“Jeremy Hunt says Britain’s care time bomb is a ‘one of the biggest commercial opportunities’ for private firms”

Good luck junior doctors with a boss like this! And no doubt our LEP has many friends who will contact him,

“The top Tory made the eyebrow-raising claim – and suggested more people should be saving for their own care

Britain’s care time bomb is “one of the biggest commercial opportunities” for private firms, Jeremy Hunt has said.

The top Tory made the eyebrow-raising claim today as he was grilled by MPs on the influential Health Select Committee.

And he suggested more people should be saving for their own care, treating it like society treats pension pots.

It comes as care homes fear they will be left penniless by the costs of the National Living Wage – throwing services into the lurch.

Tory MP Maggie Throup asked if private firms, facing a cocktail of higher costs, an ageing population and stricter standards, could also be forced to bow out of providing care.

Yet Mr Hunt said although it was a “very concerning situation”, he expected “many” private firms would be willing to fill in – because they see the potential for profit.

He told the committee the government had already taken the National Living Wage into account when doing its sums.

But he added: “If there are people who are exiting the market because they don’t like the much greater scrutiny over standards of care, then that’s their choice – but I think it’s the right thing for us as a society.

“At the same time I would also say that in many parts of the world businesses, because many of these organisations are private businesses, are looking at the ageing population as one of the biggest commercial opportunities.

“Because this is an area that all of us are going to spend much more money on as time goes on, both for our own care and those of our loved ones.

“So it’s important not to take a short-sighted approach as to the opportunities in that market.

“This is a section of the economy going forward where were are going to be spending more and more money, both publicly and privately.”

The exchange comes weeks after care providers claimed homes could be forced to close because of a lack of funds.

Town halls are being allowed to raise council tax by 2% to help meet spiralling care costs for the elderly.

The government claims the move could raise £2bn extra a year by 2020 – but the Local Government Association said the boost in 2016-17 could be wiped out by the cost of the £7.20-an-hour National Living Wage.

Professor Martin Green, chief executive of Care England which represents care providers, said last month: “If you’re poor and you’re old in Britain, you’re in trouble now. The state cannot afford to take care of you anymore.

“Everyone seems to think the state will come to your rescue if you need help in old age, but they won’t anymore, because they won’t be able to afford it.

“It’s not so bad if you are 40 and have cancer as that is a health care issue but if you are 80 and have dementia that is a social care issue, and that is going to be big, big problem.”

In another exchange Mr Hunt revealed the Tories shelved plans for a £72,000 ‘care cap’ until at least 2020 because they failed to create a private insurance market to go with it.

The Health Secretary said the policy was “designed” to push life insurance firms to create policies to cover the cost up to £72,000.

But he said: “We saw no signs of that insurance market being developed so we need to rethink.”

Although he insisted the cap was still government policy he warned: “I think the long term funding over the next few decades of our own social care is something we need to give a lot more thought to as a society.

“I think we decided after the war that it was incredibly important for us to be a society where the norm was for people to save for their pensions.

“And then we make some provision for people who aren’t able to save as much as they perhaps need to.

“I think we need to go through that same process of thinking for social care costs, given that we’re all going to live for much longer and the final few years of our life are likely to need expensive social care.”

Mr Hunt faced two and a half hours of questioning today as chiefs resumed negotiations with junior doctors over his 7-day NHS contract.

He defended axing bursaries for student nurses and replace them with loans, saying: “This can be a very beneficial way of increasing the number of places and increasing the number of people from poorer backgrounds.”

And he claimed the NHS was already bringing down the bill for agency staff after it “exploded” from £2.5bn to £3.7bn in recent years.

In one tense exchange Mr Hunt was questioned repeatedly about his ‘flawed’ claims NHS patients are more likely to die on weekends.

SNP MP Dr Philippa Whitford blasted: “Is it not beholden on the Secretary of State to actually know what the problem is before spending billions to fix it?”

