“Election officers urge “root and branch” review of electoral system”

We know all about election problems in East Devon! Indeed our Returning Officer and CEO Mark Williams was called to Parliament to explain our omnishambles when 6,000 voters disappeared from the electoral roll in the year before general and local elections.

And an interesting point made on the declarations of electoral administration expenses.

“Election officers were “pushed to the absolute limit” by this year’s glut of polls, the Association of Electoral Administrators has said in a report.

This covered the period of local elections last May and the referendum on European Union membership in June, both conducted on new registers under the individual electoral registration system.

The report said election administrators would recall 2016 “as the year that the system came closer to collapse than ever before”.

The combination of May and June polls left administrators “stretched beyond belief” as they struggled to run multiple local polls and the referendum back to back, the AEA said.

This was complicated by the 48-hour extension to the registration deadline for the referendum.

The AEA warned that the system would be unable to cope with further burdens unless it were reformed.

Chief executive John Turner said: “What is required is a root and branch review of the whole arrangements for registration and the conduct of elections rather than more adjustment and change to a system so deeply rooted in the 19th century.

“Many of the problems that currently exist and which surfaced again at this year’s elections are because of the historic nature of the systems in place and which are increasingly becoming unfit for purpose.”

The AEA said the Government should implement the Law Commission’s
recommendations for a single Electoral Administration Act setting out the high-level framework governing electoral registration, elections and referendums in the UK, with the operational detail of registration, absent voting, and elections contained in secondary legislation.

It should also publish an assessment of the risks associated with any proposed changes to legislation before making any changes.

The Cabinet Office should ensure that administration expenses claims submitted are audited and settled within the same financial year, the AEA said.

It also called for staff to be exempt from auto-enrolment for pensions when they were working on elections and referendums, as opposed to their normal duties, to avoid creating a liability for election administrators.

The AEA sounded the alarm over the multiple polls due on 7 May 2020, when a UK Parliamentary general election, police and crime commissioner elections and those for numerous local authorities and elected mayors are due to coincide. It called on the Government to consider changing the date of some of the polls involved.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=28433%3Aelection-officers-urge-root-and-branch-review-of-electoral-system&catid=59&Itemid=27

Grass roots community action in Athens

“Navarinou Park – part playground, part open-air cinema, part vegetable garden and verdant oasis – was never meant to be. On that, all of its participants agree. Stavros Stavrides, a professor of architecture at Athens’ National Technical University, is the first to say it; so, too, do the local residents who, spade in hand, also worked to transform an unprepossessing parking lot on the rim of Athens’ edgy Exarcheia district into a vibrant community garden.

“Who’d have thought?” asks Effie Saroglou, a dancer, walking her dark-haired mutt around the park. “Who’d have imagined us ever sitting here?” says Yannis Mandris, a musician, watching a grainy rendition of Blade Runner in a makeshift arena on the other side of the lot. Something is stirring in the Greek capital – and in more ways than one Navarinou Park has come to represent it.

Stavrides calls it a movement, a new form of commons in which public-spirited individuals reclaim public space; others an informal urbanism born of a spirit of solidarity that has taken hold since Europe’s economic crisis erupted in Greece in 2009. For in Navarinou – a place run by neighbourhood committee – citizens have sought new ways of overcoming the trauma of economic collapse. And they have done so by creating a place where, self-contained and seemingly beyond the reach of authority, they can meet, converse, play and produce food.

Bereft of civic protection and the great umbrella of the welfare state, grassroots groups across Athens have followed suit. …

… “What we are witnessing is an explosion of social networks born of bottom-up initiatives,” says Stavrides, who was among the activists whose spontaneous efforts stopped [a parking lot] being turned into a parking space in late 2009. “Navarinou heralded this new culture, this new spirit of people taking their lives into their own hands. They know that they can no longer expect the state to support them and through this process, they are discovering how important it is to share.”

“Increasingly, local associations, resident committees and solidarity groups are forging ties, exchanging know-how, giving shape to new concepts of co-existence, and in so doing, reshaping public space.

“The crisis has made a lot of Greeks want to work together,” says Lydia Carras, who oversees the long-established Elliniki Etairia Society for the Environment and Cultural Heritage from a building at the foot of the Acropolis. “There is a new mood of cooperation because people understand that the only way to get their voice heard is to make alliances.”

http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/sep/21/athens-unofficial-community-hope-government-failures?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

“We need to talk about Devon”

Emeritus Martin Shaw joined Sussex as Professor of International Relations and Politics in 1995, and became Research Professor in 2008. He was head of department at Sussex from 1996-99. After graduating from the London School of Economics in Sociology, he held lecturerships in Sociology at Durham and Hull (from which he gained his PhD) and was Professor of Political and International Sociology at Hull. He currently holds a Professorial Fellowship at Roehampton University, London, and is a Visiting Professor at the Institut Barcelona d’Estudis Internacional.

Professor Shaw is currently a town councillor in Seaton, Devon.

“The Conservative hold on power in Britain is stronger than might be implied by its slim 17-seat majority in the 650-seat House of Commons. Labour, the only other party with a hope of forming an electoral majority, would need to gain around 100 seats even before the impact of the newly announced boundary changes is taken into account. Alternatively, it could settle for a coalition, and forge an agreement with the Scottish National Party; but this looks no more possible now than in 2015. As the Labour leadership contest draws to a close, the party’s road to power, whoever wins, is extremely difficult to forsee.

