All singing from the same hymn sheet?

A correspondent writes:

The Talaton appeal decision summarised on “the Watch” recently, intrigued me. It brought to mind another recent appeal, Down Close, Newton Poppleford, dated 29 May 2015, in which the Inspector similarly upheld EDDC’s decision to reject the application but also threw doubt on whether EDDC can demonstrate a 5 year land supply. Something crucial to adoption of the Local Plan.

Two different Inspectors are involved and they are clearly singing from the same hymn sheet. Inspector Thickett is due to produce his report on the Examination in Public of EDDC’s Local Plan fairly soon. If he comes from the same broad church as the Appeal Inspectors then we might expect EDDC to get a rough ride on its housing needs and numbers. Could they be so unconvincing as to return us to a developers’ free for all?

Here is an extract of what Inspector Ball wrote about Newton Poppleford at the end of March:

“Just before my site visit the Council submitted a housing monitoring update purporting to show that it can now demonstrate a 5.45 year supply, including a 20% buffer due to previous under-supply.

I have reservations about this. Following significant objections by the Local Plan Inspector, proposed modifications to the NEDLP are currently out to consultation; the new objective assessment of housing need has not been fully tested; and the appellants raise serious concerns about the development timescales of several major sites relied on by the Council, throwing doubt on their deliverability within the 5 year period. These are matters to be tested and resolved by the Local Plan Inspector. For this appeal, as things stand, I do not consider that it is possible to conclude with any confidence that the Council can demonstrate a 5-year supply of deliverable housing sites.”

And here is an extract of what Inspector Preston said at on 24 August:

From the information in front of me, the Council has not demonstrated that previous under delivery has been accounted for within its five-year supply calculations. Even if the previous under-delivery has been accounted for within the estimated need of 17,100 identified within the SHMA, which is not certain, the way in which the Council have addressed the previous under-supply is not consistent with the aim of addressing it within the first five years, where possible. In the Council’s projection the 17,100 has been split evenly over the plan period, ‘the ‘Liverpool’ method. Whilst the PPG is not prescriptive in stating that any under-deliver must be recovered within the first five years it sets a clear preference for this approach, ‘where possible’. No evidence was presented by the Council to suggest that it would not be possible to recover any previous under-supply over the next five years and the Local Plan Inspector has previously written to the Council to advocate the ‘Sedgefield’ approach with the aim of boosting housing supply.

“Moreover, I have concerns that the projected delivery rates for the new settlement at Cranbrook are not supported by clear evidence. The predicted completion rate for the two phases of the development over each of the following five years is 467 dwellings per annum. However, the March 2015 HMU identifies that there had been 757 completions between ‘summer’ 2012 and August 2014. It is not clear when development commenced but the published completion rate suggests a figure in the region of 350 to 375 dwellings per year over the two year period.

The Council suggested orally at the Hearing that there is evidence to suggest that delivery rates are likely to increase but no firm evidence was submitted to show how the predicted delivery rates had been derived. In effect, those predictions show an increase of approximately 100 dwellings a year at the site, over and above the published rate of completion to date. That rate of delivery is not supported by the evidence presented to me.”

Cranbrook to become a “health town” to cut NHS burden?

The head of the NHS has had this bright idea and Cranbrook is mentioned as a possible pilot town.

The chosen towns will emphasise active travel, parks, table tennis, more sheltered housing for elderly people, mobile and accessible health services, no fast food restaurants close to schools, GP monitored technology in homes, no kerbs, non- slip pavements and symbolic signs to help dementia sufferers.

Good luck with that one, with a fish and chip shop opening near the school and a row already going on about the school playing fields having no floodlighting making it inaccessible at night and cars parked half-on kerbs because there isn’t enough parking. Not to mention – so far – zero provision for specialist housing for the elderly.

The article mentions that Cranbrook is expected to have 20,000 new homes which seems to imply that all the 17,100 homes claimed as being required in the Local Plan will be sited there along with another 3,000 for good measure.

Source: Sunday Times 30/8/15, page 15

“UK housebuilding held back by shortfall”


“The Federation of Master Builders says 66% of construction firms have been forced to turn down work because of a shortage of skilled workers. This follows the Local Government Association’s declaration that the UK is training “too many hairdressers and not enough bricklayers”.

Housebuilders including Persimmon and Barratt Developments have warned that a shortage of skilled construction workers is hitting the housing market by holding back the building of new property.”

The Daily Telegraph, Page: 31 Daily Mail, Page: 73 Independent I, Page: 2

So how will this affect the number of houses in EDDC’s Local Plan?