But he replied: “I’m not an academic but I think the mistake for a Health Secretary is to look at the overwhelming amount of evidence there is of a weekend effect and decide to get off the hook by disputing the methodology.”

http://nr.news-republic.com/Web/ArticleWeb.aspx?regionid=4&articleid=64029603

Police and Crime Panel Chair sees no problem for PCC to be in charge whilst under investigation

monkeys

Doesn’t see any conflict of interest. No plans to call a special meeting. All absolutely fine. Nothing to worry about, it’s only an allegation … Move on, nothing to see here … fuss over nothing …

Councillor Croad, Conservative Chair of the Panel on Spotlight this evening.

Wonder if the Chief Constable agrees?

Hinkley C: EDF works council demands independent report on project

“EDF’s works council said on Monday it had voted to order an external study into the French utility’s project to build two nuclear reactors at Hinkley Point in Britain.

The works council said it was missing key information and ordered the study to help it to prepare a recommendation about the 18 billion pound (23 billion euros) project.

EDF’s main unions want the company to delay the Hinkley Point project by three years, the time they say is needed to finish other nuclear projects in France and China.

The works council did not say when the study would be ready or when it expected to make its recommendation, which will not be binding on EDF.

EDF chief executive Jean-Bernard Levy said late last month that Hinkley Point would be launched once the works council had issued its recommendation.

Economy Minister Emmanuel Macron has said he expected a final investment decision in September.

EDF declined to comment.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/reuters/article-3581281/EDF-works-council-votes-independent-study-Hinkley-point.html

Barnet CEO and Returning Officer resigns after polling blunders

“The chief executive of Barnet Council has left his role after a blunder led to some voters being turned away from polling stations on Thursday.
Andrew Travers left the authority by “mutual agreement” after the error, officials said.

Voters were initially turned away from all 155 polling stations in the borough because their names were missing from the poll list.

An independent investigation has been launched, the council said.
In a statement issued through the council, Mr Travers said: “I have enjoyed my time at Barnet and I believe the changes we have put in place and the continued programme of growth and transformation will enable the borough to continue to thrive.”

The chief executive of Barnet Council has left his role after a blunder led to some voters being turned away from polling stations on Thursday.

Andrew Travers left the authority by “mutual agreement” after the error, officials said.

Voters were initially turned away from all 155 polling stations in the borough because their names were missing from the poll list.

An independent investigation has been launched, the council said.
In a statement issued through the council, Mr Travers said: “I have enjoyed my time at Barnet and I believe the changes we have put in place and the continued programme of growth and transformation will enable the borough to continue to thrive.”

A council spokesperson said Mr Travers had “made a valuable contribution to the council during his three and half years as chief executive.”

Deputy chief executive John Hooton will take over temporarily while longer term arrangements are put in place, the council said.

On election day, staff at one station said just three of the first 30 voters to show up were on the register. The rest were told to come back later.
Barnet Council apologised for the problems and later offered emergency proxy votes to residents who had been affected.

But voters in the area questioned how the result could be “fair” when not everyone was able to have their say at the ballot box.

A statement released by Mr Travers on Thursday blamed electoral registration lists for the problems.

The council’s review will conclude by the end of May and the findings will be presented publicly to the General Functions Committee.

It will look at the “appropriateness” of arrangements in place for the EU Referendum in June.

A spokesman said it was currently in discussions to establish who would lead the investigation.

And yet our CEO and Electoral and Returning Officer has arguably been far more remiss in East Devon, having had to explain in Parliament why he “lost” 6,000-plus voters (he decided not to send officers to canvass those missing from the electoral roll as recommended in electoral rules) and having had to re-issue postal ballot papers because of errors in the explanation of how many people to vote for, blaming “inexperienced officers” for the problem.

He was also scrabbling around on Twitter 48 hours before the PCC election as he did not have presiding officers for two polling stations.

