Local Plan: Save our Sidmouth press release

“The following press release has been issued (20/01/2016), on behalf of Save Our Sidmouth:

‘Response to East Devon District Council’s update on the LOCAL PLAN
The Inspector’s recommendation that the Local Plan should include both the Employment site at Sidford and a Housing site at the Knowle for 50 dwellings is a huge disappointment. It ignores the clear wishes of a large proportion of Sidmouth residents, Sidmouth Town Council and all the Sidmouth EDDC councillors.

At the Knowle, the decision to allow 50 houses on the site instead of continuing local employment for 400 professional staff will in economic terms, severely affect the town, as well as have a detrimental effect on the Parkland. In view of his decision, it will be interesting to hear how EDDC will reconcile this with the potential developer’s desire to build over 120 dwellings on the site.

At Sidford, we know that the decision to include the site is flawed, and is based on fallacious data. There is evidence to suggest that EDDC and their now disgraced Business Forum, canvassed developers for potential sites, and then manufactured the rationale and analysis to support their internally chosen site. EDDC let the proponents of that site produce “evidence” to support it, and never questioned the data. This included flawed traffic figures, no real visual analysis, and unsupported flood analysis, amongst other deficiencies. The Employment allocation arises solely because of the commercial pressures of one landowner and a business in the town.

Later, EDDC, under pressure from Sidmouth Councillors, saw sense and accepted that the site should not have been included. They decided to omit the Employment allocation from the third and final submission. Unfortunately the Inspector had ruled that no revisions were allowed at that late stage.
Thus the town may well end up with having an obtrusive, flood-prone, traffic- congesting group of sheds on its doorstep. Or the possibility of a large retail park, which will destroy the nature of the town forever. Moreover, the residents of Sidford will now have blight on their homes because of the impending development and a continuing worry about traffic and flooding.

Sidmouth does not need a further Employment site; the town already has one at Alexandria Road, which with a modicum of attention could accommodate all the minor employment opportunities that is needed.

We are extremely grateful for all the support that Sid Valley residents have given in time and money over the last few years, and they may rest assured that although we are naturally disappointed with the outcome, we have not given up.

R J Thurlow. Chair, Save Our Sidmouth’

http://saveoursidmouth.com/2016/01/21/inspectors-recommendations-for-sidmouth-a-huge-disappointment/

This is followed on the website by illustrative photographs.

Sidford Fields: a suggestion to DCC and EDDC Councillor Hughes

… that he uses some of his council Locality Budget £10,000 per year at DCC) and/or Parishes Together funding to pay for a pollution measuring station on the Sidford-Sidbury road, to get baseline measurements of current and future pollution figures.

As Highways councillor for Devon this should be just up his street, so to speak.

Money where mouth is?

Masterplans: EDDC’s new Achilles heels

Exmouth, Axminster and Cranbrook – all needing new Masterplans in our new Local Plan, according to the Inspector. And Sidmouth needing one at its eastern end according to EDDC.

Given the omnishambles EDDC has made of the new local plan – at least 8 years in the making, one false start wasting more than two years, and two rejected drafts plus the interference of the East Devon Business Forum – what are the odds of our current councillors and officers getting these new Masterplans right?

Below are the challenges they face. It will take more than crossed fingers to see these through … especially as, with so many of them, the councillors and officers are at odds with the electorate about what is acceptable and appropriate.

A new commuter town, a rural town massively expanding , and two seaside towns fighting to retain their identities … and all with AONBs, important wildlife sites and the World Heritage Coast to accommodate, not to mention thousands of homes and industries and their infrastructure to create under an “asset sweating” ruling party.

CRANBROOK

On Cranbrook, Diviani says this in a press release today:

“The Cranbrook masterplan, which is currently in production, will put some meat on the bones of these policies and will provide a strong vision and guide to future development at Cranbrook to ensure that it becomes an attractive, vibrant and sustainable modern town.”

http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/inspector_recognises_importance_of_further_development_at_cranbrook_1_4385501

Remember that the first plan of Cranbrook neglected to plan for appropriate health facilities, it did not include enough shops, not enough green spaces and a football pitch that could not be used in the evenings because it was no-one’s responsibility to pay for or maintain floodlights and where roads are still unadopted.