And what impact will the labour shortage have on Govt Inspectors’ decisions nationwide?

Unitary Devon and Somerset – hypocrisy at its finest

Recall 2009, when unitisation was last on the agenda. Here is what then EDDC Leader Sarah Randall-Johnson (thankfully ousted at the 2011 local elections) said. Recall, the exercise she led (with enthusiastic support from current Tory Councillors including Diviani and Moulding) cost this district at least £250,000 which they all agreed to take from reserves.

The Government of the day back then was New Labour.

“The idea of spending millions of pounds to create dozens of redundancies in councils across Devon makes even less sense now than it might have done in 2008.

“The unitary adventure was an unwanted distraction last year; it is even more unwanted now, as councils try to plan for the future against a background of financial stringency.”

Cllr Randall Johnson said she would be waiting to see if the “questionable” legislation would be rushed through Parliament before the General Election.

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Council-leader-puzzled-reorganisation-ruling/story-11806940-detail/story.html

Sarah Randall-Johnson, the parliamentary seat-chasing Tory leader of East Devon District Council who spent loadsa money fighting the seemingly inevitable progression of a Devon Unitary Council, has said of the latest unitary edict: “The only thing more surprising than the ridiculous single Devon unitary proposal is the period of time allowed for the public to comment – six weeks, to include the distraction of the Christmas and New Year holidays.”

http://www.theprsd.co.uk/tag/sarah-randall-page/

The leader of East Devon District Council Sara Randall Johnson said she wanted assurances that this would not prompt a “land grab” over the borders into neighbouring East Devon.

She said: “I want an assurance from the Government this will not be the precursor to a crude land grab in which the boundaries of Exeter are moved so that the city can expand into East Devon.

“We already know that East Devon has the space that a growing Exeter will need if its economy is to thrive. We are happy to be a good neighbour and to collaborate with the city on an equal basis, but we would be very protective of our borders.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Mixed-reaction-Exeter-decision/story-11817720-detail/story.html

It’s official: Devon and Somerset councils plan to merge: whither EDDC’s new HQ?

“Councillors from across Devon and Somerset have agreed on a joint devolution bid to secure greater control over skills, growth and employment in the region.

The decision follows a summit of county, unitary and district council chiefs in Exeter today, which brought local authorities one step closer to a devolution deal for the region.

Current plans propose an organisation based on the boundaries of the Heart of the South West Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP), with a focus on economic development and job creation.

Commenting on the progress, Devon County Council leader John Hart said the level of agreement had been “very encouraging”.

“It’s important that we present a united front to the Government,” he said.

“I have always said that we can do things more effectively and more efficiently locally than being told what to do by London.

“The big themes we hope to focus on are on skills, economic growth and improving productivity, as well as infrastructure so we can ensure our road and rail network is more resilient than it has been in the past.

“Doing the very best for our older residents by coordinating health and social care and affordable homes for our young people are also key themes.”

The announcement follows the confirmation of a devolution offer for Cornwall last month – the first non-urban deal of its kind.

LEP chief executive Chris Garcia was at the meeting, along with leaders from Devon’s eight district councils and Torbay mayor Gordon Oliver.

Councillors have previously indicated a bid could involve a “double devolution” model, under which the counties and unitary authorities would receive powers from central government and pass them down – where appropriate – to districts.

There has also been discussion of “soft” boundaries which would enable different parts of the region to reach individual devolution deals while still collaborating with neighbouring authorities.

The next round of devolution applications are due for submission in September.”

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Devon-Somerset-councillors-agree-joint-devolution/story-27648023-detail/story.html

Another nail in EDDC’s “high growth” coffin

Shares and oil prices around the world have seen further falls, sparked by renewed fears over the health of the global economy.

In China, the authorities intervened again on the stock market to little effect. Shares in Shanghai fell 1.5%.
And in Washington, expectations of a US interest rate rise dimmed after Federal Reserve policymakers said the economy was not ready yet.

European markets in Paris and Frankfurt were down 1% in morning trade.

London’s benchmark FTSE 100 index shed 0.5%, while the price of Brent crude oil was down 1.1% at $46.66 a barrel. US crude was down 0.4% at $40.95. …”

The trouble is we residents who get buried, not our misguided (to put it VERY kindly) officers and councillors:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-34003197

Mid-Devon opted for “sustainable growth”. Oh, how they must be chuckling now.

Plus, the policy of asset-stripping will look remarkably like a fire sale in a pound shop.

