In a letter to the Guardian, Cllr David Hodge – leader of the Tories at the Local Government Association (LGA) – warns that elements of the bill being debated in the Lords this week could have the “unintended consequence of increasing homelessness and pushing more families into the more expensive private rented sector”.

Hodge has teamed up with his Labour and Liberal Democrat counterparts to ask members of the House of Lords to try to block legislation that would force councils to sell their most expensive properties in order to fund the government’s Right to Buy policy.

“At a minimum, we urge peers to back amendments that allow councils to retain enough receipts from every home sold to be able to replace it in the same area,” they write.

They have also raised concerns about the government’s starter homes scheme, which means that one in five properties in new developments will be available to first-time buyers under 40 at a 20% discount.

Critics say that only middle or higher income earners could qualify for those homes, and yet developers will be able to classify them as “affordable”.

“Current proposals for starter homes carry a risk that a crucial supply of new affordable rented homes will be displaced, and despite 20% discounts they will still be out of reach for the majority of people in need of an affordable home,” write the local government leaders.

A number of the amendments have been laid down by LGA president and former head of the civil service, Lord Kerslake. “The amendments are trying to do three things,” he said. “To make it a fairer bill, so that it is not transferring resources from social housing for rent to ownership. To make it more localist. And to make it more workable. The numbers do not add up.”

The peer said he wasn’t against ownership but argued that for many people it was simply out of reach.

But the housing minister, Brandon Lewis, said the policies were intended to help people realise their ambition to own a home. He told the Guardian that 86% of people still aspired to homeownership.

“The hardest hit part of the housing market was first-time buyers and we are very clear that we want to increase supply but also ownership,” said Lewis, who argued that a 20% discount on an average property did make it much more affordable for ordinary people. He also argued that councils could still push for developments to include other forms of affordable homes on top of the government’s new scheme.

Those against the plans believe that starter homes are out of reach for the poorest. Campbell Robb, Shelter’s chief executive, said: “By building homes for people on middle to high incomes, the government is redistributing existing resources away from those on low incomes. This will have a massive impact on ordinary families being priced out of the dream of owning their own home, and millennials faced with expensive and unstable private renting, or living with their parents well into their 30s.”

http://gu.com/p/4t8g2

Neighborhood Plans: Parliamentary Briefing Paper and Consultants’ Paper

Parliamentary Briefing Paper March 2016

Click to access SN05838.pdf

The report referred to:

Click to access Turley_%20Neighbourhood%20Planning_March_2014.pdf

Tax returns

Owl looks forward to seeing the tax returns of senior councillors and officers and is sure … well, almost sure … well, hopeful … that none of them have offshore accounts on Treasure Islands … or magnificent properties beyond their pay grades in London or warmer climates.

“Developer tries to stop ‘anti-housing’ councillor from voting

Story in today’s Times, page 29:

Babergh Council, Suffolk. Developers Knight Developers threatened to take legal action as the accused a councillor of being “ideologically opposed to greenfield/greenbelt development” and having an “ideologic hostility to developers and the planning system as a whole”.

Amongst other things, the councillor was said to have made a Twitter comment saying “Write to your MP to stop the bulldozer and the concrete mixer shattering our country life”.

He is also alleged to have said “Wake up everyone. Did you know that local government financing is now predicated on a bribe to build more new homes threatening our village life”.

The developer said that he should be stopped from voting as he was “incapable of considering the proposals objectively”.

The councillor said “It shows that developers will take any step they can … to interfere with democracy”. … It is my prerogative and duty to comment on policy. I have been consistently against the New Homes Bonus which totally distorts planning procedures and is going to be another poll tax for the Conservatives in the countryside.”

The council ignored the threat and the councillor voted, though the application was eventually approved. Villagers are considering a judicial review.

Reminder: Exmouth seafront poll – most polling stations ( but not all) announced including new ones

What a disgrace that new polling stations have been announced but no-one gets polling cards to know where they should go to vote.

And how can you justify saying you will announce another polling station next week?

The poll arrangements are ludicrous and might merit a complaint to the Electoral Commission. Not to mention being examined at an Exmouth Town Council or EDDC scrutiny committee.

Poll approaching on Exmouth seafront

More information has been released about an upcoming parish poll, concerning redevelopment plans for Exmouth seafront.