The highly critical DCC report is here:

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2015/09/14/what-mainstream-media-isnt-telling-you-about-that-dcc-cranbrook-report/

AXMINSTER

On Axminster, he says:

“a North South relief road for the town will be delivered as part of this development linking Chard Road (A358) to Lyme Road (B261). A Masterplan will be required for this site and development will be subject to improved public transport provision.”

and

Prior to the granting of planning permission for any major residential schemes at Axminster, the Council will agree, with the Environment Agency and Natural England, a timetable for the review or development of a Nutrient Management Plan for the River Axe.

This plan will set out detailed actions that allow for new growth at Axminster to progress with adequate mitigation in place to negate the additional phosphate load that would be caused. The Nutrient Management Plan will work in collaboration with the diffuse Water Pollution Plan, and will seek to restore water quality for the River Axe SAC to enable it to meet its conservation objectives within a specified timescale, and in accordance with commitments to European Directives.

Depending on the findings of the plan, growth will only proceed in accordance with the mitigation delivery set out within that plan. Growth at Axminster will also be informed by the current status of the relevant discharge consents for waste water treatment works, and any upgrade required to support new growth will be the subject of Habitats Regulations Assessment prior to planning permission being given. The determination of such development applications will be informed by Habitat Regulations Assessment that takes account of the consent requirements.”

EXMOUTH

Oh, where to start with Exmouth. Suffice to say the Inspector says:

The Exmouth Seafront is recognised as a key asset for the town and the Council is a key driver in its further enhancement. To this end, along with Devon County Council, the District Council appointed LDA Design to undertake a town centre and waterfront design study to identify opportunities for renewal and improvement in the physical, economic and environmental quality of the town.

The Final LDA study5 and recommendations and conclusion have been endorsed by the Council. The implementation of some projects in the Masterplan is underway but the Council also recognises that it is time to re-evaluate the Masterplan. The future intention is that a new or refreshed Masterplan will be produced with this becoming a Supplementary planning Document (SPD).”

Hard to see how this can be worked into what seems now to be a fait accompli with the developer (though the Inspector fired several warning shots about protecting the environs of the Exe Estuary.

SIDMOUTH

Mr Thickett says:

Land at Port Royal Site – Land for residential use is allocated for 30 homes (site ED03 (this site will incorporate mixed use redevelopment to include housing and community, commercial, recreation and other uses).”

Sidford Fields employment land: who knew what and when?

Leading up to the district council elections Councillor Stuart Hughes and (now ex) Councillor Troman made much of what they considered a successful effort to remove the Sidford Fields employment site from the Local Plan.

It was covered initially on this blog and here:

25 March 2015:

The Development Management Committee (DMC) rejected the amendment, but agreed to send a note to the Inspector advising him of the of the unprecedented number of representations that had been received about the Sidford Fields site, and pointing out the lack of need and environmental concerns, particularly flooding and traffic issues.

DMC refuses to amend Local Plan proposal for Sidford.

One day later, we read this:

“By a narrow margin of, we are told, 18 votes to 13, District Councillors at today’s Extra Ordinary meeting at Knowle, have decided to drop the controversial proposal for a 12 acre employment site at Sidford Fields.
Congratulations and thanks to Sidmouth Councillors Stuart Hughes and Graham Troman for proposing the amendment. As a recent commentator on this blog noted recently, Cllr Troman had already argued strongly at the Development Management Committee, that the Sidford site was not justified by the council’s own formulae.”

Proposed Sidford Business Park removed from Local Plan

However, CEO Mark Williams made his position clear here:

“The inspector has already heard everything we have said and is yet to tell us what his view is on that part of the application. He may recommend that this site is not suitable and should be removed. It’s his decision now, not yours.

“It’s your funeral if you want to take it out.”

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2015/04/11/sidford-business-park/

Hughes made this comment in his Devon Conservatives blog for 16 April 2015:

“There appears to be some excellent news for Sidmouth and Sidford in that the Sidford Business/Retail Park that Graham Troman and I were successful in getting removed from the draft plan on the 26th March isn’t included …”

http://www.devonconservative.org.uk/hughesreport.htm

On this basis – choosing to ignore the warning of Williams – people might have been prepared to vote for them on these comments alone.

QUESTIONS:

Did EDDC officers send (on behalf of the Development Management Committee) the extra information about the Sidford Fields site, pointing out the lack of need and environmental concerns, and flooding and traffic issue at the relevant time or at all?

As this is cited as a “main modification” can it still be challenged by EDDC before adoption of the Local Plan?