Cabinet v. Committee system of district council governance

For the person who just asked what the difference is between Cabinet governance and Committee governance at district council level, this comment has been bumped to a post:

“Both the cabinet system and the committee system have committees, which ultimately report to and are approved by the full council, but in the cabinet system a small subset of the full council makes the policies and decisions without the remainder of the full council having a vote or any real say. According to Wikipedia, in a Cabinet system the full council is responsible only for agreeing the council’s constitution, electing the Leader, giving them a budget, and adopting the Local Plan – the Cabinet is responsible for all other policies and decisions, and full council can only raise issues or in extremis hold a Vote of No Confidence.

They key difference is that in the committee system, committees are represented by different parties in proportion to the membership of the full council, but a Cabinet is appointed by the Leader / Mayor and is typically formed only or mostly by members of the majority party and minority parties have far less influence.

Prior to the Local Government Act of 2000, the committee model was the only one that existed. The LGA abolished the committee system (which was seen as inefficient) and introduced 3 alternative models:

Leader and Cabinet – where the Leader is elected by the members of the council who then appoints a cabinet of their choosing

Elected Mayor and Cabinet – where the Mayor is elected separately by the electorate and they then appoint a cabinet of their choosing

Elected Mayor and Council Manager – where the Mayor is elected by the electorate but there is no cabinet. This option only had referendums for adoption in two councils of which only one was selected – in 2007 the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act abolished this option.

The Localism Act 2011 reintroduced the Committee system – it should be noted that EDDC Leader Paul Diviani was wrong when he said at Annual Council in May 2015 that they were not allowed to return to the Committee system (but then he would say that as the Cabinet system gives him a great deal of power).”

See Wikipedia: Executive arrangements ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_arrangement)”

London tour “Shines Light on Where Billionaires Stash Their ‘Dirty Money”

Kleptocracy Tours:

… “aims to shed light on where the world’s rich and powerful stash their billions.

With some high-end properties in and around London running at the tens of millions of dollars, the city is well-placed to launder illicit funds or park money that is being hidden from tax authorities. In fact, British officials estimate that around $173 billion in laundered money entering the country every year is whitewashed via bricks and mortar — with much of it ending up in the country’s capital.

… Why do so many of the world’s super-rich park their cash in London? Because it’s easy and it works, according to Borisovich.

“This is a place where a company can come, buy a luxurious piece of property, and just put down the name of its director without telling us who is behind it,” he said.

… Why do so many of the world’s super-rich park their cash in London? Because it’s easy and it works, according to Borisovich.

“This is a place where a company can come, buy a luxurious piece of property, and just put down the name of its director without telling us who is behind it,” he said.

“Everything else helps in London as well … I mean this is the best ownership legislation, robust, tested, it’s a cultural center, education center. But first and foremost is the ease with which dirty money can come here and anonymously buy anything,” he added.

The kleptocracy tour debuted in February before the revelations of the Panama Papers — a trove of leaked documents that shed light on a network of law firms and banks that offer financial secrecy and investments in low-tax regimes.

Growing interest in the tour’s outings feeds on the perception that many of the world’s richest are avoiding paying their fair due in taxes.

According to watchdog Group Transparency International, companies based in British territories overseas —former British colonies — own 36,000 homes in London.

“Were all those houses bought using illicit money? Probably not, but the rules create an environment where the corrupt can easily hide,” said Rachel Davies, the group’s head of U.K. advocacy and research.

Activists like Davies have long said that it is hard to get the government to take notice of loopholes in the U.K. ownership laws. That may get easier in the wake of the Panama Papers.

“What’s striking about the Panama Papers is the fact that it really blew the lid off the U.K. being involved in these issues,” she said. “Half of the companies involved in the Panama Papers are based in British overseas territories, almost 2,000 of the professional enablers, accountants, [real] estate agents, that were working with the Panama firm were based in the U.K.”

“The U.K., unfortunately, is complicit in the laundering of corrupt funds,” she added.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/tour-shines-light-where-billionaires-stash-their-dirty-money-n567556

Unfortunately, it isn’t only London – launderers are switching their interest to other prime sites in the UK – including Devon.

