So, guess who EDDC’s new external auditors will be

Yep, former auditors Grant Thornton – the ones who found no problems following the expulsion from the local Tory party and subsequent resignation of disgraced ex-councillor Graham Brown after the front page sting in the Daily Telegraph.

And too late to send any representations about it.

“Having carried out their procurement exercise and decided on the scale of work to be allocated to each of the winning bidders, PSAA notified the Chief Finance Officer and Chief Executive that it was consulting on the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as being successful in winning a contract and their appointed to EDDC for the 5 years from 2018/19, the appointment starting on 1 April 2018. Any representations to the proposal would need to be received by 22nd September 2017, as there was no reason to object to this appointment no representation was made.”

Click to access 161117agcombinedagenda.pdf

You can’t make it up: Persimmon wants more government help for developers!

“Housebuilder Persimmon has urged the Government to push ahead with simplifying the planning system as its order book for new homes continues to rise.

The company said in a trading update on Wednesday that, despite efforts to force local councils to identify sites for housing, “achieving detailed planning consent for the land identified is proving as challenging as ever”.

Under the National Planning Policy Framework, which was introduced by ministers in 2012, councils must draw up plans to build homes in their areas. However, it is estimated that almost half of councils are yet to publish a draft local plan.

Persimmon said it was “keen to work with all stakeholders taking part in the Government’s housing white paper consultation” in order to make sure that the planning process is simplified, which it says would result in more homes being built.

The white paper, which was published in February, sets out a raft of measures intended to stimulate the housing market.

Jeff Fairburn, chief executive of Persimmon, said: “A lot of good work has been done on the planning system but more progress needs to be made and that would hopefully be of benefit to the whole of the UK economy.”

He said that sales of homes had strengthened after the summer period, a traditionally quieter time for house purchases.

Persimmon said on Wednesday that trading in the past four months had been driven by attractive mortgage rates and the Government’s Help to Buy scheme. It reported that it has around £909m of forward sales reserved beyond 2017, an increase of 10pc on the same point last year.

It added that sales rates had been flat on the prior year because of a surge in sales after the Brexit referendum, although they were 14pc up on the same period two years ago.

Shares in the firm were down 3.76pc to £27.66 on Wednesday, although the company remains one of the best performing stocks on the index. …”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/11/08/persimmon-urges-government-take-action-planning-system-encourage/

“Private equity firm made struggling care home operator take costly loan”

“Britain’s second biggest care home operator was made to borrow money through a very expensive loan from its private equity owner in a deal designed to extract £890m in cash from the struggling business.

The disclosures are likely to raise fresh concerns over the future of Four Seasons Health Care, which operates more than 300 care homes across the UK, and has been drowning in debt.

Described in reports as teetering on the brink of ruin, Four Seasons has been hammered by cuts to council care budgets brought on by years of austerity. This month, its private equity owner, Terra Firma, will plead with lenders to approve a financial rescue package.

However, filings in the tax haven of Luxembourg and data from the Paradise Papers reveal how Terra Firma hoped to make a vast profit from the business after acquiring it in 2012.

Four Seasons was made to borrow £220m from Terra Firma subsidiaries. The repayment terms were huge – 15% interest a year, on a compound basis, over 10 years. By 2022, when it was due to be repaid, Four Seasons would have owed its controlling shareholder four times the original sum.

The debt was later written off because of the financial struggles at Four Seasons. However, the bond stated a nominal repayment value of £890m. The intention seems to have been to extract profits from any future sale of the business largely tax-free – a manoeuvre that will raise concerns about whether buyout groups are suitable owners for businesses that form a key part of Britain’s care infrastructure. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/nov/08/private-equity-terra-firma-care-home-four-seasons-loan

What do you have to do to get sacked if you are a Tory these days?

“As a prime minister drained of authority struggles to hold her party together, ambitious ministers feel increasingly able to cock a snook with impunity.

This week’s rows over Boris Johnson’s dangerous handling of a disagreement with Iran, and Priti Patel’s freelance policymaking in the Middle East may seem a coincidence.

But the conduct of the foreign secretary is bound together with that of the international development secretary.

Both Mr Johnson and Ms Patel are able to play fast and loose because normal collective cabinet disciplines no longer apply. The prime minister is afraid to reprimand or sack. In this government it is everyone for themselves. …”

and yet there are people who will continue to vote for them.

It says as much about their voters as it does about their Ministers and MPs.

