East Devon Alliance fields Brixington by-election candidate

… who makes his views known in a letter to the Exmouth Journal:

“Messrs O’Day and Huett, correspondents in your September 1 issue, summed up perfectly the continuing and absolute disregard shown by East Devon District Council (EDDC) towards Exmouth residents.

What is it that EDDC does not understand about the frustration and anger which is brought about by its plans? Why has there been no action following the town poll to request proper consultation on these plans?

Any commercial organisation acting in what I consider such an arrogant and dismissive manner towards its customers would soon be out of business.

EDDC is acting as if it has an absolute right to do with taxpayers’ money and assets as it sees fit.

The officers appear to be running a monopoly, with no competition for the services provided and no fear of losing their extremely well paid jobs.

The ruling group of Conservative councillors have been in place for a long time and seem to have consequently developed a sense of entitlement.

They act as if the money they spend, eg on their proposed seafront development, is theirs alone. It is our money and, as such, we must be involved in how it is spent.

There is a solution though, as shown by Mr Lowder in your September 1 issue.

Local democracy means turning out to vote in the Brixington by-election on October 6 and, if you disagree with how the ruling party is behaving, then vote for change.

Robin Humphreys
Prospective East Devon Alliance candidate
Trelivan Close, Exmouth”

http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/robin-humphreys/20160909/exmouth-journal-perhaps-time-vote-change/

Co-operative Party to split from Labour?

“The Co-operative party aims to develop some “distinctive and independent” policy stances separate from those of Labour, its chairman has said before the party’s annual conference.

The political movement, whose strapline is “politics for people”, has been allied to Labour since 1927, and 25 MPs currently sit in parliament on a joint ticket.

The party recently rejected speculation that it could be a vehicle for Labour MPs who oppose Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership to split away and form their own movement. It is staying neutral in the Labour leadership contest.

Gareth Thomas, the MP for Harrow West and Co-operative chair, said the party would be making more of an effort ahead of its 100-year anniversary in 2017 to develop a voice more of its own.

“We want to be more distinctive,” he said. “We are very clear we want to stay in the [European] single market. We see it as an exercise in international cooperation. And we are pretty pro-business as a party. It is co-op businesses that set us up and which continue to affiliate to us, and it is one of the things that marks us out. We have very good links into the co-operative business community as well.”

The party is launching a policy pamphlet arguing for care recipients, their families and carers to be represented on the boards of private companies providing social care services.

It is also calling for carers working for private social care providers, many of whom are very low paid, to have a right to take over their company – a “right to own” – if it is at risk of closure or is changing hands.

The party said the measures were being put forward to tackle the twin crises in adult social care in England: concerns about poor quality care, and endemic low pay and poor terms and conditions for the workforce.”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/sep/09/co-operative-party-policies-distinct-labour-100-anniversary

Franksy strikes again!

image

And adds the following comment:

“Visual comment on the plans for the watersports centre. If it is built on the same side of the road as the lifeboat station, with the new road running behind it, then present users of the seafront carpark will be pushed further back to the recently closed Arnold Palmer putting course. That means a longer trek to the beach carrying everything. If EDDC have their way, they plan to invite a huge number of extra visitors to the area, which will mean more people, more cars overall and possible congestion on the road into Exmouth.

Many years ago, a teacher from Exmouth Community College asked if a youth club could be set up in “La Cuisine”- the old cafe at the open air swimming pool. This idea was repeatedly quashed as it would bring “boy racers’ and gangs of youngsters to the sea front and the residents would not like it. How ironic that the same council are now welcoming a huge development which will have massive implications for the appearance and use of the seafront with alcohol, litter, noise, coming and going as they seek to develop the “Nightime economy.”

Beware residents- you have seen nothing yet ! Franksy”

No more out-of-hours GP service for Exmouth

Interesting because Exmouth at around 35,000 population is substantially bigger than Honiton, with its 12,000 population.

“Devon Doctors, which runs the out-of-hours GP services in the region, is planning to combine the scheme with Devon’s NHS 111 service, which it will take over next month.

Under the plans due to take effect on October 1, treatment centres such as the one at Exmouth Hospital will close in favour of patients phoning the 111 service for help.

Currently, there is one GP who provides out-of-hours care on weekday evenings and two at the weekends.

This change means there will be no GP working in Exmouth and patients may face having to travel to Exeter or Honiton for treatment.”

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/exmouth_set_to_lose_out_of_hours_gp_1_4689459

North-East devolution called off by Javid

“Devolution for the north-east of England is “off the table”, communities secretary Sajid Javid has said.

Plans for the area’s first directly elected mayor have been scrapped and the relevant legislation withdrawn.