It will ask voters to answer ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to the question ‘Should Exmouth Town Council recommend to East Devon District Council that before any further planning applications are approved with regard to the Queen’s Drive development area, that additional independent consultation should be carried out in addition to that required by the applicant and the Local Planning Authority?’

East Devon District Council is proposing new buildings and leisure facilities between the old lifeboat station and The Maer.

The poll was requested by Exmouth resident Malcolm Dodd and nine other electors, and was supported by a show of hands at the annual town meeting last month.

Mr Dodd is said to have sought advice from East Devon Returning Officer Mark Williams on what would be an acceptable question for the poll.

The outcome of the poll is not legally binding on the town council or the district council, which may decide not to take any action.

The poll will take place on Wednesday, April 20, between 4pm and 9pm. All Exmouth residents who are on the electoral register can take part in the poll.

Residents are reminded that no polling cards will be sent out and that there will be no facility for postal votes.

People will need to attend their usual polling station where the polling station staff will ask them for their name and address to check that they are registered to vote. They will then be given a ballot paper to complete.

Any Exmouth resident who is aged 18 and over and who was registered on the electoral register by March 16 this year is eligible to vote.

The polling stations are at All Saints Church Hall, Brixington Community Church, Clayton House Community Centre, Holy Ghost Church Hall, Littleham Community Hall, Palmer House, St John The Evangelist Church Hall, and Withycombe Rugby Club.

There are also two new polling stations at Littlemead Methodist Church, Roundhouse Lane, and The Kennaway Centre in Victoria Road.

Details of one further polling station are awaiting confirmation and will be publicised next week.

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/election-2015/poll_approaching_on_exmouth_seafront_1_4485164

Hugo cuts ribbon for the company that rents his constituency office to him

The Carter family were very enthusiastic members of the East Devon Business Forum.

The Carter family owns the offices that Hugo Swire rents for his constituency work along with Greendale Business Park and many other local landholdings and investments.

Hugo Swire cuts the ribbon for the completion of refurbishment work at Ladram Bay, owned by the Carters.

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/mp_hugo_s_ribbon_cutting_date_marks_10m_facelift_1_4485032

More Hinkley C information

From: stophinkley.org

Hinkley Point C – The Story So Far

Every so often, it may help Stop Hinkley members to have a recap of where we’ve got to and how we’ve got there. I hope this helps to outline developments.

EdeF first proposed a third nuclear power station at Hinkley Point over eight years ago. Not surprisingly, with the Department for Energy & Climate Change backing new nuclear, they obtained planning permission in 2013.

Since then, everything that could go wrong for EdeF has gone wrong. The European Pressurised Water Reactor chosen for the project has proven to be virtually unconstructable in China (Taishan), Finland (Olkiluoto) and France (Flamanville). Reactors there are years overdue and hugely over budget.

Despite agreeing a deal with DECC to supply electricity at £92.50 * per Megawatt, three times the current price, index linked and guaranteed for 35 years, the only other reluctant investors are Chinese. Reluctant because they are only interested in HPC as a lead in to building their own reactor at Bradwell in Essex. British investors have walked away from a deal that looks gold plated and the deal is the subject of a Legal Challenge by Austria to the EU. * Because the £92.50 is index linked it is already up to £99.00

In addition to funding Hinkley C, EdeF have to find 55 billion euros for post Fukushima improvements to their 58 nuclear reactors in France. Their financial situation is so grave that their Finance Director, Thomas Piquemal, resigned because he could not persuade his CEO, Vincent de Rivaz, that EdeF should drop HPC. This resignation followed that of the HPC Project Director to spend more time with his family in America.

EdeF has been reduced to pleading with the French Government, which owns 85% of the company, to find a way of funding Hinkley C so that it can make its Final Investment Decision (FID), something it has delayed than ten times over the last three years.

That Decision has to be approved by the Board of EdeF and it is now apparent that at least the Union members are likely to oppose going ahead with HPC. Even their own nuclear engineers are reported to have expressed doubts about the reactor design. Hardly surprising when the French nuclear safety regulator is unhappy about the steel used to construct the pressure vessel at Flamanville and is demanding further testing.

In the absence of the FID, nothing is happening on the site. EdeF have completed the site preparation work and removed most of the asbestos waste from the ‘A’ station which has been dumped on the HPC site. It would be amazing if EdeF could build HPC by 2025, even if they started now. Yet Amber Rudd, Secretary of state for Energy and Climate Change, now appears relaxed about keeping the lights on without HPC.