And so many of their voters in East Devon – where we had our own mini-scandal when Diviani voted against his own district councillors at county council over closure of community hospitals.

Did Tory district councillors sack him? No, they rallied round him and agreed to keep him not just as a councillor but as their Leader.

Such is political life today. Thank you Tory voters – for worse than nothing.

Ex-EDDC regeneration officer and Exeter City Council CEO gets award

“Exeter City Council’s dedication to supporting business and economy has resulted in its chief executive being named as one of the 2017 Faces of Growth.

Karime Hassan is one of seven people to appear on the list, compiled by accounting and consultancy firm Grant Thornton. …”

http://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/exeter-city-council-chief-executive-739798

Grant Thornton award. Former external auditor to East Devon and Exeter City Council until new EU regulations forced some councils to change auditors a couple of years ago.

Karime Hassan: he grew East Devon as regeneration chief, he’s growing Exeter as Chief Executive, he will grow Greater Exeter as its lead officer.

Aren’t we lucky …

“We want our Brexit cash boost – NHS boss”

“The health service should get the cash boost it was promised during the EU referendum, the head of the NHS in England is expected to say later.
Simon Stevens will use controversial claims used by Vote Leave to put the case for more money in a speech later.

With waiting times worsening, he will say trust in politics will be damaged if the NHS does not get more.

During the referendum it was claimed £350m a week was sent to the EU and that would be better spent on the NHS.

The claim was widely contested at the time and ever since – it did not take into account the rebate the UK had nor the fact the UK benefited from investment from the EU. Some argued it proved highly influential in the referendum result.

‘Honour the promises’

The speech by Mr Stevens at the NHS Providers’ annual conference of health managers is highly political, coming just a fortnight before the Budget.
And it is being made as three highly-influential health think-tanks – the King’s Fund, the Nuffield Trust and the Health Foundation – publish a joint report calling for an extra £4bn to be given to health next year. That amounts to eight times more than health spending is due to rise by.

Mr Stevens is not expected to say exactly how much he wants, but instead will argue the health service needs a significant boost in funding beyond what has already been promised by ministers.

He will tell delegates gathered in Birmingham: “The NHS wasn’t on the ballot paper, but it was on the Battle Bus. Vote Leave for a better funded health service – £350m a week.

“Rather than our criticising these clear Brexit funding commitments to NHS patients – promises entered into by cabinet ministers and by MPs – the public want to see them honoured.

“Trust in democratic politics will not be strengthened if anyone now tries to argue: ‘You voted Brexit, partly for a better funded health service. But precisely because of Brexit, you now can’t have one.’

“A modern NHS is itself part of the practical answer to the deep social concerns that gave rise to Brexit.

“At a time of national division, an NHS that brings us together. An institution that tops the list of what people say makes them proudest to be British. Ahead of the Army, the monarchy or the BBC. Unifying young and old, town and country, the struggling and the better off.”

Targets ‘being missed’

NHS Providers chief executive Chris Hopson has also given his backing to extra money. He pointed out key targets for A&E, routine operations and cancer care were now being widely missed.

“The Budget is an important opportunity, at the beginning of this Parliament, to protect care quality for patients and service users and help the NHS break out of the downward spiral in which it is currently trapped.
“There isn’t enough funding to cope.”

The government has promised the NHS frontline budget will be £8bn a year higher by 2022 – once inflation is taken into account – than it is now.
But that does not take into account the whole health budget – which also includes spending on things such as training and healthy lifestyle services, like stop smoking services.

Once that is factored in, the current average annual increase are running at less than 1%.

Historically, the service has enjoyed rises of around 4% to cover the cost of the ageing population and new drugs.

A Department of Health spokesman said: “Research shows spending on the NHS is in line with most other European countries, and the public can be reassured that the government is committed to continued investment in the health service.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-41908302

Developer offers small bribe to avoid building affordable homes which would increase profits by millions

The development: 300 homes in beautiful Gittisham, home of the latest very posh and very popular “Pig at ..” hotel chain.

The bribe: £400,000

The catch: Allow Baker Homes to cut their “affordable” properties from 120 to 90.

So, for the likely cost of ONE of their new homes, let them build 29 more of them and see 30 families lose out on cheaper (but not cheap) homes.

Let’s say each new home cosy a very conservative £300,000 x in fact the average cost is likely to be MUCH more than that. Affordable homes would have cost £240,000 (a 20% discount).