What would have been the outcome of elections if electors had realised that it was extremely unlikely that the site would actually be withdrawn, with or without additional information, in spite of the strong assurances put out by councillors Hughes and Troman?

Another push-me pull-you situation: Sidford Fields Industrial Estate

So, at the last minute, EDDC pulled the Sidford industrial estate from its local plan. The inspector refused to take it out saying that no alternative site was available in Sidmouth.

Yet does anyone recall that not long ago, the Alexandria estate was being mooted for an Asda with many solutions being mooted for access problems to make it viable. Much more viable than heavy industrial use of the minor Sidford/Sidbury road.

Oh, how the world changes when pound signs appear in people’s eyes!

Sidmouth Herald publishes Diviani’s attempt to explain the unexplainable.

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/inspector_includes_sidford_business_park_in_local_plan_1_4384071

Sidmouth Neighbourhood Plan gets underway with Public Meeting, Tues 19 January, 7pm, St Teresa’s Church Hall

“The new composition of Sidmouth Town Council, resulting from the May 2015 elections, has allowed a Neighbourhood Plan (NP) to get started at long last. A Neighbourhood Plan, as you may know, gives some protection against speculative development.

Save Our Sidmouth hopes that you will show your support for this essential work, by coming along to the Town Council’s information meeting on Tuesday 19th January 2016, 7pm, St Teresa’s Church Hall, Connaught Rd (N.B. not Woolbrook Rd, as originally stated …”

http://saveoursidmouth.com/2016/01/14/sidmouth-neighbourhood-plan-gets-underway-with-public-meeting-tues-19-january-7pm-st-teresas-church-hall/

Sidmouth: a chance for EDDC to get regeneration right for once

Letter published in Sidmouth Herald:

Sir,

The seemingly heavy-handed ‘regeneration’ of nearby coastal towns does not bode well for Sidmouth. The sell-off in Seaton has left it dominated by Tesco, and it appears to me a loose agreement to build affordable homes has been broken since the supermarket giant fell on hard times.

I believe things are not looking good, either, in Exmouth. The plans presented to the public there, for a seafront leisure complex, bear little resemblance to the residential development now proposed. Long-established small businesses have apparently been swept aside.

This week, EDDC’s regeneration team have turned their attention to Sidmouth, with an agreement to do a £10,000 ‘scoping report’ for the eastern end of the town, with the Town Council contributing £2,000. This arrangement suggests who is likely to have the most say.

Fortunately, much of the ‘scoping’ has already been done, voluntarily, by local organisations. In 2006, the Vision Group for Sidmouth presented EDDC with a detailed study on behalf of the town’s “residents, visitors and businesses”. More recently, the Save the Drill Hall campaign produced
architect’s plans of how that building could be transformed.

And right now, in a new and timely initiative, an international architecture competition has been launched, based on what local people want, — and don’t want. The
simple questions in phase 1-public consultation , can be completed at this link:

http://www.easterntownpartnership.com

Find out more at a free public Information drop-in session, this Saturday , 9 Jan, 10-12noon, Leigh Browne Room, Old Meeting Dissenters’ Chapel (opposite High Street post office).

Best of all, the new Sidmouth Town Council are beginning work on a Neighbourhood Plan to establish what the town needs. If EDDC looks and listens, it could get the ‘regeneration’ right for THIS coastal town.

Jackie Green
Sidmouth

Sidmouth architecture competition gets mixed reaction at town council meeting

“At Sidmouth Town Council (STC) tonight, the architecture competition for eastern town was described as “a fantastic opportunity” (Cllr Dawn Manley) , and “a great initiative” (Cllr John Rayson). Chair, Jeff Turner was also supportive, saying he regarded the competition as “part of a mix” of ideas alongside those that would emerge from Sidmouth’s Neighbourhood Plan now being prepared by the Town Council, and from the District’s Local Plan. Cllr David Barratt, too, took an optimistic view. “It’s going to happen, let’s make it positive”, he urged his colleagues, emphasising that “it costs us nothing”, but with the proviso that “it must be open-ended”.

Cllr Ian Barlow found himself a lone voice amongst the councillors. In an untypically rambling speech criticising the competition as “too early”, he was straightaway countered by Cllr Dawn Manley. “It’s never too early”, she said, pointing out that “EDDC say they do want to work with the Town Council and with the public”.