Stop Hinkley continues to monitor EdeF’s attempts to move forward, as they would call it. The good news is that the public seems increasingly aware that HPC would be very expensive to build, is an unproven design and would add to their electricity bill.

If the FID gives HPC the green light, Stop Hinkley will mobilise members to protest as we have before.

Stop Hinkley Newsletter April 2016

Download printable version: http://stophinkley.org/Newsletter/16AprNL.pdf

Hinkley Point: Pressure grows at EDF

A board member at French energy firm EDF has said he will vote against its plan to build a new nuclear reactor at Hinkley Point in the UK. Christian Taxil, who represents the CFE-CGC union on the board, said conditions were “not right” for the £18bn project.
More: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35925637

Row over ‘secret’ Hinkley Point documents set to reach tribunal

An 18-month battle to discover the true cost to consumers of building the Hinkley Point C nuclear reactors is to come to a climax in London. The information commissioner has been blocking freedom of information requests to publish subsidy documents held by the Department of Energy and Climate Change. However, it has finally agreed to hold an oral hearing on the issue. More: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/mar/20/secret-hinkley-point-documents-set-for-hearing.

…

Last month, Stop Hinkley member Jo Smoldon wrote to the Japanese government of her concerns about the ongoing disaster in Fukushima. We would encourage others to do the same. Please write to the Embassy of Japan at 101-104 Piccadilly, London W1J 7JT

Read Jo’s letter here: : http://stophinkley.org/1603Jo2JapEmb.htm

…

Stop Hinkley Members Activities

February and March has been a very busy time. Here are a few examples of what happened-: http://stophinkley.org/EventsReports.htm#2016FebMar

…

The Stop Hinkley AGM is on May 16th. Please let us know if you will be able to come admin@stophinkley.org We look forward to seeing you then.

…

2015 figures show the growth of green energy in the UK

The latest government statistics revealed that a quarter of all our power needs came from British sunshine, wind and rain last year. It’s a testament to our world class renewable resources that clean, green generation is now a major player in UK energy.

More: http://www.goodenergy.co.uk/blog/articles/2016/04/01/2015-figures-show-the-growth-of-green-energy-in-the-uk

…

Events

Stop Hinkley meetings third Monday 18 April & AGM 16 May at 7pm. West Bow House, Milton Place Off West Street, Bridgwater

…

Contacts:

Press & Spokespersons: Pete Roche:
pete@stophinkley.org
01749 860767 or 07821 378 210

Local Information: Allan Jeffery
ajjeffery@talktalk.net
01278 425451

Street Stalls:
Jo Smoldon:
josephine.smoldon@virgin.net
01278 459 099

Membership/Treasurer/Website:
Val Davey: val@stophinkley.org

Gremlins emerging in EDDC relocation plans

True to form, EDDC’s relocation project is not going entirely smoothly.

Wednesday’s Cabinet meeting (6 April) showed cracks already appearing, which the Leadership seemed to merrily paper over.

Long-term Exmouth councillors’ criticism of the planned design of their Town Hall renovation was treated with apparent amusement by Leader Paul Diviani and Chief Officers, Mark Williams and Richard Cohen.

Steve Gazzard (Lib Dem) said the proposed design was not flexible enough, a view echoed by his Tory counterparts, who complained of the “inadequacy of the space to be provided”, and were unhappy that “ all the memorabilia” has had to be taken down. They were also shocked at the possible prospect of having to book, or pay rent , for use of the Council Chamber.

Richard Cohen agreed that “Memorabilia is an issue”, and acknowledged the need for “an organised booking system”, and for what he called “the odd gremlin to be ironed out”. But he had no response to an exasperated Cllr Pauline Stott (Con, Exmouth), whose question showed that rather more than gremlins are involved.

It was proving very difficult, she said, to find alternative premises for staff obliged to move out so the Exmouth Town Hall renovation work could be done. (Estimated time 8-10 months, at a cost of £1m) .“How are YOU getting on with finding somewhere to move out to? I’m wondering if you have found somewhere to move out to?” she repeated.

The proposals for the Honiton newbuild office were criticised, too, with Cllr Peter Faithfull (Ind, Ottery) finding them seemingly “small and cramped”. We have no measurements..of what we are getting”, he said.