“WESTCOUNTRY TOURISM IS THE BIGGEST SECTOR FOR JOB GROWTH”

And what does East Devon District Council do? Sells its tourism assets to the highest bidder who inevitably develops “clone tourism” of the type you can get anywhere. And gives a councillor the title “Tourism Champion” when said champion then becomes invisible.

And do you think Hugo Swire (busy jetting off all over the world) or Neil Parish (who devotes himself to farming and roads) have the necessary “spine” required in the article.

And recall that EDDC slated former Independent Councillor Claire Wright when she had the temerity to suggest a cut in VAT for tourism!

Non-tourism, big business, preferably with massive development, has always been EDDC’s choice. What will they do now that our local economy is showing that isn’t working?


“IT’S OFFICIAL –
…”Without doubt, those national figures hide a much bigger message for the Westcountry, where tourism is a huge contributor to the regional economy. This should provide all Westcountry politicians with the ‘spine’ to demand the things that this vital sector needs to deliver its potential for the region’s economy:

A reduction in VAT, in line with continental competitors;
A review of the Government’s cuts to funding tourism promotion;
A commitment to delivering the long-promised improvements to road access to the Westcountry”, said Mr Hanbury.
“Right now, the Westcountry’s tourism providers are coping with the need for a total rethink of our traditional seaside product, and many providers are coming up with magnificent solutions. But those providers are competing on unfair terms with Continental rivals, who have far better transport links and lower VAT rates”, said Bishop Fleming’s Will Hanbury.”
http://www.exeterchamber.co.uk/its-official-westcountry-tourism-is-the-biggest-sector-for-job-growth/news/

East Devon economy nose dives – who will buy all those houses?

Front page of today’s Midweek Herald – no link to story on website:

Retirees, probably …

image

Network Rail have their problems with a larger Cranbrook too

As a result of increased patronage [NOTE: WE HOPE THEY MEAN FOOTFALL!!], Network Rail could be forced to reduce train line speed in direct correlation to the increase in vehicular and pedestrian traffic using a crossing. This would have severe consequences for the timetabling of trains and would also effectively frustrate any future train service improvements. This would be in direct conflict with strategic and government aims of improving rail services. Therefore the location of proposed new development is an important consideration for Network Rail and should form part of any initial appraisal of future development sites. In this regard NR maintain their objection to any development being allowed north of the railway line as this would clearly result in additional traffic using the level crossing.

Skypark developers not happy about more employment land at Cranbrook – and they are none too keen on Gypsies and Travellers

Some snippets from their objection:

“Build out Rate

The Skypark site was granted outline consent in 2010 for a mix of B1 and B2 uses (06/3300/MOUT) with a significant number of conditions and major package of Section 106 obligations. The reality therefore is that it has taken 5 years to secure the first B1/2 occupier on the site suggesting the site will take at least 25 years to complete

Over Supply and Viability:

Should EDDC propose further employment land this will lead to an overprovision of space in the market. In simple terms, occupiers will go to alternative new greenfield sites instead of locating to Skypark. A key message that SDP wishes to deliver is the fundamental risk that over supply has on the market. Quite simply an over provision of sites will suppress values which in turn renders sites unviable and therefore undeliverable. This will stagnate the delivery of employment floorspace and lead to the loss of occupiers from the
District as sites will not be prepared, or speculative accommodation built. The addition of further land at Cranbrook will therefore further undermine delivery potential and the quality and sustainability of buildings. There is already significant employment land immediately available within the Cranbrook area. It has been demonstrated in several studies commissioned by EDDC that there is a substantial supply of employment land available during the plan period and beyond and therefore there is absolutely no need for further employment land for demand that could be met in a sustainable environment at Skypark.

Gypsy and Traveller Provision:

We note reference is made to provision of Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation within the DPD list of issues. SDP is concerned that if allocation of such provision within Cranbrook is explored then this would need to be considered carefully in terms gva.co.uk of impact on the commercial attractiveness of Skypark given the Council’s own objective of it being a high quality employment development.
.

Whose “bright idea” was it to have too little office space in Cranbrook? Whose even “brighter” idea was it to convert a new 3 bed house to get some?

Cabinet, 12th Aug 15, 5.30pm)

Click to access combined-final-agenda-120815.pdf

p.53 “planning permission would be required to change the use of a house to some form of office accommodation”

They are referring to a planning application to turn a newly-built 3 storey town house with no disabled access to upper floors into office space for which EDDC is prepared to pay out £25,000 for capital costs and £30K for revenue costs.