The Tory elective dictatorship rests on an almost complete dominance in southern England (outside large cities and university towns), which was also the principal area of support for Brexit. In the 2015 general election, the Tories’ targeted wipeout of the Liberal Democrats across the South West delivered their unexpected majority. South and west of Bristol there is only one non-Tory MP (Labour’s Ben Bradshaw in Exeter). Even more than in the much-discussed case of Scotland under the SNP, the South West has become a virtual one-party state.

Some outside the region have speculated that a Liberal Democrat recovery might help enable a ‘progressive alliance’ to form as an alternative to Theresa May’s Tories. However, a recovery to pre-2015 levels would not only be insufficient to offset Labour’s deficits in Scotland as elsewhere, it also ignores the extent to which the Tories have concentrated power to make it difficult for any opposition party to change the regional balance.The situation in the region’s largest county, Devon, shows the depth of the problem. But at the same time, it is where local activists are devising new ways of doing politics that are challenging Tory control.

A microcosm of Tory power
The Tory monopoly in Devon is even more complete than in neighbouring Cornwall and Somerset. Conservatives have overwhelming control of local government (both unitary authorities, the County Council and almost all the districts). In the urban areas, the general election results were close, and opposition parties remain in contention. Labour has strong representation in Plymouth, as well as Exeter where they recently consolidated their control of the City Council, and the Lib Dems enjoy considerable support in Torbay. But in the rural areas and small towns, the majority of the county, Tory dominance is almost absolute at every level – barring some town and parish councils where politics is less partisan.

Some rural areas have never had a non-Tory MP. The Tories had six of the seven non-urban Devon seats even in 2010. At least one council, East Devon, has been Tory since it was created in 1973. In semi-rural Devon, even an unlikely Lib Dem revival would make little difference. How then can things ever change?

Minority rule
It is important to understand that Conservative rule is based neither on majority support or extensive party membership. In 2015, the party gained under 45 per cent of all votes. Even in the seven non-urban seats, the 2015 increase in Tory support brought them only up to a 49 per cent average; in the urban seats they squeaked in on the same 37 per cent that gave them their national majority. Yet the non-Conservative majority are virtually unrepresented.

The Tory party is hollowed out and probably has far fewer members than Labour. The party could only take Torbay and North Devon from the Lib Dems with the aid of the notorious ‘battle bus’ activists, whose costs their Torbay agent, Alison Hernandez – like many others – failed to declare. Even after Channel 4 broke the scandal in 2016, Hernandez was narrowly elected as Devon and Cornwall Police and Crime Commissioner, but refused to stand aside as she was investigated (the case was transferred to another force and is still pending).

As ever where one-party rule is so entrenched, corruption is not far away. Revelations like those in 2013, when East Devon Tory councillor Graham Brown was forced to resign after telling a journalist he could obtain planning permission in return for cash, fuel widespread cynicism about local power which make the ruling party vulnerable.The flexibility of local Tory MPs over Brexit is likely to create a new constituency for opposition; ‘pro-Remain’ Neil Parish MP, Chair of the parliamentary Environment committee, quickly backed Boris Johnson and Andrea Leadsom in quick succession for the leadership and now describes Brexit as a ‘glorious opportunity’.

Failure of the opposition parties
That non-Tory votes largely fail to make an impact is partly the repsonsibility of previous Labour and Lib Dem politicians. They have repeatedly failed to reform the electoral system, both at the national and local level. Tony Blair’s government never held the referendum on Proportional Representation to which its 1997 manifesto committed it. Current Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, has never campaigned for PR during his 33 years in Parliament, and together with his rival Owen Smith continues to fudge the issue in recent responses to the Electoral Reform Society.

Nick Clegg abandoned the Lib Dems’ longstanding committment to proportional representation to obtain office in 2010, settling for the promise of a referendum on the weaker ‘alternative vote’ system without even securing government support for change. In the South West, the Lib Dems’ collective political suicide through the Coalition has broken the residual credibility of the first-past-the-post system.

Failing services
Because Tory dominance is so extensive, the party has largely taken voters for granted. Devon is suffering sharply from the general underfunding, balkanisation and creeping part-privatisation of public services. The NHS trust running the flagship Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital has been forced from a healthy surplus into deep deficit. The NEW Devon Clinical Commissioning Group, also in chronic deficit, tried to bar some patients from routine operations until obliged by public pressure to abandon its plans. Local Community Hospitals have lost beds and have been handed over to NHS Property Services, which can put up rents or, worse, sell off the sites.

Devon is a region of heavy immigration, mainly of retirees from other English regions (although with some international migrants, concentrated in its cities). As in the NHS, the gap between funding and need threatens adult social care. Child protection services are deemed inadequate. Since Tory Devon retains grammar schools, there are concerns about the effects of Theresa May’s proposed expansion of these schools on the excluded majority of children.

Phoney devolution
The unaccountability of Devon Tories is also evident in how they have embraced the half-baked, patchwork ‘devolution’ launched by George Osborne, which offers limited ‘additional’ money – while core government funding for local services is pared down or eliminated. Although Devon is a much larger and more populous county than neighbouring Cornwall which has a sole devolution deal, Devon is being forced into a merger with Somerset in a new brand, an affront to local identities, ‘Heart of the South West’.

