Rotherham Council – just taken over by central government – BBC news main story tonight

The following headlines and story relating to the same council, , from only a few years ago, may have some bearing on our own District Council’s office relocation extravaganza.

£9.9m bill to equip Rotherham Council’s new offices
Published date: 26 August 2011 | Published by: Gareth Dennison
113998%20New%20Council%20Offices
Bill: Rotherham Council’s new offices.

ROTHERHAM Borough Council’s multi-million pound new offices will cost £9.9 million to furnish.

The £3 million-a-year rent paid to regeneration group Evans for Riverside House does not include kitting out the buildings.

The first staff will begin moving in before Christmas and the authority insists the total cost is less than staying put in its ageing existing buildings.

Claire Wright lays down challenge to Hugo Swire

CLAIRE WRIGHT CHALLENGES HUGO SWIRE TO PUT RESIDENTS BEFORE PARTY AND TO STOP THE SAVAGE CUTS IN DEVON’S GRANTS

Claire Wright, the Devon County Councillor and Independent candidate running against the current MP, Hugo Swire, at the General Election, has challenged her opponent.

“On 10th February, the House of Commons will be deciding on Council Budget cuts for the next financial year. The leader of the Conservative-led Devon County Council, which has secured savings of £128 million since 2009, has warned that further cuts of £50 million will have to be made in the next financial year and another £34 million in the following year.

“In the past, Mr Swire, you have voted for annual cuts without even making an argument on behalf of your constituents. As your website still claims that you were ‘sent to the Commons to speak up and vote for the people of East Devon’, speak up now!

“The hard-pressed people in our constituency, not least the large number of carers who face problems as the local NHS struggles to cope on an unfair grant, need help. We are confronted with the prospect of more savage cuts which will cause massive hardship, especially to those who are already severely penalised by earlier reductions in expenditure. They are often the people least able to cope with the cuts and many of them find it hard to believe that ‘we are all in this together’”.

Claire Wright continued. “Devon is the third largest county in England, has a higher than average-age local population, a lower population density and is the destination for huge numbers of holiday makers. Their needs, too, must be catered for if tourism, a key factor in the local economy, is to be sustained. The county cannot stand any more swingeing cuts. Who would have thought, just a few years ago, that many in the constituency would have to visit food banks?

“The relatively less difficult cuts in expenditure have already caused genuine hardship. Now the prospect of even more reductions implies a bleak future for thousands already suffering from the impact of earlier decreases. More cuts will make it even more difficult to meet core duties in protecting children, the vulnerable and the elderly.

“We have seen threats to, or closures of, inpatient beds at community hospitals, minor injuries units, youth centres, libraries, care homes, day centres and children’s homes and services. Now, if further drastic cuts are imposed, we shall see, for example, reductions in county-sponsored bus services, which will have a grim impact on the elderly who lack private transport and are too frail to carry heavy shopping so have to use local bus services frequently. Some £1.7 million must be saved from the budget of £5.376 million for 200 public council-run bus services which carry 4.5 million passengers annually.

“The allowance for school children is £300 per head per year less than for children elsewhere. Will it be cut again? The council has said that the school crossings budget must be cut by £100,000 per year in the next two years.

“Highway budgets are being cut to our extensive network and some of our roads will no longer be gritted, resulting in more accidents which will add to the pressure on the already challenged Royal Devon and Exeter hospital. Eight million square metres of grass verge will no longer be cut. What impression will that give our tourists? The Coalition government wants councils to use their reserves: Devon’s reserves of £14 million would vanish in a few days.

“I am angry at the way in which the Coalition government spends our money. They spent £70 million setting up the unwanted Police and Crime Commissioners and wasted £3 billion on the reorganisation of the NHS. Now they are proposing to spend £50 billion on the HS2 project. It is shocking that this money is being wasted when the when the government is cutting public services back strongly and causing hardship.

“As the fifth largest economy in the world it is ridiculous that some people in the UK have to choose between heating and eating. We can offer a better life to our citizens through eliminating waste, redistributing national income more fairly and securing a higher tax take from those companies, which, obeying the law, nevertheless deny this country billions of pounds in tax income each year.

Even Devon County Council Conservative leader, Councillor John Hart has publicly urged Devon MPs to back the council and vote against the cuts.

