As suggested by Hugo Swire in today’s Sidmouth Herald, here’s one to think about:
Source: http://www.dezeen.com/2008/02/17/mountain-dwellings-by-big/
or maybe this one:
http://www.al.com/business/index.ssf/2014/05/publix_to_build_grocery_store.html
As suggested by Hugo Swire in today’s Sidmouth Herald, here’s one to think about:
Source: http://www.dezeen.com/2008/02/17/mountain-dwellings-by-big/
or maybe this one:
http://www.al.com/business/index.ssf/2014/05/publix_to_build_grocery_store.html
This phrase from Greek mythology can be paraphrased as “Do not trust enemies who bring you presents — they could very well be playing a trick.”
This might apply in Sidmouth where EDDC seems to be keen on (part?)-financing a “scoping study” with Sidmouth Town Council for “eastern Sidmouth”.
Why the caution? A scoping study would be EDDC-led and would mean they choose the terms of reference and the consultant(s).
A Neighbourhood Plan for Sidmouth would be citizen-led with EDDC involvement.
Get the difference?
As Councillor Cathy Gardner puts it so clearly:
The study, run by East Devon District Council (EDDC) and the town council, would look at what a potential project for the eastern town could involve – and how such a scheme should be planned and implemented.
But Councillor Cathy Gardner, an EDDC member for the Sidmouth Town ward, has voiced concern that any such consultation would be ‘premature’ – and suggested waiting until the fate of a Neighbourhood Plan is determined.
The town council will decide in December whether to draw up a Neighbourhood Plan for the whole Sid Valley. If it goes ahead, the community-led document will involve consultation on things like where new homes and shops should be built.
It would also ask for views on what should happen in the eastern town.
“Cllr Gardner said: “My fear is that [the scoping exercise] has the potential to shortcut or even derail the prospect of doing a Neighbourhood Plan. The big benefit of asking [about the eastern town] as part of a Neighbourhood Plan is the solid methodology – it is the best way to get feedback from members of the public.
“Why would you rush [doing the scoping exercise] when you can do a really good quality consultation as part of a Neighbourhood Plan?
“It seems a bit premature.”
Cllr Gardner also warned that by asking residents the same questions in two separate consultations, there was a danger of ‘consultation fatigue’ and receiving less responses.
But EDDC says it thinks Sidmouth residents will welcome having their views represented in any plans for the town.
A council spokeswoman said: “We appreciate that Sidmouth Town Council is also considering a Neighbourhood Plan and it seems to us that the town council’s desire to move forward with one should not preclude the other – otherwise there is a danger that good ideas are delayed or blighted by an overly controlled approach.
“A Neighbourhood Plan is a possible future opportunity that should not inhibit what seems to be a clear appetite from the town council to regenerate the eastern end of town.
“Cllr Gardner has raised the question of consultation fatigue, which is an issue worth recognising and one that we and the town council will of course seek to avoid.
“As a Neighbourhood Plan takes at least two years to be put in place, it would be a shame to use that as a reason not to do anything else in the meantime.”
http://www.devon24.co.uk/news/sidmouth_could_launch_seafront_regeneration_scoping_exercise_1_4291585
Potential car parkers in the Mill Street car park in Sidmouth had charges hiked by more than 300% to £5,400 per year so it’s not surprising that they did not take up spaces which worked out at more than £14.79 per day.
We now hear that DCC are offering landlords, contractors and business owners ( which, of course will include developers) will be able to park on double yellow lines for £5 per day = £1,825 for 365 days of parking.
Mill Street – £14.79 per day
Double yellow lines – £5 per day
Today, the Express and Echo says there will be few checks on the £5 per day charge – indeed without appropriate legislation to define each category it will be impossible to do it at all. A source is quoted as saying “It’s all about the money”.
Yet another example of EDDC plc and Devon County Council plc – grabbing what they can when they can build their luxury HQ (EDDC) or to plug their own party’s funding cut black holes (DCC).
Sheer madness or sheer greed – take your pick.
Despite assuring people that this would not be a gated community, the statements made were somewhat vague (except, of course, there will be no affordable housing):
Number of homes: undecided
“Most” people expected to be local
Facilities “could be” open to the public
Hmmm …
http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/developer_reveals_hopes_for_knowle_1_4273815
Pegasus homes recently developed in Cornwall start at around £300,000 for a one bed flat and £600,000 for two beds plus service charge.