The principal rationale for the linkage seems to be to create a larger base for the anachronistic and hyper-expensive Hinckley C nuclear project. Any benefits, if they materialise, will be overwhelmingly for the neighbouring county. The proposed devolution, with a hyper-aspirational prospectus which bears comparison to Vote Leave’s notorious offer, is being run through the Local Economic Partnership, dominated by unelected business leaders.

The county election challenge
Devon County Council comes up for reelection in May 2017. In 2013, the Tories won 38 of the 62 seats on a mere 35 per cent of the vote. Under first past the post, the divided Lib Dems, Labour, Greens and Independents between them won only 20 seats for 41 per cent of the vote. (UKIP, which polled 23 per cent, won 4 seats.) It is obvious that none of the three centre and left opposition parties can win a majority in 2017. The Lib Dems may keep some strongholds, but they are still picking themselves up from their 2015 battering, and elsewhere local activists are thin on the ground.

Despite a deep conflict between Bradshaw and pro-Corbyn Momentum activists, Labour will probably keep its Exeter seats, but is unlikely to win in the rural areas and small towns. Rural Labour parties have seen the Corbyn surge in membership but with modest benefits for local activism: a constituency party which has trebled its membership to 500 may still only get about 15 people to its meetings. Members vote for their preferred leader, but have too little scope to change things locally. Even if it advances, Labour is starting from a very low base, and the Greens are smaller.

New politics?
The 2015 elections saw important steps forward for a different kind of politics in semi-rural East Devon. From a standing start, Independent candidate Claire Wright leapfrogged UKIP, Labour and the Lib Dems to take second place in the East Devon parliamentary constituency of Hugo Swire, a ‘Cameron croney’ since knighted in his resignation honours. It was the only Independent second place anywhere in England, after a grassroots campaign typically ignored by the national press.

In parallel, the East Devon Alliance, formed in 2013 out of revulsion at the Brown case and East Devon’s pro-developer bias, put up over 30 district council candidates and succeeded, despite the simultaneous Tory general election victory, in taking ten seats from the Tories (this writer was an unsuccessful candidate). Independents led by EDA replaced the Lib Dems as the official opposition.

An investigative blog, East Devon Watch, has played an important informational role in the new politics, now matched by a South Devon Watch site. An Independent group successfully challenged for control of Buckfastleigh Town Council, in the Teinbridge district, at the same time as the better-known ‘flatpack democracy’ of Frome in Somerset. A loose Independent network is emerging across the South West, including Cornwall.

Although social media played an important part in these campaigns, many relied heavily on old-fashioned doorstep campaigning. A new campaign to influence the County Council elections, Devon United, is perhaps the first – certainly the most ambitious – initiative to be actually launched through social media. Its first meeting in October will be addressed by Paul Hilder, co-founder of OpenDemocracy.net and CrowdPac and former global campaigns director for Avaaz and Change.org.

I have written recently about the limitations of the national progressive crowdsourcing campaign organisation, 38 Degrees, during and after the Brexit vote. It remains to be seen what happens when crowdsourced politics meets local electioneering, and how the division of the anti-Tory vote will be overcome. But this initiative shows that the new politics is alive and kicking in a county where the old politics has so manifestly failed.”

https://www.opendemocracy.net/uk/martin-shaw/we-need-to-talk-about-devon

(At least) 600 hospital beds to go in Devon – 72 of them in East Devon

Hospital being pitted against hospital (e.g. Sidmouthor Seaton to close)

“… the body which runs health services in most of Devon said that it was now looking at proposals to cut 72 beds in community hospitals in the east of the county.”

The four options under consultation are…

A) 32 beds in Tiverton, 24 beds in Seaton and 16 beds in Exmouth.

B) 32 beds in Tiverton, 24 beds in Sidmouth and 16 beds in Exmouth.

C) 32 beds in Tiverton, 24 beds in Seaton and 16 beds in Whipton.

D) 32 beds in Tiverton, 24 in Sidmouth and 16 beds in Whipton.

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/600-hospital-beds-to-be-axed-in-devon/story-29739152-detail/story.html

To repeat: the NHS is NOT overspent, it is underfunded

Outdoor exercise worth £2.2 billion to health

Outdoor exercise delivers an estimated £2.2bn of health benefits to adults in England each year, a study suggests.

Scientists calculated that more than eight million people each week took at least 30 minutes of “green exercise”.

They hope the results highlight how encouraging more people to use parks will help reverse the trend of rising obesity levels across the UK.
The findings have been presented in the journal Preventative Medicine.
“What we look at here is something that can be converted relatively simply into monetary values,” explained lead author Mathew White from the European Centre for Environment and Human Health at the University of Exeter. …

… The study estimated that it was worth an average of £2.2bn each year. Dr White said that there had been relatively few attempts to place a monetary estimate on the societal benefits from green exercise.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-37403915

Unfortunately, the land on which the exercise takes place is worth MUCH more to developers.

RIP Devon NHS – Conservatives get special advance briefing

“A ‘confidential’ briefing to Conservatives on Devon County Council confirms community hospital beds across the county will be cut and patients will not be admitted for treatment and care ‘unless it is absolutely necessary’.

