It’s true: localism is dead – murdered!

“Automatic planning permission would be granted on many brownfield sites in England in an attempt to boost house-building, under government plans.

Ministers would also get powers to seize disused land, while major housing projects could be fast-tracked, and rules on extensions in London relaxed.

Chancellor George Osborne said reforms were needed because Britain had been “incapable of building enough homes”.
It follows a warning this week’s Budget would cut investment in new homes.

The proposed changes feature in a 90-page document to address Britain’s productivity record, to be released later.
It is aimed at boosting British workers’ output levels, which experts say lag behind other leading nations – an issue dubbed the “productivity puzzle”.

The chancellor’s Fixing the Foundations package has been billed by the Treasury as the second half of the Budget.

Upwards extensions

BBC political correspondent Ross Hawkins said Treasury sources argue house-building boosts productivity, as it is helpful to have workers living close to their workplaces.
Housing is just one part of a broad plan, they say.

The report also features proposals on higher education, transport, devolution of powers to cities and trade.

George Osborne says reforms are needed to planning laws so more homes are built.

Under the new proposals – which will need to be approved by MPs – automatic planning permission would be granted on all “suitable” brownfield sites under a new “zonal” system, the Treasury said.

The term brownfield refers to land that has previously been developed but is vacant or derelict.

Another change would see ministers seek to scrap the need for planning permission in London for developers who want to extend buildings to the height of neighbouring properties.
Planning powers will be devolved to mayors in London and Manchester, while enhanced compulsory purchase powers will allow more brownfield land to be made available for development.

There would also be new sanctions for councils that do not deal with planning applications quickly enough, and the government would be able to intervene in councils’ local development plans.

House prices

This week, the Office for Budget Responsibility warned government plans for rent reductions in social rented homes would hit housing investment.

The OBR said 14,000 fewer affordable homes would be built and cut its forecast for investment in private housing by 0.7%.

It also said house prices were expected to rise compared with both consumer prices and household incomes.

A Treasury source said the OBR assessment considered only the impact of the Budget and did not reflect the new policy.
In his Mansion House speech in June 2014, Mr Osborne said 200,000 permissions for new homes would be made possible by 2020 as councils put in place orders to provide sites with outline planning permission.

Housing ladder

The Treasury said the new plan went further – in effect stripping away the need for any planning permission in some brownfield locations.

The Conservative manifesto pledged to “ensure that 90% of suitable brownfield sites have planning permission for housing by 2020”.

In a statement released before the publication of the productivity plan, Mr Osborne said: “Britain has been incapable of building enough homes.

“The reforms we made to the planning system in the last Parliament have started to improve the situation: planning permissions and housing starts are at a seven-year high.
“But we need to go further and I am not prepared to stand by when people who want to get on the housing ladder can’t do so.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33472405

New planning policy to be announced tomorrow: upwards, outwards, fast, faster, ignore locals


“… A new “zonal” system, as employed in many other countries, which will give automatic planning permission on all suitable brownfield sites, removing unnecessary delays to redevelopment.

Power for the government to intervene and have local plans drafted setting out how housing needs will be met when local authorities fail to produce them, and penalties for those that make 50% or fewer planning decisions on time.

Analysis Housing and the budget: what you need to know:

In a budget with a heavy focus on housing, we’ve rounded up the key policies from the chancellor’s briefcase.

Stronger compulsory purchase powers to bring forward more brownfield land and devolution of planning powers, including powers over land, to the mayors of London and Manchester.

The right for major infrastructure projects that include elements of housing development to be fast-tracked through the Nationally Significant Infrastructure regime – meaning the project does not need to go through full democratic consultation.

Proposals to end to the need for planning permission for upwards extensions for a limited number of storeys up to the height of the adjoining building in the capital.

A package to support small and medium-sized housebuilders, including new sanctions for local authorities not processing smaller planning applications on time, with earlier fee refunds.

Local authorities say planning delays are caused by the lack of resources in planning departments, but the government is likely to provide a blueprint for how these planning requests should be handled.

Osborne fought a number of bruising encounters with conservationists in the last parliament, but seems to be determined to do so again on the basis that the supply of land at the right price has been the single biggest factor holding back housebuilding.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jul/09/osborne-tears-up-planning-laws-londoners-build-extra-storeys-on-homes

Coastal Communities Fund extended for further 5 years

The Coastal Communities Fund, which was launched in 2012, will make £90m in funding available until 2020/2021.
Seaside towns across the UK will be able to bid for a share of the funding.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-33467461

Now THAT’S a local newspaper!

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=23676:newspaper-wins-ftt-hearing-over-naming-of-unpaid-council-tax-councillor-&catid=59&Itemid=27

East Devon District Council and “dark rooms”

At yesterday’s local plan hearingss Natural England spoke of mitigation strategy and associated habitats assessment discussions which should not take place in “in a dark room”.

What on earth could they mean!

Majority of voters will be over 55 at the next election

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/11721749/Liam-Byrne-Labour-must-target-the-over-55s-or-stay-in-Opposition-for-10-years.html

Well that’s the pension triple lock and bus passes protected then!

