Auditors KPMG (EDDC new external auditor) resigns as FIFA auditor

KPMG recently replaced Grant Thornton as external auditor to East Devon District Council.

“Fifa has welcomed the decision by its financial auditor KPMG to resign. The break in a decade-long relationship was announced Monday, months after KPMG said it would review its work with football’s scandal-hit world governing body.

In a statement, Fifa said it “welcomes this change as it gives the organisation the opportunity to work with a new audit firm.” It also noted “serious allegations involving financial transactions outlined by the Swiss and US authorities” who are investigating corruption implicating top football officials worldwide.

In a wide-ranging reform of its management structure, Fifa is looking to appoint an auditor plus finance and compliance officers. Fifa fired its finance director Markus Kattner last month after 13 years’ service over irregular bonus payments, worth millions of dollars.”

http://gu.com/p/4yx7f

Campaign for Free [Independent] Parliament response to Hugo Swire

Dear Mr Swire,
Many thanks for devoting space on your website to the subject of independent candidates. You mount a stout defence of the party system and many of the points you raise, single issue candidates, rejects from other parties, lack of policies and so forth are valid.

However as you might expect, before committing over six million pounds to this project, on a one way ticket, we
thought long and hard about these factors and how to mitigate them.

Our guiding principle is that all policies and major decisions should be made in Parliament by the best people that can be found.

As you know, politics is in a state of flux throughout the Western world with extreme parties and extreme politicians emerging. From Golden Dawn in Greece, Alternative für Deutschland in Germany and Donald Trump in America
the writing is on the wall for the establishment.

Electorates are now looking for an alternative to parties that have long marginalised them and treated them with contempt.

However, the future lies not with new parties;
tribal politics has been tested to destruction. The future will be politicians hand-picked for their ability and accountable only to their constituents.

These people will become accomplished politicians who will
work collegiately with their colleagues towards the best possible decisions.

The end result will be policies arrived at by consensus in a powerful yet democratic parliament, rather than being used as electoral bait on the doorstep.

As you point out, independents are often regarded as political misfits or as being obsessed by single issues. However, all the candidates we endorse will have at least three things in common. They will all have signed up to
the Bell Principles, which set out clear standards of conduct; they will support parliamentary reform to stop politicians accepting promotion in return for unquestioning support; and they will have agreed to recall by their constituents if they fail to perform.

Future reforms may include the replacement of general elections, which have become time-wasting, immoral
and unaffordable festivals of bribery, with a permanent parliament. Rather than holding a general election every five years to change from one self-serving party to the next, it would make more sense to hold MPs accountable by recall instead.

The parliamentary term would become a
settled and productive continuum marked only by the periodic check and refreshment of its Members.

By habitually bribing voters to gain power, political parties have caused Western countries to live far beyond their means. Not only do political parties routinely bribe the electorate with their own money, they are now
bribing us with our children’s money as well.

We are imposing a truly immoral burden on future generations and every baby born in the UK today is already £24,000 in debt. Given the parlous state of our economy, by the time
they are sixteen this debt could have more than doubled.

Those who find work will face punitive levels of taxation; those who cannot will suffer an ever-decreasing level of support and opportunity. It has been known for
parents to cut up an offspring’s credit card, one day our children may well wish that they could have cut up ours. The prospect of a happy ending is fading fast as paper currencies, government bonds and quantitative easing
lose their charm in lockstep with stocks and commodities which are now also crumpling under the pressure.

With a clean sheet of paper, no sane person would replicate our present political system. Less than one percent of the electorate is now a member of a political party and seventy-six percent of that same electorate have not voted for the present government.

However, the system will not cure itself; the electorate will have to force reform by voting only for people
with a record of achievement rather than skilful orators. Staffed by MPs chosen for their ability rather than their political affiliation, parliament will have the views, needs and aspirations of the electorate woven into its
fabric rather than being cynically exploited for votes.

The political parties are now trapped by the very system they created and are condemned to keep on promising the earth to cling on to power. It is now up to the electorate to break this destructive cycle by voting only for people we
trust and respect.

You mention that most people are not political obsessives and may find it difficult to stay the distance. We would say that many have become fatalistic about their inability to control their own circumstances, institutionalised, confused by bureaucracy and demotivated by a system that only gives them a restricted choice of options to vote for once every five years.