120 homes sold at £240,000 = £28,800,000
180 homes sold at £300,000 = £54,000,000
Total income from sales: £88,800,000

or

90 homes sold at £240,000 = £21,600,000
210 homes sold at £300,000 = £63,000,000
Total sales = £74,600,000
Less £400,000 paid to council
Total income from sales = £74,200,000

Total increase in sales = £14,400,000

and all for an outlay of £400,000

If the houses DO cost even more the profit will be even higher.

So, what’s it to be Honiton? A bit of cash or 30 families done out of homes they MIGHT be able to afford – at a pinch?

And now for good news: £2 parking all day in EDDC car parks for winter

“East Devon District Council has launched its five-month winter parking special offer.

From now until March 31 people can park all day for £2, regardless of what time they arrive.

It is a departure from the council’s usual policy of not starting the parking offer until 10am to avoid prime parks being blocked by commuters.

But this year officials wanted to be as generous as possible and say they are confident that the simple offer will work well.

The special offer tickets will be valid until midnight in all 41 EDDC pay and display car parks in Exmouth, Seaton, Sidmouth, Budleigh Salterton, Beer, Axminster, Honiton, Ottery St Mary, Lympstone and Colyton. But it does exclude Parkmobile payments and Permit Holders.

Customers should not be concerned if they notice that their ticket may not have an expiry time of midnight printed on it. Parking officers will be checking that the £2 has been paid, which will make the ticket valid for the rest of that day. …”

http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/east-devon-district-council-s-2-all-day-parking-offer-1-5269412

Is Swire after Pritti Patel’s job? Or any ministerial post with foreign travel?

Owl realised after reporting about Swire’s stinging criticism of Pritti Patel that it had missed the most blindingly obvious reason for his jibes about her. He desperately wants another crack at the Foreign Office!

Why? Well, here are a few possible reasons:

1. He supports Bojo, thinks they would make a great pair – and he might even think he could do his job if Bojo screws up much more.

2. He’s been terribly unhappy as a lowly constituency MP since he lost his foreign office bagman job and it would give him a terrific boost.

3. Many questions he asks in Parliament are about other countries, fewer about this country, hardly any about East Devon – so he would be in his comfort zone. Plus he could use his old excuse of not being able to speak about East Devon in Parliament because it would conflict with his bigger, better job.

4. He enjoys his £2000 per month job as Chairman of the Conservative Middle East Council – but not half as much as he would enjoy being at the FO.

5. He could visit his constituency even less often, using the excuse of having to jet-set.

6. He could spend more time in London doing things like supporting the Royal Marsden hospital.

7. He wouldn’t have to see or hear so much about Claire Wright.

8. He could keep out of the way of the East Devon Alliance.

9. He could keep out of the way of local protesters about austerity cuts (NHS, education, environment)

10. He would be far too busy to worry about over-development of expensive properties and under-provision of social housing in East Devon – and unable to comment on it anyway – see 3 above.

Is it on the cards? Well, anything is on the cards these days … though May having sacked him, she would likely have to be ousted first.

120,170 English children live in temporary accommodation

“It is an “abuse of human rights” that in the sixth richest economy thousands of people are living in “Dickensian conditions”, David Lammy has said.

An astonishing 78,180 households are living in temporary accommodation (TA), such as hostels and BnBs, and that means 120,170 children do not have a permanent home, MPs heard during a debate in Parliament on the “hidden” epidemic.

The Tottenham Labour MP hit out at the dearth of social homes in the country and voiced anger that a measly ten social homes were built in Grenfell-hit Kensington and Chelsea with council cash since 1990.

“Over the years, I have heard horror stories (about TA) of needles found in stairwells, of children sharing bathrooms with strangers, of vulnerable women being abused and exploited – and in the end this story comes back to a chronic problem of a decimation in our social housing,” he said.

A Local Government Association analysis found as much as £2m-a-day was being spent on TA by councils, amounting to around £2.6 billion in the past three years.

Siobhain McDonagh, Labour MP for Mitcham and Morden, who secured the debate, said: “Perhaps the most visible indication of the broken housing market is the thousands of people sleeping on our streets, but the homelessness crisis this country faces is far greater, and it is hidden.

He went on to say two families in his constituency had been living in TA for more than 10 years.

“Temporary accommodation is becoming permanent accommodation,” he said.

He hit out at the sale of social housing under the right-to-buy scheme and said just 1,102 social homes were built with government money in England since 2016, adding: “The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea – the borough that has been at the centre of the Grenfell storm – built just ten new council-funded social homes since 1990.”

