“Britain needs to hire 400,000 workers a year to keep building homes”

“That works out to the recruitment of one new construction worker every 77 seconds until 2021, according to construction consultancy Arcadis.

This is due to ever-increasing demands for building homes, as well as a workforce that is shrinking due to demographics, with not enough new recruits replacing those who are leaving, the Telegraph reports.

It calculated that if the UK increases the number of homes it builds every year to 270,000 – which is higher than the Government’s target of 200,000 yet below what some experts think is necessary to ease the housing crisis – more than 370,000 new workers will have to be employed.

The report also warned that if new recruits are not added to the workforce, the cost of building will shoot up. Carpenters and joiners are most needed, followed by plumbers, electricians, and bricklayers.

This calculation does not take into account any impact of lower immigration as a result of leaving the European Union. It found that if there is a ‘hard’ Brexit, such as the extension of the points-based immigration system currently in place for non-EU migrants, 215,000 fewer people from the EU will join the UK’s construction industry by 2020. One in eight construction workers in the UK are foreign; in London that figure is 23 per cent.

James Bryce, director of workforce planning at Arcadis, said: “What we have is not a skills gap; it is a skills gulf. Systemic under-investment in the nation’s workforce has contributed to a reduction in UK productivity.

“Construction employment is already down 15 per cent on 2008 and, quite simply, if we don’t have the right people to build the homes and infrastructure we need, the UK is going to struggle to maintain its competitive position in the global economy.”

It echoes a Government report carried out by Mark Farmer last year, called ‘Modernise or Die’, which warned that there was an acute skills shortage that would have to be solved by embracing off-site manufacturing of homes and other innovations. He has said that without any change, the workforce will decrease by 20-25 per cent in the next 10 years.”

http://www.bmmagazine.co.uk/newswire/britain-needs-hire-400000-workers-year-keep-building-homes/

Meanwhile, our nuclear-industry led LEP wants to concentrate on high-level nuclear industry jobs for “economic growth”. Doesn’t look like a winning formula.

“Government spending billions on free schools while existing schools crumble”

“Ministers are choosing to give billions of pounds to build new free schools while existing schools are crumbling into disrepair, Whitehall’s spending watchdog has found.

The National Audit Office has calculated that £6.7bn is needed to bring existing school buildings in England and Wales to a satisfactory standard.

The then education minister Michael Gove pledged two years ago to create 500 free schools by 2020. Auditors have concluded that the Department for Education is facing a £2.5bn bill to purchase land to build them.

In a report released on Wednesday, auditors have questioned whether the plans for so many new free schools will be value for money.

Responding to the report, Meg Hillier, the Labour chair of the public accounts committee, called for the money assigned to new free schools to be diverted to existing buildings. “This is taxpayers’ money that could be used to fund much-needed improvements in thousands of existing school buildings,” she said.

Auditors found that the education department has already spent £863m on land acquisitions for free schools over the last five years – in some cases paying premium prices because of a shortage of suitable sites.

While free schools were helping to meet the demand for additional school places in some areas, the NAO said that because local authorities did not control their numbers they were not necessarily “fully aligned” with their needs.

Some free schools were opening in areas where there were already plenty of places, creating “spare capacity” that could taffect the future financial sustainability of other schools in the area, it said. The education department has estimated that of the 113,500 new places being opened in mainstream free schools between 2015 and 2021, 57,000 would create spare capacity in other nearby schools, potentially affecting their future funding.

Official data indicated creation of spare places in 52 free schools which opened in 2015 alone would have a “moderate or high impact” on the funding of 282 other schools.

At the same time, the NAO warned the condition of existing schools was worsening, with around 40% of the schools estate built between 1945 and 1976 coming up for replacement or major refurbishment.

As a result, the cost of restoring all schools to a satisfactory condition was expected to double over the course of the five years to 2020-21. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/feb/22/government-spending-billions-on-free-schools-while-existing-schools-crumble

Swire: man of the (East Devon) people?