And Cllr Jill Elson (Con, Exmouth) was astonished that there was no staff café included in the Heathpark designs. Once again, this was treated as a joke, with Cllr Philip Skinner interjecting that there was always the nearby burger bar!

And Leader Paul Diviani’s remark that they were not using “stellar architects” for the new building, added no reassurance for those anticipating sound investment for public money.

More on that last point coming soon..

Who guards the LEP guards? Owl has the answer!

As part of the government’s assurance framework, each local enterprise partnership has a nominated local authority that acts as its accountable body, and

Somerset County Council

(the Council) is the accountable body for the Heart of the South West LEP.

Alternatively you may bring any matter concerning the LEP to the attention of the Somerset County Council’s external auditor.

For this Council, the appointed auditor is

Grant Thornton UK LLP.

The engagement lead for the audit is

Peter Barber
peter.a.berber@uk.gt.com
0117 305 7897.

For Local Authorities, some rules are in this government publication:

“Accounting Officer Accountability System Statement for Local Government and for Fire and Rescue Authorities”

Click to access 150320_-_LG_and_Fire_Accountability_System_Statement_-_2015__final_.pdf

For the Local Growth Fund, this government publication covers some of the rules:

“Accounting Officer: Accountability System Statement for the Local Growth Fund”

Click to access bis-15-183-Accountability-systems-statement.pdf

Should you as an elector wish to examine the accounts of ANY local authority, the National Audit Office has produced a very helpful guide abour your rights:

“Council accounts: A guide to your rights”

Click to access Council-accounts-a-guide-to-your-rights.pdf

Hinkley C: definitely maybe but then again, maybe not …

“Ségolène Royal ducks question of whether £18bn UK nuclear power development will be halted as discord over troubled venture continues at EDF”

The French energy minister, Ségolène Royal, has said that a postponement of the Hinkley Point C nuclear power project was still under discussion.

In a French television interview on Thursday, she was asked whether Hinkley Point would be postponed.

“It’s still under discussion,” Royal replied. “There’s an agreement between France and Britain, so things should go ahead. But the trade unions are right to ask for the stakes to be re-examined.”

Asked if she was in favour of a postponement, Royal ducked the question and said she would not make rash comments.

However, the minister added that while she did not want to “decisively throw the project into question just like that”, there should be “further proof” that the £18bn venture was “well-founded” and would not affect investment in renewable energy.

Scrapping Hinkley for renewable alternatives would save ‘tens of billions’
EDF, the energy company controlled by the French government, has still not made a firm commitment to build the new nuclear power station. Its board is expected to make a final decision on the project at its next meeting on 11 May.

Last week an EDF board member called for Hinkley Point C to be postponed, in the latest sign of discord at the top of the French energy company over the troubled project.

Christian Taxil, an employee director, said a raft of changes to the Somerset reactor scheme agreed over the past three years significantly raised the risk for EDF.

The dissent follows weeks of behind the scenes bickering and the resignation last month of EDF finance director, Thomas Piquemal, despite continual promises from EDF chief executive Jean-Bernard Lévy that the controversial project will go ahead.

EDF has been hit by falling power prices, cost overruns on other projects, and demands to upgrade French nuclear reactors to make them safer. Its Paris-listed shares are down by almost 60% over the past 12 months.

The company is being compelled by the French government to buy the reactors division of Areva, which is also state-controlled.

Areva’s European Pressurised Reactor (EPR) technology is slated to be used at Hinkley Point. However, the first power station to use it – which is being built in Finland – is running nine years behind schedule due to problems and cost overruns. The problems had left Areva virtually bankrupt after four years of losses.

Concerns about the EPR technology has also delayed EDF’s construction of another EPR reactor at Flamanville, on France’s west coast. Its budget has gone from €3bn to €10.5bn and it is running six years late.

Building two new nuclear reactors at Hinkley has been heavily backed by the UK government in order to keep the lights on in Britain. The last of the UK’s coal-fired power stations will be closed in 2025.

Simon Taylor, a specialist in nuclear financing and a lecturer at Cambridge University, said last month that the Hinkley project appeared to be “poor value for money” and it would be best if the French government abandoned it.

“It would preserve the rest of the nuclear options in the UK, as it would not cast any doubt on the UK’s underlying commitment,” he said. “But if the UK cancels the project it could jeopardise all the other projects in the pipeline.”

http://gu.com/p/4t79n

Rural schools could become second homes …

Rural schools are at risk of closing and being turned into second homes under the Government’s forced academies programme, Westcountry teachers warn.