Dorset referendum: voters back committee system, not Leader and Cabinet

Hint, hint East Devonians!

“A VOTE for a change in the way West Dorset District Council is run has been hailed as a victory for “the will of the people”.

A referendum was triggered after the Public First campaign group gathered more than 6,000 signatures calling for a change from the council’s cabinet style system of governance to a committee based system.

More than 25,000 people cast their votes at the ballot box last week with 64 per cent of them backing the change of system.

A total of 16,534 voters were in favour of the committee system with 8,811 supporting the cabinet approach.

… Mr Grantham said the vote had succeeded in “sweeping away the failed cabinet system”, adding: “The council has to serve the public’s needs and make the best use of public funds.

“We trust that West Dorset District Council has finally heard the will of the people and will truly engage with us in greater democracy.”

The council’s leader Anthony Alford said: “Throughout this process one of the things I have been keen to ensure is that we do things to observe the law correctly.

“I’m very glad to say I have the utmost confidence we have proceeded with this referendum on the basis that confirms with the law and procedures and have gone through the referendum process very clearly and well.”

Cllr Alford said that the council had already agreed a structure for the new committee based system and it is expected to be implemented in May next year.

http://www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/14479865._A_VICTORY_FOR_PEOPLE_POWER___West_Dorset_votes_for_change_in_council_system/

“The UK needs to rethink its approach to the upholding of standards in public life”

“Is it time to re-think the UK’s public integrity strategy? Alan Doig argues that a new approach should be considered to take over from successive iterations of an increasingly ineffectual Committee on Standards in Public Life”:

http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=21687

Claire Wright on BBC Today programme this morning

Talking about the new charitable fund to encourage independent candidates in all constituencies.

She made the point that those who believe Independents cannot make their mark in Parliament are totally wrong – they have a great deal of influence and, being free to speak and free to act, can represent their voters more effectively.

And DEFINITELY more effectively than Hugo Swire, who constantly tells us that, because he is a Foreign Office minister, he is not allowed to speak on East Devon issues in Parliament! For East Devon issues, read all issues.

He says he IS allowed to lobby other ministers behind closed doors (where is the democracy in that?) but refused to bring up the issue of closure of East Devon community hospitals with Jeremy Hunt.

In the last minutes of the programme this morning.

Now available on iPlayer Here is the brief interview – at 02.55.32 – on this morning’s Today programme:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b079mwss#play

“Pollution risk from over 1,000 old UK landfill sites due to coastal erosion”

This particularly affects Exmouth where, at the Imperial Rec ground, plastic bags and other landfill rubbish leaches into the Estuary. And where toxic chemicals could wash down to the pish new seafront development.

Wasn’t there money set aside for remediation? Anyone in Exmouth have an up-to-date assessment of the situation?

“Over 1,000 old landfill sites on the coasts of England and Wales are at increasing risk of being breached by erosion, according to a new study, posing a serious pollution danger to wildlife and bathing waters.

Landfill sites before the mid-1990s had few or no restrictions about what rubbish could be dumped in them and little is known about what they contain. But many were on the coast and some were used to raise land levels and even as part of flood defences. Climate change is bringing higher sea levels and stronger storms, putting the old dumps at greater risk of being broken up.

The new study, the first of its kind and funded by the Environment Agency, assessed two landfill sites in Essex to find out the level of toxic pollutants in the waste they contained. It found large quantities of harmful metals, such as lead, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which are carcinogenic.

“Our findings show, that in the event of erosion, there would be serious environmental consequences due to the level of contaminants,” said Kate Spencer, an environmental geochemist at Queen Mary University of London, who led the research. “You would be likely to see significant effects on local animals and plants, from mortality to reductions in fertility. There would also be consequences for bathing waters.”

There are 1,264 historic landfill sites in the coastal zone where the risk of flooding has been previously estimated at 1-in-200 years. Of these, 537 are in or near bathing water catchment areas and 406 are in or near sites of special scientific interest.