One in ten households have been in TA for more than five years and for some families in the London boroughs of Harrow and Camden the period was as long as 19 years.

More than 28% of households in TA were housed outside their local authority area, an increase of 248% between March 2011 and March 2017.

Labour MP Frank Field branded the movement of families “worse than the Poor Law”.

He said: “In the Poor Law you were sent back to the village they thought you came from, under these rules you’re sent to any old village or city aren’t you, providing the local authority can actually dump families on them.”

Wes Streeting said youngsters in cramped TA in his constituency of Ilford North were experiencing mental health problems because of the conditions.

One mother lived in one room in a hostel with her 15-year-old daughter.

“Her daughter was preparing for her GCSEs but was having to revise for her exams and do her homework under the duvet with a torch at night,” he said. “It’s heartbreaking to see families live in those kinds of conditions.”

Streeting was also approached by an 11-year-old boy for help during a school visit, he said.

“I went to the head teacher’s office and I met with him,” he said. “The reason he wanted to see me, he said ‘you grew up in a council flat, didn’t you? Can you help me and my mum and my two brothers, because we currently live in one room in a hostel’.”

He added: “This country is going backwards not forwards, and it is simply intolerable.”

Bob Blackman, Tory MP for Harrow East, said many households struggle to scrape together a deposit for a rented property but that 32,000 families in England could benefit if the Government invests £31 million a year into a project to help.

He said such a scheme could save the temporary accommodation budget £1.8 billion over three years.

Housing Minister Marcus Jones said the Government was making progress on getting people out of TA but was “not complacent” and had set up a homelessness reduction task force to tackle the issue.

“The quality of TA is of course extremely important,” he said, saying councils had a legal duty to provide good housing.

“We are committed to ending rough sleeping and reducing homelessness overall and we are therefore setting up a homelessness reduction task force,” he added.

In October, Theresa May announced a £2bn pot of grant money to build affordable housing, stating councils and housing associations can bid for the cash to build, and in areas with high rent, the homes can be social rent, rather than “affordable” rents, which can be up to 80% of market rent.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/david-lammy-dickensian_uk_5a01de30e4b066c2c03a73d7

Direct v. indirect investments in offshore trusts – 50 shades of grey?

“Downing Street confirmed yesterday that the prime minister did not have any direct offshore investments and that her assets were held in a blind trust, which is regarded as customary practice for ministers.”

Er, sorry, no “direct” offshore investments?

So, she has “indirect” offshore investments then?

Do companies her blind trust invests in have direct or indirect offshore holdings?

More questions than answers!

Swire says MPs should be transparent about lobbying – where to start!

Do you see what he is doing here?

Deflecting people away from the Paradise Papers. And Ms Patel wanting to offer international aid to Israeli soldiers. And Boris Johnson opening his big rather stupid mouth and endangering a Brit’s wife imprisoned in Iran. And sex scandals galore in the Houses of Parliament

Like Trump going on about “crooked Hillary” when his Russian links or tax documents are mentioned Swire looks for a diversion where a Tory government will NEVER change its policy of not just welcoming lobbying but actively encouraging it.

Remember (way back) when Swire was Foreign Office flunky and Cameron arranged for big businesses to be palled up with MPs?

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2015/02/25/the-tory-access-for-influence-buddy-system-that-pairs-high-ranking-mps-including-our-own-hugo-swire-with-multinational-corporation-executives/

On lobbying, can we perhaps now look forward to Mr Swire and all MPs publishing their diaries and list all schmoozing appointments (and who they sat with!) for the last 5 years to see which lobbyists they have met?

BUT ALSO:

Can we force all MPs to sign declarations that they have no offshore funds? (Nothing at all to do with lobbying but Owl refuses to be deflected!).

Owl thinks he doth protest too much!

“Conservative MP for East Devon, Hugo Swire, says MPs should “open their books” and be “entirely transparent” about lobbying.

The former foreign minister told the House of Commons that the spotlight was on Parliament and it was finally time to “address the issue of access, privileged access and lobbying and funding if we are not to have this repeated time and time again”.

Mr Swire was speaking following an urgent question on private meetings held with International Development Secretary Priti Patel, whilst she was on holiday in Israel.”

“NHS cannot continue ‘in red zone’, providers’ leader warns”

“Hospitals in England are spending £900 less per person than Germany, an expert has warned.

Chris Hopson, chief executive of NHS Providers, a trade association that represents acute, ambulance, community and mental health services, said the argument for additional funding for the health service was clear as he warned that it could not continue to operate in the “red zone”.