On Tuesday four of the seven North East Combined Authority councils decided to halt plans amid fears over post-Brexit funding from the government.

Mr Javid was “very disappointed” they had voted against the “ambitious and far-reaching devolution deal”, he said.

Sunderland, Durham, Gateshead and South Tyneside councils said they were not satisfied with reassurances over funding following the UK’s decision to leave the European Union.

Newcastle, North Tyneside and Northumberland councils said they remained committed to the plan.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-37312978

“Counties and districts demand funding top up when business rates fall short”

East Devon will, of course be losing ALL the business rates raised by the East Devon Growth Point which will go directly to our Local Enterprise Partnership. We haven’t heard our council complaining- quite the opposite.

“County and district councils have called on the government to commit to providing additional funding for local services where demand outstrips business rate growth following the forthcoming localisation of the levy.

In a joint statement of shared principles on the government’s business rate retention proposals, the County Councils Network, District Councils’ Network and Rural Services Network warned services could be hit without funding guarantees.

The government plans to devolve business rates to authorities by 2019-20. A funding baseline is likely to be set for town halls using local business rates as well as either a top up or tariff payment to reflect a new assessment of local need. Authorities will then retain all local growth – up from the 50% share currently allotted to the sector – and will be financially self-sufficient. Together with other locally raised revenue, mainly council tax, business rates growth will be used to provide council services.

However, the groups said today that the system would need to be monitored to ensure funding matches local demand over time.

“If core statutory demand-led service pressures, such as social care, are set to outstrip resources over time, central government should work with local government to agree additional funding sources,” the document stated.

“Local and central government should consider and agree a way of managing additional risks to local authorities of full retention and find a way of compensating against sharp changes in income or need.”

The groups also called for all areas to have the ability to both lower and raise the rates multiplier. Under the current proposals, authorities will only be able to cut the levy, although city region combined authorities will be able to increase the rate to pay for specific infrastructure projects.

A consultation on the basis for the devolved system is open until 26 September. Views are also being sought on areas where local authorities could take on the funding of services in order to make the plan initially fiscally neutral. Areas suggested by government include public health, early years, youth justice and the attendance allowance paid to help meet care costs.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/09/counties-and-districts-demand-funding-top-when-business-rates-fall-short

EDDC’s Section 106 records appear to be a shambles:

Does EDDC know how much S106 money it has and how much is owed?

Could this happen here?

“Reading Borough Council officer has been jailed over a £42,000 fraud involving money raised from developers through section 106 planning gain contributions.

The council said that a review of its Section 106 system in April had uncovered an anomaly that on further investigation proved to involve fraud.
Peter Owusu-Ansah pleaded guilty on 1 August at Reading Crown Court to one charge under section 4 of the Fraud Act, and has now been sentenced to two years’ imprisonment.

A council statement said the review found no other problems but a detailed audit had been undertaken and recommendations were made to improve processes.

Mr Owusu-Ansah’s fraud involved £42,425.84 and the council will use the Proceeds of Crime Act to try to recover money from him.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=28295%3Aofficer-jailed-for-section-106-planning-gain-fraud&catid=63&Itemid=31

Bovis Homes Victims Group Facebook page

As featured on today’s Spotlight lunchtime news:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/BovisVictimsGroup/

including a number of homebuyers in Devon.

Closed group – membership by request.

Why has EDDC done a special press release for a private venue?

Even under the guise of “Heritage Week” why has EDDC put out this council press release for a privately owned and run venue?

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/news/2016/09/heritage-day-sees-historic-home-open-to-the-public-for-the-first-time/

Does EDDC own the building? It appears not. Why did they choose it to put on some ” outdoor activities” for children there when they have coastal towns and wetlands available?

Councillor Ian Chubb says:

“Our heritage and planning staff worked closely with Rockbeare Manor to deliver a refurbishment of the highest quality, advising on local apple varieties for the new orchard, for example. Our Growth Point and Countryside teams have partnered with the new owner to run this event, because the historic manor and landscaped parkland is such an important asset to the growing East Devon community.”

Were the heritage and planning staff paid for this consultancy advice? If it was free is it available to owners of other private properties in East Devon? If it was paid for – can other people access these busy EDDC employees for a fee?

EDDC now has a good number of current and former members of the hospitality industry as serving councillors, at least three of whom are currently on the EDDC Licensing Committee.

They must be careful who they sup with.

Sidford business park: AONB carbuncle

Last night’s meeting of Sidmouth Town Council Planning Committee unanimously recommended refusal of Fords’ revised application to build a business park on the AONB in Sidford, and condemned it as a “cosmetic attempt” to disguise a “carbuncle” which was totally unacceptable to the people of the Sid Valley.