“I call on Mr Swire to choose to support the residents of East Devon, instead of his political party and, on February 10th to argue against and vote against the savage cuts.

“Councils united against Pickles’ spin”

The headline says it all really. Pretty pass when it’s your own side doing the criticising:

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Council-united-Pickles-8216-spin-8217-cuts-start/story-25855309-detail/story.html

Folly and hubris in politics

From The Guardian editorial on Mrs Thatcher’s disastrous decision to go along with Dorset MP Oliver Letwin’s idea of poll tax, in spite of more sensible advice from Tory “wets”:

“A few years before Lady Thatcher and Mr Letwin became obsessed with the poll tax, the American historian Barbara Tuchman wrote a book about the march of follies in human affairs, from the Trojan to the Vietnamese war. [She] argued that a folly’s success was marked by the determination of its supporters to pursue a foolish and failed policy in the face of clear arguments in favour of an alternative course. The poll tax was Mrs Thatcher’s folly. But her supporters and her party have not yet learned the lessons of her act of hubris.”

Cabinet Agenda 5 January 2015 at 5.30 pm (Knowle)

Wednesday 5 January 2015, 5.30 p.m. Knowle

Much about Cranbrook, Exmouth seafront, Thelma Hulbert Gallery, beach huts and next year’s budget.

Details to follow but one little paragraph may be of interest:

“Members have been presented with the Medium Term Financial Plan estimates showing a budget deficit in the order of £2.8m by 2020/21. This figure is an estimate which will continually vary and will also need to reflect on the messages in the recent Autumn Statement of continuing reductions in public spending, but what this position clearly indicates is a significant projected gap between what the Council is spending and the resources it will have available to it.”

Click to access 070115-cabinet-combined-agenda-public-version.pdf

“Merry Christmas EDDC (very) senior officer(s)” from your boss Mr Pickles!

Local authorities could be required to set out how they appraise the performance of their highest paid staff, the Communities Secretary has said.
In a response to a select committee report on senior pay in local government, Eric Pickles said councils would also have to explain the reason behind bonuses and how they dealt with poor performance.

The minister said he had instructed officials at the Department for Communities and Local Government to examine how the Local Government Transparency Code 2014 might be amended to bring in the changes.

” … Pickles said: “When we came to power hundreds of directors, executives and strategists were lining their pockets with hardworking families’ cash. But this government’s focus on excessive pay grounded pay rises received by senior council staff which had soared out of control during the noughties.

“But there is still more to do and councils should be focusing resources on protecting frontline services and keeping council tax down rather than throwing away taxpayers’ money.”

The Communities Secretary added:

“Local taxpayers would be shocked to learn their council still has many highly paid staff on its payroll while pleading poverty and seeking to increase council tax. The gravy train is over and town halls must prove to hardworking families they are getting value for money from top earners.”

The DCLG claimed that more than 2,000 town hall staff in the UK were still taking home more than £100,000 a year. …”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=21162:pickles-to-require-councils-to-set-out-how-they-appraise-top-paid-staff&catid=57&Itemid=25

Relocation plan 100b (Honiton/Exmouth) doesn’t add up … at all

Skypark has been abandoned because, at around £8 million, it could not be funded from the sales of the Heathpark site, the Knowle site and Manstone Depot.

Now,  Heathpark is getting no income from a supermarket, Knowle is worth less than they expected, no-one wants Manstone Depot and the cost of the dual site has gone up to £10 million.

If they couldn’t afford 8 million by selling 3 sites how can they afford £10 million with only the reduced-priced Knowle for sale?

Something’s not right here!

Is there something in the water in this part of Devon?

I ask because a councillor doesn’t comprehend basic English, a district council can deal only in imaginary numbers and just now, on Spotlight, someone from the Clinical Commissioning Group has confirmed that people in our area who are morbidly obese or who smoke will have their care rationed but people who have a drug and/or alcohol problem won’t have their care rationed.

Add to that people who will now only have only one cataract fixed and those with hearing problems in both ears who will get only on hearing aid and you begin to wonder if you are in your own nightmare.

What is going on?

A question – will efficiency savings be reflected in council tax reductions?

