Who will fund the Sidford Industrial Park post-Brexit?

Property funds that own offices, shops, industrial units and warehouses are freezing their assets as fundholders seek to remove their investments in them. In a recession, such properties are millstones, as they go quickly into negative equity and are hard to shift unless you do so at a loss.

Businesses contracting and cautious entrepreneurs no longer want accommodation and this leads to a glut of empty properties which exacerbates the problem.

In this climate, who would fund Sidford Fields and why?

Hold your breath in Sidford, the HGVs are coming

Imagine the increase in particulate discharge, particularly its effect on the health of the children of the village.and the integrity of the structure of those beautiful old houses on the route, most built with shallow foundations. And in a flood-prone area of an AONB. Wouldn’t happen in the Blackdown Hills!

“Campaigners have branded Sidford and Sidbury’s ‘bottleneck’ roads ‘too narrow’ to handle the increased transit of lorries.

Councillor Marianne Rixson said traffic is predicted to increase by a third along ‘pinch point’ roads if plans for a business park in Sidford go ahead.

She said the roads are already congested – particularly School Street, near Sidbury Mill and through Sidbury – and branded claims that the site ‘is well served by highway access’ as misleading.

Cllr Rixson, who represents the Sidmouth-Sidford ward on East Devon District Council, said: “The roads are too narrow yet they are predicting a 32 per cent increase in traffic through School Street if the development is approved – Sidbury, too, has various ‘pinch points’ where two vehicles cannot pass.” She added that there needed to be a ‘duty of care’ to pedestrians on roads where there are no pavements.

And with HGVs nearly three metres wide, Cllr Rixson fears two lorries could not pass each other in School Street – which is just 4.8 metres wide.

She said: “The A375 is an upgraded B road and is essentially still a B road. Already lorries drive on the pavement in School Street and, in Sidbury, there are stretches where there are no pavements at all.”

Devon County Council’s highways team is being consulted on the application and said it is considering its response.”

http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/in-the-press/20160702/sidmouth-herald-hgv-increase-issue-on-narrow-roads/

Exeter City Council protects its centre from out-of-town development

And the Secretary of State rules in their favour:

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/minister-throws-out-big-edge-of-city-shopping-centre-plan-for-exeter/story-29465764-detail/story.html

Meanwhile, in Sidmouth …

Sidmouth: local architecture competition short list designs on display

Short listed designs can be seen here:
http://futuresforumvgs.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/plans-for-port-royal-and-eastern-town_29.html

‘Blue-sky thinking’ in Sidmouth architecture competition

“An open-air theatre, a pier venue and a marina are among the five final designs in a competition to re-imagine Sidmouth’s eastern town.

Ideas came in from around the world – from Japan to Peru and Brazil – with entrants letting their imaginations run riot to redefine the Regency resort.

A jury has whittled some 18 designs down to a shortlist of five – and now Sidmouth citizens can vote for their favourite.

The competition was dreamed up by Sidmouth-born architect Henry Beech Mole, who said: “The shortlisted entries represent a good variety of possible futures for Sidmouth – a pier, a marina, landscapes, ecological strategies, and new public spaces – any of which would be great additions to the town. We would now hope that, with local support, we can move towards trying to implement the winning scheme. This is an unusual chance for the town to think about what it wants to be in the 21st century.

“I hope that through the competition we can move away from the binary arguments of tradition and progression and take an holistic view of how the town can retain its charm and beauty while also evolving to become a more vibrant and successful place for the future.”

For now, these are just ideas – their implementation will be down to the landowners. The detailed designs will be exhibited until Tuesday, July 12, at Kennaway House, where residents can vote for their favourite.

They can also be seen online at sidmouthherald.co.uk

The winning entry will be revealed on July 13.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/blue_sky_thinking_in_sidmouth_architecture_competition_1_4598727

Sidford: Environment Agency “not using new flooding figures to save developer money”

The Sid Vale Association is to take legal advice on the Environment Agency’s “incomprehensible” decision to support a planning application for a business park on a Sidford floodplain.

Here’s an extract from the Sidmouth Herald’s report :

” … The Environment Agency (EA) has defended its ‘incomprehensible’ support of plans for a 9.3-acre business park in Sidford – because using its new flood risk figures could cost the developer money.