For most of the time we have had Hugo Swire as MP he has had other jobs that appear to take up most of his time – a Minister at the Foreign Office under former school pal Cameron and now Chairmanship of the Conservative Middle East Council. Both jobs involve international travel and lots of London schmoozing.

Is it time for East Devon Tories to think about what they REALLY want from OUR MP?

Not just someone who turns up in East Devon on the odd Friday then retires to his home in mid-Devon. Who turns up for as many photo opportunities as can be squeezed in to a few hours or sets up so-called debates on subjects he knows are emotive for electors but where said debates lead precisely nowhere.

Owl assumes Swire’s re-selection will be a shoo-in, not least because our Tory councillors like to bask in the reflected glory of a “Sir” – even if the meaningless title is handed out by a croney pal.

Isn’t it perhaps time now that we had an MP whose time is spent fighting our corner rather than accompanying arms salesmen to the Middle East?

Or maybe it’s time for an Independent MP who knows the constituency inside out and has tirelessly campaigned for local health services, local education, the local environment and local justice.

“Profits rise at Barratt despite the UK’s biggest housebuilder building fewer homes”

“Barratt Developments enjoyed a rise in profit before tax to £321m for the half year ended December 31, up 8.8pc from the same period in 2015.

It built nearly 5,000 fewer homes than in the half-year period in 2015, with total completions dropping from 7,626 in 2015 to 7,180 last year. However, it said completions outside London were at their highest level in nine years. …”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/02/22/profits-rise-barratt-despite-uks-biggest-housebuilder-building/

Audit and Governance – internal audit appears to be not too happy with governance

“… In our sample of capital projects, it was evident in speaking to staff that the Council had not anticipated the level of funding required for the Seaton Workshop project at an early stage, which may suggest that insufficient research was done to review the viability of the project prior to approval of the project/budget.

The Finance Team should consider whether evidence to support capital appraisals should be clearly documented. They should also consider implementing clear guidance on the level of initial assessment which should be required to be undertaken for capital projects if this is not clearly stated on any current policy/guidance. Any approach should be based on the level of risk and funding of the project as it was evident that some capital projects are lower in risk and value than others.

There is a risk that proposed projects are not being subject to the right level of assessment which could increase the likelihood of funding the wrong projects, and could also lead to delays and overspend to individual projects.”

Click to access 020317combinedagagenda.pdf

Estate rents – the law

” …Leaseholders are now used to the fact that a landlord or estate manager must consult before incurring charges; that service charges must be reasonable; and any dispute may be referred to the First Tier Tribunal of the Property Chamber for resolution.

Perversely, there is no implied test of reasonableness for estate charges and any dispute or challenge must be referred to the County Court through the small claims court procedure (assuming any estate charge will be under the current £10,000.00 threshold). This means that a freeholder will not be entitled to recover legal cost other than the limited fixed fees available under CPR45.

It seems freeholders on a private estate find themselves in a position of having to pay whatever charge the estate manager decides with little to no room for dispute save for an expensive and time consuming determination by a District Judge in the County Court. Freeholders also have no right to receive accounts or to be provided with information relating to the charges claimed unless express provision is included in the deed of transfer which, in the writer’s experience, is unlikely. As more and more estates are built comprising a mixture of leasehold and freehold homes, it is surly time for the law to be amended in this area with freehold owners granted the same rights and protections as their leasehold counterparts..”

http://www.solegal.co.uk/estate-rent-charges-beware-buying-freehold-homes-private-estates/

You can buy yourself out of these annual charges – for a price:

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/rentcharges

“EDF faces £1m a day bill to keep French nuclear reactor offline”

“The prolonged closure of a major French atomic reactor after an explosion this month probably costs EDF at least £1m a day, according to experts.

The nuclear plant operator, which will spend £18bn building the UK’s first new nuclear power station in a generation, shut unit 1 at its Flamanville plant after a fire broke out in the turbine hall.