St Peter’s Hall was crowded with members of the public, and many were scathing in their comments on the applicant’s determination to build a development that the inadequate local road system could not cope with.

The recent report from Devon County Highways Officer which found the application acceptable,was met with incredulity. “Not worth the paper it was written on” said one resident because it totally failed to address the traffic bottle-neck in School Street. Another challenged the objectivity of the Traffic Assessment carried out by the applicant’s consultants, and demanded an independent report.

Councillors vied with each other to condemn the applicant’s, “gross error of judgement” in proposing excessively large buildings up to 15 metres high. Chair Cllr Ian Barlow said they would be higher than other buildings in the Valley with the exception of Sidford parish church, and were more appropriate for a distribution centre rather than small units suitable for local businesses. According to Cllr Kelvin Dent it was the “wrong development in the wrong place”.

EDDC Councillor Marianne Rixson claimed revised information about the distribution of bats as misleading, pointing out that, horseshoe bats had been recorded more widely on the site than the applicant’s survey suggested.

Landowner Sir John Cave was criticised for withdrawing his offer of land for a cycle track to be funded by Devon County, so that Fords could then offer to include it in the development as a crude “inducement” for the application to be approved.

While repeating their united opposition to the proposed development, town councillors felt it necessary to recommend strong conditions to be applied if EDDC were to approve the application. They proposed a maximum ridge height of 7 metres, and a maximum area of 100 square metres for any building; there should be no flat roofs; no retail should be allowed. The cycle track should be completed first, and strict precautions should be taken to mitigate noise and light pollution.

Finally several councillors urged residents to mobilise to “defend their homes”, and a meeting of residents is planned on

Monday 12 September at 7.15 p.m.

in Sidford Social Hall, Byes Lane. Doors open at 6.30pm.

FORDS’ BUSINESS PARK PLAN SLATED BY SIDMOUTH TOWN COUNCIL AND PUBLIC.

Government now planning for 20-30% more extreme rainfall

“The UK’s new flood defence plans anticipate significantly higher extreme rainfall, after new research was published as part of the government’s National Flood Resilience review.

The government, which had been criticised for not taking full account of the impact of climate change in driving up flood risk, will now plan for 20-30% more extreme downpours than before.

The review, prompted by severe flooding in recent winters, also found that critical infrastructure, such as water and telecoms, are at serious risk from floods and utility companies have committed to increasing protection. The government’s official climate change advisers recently warned that flooding could cause a cascade of emergencies by knocking out energy, transport, water and communications link.

The review allocates £12.5m for more temporary defences, such as barriers and pumps, at strategic locations around the country. By this winter, the government said, four times more temporary barriers will be available.

The review has also led to the setting up of more projects in which natural approaches, such as tree planting and moorland restoration, are used to slow the flow of water into rivers and reduce flood risk, including one in Cumbria, which was hit hard last winter.

“Last winter we saw just how devastating flooding can be. This review sets out clear actions so we are better prepared to respond quickly in the event of future flooding and can strengthen the nation’s flood defences,” said the environment secretary, Andrea Leadsom.

Ben Gummer, Cabinet Office minister, said: “The government has made clear that we expect water and telecoms companies to work ever closer together to improve their preparation and response to flooding, making sure lifelines such as mobile phone masts and water treatment works continue to function even when the great British weather is throwing its very worst at us.”

A previous flood review ordered by David Cameron after the 2014 floods was never delivered.

The review asked the Met Office to develop new plausible extreme rainfall scenarios. It added 20-30% to recently recorded extreme events, a figure it expects will mean only a 10% chance of worse rain in the next 10 years. “When we used a selection of the Environment Agency’s detailed models to predict the flooding associated with these extreme rainfall scenarios, we discovered (unsurprisingly) that it, too, was worse than anything we have seen to date,” the review states.

Speaking before the report’s publication, former floods minister Richard Benyon said farmers could to be paid to hold back floodwater under a post-Brexit rural payments system. “There is an opportunity now to completely rethink rural policy, and flood protection can come in as part of the way we support farmers and see farming as doing a public good when it protects communities from flooding,” he said.

Flood defence spending was cut sharply by David Cameron’s coalition government but partly reversed after severe floods in the winters of 2013-14 and 2015-16. In March’s budget, a £700m boost was pledged, meaning some English cities and towns that had been left without planned flood defences by the cuts are now getting the projects. The north of England, devastated by winter floods, is getting at least £150m of the new money, giving better protection for thousands of homes.

