“Help to buy is riddled with loopholes that the privileged can easily exploit”

” … a loophole in the details of the government’s flagship starter homes scheme could be exploited by prospective buy-to-let landlords – there is currently no stipulation that the buyer must live in the property. So potentially, wealthy parents could hand a child a lump sum to purchase a starter home with a 20% discount, then let the property out.

Rather than a sustainable and measured solution to the housing crisis, the government has built a house of cards: a few haphazard measures designed to temporarily boost the number of first-time buyers, without examining the foundations of the problem, but also leaving each scheme open to exploitation. In London, the capital’s specialised help-to-buy scheme doesn’t even require applicants to be first-time buyers to be eligible – they just have to be moving house.

A better solution would be one that tackled booming house prices and low building rates instead of throwing state cash at the problem and hoping it solves it, rather than simply gilding the pockets of the private sector.”

http://gu.com/p/4hejm

Council officers, don’t you just love ’em … not in Torridge

“A DEBATE on a planning decision which “diminished the democratic process” had councillors questioning the constitution process and delegated powers given to planning officers.

Councillor Sam Robinson put forward a notice of motion in last Monday’s full Torridge District Council (Feb 7) meeting, to have the monitoring officer re-assess their constitution and develop a protocol that will overcome what he believes “is the present lacuna and democratic deficit”.

Mr Robinson told a packed town hall the catalyst was a planning application refused by the plans committee on a five-two vote.

The application, by Turley, for up to 200 homes in Heywood Road, Northam, was refused – then an appeal was lodged but planning officers said they would not be defending the appeal.

http://www.northdevonjournal.co.uk/Torridge-District-Council-questions-powers-given/story-28742789-detail/story.html

“Commons watchdog chair Sir Kevin Barron steps aside from committee over ‘rules breach’ “

“The Labour MP who oversees ethical standards in the Commons has stepped aside from his role following a Telegraph investigation into his business dealings.

Sir Kevin Barron, the chairman of the standards committee, agreed a contract with a group of companies that said he would arrange events in Parliament in return for payment – an apparent breach of the rules.
y
On Thursday he announced that he had referred himself to Kathryn Hudson, the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner, over the disclosures.

The move means that two members of the committee that regulates MPs’ behaviour now face inquiries by Mrs Hudson. Earlier this week the Telegraph disclosed how Tommy Sheppard, an SNP member of the committee, was being investigated over his failure to declare a shareholding worth £200,000. He blamed an “administrative error”.

Sir Kevin’s announcement came after the Telegraph revealed how he undertook to provide “services”, including sponsoring events in the House of Commons, for the Japanese Pharmaceutical Group (JPG) in return for thousands of pounds. …”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/12190163/Commons-watchdog-chair-Sir-Kevin-Barron-steps-aside-from-committee-over-rules-breach.html

What has been your experience of our local NHS “Stay Well” campaign this winter?

NHS NEW Devon CCG are currently running a short survey to help evaluate the national and local winter campaign. The aim is to find out if their efforts are making a difference.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/NHSwinter?platform=hootsuite

Vital flood research funding cut by two-thirds

“Funding for “vital” research to improve flood forecasts, warnings and defences has been slashed by almost two-thirds since 2009, figures obtained by the Guardian show.

The annual funding for flood research and development, which the government has not published, has fallen from £4.89, in 2008-09 to £1.85m in 2015-16, a drop of 62%.

“The government says evidence is required but they have cut the R&D [research and development] budget that could have provided it,” said Prof Edmund Penning-Rowsell, at the Flood Hazard Research Centre at Middlesex University and a member of a group that advises the government on its flood R&D programme, which he also previously chaired.

“David Cameron is dead keen on security in relation to the EU issue, but what about security at home, protecting people, houses and businesses from flooding?”

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/mar/10/vital-uk-flood-research-funding-slashed-by-nearly-two-thirds

Tory MPs against “growth”?

27 Tory MPs voted against allowing shops to open all day on Sundays and the Government was defeated.

Government Minister Brandon Lewis said they had stopped “one billion pounds of growth”.