The company initially estimated it would switch on the reactor within a week, but later pushed the date to the end of March. Work begins this week on replacing damaged equipment.

The unexpectedly long closure adds to the financial pressure on EDF, which last week reported a 6.7% decline in core earnings to €16.4bn (£14bn) in 2016. Closures of its French nuclear plants last year, partly for safety checks, have already cost the 85% state-owned company an estimated €1.3bn.

Prof Neil C Hyatt, head of nuclear materials chemistry at the University of Sheffield, said the lost revenue from the reactor closure in Normandy could be £1m per day. …

… “It took operator EDF almost a week to progressively correct the original outage estimate from one day to 50 days. EDF has provided no information as to why the outage time went from a few days to seven weeks,” said Mycle Schneider, a nuclear energy consultant based in Paris.

The 1.3GW reactor at Flamanville is one of a dozen of EDF’s French nuclear fleet currently offline, which the company said was usual for this time of the year.

It did not say why the restart date for the reactor had been revised four times, or why it had jumped from a few days to more than six weeks. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/feb/21/edf-faces-1m-a-day-bill-to-keep-french-nuclear-reactor-offline

“Council questioned about Exmouth seafront application”

“District bosses say they will not begin building on Exmouth seafront if an application is approved, despite saying it would permit them to ‘take forward development’.

East Devon District Council (EDDC) has put in a reserved matters application for Queen’s Drive, seeking detailed permission for facilities. EDDC says this will extend outline permission, and allow consultation, but opponents say it would allow building to begin.

Seeking clarification, the Journal approached EDDC, citing the Government’s Planning Portal website, which says: “When all of the reserved matters have been approved, work may begin.”

In response, a spokesman said: “A planning permission that can be implemented is very important. Therefore, the council has applied for approval of matters which were reserved under the outline planning permission. In other words, reserved matters is permission to take forward development, but the council’s development role is limited in budget and authority to build the new road and car park only. The rest of the site will be delivered later and in full consultation with the public.”

When the Journal asked why the application was needed for the road and car park when reserved matters for these had already been approved, the spokesman said: “Yes, the council has a reserved matters approval already for the road and car park but it is necessary for the council to secure reserved matters for the entire site (phases two and three as well as phase one) before the road and car park can be built. In any event, the council will only start works on moving them when it is sure that [developer] Grenadier has secured planning permission for its watersports centre.

“Reserved matters on the rest of the site also enables Grenadier to take forward their plans to consultation, design and planning.”

In response, Independent EDA district councillor Megan Armstrong, who has previously criticised the plans, said: “Why don’t EDDC simply acknowledge the fact that approval of a reserved matters application is a full permission to build without further planning applications or consultation?

“The Government says ‘When all of the reserved matters have been approved, work may begin on the site’. So why doesn’t the council come clean instead of using back door tactics and obscure wording?

“I also find it most bizarre that the district council should apply for this when it seems that it has no intention of using it. What other planning applicant would do this, and at such huge cost to the council tax payer?”

Ottery St Mary hospital to lose stroke unit

“Health bosses say the move will benefit patients, who will be able to access more ‘joined-up’ care, 24-hour medical cover and a range of specialist staff.

But it presents a further blow to Ottery’s community-funded hospital – that has hosted eastern Devon’s stroke unit on a temporary basis since November 2014 – following the decision to cuts all of the town’s inpatient beds in July 2015.

The move back to the RD&E is the final stage in completing recommendations from a 2013 consultation led by Northern, Eastern and Western Devon Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and the Stroke Association.

RD&E stroke consultant Martin James said: “Moving the stroke rehabilitation unit onto the same site as our acute stroke unit is a key part of plans to improve stroke services for all people in Exeter and eastern Devon.

“The move will see a range of specialists – including nurses, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, dieticians, and speech and language therapists – working closely together to provide seamless care for people with stroke. Patients will benefit from greater continuity in care and 24-hour medical cover on site and staff will form part of a bigger specialist team, with increased opportunities to develop skills and gain input from a range of stroke specialists.”