The NHS has planned a series of carefully orchestrated announcements tomorrow (Wednesday 21st) but it has now been revealed that Devon’s Conservative councillors had a confidential email last week telling them about some of the planned cuts.

It’s angered other councillors who are demanding to know why confidential information was given to the Conservatives on Thursday last week (15th).

Cllr Alan Connett, Shadow leader of Devon County Council and leader of the Liberal Democrat opposition, said: “The NHS belongs to everyone. We are all concerned about what the new plans will mean and how treatment will be affected for residents.

“Yet again, we find the Conservatives at County Hall think the rules don’t apply to them. Isn’t it hugely arrogant of them to slip out a secret briefing in the early hours of Thursday to their own councillors a full week before NHS managers announce their plans publicly.

“It’s another Conservative shambles and will greatly undermine any confidence we can have in them or the NHS which, presumably has been telling county hall chiefs what’s in the cuts pipeline.

Across Devon, people may well be wondering if some grubby private deal has been stitched up between NHS bosses and county hall Conservatives over these planned cuts.”

In a confidential email to just Tory councillors, Conservative Stuart Barker, cabinet member at county hall for health and adult social care, said: “There are some consultation documents going out from the NHS which are likely to have an effect on the budget for adult social care.

“I am sending you a synopsis of some things that are in the consultation documents and included some information about how DCC (Devon County Council) could be impacted.

“We shall be working with NHS partners to ensure DCC has a share of any savings that can be found.”

And Cllr Barker goes on to tell his Tory colleagues: ” The NHS believe that there are too many people in community hospital beds across Devon, who don’t need to be there.

“Every day, in NEW Devon, there are 150 people in community hospital beds that could be cared for at home. In addition, of the current 247 community inpatient beds across the NEW Devon CCG (clinical commissioning group) footprint approximately 100 beds are unused.

Cllr Connett added: “We can see what’s planned, can’t we? The NHS is reported as saying they don’t need the 150 beds now being used and, by strange co-incidence, there are 100 beds not being used at all. Magically, the two come to around 250 – the same number of community hospital beds the NHS want to close.

“I’m as keen as everyone else to hear what the NHS plans are for health cuts across Devon, but I think it is totally wrong for the Conservatives to sneak out a private briefing just for their councillors, which will undermine the whole public consultation process the NHS is about to launch.”

http://www.theprsd.co.uk/2016/09/20/confidential-briefing-confirms-nhs-community-hospital-beds-close/

Will Swire be absent from East Devon in November?

““Clarence House has announced that Charles and Camilla will visit the Middle East on an official royal tour in November. The couple last travelled to the region together in March 2013.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3798085/Charles-Camilla-return-Middle-East-official-royal-visit-Bahrain-Oman-United-Arab-Emirates-November.html

Can’t imagine that the Chairman of the Conservative Middle East Council (Hugo Swire) will be able to keep away from that jaunt.

It must be almost like being back in the Foreign Office. So much to do (sell?) in the Middle East, so much less time for East Devon.

May and devolution

“In a lengthy article in the Manchester Evening News, the prime minister said she was “absolutely committed” to devolving powers away from Westminster.

She said: “I don’t want to see our country dependent on one city any more. I want to get all of our great cities firing on all cylinders to rebalance our economy.”

Right – according to this model, ditch the LEP and have two “economic powerhouses” based on Plymouth and Exeter! (It is already happening secretly behind the usual closed doors – more on that soon).

Somerset? It doesn’t have a city, so let their city be Hinkley C!

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/sep/20/theresa-may-confirms-commitment-northern-powerhouse-george-osborne

Report: “Getting ready for ageing”

“… Stop seeing ageing as being about older people: Ageing is about all of us. It isn’t about young versus old. We will fail to tackle the challenges and make the most of the opportunities of ageing whilst we pitch one generation against another.

Stop ignoring the demands and needs of an ageing population: In Government there is not and never has been a Minister, senior social or other post holder such as a ‘Commissioner’ or ‘Tsar’, or any cross cutting unit or Government strategy on an ageing society.

Stop delivering communities which fail to deliver beyond the basics: Sadly, many communities are even failing to provide the basics of public toilets and places to rest. A fear of falling and of crime acts as a barrier to getting out and about for many older people. We must deliver a more ambitious vision for our communities: of places which are fun and engaging for all ages, whilst also reducing the risk of isolation and loneliness.

End the discrimination: Age discrimination remains a barrier to the participation of older people in society. Legislation has gone some way to prevent discrimination but policymakers must ensure that older people are not prevented from accessing products and services simply because of their age. We all need to play a part in normalising ageing.

Reverse the decline in new and appropriate housing stock for older people: The numbers of new retirement homes being built are being allowed to fall at the same time as the numbers of older people are rapidly increasing. Too few new homes are being built. Those which are, are too often not accessible or adaptable for old age.

Stop ignoring the crisis in social care: Government investment in social care is sharply shrinking while the numbers of older people who need it are rising, yet good social care saves public money by reducing and postponing older people’s need for expensive acute hospital care and helps them to live independently for longer. Good social care for older people also allows family members to keep in employment – so they are not forced to choose between work and caring for an older relative.

