Cameron’s housing policy thrown out by House of Lords

“David Cameron could be forced to make big concessions to his flagship housing policy after the Government suffered two embarrassing defeats in the House of Lords.

The Prime Minister’s plan to help young people get on the housing ladder by offering a 20% discount could be blocked unless key changes are made to force buyers to pay back the discount if they sell up.

The decision puts the Government under significant pressure to get the bill through both houses before MPs break in May up ahead of local elections and the EU referendum.

Peers supported two key amendments to the Housing and Planning Bill.

One will force those who buy under the scheme to repay the discount they receive if they sell up, less 5% for every year they own the property over a 20 year period.

The second would allow councils to choose how many starter homes are built in their area in a bid to make sure affordable housing for those on low incomes remains a priority.

Brandon Lewis, the housing minister, said the Government’s commitment to giving first-time buyers a 20% discount on new developments is “unwavering”.

He added: ” The Government believes it is wrong that a 30-year-old couple’s aspirations should be thwarted by having to wait until they are 50 to benefit from the full value of their starter home.”

But Lord Kerslake, the former head of the civil service, said the changes would make the bill fairer and protect the taxpayer by ensuring people who buy starter homes repay the discount when they move.

The Government was also forced to make a last-minute concession to avoid a third defeat, promising that safeguards would be brought forward for so-called rural exception sites to ensure that starter homes will not be built on land earmarked for affordable housing.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/11/david-camerons-flagship-housing-policy-suffers-defeat-in-house-o/

“Persimmon facing revolt over executive pay and non-executive director”

“Persimmon facing revolt over executive pay and non-executive director
Investor bodies release share scheme warning amid concerns new board member Nigel Mills is not independent.

Persimmon, one of the UK’s biggest housebuilders, plans to appoint a new non-executive director to its board this week.

Housebuilder Persimmon could face protests over executive pay and the composition of its boardroom at this week’s annual general meeting.

Investor bodies have issued a warning over a share scheme set up in 2012 which could hand out an estimated £600m to 150 directors by 2022.

Some are also unhappy over the appointment of Nigel Mills as a non-executive director, questioning his independence because he is connected to the builders’ financial advisers, Citi.

Persimmon holds its AGM on Thursday, one of the first of the annual meeting season. It comes on the same day as those of miner Rio Tinto and oil company BP, which is also facing some opposition to its pay schemes.

While pay can often cause controversy at AGMs, this year companies may also face scrutiny about pledges made on climate change and any impact of the UK’s possible exit from the EU.

Advisory bodies have raised several areas of concern about Persimmon to shareholders. One, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), has advised voting against the election of Mills to the Persimmon board because of his connections to Citi.

This means he is not seen as independent by ISS, which also notes that Mills sits on the remuneration committee, which is meant to be entirely staffed by independent directors.

The Institutional Voting Information Service (Ivis) – which provides corporate governance research to investors – has also highlighted the relationship between Mills and Citi. Ivis does not give advice on how to vote but has issued an amber alert, its second highest level of warning, to raise corporate governance concerns.

Mills’s appointment to the board was announced in January alongside a series of other changes including the departures of non-executive directors Richard Pennycook, chief executive of the Co-operative Group, and Mark Preston, of Grosvenor estates.

Manifest, another advisory body, drew investors’ attention to the structure of the share bonus scheme. Another leading advisory service, Glass Lewis, also recommended voting against the remuneration report.

A Persimmon official said the long-term incentive plan had been approved in 2012. “This is a long-term plan that runs for almost a decade, which is designed to drive outperformance through the housing cycle and to incentivise the management to deliver the capital return, grow the business and increase the share price. Unlike many other schemes, it extends to around 150 executives.”

ISS does not recommend voting against the remuneration report, but Glass Lewis has advised a no vote because of the structure of the scheme, which is based on the premise that 620p per share – a total of £1.9bn – will be returned to shareholders by the end of 2021. The company has since increased its target to 900p per share but has not adjusted the basis upon which the scheme pays out to executives.

On the appointment of Mills to the board, Glass Lewis has been assured that the senior advisor at Citi has not worked on Persimmon business for three years so it would classify him as independent. However, it will monitor the situation.

ShareAction, a charity that promotes responsible investment, intends to use the AGM as an opportunity to encourage the company to consider living wage accreditation.

In February, when Persimmon announced the higher payout target of 900p a share, it had declared it had achieved an “outstanding performance” with a 34% rise in profits (before a goodwill impairment) to £638m. A shortage of new homes and schemes to encourage house buying have helped housebuilders such as Persimmon – although its shares, and those of its rivals, were among the biggest fallers in the FTSE 100 on Monday amid concerns of a slowdown in the economy.”

http://gu.com/p/4t8e5

“Developer tries to stop ‘anti-housing’ councillor from voting

Story in today’s Times, page 29:

Babergh Council, Suffolk. Developers Knight Developers threatened to take legal action as the accused a councillor of being “ideologically opposed to greenfield/greenbelt development” and having an “ideologic hostility to developers and the planning system as a whole”.

Amongst other things, the councillor was said to have made a Twitter comment saying “Write to your MP to stop the bulldozer and the concrete mixer shattering our country life”.