You also correctly refer to the independents lack of resources in comparison to the big parties. Whilst this is true, crowdfunding will change that dynamic, not only in financial terms but by giving people a stake in their chosen candidate.

It has to be said that the ‘resources’ of the big parties have often been provided in exchange for influence and favours.

You mention that we have a position on the EU, we have and it is on our website;

“Brexit and Remain are both right in what they say. Brexit is correct about the inability to control our borders, red tape and the restriction on global trading by the EU.

Conversely, Remain is right to point out that there would
be damage to trade and that our ability to stand up to major players such as Russia and China would be weakened.

This tells us that the referendum will solve nothing.

However, no middle way is on offer and we are stuck with a
blunt Yes or No choice, neither of which will be in our best interests. The EU has made many mistakes but it has also got some things right and must be reformed rather than blown asunder.

However, it will take a concentrated
effort by all its member states to bring about the changes that will be required.”

The Free Parliament campaign is a philanthropic effort to replace a political system that is well past its sell-by date with one that is designed to work for us rather than against us.

We are now getting serious approaches from all round the UK not just from the West Country. I hope that this goes some way to assuage your concerns and there is also an
extensive FAQ section that you may find of interest.

However, I would be delighted to answer any further questions you may have.
Yours sincerely
Martyn Greene
Campaign Director.

Another devolution difficulty … Part 1

See also post directly above this one – what a mess.

Councils are said to be getting 100% of business rates in 2020 ( though our Local Enterprise Partnership will gobble up all those due in Enterprise Zones such as the Exeter and East Devon Growth Point).

Looks like that may be 100% of very little … or nothing.

“[A government]Committee found the impact of appeals by ratepayers is dwarfing increases in business rates revenue and affecting growth incentives, with local authorities setting aside substantial sums of money, often for long periods of time, in case an appeal is successful.

The interim report – focusing on plans to bring in the reformed scheme in 2020 – also states that without RSG [Rates Support Grant] it will prove difficult to provide a system which gives incentives to growth and looks after those authorities with particular need.

It calls on the Government to specify how it will protect councils which rely on redistributed business rates and are worried that they will lose out under the new system.

The Committee hopes the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) will consider the report ahead of its consultation on business rates proposals this summer. Once this is complete, the Committee will invite DCLG Ministers to give evidence before making a final report.”

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/communities-and-local-government-committee/news-parliament-2015/business-rates-report-published-16-17/

If Plymouth has to say how much it sold its former HQ for, why is EDDC keeping us in the dark?

“The Civic Centre in Plymouth was sold to developers Urban Splash for £1, it has emerged.

Plymouth City Council confirmed that it received payment of £1 for the sale of the 14-storey local authority headquarters in the city centre. …

… The city council provided the £1 figure to David Every after a Freedom of Information inquiry. The council initially withheld the information, but finally reversed that decision this week.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Plymouth-s-Civic-Centre-sold-1/story-29385867-detail/story.html

How did business-park on-a-Sidford -floodplain come to be in the Local Plan?

From the good old days of the much-lamented Sidmouth Independent News on 25 July 2015:

Cllr Graham Troman (Sidmouth) claimed there was “no justification” for an out-of-town business park which would damage the vibrancy of Sidmouth town centre. He was shocked by the dubious way in which this proposal had been inserted in the Local Plan without any proper discussion.

Cllr Christine Drew (Sidmouth) said that EDDC had ignored overwhelming public opposition to the site, and she was very suspicious of the recent “minor amendment” to add retail to the type of businesses proposed.

Stuart Hughes argued that adequate employment land could be provided for Sidmouth by realising the potential of the Alexandria Road site, and new access could be provided for half the cost of the £1 million pounds estimated by EDDC planners. And funding might be available for this from a variety of sources.

He also highlighted the acute flood risk at the Sidford site which was on a flood plain. The Council’s argument that the problem could be solved by a SUDS system was weak: a similar system at Woolbrook failed during recent flooding. He feared the impact that building at Sidford would have on flooding downstream.

As county councillor responsible for roads, he stressed the inadequacy of the main road which would serve the site which was subject to regular flooding.