Shame if you are a poor student who must now pay your maintenance allowance back but presumably they expect you not to vote next time round or be totally squashed by those pesky over-55s!

Daily Telegraph says planning rules may be further simplified to aid developers

Article by Christopher Hope has no web link. But the headline says it all.

If the NPPF slims down any further it will disappear completely. Aaah, we see!

“Sweating assets”: now your bowls club is not safe

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=23655:high-court-rejects-challenge-to-planning-permission-on-bowls-site&catid=63&Itemid=31

Cranbrook – over developed say – developers!

Interesting snippet from yesterday’s local plan hearing. Apparently developers were complaining that over-development in Cranbrook is depressing prices there and there is more money (sorry, better opportunities for housing supply) in other parts of the district.

Mr Thickett asked rather plaintively where the employment land was for the larger town. It appears planners had’nt really got to grips with that (though, of course, Skypark down the road and the abandoned inter-modal freight site are deserts waiting for rain),

Lower prices are better for us, not good for developers. Who does EDDC support?

Wonder what Mr Thickett thought of that?

He seems increasingly fed up with his visits to East Devon to try to sort things out – might he be ready to throw in the towel and rip the Local Plan up?

If he did the developer free-for-all will continue for years. That surely is not what East Devon Tory councillors want.

The Knowle bats – a question

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/East-Devon-bat-population-hit-office-demolition/story-26803273-detail/story.html

Question: how did the buildings get into such a state of dereliction that bats entered them in the first olace?

DCC cost of relocating offices to 2 floors of Barnstaple building

This begs the question: if £4 million was the cost for moving a few staff into 2 floors of a building – what is the REAL cost of building a totally new HQ?

“The council was proposing to move its staff from the civic centre, which has recently been vacated, and on to the top two floors of the Barnstaple Library building, one of which houses the record office.

But it today announced it is instead looking into plans to convert the civic centre annex into a modern open plan office.

This would cost around £3 million – £1 million less than the estimated £4 million it would have cost to redevelop the library building. …

… Councillor John Clatworthy, the county council’s cabinet member with responsibility for council property, said: “It would be wrong to rush head-long into a project at the library when we can spend £1 million less moving to alternative accommodation which is also suitable. It’s prudent that we looked at the options, and I’m pleased that a better solution has been found.

Read more: http://www.northdevonjournal.co.uk/County-council-scraps-plans-staff-Barnstaple/story-26863194-detail/story.html

Will Hugo Swire save Ottery St Mary hospital? Hhmmm!

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/help-save-Ottery-St-Mary-hospital/story-26862906-detail/story.html

He’s much better at examining the drains in Ottery and learning how to make pizza than doing anything about its hospitals – in contrast with election hopeful Claire Wright who continues to campaign tirelessly for all local community hospitals:

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2014/10/25/where-claire-wright-leads-hugo-swire-follows-except-where-drains-and-pizzas-are-concerned/

And googling for what he’s been up to this week reveals that he is much taken up with Mongolia, the Maldives and Latin America MUCH more exotic than Ottery St Mary.

Still, new District Councillor Paul Carter will no doubt step into the breach – after all, this is what you come into local politics for isn’t it.

The Asset Management … Group … Forum … bunfight … secret society …

This comment from Paul Freeman to an earlier article has been bumped up to a post because of its great importance in the Battle for Transparency:

“Ah, how I dream that the Asset Management meetings were actually a Committee – as indeed it really should be.

Committees are subject to legal transparency requirements – they need to be open to the public, they need to have published agendas and minutes.

But in its infinite wisdom – or as I call it hypocrisy – the council leadership have decided that the group of people who will manage the councils assets with meet in a Forum rather than a Committee, because then they don’t need to allow the public to be at the meetings and don’t need to publish agendas and minutes.

See if you can find Asset Management on the council meetings web page

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/committees-and-meetings/

But if you look here:

Click to access mtg-prog-201516-matrix.pdf

you can see the dates for the Asset Management meetings.

But if you read the EDDC Constitution which can be found at:

Click to access constitution-2014-october-.pdf

(something that the council leadership apparently doesn’t bother to do), then on page 31 it states “A Panel or Forum will normally sit in public.” (It also states “They will be an important vehicle for ensuring the involvement of the community in policy development and review”, so it is difficult to see how a closed meeting without published agendas or minutes meets this objective.)

Indeed, since it is not a committee, they don’t need to make the Asset Management Forum membership proportional to the number of councillors in each political group either. According to the minutes of the annual council in May 2015 which can be found at:

Click to access annual-council-270515-combined-mins-with-apps.pdf

on page 16 it says that the full members of this Forum are Andrew Moulding (Con.), Phil Skinner (Con.), Ian Thomas (Con.), Geoff Pook (Ind. come Con.), with Paul Diviani (Con.) and Stuart Hughes (Con.) as ex-officio members. So, despite holding 25% of the seats, there are no Independent Group councillors on this Forum at all.