If a “prestigious” Skypark HQ for all  500 fte EDDC staff was going to cost £8 million and an HQ at Honiton and an outpost in Exmouth is going to cost at least £10 million for half that number of staff, just how “prestigious” is the new HQ going to be – gold plated?

And if half the staff will be going and the “expensive to maintain” Knowle is flogged off along with most services being digitised and/or privatised plus all that lovely income from developers putting in their big planning applications – will we be getting a council tax reduction of at least 50%?

50% of EDDC staff to be made redundant?

In Cabinet papers is the following:

...”In the interim, Exmouth Town Hall has been vacated by Devon County Council Services and represents a new opportunity within the relocation … new HQ in Honiton can be restricted in size and cost to a 170 desk equivalent scale with an improved Exmouth Town Hall for 80 EDDC staff ...”

This is a total of 250 full-time equivalent staff

Click to access 031214-cabinet-agenda-public-version.pdf

According to this link, there are around 500 current full-time equivalent staff currently employed by EDDC

http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/employee_statistics

Does this mean that 50% of staff will be made redundant in the next two or three years? And if 50% of staff are to be lost, surely the newer part of Knowle offices would accommodate the rest as EDDC has made it clear that for much of the time, some staff will be constantly on the road or hot-desking?

Or will so many people be working so often from home that they will have to declare this for tax purposes?

Or is it yet another case of figures not making sense? Or the new reality of how the move must be funded in these austerity days?

Council vanity projects

Putting in the words “council new offices vanity projects” brings up SCORES of entries for councils all over the country wanting to spend millions and millions of pounds on themselves. Here are just a few entries from the first couple of pages. All of these examples have taken place in the last 5 years during which we have had a dreadful recession and austerity cuts and there are many more examples:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/deprived-newham-watches-bemused-as-council-ponders-move-from-110m-building-after-just-three-years-8836972.html

http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/news/local/streathamnews/9606243.Lambeth_Council_office_plan_branded__vanity_project_/r/?ref=rss

http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/politics/new_town_hall_plan_for_tower_hamlets_branded_expensive_vanity_project_1_1940016

http://insidecroydon.com/2013/01/11/140-million-the-cost-of-our-councils-secrecy-and-vanity/
http://www.eadt.co.uk/news/politics_2_480/coastal_new_council_offices_could_cost_millions_1_3158985

It’s rather ironic when pensioners are told to heat only one room because they can’t afford their heating bills to see councillors being profligate with our money because they want their taste of luxury.

More on those IT partnerships

After news that EDDC is spearheading an IT parthership with Exeter and Teignbridge,we reported on the fiasco in Somerset when an IT partnership went spectacularly wrong here:

http://eastdevonalliance.org/2014/10/01/what-happens-when-shared-and-partnership-it-services-go-wrong/

Following on from this is this critique which could equally be applied to the Skypark vanity project:

Mutual incentives?

The Somerset report says each side in an outsourcing relationship needs to be motivated by similar incentives. But can that ever happen? Councils exist to provide good public services as cheaply as possible. Suppliers exist to make as much money as possible.  There can only be similar incentives if a council is so inefficient that there’s enough spare cash to cover council savings and the supplier’s profits.  If there isn’t the spare cash, the council, in its enthusiasm to do something different by outsourcing, can simply fictionalise the figures for benefits and potential savings.

This creative (and legal) exercise is perfectly possible given the depth of the conjecture needed to project costs and savings over 6 years or more.  Part-time councillors who are considering a big outsourcing contract have the time only to glance at summary documents or the preferred supplier’s Powerpoint slides. They are unlikely to spot the assumptions that pervade the formalised legal language.

During such a pre-contract exercise, the most sceptical councillors are often excluded from internal scrutiny, and the disinterested ones who are admitted into the inner chamber can find their heads swimming in a supplier-inspired language that either swathes uncertainty in the business jargon of near certainty or obscures reality in opaque legalese.

How are these lay councillors to get at the truth? Do they have the time?

Big outsourcing deals between councils and suppliers are inherently flawed, as this Somerset report indicates. Too many such deals have ended badly for council taxpayers as Dexter Whitfield’s investigations have shown.

But still some councils sign huge outsourcing deals. Their leading officials and councillors say they took lessons from failed contracts around the country into account. But what does that mean? If a deal is inherently flawed, perhaps because of diverging incentives, it is inherently flawed.