He said UK health spending needed to be about 13% higher to match German or French levels.

Figures from the Office for National Statistics show that the UK spent £2,777 per person on healthcare in 2014.

Speaking at the NHS Providers conference in Birmingham, Hopson described the effects of the NHS being in the middle of the “longest and deepest” financial squeeze in its history.

He pointed out that last year, the NHS in England had missed all four major targets – the four-hour A&E standard, the 18-week elective surgery waiting time standard, the expectation that cancer patients would begin treatment within 62 days and the ambulance response time target.

Hopson added that the NHS could no longer meet performance standards on current funding levels. He also warned that the health service was “slipping back” on improvements made throughout the 2000s.

“The simple point is that if we want the best care, we have to pay for it. UK health spending would need to be around £24bn, or 13% higher, to match current German or French levels of health spending,” Hopson said.

“If we wanted to spend as much per head of population as the French do, we’d need to be spending £300 a year more per person. To match the Germans, we’d need to be spending £900 a year more per person. Sobering figures which show that, in the end, as my Dad used to say, you get what you pay for.”

Hopson added: “We are now trying to run the NHS above its sustainable limits, well into the red zone … and [there is] a growing, tangible frustration that the hard-fought gains of the 2000s across a range of measures – for example, waiting times and single-sex wards – are starting to slip back at increasing pace.”

He said the NHS budget and staff numbers were growing, but they were not keeping up with demand and to meet performance standards.”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/nov/07/nhs-cannot-continue-in-red-zone-providers-leader-warns?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

‘Paradise Papers: Theresa May refuses to promise register of offshore trusts’

Offshore investing allows companies to avoid paying tax in the UK and is not illegal. Theresa May says she does not intend to change this so that it becomes tax evasion, which is illegal.

One can only assume that her investment banker husband has given her his professional advice.

Though:

“After his wife Theresa May, now the British Prime Minister, emerged as the only remaining candidate for the Conservative party leadership, his employer issued a statement saying that his current job does not make him responsible for investment decisions: “he is not involved with, and doesn’t manage, money and is not a portfolio manager. His job is to ensure the clients are happy with the service and that we understand their goals.”
(Wiki)

“Their goals”, right …

Guardian :

“Theresa May has refused to commit to a public register of the ownership of offshore companies and trusts in the wake of the Paradise Papers revelations but said new measures were already creating more transparency. …
… Corbyn called for a full public inquiry into tax avoidance and evasion, as well as a new tax enforcement unit at HMRC.

“Please understand the public anger and consternation at the scale of tax avoidance revealed yet again today,” he told the annual gathering of business leaders. “We are talking about tens of billions that are effectively being leached from our vital public services by a super-rich elite that holds the taxation system and the rest of us in contempt.

“We must take action now to put an end to this socially damaging and extortionately costly scandal.”

Public spending jeopardised by Brexit uncertainty

“Philip Hammond, the chancellor, has been warned by Whitehall’s spending watchdog that continuing uncertainty over Brexit could jeopardise the public finances.

In a report released on Tuesday, the National Audit Office (NAO) says high levels of government borrowing since the financial crash meant there are already significant risks to the UK’s finances.

Sir Amyas Morse, the head of the NAO, said these risks could be exacerbated by “unexpected developments”, including any unforeseen consequences of leaving the European Union.

Auditors said that borrowing had increased since 2009-10 by 61%, while interest payments on the UK’s debts had cost the government £222bn. Over the same period, managing the public finances had become more difficult since the global financial crash of 2008.

The NAO pointed to an increase in the use of index-linked gilts to finance the government’s debts which meant a rise of just 1% in retail price inflation could add £26bn in interest costs between 2016-17 and 2020-21.

The latest warning comes after the trusted Institute for Fiscal Studies warned last week that Hammond could be forced to abandon his target of eliminating the deficit by the mid 2020s when he delivers the budget on 22 November.

Morse said uncertainty over Brexit, as well as the eventual unwinding of the Bank of England’s programme of “quantitative easing”, meant it was essential the Treasury kept the risks under constant review.

“Put simply, public and private borrowing are high, kept affordable by record low interest rates, and quantitative easing continues 10 years after the crisis it responded to,” Morse said.