Does this mean that ar least 27 Tory MPs are not swayed by their party’s mantra of growth, growth and only growth?

Seeds of dissent …

“EDDC falls foul of its own policies”

“Exmouth Splash – FacebookPublic Opinion & Discussion Page

A little while ago we reported that EDDC had decided to make permanent a trial that restricted the right to speak at public meetings.

Thanks to one alert Exmouth resident, it was noticed that on the list of speakers in the planning matters relating to Queens Drive, two names had appeared to speak in support. One was Ian MacQueen chairman of Exmouth Chamber of Commerce who is also on the Exmouth Regeneration panel. The second name didn’t ring any bells locally.

One of the conditions now set by EDDC for speakers is that they must have previously submitted a written comment on the application. Nobody could find any such written representation from Mr MacQueen or the second party. In fact there were no comments in support from anyone.

EDDC were contacted by a number of pteople who questioned why these two speakers were on the list to speak in what appeared to be a clear contravention of the new EDDC rules.

The two individuals were removed from the speakers list but we have no explanation as to how ever they got on the list (yet- we will ask).

Cllr Moulding was also on the list to speak but this too seemed to be without complying with the new rules. He was allowed to speak – the explanation being that it was at the chairman’s discretion. Although this seems fundamentally wrong to give the applicant (EDDC) more than the one permitted opportunity to speak, Cllr Moulding’s apparent comments about the swan ponds being nothing more than holes in the ground may well have helped the case for opposing the applications!”

Broadband suppliers to be forced to give automatic refunds for slow speeds or loss of service

Recall that EDDC is planning to go-it-alone for broadband distribution in East Devon. Will EDDC or the broadband provider pay the automatic compensation if the service goes down? If it is EDDC it would mean that all of us would end up paying for outages!

“Ofcom, the communications watchdog, has said BT and other operators will have to pay consumers and businesses when they are cut off or have slow broadband.

Mr Moore said: “I would welcome automatic payouts, but it depends on the amount of compensation. What we were offered was pittance. We are still being massively affected.”

Under the current system for telecommunications, customers have to make a claim for compensation rather than receive an automatic payout.

The new ruling is likely to be similar to automatic compensation schemes imposed on utility companies in which customers receive discounts when there is a problem.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Broadband-automatic-compensation-scheme-welcomed/story-28892867-detail/story.html

Electoral registration – changes “negative for democracy”

“Reforms to the electoral registration process under this and the previous coalition government have led to changes which experts and campaigners alike have described as negative for democracy.

We stand at a critical crossroads in our democracy. The number of people that are on the electoral register is in long-term decline. It was estimated that up to 7.5 million people were not registered in 2014. During the transition to individual electoral registration (IER) another 1.4 million names were removed. Dramatically, the number of attainers, our next generation of voters, fell by 40%.

In a draft report, co-authored with Bite The Ballot, and presented to the All-Party Parliamentary Party on Democratic Participation for discussion today, new information is unveiled about the nature of the problem. Findings from a new UEA survey of electoral administrators, as detailed in the report, shows that two-thirds of electoral administrators agreed that citizens had complained to them about the registration process being bureaucratic. Roughly half of electoral officials thought that the completeness of the register had declined.”

http://www.democraticaudit.com

St Modwyn (Skypark developer) and its car park inaccessible to – cars!

St Modwen is the developer of Skypark – the developer which says it could take years and years to fully let. It seems time for a bit of a shake-up in its regeneration project planning department …

“A rooftop car park in Farnborough has become the centre of a UK-wide controversy after it was discovered to have no vehicular access.

The 80-space car park, which is atop a gym and shopping complex in the Hampshire town, is no new development however. It has been empty since the building was completed five years ago, despite promises back then to residents of an adjacent apartment block for whom the parking was destined that it would be useable within weeks.

While the block’s developer, St Modwen, denies that the car park is a secret, it has remained relatively under the radar until recently, when plans to redo two town centre car parks highlighted the problem of parking in the area.

Local councillor Gareth Lyon told The Independent: “We have a massive problem with car parking in Farnborough. To have had this huge car park lying empty defies belief. It is ridiculous.”