He is also alleged to have said “Wake up everyone. Did you know that local government financing is now predicated on a bribe to build more new homes threatening our village life”.

The developer said that he should be stopped from voting as he was “incapable of considering the proposals objectively”.

The councillor said “It shows that developers will take any step they can … to interfere with democracy”. … It is my prerogative and duty to comment on policy. I have been consistently against the New Homes Bonus which totally distorts planning procedures and is going to be another poll tax for the Conservatives in the countryside.”

The council ignored the threat and the councillor voted, though the application was eventually approved. Villagers are considering a judicial review.

Hugo cuts ribbon for the company that rents his constituency office to him

The Carter family were very enthusiastic members of the East Devon Business Forum.

The Carter family owns the offices that Hugo Swire rents for his constituency work along with Greendale Business Park and many other local landholdings and investments.

Hugo Swire cuts the ribbon for the completion of refurbishment work at Ladram Bay, owned by the Carters.

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/mp_hugo_s_ribbon_cutting_date_marks_10m_facelift_1_4485032

Rural schools could become second homes …

Rural schools are at risk of closing and being turned into second homes under the Government’s forced academies programme, Westcountry teachers warn.

Delegates told a conference the controversial scheme could be the “final nail” in the coffin for many schools and was a major threat to village life.

Members of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL) said small rural schools are the “glue” that bind communities together, allowing young parents to carry on living where they grew up.

Sutcombe primary school in Devon was earmarked for closure last month after dwindling pupils and the failure to join a federation made it unviable.

There also fears for the future of Farway Church of England primary, in Farway near Honiton, after pupil numbers dropped.

“Speaking at the ATL annual conference in Liverpool, Joyce Walters, a teacher from Devon, said the “cost of forced academisation” could be “the final nail for many rural schools that means that they will no longer be able to stay open.”

She said: “Like many churches, chapels, barns, pubs and shops, too many rural schools are now large, beautiful and – very often in Devon – second homes.

“Rural schools are the sticking glue and the epicentre of rural communities.

“Because the parents of those children work, play and shop in those areas, where they may well have grown up themselves and have probably extended family.

“And they need to be able to stay there and they need a rural school in that area.

“Help rural communities and their children and their schools across our very beautiful green and pleasant land to continue to thrive and prosper well into the future.”

Since 2011, primaries at Pyworthy, Dalwood and West and East Putford – all in Devon – have closed.

All schools will be forced to become academies – or be in the process of converting – by 2022, meaning local authorities will no longer run them.

ATL said multi-academy trusts will be unwilling to take on rural schools because they are expensive and inconvenient to run, meaning some may have to close.

This would mean young families moving out of villages, leading to the closure of pubs and shops, union members warned.

ATL passed a motion yesterday to campaign to protect rural schools across the country and maintain their funding.

Proposing the motion, Trevor Cope from Devon said he recently saw four local rural schools close, causing those villages to have “no heart”.

He said losing a school can cause the “sorry death of a village” and causes “untold damage” to communities.

He added: “The first thing that happens, is the shop closes, and that’s the post office as well.

“There’s no children to drop in for sweets and no parents to pop into the post office to post letters.

“The younger people move out of the village because they have to. The pub then closes. This is a rural crisis.”

Ian Courtney, chairman of the National Governors’ Association (NGA) and of a federation of schools in West Devon, said there was “no evidence” that academies would improve standards.

He said there were potentially issues over teachers’ pay following the end of collective bargaining and was not happy about the prospect of scrapping parent governors but said he disagreed with predictions that rural schools would close simply because of the programme.

He added: “I would take the opposite view with the caveat that they must be properly managed.

“I chair a federation of small schools – having a village school is one of the joys of rural life – and we are able to mitigate costs by centralising services, boring back room stuff, maximising what we spend on teachers.

“Partnership between schools is incredibly powerful way to protect rural schools. You cannot try to save every little school for the sake of it.”

The conversion to academies is a mixed picture across Devon and Cornwall.

Torbay is among the top five in England for the proportion of schools awarded academy status.

At 67%, it comes behind just Darlington (70%), Bromley (71%), Bournemouth (78%) and North East Lincolnshire (79%) for conversions.

Torbay Council’s executive member in charge of schools, Julien Parrott, has said he believes schools are “embracing the freedom” that academisation provides.

In Cornwall the conversion rate is almost double the national average, at 46% of the county’s 278 schools.

In Plymouth, the figure drops, but is still higher than average at 32% of the city’s 96 schools.

But in Devon, the conversion rate is just 24%, with 87 of the county’s 363 primary and secondary schools adopting the model.

Education secretary Nicky Morgan said schools are more likely to produce better results as academies, with multi-academy chains using expertise to pull up those which are performing badly.

However, teaching unions have said there was “no evidence” to support the government’s claims.

Union leaders and Labour MPs have pledged to work with leading Tories on Conservative-held county councils who last month also voiced disquiet at the plans.

One of them was Melinda Tilley, the cabinet member for education at Oxfordshire County Council – which includes the Prime Minister’s Witney seat.

She said: “It means a lot of little primary schools will be forced to go into multi-academy trusts and I just feel it’s the wrong time, in the wrong place, for little primary schools to be forced into doing this.

