And still we don’t build age-appropriate housing …

Cranbrook was criticised for having no plans to deal with older people’s housing needs. You can see why:

Devon is facing an “unprecedented” challenge due to a “disproportionate” increase in the number of over-65s, according to a report.

The numbers are expected to increase by 20% within the next 10 years, a report to Devon County Council said.

The cost to the county’s health and social care system could rise by more than £275m over the next five years. The council said investment in disease prevention was needed “to reduce the financial burden”.

‘Downward spiral’

The number of over-85s is expected to grow by 37% over the next 10 years, according to the report. Andrea Davis, the councillor responsible for improving health and wellbeing, said: “We should celebrate that we are living longer. “But there’s no point in living longer if we are not very well.
“It’s when you are in your 40s, 50s, 60s or 70s that you can make a difference to those very late years of your life.”
Councillors will discuss the report at the corporate services scrutiny meeting on Thursday.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-34260197

Planning permission quashed in part because officers misled councillors

Interesting to see a couple of the reasons why a recent decision of a council to grant residential planning permission next to a nightclub was turned down:

The officers who drafted the report to committee had failed to relay relevant concerns of specialist noise officers to members, so that the overall effect of the report ‘significantly misled’ the committee on material matters.
Having resolved to grant planning permission with specific conditions identified, officers unlawfully changed the wording of the conditions without returning the matter to committee. Stewart J held, having considered the case of Couves [2015] EWHC 504 (Admin) and Kides [2002] EWCA Civ 1370, that officers had no power in this instance to redraft the conditions which had been specified in the resolution.

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24310:noises-off&catid=63&Itemid=31

Website for planning whistleblowers in London

Oh, if we had this in East Devon:

“CONCRETE ACTION IS A PLATFORM TO PROVIDE SUPPORT FOR ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING PROFESSIONALS AND COMMUNITIES FIGHTING FOR HOUSING IN LONDON
The space is for those working in building design, planning and construction to anonymously provide advance information on proposed developments, to disseminate planning and development knowledge to communities and activists, and to link professionals who are willing provide educational and design services for those negatively affected by property development.
https://www.concreteaction.net/”

What are the reasons for call-in of a planning application?

“The Secretary of State will, in general, only consider the use of his call-in powers if planning issues of more than local importance are involved. Such cases may include, for example, those which in his opinion:

may conflict with national policies on important matters;

may have significant long-term impact on economic growth and meeting housing needs across a wider area than a single local authority;

could have significant effects beyond their immediate locality;

give rise to substantial cross-boundary or national controversy;

raise significant architectural and urban design issues; or

may involve the interests of national security or of foreign Governments.

However, each case will continue to be considered on its individual merits.”

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/planning-applications-called-in-decisions-and-recovered-appeals

The DCLG has refused to say why it intimated it might call in the Uplyme planning application or tell us who instigated the process.

Will it, perhaps, tell us WHICH reason above it used? And, if it doesn’t – what is to stop this Department doing this any time it wishes?

Is this democratic?

This briefing paper raises further questions:

Click to access SN00930.pdf

A notice to call in appears to have to be made BEFORE a decision by the local authority takes place and takes the place of it – i.e. the application goes directly to DCLG instead of to the local authority. However, it seems in this instance the DCLG simply indicated that it MIGHT be called in. How can this be permissible.

There seems little doubt that Hallam Land Management will appeal the decision – perhaps this will then be clarified.