The official reason for the lack of access ramp is the plan for a bridge to link it to another building on which construction has not yet begun.

St Modwen, which describes itself as the UK’s leading regeneration specialist, is spearheading an £80m revival of Farnborough’s town centre, under which the complex falls. A spokesperson for the company refused to comment on when the development would be completed and vehicle access to the car park built.”

Source: AOL news

75 bed Premier Inn for Seaton

Planning application 16/0424/MFUL has been validated but documents are not yet online. So far, reaction in Seaton seems unanimously positive, the town having sorely lacked this level of tourist investment. The hotel will be sited on the regeneration area on Harbour Road close to Tesco, Seaton Tramway and the Jurassic Coast interpretation centre due to open by Easter.

The remaining development large tourism development site in Seaton is at Seaton Heights on the A3052, which has had planning permission for many years but has had numerous setbacks.

Parish and Swire vote to cut disability benefits

“The House of Lords has been unable to stop a planned £30-a-week cut to disability benefits forced through by Government MPs.

Charities have warned that the cut to the Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) WRAG would make it more difficult for disabled people to find work and that many struggled to afford food on the benefit at its current level.

The Government however says the cut, which applies to new claimaints, will incentivise disabled people to find work.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/esa-wrag-disability-benefit-cut-disabled-mps-vote-tories-iain-duncan-smith-a6918556.html

Will EU referendum purdah rules affect some or all council decisions from 27 May 2016?

“It means even more major government decisions and activity will be postponed until June, adding to the delays in the government’s childhood obesity strategy, Trident, BBC reforms and airport expansion.

The combination of the elections to the Scottish parliament, Welsh Assembly, London mayoral elections and local council votes across England and the national referendum on Britain’s EU membership means Government will be forced to abandon much of its other work due to neutrality rules during election periods.

Purdah – which bars the use of public money to promote one side in the final weeks before a poll – will block ministers or civil servants making any major decisions until after the elections are over.”

In the case of the EU referendum, this commences on 27 May 2016.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3481915/The-great-referendum-shutdown-Ministers-civil-servants-set-twiddling-thumbs-work-THREE-WEEKS-Easter-June-s-EU-poll.html

Pensioner holds up Southend seafront development for 10 years …

“Florence Hall has rejected several offers to leave her Southend-on-Sea home despite being the only remaining resident in her block. The 75-year-old bought her house in 1964 with her late husband.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3481848/Southend-Sea-pensioner-stalls-60million-seaside-development-ten-year-battle-avoid-selling-beloved-terraced-home-s-lived-66-years.html

The government is channelling £12 billion to Local Enterprise Partnerships (see below). This money is to be used on projects of their choosing. The people choosing are predominantly business men and (some) women and a handful of top councillors. Decisions are made by a simple majority.

This is mostly money that, in the past, would have gone to local authorities which would have been accountable to us for it and their choices would be subject to the ballot box. Our LEP is spending an awful lot of it on the projects allied to the Hinkley Point C power station – when even its owners have very cold feet about investing.

Our LEP meets in secret and produces only sketchy notes of its deliberations. We have no idea if it has any sub-committees or who is on them. We do not know how to access its accounts or what form they take. We do not even know how many people they employ or what their jobs are. Heck, even their postal address is a post office box number

Heart of the South West LEP, PO Box 805, Exeter, EX1 9UU

and their contact numbers are mobile phones:

http://www.heartofswlep.co.uk/contact-us

where it also says this:

“By telephone: 01935 385977 – The LEP does not have a Head Office and this number is kindly answered by one of our partners, who will take a message and forward onto the appropriate person in the LEP to answer. This service is kindly provided by Yeovil Innovation Centre, supported by South Somerset District Council.”

Anyone else as worried as Owl?

National Audit Office consultation: Local Enterprise Partnerships accountability and value for money

“The government has been working to rebalance the economy away from its dependence on financial services since 2010 by empowering local communities to tailor their approach to economic development to local circumstances. Key to this are local enterprise partnerships (LEPS) – partnerships between local authorities and business established in 2010 following the abolition of the Regional Development Agencies. Starting in 2015, funding to LEPs has increased significantly, and will exceed £12 billion between 2015-16 and 2021-22. Our study will consider whether the government’s oversight of LEPs is likely to deliver value for money and how transparent and accountable LEPs are for this funding.