A climate change report by the government body states that the region’s peak river flow is expected to increase by 85 per cent – four times more than anticipated – while surface water is likely to increase 40 per cent by around 2070, which is double the previous forecast.

In light of the increased risk to the flood-prone valley, representatives are calling for the agency to rethink its support of an outline planning application for the business park between Sidford and Sidbury, submitted by Fords of Sidmouth.

But the EA states it has not taken the new figures published earlier this year into account because the site is already allocated in the adopted East Devon Local Plan – a development blueprint to cover the next 15 years.

The EA’s policy states: “The advice will come into immediate effect. However, where local plans or development proposals and associated flood risk assessments are well advanced, the application of the updated allowances could significantly slow down completion or add to costs.”

An EA spokesman said: “We considered the plan and application to be well advanced and therefore reasonable to base advice on the existing allowances.”

The Sid Vale Association (SVA) has threatened legal action if the agency does not review its ‘short-sighted and potentially dangerous’ position on the matter.

SVA conservation and planning committee chair Richard Thurlow said: “Our letter [to the EA] reflects the comments of many Sidmouth and Sidford residents. We find it absolutely incomprehensible that the Environment Agency is not using its own regulations which came into operation in February. … “

Increased flood risk: SVA calls for Environment Agency rethink on the Sidford planning application.

Sidford Business Park: evidence and information for objectors

Sidford-Sidbury Rd, next to Sidford Fields site for proposed business park.

Sidford-Sidbury Rd, next to Sidford Fields site for proposed business park.

imageimage

More details here:
Save Our Sidford—- Where to write

Sidmouth doesn’t like EDDC’s new ideas on street trading

East Devon District Council (EDDC) is proposing to designate the whole district as a ‘consent street’ – overturning the wide-spread prohibition.

It says the new approach would improve flexibility and pave the way for farmers’ markets or Christmas events, but town councillors are reluctant to hand over control.

Representing Sidmouth Chamber of Commerce, Richard Eley told Monday’s tourism and economy committee meeting: “Our concern is this is opening the door for a free-for-all for all kinds of stalls and vans in the streets of Sidmouth.

“We think too much power is being handed over. There’s also a distinct possibility of unfair competition – they won’t be paying rent or rates.”

He said if the rules had been relaxed last year, EDDC would have found it difficult to resist proposals for a coffee van on Sidmouth beach.

Councillor Ian Barlow added: “We shouldn’t be scared of it if we have control, but if we have no control, we should be very worried.”

But district councillor Frances Newth defended the proposals, saying: “Each application will be considered on its own merits. I don’t see it as a free-for-all, but as prevention of a free-for-all.”

The full council will consider the proposals on July 4.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/relaxing_street_trading_rules_fears_of_a_free_for_all_in_sidmouth_1_4582237

Sidford business park … a tangle of conflicts

The Sir John Cave-owned site, east of the A375, is currently undeveloped agricultural land and part of an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), but Fords’ application says there were no ‘realistic alternatives’ close to Sidmouth.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/damning_response_to_sidford_business_park_plans_1_4582231

Vice Lord-Lieutenant – Sir John Cave Bt DL……..lives in East Devon near Sidmouth, educated at Eton and RAC Cirencester. A farmer and landowner managing an agricultural estate comprising in hand arable farm, let farms, commercial and amenity woodland and residential property. In the past has been the Chairman of Council of Devon County Agricultural Association and was President in 2009, a Governor of Bicton College and RASE Council Member for Devon.

Past Chairman & President CLA Devon Branch and nationally sat on both Agriculture & Land Use and Policy Committees, past Chairman of the South West Regional committee. Previously a Trustee of FACE and is a Director of Mole Avon Trading Ltd. Sir John holds public appointment as a member of Agricultural Land & Drainage Tribunal, is a Vice-President Devon YFC, President Devon Association of Local Councils. He was High Sheriff of Devon in 2005.”

People

Sir John was former landlord of East Devon MP Hugo Swire when he lived in East Devon, though now Mr Swire chooses to maintain his second home in Mid-Devon.