The disaster that is Southwest One could be a priceless jewel in the public sector’s display case if it serves to deter councillors and officials signing further large-scale council outsourcing deals.

http://ukcampaign4change.com/

When you click on the link to Dexter Whitfield’s investigations, you get this interesting comment:

The number of PPP strategic partnerships has increased 35% in just two years with 18 additional contracts valued at £8bn. 60 contracts are currently operating, four were terminated and one completed the contract term, but was not renewed. A further two are being terminated in 2014. Strategic partnerships originated in ICT and corporate services, but have extended into planning, education, police, fire and rescue and property services. The failure rate is very high – nearly 1 in 4 contracts are either terminated, reduce scope as services are brought back in-house, and/or suffer major financial and operational problems. Savings, new business and new jobs targets continue to be illusive.


Left hand and right hand out of sync again – this time on community hospitals

.…. The NHS chief executive will outline new models of care amid warnings of critical shortages of family doctors and fears that the NHS could not cope with a bad winter.  Mr Stevens will suggest that GP practices could open in hospitals, especially in urban areas, where doctors are spread too thinly between a number of traditional local practices.  In other areas, family doctors could band together to run expanded community hospitals, employing hospital consultants and other staff and offering extra services, such as scans, outpatient chemotherapy and dialysis.

The plan follows indications earlier this year that Mr Stevens wants to see a bigger role for “cottage”, community and local district general hospitals.

He will say that there will be no national blueprint, but that towns, cities and rural communities should find models which work for their populations, and ensure services work around the patient.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/11137640/Hospitals-to-set-up-GP-practices-and-keep-the-old-out-of-AandE.html

Today Manchester, tomorrow “Greater Exeter” or “Devon wide”? Maybe Councillor Potter is right and there will be no district councils soon

The Greater Manchester Combined Authority – made up of a consortium of 10 local authorities is going back to the drawing board and attempting to draw up a Regional Spatial Strategy – i.e. a Mega-Local-Plan. Those long in the tooth (i.e. who remember local government more than 4 years ago) will recall that this used to be the way things were done for infrastructure and investment wit the (not-much-missed-because-it-wasn’t-very-good) South West Regional Development Agency SWRDA with their Spatial Strategy for the whole of Devon. They were replaced by Local Enterprise Partnership – but they, too, seem to be fading away gradually as we hear less of them and their funding.

http://www.agma.gov.uk/what_we_do/manchester-family-centre-of-excellence/index.html

(what an odd URL!)

So, maybe this is the way things are going – fewer and fewer small authorities and more and more amalgamation as Councillor Potter predicted at Newton Poppleford earlier this week.

But where does that leave EDDC? They fought Devon-wide unitisation so, so hard a few years ago – spending at least a quarter of a million pounds of our council tax on persuading us not to go down that route and saying how bad it was for us. Then, as soon as the new government came in, they cancelled unitisation saying it was not a good idea. Now amalgamation seems to be the new theory and it’s all ok now.

There must be some really hard head-scratching going on at present at EDDC as they see the possibiity of losing control! Though there are many who think they lost control some time ago ….

… and wouldn’t the Skypark HQ make a lovely Devon HQ so that Exeter and DCC could sell off their current offices for housing ….. unless it goes to Plymouth, of course! Why not: it’s on the far edge of the area and only as far (relatively speaking) from Exeter in Devon-wide terms as Axminster is from Skypark in EDDC terms!

Another chalk and cheese IT partnership

Plymouth City Council is now joining its IT services with the NHS Devon-wide groupings.

Originally they had planned to join up with EDDC and Teignbridge (not sure about Exeter)

Question: why did Plymouth pull out of the council-wide partnership and
Question: what synergy is there between council and NHS IT systems (given the national health service IT fiasco in the last few years.

Can all these partnerships REALLY save money?

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/City-council-NHS-set-new-private-company/story-23026190-detail/story.html

Where do (will) Cranbrook residents go for hospital community care?

With no GP surgery they are said to be currently registering with Exeter city GPs – are they using Exeter-based health care professionals and maybe Exeter-based services too?

If Exeter at any time refuses to offer community care for people not in the geographical city boundary (which may happen when cash is tight), where will Cranbrook residents get their care?