It appears that the very little amount of space available above the Younghayes Community Centre is already spoken for and the conversion of this house is EDDC’s answer to the underprovision:

http://www.exeterandeastdevon.gov.uk/retail-space-at-cranbrook/

With Cranbrook set to double, triple, quadruple or quintuple expand over the next few years, one wonders whether developers care about office provision.

Does it provide less profit than housing, perhaps? Why has the Local Plan not made adequate provision? Is this the first of many houses to be converted? Will any of this space be suitable for disabled access? Or was everyone expected to work at Skypark!

Another omnishambles.

A glaring omission …

… to the press release about where to site gypsy and traveller accommodation in East Devon. Cranbrook and around the M5 and A30 suggested:

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/news/2015/08/east-devon-communities-asked-to-comment-on-gypsy-and-traveller-accommodation-proposals/

But there is another possible location not mentioned – the Blackdown Hills!

Wonder why? Surely gypsies and travellers would much prefer the countryside to suburban Cranbrook?

Anyone wishing to suggest any part of the Blackdown Hills as a suitable location can do so in writing to:

Planning Policy Section
East Devon District Council
Knowle
Sidmouth, EX10 8HL

Comments must arrive on or before: Monday September 21, 2015.

Perhaps with a copy to the councillor for the Blackdown Hills, Paul Diviani, Leader, East Devon District Council.

Cost of Freedom of Information requests

A correspondent – “Jane Newman” – has taken exception to the number of requests people have made to East Devon District Council under the Freedom of Information Act. She suggests that the Taxpayers Alliance might wish to investigate this.

We doubt it, Jane. This is one of the latest FoI requests from the Taxpayers Alliance to the government’s Office of Manpower Economics, asking how many artworks the government possess, where they are displayed and how much the most valuable ones are worth:

Click to access taxpayers_alliance_FOI_reply_pdf_-_June_2015.pdf

and in February of this year the organisation complained that the Freedom of Information Act lacked teeth”:

“The Freedom of Information Act is toothless in the face of a local government ‘gagging letter’ – even if it is regarding alleged wrongdoing by a senior council manager – so says a recent judgment by a First Tier Tribunal. It is not good news for anyone investigating the use or misuse of taxpayers’ money by local government.”

http://www.taxpayersalliance.com/does_the_foi_act_have_enough_teeth

So, Jane, probably not the best organisation to complain to about those pesky people who ask for information to which they believe they are entitled by law!

Though they might well be interested in Information Commissioner v East Devon District Council where the Information Commissioner had to take the council to court to get information released that should have been in the public domain. The Council spent more than £10,000 on that case, which they lost.

Oh, and the judge called EDDC “unhelpful, discourteous and misleading”.

Has EDDC changed its rules to make it easier to fire senior officers? If not, it must

“New regulations around how councils discipline and dismiss senior members of staff were brought in this May, with local authorities required to amend their standing orders no later than the first ordinary meeting of the authority falling after 11 May 2015.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=23901:protecting-the-statutory-officers&catid=59&Itemid=27

Don’t recall this making the rounds of the council – can anyone point us to where it is – in location and/or time scale? And is our CEO taking charge of it – surely not !

Pickles article on election fraud

Sir Eric Pickles, who is launching the biggest-ever investigation into electoral fraud in Britain, warns in an article for The Daily Telegraph that the authorities are “turning a blind eye to criminal conduct”.