Email using our contact form selecting Local services as the topic, marking it for their attention in the subject field.

https://www.nao.org.uk/work-in-progress/local-enterprise-partnerships-accountability-and-value-for-money/

Hinkley C: not all bad news (for some)

Interesting commment on a Guardian article today on Hinkley Point:

“It was one of the Coalitions first major announcements in 2010 which they rushed into.

However Dame Elizabeth Periam Gass, Lady Gass DCVO JP, Lord-Lieutenant of Somerset from 1998 to 2015 sold a bit of her estate near Hinckley Point for £50 million for it’s construction. [in 2011]

Not that she did anything illegal you understand but it does show how much money spins off from a project as big as this. I wouldn’t mind betting many others of the already rich have had a similar fortunate happening.”

Confirmed by this 2011 article in Western Daily Press of 2011:

http://www.westerndailypress.co.uk/Nuclear-land-deal-leaves-Lady-Gass-pound-50m/story-13875250-detail/story.html

Judge overturns Planning Inspector’s decision challenged by council – on grounds of landcape quality and sustainability

“A district council has won a High Court appeal after an inspector granted a developer planning permission for 85 dwellings and associated works, in a key ruling on the operation of the National Planning Policy Framework.

In August last year Gladman Developments won permission on appeal for the scheme on land north of Ross Road in Newent.

Forest of Dean District Council, which had in February 2015 refused permission, appealed under section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

In its challenge to the inspector’s decision the local authority advanced four grounds of appeal. They were that the inspector:

Failed to consider and give reasons as to whether the site was a ‘valued landscape’;


Incorrectly applied the NPPF at paragraph 134 and the test on harm to heritage assets;

Failed to consider the interaction between paragraph 134 and paragraph 14 [the presumption in favour of sustainable development] of the NPPF and therefore applying the wrong test;


Gave inadequate reasoning.


The Communities Secretary accepted that Ground 3 had been made out and joined Forest of Dean in asking the judge, Mr Justice Coulson, to quash the decision.

Gladman Developments did not accept Ground 3.

In Forest of Dean District Council v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Anor [2016] EWHC 421 (Admin), Mr Justice Coulson ruled that Forest of Dean’s application on Ground 3 had been successful.
The judge also concluded that it could not be said that, if the inspector had applied the right test, he would necessarily have reached the same answer.

Mr Justice Coulson therefore allowed the application to quash.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=26204:judge-quashes-planning-permission-for-85-home-scheme-after-appeal-by-council&catid=63&Itemid=31

Community hospitals: NHS fighting itself – and hospitals must make profits

What a despicable state of affairs we have in East Devon, where our community hospitals are treated only as cash cows:

Sidmouth:
http://www.eastdevon24.co.uk/news/ownership_change_does_not_bode_well_for_future_of_sidmouth_victoria_hospital_1_4446907

Ottery:
http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/fears_over_ottery_hospital_ownership_change_1_4446362

Budleigh:
http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/800k_wellbeing_hub_in_budleigh_has_ground_to_a_halt_1_4425934

The situation in Budleigh is complicated by the fact that if the in-fighting is not resolved the site will revert to Clinton Devon Estates, and we all know what that means.

Beware devolved powerhouses!

“It is the government department tasked with delivering the chancellor’s “northern powerhouse” agenda and devolving power to cities and regions. But 97.6% of senior civil servants at the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) are based in London, the government has admitted.

Just 2.4% of the DCLG’s most powerful public servants work outside the capital, according to Brandon Lewis, a DCLG minister and Tory MP for Great Yarmouth.

More and more senior civil servants across all government departments are based in London, another minister admitted. On 1 April 2010, 65.1% worked from London, compared with 67% five years later, said Matthew Hancock, minister for the Cabinet Office.”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/mar/07/97-of-top-officials-at-northern-powerhouse-department-work-in-london