“I’m afraid there could be a few little village schools that get lost in all of this.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Teachers-warn-academies-programme-final-nail/story-29070366-detail/story.html

Tonight’ Cabinet 5.30 pm – a humdinger?

Relocation … devolution … Cranbrook …

Fireworks? Red faces? Mumbling? Bumbling? Anything could happen …

Agenda here:

Click to access 060416-combined-cabinet-agendasm.pdf

Boo- hoo, Bovis still too poor to provide affordable housing in Seaton, and yet …

Poor, poor Bovis – literally.

Their housebuilding is going too slowly in Seaton and time is running out on their S106 agreement that reduced affordables on the 300+ housing site from 40% to 25% to 0%. So, they have to put in another submission showing that they simply cannot afford them and EDDC’s “independent valuer” agrees. Officers agree too and it just remains to be rubber-stamped at a forthcoming DMC.

http://planningapps.eastdevon.gov.uk/Planning/lg/dialog.page?Param=lg.Planning&org.apache.shale.dialog.DIALOG_NAME=gfplanningsearch&SDescription=13/1583/V106&viewdocs=true

BUT

In the meantime, councillors on and off the DMC, particularly in Seaton might want to think about it before jumping on that ” too poor” bandwagon:

Guardian 16 February 2016:

Bovis Homes predicts further growth after record profits
Housebuilder increases annual dividend by 14% to 40p a share after pre-tax profits for 2015 jump 20% to £160m”

Bovis Homes has predicted another year of growth after reporting record profits, which were helped by rising house prices and the government’s help to buy scheme.

http://gu.com/p/4hxx3

Yesterday, it was considered a “Buy” stock by Hragreaves Landsdown and Dautsche Bank and HBSC agreed:

http://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-search-results/b/bovis-homes-group-plc-ordinary-50p/broker-forecasts

Goldman Sachs agrees too:

Bovis Homes Group plc (BVS) Earns Buy Rating from Goldman Sachs

Terrible to be so poor isn’t it …

EDDC councillors slammed for voting like sheep

“A district watchdog has called for evidence-based decision-making after the conduct of some council members was called into question.

Councillors admitted being swayed by ‘powerful speakers’ when they agreed on last-minute changes to the draft East Devon Local Plan against the advice of officers and on the basis of claims that later proved unfounded.

Votes taken in the final stages of developing the document – which sets out a planning blueprint for the region – saw Dunkeswell and Chardstock added to a list of villages classed as ‘sustainable’ and thus suitable for further development.

Both decisions have now been overruled by the Planning Inspectorate, but members of East Devon District Council’s (EDDC) scrutiny committee have criticised the process that allowed the controversial votes to be taken without any evidence being checked.

Speaking before the committee on Thursday, March 17, Chardstock parish councillor David Everett said: “Chardstock is now – as far as the East Devon Local Plan is concerned
 – unsustainable.

“But the damage has been done because we now have five houses we should never have had.”

The meeting heard how Councillor Andrew Moulding had spoken out in support of a developer and proposed Chardstock be classed as ‘sustainable’.

An extraordinary meeting of the full council days later saw Dunkeswell added to the list with voters swayed by claims that a school was due to be built in the village – information that was later found to be erroneous.

Scrutiny chairman Councillor Roger Giles asked if members should have been debating and making major changes to the Local Plan at such a late stage without any evidence and against the recommendations of the chief executive.

Committee members argued that this should not have been allowed, but officers at the meeting said it is down to elected councillors to make decisions and, if there is not enough evidence, they should have declined to vote.

It was recommended that all councillors in future should beware of taking claims at face value and make decisions on the basis of factual evidence.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/make_decisions_on_basis_of_factual_evidence_1_4483591

Academies: land grab “like the dissolution of the monasteries”

Councils decry government’s academy schools ‘land grab’
Sally Weale Education correspondent, and Rebecca Ratcliffe, the Guardian:

“Councils opposed to government plans to force all schools to become academies have raised concerns about what has been described by some as a land grab reminiscent of “the dissolution of the monasteries”.

Under current arrangements, when schools become academies they lease the land from local authorities. The new plans, however, will see all school land transferred directly to the education secretary, Nicky Morgan, who will then grant leases to academy trusts.

The government says the controversial change has been made in order to speed up the process of academy conversion by avoiding time-consuming negotiations over land, but critics are concerned it represents a major handover of local authority land worth billions of pounds.

Councillor Angela Mason, the cabinet member for children on Camden council in north London, said: “The government will own all the educational land. I don’t see how they will be able to deal with it all. It’s quite an extraordinary power to take. It reminded me of the dissolution of the monasteries.

“We are very concerned. Land in Camden is extremely valuable. There’s no mechanism by which we can be sure it will not be sold off for whatever reason. Those decisions will be made by the government and unelected trusts.
“I feel quite strongly it’s our land. It’s the people’s land. It’s quite wrong that this enormously valuable asset goes to government and then on to unelected, unaccountable organisations.”

The plans are outlined in the government’s recent white paper, Educational Excellence Everywhere, which says all schools are to be taken out of local authority control and will have to become academies in the next six years in order to raise standards.