By Peter Dominiczak, Political Editor7:35PM BST 12 Aug 2015
Electoral fraud is being ignored in the same way that child sex abuse allegations have been because politically correct police forces and councils fear offending ethnic minorities, the Government’s anti-corruption tsar says today.
Sir Eric Pickles, who is launching the biggest-ever investigation into electoral fraud in Britain, warns in an article for The Daily Telegraph that the authorities are “turning a blind eye to criminal conduct”.
It comes after Lutfur Rahman, the mayor of Tower Hamlets in east London, was earlier this year removed from office after he was found guilty of electoral fraud.
Sir Eric compares the lack of action on allegations of electoral fraud to the scandal of local authorities and police forces ignoring claims of child sex abuse in towns across Britain.
Many of those allegations concerned Asian gangs targeting vulnerable young girls.
The law must always be “applied equally and fairly to everyone”, Sir Eric warns.
“In Tower Hamlets, police and council staff failed to tackle intimidation – often in foreign languages – both inside and outside polling stations,” Mr Pickles writes.
“Just as we have seen with child sexual exploitation in places like Rochdale and Rotherham, institutionalised political correctness can lead to the state turning a blind eye to criminal conduct. But the law must be applied equally and fairly to everyone.
“Integration and good community relations are undermined by the failure to do so.”
He adds: “The problems go deep – despite years of warnings of misconduct in Tower Hamlets, the state watchdogs gave the borough’s electoral system a gold-star rating for integrity in inspection reports. We still have a series of tick-box inspections of town hall returning officers that are as ineffectual and useless as those once practised by the now-abolished Audit Commission.”
Sir Eric, who was Communities and Local Government Secretary until David Cameron’s last reshuffle, said that the Government is “no longer prepared to turn a blind eye to Britain’s modern day rotten boroughs”.
His review will report by the end of the year and will examine what steps are necessary to stop voter registration fraud and error, postal voting fraud, impersonation, intimidation and bribery.
Sir Eric raises concerns that the London mayoral elections next year could be mired by voter fraud.
“Despite the fact there are London elections next year, a sizeable minority of those voters signed up in Tower Hamlets remain unverified and could be fakes,” he writes.
“In Hackney, the situation is even worse, with almost a quarter of the electorate unverified and potentially non-existent. We urgently need to clean up these registers. Across the country, electors from abroad are not properly checked to ensure that they qualify to vote when they register.
“Fraudulent registration is frequently tied to illegal immigration, as illegal migrants sign up to make it easier to get credit or a mobile phone. Such illegality feeds through to further crimes, such as benefit and housing fraud.”
Theresa May, the Home Secretary, earlier this year set up a major inquiry into child abuse following revelations about the crimes committed by Jimmy Savile as well as disclosures about abuse in Derby, Oxford and towns across Britain.
There were also a series of allegations about a Westminster paedophile ring.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/11799673/Eric-Pickles-Political-correct-officials-ignoring-electoral-fraud-just-like-sex-abuse.html

Feniton residents can quiz officers on new recycling arrangements

East Devon District Council has announced that Feniton will host a road show on Saturday, 22 August from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. at the Sports and Social club for residents to discuss the trial of the new recycling arrangements which will start in September.

For more information see:

https://susiebond.wordpress.com/2015/08/13/opportunity-for-feniton-residents-to-quiz-eddcs-recycling-officers/

EDDC will not be able yo use a blanket ” commercial confidentiality” excuse after 1 September 2015

http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24024:policy-note-issued-on-contracts-and-compliance-with-transparency-principles&catid=53&Itemid=21

Our officers will DEFINITELY need some special training on this one!

And what a difference it would have made on the Information Commissioner v East Devon District Council case!

New GP surgeries costing councils millions in appealed rating valuations

Good for GPs and local health authorities (who receive refunds) bad for councils.

If this applies to EDDC, it, together with the £7m black hole which is soon to appear in EDDC’s council rent account must surely lead some councillors to wish that EDDC had invested in Knowle maintenance rather than allowing the building to deteriorate so they can build themselves new, expensive, offices in Honiton and massive refurbishment charges for offices in Exmouth.

“… According to Wychavon District Council, a number of GP surgeries had made successful appeals to the Valuation Office against the value given to their property in 2005 and 2010.

The council estimated that surgeries in its area alone would receive a £3.5m refund and £600,000 a year on an ongoing basis from this financial year.

Wychavon, the county council and Hereford & Worcester Fire Authority are expected to be responsible for half of the total losses.

The district said it would have to pay the majority share which will total £1.4m and £250,000 a year ongoing. …”

http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24008:councils-in-plea-for-help-after-tribunal-ruling-on-gp-surgeries-and-business-rates&catid=58&Itemid=26

And independent councillors make a difference In Newton Poppleford

http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/in-the-press/20150807/sidmouth-herald-fundamental-issues-with-40-homes-plan/

“Exmouth Splash” project independent Facebook Forum

https://www.facebook.com/Exmouthsplash

NOT an EDDC puff job!

Meeting: Tuesday 11th August. 7:30 p.m. The Harbour View Cafe, Esplanade, Exmouth.

Re ‘The Splash’.

“In light of the strength of feeling expressed on this [Facebook] page and elsewhere, and the conflicting and uncertain information from EDDC, the purpose of this meeting is to form a group to argue for suspension of the scheme and for a proper consultation to take place.’
It would be helpful if those who plan to come could let us [the Facebook group] know by commenting below [ on the Facebook page].
Please keep an eye on this [Facebook]page for any further updates.”

…”Hi all, for those who are unable to attend the meeting but would like to be involved, we have set up an email account – exmouthsplashdiscussion@gmail.com – if you have any particular ideas you would have liked to bring to the meeting, or would like to offer particular help, please do drop us an email to let us know.”