East Devon councillor Cathy Gardner reports on the EDA website:
“I had some new experiences this week – attending a ‘think tank’ and a Sidmouth Beach Management Plan (BMP) Steering Group meeting. Think Tanks are informal discussions arranged by Portfolio Holders (Cabinet members given specific areas of responsibility like Economy or Tourism). I have no idea yet if there will be any actions as a result of the discussions on Monday (12/10/15) but Officers were present and some good ideas were put forward. The topic of this meeting was how to use grant money that the Council had received for supporting the local economy. The workings of EDDC are becoming clearer, if still frustrating.
The BMP meeting was very informative, although progress seems to have been slow. The Steering Group consists of a range of people, mostly not on EDDC although it is Chaired by Cllr Moulding (Axminster) who is Deputy Leader. An area of concern is Alma Bridge: continued erosion means that another solution will be needed soon. Even so it seems highly likely that the coastal path will be diverted over the footbridge at the ford at some point. There does not seem to be any urgency from DCC to start work on a long-term answer (probably with the bridge further inland than it is now). They seem to want to wait until the BMP process advances some more. Another challenge for the BMP is the quality of the data being used to estimate erosion rate. This is a historical problem as good data has only been recorded recently, however the inclusion of data that everyone agreed was wrong seems counter-intuitive. We will have to wait many more months before a plan is drafted and then more months before funding is found to start work.
I hope this insight into the workings of EDDC is informative.”
A correspondent writes:
Councillor Twiss fires off another patronising fusillade at the newly elected Independent councillors who represent Sidmouth at EDDC as reported in last week’s Herald. “These new boys and girls just don’t understand the way things are done around here” seems to be the tenor of his comments. Cllr Gardner is accused of “Making political capital out of the vital issue of providing homes for Sidmouth’s young families”.
“The proposal to build social housing on the Mill Street car park at the cost of the existing residents around it losing vital car parking spaces is another case of using pious words to cover up previous mistakes.
We remind Cllr Twiss that in February 2011 the ruling Tory group approved a planning application for a site less than two hundred yards away which was for 12 homes at market rates exclusively for 55 year olds and upwards which have only very recently been completed! Then known as Parsons Yard it is now called Mill Gardens. Where are the homes for Sidmouth’s young families there? Perhaps they don’t generate the Council Tax revenue that these new ones do!”
The most extraordinary rant has appeared in the Sidmouth Herald under the authorship of (“I am not and never have been the Whip for the East Devon Conservative Party”) Councillor Phil Twiss, which is reproduced in its entirety below (with comments added). It puts us in mind of the early days of the sterling work of Councillor Claire Wright, when she was also attacked for attempting to change the much-derided status quo.
I have quoted the full press release provided by a local newspaper, not the shorter version in the Sidmouth Herald
WE WANT SIDMOUTH TO MOVE FORWARD, NOT BE HELD BACK’ (HELD BACK FROM WHAT?)
The Conservative Group on East Devon District Council (EDDC) have hit back at comments made by an East Devon Alliance councillor for her naïve and misleading rant in last week’s Sidmouth Herald. (So, here follows a naive and misleading rant from Councillor Twiss)
In the report, EDA Councillor Cathy Gardner, who represents Sidmouth Town Ward, claimed that a proposal to build social housing on the site of a car park in Mill Street was part of a wider plan for Eastern Town and spoke of the town being at risk of ‘fighting a battle but losing a war’.
Cllr Gardner is guilty of muddled thinking and of embarking on a naïve and misleading rant aimed at making political capital out of the vital issue of providing homes for Sidmouth’s young families. (You be the judge of who is out to make political capital here)
A consultation proposed by the EDA councillor would muddy the waters if and when the district council came to conduct its own public survey – which would take place as part of the normal democratic process. (So, what we always knew – early consultations muddy the waters and council surveys late in the day are the way forward)
ROUTINE
No firm plans had yet been drawn up for Mill Street and if and when such proposals were formed, a public consultation would follow as a matter of routine. (How much more firm could you be when you hike car park prices 300%, reduce ability to rent spaces and then put out a hasty press release saying you intend to turn it into social housing?)