On the land exchange, the document says: “The majority of academies currently lease their land from local authorities, typically over a 125-year lease. “To speed up the process of academy conversion and ensure that land issues do not get in the way of improving schools, when a local authority’s community schools convert to academy status, land held by the authority for those schools will transfer to the secretary of state, who will then grant a lease to the academy trust.

“We will also take steps to ensure that the wider education estate is safeguarded for future provision, and that the existing school estate can be used more easily for new schools and expansions where applicable.”

Roy Perry, a Conservative councillor and chair of the Local Government Association’s Children and Young people board said he believed the government was acting with good intentions, but added: “These are assets that have been looked after, protected and at times enhanced with investment by the council tax payers in a particular area. One can question whether it is fair to take those assets away from the people who have invested in them and looked after them for many years.”

There were also concerns about the cost of transferring school land, he said. “I’ve been advised in our council that the legal costs alone of arranging the transfer is something like £15k a go. We’ve got 200 such schools, so that’s quite a lot of money. Whether this is a process to try to do all in one swoop [we don’t know], but transferring land is obviously a complicated process so it certainly won’t be easy and whatever route they chose it could be very expensive … We seriously question whether they [the government] have actually got the resources.”

The Local Government Association, which represents councils across the country, has said it is opposed to the decision to strip local authorities of the ownership of school land.

Judith Blake, the leader of Leeds city council, said: “I don’t think the public is aware of this. There are many implications following on from this, not least the value of the land which in the city of Leeds could be over the billion mark.

“We are talking significant land holdings. It’s quite eye-watering. It’s taking local assets away from local people, moving them out of democratic control into a central pot. It has all sorts of possible ramifications.
“How would we ensure that local communities would have access to the playing fields which we have joint agreements on? These are all unknowns. We really need to get underneath and ask questions.

“We are talking with other councils across the country. These are the issues we will be looking at, trying to understand the implications of the proposal.”

A spokesperson for the Department for Education responded to concerns by saying: “We have clear safeguards in place that mean academies cannot sell or change the use of publicly funded school land without consent from the secretary of state and these proposals will not change that – it is disingenuous to suggest otherwise.

“The proposals on school land in the white paper are simply about removing obstacles to schools becoming academies, and there are too many cases where negotiations over the use of land delay this process.”

The shadow education secretary, Lucy Powell, said: “This land grab by central government will have local people up in arms. Not content with forcing all primary and secondary schools to become academies, the Tories’ are intent on taking school land from local communities across England in the process.

“Labour will oppose this costly top-down forced reorganisation of all schools which is unwanted and unnecessary.”

http://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/apr/01/councils-decry-governments-academy-schools-land-grab

“Healthy Cranbrook”? Not for some stressed residents

Exchange of views in town council website after a quiet, green space is suddenly changed into a children’s playpark, when residents were told it would not be built o and would remain a quiet space:

As the EDW correspondent says:
When developers lie about green spaces/parks? So much for wellbeing and health?

COMMENTS (only names of residents removed)

“Brilliant, I can’t wait to have this right outside my house (NOT!!) has anyone thought about the people that live in Hayes square??

I’m great full (sic) that we will be moving soon, will be crazy in the summer defiantly (sic) when its baby’s bedtime

moving?? I know I am dreading it, it’s gonna be teenager heaven at night!! Not looking forward to it at all

Yep! For sure the park by co op is full of chavy teenagers from 7pm have to get husband out there. I’m glad we won’t be here when it’s finished. I like it how it is

I think it’s the most stupid place to do its basically right outside my house the children have been more than happy playing out there how it its just going to bring more vandalism to the estate xx

I thought it was supposed to be a quiet park? Why have they spent all the time making it like it is if they are now changing it?

Sorry residents feel like that, also fully understand. Time for parents to stand up and make sure we and our kids do not make an amazing asset into a nightmare for those living nearby. This goes for existing park too.

Shame developers have to lie to sell houses, we were told that was going to be a nice green area where you could just go and sit and relax and read a book, never any mention of a kids play park, why do they need another one so close to the one they already have!

We got told the same.”

Not healthy to have all these people stressed, EDDC!

Regional newspapers pick up story on criticism of LEPs – our LEP fights back

Unfortunately, no mention of our LEP members conflicts of interest and their decision to spend much of our money on Hinkley C nuclear power plan (several board members are involved in nuclear power-related work, one (Midas) is a major player in a contract for Plymouth Docks regeneration).

“A lack of transparency and insufficient resourcing are just some of the criticisms levelled at the Government’s flagship scheme to deliver £400 million of investment in Devon and Cornwall. But at least the media is waking up.

The findings from the new report on Local Enterprise Partnerships also highlight “confusion” about their role in local devolution deals, and difficulties assessing value for money.

The critical report from spending watchdog the National Audit Office, suggests that five years on from their creation, there is still some way to go to ensure LEPs are delivering the economic growth they promised.

But organisation’s operating in South West have welcomed the report – arguing they have made strong progress in the creation of new jobs, homes and investment opportunities in the region.

“The role of LEPs has expanded rapidly.”

The Coalition Government launched the Local Enterprise Partnership programme in 2010 to replace the UK’s nine Regional Development Agencies. Since then, 39 LEPs have been established, including fone or Cornwall and Isles of Scilly (CIOS) and for Devon and South West Somerset (the Heart of the South West, or HotSW).