When roof extensions go bad

Londoners are to be given automatic planning permission to add roof extensions to their properties as long as other properties in the area have done so:

 

roof

Source:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2418937/Lofty-conversion-Tycoon-ordered-pull-villas-built-poles-roof-factory-China.html

And this is what happens when it goes REALLY bad (yes, there is an apartment there):

int_beijing_roof_14viii13

Scrapping planning laws doesn’t speed up house building

…”Planning experts say that countries with zonal systems usually have quite tight constraints on, for example, the design and quality of what can be built on them; abolishing the need for planning permission, without putting something of the sort in place, risks merely constructing tomorrows slums. And more than a few brownfield sites are important for wildlife: two evocatively named species – the Streaked Bombadier Beetle and the Distinguished Jumping Spider – entirely depend on them. Ending the need for planning permission puts it at greater risk.” …

…”Big housing estates may be waved through by central government without locals having a say – something the coalition considered but then dropped as inconsistent with ‘localism’ – under plans to legislate to allow “major infrastructure projects with an element of housing” to be determined in Whitehall. And though the document proposes speeding up implementing or amending local plans, it looks as if councils without them (about half the total) will remain at the mercy of speculative builders wishing to put developments wherever they like.” …

…”Above all, however, the government assumes too easily that freeing up planning will get more houses built and that building more houses will necessarily bring down prices. Housebuilders often sit on land, while its value goes up, instead of developing it: at present they are holding enough land, with planning permission, for 400,000 homes, enough – even if built in a traditional terrace – to reach from London to Rome.

They also naturally prefer to build expensive homes than cheap ones and may well restrict supply to keep prices up. And supply and demand works differently in housing than many other markets; the relatively wealthy often buy second and third homes as investments or to rent, pricing out those who most need them.

So despite some improvements in today’s document, the Government still has a way to go in working out how really to tackle Britain’s scandalous housing crisis.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/11732373/Despite-some-positive-signs-the-Government-still-has-some-way-to-go-to-tackle-our-housing-crisis.html

Planning – what planning? Localism – what localism

So here it is, page 48 onwards (page 43 on the document). Localism? What was that? This was obviously decided well in advance of the election but not publicised then.

Click to access Productivity_Plan_print.pdf

EDDC Tories, pro-development to their core, will LOVE it!

New planning policy to be announced tomorrow: upwards, outwards, fast, faster, ignore locals


“… A new “zonal” system, as employed in many other countries, which will give automatic planning permission on all suitable brownfield sites, removing unnecessary delays to redevelopment.

Power for the government to intervene and have local plans drafted setting out how housing needs will be met when local authorities fail to produce them, and penalties for those that make 50% or fewer planning decisions on time.

Analysis Housing and the budget: what you need to know:

In a budget with a heavy focus on housing, we’ve rounded up the key policies from the chancellor’s briefcase.

Stronger compulsory purchase powers to bring forward more brownfield land and devolution of planning powers, including powers over land, to the mayors of London and Manchester.

The right for major infrastructure projects that include elements of housing development to be fast-tracked through the Nationally Significant Infrastructure regime – meaning the project does not need to go through full democratic consultation.

Proposals to end to the need for planning permission for upwards extensions for a limited number of storeys up to the height of the adjoining building in the capital.

A package to support small and medium-sized housebuilders, including new sanctions for local authorities not processing smaller planning applications on time, with earlier fee refunds.

Local authorities say planning delays are caused by the lack of resources in planning departments, but the government is likely to provide a blueprint for how these planning requests should be handled.

Osborne fought a number of bruising encounters with conservationists in the last parliament, but seems to be determined to do so again on the basis that the supply of land at the right price has been the single biggest factor holding back housebuilding.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jul/09/osborne-tears-up-planning-laws-londoners-build-extra-storeys-on-homes

Crowd funding for justice is taking on a council’s planning decision

“The CrowdJustice website has unveiled a second potential legal action against a local authority in a matter of days.
The latest case concerns Hounslow Council’s grant of planning permission to developer Lend Lease for a residential complex of 13, 8, 7 and 6 storey buildings on Chiswick High Road overlooking Turnham Green.

The grant of planning permission was made “despite widespread opposition”, according to claimant Simon Kverndal.