Cllr Kelvin Dent welcomed the “crucial” scoping exercise about to be started by EDDC with STC, but added a note of caution. He asked the Chair, “In view of our contribution (£2,000 from STC, with £8,000 from EDDC), could I request that the Town Council be represented on the scoping exercise committee,” to ensure that we are involved in, for example, the choice of consultants?”

The reply was not entirely reassuring. “I understand we still have to finalise the format for the scoping exercise” , Jeff Turner said.

At this point, the town clerk, Chris Holland, was invited to comment. “It is this council who will be leading the scoping exercise “ he vehemently claimed, adding, “I don’t care what’s happened in Exmouth and in Seaton” and “I don’t care what baggage EDDC brings with it. This is Sidmouth, and we will get it right”.

With this somewhat parochial assurance, the discussion was closed.”

http://saveoursidmouth.com/2016/01/04/architecture-competition-for-eastern-town-part-of-a-mix-of-ideas-says-chair-of-sidmouth-town-council/

Re-imagining Port Royal: drop-in session 9 January 10-12 noon

Reimagining Port Royal

Architecture competition for eastern town and Port Royal

Public information drop-in session, Sat 9 January 10 a.m to 12 noon

Leigh Browne Room at the Old Meeting Dissenters’ Chapel (opposite Tesco)

The consultation can be completed on the spot, e.g. for those who don’t have internet access

Refreshments available
Donations welcome to cover costs
Organised by the Eastern Town Partnership
http://www.easterntownpartnership.com

Scrutiny at its best … excuses at their worst … “corporate relations” (un)explained by Councillor Twiss

Last night’s Scrutiny committee meeting exposed two more examples of EDDC leaders’ instinct to make decisions without proper consultation.

The ubiquitous Cllr Phil Twiss (Conservative, Honiton St Michael’s) who, in addition to all his other roles, is portfolio holder for corporate relations, was summoned to explain why the democratic process had been so blatantly short-circuited by a council press release in September.

Cllr Cathy Gardner (Independent, Sidmouth Town) asked him why she and the other Sidmouth ward councillors had been taken by surprise by an announcement in the Sidmouth Herald that the Council was considering building affordable housing on Mill Street carpark. There had been no consultation with interested parties like the town council, and ward members were sent copies of the press release 14 minutes before it was published!

Cllr Twiss’ replied that he had not been involved with the release, (“It wasn’t me, guv”) but claimed it was a matter of urgency because a journalist had asked for a statement, and the deadline was pressing.

Cllr Marianne Rixson (Independent, Sidmouth Sidford) retorted that this sounded very much like “the journalist tail wagging the council dog” and it was no excuse for not consulting democratically before arbitrarily publishing controversial initiatives.

The Scrutiny Committee agreed and voted to remind Cabinet that there was a Protocol that councillors concerned should be consulted before press releases were authorised. It also welcomed guidance produced by the Communications Officer which made a similar point.

Silence remained about who had authorised the Sidmouth story but Cllr Bill Nash (Conservative Exmouth Town) may have been warm when he said only floods and other emergencies required urgent press releases. All other communications were non-urgent and should not be released if authorised only by “the Leader and senior officers.”

In passing, Cllr Nash also slammed the Council leadership for publishing detailed pictures and maps of developments along Queen’s Drive in Exmouth which were very different from any plans that had been consulted upon.

This was taken up by Scrutiny Chair Cllr Roger Giles (Independent, Ottery St Mary Town) who read a letter from two Exmouth residents complaining about pending planning applications for major works, including diverting Queen’s Drive, part of the latest, much altered, waterfront development scheme.

Exmouth Cllr Brenda Taylor (Lib Dem,Exmouth ) angrily commented that these plans proposed massive residential development which had never been agreed to by councillors. She felt she was “wasting her time” attending meetings when such arbitrary decisions were made in secret.

At this point the Democratic Services Officer and a Legal Officer intervened to argue that the Scrutiny Committee could not discuss the Waterfront Project because planning was outside its remit.

Cllr Rob Longhurst (Independent, Woodbury and Lympstone) wasn’t having any of this. “The reputation of EDDC is nil in Exmouth,” he said, because the current extravagant plans were being “justified” by a few hundred replies to a questionnaire about the different, more modest, “Splash” project.

Cllr Megan Armstrong (Independent, Exmouth Halsdon) agreed. “It’s not about planning, it’s about independent public consultation”, she said. It was about whether the people of Exmouth wanted or needed what the Council leadership was imposing on them.