The aim of these bodies is to boost economic development at a local level, using funding from Local Growth deals to support business and infrastructure improvements. But over time, the NAO notes, they have taken on a “significant” number of responsibilities, including positions on local transport boards and leading roles in devolution deals.

HotSW board member, Tim Jones suggests LEPs have faced a “whirlwind” of changes in recent years. He says this has contributed to a sense of “doing business on the hoof”, as the Government devolves more and more powers.

“The NAO report marks a good time to pause, reflect and make sure we are doing it right,” he said. “Now that the questions are being asked, it’s an opportunity to make sure LEPs are fit for purpose.”

“LEPs do not possess the resources necessary.”

The Government has pledged to make a total of £12 billion available to LEPs between 2014/15 and 2019/20. So far, Cornwall has received £60 million from this fund, with a further £150 million put forward by private investors, HoTSW has been awarded £195.5 million.

LEPs also have an influential say in the allocation of European funding, in the area. This amounts to roughly £470 million for the CIOS area and £92 million for HoTSW.

However, according to the NAO report, only 5% of LEPs surveyed felt they had sufficient resources to deliver the services and projects expected of them. And as they rely heavily on partnerships with local authorities to achieve their aims, the study warns many will struggle as cuts to council budgets take their toll.

Mr Jones said challenges around resources affect all LEPs. But he is not in favour of increasing staff numbers and returning to “the bad old days of big bureaucracy”.

“As an example, the demands around devolution have been huge, around half of the LEP team has been diverted to writing the devolution agenda,” he said. “But the expectations of government need to be managed against the resources that are available, rather than the other way round.”

CIOS chief executive Sandra Rothwell stressed her LEP is keen to make sure as much funding as possible goes to economic growth “not organisation”. “We are a partnership and we work with councils, chambers of commerce and businesses in developing and implementing strategies,” she explained. “Could we use more [resources]? Yes of course. But it should be proportionate to the scale of the programmes we deliver.”

“LEPs… are not as transparent to the public as we would expect.”

Management of LEPs currently consist of a mixture of private sector representatives and local councillors. The NAO report found that the proportion of private sector membership ranged from 45% to 80% across the 39 bodies.

It says the Department for Communities and Local Government has taken steps to improve LEP governance and transparency. But it suggests the department should do more “to ensure that the required standards of governance and transparency are being met”.

At the Cornwall LEP, four of the 16 board members are elected councillors, with remaining members coming from local businesses and other professions. Ms Rothwell believes that this is a fair representation of public, private and voluntary sectors.

She also stresses that the LEP reports back to local authorities on its decisions, and makes information about board members and their registered interests available online.

“Most of our resources are focussed on running an accountable process, because at the end of the day this is public money,” she added. “We were one of just seven LEPs in England interviewed in depth for this report and we received excellent feedback on our own systems and processes.”

At HotSW, six of the 20 board members are councillors – a ratio Mr Jones describes as a “healthy balance”. He also states that prospective board members face a “very rigorous” selection process.

“I think [the mix] has created an understanding about the needs of the business community, and improved their understanding of the needs of the local authority,” he said. HotSW also published information on board members and meetings on its website.

“It is not clear how LEPs fit into devolution.”

The NAO notes that ministers see LEPs as “central” to their plans for English devolution. But it claims LEPs are often “uncertain of their role within a more devolved landscape”, particularly in areas where their boundaries do not match those of the combined authority.

Ms Rothwell said CIOS, which leads on the employment and skills and business supports aspects of Cornwall’s devolution deal, is “very clear” on its involvement. “This one of the strengths that Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly has in terms of focus and geography,” she said. “So we are in a slightly different place than other LEPs].”

The Heart of the South West devolution submission is still in the bid stage. As the name suggests, it corresponds with the area covered by the LEP, but Mr Jones said their role is as “an observer and a consultee” in the process. “There is some degree of confusion around the fact that it is not a complete deal… but it is being led quite rightly by the local authorities,” he said.

“LEPs are at the heart of driving local growth”

Both the Cornwall and Isles of Scilly LEP and the HotSW LEP maintain that they are well on their way to hitting their targets for growth, but it is “too early” to accurately measure their success. They also stress that the NAO report is a “general” comment on the LEP model, and not an assessment of individual bodies.

The DCLG argues the study “misses the point”. A spokesman said: “LEPs are pivotal to driving local economic growth and have an important leadership role in devolution. That is why we have announced this week a further £1.8 billion through a new round of Growth Deals, maintaining our commitment to a £12 billion Local Growth Fund over the course of the Parliament.”

LEP targets for 2020/21

Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly LEP aims to:
Create 20,000 new jobs
See superfast broadband rolled out to 100% of homes and businesses
Build 13,000 homes
Support the creation of at least 336 new businesses
Upgrade the Night Riviera sleeper service

Heart of the South West LEP aims to:
Create 22,000 new jobs
Build 10,000 new homes a year
Reduce rail journeys between Plymouth and London to 2 hours 45 mins
See 95% superfast broadband roll out
Achieve partial dualling of A303/A30 corridor

Further analysis

Torbay MP and Public Accounts Committee member Kevin Foster: “The NAO report highlights the role our local LEPs play in economic development policy, but with this responsibility must come better accountability. It is right that LEPs can decide what reflects local priorities, rather than have them set by government or quangos across artificial regions that do not reflect our actual economic areas. Yet with the amount of money spent via them there needs to be clear measures to ensure the taxpayer gets value for money.”