With the predicted increase in sea level, extreme weather events and coastal erosion due to climate change, a national survey of the old landfill sites is urgently needed, said Spencer: “Nationally we need a much better inventory of sites that have eroded or are at risk of eroding – that is the priority.”

The scientists dug pits to investigate the contents of two sites in Essex: Leigh Marshes landfill, used from 1955-1967, and Hadleigh Marsh Landfill, used from 1980-1987. In the latter, which is used as a flood embankment, the researchers estimated there is 9,250kg of lead, 985kg of PAHs and 125kg of cadmium, among the 77,000 tonnes of waste.

The analysis found that all of the Leigh Marsh waste samples and 63% of the Hadleigh Marsh samples contained contaminants at concentrations that are above marine sediment quality guidelines, meaning that damaging effects to wildlife could be expected if the waste were to erode into surrounding wetlands.

Spencer warned that conclusions about other sites are hard to draw from these examples: “Many landfills were in use when there were no rules about what went in [so] every landfill is essentially unique and some will prove more risky than others.”

Flooding by the sea would expose the dumps to salt water, which the research found was much more effective at leaching pollutants from the rubbish than freshwater. But the team expect this would be less damaging than the landfills being broken up by erosion as the pollutants would be filtered by sediments.

The assessment of the risk posed by old coastal landfills is made more urgent by the fact that some parts of the coast, including Hadleigh Marsh, are being considered for “managed retreat”. This is where maintaining defences is not seen as cost-effective and the sea is allowed to flood an area, as happened at Medmerry in West Sussex in 2014.

The study suggests relocating the waste would be ideal but the costs of this would be so enormous that managed retreat is unlikely where historic landfills are present.

An Environment Agency spokeswoman said: “The risk of these landfills being affected by coastal erosion and rising sea levels remains low for the foreseeable future. This research will ensure ourselves, and local authorities, continue to have robust shoreline plans in place to help tackle any potential risks from erosion in future years.”

Essex County Council is responsible for the management and monitoring of the two sites analysed in the new study. Councillor Mick Page said: “The council and partners have developed the Essex and Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan and, subject to adequate finances being secured, it is the intention to establish survey stations and undertake regular monitoring in the future to inform future management decisions.”

Some old landfills have already been breached by erosion, such as one at East Tilbury, which attracted amateur collectors. “They were rummaging through this 75-year-old waste,” said Spencer. “I exercise caution. I wouldn’t pick the waste up or handle it.”

http://gu.com/p/4tpdv

Beer: officers recommend refusal of Clinton Devon estates development in AONB

So, Councillor Pook and Clinton Devon Estates v. a very persuasive argument from Officers then … which way will the DMC fall?

“The proposals will go before East Devon District Council’s (EDDC) development management committee on Tuesday. Planning officers have told members that the development could be ‘harmful’ to the village’s landscape, due to its location in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). They also say the proposal does not meet EDDC’s criteria for ‘exception’ sites outside the built-up area boundaries of villages, as it is too large. In a report to the committee, an officer said: “Given the harm to the character of Beer and harm to the AONB from further development, and given the difficulty in finding suitable development sites to meet the housing need, consideration has to be given to whether the affordable housing needs for Beer need to be met elsewhere, for example within Seaton, that is in close proximity.”

The application has received backing from the parish council and Beer’s district council ward member to help secure ‘affordable’ housing for people with a connection to Beer. Councillor Geoff Pook, ward member for Beer and Branscombe, said: “The one common issue has been the need to secure affordable housing for people with connections to Beer. More local children going to the school, less than 100 metres from the houses, will eliminate the ‘school drop-off’ car use required for children outside the local area. Beer has a good community spirit and the increase in full-time residents contributing to the shops, clubs, and general village life can only be positive.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/proposals_for_30_homes_recommended_for_refusal_1_4525183

Our new Police and Crime Commissioner’s plans

… “I would really like to invest in the technology that our police officers need,” she said. “The systems they currently have to support them while they are out on the streets are so ineffective.