He has already secured 84% of his £10,000 target with 22 days left.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=23634:crowdjustice-funding-platform-unveils-second-potential-case-against-council&catid=63&Itemid=31

Planning and democracy

Andrew Rawnsley, Observer:

” … What is the alternative? Well, there is dictatorship. That is a way of getting airports, power stations, roads, railways and other large-scale infrastructure built much more quickly. Turn me into Stalin and I can build houses where I like because I have a grand vision of what is best for the nation. Give autocratic power to exponents of fracking and they will have a drilling rig anywhere they fancy. The cheerleaders for expanding Heathrow point to China and, as if it were the clinching argument for laying down more tarmac, say that the Chinese are banging out a new airport every week – or something like that. That you can do when you do not have to be troubled by democratic debate and public consent and can crush communities with the pen stroke of a Beijing autocrat.

Democracy is much more complicated. It is fractious. It can be tortuously slow to arrive at decisions. It can be extremely frustrating to men with grand plans. Thank goodness for that. As Winston Churchill said, democracy is the worst form of government – except for all the other ones.”

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jul/05/planning-policy-major-infrastructure-heathrow-fracking-democracy

Government Briefing Paper: Calling in planning applications

Anyone can ask for a planning application to be called-in. Applications for a planning application to be called-in should be directed to:

National Planning Casework Unit 5 St Philips Place
Colmore Row
Birmingham
B3 2PW

Tel: 0303 444 8050
Email: npcu@communities.gsi.gov.uk

Applicants should give clear reasons why they think that the application should be called-in, including why it is of more than local importance. For further information see the Planning Inspectorate Procedural Guide: Called-in planning applications – England.

http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN00930/SN00930.pdf

Changes to the judicial review process

The (only, expensive) way of allowing members of the public to bring councils and developers to justice:

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=23493:not-in-my-back-yard&catid=63&Itemid=31

Local Tories show their true colours

Andrew Moulding and Steph Jones’s election leaflet issued in Axminster, seems designed to misinform.

AxmstrLeaflet

A close look at the leaflet (above..click to enlarge) reveals some apparent misconceptions and economies with the truth:

Moulding/ Jones: Imply East Devon Alliance is centred in Sidmouth.
Incorrect: EDA Chair lives in Colyton; Vice-Chair in Feniton; vast majority of East Devon Alliance Independent candidates are from other parts of the District.

Moulding/Jones: Suggest Knowle is just adapted bedrooms and bathrooms.
Incorrect: Only the old part, which was once used as a hotel, then as flats.  No serious attempt has been made to market this individually to fund update of the newer building, which consists of purpose built offices in 1970-80s, with outside space for extension if required.

Moulding/Jones:  Move will save £6m over 20 years.
Figures are disputed ( posts on http://www.saveoursidmouth.com may explain why ‘Sidmouth’ is a painful subject for EDDC Deputy Leader, Cllr Moulding) – and some withheld documents concerning office relocation are still under legal review (Tribunal decision imminent: Information Commissioner and J. Woodward vs East Devon District Council).

Moulding/Jones: Why Honiton and Exmouth? “Because Honiton is more central, and Exmouth is the largest town.”
Then why did they previously support Skypark (which could not be less central) and selling the site in Honiton? In reality, a newbuild office at Honiton is just the fall-back plan, as the Honiton site couldn’t be sold for enough money to make a move to Skypark financially viable. And Exmouth has only now come into the equation, as space at the Town Hall has become available. The leaflet makes no mention of the issues of running a split site; nor of existing air pollution problems where the £7m newbuild HQ at Honiton would be sited (no such problem in Knowle parkland!), etc.,etc. 

Moulding/Jones; Why is Local Plan taking so long? “Because we want to get it right”
Or is it because EDDC are struggling, having got it so wrong in the past, and exasperating the Inspector, who rejected the previous one? (Remember the 53 ‘minor changes’ which the Inspector found to be ‘major’? SIN blogged the story: https://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2013/11/30/sum-thing-amiss/)

Moulding/ Jones: Why so much new housing in Axminster? “Because you wanted it!!”
Who are ‘you’? Does it embellish the town and help it to thrive? Or is it symptomatic of consequences when deciding where to build the massive number of new houses EDDC has chosen to opt for?