The Guardian had revealed in 2012 that 294 projects in line for funding were left stranded after the heavy cuts and exposed a series of places that were later flooded. These included Leeds and Kendal, which were submerged in last winter’s storms. Both places will now get new defences. The new money is being funded by an increase in insurance premium tax.

The government had been warned by a series of official bodies that flood risk was rising due to inadequate spending and was costing billions of pounds in damages. Government scientists have long warned that more severe flooding is the greatest impact of climate change in the UK.

Floods already cause £1bn of damage every year on average but the risks will rise yet further as climate change leads to more intense rainfall, bringing floods to places not currently in danger. The number of households at significant risk of flooding will more than double to 1.9m by 2050, if the global temperature rises by 4C.

One new approach is to use natural methods to slow the flow of water and tree planting has been shown to have prevented flooding at Pickering in North Yorkshire over Christmas, at a time when heavy rainfall caused devastating flooding across the region. A separate back-to-nature trial in Holnicote, Somerset, has also showed promising results.”

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/sep/08/flooding-uk-government-plans-for-more-extreme-rainfall

Swire works for ….. judge for yourself

Comment reposted:

Here is what Hugo has asked or spoken about since he became a back bencher:

The effect of Brexit on English students studying in Scotland

The effect of Brexit on foreign students studying in England (using Exeter Uni as an example – Ben Bradshaw’s constituency)

Progress of superfast broadband in Devon and Somerset and whether the SoS for CMS met BT to discuss broadband rollout in general

Four questions about the funding of the A30 upgrade east of Honiton and whether it will be dual carriageway (Neil Parish’s constituency)

Empty houses

Of course, the answers are pretty non-committal, so we learn nothing of real interest from these questions. Personally I would have thought that, with his many years experience as a minister successfully wriggling out of providing meaningful answers, he might be somewhat better at asking questions which would be specific enough to generate a useful answer..

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?q=&pid=11265&phrase=&exclude=&from=2016-07-15&to=&person=&section=&column=#n4

Hugo Swire – is he really OUR back bench MP?

Swire wrote on Twitter three hours ago:

Just had an excellent briefing from Saudi Foreign Minister HE Adel Al- Jeubir

Prior to that, his previous tweets were about Venezuela, Bristol University’s research into Lyme Disease and a whinge about the Express and Echo wanting to know where he went on holiday (he refused to tell them). Plus tweets on Brazil, Colombia and Florida.

And where does East Devon fit into his political life one wonders? Is he in denial that he is now just an ordinary back bench MP like hundreds of others?

Tonight there is an important meeting of Sidmouth Town Council to discuss the industrial units that Ford’s want to build on land belonging to Sir John Cave (his former landlord when he deigned to live in East Devon many years ago). Will he be there? In your dreams.

Quite a contrast to our other local MP Neil Parish – who spoke against further development in Feniton, attended local meetings and spoke at the planning inspection where it was turned down.

It seems Swire can’t accept his new demotion and still thinks he’s at the Foreign Office – and he might as well be for the good he has done for his constituency since he was fired by Theresa May along with his other Old Etonian mates George and David.

He always took a strong interest in Middle Eastern affairs – perhaps he sees opportunities for some lucrative consultation work which will keep him away from the trials and tribulations of his so-called constituency.

European energy use falls ahead of target – another Hinkley C nail in the coffin?

“Europe has met a landmark goal of slashing its energy consumption six years ahead of time, cutting greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to switching off about 400 power stations.

In 2014, the EU’s 28 member countries consumed 72m tonnes of oil equivalent less than had been projected for 2020, according to a report by the EU’s science arm, the Joint Research Centre (JRC). The figure matches Finland’s annual energy use.

Environmental campaigners described the achievement as “remarkable”. and “incredible” but the European commission was restrained.

“Final energy consumption is currently below the 2020 target,” a spokeswoman for the commission said. “The EU-28 are also on a good pathway to achieving the primary energy consumption target for 2020 if current efforts are maintained.”

Major energy savings were reported across all sectors in the study, with EU legislation driving efficiency gains in electrical products, industry installations, fuel economy and the housing sector.

Energy use in residential buildings fell by 9.5% between 2000 and 2014, second only to the industrial sector, where there was an energy drop of 17.6% over the same period.” …

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/sep/06/eu-energy-reduction-target-six-years-early-greenhouse-gas-emissions

Public parks face decline and neglect says Heritage Lottery Fund

“The UK’s hugely popular public parks face falling into decline and neglect as a result of budget cuts, a new report warns.

Park use is rising, with 57% of adults now visiting their park once a month or more, while 90% of families with children under five head to their local green space at least monthly, the State of UK Public Parks 2016 study reveals.