“There are significant risks to the public finances and any unexpected developments, potentially including consequences of leaving the EU could exacerbate them. In these circumstances, the Treasury needs to constantly monitor these risks and be ready to react quickly and flexibly. It has taken steps to increase its capacity to respond. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/nov/07/brexit-uncertainty-is-jeopardising-public-finances-watchdog-warns

‘Ladram Bay to hold public meeting over Otterton traffic issues’

“A public meeting is being held in Otterton to allow residents to raise any concerns they have over the flow of traffic through the village.

Following a meeting with holiday park Ladram Bay earlier this year, which was attended by county councillor Claire Wright as well as Otterton parish councillors, a public gathering has been scheduled for Wednesday (November 8).

Writing in her blog, cllr Wright said Ladram Bay director Zoe House has offered to hold the meeting at the holiday park at 7.30pm.

She added: “It was impressed upon the Ladram Bay staff, who will first give a presentation about their business, the main reason for holding such a meeting is for local residents to ask questions.

“I am told that this has been accepted and taken on board.”

There will be a Ladram Bay minibus, seating between eight and 10 people, outside the King’s Arms at 7pm, for those people who are unable to make the trip on their own.”

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/ladram-bay-holding-public-meeting-otterton-traffic-1-5263057

‘A&E unit for elderly to tackle waiting times and bed blocking’

“The Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital is to open Britain’s first A&E unit for elderly people in an attempt to avoid them becoming stranded on wards.

It will ask all patients over the age of 80 to go to a separate unit, next to the existing A&E, staffed by geriatrics specialists. …”

Times (paywall)

Of course, they could have gone to specialist community hospitals to take the pressure off A and E – of we still had enough of them.

NHS staff ‘working on the edge of safety’

Who do YOU believe?

“NHS staff in England are working on the “edge of safety” as rising demand is outstripping the increasing numbers being employed, health bosses say.
There are now 6% more staff than there were three years ago, but demand for services has risen by three times as much in some areas.

NHS Providers, which represents health chiefs, said staff shortages was now the number one concern in the NHS.

But ministers insisted there were plans in place to tackle the problem.

Over the past year, Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt has announced rises in the number of training places for both doctors and nurses.

The Department of Health said this represented the “biggest ever expansion of training places” and would help ensure the NHS had the staff it needed. …”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-41892336

Jeremy Corbyn on green belt development

“I feel very strongly about the principle of the green belt, because if you take away this cordon of green space and cleaner air around big cities, I think you have the danger of massive ribbon development. So I am somebody that is very sceptical about building on the green belt. I see that in some cases there are land swaps that go on, where a piece of open space is created somewhere else in return for it. That obviously is a trade off that can be looked at.

But I just think as a society we all need a bit of open space around us. We all value our parks. You don’t go to them every day, but it’s good for you to know they are there and good for everybody else if they want to go and use them. So I am concerned about encroaching on the green belt.”

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2017/nov/06/cbi-tells-may-that-business-needs-clarity-over-brexit-transition-by-christmas-politics-live

Another CCG judicial review request – but not in Devon

“Campaigners have applied to the High Court for judicial review over Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust plans to shake up services.
The Hands Off HRI campaign, advised by law firm Irwin Mitchell, is seeking to challenge the NHS Trust’s plans to axe the A&E department at Huddersfield Royal Infirmary (HRI) and replacing the 400-bed hospital with a 64-bed “planned care” facility.

It said the plans would also see a transfer of capacity to Calderdale Royal Hospital (CRH) in Halifax, which would be expanded to have 674 beds.
The group claimed that the costs of the plans were estimated at being more than £300m, proposed to be funded by a Private Finance Initiative.

Yogi Amin, a partner at Irwin Mitchell and the lawyer representing the Hands Off HRI campaign, said: “We believe that the Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust has produced a flawed business case, which does not present all the necessary evidence or follow the government guidelines.

“The effect of seeing through these plans could not only be millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money being used, but also the closure of much needed acute local NHS services. Local campaigners and professionals have argued that alternative local options based on the use of existing resources should have been considered as opposed to the current proposed plan which would see hundreds of patients every month transported from the Huddersfield facility to CRH in Halifax.”

A spokesman from Hands Off HRI campaign group said: “This is a long and complicated road that we are taking to challenge the proposed changes to take away our much needed local hospital services in Huddersfield.

“We support the judicial review and we believe that the Court will consider the case fairly. In the meantime we hope that no steps are taken to make any changes to the hospital services.

“The NHS Trust plans are opposed by local people and have yet to receive any funding or full backing from the government, so we do not think that it would be fair to go ahead and move hospital services from Huddersfield to the CRH in Halifax.”

The NHS trust has been approached for comment.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php