It’s all very well for ward representatives to genuinely stand up for what they see as the rights of their constituents. It’s quite another to say things that will mislead people into forming the wrong conclusions, especially when this is based on a poor understanding of how the planning process works. (Still not sure what the “wrong conclusions” are here)
There is a lot of incorrect information in Councillor Gardner’s reported remarks and this displays either a naïve ignorance of the facts or a desire to stir up a political storm in a teacup – or both. (Not that he does not specifically say at any point what this incorrect information might be)
Councillor Gardner appears to be linking a possible plan for affordable homes in Mill Street with a wider redevelopment scheme for Eastern Town and even the project to create a Beach Management Plan for Sidmouth. Her suggestion that the Beach Management Plan lacked progress is mischievous and untrue. (But surely the proper thing to do in this situation IS to link plans for Mill Street to wider Port Royal and beach management? This is the joined-up thinking that Councillor Twiss and his colleagues say needs to be done)
Derogatory comments about EDDC’s ongoing and successful regeneration projects in Seaton and Exmouth take conspiracy theories to a whole new level of fantasy. (Oh wow – ask the residents of Exmouth and Seaton what they think of their so-called regeneration plans, Councillor Twiss. A big Tesco and non-affordable housing for Seaton. Exmouth – where a protest group is going from strength to strength as initial plans turn into luxury flats)
Building homes on the Mill Street site, if this did go ahead, would be part of the district council’s ongoing commitment to providing jobs and affordable housing for Sidmouth’s upcoming generation of school-leavers and young families and was entirely in line with the Government’s wish to see an end to a nationwide housing drought. (Er, no it isn’t – the Government just announced that it is dropping affordable housing from the requirements for developers – and as affordable rent is still considered 80% of the cost of non-affordable housing still well out of reach of Sidmouth’s young people).
MOVE FORWARD (er, not sure about that)
The Conservatives on EDDC want to see the district and its communities move forward, not stay stuck in the present or the past. They are following very carefully developed regeneration strategies in Seaton and Exmouth and these are based on years of careful study and prior consultation with the community. (See above – when consulted, both towns rejected EDDC’s plans – which went ahead anyway)
Ask fair-minded councillors in Seaton and Exmouth whether regeneration projects in their towns have been beneficial and you might get a different view from the jaundiced judgement of Ms Gardner. (Ah, fair-minded councillors – these seem to be anyone who agrees with Councillor Twiss!)
Sidmouth must not be left behind. We want to see a number of improvements to help the town move forward and we will resist any attempt by people like Ms Gardner to hold Sidmouth back. (Did you notice here that none of the so-called improvements are named? That’s because there aren’t any apparently!)
Any assumption by recently elected councillors that nothing happened before they arrived on the scene is both naïve and arrogant. A lot of good things are happening. These new councillors should make the effort to find out how hard members and officers have worked in the past and resist the temptation to be new brooms sweeping away good ideas just for the sake of scoring cheap political points. (Oh, Councillor Twiss – it is precisely because such a lot DID happen before they were elected that they got elected in the first place. Just why should new councillors be tied to the past and why should they not be new brooms – and just who is trying to score cheap political points here?)
Well done, Councillor Gardner – you must be doing something right if you have brought out the attack dogs so early in your councillorship! Keep up the good work for the citizens of Sidmouth! They needed someone like you and the district needs someone like you to hold power to account.
” …This isn’t about the Mill Street car park – it’s about the whole of the eastern side of town,” said Cllr Gardner. “It’s to do with plans for Port Royal and the seafront. Everyone can get excited about the rights and wrongs of increasing parking charges, but it’s part of a bigger picture.
“EDDC owns a lot of land there and I don’t know if people are aware of how much – the lifeboat station, the Drill Hall and the sailing club are all in the Local Plan for development. …”
Is a development that immediately increases a village’s population by 10% too big? Most think so:
http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/40_homes_plan_too_big_for_sidbury_1_4246567
“District councillor Matt Booth, a Sidmouth town ward member, said the first he saw of the ‘bombshell’ Mill Street proposals was in the Herald – and claimed the authority showed a ‘lack of transparency’.
Mr Booth claimed: “It has a problem of transparency and accountability – and it can’t go on ignoring that.
“It does a disservice to the councillors and officers who do such fantastic work. It’s also massively disrespectful to us as ward members – we weren’t consulted.”
Cllr Booth said he and Councillor Cathy Gardner had met EDDC chief executive Mark Williams two months ago to talk about how the section 106 funding would be spent. Cllr Booth said they discussed potential affordable housing on the Manstone Depot site or in Woolbrook Road – but claimed Mill Street car park was never mentioned.
An EDDC spokeswoman said: “We would like to emphasise that this is very early days in the decision-making process and that absolutely nothing has yet been agreed.
“There will be a fully transparent and participative debate about how people would like to see this important site used to its best advantage in the tow
And follow Sidmothian conversations here:
http://futuresforumvgs.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/the-district-council-developing-mill.html
As the exchange of views here suggests:
All well and good talking about restrictive covenants but they were not much use in Exmouth when East Devon District Council bought out restrictive covenants which were owned by Clinton Devon Estates which would have held up developments.