The Agricultural and Land Drainage Tribunal

What cases you can take to the tribunal
You can apply to the tribunal if you want to:

take over a tenancy when a close relative retires or dies
get consent for a notice to quit served on a tenant
ask a neighbour to clear ditches or carry out drainage work on their land
You can also apply for the tribunal to:

issue a certificate of bad husbandry if the tenant isn’t farming the land properly
order the landlord to provide or repair fixed equipment

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/agricultural-land-and-drainage-disputes-apply-to-a-tribunal

“MPs criticise government over flood protection plans”

Of interest to those in Sidford, who are being let down by flood protection by inappropriate development.

… “Labour MP Ms Creagh said: “We know that flooding is projected to get worse and occur more frequently because of climate change, so it just isn’t good enough for government to react to flooding events as they occur.

“Communities at risk deserve certainty from government.”
The committee found that funding for flooding fluctuates year-on-year. Funding was initially cut during the last parliament and only increased after the winter floods of 2013-14.

The government has committed to spending £2.3bn on building new defences and to protect spending on maintaining existing defences – but the EAC warned they were “sceptical” the government would reach its target of protecting 300,000 properties, saying it was based on an optimistic forecast that assumed the greatest efficiency in spending decisions.
The committee also said it was surprised to learn the extra £700m funding for flood defences announced in this year’s Budget was based on a “political calculation” and may not be allocated with the same strict economic criteria as the £2.3bn.

The report said that could lead to inefficiencies in flood investments, poor decision-making and outcomes that were potentially unfair to some regions. …

… The condition of critical flood defences is in decline, according to the committee.

Ms Creagh said: “The government needs to put money into the upkeep of existing flood defences as well as investing in new defences. Failure to do so can have terrible consequences for residents and businesses when defences fail.

“Any decline in the condition of critical flood defences represents an unacceptable risk to local communities in flood prone areas. We urge the government to go beyond its current target and aim to have virtually all its critical assets meeting the Environment Agency’s required condition by 2019.”

The committee said it was concerned the government does not know how prepared local authorities are for flooding, with Ms Creagh adding that local authorities “are not receiving the support they need to prepare for, and mitigate, the impacts of flooding”.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36480213

Sidmouth Neighbourhood Plan consultations

Throughout June and July in various locations, details here:

https://www.visionforsidmouth.org/calendar/2016/june/sidmouth-neighbourhood-plan-hits-the-road.aspx

Sidford: controversy gets an airing on BBC Radio Devon

Sidford Employment site result of “heroic calculation” on a “speculative basis” , SOS Chair tells Radio Devon

BBC’s Simon Bates’ interview with Richard Thurlow last Friday (3rd June), can be heard on the Radio Devon website. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03vh95v

Go to Simon Bates o3/o6/2016, from 00.45-01.02, and 49.50 to 57.14.

The interview was followed up by a phone-in from Independent East Devon Alliance (IEDA) Cllr Marianne Rixson, EDDC Ward Member for Sidmouth-Sidford since May 2015. You can listen to what she said, from 01.41.05 to 01.47.25 in the recording.

Simon Bates suggests he wants to pursue the Sidford business park planning application issues, on his breakfast show later on.

And don’t forget there are just a few days’ left to comment to EDDC DEADLINE is 8th June:

See https://saveoursidmouth.com/2016/05/26/urgent-sidford-business-park-planning-application-now-in-the-more-people-who-write-in-the-better-deadline-for-comments-weds-8th-june/

Sidford Employment site result of “heroic calculation” on a “speculative basis” , SOS Chair tells Radio Devon

Radio Devon to air Sidmouth Business Park issue tomorrow approx 7.20 am

Radio Devon breakfast show interview tomorrow with SOS Chair, about Planning Application for Sidford business park.

Richard Thurlow will be interviewed by Radio Devon’s Simon Bates, at 7.20 a.m. on Friday 3rd June. To phone in comments, tel. 0345 301 1034

Here’s a reminder of some of the issues:

URGENT! Sidford Business Park Planning Application now in. “The more people who write in, the better”. DEADLINE for comments, WEDS 8th JUNE.

Sidmouth Town Council discuss PegasusLife tonight

Papers here:

Click to access PL._AGENDA_1.6.16.pdf

Meeting at St Theresa’s Hall, 6.30 pm.