Cllr Val Ranger (Independent, Newton Poppleford and Harpford) said it was quite within the remit of Scrutiny to look at questions of process, on “whether public consultation is being properly followed.”

The committee voted to do precisely that, once the current legal actions over Exmouth seafront businesses are resolved.

In the meantime, watch out for fireworks over Exmouth seafront at the full Council meeting on Wednesday 16th December.

Independent councillors get creative (and help charity) at Mill Street car park, Sidmouth

” … EDDC chief executive Mark Williams replied that Mill Street car park would not be developed ‘for the foreseeable future’ – before clarifying that he meant ‘the next two or three years’.

Opening Mill Street for a local cause was the brainchild of Sidmouth councillors Cathy Gardner, John Dyson and Matt Booth.

Councillor Iain Chubb, portfolio holder for the environment, said: “Having a car park with unoccupied spaces is of benefit to no-one, so it makes sense to take the opportunity to test public demand for reserved off-street car parking and at the same time use this exercise to help a terrific cause.”

He said the move will ensure the spaces are not wasted while EDDC prepares to implement a pay and display system next year.

Rotary club treasurer Bill Titley welcomed the donations.

He said it will be spent on the volunteers’ various projects supporting elderly and youth groups locally.

The council’s business support team will collect donations and issue permits lasting one, two or three weeks.

Anyone interested in applying for one should call 01395 571780 or email carparks@eastdevon.gov.uk”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/mill_street_cash_to_boost_rotary_club_of_sidmouth_1_4336831

Mill Street car park – EDDC muddies the fudge!

Can anyone work out what the future of Mill Street from this article below? Is it a car park? Is it a development site? And why does EDDC need a ” partner” on this one site?

“East Devon District Council’s (EDDC) cabinet will consider bringing in a commercial partner to run the facility when it meets on Wednesday.

The review comes after more than 50 residents and businesspeople united in support of bringing the spaces, currently for permit holders only, back into wider use. EDDC is considering developing the site for affordable housing.

A report to cabinet says that EDDC could manage a pay and display car park itself, but the process would likely take too long to get it open in time for Christmas. Bringing in an external partner to manage it using number plate recognition technology would save the council £10,000 in legal work, consultation and advertising costs needed to vary its parking regulations. Revenue would be split 50-50 between EDDC and the external contractor – a move intended to avoid ‘incentivising over-zealous enforcement’ that could damage the council’s reputation.

EDDC reviewed the previous system of permits because it found that some spaces were being used by second home owners – while other had changed hands unofficially. The council trebled the annual cost of a permit for Mill Street or Holmdale to £1,800. When it sold only 22 out of a possible 58 permits, it suggested that Mill Street could be developed for affordable housing.

EDDC is still considering developing the site, but says it will continue to offer sufficient reserved car parking spaces at Mill Street and Holmdale to meet the needs of its existing customers.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/partner_for_mill_street_1_4326479

Hard luck if you want to enter or leave Sidmouth and Seaton car parks more than once after 9 pm

Whilst it is commendable that EDDC should wish to discourage boy racers in two car parks, one each in Sidmouth and Seaton or does beg the question – how do you get your car into or out of said car parks when the barriers are down between 9 pm and 8 am? Or are all Sidmothians and Seatonians safely in their beds by 9 pm and never going to work before 8 am? And what of those who have annual permits – will they get a discount because these car parks are no longer available for multiple use for half the day? “Dragon’s teeth” may well let you only in or only out but surely there must be times when they will not be appropriate for the ordinary car user who may, for all sorts of reasons need multiple exits and entry at times? And surely overtime is going to need to be paid to those who do the locking/unlocking? Hmmm.

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/news/2015/11/boy-racers-to-be-deterred-from-using-seaton-and-sidmouth-public-car-parks/

Pegasus Sidmouth: Milton Keynes without the roundabouts

Pegasus Life, the company buying the Knowle from EDDC, has just held a glossy public exhibition in Sidmouth to unveil their plans to build 126 retirement apartments on the site of the council offices, car parks and part of the gardens (presumably the other large block to the right of the first picture is built on the current car park?):

Pegasus2

Pegasus1

The relocation of the council HQ is highly controversial as it will cost the town four hundred jobs which the Council proposes to compensate for by building a business park in the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty at Sidford.

The gardens and parkland around the council offices are one of jewels in Sidmouth’s crown. Pegasus Life claim to have “looked at the local buildings, landscape and ecology when taking inspiration for our design”, but many visitors were unimpressed. One commented that “Milton Keynes is coming to Sidmouth!”