Cllr Mike Allen (Honiton), former chair of the Local Plan Panel made a swingeing attack on the Sidford allocation.

It was “not compliant” with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) which gave “great weight” to the protection of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

There was no evidence that it was needed by Sidmouth. It would require people to commute into the town to work. It was “against the public interest”.

He was also suspicious of how the Built Up Area Boundary had been extended to the north of Sidford by officers without consultation.

It would be straightforward to remove the Sidford allocation from the Local Plan: failure to do so would risk the rejection of the whole plan by the Inspector. He seconded Cllr Troman’s motion that it should be deleted.

Chief Executive Mark Williams then advised that this would not be possible legally as it was not a minor amendment.

This provoked an extraordinary attack on Mr Williams by Cllr Allen. His advice was a “biased” view which showed ignorance of the NPPF. He did not have a “grip” on the legal situation, and had not taken account of all the legal considerations.

Tory Whip, Phil Twiss, jumped up to defend the CEO who must be right “because he is a solicitor” and Cllr Allen wasn’t!

Allen, who, in his day job is the Officer Responsible for Regeneration at South Somerset District Council, calmly replied that he had a considerable legal authority on his side – the NPPF.

A rather shell-shocked Council then proceeded to vote on the motion to delete Sidford. It was rejected.

The Tory majority – immune to argument- went on to approve all the “minor amendments” to the Local Plan which approves the Knowle and Sidford proposals.”

https://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2013/07/25/knowle-housing-and-sidford-site-stay-in-local-plan-as-ceo-savaged/

Axminster “Regeneration” Board

So, it now exists …. with senior members of the Conservative majority holding the reins …. the same members that let it get into a position where it needs a regeneration board …. headed by someone who already has two other day jobs.

And they boast of how the have regenerated Seaton and Exmouth …. anyone been to Seaton recently? Where a former mayor has just resigned because he says too much attention is being paid to “Seaton Jurassic” and the Tesco site and not enough attention is being paid to the dying former town centre or other concerns. And where Seaton Heights still sits derelict whilst its owners make fantastic claims about what might happen but show no signs of them ever coming to fruition.

And Exmouth – where “regeneration” has become a dirty word amongst most residents and where EDDC’s chosen partner appears to be floundering with other developments it is involved in – not to mention being unable to file company their accounts on time.

Good luck Axminster.

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/axminster_is_the_next_regeneration_town_1_4566363

Exmouth Splash developer facing problems in Swindon

“THE COMPANY behind the North Star multi-million pound development has moved to allay fears about its accounts.

Moirai Capital has a lease for the Oasis and the surrounding land with plans to convert the site onto one of the country’s leading leisure destinations.

However, the organisation missed an April deadline to file its accounts and has been contacted by Company House over the issue.

Should Moirai fail to respond to the letter, winding up procedures could be started later on in the summer.

But the company’s directors say the issue is being dealt with and the missed deadline was due to circumstances outside of their control.

Bobby Rach, of Moirai, said: “This is something which will be sorted within a few weeks. We are aware of everything and the letter is perfectly normal business procedure.

“We are a fully functioning business so there is no chance of the company being wound up.”

Moirai first took control of the lease in 2012, with the promise of refurbishing the Oasis and transforming the surrounding land.

The new leisure destination will have an indoor ski-slope, an arena, sport-related shops and a hotel as well as restaurants and a cinema.

An outline application was submitted last year and while there has been frustration at the length of time it is taking, Bobby says progress is being made.

He said: “When this is completed it is going to be a draw for the entire region. Getting these things right does take time but we should be able to reveal who has been signed up in the coming weeks.

“A lot of negotiation takes place as we have got everything right but when we have the details that should push the planning application forward.

“It could be that we are on site by next year. When we reveal everything this is something the people of Swindon will be able to get really excited about.”

The two areas which have held the application up is the signing up of partners to run the various parts of the development and the traffic management plan.

Highways England had initially said more work needed to be done to examine the impact the development would have on the town’s roads, most notably junctions 16 and 15 of the M4.