Knowle plans on the agenda at Sidmouth Town Council Meeting this Wednesday (1st June, 6.30pm, St. Teresa’s Hall)

Sidford Industrial Estate Planning Considerations

“Dear Residents

Planning ref:​16/0669/MOUT

I hope these notes will help you to make comments about the above planning application. The more people who write in, the better. Please send your observations and ask your friends to do likewise to:

​planning@eastdevon.gov.uk or
​Write to Planning Dept, EDDC, Knowle, Sidmouth, EX10 8HL

Please remember the following:

​Closing date: 8th June 2016
​Quote ref:​16/0669/MOUT

Note you can ONLY make comments relating to ‘planning considerations’. These, for example, include matters such as:

​The impact of a proposal on your property;
​The proposed design and materials;
​Issues relating to vehicular access and parking;
​Impact on trees;
​Noise issues,
​Concerns about flooding.

Matters which are not classed as ‘planning considerations’ include:

​Loss of value to your property; Loss of a view; Boundary and neighbour disputes, or ​The impact of a proposal on private drainage systems.

Planning policies which relate to this development can be found at:

east devon.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy/local-plan-2013-2031/
(Click on The Local Plan 2013-2031 to access this document)

Strategy 46 p.144
Landscape Conservation and Enhancement and AONBs:

‘Development will only be permitted where it:
1. Conserves and enhances the landscape character of the area;
2. Does not undermine landscape quality; and
3. Is appropriate to the economic, social and well being of the area’

Non-compliance with the NPPF
The National Planning Policy Framework puts an emphasis on protecting AONB land, such as at Sidford. Para 116 of the NPPF states that planning permission should be refused for major developments on AONB land except in exceptional circumstances and where it can be demonstrated that the development is in the public interest.

Comments could include the fact that this is a tourist area, plus unemployment is low and the proposed development would require in-commuting to fill any jobs created.

ENVIRONMENT p.182

EN13 – development on high quality agricultural land
Development proposes warehousing which could be a 24/7 operation – noise, lighting, impact of pollution from artificial light on local amenity

EN14 – control of pollution – to residents or the wider environment
Pollution of the atmosphere – School St and pinch points in Sidbury – stationery traffic (especially as volumes will increase)
Noise and/or vibration
Light intrusion
Pollution of sites of wildlife value, especially European designated sites or species (eg otters and horseshoe bats)

EN21 – river and coastal flooding
‘Flood risk assessment demonstrates that the development will be safe, without increasing flood risk elsewhere and, where possible, will reduce flood risk overall.’
NB any increased flood risk would impact Sidbury, Sidford and Sidmouth – remember there were four flood warnings from The Environment Agency in 2012.

EMPLOYMENT p.199

E9 – town centre vitality and shopping areas – THIS NEEDS TO BE PROTECTED
NB. ‘Ancillary retail’ is part of Fords application
Planning application uses include B1 (office), B2 (general), B8 (distribution / warehousing)
…will be permitted provided:
1. ‘Use would not undermine the shopping character, visual amenity, vitality or viability of town centre
4. Amenity interest of occupiers of adjoining properties is not adversely affected by reason of noise, smell or litter
5. Would not cause traffic problems !!! (NB. Lorries already drive on the pavement in School St because they cannot pass oncoming traffic and there are traffic tailbacks during the tourism season)’

TRAFFIC p.221

TC3 – traffic management schemes
,,,’when considering development proposals in town centre, will seek the introduction of traffic management schemes when one or more of the following objectives can be achieved:
1. Safe and efficient movement of mobility impaired, pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles
6. Alleviation of congestion (see E9, 3. And EN14/pollution above)
7. Reduction of traffic conflict and accident potential
8. Reduction of delays to public transport
9. Reduction of environmental damage by traffic’

Please could you also write or email local papers:

Sidmouth Herald:​​stefan.gordon@archant.co.uk
Pulman’s (View from):​​pemedia@pemedia.co.uk​​
Express & Echo:​​letters@expressandecho.co.uk
Western Morning News:​wmn@westernmorningnews.co.uk

Yours sincerely

Kim Scratchley
Two Bridges Road, Sidford”

Sidbury Business Park plans – a test of sustainability

Possibly the most unsustainable development plans ever mooted for Sidford/Sidbury – and some very half hearted excuses about why it cannot be in Sidmouth (where, oddly, it was thought possible when Asda were interested).

“… Despite an eleventh-hour bid to remove it, the Sid Valley was allocated 12 acres of employment land north of the A3052.