Moulding/Jones:  Do you have a plan for the future of Axminster. “Yes, we have a vision.”
Who are ‘we’, and has the vision, with no neighbourhood plan yet in place, been led by speculative development?

This leaflet, along with quotes from Hugo Swire in the local press yesterday (https://eastdevonwatch.org/2015/05/02/east-devon-alliance-responds-to-hugo-swire-misinformation/), show tired tactics which are looking rather stale. On May 7th, East Devon voters may well show they’ve had enough of them.

Who shapes our future?

Anyone who’s been to the new town of Cranbrook lately, will be interested in this link: http://futuresforumvgs.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/where-we-live-now-new-town-home-town.html

Was it Churchill who once said, we shape our buildings and our buildings shape us…

Protest meeting tomorrow at Knowle 3 pm Community Voice on Planning

Many speakers including local prospective parliamentary candidates – see links in Dates for Your Diary for more information.

A Good Day Out! And the more placards the better!

EDDC seeks “planning solicit

We thought we had one – Mr Gordon Lennox – but he now also appears to be Monitoring Officer (temporary or permanent – who knows) since the last one we (temporarily) shared with South Somerset seems to have gone – all very confusing!

Or perhaps EDDC is expecting SO much work with the thousands of houses to be built the planning department must expand.

And “Strategic Lead – Legal, licensing and Democratic Services” is that Mr Gordon Lennox too? Or someone else? Only recently EDDC made one of its most senior officers redundant and another couple quietly drifted away – are we back to boom after bust?

Joining our talented legal team, you will support our Strategic Lead (Legal, Licensing and Democratic Services) in providing a highly efficient and effective legal service. You will offer your first-class legal advice in planning and listed building law as well as administrative law to our council officers, committees and sub-committees. You will draft, negotiate and complete related legal documents and you will represent the Council at court and in planning appeals.”

http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_jobs&task=detail_job&id=17441:planning-solicitor&Itemid=

Westpoint- Planning application to remove exemption for Speedway/Timed Car Trials. Public Meeting planned 15th April (tbc).

New concerns for Save Clyst St Mary campaigners, outlined in this message today from organiser Gaeron Kayley:

‘ In case you weren’t aware, Westpoint has applied for an exemption to its planning permission to allow timed car trials on its site. Obviously this is a concern as it is likely to be very noisy and could potentially cause additional pollution to the area too..

This is the link to the planning application (15/0139/VAR):
https://planning.eastdevon.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=NIGLWSGHHHM00

As you can see, there is barely any info about what it actually entails at present

Here are the links to the company’s website:
http://www.bhpperformanceshow.com/

and

http://www.bhpperformanceshow.com/gallery

It might also be useful to have a look at their own clip on YouTube:

Although the application is for one day, we fear this will be a sliding slope and that there might be additional requests for more days – hence the reason we have brought it to your attention.

Having spoken to The Parish Council, I can confirm there will be a public meeting in the School Hall on Wednesday 15th April Starting at 19.30 (This date and time is subject to confirmation once the school has re-opened).

On a different note, we understand there have been some recent changes in personnel at East Devon District Council, including a new Head of Planning. However, at present, there is no clarification of this on their website. To save time and ensure that we can have direct contact with the right people, if and when this is required,we would be grateful if any member of our group working for EDDC could contact us to confirm appointments and contact details. This will ensure we can get in contact with the right people and not disturb those unconnected with our interests!’
<!

From the archives: the siege of Newton Poppleford

Wherin EDDC had to be threatened with a judicial review before they would admit to “errors”

https://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/s=newton+poppleford&submit=Search

and Freedom of Speech meant freedom to attempt to gag a councillor:

https://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2013/06/25/another-month-another-chaotic-planning-meeting-at-newton-poppleford/

and here:

https://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/?s=Graham+Salter&submit=Search

No action was taken against Councillor Salter as all complaints were found to be groundless and unactionable in law.