The stroke rehabilitation facility will be transferred to the RD&E’s Yealm Ward and hospital rehabilitation services currently sited there are due to relocate into the community as part of a move towards caring for people in their own homes.

The RD&E NHS Foundation Trust says this is part of efforts to improve outcomes for frail and older people by reducing reliance on inpatient hospital care which, it says, can impact negatively on people’s rehabilitation.

In addition to the new facility on Yealm Ward, stroke patients will continue to benefit from the ‘Early Supported Discharge (ESD)’ initiative across eastern Devon.

This service enables people to return home as soon as possible after a stroke by providing support, specialist care and rehabilitation in patients’ own houses.

The trust says evidence shows that patients who receive ESD spend less time in hospital and can have better outcomes.

Adel Jones, the RD&E’s integration director, said: “These changes will help improve clinical outcomes for our patients and ensure that services are delivered where they are most effective. This means providing the best acute care possible for the critically ill in hospital and helping people who are able to be discharged rehabilitate in their own homes with the right support and interventions.”

http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/ottery_st_mary_hospital_to_lose_stroke_unit_1_4897659

Stuck up Cranbrook? Deeds said to ban “work vehicles”

Below in an exchange on the Cranbrook Town Council page regarding a meeting about estate rents due to developers.

Did someone just copy the deeds to houses at Poundbury perchance?

“Is this drop in just for the estate charge or can I bring up the issue that’s cropping up regarding the commercial work vans / cars not being aloud [stet] at all on the Cranbrook estates?

How would any work be done in cranbrook if work vans were not allowed in? How would you police this? You obviously don’t have a works vehicle, but this would never come into consideration as this is a town and not a private estate.

It’s In everyone’s deeds and yes we have a work vehicle and have had letters regarding the work van and it not aloud [stet] on the estate hence why I want to discuss it with the estate management.”

Check your deeds carefully if you live in Cranbrook!

Cranbrook: “Estate rent charges”: another developer cash cow?

There is much controversy in Cranbrook, where householders are hit with a double whammy: “estate rent charges” AND council tax.

In an effort to clear up confusion, the town council offered an explanation for the difference between the two:

The estate rent charge covers the maintenance of communal areas in Cranbrook before those are transferred from private into public ownership, including the management of the Country Park, road maintenance, litter picking, bin emptying, maintenance of play parks and street lighting.

Now Owl, being a cynic thinks: Why would developers want to transfer the management of the country park, road maintenance, litter picking, bin emptying, maintenance of play parks and street lighting to the town, district or county councils when they can get the money them from residents AND charge administration fees and overheads on these same costs? An extra 25%-40% is a ball-park figure for such extra costs, which do not have to be explained.

As an example, should roads be handed over to DCC and developers wreck them with plant and machinery movements, digging trenches, etc the DEVELOPERS would have to pay those costs.

More worryingly, why would they want to transfer the country park management to the district council when, if they hold on to it long enough, they might gain legal ownership of it and get permission to build on it (flood plains can be raised …). Owl is no lawyer, but bets developers know their rights down to the last crossed t and the last dotted i.

Also, the county, district and town councils will likely drag their heels as, once taken into public ownership, costs will necessarily have to be passed on to council taxes. Both sides therefore benefit from the status quo, the only losers being residents.

Owl recalls that police could not stop boy racers in Cranbrook because roads had not been adopted by Devon County Council so were private land. Is this still the case?

With all these worries, no wonder town councillors are dropping out at an alarming rate.

“Battered Bovis eyes sell-offs as profit pain rises”

Possible closure of business outside the south-east … hhhm. Might be a good time for EDDC to do due diligence …

“… Schroders fund manager Andrew Brough is said to have urged Berkeley Homes to put Bovis out of its misery with a bid earlier this year, but sources close to Bovis stressed the review was likely to focus on land sales rather than a sale of the overall business.

Clyde Lewis of Peel Hunt said: “In our view, the likelihood of the company being bought by any other industry players looks remote given the liquidity in the land market.