Stop operating hospitals on a model designed for the past: Hospitals of the 21st Century are increasingly made up of older patients with complex needs. Sta ratios on hospital wards dedicated to older people, many of them with dementia, are typically lower than those in general wards. Yet we know that these older people often have greater need of help with essentials like eating and drinking.

Stop under-utilising older people: The over 65s in the UK currently spend around £2.2 billion per week (£114 billion per annum) on goods and services. Assuming the spending of the 65+ population rises in line with annual in ation of 2%, their spending will reach over £6 billion per week by 20377. People aged 65 and over in the UK last year contributed £61bn to the economy through employment, informal caring and volunteering. Yet almost four in ten workers aged 55-64 are not working. And almost half of the unemployed of this age range are in long term unemployment. We must do more to maximise the social and economic contribution of older people.” …

http://www.cpa.org.uk/cpa/docs/Ready_for_Ageing_Alliance_Manifesto.pdf

The myth of local health consultations and “choices”

Our local health services are NOT overspent, they are underfunded.

We are NOT having to make “difficult choices” – we are being told what has been decided for us behind closed doors about the consequences of that underfunding.

“Public consultation” is far too little far too late. The decisions were made long ago about which services will suffer and we cannot reverse those decisions without a MASSIVE revolt against them, and even then concessions will be zero or minimal.

That is the reality.

If we want to change that most of us will have to vote out the people who brought us to this. Unpalatable for some, but the only course available to us.

AONB annual forum – places still available

“Spaces are still available for the East Devon Area of Natural Beauty Partnership annual forum

The evening will feature talks from Mike Ruiter of Seaton Jurassic and John Sheaves, chief executive of Taste of the West. The winner of the Ackland Award will also be announced.

The forum will begin at 6pm on

Wednesday, September 28, at Seaton Jurassic.

Guests who book quickly will be able to enjoy a pre-event tour around the attraction’s new interpretation centre at 5pm.

Numbers are limited. To book, email info@eastdevonaonb.org.uk or call 01404 46663. Book by Friday, September 23, to avoid disappointment.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/spaces_available_at_annual_aonb_forum_1_4698235

Hurry, hurry, hurry – while we still have an AONB to talk about.

“Swire Oilfield Services”

Coincidence?

““Swire Oilfield Services, part of the worldwide Swire Group, is the world’s largest supplier of specialist offshore cargo carrying units to the global energy industry and is a leading specialist in modular systems, offshore aviation services and chemical handling.

Swire Oilfield Services can provide standard, specialised and bespoke products certified to DNV2-7.1 and EN12079 to the worldwide oil and gas market. With an extensive hire fleet it allows immediate access, 24 hours a day, to a comprehensive range of products anywhere in the world.”

http://www.swireos.com

Perhaps Mr Swire can assure us that he has no direct or indirect links with the company?

Perhaps get some advance payment on Hinkley C from the Chinese ….

“China has failed to curb excesses in its credit system and faces mounting risks of a full-blown banking crisis, according to early warning indicators released by the world’s top financial watchdog.

A key gauge of credit vulnerability is now three times over the danger threshold and has continued to deteriorate, despite pledges by Chinese premier Li Keqiang to wean the economy off debt-driven growth before it is too late.

The Bank for International Settlements warned in its quarterly report that China’s “credit to GDP gap” has reached 30.1, the highest to date and in a different league altogether from any other major country tracked by the institution. It is also significantly higher than the scores in East Asia’s speculative boom on 1997 or in the US subprime bubble before the Lehman crisis.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/09/18/bis-flashes-red-alert-for-a-banking-crisis-in-china/

More on Swire’s Conservative Middle East Council’s big donor

The largest donor to the Conservative Middle East Council, of which Hugo Swire has just become Chairman, is said to be a gentleman by the name of David Rowland.

Here is a Guardian article from 2010 on him:

“A multimillionaire property tycoon who persuaded Prince Andrew to unveil a bronze statue of him at his palatial home in Guernsey might not be considered a shy man. But David Rowland, the Tory donor who was due to take up the post of treasurer of the Conservative party within six weeks, has led a remarkably guarded life.

Notoriously camera shy, Rowland is said to have refused to give the Conservatives a photograph of himself. The only publicly available image of Rowland, a man whose business interests have spanned the globe, is a black and white photograph of him smoking a cigar, printed in the Observer in 1971.

The story was about his return from Paris, where the 25-year-old had gone into tax exile after selling his interests in Fordham Investment Group for £2.4m. The accompanying description of a “wheeler dealer extraordinaire” with a penchant for fat cigars is one that would not seem out of place almost four decades on.

Rowland, along with his son, is now estimated to be worth more than £730m, a sum that makes them jointly the 25th richest people in the country. He was also set to become one of the country’s most politically influential figures, as fundraiser-in-chief for the Tories.

The announcement by Conservative party central office that Rowland would not be taking the post due to his “developing business interests” capped a tumultuous summer for the property developer who, soon after the Tories announced that he would take over as their treasurer, became the subject of a string of stories in the Daily Mail that sought to paint his business dealings and personal life in a controversial light.

The son of a London scrap-metal dealer, Rowland is said to have left school without a single O-level. Aged 15, he was convicted of petty larceny at Wimbledon juvenile court, having stolen goods worth £2. That sum would soon pale into insignificance for Rowland, who within five years had turned his life around, bought a house and become a millionaire.