This has now been dealt with and the organisation have said the planning application can be accepted with conditions.”

http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/14489657.Fears_over_North_Star_development_company_accounts__without_foundation_/

“Ben Ingham was born in East Devon. A chartered engineer by profession he has also worked as a district councillor for twenty years dedicating much of hie free time to issues that affect East Devon.

In recent times he has become increasingly concerned about the activities of the East Devon Conservative Group. So much so that last year he was motivated to mount an independent challenge to take over the control of the council. It was this that led to him becoming the leader of the East Devon Alliance of independent candidates.

Amongst his key motivations his top priority is to make sure that the East Devon Local Plan is adopted as soon as possible in order to protect the district from uncontrolled development.

He is also working to create a Development Strategy Committee to ensure that development can be managed in a sustainable and intelligent way.

He is also keen to abolish the cabinet system at East Devon District Council in favour of a committee system where all councillors become involved in making decisions on their constituents behalf.

The following interview was filmed when he visited a meeting of like minded people in Totnes on the 25th May of this year in order to discuss independent councillors in local democracy.”

http://www.educatingindependence.com/independence-in-democracy-interviews-ben-ingham/

Sidford: controversy gets an airing on BBC Radio Devon

Sidford Employment site result of “heroic calculation” on a “speculative basis” , SOS Chair tells Radio Devon

BBC’s Simon Bates’ interview with Richard Thurlow last Friday (3rd June), can be heard on the Radio Devon website. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03vh95v

Go to Simon Bates o3/o6/2016, from 00.45-01.02, and 49.50 to 57.14.

The interview was followed up by a phone-in from Independent East Devon Alliance (IEDA) Cllr Marianne Rixson, EDDC Ward Member for Sidmouth-Sidford since May 2015. You can listen to what she said, from 01.41.05 to 01.47.25 in the recording.

Simon Bates suggests he wants to pursue the Sidford business park planning application issues, on his breakfast show later on.

And don’t forget there are just a few days’ left to comment to EDDC DEADLINE is 8th June:

See https://saveoursidmouth.com/2016/05/26/urgent-sidford-business-park-planning-application-now-in-the-more-people-who-write-in-the-better-deadline-for-comments-weds-8th-june/

Sidford Employment site result of “heroic calculation” on a “speculative basis” , SOS Chair tells Radio Devon

Quart into pint pot at new EDDC offices?

Owl see that the designs for the new offices at Honiton have been published in an EDDC agenda and wonders why there is no scale with the drawings.

Maybe the building may have been increased in size for two reasons: staff were apparently shocked at the lack of space and complained, plus the numbers of staff have increased a lot recently.

And Owl further sees they are taking money from the transformation fund, so the cost is rising further still …

Click to access 060416-combined-cabinet-agendasm.pdf

Old people are a “tension” for devolution – and so is happiness!

From a slide on a devolution workshop:

Tensions

Local and national government perspectives eg business rates reform and what must central government continue to lead

Small family businesses and ambition (lifestyle businesses) and do they have a role in transformation?

Productivity at what cost – not sacrificing the environment

Backing the ‘winners’ v spreading the jam

Other measures – e.g. happiness

Dealing with retirees

Click to access 060416-combined-cabinet-agendasm.pdf

page 91

Greens and Independents learn from each other

Good to see EDDC Independents Leader Ben Ingham talking today at the Green Party South-West conference on the Local Enterprise Partnership devolution fiasco and at a workshop about Green and Independent co-operation.

This is the way politics should and will go.

Radio Devon to air Sidmouth Business Park issue tomorrow approx 7.20 am

Radio Devon breakfast show interview tomorrow with SOS Chair, about Planning Application for Sidford business park.

Richard Thurlow will be interviewed by Radio Devon’s Simon Bates, at 7.20 a.m. on Friday 3rd June. To phone in comments, tel. 0345 301 1034

Here’s a reminder of some of the issues:

URGENT! Sidford Business Park Planning Application now in. “The more people who write in, the better”. DEADLINE for comments, WEDS 8th JUNE.

Consultation on new street trading rules

East Devon District Council (EDDC) launched the first stage of a consultation this week in a bid to boost the local economy, promote high streets and town centres and encourage market traders to flourish.

At present, street trading is banned in all but six designated ‘consent streets’ across the district, which include Sidmouth’s Esplanade and Promenade.