“Therefore, the key to the shares performing better will be the group’s ability to turn itself around operationally. Without knowing who the chief executive will be to lead this charge, we see no need to get involved.”

Shore Capital’s Robin Hardy added that a review of the firm’s structure could also mean a “closure of operations outside the South-East and a retrenchment to a smaller and more regional business”.

Bovis held the dividend payout unchanged today in a bid to assuage shareholders but Hardy added that the problems could “have deeper roots” and take more than a year to resolve.”

http://www.standard.co.uk/business/battered-bovis-eyes-selloffs-as-profit-pain-rises-a3471121.html

Bovis: share price falls, housing output forecast reduced, dividend raised

“Under-pressure housebuilder Bovis Homes PLC (LON:BVS), whose boss quit in January just days after the firm warned it would not meet market expectations, saw its 2016 profits fall by 3% after a “difficult year” and said it will build fewer homes in 2017

The FTSE 250-listed firm saw its pre-tax profits fall to £154.7mln for the full-year to December 31, down from £160.1mln a year earlier and below the firm’s own forecast of £160mln-£170mln, even though revenues rose by 11% to £1.054bn.

In reaction to the profits fall, Bovis shares dropped over 9% in early trading, down 75.5p to 765.5p, dragging other houserbuilders lower in its wake.

Bovis surprised the market at the end of December by saying it would miss market forecasts after failing to build the volume of homes it anticipated in 2016.

The group built nearly 4,000 homes last year but said it expected volumes to fall by between 10% and 15% in 2017 before a return to “normal industry production,” despite almost all its peers building more homes and posting bumper profits.

Earl Sibley, Bovis’s interim chief executive said: “We have a clear set of operational priorities for 2017 and are fully committed to improving our levels of customer service and delivering high quality homes this year and in the future.

“The fundamentals of the business remain strong with a robust financial position and high quality land bank.”

In a note to clients, analysts at Liberum pointed out: “Management has warned that to resolve the quality issues that hit 2016, it will slow production down by 10-15% in 2017 and that costs will rise as it invests in its processes once again.

“This suggests that 2017 consensus EPS estimates could fall by around 25%.”

However, repeating a ‘hold’ rating and 775p price target on the stocks, they added: “The 2016 NAV of 757p should act as a support for the shares, and management has pledged to maintain the 45p dividend in 2017.”

Despite the 2016 profits fall, Bovis still raised its dividend to 45p per share, up 13% from the 40p paid in 2015.

In its statement, he firm said: “Whilst there will inevitably be an impact on our earnings and cashflow from the actions we are taking in 2017, the Board intends to recommend maintaining the dividend at the level declared for 2016, confirming its confidence in the future potential of the business.”

http://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/173370/bovis-homes-drops-as-2016-profits-fall-by-3-after-a-difficult-year-expects-to-build-fewer-homes-in-2017-173370.html

The perils of “new build” homes

A commentator on the post below on the Guardian website says:

Because they are all about volume and speed. They’re usually predominantly timber framed, dry lined wooden boxes. I don’t believe they’ll stand the test of time.

They bang them up as quickly as possible and the perception is that there’s more money in doing that and sorting out the inevitable snagging problems later than there is in taking the time to do it properly in the first place.

The rooms are too small – did you know they use furniture that is smaller than standard in the show homes to give the illusion of space? When you put your own double bed in the biggest bedroom there’ll barely be room to walk round it.

Land is a valuable asset so your garden will barely be big enough for a swingball.

There are also now stories about homes being sold leasehold with the freeholds being sold on to third parties and not made available to the homeowners so that remortgaging or selling after a few years requires a new lease which the freeholders can charge a mint for. All sorts.

I realise that many people don’t have much choice but if you do, I recommend that you steer clear.”

and

1,400 out of 4,000 is 35% and a better description than ‘some’ which suggests a lot less than 1 in 3.