“The more police officers that can be out on the streets rather than sat in the station the better. …

… “I would also like there to be more online opportunities for people to be able to have a conversation online with a police officer, said Ms Hernandez.” …

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/New-crime-czar-Devon-Cornwall-wants-invest-police/story-29246196-detail/story.html

Oh no … Owl can see it now …

…Press 1 for burglary
…Press 2 for assault …

…. or fill in our online form that will only take you long enough to lose the will to live.

And, if our all our police officers are out on the beat, who will be doing the “Live Chat” service online?

Maybe a call centre in India!

The gutter gets more clogged …

“Constitution-minded critics say that each year 12,000 pages of legislative detail are now introduced in ways that avoid scrutiny by either chamber of parliament.”

http://gu.com/p/4jx85

… and possibly about the same amount at East Devon District Council!

Hinkley C: UN says UK in breach of consultation on environmental risks

“The British government has run into a major new problem with the Hinkley Point C nuclear project, with a United Nations committee ruling that the UK failed to consult European countries properly over potential environmental risks.

Documents seen by the Guardian show Britain “is in non-compliance with its obligations” (page 21) to discuss the possible impact of any accident or other event that could affect those nations in proximity to Hinkley.

This is just the latest in a string of problems connected with the planned £18bn project to construct new reactors in Somerset, with the developer EDF of France recently delaying a final investment decision till September.

Paul Dorfman, a senior researcher at UCL’s energy institute, said the ruling from the UN Economic and Social Council throws great uncertainty over Hinkley.

“This is a huge blow to the government and introduces a whole new element of doubt over the scheme. It is hard to see how EDF can sign off any final investment decision whilst the government has yet to resolve this important issue.”

But the Department of Energy and Climate Change said it was convinced that the government had done all it had to do.

“Compliance with international obligations is something we take very seriously,” said a spokesman.

“We are confident that we have met the relevant international requirements in relation to Hinkley Point C. We have world-leading nuclear safety regulations in the UK, which Hinkley Point C would have to comply with.”

The British courts have in the past ruled against An Taisce (the Irish National Trust) which tried to block Hinkley on the grounds of insufficient consultation over the same safety issues. Dorfman said he expected a new legal challenge using the UN ruling.

The British government has been arguing for some years inside the committee with Continental countries saying in the past that it did not have to consult them because there was little or no likelihood of “significant transboundary environmental impacts.”

But Austria in particular has said that there should have been consultation because of the possibility of a severe accident that could lead to radioactive materials being spread by wind across Europe.

The Netherlands, Norway and Ireland have also argued they should have been consulted about Hinkley; the committee has finally agreed with them.

It recommends the UK “enter into discussions with possibly affected parties, including parties that cannot exclude a significant adverse transboundary impact from the activity at HPC, in order to agree on whether notification is useful at the current stage.”

Nuclear safety has been back in the public eye with the 30th anniversary of the Chernobyl accident last month and the recent fifth anniversary of the Fukushima crisis in March remembered.

Hinkley is the first new atomic plant planned in the UK for two decades and is a flagship project promoted at the very highest level of government. But confidence has been undermined by a range of problems.

Last week former EDF finance director, Thomas Piquemal, told a French parliamentary hearing that he had resigned in March because he believed Hinkley threatened the financial health of the energy company.

“Who would bet 60 to 70% of his equity on a (European Pressurised Reactor) technology that has not yet proven that it can work and which takes 10 years to build,” he said.

“In January 2015, I proposed to negotiate a three-year delay with our client because we reasoned that it would weigh too heavily on EDF’s balance sheet,” Piquemal said.

Since Piquemal’s resignation, EDF has announced a €4bn (£3.2bn) capital increase and the government has agreed to forego cash dividends for two years, generating an estimated €7bn euros in extra capital.