Fords has its sights set on some 14 acres of agricultural land east of the A375, but the proposed ‘net development’ area is 9.3 acres. Its application argues that having no development of an employment site in Sidmouth over the Local Plan period is an ‘unacceptable conclusion’.

The company claims that developments that provide new employment opportunities are ‘well overdue’ in the area, as the disparity between wages and the cost of living is widening, particularly for young people.

According to the plans, the greenfield site is the ‘only available and deliverable’ option close to the urban edge of Sidmouth and there were no ‘realistic alternatives’.

This is despite the ‘adverse and direct, long-term effect of severe significance’ on the landscape character, according to the application. The impact will be mitigated by the planting of 3.7 acres of woodland, 400 metres of hedgerow and a ‘substantial buffer’ of trees around much of the site, say the plans.

The application states that the town centre cannot meet the demand because of the lack of parking and disabled access.

It also says it is unviable to create a new £1million access so the Alexandria Industrial Estate – home to Fords’ current HQ – can reach capacity as an employment site. The estate has been allocated Sidmouth’s remaining 1.2 acres of employment land in the Local Plan.

Fords’ application allocates 9,120 sqm for business use, 6,840 sqm for ‘general industrial’ use and 6,840 sqm for storage and distribution – a total area equivalent to three football pitches. …”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/business_park_plans_for_sidmouth_revealed_1_4533344

Let’s see where Councillor Stuart Hughes stands on this, having done the hokey-kokey so far.

“Britain’s seaside towns bouncing back”

But not because of high rise second homes or high-priced plastic entertainment – because of nostalgia for old-fashioned things such as piers and donkey rides mixed with modern attractions such as art galleries. THEY get Tracey Emin and Watne Hemmingway in to meld old and new – we get Moirai Capital Investments [very] Limited.

Typical EDDC – let the developers give them what they want rather than giving us what we want.

“Perhaps we have also arrived at a greater appreciation of the pleasures of the classic British break. A blend of familiarity, simplicity and beauty makes our coastal resorts comforting and exciting. The Proustian rush of candyfloss and donkey dung, yes, but also the thrill of experiencing towns reinventing themselves for the 21st century. Margate’s 1920s Dreamland amusement park, given a retro makeover by the Red Or Dead designer Wayne Hemingway, is one example – the schlock of the old meets the shock of the new. Think, too, of Banksy’s Dismaland in Weston-super-Mare, and Butlins marking its 80th anniversary by remodelling their Minehead family chalets in consultation with users of Mumsnet. Shakespeare would have a phrase for all this: once more on to the beach.”

http://gu.com/p/4j65n?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Rush to avoid Community Infrastructure Levy?

According to Official Notices in the press, Community Infrastructure Levy will become payable to EDDC from 1 September 2016. This is charged per square metre and is in bands with Cranbrook being lowest and Sidmouth being highest.

Should we expect a rush to get planning permissions past the Development Management Committee before 31 August? Would this explain why Bovis is rushing through its application for phase 2 of its Seaton development where it wants zero affordable housing? Will we see the Pegasuslife Knowle application done and dusted before the end of August too?

Stuart Hughes – lonely pothole filler of Sidmouth

“Sidmouth’s first ‘road warden’, Councillor Stuart Hughes, has been singing the praises of the scheme, which has, so far, not received the support of people in the town. …

… number of people have taken to the Herald’s Facebook to voice their views on the matter – with one person questioning what they paid their council tax for.

Others also expressed similar objections, asking why residents were being expected to pick up the slack. Another suggested residents ‘on the dole’ should ‘fill a hole’.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/sidmouth_residents_encouraged_to_fix_pot_holes_1_4504507

Knowle: EDDC helping Pegasus to get its ducks in a row

“An EDDC spokeswoman said: “We have received an application from Pegasus, but we will require some additional information before we can validate it. Once we have everything that we need, the application will be advertised, posted on our website and the community consulted in the usual way.”

The developer said ‘major changes’ had been made to its original vision ahead of the plans being submitted. Under the plans, the site’s 19th century former hotel and 1970s offices will be demolished to make way for dwellings for over-60s. The Caretaker’s Cottage will remain. Much of the parkland will remain in public ownership. A restaurant and gym facilities also feature in proposals.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/delay_to_plan_for_115_homes_gym_and_restaurant_at_knowle_sidmouth_1_4503444