Pre-fact world headline: ‘Customers ripped off as 1 in 3 Bovis homes sold unfinished’ “

and

How these developers can get away with this is beyond me. Isn’t this a con? How can you sell a cardboard box for £200k + and receive government incentives for the privilege?”

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/feb/20/bovis-to-pay-7m-to-compensate-customers-angry-at-poorly-built-homes

“Bovis to pay £7m to compensate customers angry at poorly built homes”

Owl wonders how many affected homes are in East Devon, given the coruscating remarks made about the company here recently – particularly in Axminster by Councillor Douglas Hull, though Councillor Moulding did not seem concerned.

Oh, and Cranbrook … Cranbrook … poor, poor Cranbrook. Already with district heating problems, estate rents and garages too small for cars …

“Bovis Homes is being forced to pay £7m for “remedial action” to fix customers’ homes, after irate owners spent their own money fixing faults at newly built properties.

Angry homeowners formed a Facebook group with some accusing Bovis of pressuring them to move in to incomplete houses to hit sales targets.

Bovis’s boss on Monday apologised to customers for the poor quality of their houses and promised he would “make sure [we] finish their homes to their satisfaction”.

Earl Sibley, Bovis’s interim chief executive, announced the £7m “customer care provision” as home owners prepare to protest at the company’s annual meeting in Tunbridge Wells in May. …

… More than 1,400 have joined the Bovis Homes Victims Group on Facebook while others have posted a series of videos showing their poorly built homes on YouTube. Marc Holden, one of the group’s administrators, had said: “We are not going to stop our active campaign. There are a lot of unhappy people.

“We were getting a lot of people joining the group just before Christmas who were posting about being ‘encouraged’ to complete by 23 December, some were being offered money and other incentives.”

The company conceded that some customers were “offered an incentive to complete before the year end” but insisted that all of the homes were “habitable”.

Chad Clifton said he and his wife were “forced” to complete on their four-bedroom Bovis house in Brockworth, Gloucestershire, on 23 December and found the fridge had not been fitted and that the hallway was unfinished – just two points out of a list of 115 defects. They were offered £350 and a free move. “We were told we didn’t have much choice – if the house is ready we have to complete on 23 December.”

Rob Elmes said he was offered £3,000 if he and his wife completed on 23 December, but declined the offer because there were so many defects with the £320,000 three-bedroom property in Inkberrow, Worcestershire. “It became one of the most stressful weeks we have endured,” Elmes said. “[It was] not the Christmas we were hoping for.” …

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/feb/20/bovis-to-pay-7m-to-compensate-customers-angry-at-poorly-built-homes

Oh dear, Swire really doesn’t like the Lib Dems – surprise! Real Tories don’t eat tofu!

Atticus column, Sunday Times, page 21:

“Not every Conservative felt as comfortable in coalition as David Cameron. Former Foreign Office minister [Sir – Owl refuses to recognise croney titles] Hugo Swire, interviewed by the Institute of Government, explains the advantages of winning a majority in 2015: “We didn’t have to listen to the Lib Dems whingeing on about compulsory sandals or tofu for lunch or whatever.” Is that quite the spirit?”

Owl says: stereotyping, puerile and arrogant. Nothing new there then.

“Tory Councillor ferried in from France to vote for cuts”

“Despite living in France, Eve Barisic, Conservative Devon County Councillor for Newton Abbot North, managed to make it to County Hall… to help scrap school crossing patrols – including one in her own division.

It’s not that often that Eve does make it over The Channel, and in fact she missed the meeting about changes to Devon’s children’s centres – including one in her own division.

Of course, living in a different country (let alone county) to her constituency and not turning up to meetings hasn’t stopped her picking up the £10,000 that goes with the role.

But staying in her county councillor position also means that she can be rolled out to vote for cuts. Not least because the rest of her Tory chums have kept quiet about how poor her behaviour in the role has been.

You’d think that the MP would have said something, but Newton Abbot’s Anne Marie Morris is not about to throw stones about being an effective politician, now is she?