By his early 20s he was renowned for his business acumen and fierce approach to takeovers, later acquiring a business empire that, in the 70s and 80s, expanded into Europe and the United States.

As well as living abroad to avoid tax in the UK, Rowland reportedly used tax havens such as the Bahamas, Panama, Luxembourg and the British Virgin Islands for his business dealings.

The property tycoon has occasionally found himself in controversy.

One such occasion came in the late 80s, when Rowland participated in an attempt to take over Hibernian, one of Scotland’s top football clubs. The deal fell, however, incurring the wrath of the local MP, who tabled a motion in the House of Commons denouncing Rowland and David Duff, the lawyer he was apparently financing.

The motion accused the pair of involving the Edinburgh club in loss-making dealings, called for an inquiry into “recent wheeling and dealing”, and described Rowland as a “shady financier”.

Another noteworthy aspect of Rowland’s life has been his friendship with the Duke of York, which has dated back several years. Prince Andrew unveiled a life-size bronze statue of Rowland – reportedly showing him smoking a cigar in “vaguely Churchillian pose” – in the grounds of Havilland Hall, the largest privately owned estate on Guernsey, in 2005.

More recently Rowland appears to have decided to forsake his privacy and take an active role in British party politics. Electoral law prevents foreign donations, and last year Rowland returned to his native country from decades of tax exile, relocating to Mayfair, which enabled him to make a string of large gifts to the Tories.

Rumoured to have paid £20,000 for a portrait of the prime minister, David Cameron, at a Tory fundraising auction, his conversion to the Conservative party’s cause seems to have been absolute.

In a little more than a year he donated almost £2.8m, making him the Tories’ largest benefactor. Exactly why a man who had not shown much interest in the party for at least a decade became an enthusiastic supporter remains a mystery.

He started with a sum of £1m in June last year, and continued to give as the general election drew nearer. By June this year, Cameron had appointed him to be his party treasurer. Rowland pronounced it a “tremendous honour”.

That appointment, however, may have placed him on a collision course with the Conservative party’s better-known benefactor, Michael Ashcroft.

In the time Rowland donated more than £1m to the Tory party, Lord Ashcroft, through his corporate vehicle, Bearwood Corporate Services, donated around £100,000, although his support of the party dates back far earlier. Rowland’s sudden promotion is also said to have irked a number of senior Tories.

Not long after Cameron unveiled his new treasurer, a series of critical articles appeared in the Daily Mail. Many appeared to focus on Rowland’s private life, and delved into marital issues dating back decades.

A more serious accusation concerned pollution from a lead smelting plant in Idaho, America, alleged to be one of the country’s worst industrial pollution scandals. The pollution was said to have caused acute respiratory health problems among local children.

Rowland was not connected to the plant when the pollution occurred in the 1970s. His property company bought Gulf Resources, which owned the plant, more than a decade later, in 1989.

Rowland and others were accused of diverting company assets which should have been used to clean up the contamination. It is alleged that the money was used instead in a property deal in New Zealand. He and other directors were also accused of transferring company assets overseas when they should have been used to pay for the health insurance of former employees.

According to a lawsuit in the US in 1997, Rowland and other directors were accused of engaging “in a course of conduct designed to loot and waste the assets of the company”. It was alleged that “the defendants entered into a series of transactions by which they transferred Gulf assets into their control”.

It was also claimed that when concerns were raised, Rowland gave assurances that Gulf would “meet its obligations for employee benefits and environmental clean-up, assurances alleged to be false and fraudulent”.

Rowland has called the court allegations “unsubstantiated and false”. He has been quoted as saying: “There were multiple defendants in the case and it is customary in such American cases for extreme claims to be made.

“No evidence was submitted in support of these false claims. The case was settled with no payment being made by David Rowland nor by any company connected with him nor by any other associates of his.”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/aug/20/david-rowland-controversy-conservatives?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

And just who is sponsoring Swire’s new outfit? Is this what YOU voted for?

So, how does the Conservative Middle East Council (Chairman Hugo Swire) get its money?

“British and Arab businessmen with strong commercial interests in Saudi Arabia are key funders of the Conservative Middle East Council, a Westminster body which has become increasingly vocal in its calls for Britain to stand by the House of Saud, despite the latter’s human rights abuses and possible war crimes in Yemen.

An investigation has revealed how the group has raised close to a million pounds since 2007, using the money to lobby for a stronger relationship with Saudi Arabia, as well as arrange delegations to other parts of the Arab world.” …

… an exclusive MEMO investigation has revealed that nearly all of the CMEC’s financial backers have strong business interests in Saudi Arabia and its smaller Gulf allies, ranging from defence to manufacturing to energy resources. This suggests that the support by the CMEC for an unconditional relationship with Saudi Arabia could be driven by donor preferences, something that is denied by officials. …

… By far the most generous current backer of the Conservative Middle East Council, according to Electoral Commission records, is David Rowland, a controversial British business tycoon, political financier and Monaco tax exile. Rowland has been involved closely in helping to secure multi-billion pound defence deals between British firms and the Saudi Arabian government; he has given the CMEC nearly £350,000 since 2010. In 2011, Rowland offered his private jets to Prince Andrew for free, as the member of the British royal family visited Saudi Arabia to help secure deals for BAE Systems.