And if some parkland is used for parking as mentioned in the article, what is to stop Pegasus using it as an overflow car park for their luxury retirement complex?
Many questions still to be answered.
http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/covenant_to_protect_future_of_knowle_park_1_4238238
According to the “Driving” section of today’s Sunday Times page 7), DCC Councillor Stuart Hughes (Highways portfolio) has trained to act as a Road Warden in Sidmouth.
“If there’s a pothole that people are concerned about then they can give me a call and I can do a temporary fill … “.
he is quoted as saying in the article.
Now, that should come in VERY useful if Sidford Fields is developed into an industrial estate, though he may not have time for the day job!
Recall that, with no consultation whatsoever, built-up boundaries for Dunkeswell and Chardstock were changed and inserted into the latest draft of the Local Plan.
Dear Sir/Madam
East Devon Villages Plan – consultation on proposed criteria for defining built-up area boundaries for villages and small towns
The council is reviewing its approach to defining its ‘Built-up Area Boundaries’ and wants your input.
We have prepared a brief paper, which is attached, that sets out what we would like to do and how you can get involved. We have also included an update paper on the Villages Plan for information.
If you have any comments on the approach set out, please write to us on or before Monday 21 September 2015 so that we can consider them before we prepare the next stage of our ‘Villages Plan’.
You can submit your views by either writing to us at Planning Policy, East Devon District Council, Knowle, Sidmouth, EX10 8HL or sending an email to us at localplan@eastdevon.gov.uk. Please put ‘Villages Built-up Area Boundary Consultation’ in the subject box of the email or at the top of your letter. It would be helpful if you could respond to the 5 questions set out in the consultation paper.
Please contact the planning policy team on 01395 516551 if you have any queries.
Yours faithfully
Linda Renshaw (Mrs)
Senior Planning Officer
Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays
East Devon District Council
( 01395 571683
8 lrenshaw@eastdevon.gov.uk
” http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk
* Planning Policy Section, East Devon District Council, Knowle, Station Road, Sidmouth, EX10 8HL
Sidmothian Jeremy Woodward (who began the Freedom if Information process that East Devon District Council lost in court about secret relocation meetings and papers) is, as of this moment, only £30 away from raising the £660 needed to begin another challenge to EDDC.
This time it is about appropriation of Knowle parkland to enable developers of luxury retirement homes to have a larger outside space.
https://www.crowdjustice.co.uk/case/save-knowle-parkland/
Anyone who thinks this is a good cause is urged to donate the remaining amount. As mentioned before – this is NOT just about Sidmouth. This is about EDDC favouring developers over its own citizens and could happen anywhere in the district where EDDC own land.
As of this morning, 50% of the £660 needed to begin the process of a possible legal challenge to EDDC’s appropriation of parkland to extend the private grounds of the planned Pegasus Life luxury retirement complex has been raised:
https://www.crowdjustice.co.uk/case/save-knowle-parkland/
This is not only a Sidmouth issue: this same land grab could happen anywhere in East Devon where a greedy developer fancies a slice of public land owned by EDDC.
https://www.crowdjustice.co.uk/case/save-knowle-parkland/
Sidmothians – and others who wish to save our historic parkland are being asked to contribute towards a fund of £660 to draft a pre-action protocol letter setting out the legal errors in the Council’s decision.
The specialist legal practice of Richard Buxton Environmental & Public Law has been recommended by campaigning group SAVE Britain’s Heritage to do this work.
http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/top_accolade_for_coastal_scheme_1_4162706
Compare with this “progress”:
http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/progress_in_sidmouth_s_coastal_defence_project_1_4162256
Eat your hearts out Pennington Point residents.
To read this EDDC spin you would assume that the project on Sidmouth coastal defences has gone fantastically well. In reality it has dragged on, and on, and on. And reading between the lines, that is exactly how it will continue.
A particular masterpiece of spin that has us laughing out loud is this from Andrew Moulding:
“It is tremendously exciting to have reached the fourth stage of this long and technically challenging coastal defence project – we are now only a short step away from being in a position where we can actually start to produce the BMP itself and provide a detailed plan for the short, medium and long-term management of the beach and cliffs.”
http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/progress_in_sidmouth_s_coastal_defence_project_1_4162256
A short step away from STARTING!
Oh, and they forget to mention that, with 25-40% cuts in government spending, the chances of anything happening are slim.
Contrast this with Lyme Regis where a £20m four-phase scheme was completed in one year in 2014 which consisted of a 390m (1,200ft) stretch of sea wall should last 50 years and will safeguard nearly 500 homes and access to the town.