So the lollipop people are scrapped, Devon faces cuts to services and an increase in Council Tax and Eve trundles back to France.

(There was a rumour that Eve would be standing for election again in May – we tweeted her the question in December 2015, but still haven’t heard back. We’ll let you know what we find out.)”

http://www.theprsd.co.uk/2016/02/20/tory-councillor-ferried-in-from-france-to-vote-for-cuts/

ALTERNATIVE CANDIDATES FOR HER AREA URGENTLY NEEDED!

Business rates row intensifies

“Ministers try to defuse business rates row

Philip Hammond, the chancellor, is examining ways of making the scheme fairer after widespread outrage at the first rates overhaul in seven years, which will come into effect in April.

Small businesses face huge increases while some of the biggest companies in Britain — including Amazon and large supermarkets — will benefit from rate cuts on some of their properties.

The chancellor will be looking at ways of ensuring things can be done a little fairer
Senior government sources insisted they would stick with the revaluation but conceded that more might need to be done to ease the pain.

Hammond is understood to be examining ways of preventing a “cliff edge” increase after business groups signed a letter demanding changes. But he is reluctant to pour more money into a fund to help those worst hit.

A senior government source said: “The chancellor has paid very close attention to the way this has played out over the last week. If you take money for this, it comes away from other things. The system has been fixed to ensure there are far more winners than losers.

“However, the chancellor is attuned to this and will be looking at ways of ensuring that things can be done a little fairer”. He will want to prevent “heavy-handed” implementation of the revaluation so as to ensure “the system never has a cliff edge like this ever again”.

The shift came as Grant Shapps, the former local government minister, said ministers should “quietly drop” the planned revaluation. He said he was “concerned” that the changes “may undo progress” on reviving Britain’s high streets. “Might be better not to revaluate BizRates,” he tweeted, adding that he would “need convincing transition plans will help”.

Shapps’s intervention came as the chief executive of Sainsbury’s waded into the row, calling for “fundamental reforms”. Mike Coupe described the current setup as “archaic” and called for a “level playing field”. He said: “The way it currently stands, there is an advantage for those without bricks-and-mortar operations so there’s a strong case for a level playing field in business rates and taxation generally.”

The Sunday Times has established that large supermarkets are to benefit from business rate cuts of up to 25% on their out-of-town stores while nearby struggling high streets are to be “hammered”.

Reporters analysed the top 20 towns being hit by the biggest rise in business rates, compared with the changes in rates at the local out-of-town supermarket.

Thirteen out of the 20 supermarkets were set for business rate cuts, five were having no changes and two faced higher rates.

Traders in Southwold, Suffolk, say the “rateable value” of their properties — which is used to calculate business rates — has risen by 177%. By contrast the nearest Tesco superstore — a 30-minute drive away in Lowestoft — has had its rateable value cut by 7%.

Rebecca Bishop, owner of the Two Magpies Bakery, who is facing an increase in her rates from £2,000 to £11,883, said: “The government is encouraging the growth of online retailing and out- of-town shopping and killing the high street.”

The fall in business rates for supermarkets in the 20 towns worst hit by the increases — including Cobham in Surrey, Padstow in Cornwall and Crowthorne in Berkshire — is reflected across the country.

The Valuation Office Agency is updating the rateable value of business properties on April 1 this year. The last time they were all valued was in 2010.

The rates rises have triggered a political storm with more than 500,000 traders facing increases.

The annual rates are calculated by multiplying the rateable value by a figure set by the government, which is up to 47.9p for 2017-18. There is also transitional relief to limit the sudden changes in bills.

Supermarkets are enjoying a rates cut because the rental values of their out-of-town stores has fallen.

Analysis by CVS, a business rates specialist, has found that the rateable values for 2,172 supermarkets in 2017 is £2.76bn compared with £2.93bn in 2010. The average superstore will see its rateable value fall by 5.9% or £79,368.

Sainbury’s said this weekend, however, that it expected its rates bill to rise from £483m to £500m.