Richard Cohen, EDDC deputy chief executive, said: “We have many sole traders in East Devon, as well as a strong farming and food production history, and we want to encourage these businesses to trade actively, whether it is through farmers’ markets, festivals or street stalls.

“We want to actively encourage opinion about these proposals, as it is vital that we gain as much feedback as possible from everyone involved.

“People’s comments are greatly valued and will help inform the decision-making process for these changes to street trading.”

EDDC is looking to take a ‘more modern approach’ and follow in the footsteps of other councils in the Devon area, which have removed blanket restrictions. The council says an increase in street trading areas would allow it to actively and positively manage the quality of trade across the district, with each application being considered on its own merits.

Mr Cohen added: “More and more people are asking us if they can trade on the streets and there is tremendous public support for events like farmers’ markets and Christmas markets.”

Questionnaires have been sent out to town and parish councils, some street traders, street trading organisations, councillors, chambers of commerce and some local businesses, but EDDC would like to hear from residents.”

To complete a survey, visit: http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/streettrading Deadline for completed forms is July 29.

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/bid_to_relax_rules_for_street_trading_in_east_devon_1_4560308

Increased street trading = increased income from more licences …

Beach huts: EDDC’s numbers don’t add up.

23 May 2016, EDDC Website:

Remaining East Devon beach hut/chalets/beach hut sites vacancies

Beer – three beach hut sites available – join the waiting list now
Seaton – 14 beach hut sites available – join the waiting list now and secure a spot near the new Seaton Jurassic centre
Budleigh – seven sites available – join the waiting list now
Exmouth – one chalet remaining (currently under offer)
Exmouth – four beach huts available – join the waiting list now

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/news/2016/05/east-devon-beach-huts-prove-popular-for-2016-season/

Save East Devon Beach Huts Facebook page today:

“Here is EDDC’s reply on beach hut waiting lists – it does not record individuals on multiple site lists:

Beer East Beach – 45
Beer East Shelf – 47
Beer West Beach – 35
Beer Far East – 48
Budleigh Salterton East huts – 69
Budleigh Salterton West huts – 71
Budleigh Salterton East sites – 86
Budleigh Salterton Police sites – 80
Budleigh Salterton Rolle sites – 87
Exmouth Foxholes – 27
Exmouth Queens Drive – 53
Seaton West Walk sites – 98
Seaton West Walk (former) huts – 98 (assumevthis duplicate of above)
Seaton East Walk sites – 68
Sidmouth Jacobs Ladder – 18″

So, 29 huts or chalets available on 23 May, 832 on the waiting list on 1 June and 832 people on the waiting list on 1 June

How can you have a press release telling people about 29 empty sites AND more than 800 on a waiting list on 1 June!

Wainhomes, Feniton: another second chance, and another and another …

Where and when do ” second chances” end? From a correspondent:

You may recall the following item published some time ago:

https://susiebond.wordpress.com/2016/03/16/patience-wears-thin-as-another-breach-of-condition-notice-is-slapped-on-wainhomes/

Today the time allowed for some of the work to be done expires and yet, as expected by many of the villagers, nothing has even been started. The question is: will EDDC planning now actually throw the legal book at Wainhomes or, as I suspect, give them yet more time.

A heavy hand surely is now required since being ‘nice’ clearly doesn’t work.”

EDDC, heavy hand, developers – dream on!

Save Britain’s Heritage objects to Knowle PegasusLife development

Click to access save-britains-heritage-objection-to-knowle-planning-application-may-2016.pdf

Original article:

Details of the Knowle Planning Application by Pegasus Life, May 2016, from the EDDC website:

EAST DEVON DISTRICT COUNCIL
Planning Application
16/0872/MFUL | The construction of an assisted living community for older people comprising extra care units, staff accommodation and communal facilities, including a kitchen, restaurant/bar/cafe, a well-being suite comprising gym, treatment rooms and pool, a communal lounge and storage facilities; car parking for residents, visitors and staff of the assisted living community; comprehensive landscaping
comprising communal and private spaces; and associated groundworks.