Delegates told a conference the controversial scheme could be the “final nail” in the coffin for many schools and was a major threat to village life.

Members of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL) said small rural schools are the “glue” that bind communities together, allowing young parents to carry on living where they grew up.

Sutcombe primary school in Devon was earmarked for closure last month after dwindling pupils and the failure to join a federation made it unviable.

There also fears for the future of Farway Church of England primary, in Farway near Honiton, after pupil numbers dropped.

“Speaking at the ATL annual conference in Liverpool, Joyce Walters, a teacher from Devon, said the “cost of forced academisation” could be “the final nail for many rural schools that means that they will no longer be able to stay open.”

She said: “Like many churches, chapels, barns, pubs and shops, too many rural schools are now large, beautiful and – very often in Devon – second homes.

“Rural schools are the sticking glue and the epicentre of rural communities.

“Because the parents of those children work, play and shop in those areas, where they may well have grown up themselves and have probably extended family.

“And they need to be able to stay there and they need a rural school in that area.

“Help rural communities and their children and their schools across our very beautiful green and pleasant land to continue to thrive and prosper well into the future.”

Since 2011, primaries at Pyworthy, Dalwood and West and East Putford – all in Devon – have closed.

All schools will be forced to become academies – or be in the process of converting – by 2022, meaning local authorities will no longer run them.

ATL said multi-academy trusts will be unwilling to take on rural schools because they are expensive and inconvenient to run, meaning some may have to close.

This would mean young families moving out of villages, leading to the closure of pubs and shops, union members warned.

ATL passed a motion yesterday to campaign to protect rural schools across the country and maintain their funding.

Proposing the motion, Trevor Cope from Devon said he recently saw four local rural schools close, causing those villages to have “no heart”.

He said losing a school can cause the “sorry death of a village” and causes “untold damage” to communities.

He added: “The first thing that happens, is the shop closes, and that’s the post office as well.

“There’s no children to drop in for sweets and no parents to pop into the post office to post letters.

“The younger people move out of the village because they have to. The pub then closes. This is a rural crisis.”

Ian Courtney, chairman of the National Governors’ Association (NGA) and of a federation of schools in West Devon, said there was “no evidence” that academies would improve standards.

He said there were potentially issues over teachers’ pay following the end of collective bargaining and was not happy about the prospect of scrapping parent governors but said he disagreed with predictions that rural schools would close simply because of the programme.

He added: “I would take the opposite view with the caveat that they must be properly managed.

“I chair a federation of small schools – having a village school is one of the joys of rural life – and we are able to mitigate costs by centralising services, boring back room stuff, maximising what we spend on teachers.

“Partnership between schools is incredibly powerful way to protect rural schools. You cannot try to save every little school for the sake of it.”

The conversion to academies is a mixed picture across Devon and Cornwall.

Torbay is among the top five in England for the proportion of schools awarded academy status.

At 67%, it comes behind just Darlington (70%), Bromley (71%), Bournemouth (78%) and North East Lincolnshire (79%) for conversions.

Torbay Council’s executive member in charge of schools, Julien Parrott, has said he believes schools are “embracing the freedom” that academisation provides.

In Cornwall the conversion rate is almost double the national average, at 46% of the county’s 278 schools.

In Plymouth, the figure drops, but is still higher than average at 32% of the city’s 96 schools.

But in Devon, the conversion rate is just 24%, with 87 of the county’s 363 primary and secondary schools adopting the model.

Education secretary Nicky Morgan said schools are more likely to produce better results as academies, with multi-academy chains using expertise to pull up those which are performing badly.

However, teaching unions have said there was “no evidence” to support the government’s claims.

Union leaders and Labour MPs have pledged to work with leading Tories on Conservative-held county councils who last month also voiced disquiet at the plans.

One of them was Melinda Tilley, the cabinet member for education at Oxfordshire County Council – which includes the Prime Minister’s Witney seat.

She said: “It means a lot of little primary schools will be forced to go into multi-academy trusts and I just feel it’s the wrong time, in the wrong place, for little primary schools to be forced into doing this.

“I’m afraid there could be a few little village schools that get lost in all of this.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Teachers-warn-academies-programme-final-nail/story-29070366-detail/story.html