Devon councillor and HotSW board member Andrew Leadbetter: “The Heart of the South West LEP has successfully enabled the private and public sectors to work together more efficiently to improve the lives of residents by creating jobs, attracting investment and in increasing the diversity of the regional economy. Together we will continue to improve productivity and growth in the region and I look forward to continuing to work with government and our regional partners Plymouth, Somerset and Torbay in the future.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/know-LEPs-New-report-raises-transparency-fears/story-28993422-detail/story.html

“Democracy: the missing link in the devolution debate”

“Key findings

Of the arguments made for devolution, 41.6% focus on achieving economic growth as the main justification for devolving power.

Only 12.9% of arguments make the case for devolution in order to shift power, strengthen democracy, and increase citizen involvement in decision-making.

Just 7.4% of arguments address inequalities in wealth and power between regions.

Environmental sustainability is part of just 0.8% of arguments.

Only 2.9% of arguments address the potential downsides and risks of devolution.

Local governments in particular seldom consider the impact of devolution on democracy, discussing democratic outcomes less than central government or think-tanks.

For full report, see:

http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/entry/democracy-the-missing-link-in-the-devolution-debate

Chardstock and Dunkeswell: Scrutiny Committee report throws up worrying matters

How sensible it was of Councillor Gardner to make her own recording of this meeting, as it appears the Council’s own audio equipment broke down for this section of the meeting.

What follows is Councillor Gardner’s report.

Scrutiny of late amendments to the Local Plan: what did we learn?
Written by Cathy Gardner on 22-Mar-2016. Posted in Cathy Gardner EDA web site:

“On Thursday 17 March 2016, EDDCs Scrutiny Committee finally examined what went on in March last year when, at the 11th hour, two changes to the draft Local Plan (LP) were voted through. Using clear criteria, Officers had compiled a list of ‘sustainable’ villages, which excluded Dunkeswell and Chardstock. However, at the final Development Management Committee (DMC) meeting for the LP, Dunkeswell was added to the list and at the extra-ordinary Council meeting to finalise the LP, Chardstock was added in. These actions were taken without any request for Officers to verify the evidence supporting the changes.

The decision to include Dunkeswell was made on the suggestion by the then-ward member that a school was going to be built. This was not the case. Arguments made in support of Chardstock by the Deputy Leader Andrew Moulding, on behalf of the ward member, the Leader of the Council Paul Diviani, were also erroneous.

It seems that Planning Officers did not think it was necessary (or even appropriate) to check the information stated by the then ward member for Dunkeswell, despite there being time to do this before the Council meeting. Even more interesting was the assertion by the Councils’ Legal Advisor that it is not the role of any officer (including the CEO Mark Williams) to “…withhold decision-making powers from Councillors” (1). This may be true but surely Officers must give clear advice to Councillors, especially if a proposed decision might be unsound. In this case the CEO did not provide clear advice (2) to full Council that they were being asked to vote on amendments which were both against Planning Officer advice and based on information that had not been verified. He did not suggest that Members might prefer to ask for the information to be confirmed before voting or that making a decision under these circumstances was inadvisable.

The urge to get the draft LP signed off seems to have overridden any caution that making last minute changes might be unsound. Fortunately, in these cases, the Inspector did not uphold the changes and neither village is now in the ‘sustainable’ list. Unfortunately there have been consequences for Chardstock and development was approved on the understanding that the village was to be classified as ‘sustainable’.

So, apparently, Members can make unfounded and unconfirmed assertions and if other Members accept what they are told, they can vote through changes to a document as vital as the LP, contrary to the result of proper process and Officer advice without any difficulty. In the end the Council is accountable for its decisions and they should be evidence-based, but the only recourse for communities affected by an error is a Judicial Review (JR). If someone can afford to bring a JR and wins, the result will be a cost to the Council – which is our money. There are no sanctions for any Members who may present incorrect information to bring such a result about.

Can this happen again?

Yes, almost certainly. In the short term the Villages Development Plan is being finalised. In the medium term the LP will be up for review. So there will always be opportunities for incorrect information to be used to sway the content of development plans.

So what can we do?

I suppose the only thing we can do is to be alert to events like this and make efforts to call them out as they happen; to request that Officers confirm what is being suggested and to ask for any vote to be deferred until this has happened. We have to insist that all decisions are based on sound evidence.

The lesson for Members has to be to not take anything at face value, no matter who says it. Put the interests of residents first, follow evidence-based advice and do not be swayed by persuasive speakers. And perhaps wonder about the motives behind such actions.