In the current design most of the planned apartments will be in five big brutalist blocks on the plateau which dominates the southern part of the public gardens. They encroach onto the upper lawns and, four stories high with flat roofs topped with lift machinery, they will loom over the gardens.

Some East Devon watchers will remember that that these lawns were surreptitiously removed from the public gardens in 2012 by officers and slipped into the area to be sold to developers. None of Sidmouth’s Tory councillors seemed to noticed this sleight of hand at the time which could help to explain why most of them are no longer there.

Press release on Mill Street Car Park future to be published on 10 December 2015

How do we know?

Click to access 171115-overview-agenda-combined.pdf

Page 60 (last page)

Thursday: too late for that week’s local papers.
What is stopping the press release being published before that date Owl wonders.

Picking and choosing – EDDC doesn’t partner with Exeter to tackle homelessness, Teignbridge does

Also in the latest Express and Echo, it is revealed that Exeter has the highest level of homelessness outside London.

Exeter and Teignbridge have announced that they will work together to tackle it.

Silence from East Devon – where two homeless men have died on the streets of Sidmouth in the last few months – one in a freezing bus shelter and one in a church porch (where the church is trying desperately to do its bit to help people).

Are the homeless invisible to our council?

East Devon coastal sprawl could cost you a 27% drop in your house price if World Heritage status risked

” … the Jurassic Coast World Heritage Site is formed from a massive slice of East Devon and Dorset.

This includes towns already well known to attract premium price tags such as Beer, Lyme Regis, Seaton and Sidmouth and Budleigh Salterton, which earlier this year was named among the most expensive places to buy in the Westcountry with average prices of £342,442.

According to Zoopla, while the average residential property is valued at £284,000, those near a site that holds Unesco status are valued at £362,000 – a difference of 27%.”

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/World-heritage-status-means-West-homes-attract-78/story-28184478-detail/story.html

“Brave Hugo”?

From today’s Sidmouth Herald Opinion page:

‘Regarding last week’s front page story about our MP Hugo Swire’s ‘big vision’ for Sidmouth sea front.

It should be noted that Sidmouth has successfully resisted all such overwrought ideas for 200 years. It is this above all else that gives the town such a unique character. It’s unmolested and historic frontage with the sea is not only its greatest attraction and income generator; it is why tourists, visitors, writers, artists, home-buyers come again and again.

It is hard to believe that Hugo (or anyone) truly believes that a multi-story car park and a marina must adorn the nation’s best preserved Regency sea front – and effectively ruin its character (see the East Devon Watch website for possible examples). Will our Westminster representative be remembered as the one to place the first carbuncle?

Is he immune to the messages of Sir John Betjeman, Jane Austen, Elizabeth Barrett Browning who all treasured the town’s character and spoke out against such cultural short-sitedness?

This is not a ‘brave’ vision Hugo, it is a tragic one.

Peter Nasmyth

(author of ‘Literature and Landscape in East Devon.’)’

Will remaining Sidmouth park land be worth even the £1 EDDC wants to sell it for?

http://saveoursidmouth.com/2015/11/06/no-rights-of-way-into-the-public-park-at-knowle-letter-to-the-press-contains-a-warning/

Mrs Liverton throwing stones in a greenhouse…..

From a Sidmouth correspondent:

“How ironical that a letter in last week’s Simouth Herald from Mrs Ann Liverton, former EDDC Tory councillor, should accuse independent councillors of East Devon Alliance (EDA) of not supporting local farming. (30 October, Opinion, “Must do better”).

She seems unaware that a key motive for the creation of EDA in 2012 was to try to protect what was left of the District’s prime farmland from being concreted over in the frenzy of destructive development that was assailing it.

In 2008 it was Mrs Liverton’s Conservative group on East Devon District Council that voted to relax planning rules to make it easier for agricultural land in rural areas to be converted into “business parks” often housing noisy and polluting industrial activities.

In 2009 she was a member of the planning (“Development Management”) committee that gave the green light for the massive –and continuing- expansion of Hill Barton and Greendale Barton business parks.

Many residents of Woodbury Salterton in Raleigh Ward were brought close to despair by the consequent loss of farmland and the destruction of their quiet rural environment.

And, final irony, the EDDC councillor representing this ward at the time was Ann Liverton!”