Turning the Asset Management Forum into a formal Committee was a stated Aim of the East Devon Alliance candidates, and I imagine is still an objective if they can ever achieve it.

Is it any wonder that the more informed residents of East Devon think that there is a need for a fresh start at EDDC?”

Happy Clappy Midweek Herald!

Just to throw you off the scent, there is a “controversial” story on the front page but thereafter we continue to luve in Utopian East Devon!

A mildly critical story about EDDC ignoring the protected species of bat in their relocation plans is relegated to a small article on page 15 which gives more prominence to EDDC’s views than anyone else’s.

And Neil Parish is lauded for his efforts to publicise heart disease but NOTHING about him saying that the public (ie us) should be encouraged to “get behind” fracking.

We do at least still have the “View from” titles to give us a more balanced set of new stories each week.

Oh, and a quickie mentioned by someone from Sidmouth last week: why does the Sidmouth Herald carry a Beer news page when the Midweek Herald doesn’t? Beer is about 10 miles from Sidmouth and about 2 miles from Seaton. It couldn’t be snobbery, surely!

Seaton Beach Huts meeting: not a happy place for EDDC Councillor Pook

Councillor Pook, Chairman of EDDC’s Asset Management group was given a rough ride in Seaton this afternoon, according to this report from a correspondent:

Cllr Pook Needs Longer Spoon

Cllr Geoff Pook, the only “Independent” on East Devon District Council to refuse to work with the recently strengthened Independent group has been rewarded for this with a seat on the Cabinet by Paul Diviani and his non-whipping bulldog, Councillir Phil Twiss.

But almost immediately Cllr Pook has realised that the temperature under his own cabinet seat has been turned up to boiling point. For reasons best known to himself, Beer councillor Pook has it in his head to lead the charge to offer the district’s beach huts to the highest bidders, a policy his East Devon Tory playmates did not dare put in their manifesto this May.

At Seaton this afternoon, more than a hundred and fifty worried locals gathered to hear him explain himself, with Seaton’s own district councillor, Jim Knight, looking on in silence.

Pook initially made an attempt to defend the ridiculously loaded “survey” on beach huts to the gathering, switching as fast as he then could to a George Osborne-style line that East Devon District Council need to save more than two million pounds in the next four years. Beach huts would not be the only casualty to the Tory cutbacks, he said, but if an auction was not agreed his new chums would find another way to get “best value” from them.

Seaton folk are no fools and asked for some hard financial data on all this. This, said Pook “was being prepared”. The usual EDDC cart-before-horse strategic style.

It was obvious to anyone who has seen EDDC in action that Pook & Co will try to drive this through various committees before bringing it before his Cabinet in early Autumn. By then, without his being defeated by public action, it will be too late, and non-whipmeister Cllr Twiss will be growling from his enforcer’s seat to make sure at Full Council that any waverers on the Tory side put their hands up at the right time.

Meanwhile, back in Seaton, Pook finally realised that his uncosted, ill-considered scheme was being roundly booed by the usually very polite people in the room.. So he waffled that he had only just taken over as chair of EDDC’s Asset Management Committee, but nobody was buying his “I am only obeying orders” defence. The Asset Management committee is one of the most notoriously secretive of all the many hole-in-the-wall arms of the dismal district council. Still, at least none of his Beer constituents can say he is going against his election manifesto. Nobody voted for him; he was unopposed.

What next? Many in the room felt that one answer would be to provide even more beach huts if there is such a waiting list. Another idea is that the town councils take on the beach huts themselves – but be very, very careful with this one. How long before a town council, in Beer perhaps, “struggles” and sells the whole operation off to the private sector ….

Devon and Somerset county councils heavily criticised for poor management of broadband upgrade

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Calls-broadband-team-disbanded-wake-BT-fiasco/story-26850967-detail/story.html

Gypsy and traveller sites will be at Cranbrook

Word on the street is that Planning Inspector Mr Thickett would brook no nonsense – they will be at Cranbrook and there will be 30 pitches, they will all be completed by 2016 and that will all be in the plan – right he asks, right say subdued officers.

Now, we were told that “someone” would have to come forward with a site. It seems now that EDDC has a pretty good idea where that site (or sites) will be.

There may be quite a few people in Cranbrook expecting to share that information very soon – not least the new town council!

Day 1 of hearings over and Mr Thickett on cracking form!

Perhaps he will come and work for us one day and show how it’s done!

Crowd funding for justice is taking on a council’s planning decision

“The CrowdJustice website has unveiled a second potential legal action against a local authority in a matter of days.
The latest case concerns Hounslow Council’s grant of planning permission to developer Lend Lease for a residential complex of 13, 8, 7 and 6 storey buildings on Chiswick High Road overlooking Turnham Green.

The grant of planning permission was made “despite widespread opposition”, according to claimant Simon Kverndal.

He has already secured 84% of his £10,000 target with 22 days left.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=23634:crowdjustice-funding-platform-unveils-second-potential-case-against-council&catid=63&Itemid=31