But while EDF has been coming up with plans to strengthen its capital, its even more financially troubled engineering partner, Areva, has run into deeper problems and its share price is now nearly 50% below where it was 12 months ago.

The French nuclear regulator, ASN, said it had been informed by Areva that its investigation had found evidence of irregularities in about 400 components produced since 1965, of which some 50 are believed to be in use in French nuclear plants.

Areva, which is in the middle of a merger with EDF, has already found faults at a new reactors it is constructing at Flamanville in Normandy. That scheme, like another at Olkiluoto in Finland, is using an EPR like the one planned for Hinkley and is both massively delayed and over budget.”

http://gu.com/p/4jx7e

Our Local Enterprise Partnership consulted no-one when it decided to put all Devin and Somerset’s financial eggs in Hinkley C’s basket.

Not really surprising when a good number of its members have nuclear business interests.

Exmouth: town council tells EDDC to listen to residents

Good luck with that!

“Exmouth town council has urged the East Devon district authority to listen to residents’ views on major plans to redevelop Queens Drive.

The call came after Tuesday’s unanimous town council decision to recommend East Devon District Council (EDDC) carry out an additional independent consultation as the £18m project reaches its third phase.

The consultation would be in addition to what is already required of the applicant and EDDC.

The decision was based on the wishes of residents who went to the polls last month.

94.9 per cent voted that, before any plans are approved, they want to see the plans for themselves.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Listen-people-Exmouth-seafront-plans-urge-town/story-29245435-detail/story.html

Torbay scraps elected Mayor: back to Leader and Cabinet

But no option to change to the Committee system. The change will take place in 2019.

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/OPINION-elected-mayor/story-29245448-detail/story.html

And totally by coincidence …

… the Sunday Telegraph has a 16 page supplement:

“Business Reporter – The Inspectors Call; Rene Carroll on why over-regulation is threatening to take the reward out of risk”

(see posts directly below)

including how to make best use of data mining your customers’ details including their use of the internet …

Osborne wants more Chinese investment in infrastructure

Hot on the heels of the news that the Chinese want to own more of Hinkley C (see post below) is further news in a Sunday Telegraph two-page spread that George Osborne is keen for them to invest in all areas of the UK economy, particularly infrastructure projects.

However, concerns have been raised that Chinese companies may not be able to adapt to stricter and more stringent regulation than they are used to at home and that they may use other countries to test out new technologies about which they are unsure. [That’s ok – we just keep watering down our regulations to suit them as with the financial regulations on banks, retail tycoons, etc].

Not to mention questions of national security (also in the post below). The Sunday Telegraph goes on to say that in 2013 a parliamentary intelligence and security committee concluded that the UK had left itself vulnerable to [Chinese] state-sponsored spying by allowing Huawai to become involved in the British telecoms industry.

So, that’s why we can’t get rural broadband – our conversations aren’t interesting enough!

Chinese to increase their stake in Hinkley C?

“A Chinese state-backed nuclear energy firm is considering taking a stake in the Hinkley Point C nuclear power station, one of its officials has said.

The Chinese National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC), along with another Chinese company CGN, had previously been in talks with EDF over investing in the scheme, but only CGN signed a deal.

Now a CNNC official has told The Sunday Telegraph that CNNC’s involvement is also in the offing and CGN had held talks on their behalf.

Xie Jiajie said: “The final proposal is for the Chinese to take a 33.5% stake in the project. “But this will be a combination of CGN and CNNC. “We haven’t decided what percentage we are going to invest.”

The return on any investment could amount to billions of dollars but the Chinese company said it would not announce the final figure until EDF’s final investment decision on the project is made.

The Sunday Telegraph said CNNC’s involvement was likely to be controversial because of its close ties to the Chinese government [and the Chinese military].

The Hinkley Point nuclear power plant in Somerset could ultimately produce 7% of British electricity and create 25,000 jobs, according to EDF.