But the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) study warns a decline in the condition of parks predicted in a first report in 2014 is set to continue, with almost all park managers experiencing ongoing cuts as austerity squeezes local authority budgets.

Some 92% of park managers had seen budgets cut and 95% were facing more reductions, a worsening of the situation since 2014, according to a survey of 193 councils as part of the report.”

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/sep/07/uks-public-parks-face-decline-and-neglect-heritage-lottery-fund-report

Unfortunately, you won’t find the funds for flogging off part of the Knowle parkland for luxury pensioner apartments making its way to the remaining parkland. That’s all on its way to the new council HQ in Honiton.

“Four out of seven north-east councils vote against devolution Sunderland, Durham, South Tyneside and Gateshead reject proposals including election of north-eastern mayor”

” … Paul Watson, chair of the North East Combined Authority (Neca) of the seven councils, described the vote as disappointing. He said: “Each of the seven councils which make up the Neca has always made clear that they support the principle of devolution for the north-east. Following the outcome of the EU referendum and the subsequent changes within government, council leaders have been equally clear that to move forward, the new government must provide assurances regarding the terms of the region’s devolution deal.

“Extensive discussions and negotiations have taken place with government and within the region over recent months but unfortunately, despite our best efforts, it has not been possible to reach an agreement which all of the seven local authorities feel able to support. Although this is disappointing we will continue to work together with government to achieve our ambition of a stronger regional economy with improved opportunities for residents and businesses.” …

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/sep/06/north-east-councils-vote-against-devolution-sunderland-durham-south-tyneside-gateshead

Compare and contrast with Devon and Somerset where councils are happy to vote like sheep for devolution, knowing almost nothing about, having been given minimal information by their Leaders and their business pals on the Local Enterprise Partnership.

Freedom of Information and transparency

“The Information Commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, is to raise with ministers the transparency issues created by private companies providing an increasing proportion of public services.

Denham, who was previously information commissioner for British Columbia in Canada, replaced Christopher Graham at the Information Commissioner’s Office in July.

In an interview with Martin Rosenbaum of the BBC she said: “Private contractors above a certain threshold for a contract or doing some specific types of work could be included under the FOI Act. The government could do more to include private bodies that are basically doing work on behalf of the public.”

Denham also said she intended to review how the ICO tackles public authorities with a poor track record of handling FOI requests. This will include examining the threshold at which authorities that fail to meet deadlines for meeting requests become subject to special monitoring.
The Information commissioner said: “Looking at this from the outside, most of the public would have the view that more than one in 10 not getting a timely response to a request is not a sign of success.”

Denham also warned that the Government’s proposed introduction of fees for those who want to appeal against ICO decisions to the Information Rights Tribunal could lead to “a chill” in requesters using the appeal process.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=28253%3Ainformation-commissioner-to-raise-issue-of-transparency-in-era-of-greater-outsourcing&catid=59&Itemid=27

Pop-up brothels in seaside towns!

“Inspector Dave Meredith said: “Pop-up brothels are usually holiday lets or apartments that are booked on-line by sex workers or persons who manage sex workers.

“The owners of the premises are unaware of the activities of the persons making the booking, and generally assume they have come to Newquay for a holiday.

“The booking is usually for one week, after which the premises is vacated.

“Due to the short period of time the premises is used as a brothel, it is often difficult for the police to establish that sex workers are residing there before they move on.”

He added: “We should be under no illusion that prostitution is a victimless crime.

“Women who work in these pop up brothels are often subjects of human trafficking and work under duress.

“Modern slavery is of concern to us all, and includes sex trafficking where women are forced into the commercial sex industry and held against their will by force, fraud or coercion.”

A neighbour at one of the brothels said she saw a number of shifty-looking visitors entering the house over a four-day period with some mistakenly knocking on her door.

She said: “I’ve had two blokes knocking on my door – one at four in the morning – and my neighbours have been around asking if I’ve seen anything.

“It’s a holiday let but it’s just a normal house so you wouldn’t know any different.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/seaside-towns-are-being-plagued-by-pimps-and-prostitutes/story-29690076-detail/story.html

Cranbrook: why the high turnover of councillors?

From the Cranbrook Town Council website, a comment:

“Should we be worried about the high turnover rate of [Cranbrook] Town Councillors?

The turn over rate coupled with the extremely short period spent as a Councillor, by some, seems to point to some form of real and deep seated problem within the Council.

Generally working out what, or who, the problem is,is not difficult, resolving the problem however can be more difficult, but resolved it must be if the Council is going to be effective.

Just a thought! However resolved it must be!“