Personal audio recording of Scrutiny Committee meeting, March 17 2016 (Council system broke down during this part of the meeting), C Gardner
2. Audio recording of extra-ordinary Council Meeting, March 26 2015, EDDC website (2:42:44) http://eastdevon.gov.uk/recordings/council/eocouncil260315recording

Source: Scrutiny of late amendments to the Local Plan: what did we learn?
Written by Cathy Gardner on 22-Mar-2016. Posted in Cathy Gardner

Housing Minister to be questioned by Lords’ Select Committee this afternoon

” The Economic Affairs Committee holds the final public evidence session of its inquiry into the economics of the UK housing market by taking evidence from Housing Minister, Brandon Lewis, and Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury, Damian Hinds.

Inquiry: The Economics of the UK Housing Market
Select Committee on Economic Affairs
Witnesses
Tuesday 22 March in Committee Room 1, Palace of Westminster

At 3.35pm

Mr Brandon Lewis MP, Minister of State for Housing and Planning, Communities and Local Government
Mr Damian Hinds MP, Exchequer Secretary, HM Treasury
Possible Questions
The Committee questions the witnesses on a range of policy issues including:

The Government’s aspiration for a million new homes by the end of the Parliament and how this figure was decided on
Why the Government is confident there will be a sharp increase in private sector house building
Whether the Government’s housing policy focus should move from demand side measures to helping to increase the supply of housing
What the Government can do to support the building of new homes on public land
How the Government can support local authorities ‘huge ambition’ to get involved in housebuilding again
Why the Government has such a clear preference for home ownership over other tenures?
The Chancellor announced in the Budget that Government will take measures to speed up the planning system. The Ministers will be asked for further details on how this will be achieved.”

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/economic-affairs-committee/news-parliament-2015/ministers-evidence-session/

All previous sessions (this is the last one) are available on the site with full transcripts

“Healthy” Cranbrook, no allotments – developers heel-dragging

Town Council website:

11 March at 14:05 ·
ALLOTMENTS
In response to a resident’s query, here is a summary of the position in relation to allotments in Cranbrook:
Allotments were originally proposed within the Ingrams land application (14/2137/MRES), however, the allotments have since been removed from the scheme as the location did not work so close to the sports pitches. This prompted the current renegotiation of the legal agreement. A revised agreement will still make provision for allotments in Cranbrook. Until an…y revisions to the legal agreement are finalised we are unable to give a definite timeline as to when the allotments will be laid out and completed. Allotments are supposed to be complete prior to the first occupation of 1700 dwellings.
There is still a requirement for allotments in Cranbrook and provision has been (and will continue to be) made in the legal agreement to ensure allotments come forward, but at this stage with no allotments yet approved or available, there is no mechanism for residents to be able to apply for a plot.
See more

· Reply · 11 March at 16:03

I gave up my allotment in Exmouth when I moved here in 2014 because I was told one would be available to me here. This is still not the case, yet this is supposed to be a town that is promoted as healthy and sustainable. I’m actually really cross about it. My inability to grow food here has caused a significant rise in the cost of feeding my family, and the local shop has very poor healthy options for food. The local growers who sell at the market are expensive and not selling what my family need. I can’t even grow food in my garden because the ground is so poor that the grass won’t even grow and greenhouses add to the rat problem. To say that they will be added at some point is not acceptable. I moved here based on a series of assurances about services and infrastructure that have now all become lies.”

Wainhomes Feniton: yet another breach of planning conditions

” … This time, they have failed to landscape the green open spaces (which they were obliged to do in the first planting season after building had commenced), they have failed to install adequate swales (i.e. channels) to capture and contain surface water run-off and they have failed to provide the trees on site and the hedgebanks at the site entrance.

It is all so unnecessary and so time-consuming and has cost the public purse a considerable sum of money. It has also left Feniton Parish Council having to pick up the tab when the nearby play area has to be cleaned up as result of run-off from the site.

The decision to serve the Breach of Condition Notice was not taken lightly by the planners and Legal Department of EDDC. Planning officers worked tirelessly to try and avoid this expensive legal route, despite calls from residents of Feniton who wanted enforcement action to be taken some time ago. After lengthy negotiations which were ultimately fruitless, officers have finally lost patience.

The Breach of Condition Notice effectively informs Wainhomes that works have to be undertaken according to Wainhomes’ own landscaping plan by the end of May, and that trees must be planted (again according to their own landscaping plan) during the last three months of this year.

Parts of the Breach of Condition Notice calls for the swales to be remodelled to conform to Wainhomes’ own design which was approved as part of their own Flood Risk Assessment. Instead, Wainhomes has installed a series of ditches which is discharging water onto the Parish Council’s play area. This area has been severely flooded twice already this year, leaving the play surface saturated with silty water and forcing the Parish Council to remove the swings for fear of accidents.

Never has a development been so distorted by a developer keen to screw every last ounce of profit out of a site. However, East Devon District Council has now put a marker in the sand clearly stating that they expect every last condition to be adhered to.”

https://susiebond.wordpress.com/2016/03/16/patience-wears-thin-as-another-breach-of-condition-notice-is-slapped-on-wainhomes/

Budget: “garden villages” will have at least 1,500 homes, “garden towns” at least 10,000

Good luck with those “gardens” folks!

In his Budget, Mr Osborne says: “The government supports the construction of a new wave of garden towns and cities across the country, with the potential to deliver more than 100,000 homes.