The eleventh hour: why you should vote Independent

For those who do not click on links, here is the text of Paul Arnott of the independent East Devon Alliance’s hopes for change at the crucial district elections as they appear in the current Devonshire magazine:

My first published book about fifteen years ago concerned a subject with a very boring name – adoption – with its potentially dull backdrop of social services and filing cabinets. The only way to animate it was by my personal story. I did not know until my mid-thirties that I had been illegitimately conceived in 1961 by a scared young Irish couple in London, who later went on to marry in Dublin and have four more children, my full-blood siblings. I was a devoted Englishman who it transpired had flesh and blood from County Carlow.

Now here is another boring word – planning. How to persuade a reader that at its dark heart may be the seedbed for the rebirth of our moribund national democracy? It has to be me again, for which I apologise. I was diagnosed with leukaemia four years ago, had a bone marrow transplant three years ago, am fully recovered and should be doing something quiet and nurturing with this reborn life – learning to paint, taking up the harp etc.

Instead I find myself chairman of a movement called the East Devon Alliance, which is supporting a network of Independent candidates to fight the majority of ward seats in the district election happening on the same day as those for Parliament.

It is the biggest Independent effort in British electoral history, more than 40 individual, plucky people who have decided they cannot trust our beloved environment to the whims of a one-party council dominated by pals of developers any longer. They have realised, in supposedly sleepy East Devon, that democracy can only be revived by entirely changing the guard. Indeed, perhaps in this roots-up path may be found the eventual route to national reform?

When I first fell amongst these lovely people, their horror stories from about twenty towns and villages were of a piece with my experience before being ill, making J.K Rowling’s A Casual Vacancy seem like a Year One show-and-tell project. To all of us, it was now beyond doubt that many dominant parish, town and district councillors (and sometimes clerks) mainly sought office to grease the wheels for planning consents for their allies.

Dysfunction was endemic in even the loveliest communities. Rigged agendas, bullying in meetings, and fixed minutes, were all product of the ugly elephant in too many civic rooms. In 2011, the coalition government, announced that in Planning the mantra would now be a “presumption in favour of development”.

It was game on for many well-placed councillors. The only protection against ill-conceived building in the wrong places (key agricultural land) for the wrong people (we need low-cost housing, not executive homes) was for a district to have an adopted (that boring word, again) Local Plan in place. By extraordinary chance, East Devon District Council has managed its affairs in such a way that after an unopposed four year term of office, in a relatively simple area to deal with, it has no such Local Plan at all. Naked in the conference chamber.

Instead, as in the Ireland of my genetic forebears, there is a rush for re-zoning arable for industrial estates, and a gross over-inflation of need at the upper end of the housing market. Of equal concern, there is no positive vision either. Nimbys is the stale acronym thrown at the likes of us. This is unjust.

All of us have identified adjacent to our towns and villages former factories or farmyards which are ideally located for brownfield development, many derelict for years.

Why isn’t the District Council making a united effort to build on these? Is it because this would reduce the need to build on the greenfield locations owned or agented by councillors’ pals, who have long favoured decisions to be made in skittle alleys, lodges and clubs.

We are now at the eleventh hour. I emerged from five months incarceration in a sterile, isolated hospital room to recuperate not in the pollution and tarmac of the London where I was born, but the valleys and hills of the county I love, the landscape which sustains our two essential industries of agriculture and tourism. I, and my fellow Independents, cherish and understand the meaning of stewardship – that we are but passing through. And if we can take back the reins of our afflicted district from the one-party group who now have hold, it is not too late for East Devon to become governed not as the land for robber barons but for a new era of stewards protecting democracy and environment alike.

Click to access devonshire_magazine_april-may_2015-return_of_the_good_stewards.pdf

Marketing the Jurassic Coast…

….is a complicated business.
Latest aerial views keep us up to date with what’s happening, with EDDC planners’ approval:
http://futuresforumvgs.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/comparing-visions-for-development-of.html

And bodies such as the Environment Agency alert us to some of the problems..Has this one been solved?? : https://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2013/07/16/east-devon-beaches-at-seaton-ladram-bay-and-budleigh-salterton-too-polluted-to-swim-at/