The investigation also revealed that in June 2015, Rosemary Said, the wife of Syrian-Saudi businessman Wafic Said, gave CMEC £20,000; back in 2008, the donation was much more substantial, at £100,000. Wafic Said, who was banned from making donations to Westminster political parties as he does not hold British citizenship, is reported to have played a key role as a “fixer” in arranging the controversial Al-Yamamah deals between BAE Systems and the Saudi Arabian government, using his extensive network of contacts within the kingdom. Records show that alongside channelling funds to the CMEC through his wife Rosemary, Wafic’s son Khalid, has also given £12,500 to the organisation. …

… Energy boss Abdul Majid Jafar is also a donor to the CMEC, giving the group £15,000 in January 2014. His company, Crescent Petroleum, is the oldest of its type in the Middle East, and has extensive interests in the UAE, Bahrain and Iraq, with a smaller footprint in Saudi Arabia.

The investigation has also revealed that a construction firm called International Hospitals Group has donated £40,000 to the CMEC in the past two years. The company has secured several multi-million pound contracts with the government of Saudi Arabia, and received as a result “various letters of acknowledgement [i.e. references]… from senior Royal Princes” within the House of Saud, with which the company enjoys a strong business relationship.

A former funder of the lobby group is Pierre Rolin, a financier who previously provided investment management services to a $1bn American property empire owned by Prince Abdul Aziz Bin Fahd, a prominent royal in the House of Saud. Details of the extent of this portfolio were revealed in 2012 by investigative journalist Seth Hettena. However, Rolin stopped donating to the CMEC in 2009, and shortly afterwards it was revealed that his financial advisory business to the Saudi prince had collapsed.

The MEMO investigation also showed that the CMEC received an £18,000 donation from the London-based PR firm Bell Pottinger, which has represented Saudi Arabia in a public affairs and advocacy role. Its other clients have included the Bahrain government; the company declined to comment when contacted by MEMO, although a spokesperson for the CMEC said that the donation had been made because Bell Pottinger “supported the aims of the organisation at the time.”

The Director of the Conservative Middle East Council, Leo Docherty, told MEMO that donations (and thus donors) had not influenced decision-making within the group. “No donor has given us conditions,” he insisted, “but any big business person in the Middle East has strong interests in Saudi Arabia. We see ourselves as making the case for a constructive relationship, but we acknowledge it’s not perfect.”

The CMEC head claimed that a “huge amount of pressure” was being put on the Gulf States to reform. “Anyone who has a long-standing business relationship with the Gulf States, their job is to support these reforming tendencies,” he added.

Revealed: The Gulf business tycoons backing the Conservative Middle East Council

We won’t be seeing much of Swire in East Devon (what’s new!)

“The Conservative Middle East Council [of which Swire was elected Chairman last week] or CMEC is an organisation which exists to ensure that Conservative MPs and Peers understand the Middle East.

CMEC achieves this through a number of activities. Firstly, it organises delegations of Conservative MPs and Peers to the region. Delegations have visited Israel and the Palestinian Territories, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Lebanon and Tunisia.

CMEC also organises a number of events in the UK. These include talks by experts in the Houses of Parliament, receptions and lectures.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_Middle_East_Council

Councillor Claire Wright’s objection to Sidford Business Park

“12 acre industrial site proposed for Sidford – my objection

A planning application for a 12 acre business park in an area of outstanding natural beauty in Sidford has caused huge controversy.

The proposal first emerged when I was a local plan panel member in 2012. It suddenly appeared in the papers for our final meeting in the March. The proposal caused such uproar that it spawned the birth of Save Our Sidmouth, which ploughed much funding into fighting the allocation of this land in EDDC’s Local Plan.

Things looked up for a while after a full council meeting last year saw Stuart Hughes and Graham Troman manage to overturn the decision to allocate this land.

However, the planning inspector had other ideas and late last year, reinserted the contested piece of land back into the Local Plan.A planning application was submitted by Fords earlier this year.

Last Monday evening (12 September) I attended a public meeting at Sidford Village Hall where the application was discussed. The hall was absolutely packed with angry residents who wanted the plans thrown out. There was talk of a boycott of Fords to express the deep unhappiness with a local business who wants to build an industrial estate in sensitive countryside adjacent to houses. The meeting concluded that residents would fight the application tooth and nail.

I am familiar with the proposal as a former Local Plan panel member, however, it was a very useful meeting where I heard first hand from residents exactly how the application might have an impact on their communities.

I have now submitted an objection, which is below.

Highways The road through Sidbury is narrow, congested with parked cars and already experiences very high levels of traffic.

As Sidbury’s Devon County Councillor I have tried to address many complaints about the road, its narrowness, twistiness and the increasing level of traffic and heavy goods vehicles travelling through to the A30 at Honiton. Sidbury Primary School has a very difficult parking situation, with many parents having to park on the opposite side of the road and dash across with their children.

There are inadequate pavements around the school and any increase in traffic and HGVs could make things even more hazardous for parents and young children travelling to and from school. A school governor at the public meeting at Sidford Village Hall on 12 September, expressed huge concern about the increase in traffic and the impact it will have on parents and children at school pick up and drop off times.