It had been due to start producing electricity in 2023, but progress has been beset by delays because of funding problems.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-3579196/Chinese-government-backed-firm-considering-Hinkley-Point-stake.html

Looks like the skills our LEP should be investing in are Mandarin and French lessons for nuclear power engineers.

And maybe some cyber-security experts who can program in those languages.

It has already been reported that UK spy centre GCHQ has sought talks with Chinese companies involved to attempt to allay security concerns.

Still, it’s reassuring to know that GCHQ is fairly close to Hinkley C if anything untoward happens.

And now, for our next LEP smoke and mirrors event …

From this month’s Heart of the South West LEP newsletter:

“Another area of cross LEP partnership is the Nuclear South West partnership between HotSW, West of England, GFirst LEPs and Business West. Set up with the aim to build business legacy on the existing opportunities in the nuclear sector on the back of Hinkley Point C; but not exclusively related to Hinkley. We’ll have more news on the progress of this new initiative next time.”

http://us4.campaign-archive1.com

You want to know more about “Nuclear South West”?

“Nuclear South West launched on 22 September, as a not- for- profit initiative to enable businesses to network, facilitate supply chain development, share knowledge and most importantly secure new business.
The launch was an opportunity, not only to explain how Nuclear South West will be responsive to the needs of its members, but for the industry to articulate what it wants out of this much-needed nuclear sector business platform.

The benefits of membership will include regular events and training, networking and partnering, information and intelligence, promotional opportunities and access to key industry areas, not only new build, but decommissioning and defence also.

Gareth Davies, Director of Davies Nuclear Associates said:

“The launch was a great success, perfectly timed on the back of the government’s loan guarantee of £2billion to help fund the construction of Hinkley Point C nuclear power station. With some 150 potential members in attendance, there is a real interest in getting the network off the ground and making it a success. We look forward to working with Business West and spreading the word about the vast range of future opportunities in the nuclear sector.”

http://www.businesswest.co.uk/press-office/news-and-press/2015/09/25/south-west-businesses-gear-up-for-nuclear

or

“The Launch
Nuclear South West launched on 22 September at Leigh Court in Bristol with some 150 potential members in attendance. Phil Smith (Business West) and Gareth Davies (Davies Nuclear Associates) told the crowds about the benefits coming up – including events, training, networking, partnering, information and intelligence, promotional opportunities and access to key industry areas.
What’s Next?
Our new membership offer has been set and we have a programme of events lined up.
We offer a simple rate structure, focusing on just 4 sizes of company based on turnover and if you join before 30 June 2016, we’re offering a 20% discount on rates.
Just fill out our simple application form and we’ll get back to you.
http://www.businesswest.co.uk/membership/nuclear-south-west”

So, it’s basically a subscription networking service that allows Business South West and Davies Nuclear Services to flog its wares to anyone who pays up to join.

Any wiser? However, it does mention that they are in partnership with Davies Nuclear Associates, which turns out to be a private management consultancy, whose website has one page which states:

“We help our clients grow their businesses in the UK energy sector.
We do this by providing specialist management consultancy support and insight.
Under construction.
Come back soon”

http://www.dna-energy.com/

It seems a Gareth Davies owns the company and has done so since 2013, and yet it has no informative website, though Mr Davies is on Linkedin:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/gareth-davies-916a9121

and the only other director is Simon Hayhurst, the Company Secretary on whom there is no information.

So, the LEP joins Nuclear South West which is really a joint venture between Business South West and Davies Nuclear Consulting to …. well, get other people to pay to join them with the promise that they will open doors to offer:

“Supply chain development from both sides – either developing the one you have or getting you into a new one.

Bringing business together to network and share knowledge.

Maximising opportunities to support regional growth.

Women in Nuclear – working with Women in Nuclear (WiN) network

Future talent – working with Young Generators Network (YGN) and Young Chamber to develop the talent to power our nuclear sector in years to come.”

Anyone see anything tangible taking place here that benefits us lesser mortals in Devon?

Answers on a postcard …