Council Offices Knowle Sidmouth EX10 8HL
Reminder of Save Our Sidmouth initial reaction here: https://saveoursidmouth.com/2016/05/18/visual-impact-of-developers-plans-for-knowle-raises-concerns/

Throwing away our heritage? London-based SAVE vehemently objects to plans for Knowle

Sidford Industrial Estate Planning Considerations

“Dear Residents

Planning ref:​16/0669/MOUT

I hope these notes will help you to make comments about the above planning application. The more people who write in, the better. Please send your observations and ask your friends to do likewise to:

​planning@eastdevon.gov.uk or
​Write to Planning Dept, EDDC, Knowle, Sidmouth, EX10 8HL

Please remember the following:

​Closing date: 8th June 2016
​Quote ref:​16/0669/MOUT

Note you can ONLY make comments relating to ‘planning considerations’. These, for example, include matters such as:

​The impact of a proposal on your property;
​The proposed design and materials;
​Issues relating to vehicular access and parking;
​Impact on trees;
​Noise issues,
​Concerns about flooding.

Matters which are not classed as ‘planning considerations’ include:

​Loss of value to your property; Loss of a view; Boundary and neighbour disputes, or ​The impact of a proposal on private drainage systems.

Planning policies which relate to this development can be found at:

east devon.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy/local-plan-2013-2031/
(Click on The Local Plan 2013-2031 to access this document)

Strategy 46 p.144
Landscape Conservation and Enhancement and AONBs:

‘Development will only be permitted where it:
1. Conserves and enhances the landscape character of the area;
2. Does not undermine landscape quality; and
3. Is appropriate to the economic, social and well being of the area’

Non-compliance with the NPPF
The National Planning Policy Framework puts an emphasis on protecting AONB land, such as at Sidford. Para 116 of the NPPF states that planning permission should be refused for major developments on AONB land except in exceptional circumstances and where it can be demonstrated that the development is in the public interest.

Comments could include the fact that this is a tourist area, plus unemployment is low and the proposed development would require in-commuting to fill any jobs created.

ENVIRONMENT p.182

EN13 – development on high quality agricultural land
Development proposes warehousing which could be a 24/7 operation – noise, lighting, impact of pollution from artificial light on local amenity

EN14 – control of pollution – to residents or the wider environment
Pollution of the atmosphere – School St and pinch points in Sidbury – stationery traffic (especially as volumes will increase)
Noise and/or vibration
Light intrusion
Pollution of sites of wildlife value, especially European designated sites or species (eg otters and horseshoe bats)

EN21 – river and coastal flooding
‘Flood risk assessment demonstrates that the development will be safe, without increasing flood risk elsewhere and, where possible, will reduce flood risk overall.’
NB any increased flood risk would impact Sidbury, Sidford and Sidmouth – remember there were four flood warnings from The Environment Agency in 2012.

EMPLOYMENT p.199

E9 – town centre vitality and shopping areas – THIS NEEDS TO BE PROTECTED
NB. ‘Ancillary retail’ is part of Fords application
Planning application uses include B1 (office), B2 (general), B8 (distribution / warehousing)
…will be permitted provided:
1. ‘Use would not undermine the shopping character, visual amenity, vitality or viability of town centre
4. Amenity interest of occupiers of adjoining properties is not adversely affected by reason of noise, smell or litter
5. Would not cause traffic problems !!! (NB. Lorries already drive on the pavement in School St because they cannot pass oncoming traffic and there are traffic tailbacks during the tourism season)’

TRAFFIC p.221

TC3 – traffic management schemes
,,,’when considering development proposals in town centre, will seek the introduction of traffic management schemes when one or more of the following objectives can be achieved:
1. Safe and efficient movement of mobility impaired, pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles
6. Alleviation of congestion (see E9, 3. And EN14/pollution above)
7. Reduction of traffic conflict and accident potential
8. Reduction of delays to public transport
9. Reduction of environmental damage by traffic’

Please could you also write or email local papers:

Sidmouth Herald:​​stefan.gordon@archant.co.uk
Pulman’s (View from):​​pemedia@pemedia.co.uk​​
Express & Echo:​​letters@expressandecho.co.uk
Western Morning News:​wmn@westernmorningnews.co.uk

Yours sincerely

Kim Scratchley
Two Bridges Road, Sidford”