I question the assumption in the developer’s highways report that only 20 per cent of traffic generated by the business park would travel through Sidbury, with the remaining 80 per cent opting to go via Sidford crossroads. I would have thought it was far more likely that a bigger percentage of the traffic would choose to travel to the nearest fast road – in this instance the A30 – via Sidbury. Much quicker than travelling to Exeter along the A3052.

I believe that the developers are vastly underestimating the impact of the traffic on Sidbury. There are many old listed properties which line the roads in Sidbury, which could be damaged by the increase in HGVs along this road. The NPPF states that a highways objection can be sustained if the traffic impact is severe. I agree with many Sidbury residents and local councillors, who believe that it would be. The application should be refused on highways grounds alone.

Landscape impacts

I agree with the AONB team and Natural England both of which assert that the proposed development would have a significant adverse affect on the setting of the AONB. The team also states that the current building plans, despite being in outline do not comply with NPPF policies relating to development in AONBs. It has the potential to set a precedent and so must be planned extremely carefully, which it is not. The landscape architect also believes that the scheme would have significant adverse impacts on the surrounding sensitive countryside, with information on design missing from the application. The landscape architect concludes that the application is unacceptable on landscape grounds.

Natural England recommends “substantial revision” on the grounds of visual intrusion. I believe that the application should be refused on landscape grounds and poor design within an AONB.

The cycleway from Sidbury to Sidford

As the Devon County councillor for Sidbury this cycleway is a significant project that I am anxious to finalise. Progress has been slow mainly due to matters outside Devon County Council’s control. I note the AONB team’s comments relating to the proposed cycleway as being disjointed, fully exposed to the road with the rural character of the route being removed.

The AONB team observe: “If approved, it would be completely at odds with the principle of providing an integrated and well connected and accessible development not to include a fully linked route at the outset of the development. Without this, at present, the proposal will not fully “deliver cycle and footway improvements which should aid sustainable travel in the area, not just the business park”; furthermore it could not be regarded as a “highly permeable and appealing walking and cycling environment”.

The application should be refused on the grounds of not providing an acceptable cycle route.

Flooding

The Environment Agency advises that new more stringent guidelines as set out in climate change documentation should be used as a material planning consideration for this application.

Given that the fields are close to a major watercourse and the area is prone to regular flooding, I very much hope that EDDC will use these guidelines to assess the application. Devon County Council flood and coastal risk officer has also recommended refusal on the grounds of insufficient information relating to water run-off. The application should be refused on these grounds.

It is clear that the evidential comments from residents and key consultees can only leave EDDC with no option but to refuse the application. Pic. The area of outstanding natural beauty close to where the proposal is targeting.”

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/12_acre_industrial_site_proposed_for_sidford_my_objection

“East Devon continues to be one of most active districts in UK with 40 Neighbourhood Plans in production”

EDDC produced the above press release headline as spin:

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/news/2016/09/east-budleigh-with-bicton-neighbourhood-plan-undergoing-consultation/

Unfortunately, the truth is more likely that EDDC is so keen on its developers and developing anything and everything, that neighbourhoods are scrambling as fast as they can to protect what few green and pleasant places they still have left after the Local Plan hoovered most of them up, before developers get their sticky mitts on them!

Letter to Sidmouth Herald edited – do you agree?

The writer of this letter had one crucial sentence (the last one, in bold) taken out by Sidmouth Herald where it was recently published:

“In last Friday’s Sidmouth Herald a short letter I had submitted for the Opinion page was printed – but minus its final sentence, thus taking away its punch line.

The letter submitted said:- ”

The Chairman of the Sidmouth Town Council Planning Committee is reported as telling the Planning meeting considering the Sidford Business Park that “It’s in the Local Plan. We have to fight the details”.

It only remains in the Local Plan because the EDDC voted, on 26 March 2015, to remove it – but in apparent ignorance of the fact that, the plan having already been submitted to the Inspector, they needed to send him evidence to support their decision. None was sent!

It is now up to us to overcome this incompetence. We have to challenge not just the details but the whole principle of building a Business Park ( a fancy name for an Industrial Estate!) on this site and on this scale.”

THIS IS THE MISSING SENTENCE CUT BY SIDMOUTH HERALD:

The proposal is yet another toxic legacy of the late, but unlamented, East Devon Business Forum.

Do you agree with this censorship?

The planners came to our town

THE PLANNERS CAME TO OUR TOWN

The planners came to our town
To see what they could do
We’ll smack this place around a bit
Who cares about the view?
We’ll knock it down and mess it around
We’ll sound its final knell
We’ll rip the heart right out of the place
And the locals can go to Hell

Hands off, hands off
They must be on Cloud Nine
The planners they can stick their plan
Right where the sun don’t shine

The planners came to our town
To grab the Market Square
There’s nothing much of value
That ever happens there
The market’s so untidy
We can’t see why the fuss
We’ll make it nice and neat and clean
For boring people like us

Hands off, hands off
They must be on Cloud Nine
The planners they can stick their plan
Right where the sun don’t shine

I don’t care what the planners think
Their plan is plain absurd
Its up to every one of us
To give the loonies the bird
We’ll march, petition and protest
With signatures by the load
And if that doesn’t do the trick
We’ll sit down in the road

Hands off, hands off
They must be on Cloud Nine
The planners they can stick their plan
Right where the sun don’t shine

Composed for a Facebook page protesting about inappropriate development in Totnes by Sam Richards, but could be anywhere.