“The Budget announces that the government will legislate to make it easier for local authorities to work together to create new garden towns, as well as consult on a second wave of Compulsory Purchase Order reforms with the objective of making the process clearer, fairer and quicker.

“For areas that want to establish smaller settlements, the government will provide technical and financial support to areas that want to establish garden villages and market towns of between 1,500 to 10,000 homes.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Budget-Chancellor-gives-ahead-new-Garden-Villages/story-28935784-detail/story.html

And just to be clear: “clearer, fairer and quicker” applies to developers, not us!

It’s private landlords that profit from housing benefit – not tenants

“[Dispatches] airing on Channel 4, investigates how private landlords are now the fastest growing provider of accommodation for housing benefit tenants, receiving £9 billion a year from public funds.

…the programme also reveals how private landlords now own 40 per cent of all former council houses, leading to fears of a shortage in social housing.

Dr Victoria Cooper, lecturer in Social Policy at the Open University, tells the programme: ‘Approximately 40 per cent of the housing benefit budget is spent on the private rented sector.

‘What we’re seeing is a redistribution of wealth and while public funds were previously spent within social housing and then used to reinvest to expand that social housing, this is no longer the case.

‘With the private rented sector the money isn’t redistributed and it simply goes into the pockets of private landlords.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3490869/Landlords-making-1m-year-housing-benefits-Channel-4-s-Dispatches-shows-exploiting-hand-outs-forcing-tenants-live-dangerous-accommodation.html

“Town planning gives us the worst of all worlds”

Keith Rossiter in today’s Western Morning News:

“A walk through any Westcountry market town at 8am on a weekday ought to be enough to convince us that Matthew Taylor, the former Truro and St Austell MP, is talking sense.

Matthew, now Lord Taylor of Goss Moor, says our housing policy is sick – and those pointless traffic jams in what should be rights be quiet country towns are the most obvious symptoms.

The worst of the traffic congestion comes from the new housing estates that ring our historic towns like encircling armies.

You can’t blame the people who live in these estates – like all of us, they are just looking for an affordable place to live.

But their homes are not affordable – the policy of allowing only this suburban doughnut of development has driven up prices to the point that in some parts of the country a single building plot will set you back £500,000.

And their homes are not even desirable, whatever the developer’s adverts say. They are increasingly tiny – the smallest in Europe, bar flat-dwelling Italy and Romania. They must drive into town because they have no schools, shops or jobs, and usually their streets aren’t even leafy.

The developers may have promised such luxuries when they were granted outline planning consent but, oh dear, when push comes to bulldozer, it’s “just not viable”.

The councillors on the planning committees shrug: at least they have met their Government-set housing targets.

Each time one of these new estates goes up, there are scores of angry, unhappy people who have lost their views and their access to the countryside. Multiply that across the country, and it’s no wonder town planners have such a bad name.

Is anyone happy? The suddenly rich former landowner almost certainly, as he flies his shiny new helicopter to his shiny new villa in Bermuda.

In a convincing speech to an audience at Plymouth University last Thursday, Lord Taylor called for a new planning strategy in which rural councils are given the power to acquire farm land to build new Garden Villages of 1,500-5,000 homes, separate from existing communities.

Legislation to allow councils to pay above market rates for agricultural land but below that for development land would kill two birds with one stone. The farmer will be handsomely compensated, and the resulting profit will be ploughed back into the new community for schools, shops and other facilities.

But you’ll be concreting over our green and pleasant land! I hear you cry.

Not so, says Lord T. Today, just nine per cent of England is developed. Another million homes in Garden Villages would barely take that figure to 9.5 per cent.

Unlike the present system, which seems designed to create unhappiness, “a new Bodmin, off the A30 and over the hill, would be seen by hardly anyone,” he says. Being smallish, it won’t require new dual carriageways. And being at least partly self-contained, it can become a real community.

What’s not to like?”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Keith-Rossiter-Town-planning-gives-worst-worlds/story-28906598-detail/story.html

East Devon District Council, Exeter City Council and Teignbridge recognised as developers’ friend

The three councils make up the “Greater Exeter” consortium and, along with other chosen council Mid-Devon, ensures a speeded-up planning process in a continuous ring centred on Exeter.

Half a dozen councils across Devon and Cornwall have been chosen to pilot a new Government scheme designed to speed up the creation of new homes.

Housing ministers have selected the six local authorities to take part in the trial launch of their brownfield register initiative.

Under the policy, councils will draw up lists of derelict land and other underused sites which could be used for new developments.

Records will then be available to investors and construction companies to highlight prime redevelopment opportunities. …

… Cornwall, East Devon, Exeter, Mid Devon, Torbay and Teignbridge council have all had their bids to pilot the scheme accepted. They will join 70 other local planning authorities in trialing the scheme, and helping to shape the future implementation of the policy.

Registers will eventually become mandatory for all councils under proposals going through Parliament in the Housing and Planning Bill. Other measures in the Bill will enable “permission in principle” to be granted for registered sites, giving developers “a greater degree of certainty” and ultimately speeding up the planning process. …”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Devon-Cornwall-councils-chosen-pilot-new-housing/story-28901908-detail/story.html

The keywords are “under-used” and “prime redevelopment opportunities”- who decides? EDDC, helped by developers, of course!