CVS said it would “stick in the throat” of many small businesses trying to keep their “heads above water” while the warehouses of large online retailers such as Amazon and various superstores were getting business rates cuts.

It added that the government had said in 2015 that it would conduct a structural review of business rates but this was never delivered.

Mark Rigby, chief executive of CVS, said: “April will serve a hammer blow to small shops and the consideration should now be to ensure that they are in fact paying fair and accurate rates.”

The Department for Communities and Local Government said most businesses will either not see their rates rise, or will enjoy a fall.

It added that 520,000 ratepayers will see their bills increase, 920,000 will see them drop and 420,000 will see no change.”

Sunday Times, 19th Feb 17 (paywall)

“Support for public ownership” – greater than Brexit

Buses

57% want councils to be allowed to set up new public bus companies – 22% oppose this (Survation, 2016)
46% want more public ownership of buses – 11% want more private ownership (Survation, 2016)

Energy

68% want public ownership (YouGov, 2013)

NHS
84% want public ownership (YouGov, 2013)
65% of the public would not feel comfortable using GP services provided by a private company like Atos, Capita, G4S or Serco (Survation, 2014)
74% want hospitals in public ownership (YouGov, 2015)

Parks
70% of the public want public ownership (Survation, 2016)
75% believe councils should have a statutory duty to protect public parks (Survation, 2016)

Prisons
62% want prisons in public ownership (YouGov, 2015)
28% of people think it is appropriate for private companies to run prisons
25% think it is appropriate for private companies to provide court services (Survation, 2014)

Rail
66% want public ownership (YouGov, 2013)
59% want public ownership of Network Rail (Survation, 2015)
20% were in favour of reprivatising the East Coast line (Survation, 2013)

Water
71% want public ownership (Sunday Express, 2012)

Public assets
49% want the Green Investment Bank in public ownership
20% want it to be privatisated (Survation, 2015)
70% want the Land Registry in public ownership (Survation, 2015)
60% want National Air Traffic Services in public ownership (Survation, 2015)
64% want the student loan book to be in public ownership (Survation, 2015)
67% want the Royal Mail in public ownership (YouGov, 2013)

In-house services
61% of the public think that local and central government should try to run services in-house first – before outsourcing (Survation, 2015)
50% are against the current outsourcing trend and want more public services run in-house, 22% want more outsourcing (Survation, 2015)
80% believe that when a public service is put out to tender, there should always be an in-house bid (Survation, 2013)

Accountability
73% of the public think they should be consulted before any outsourcing decisions (Survation, 2015)
68% believe they need a legal right to consultation and information on outsourcing (Survation, 2015)
88% support a right to recall private companies when they do a bad job of running public services (Survation, 2013)
54% think the public sector is more accountable than the private sector (Survation, 2013)

Transparency
67% think that public service contracts and performance data of private companies should be publicly available (Survation, 2015)
60% think Freedom of Information laws should apply to private companies running public services (YouGov, 2016)
48% (mistakenly) believe private contractors are legally obliged to respond to Freedom of Information requests (Survation, 2013)

Outsourcing companies
64% distrust outsourcing companies
21% trust outsourcing companies – compared to NHS (79%), the police (65%) and the armed forces (79%) (Survation, 2014)
69% of the public think Atos, Capita, G4S, Serco are motivated by maximising profit
38% think this should be important (Survation, 2014)
80% think providing the best service to the public should motivate Atos, Capita, G4S and Serco
22% of the public think this is the case (Survation, 2014)
59% think more regulation of private companies running public services is needed
16% think there is adequate regulation already (Survation, 2014)
58% believe G4S and Serco should be banned from all government contracts if found guilty of fraud (Survation, 2013)

https://weownit.org.uk/public-solutions/support-public-ownership

Developments outside village built-up boundaries since 2010 – all 17 pages of them

The result of a recent Freedom of Information request to East Devon District Council:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/386878/response/933239/attach/html/3/Outside%20BUAB.XLSX.xlsx.html