Academy schools and the potential for corruption

” … in a meeting between union officials and Blue Support executives shortly after the letter arrived [about the award of a cleaning contract for an academy school], a diligent, if overworked, Unison official admitted to being puzzled. Sitting with her back to the window in one of the new-build school’s soulless rooms, Hazel Corby wondered why the lucky company had the same Stockport address as Bright Tribe’s headquarters. She asked how the company had been so swiftly selected after Bright Tribe’s takeover? Who else had a chance to bid for the contract?

‘Joining a multi-academy trust is like marriage without divorce’

The school’s principal didn’t know. An answer wasn’t forthcoming from those representing the company that afternoon, or in the days to come. Bright Tribe later said the question was irrelevant as the contract with Blue Support was made on an interim basis.

But an exchange of business cards between Corby and Blue Support’s human resources manager, Sally Jarvis, gave rather more away. “Sally’s card said Equity Solutions on it,” said Corby.

ES Management Services – where the ES stands for Equity Solutions – is the parent company of Blue Support, of which Dwan’s brother, Andrew, is managing director. Equity Solutions is also Mike Dwan’s main business interest, among 90 other companies of which he is, or has been, a director.

Bright Tribe insists that it has always been transparent about its commercial partners. But, for Corby, Jarvis’s business card was a loose thread that, once pulled, unravelled what she felt was a worrying complex of interconnected commercial and charitable interests.

Here was a financier who had quietly moved into sponsoring academies and with ostensibly philanthropic ambitions. Dwan’s spokesman said that he had donated £3.5m “directly or indirectly” to his academy empire, which included 11 failing schools desperately in need of his resources. The spokesman added that, while Dwan is aware “some will seek to find some ulterior motive for his actions”, he is “involved in the provision of school improvement services for a sole single purpose, to promote better outcomes for our children”.

Yet in 2013-14 alone, it was to emerge, there were nearly £1m worth of payments not recorded in the publicly available accounts by Dwan’s academies to his own private businesses. In 2014-15 another £1.9m in such payments, known as “related party transactions”, were made, albeit this time reported in publicly available accounts following pressure from government regulators.”

http://gu.com/p/4kqm2

Councils must follow through on planning enforcement says Local Government Ombudsman

” … Councils and other planning authorities need to act more decisively when taking enforcement action against planning breaches in order to maintain control of the built environment, the local government ombudsman has said.

Publishing a report examining a case where a man complained that Hackney Council spent more than five years trying unsuccessfully to get his neighbour to remove an unauthorised extension, Jane Martin said all authorities must ensure effective enforcement measures are taken.

Planning authorities must keep track of enforcement action, and follow through when they promise to act in order for the system to function, she stated.

The report highlighted problems that can occur when councils do not take decisive enforcement action or keep neighbours up-to-date on progress. …

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/06/ombudsman-urges-councils-take-firm-action-planning-breaches

North Somerset council overwhelmingly rejects devolution deal

“One of Bristol’s neighbouring councils has given a resounding thumbs-down to a devolution deal which could see £1 billion of Government funding pumped into the Bristol region.

At an extraordinary meeting held tonight, North Somerset councillors voted overwhelmingly against the devolution deal which would see the four local authorities – Bristol, South Gloucestershire, North Somerset and Bath and North East Somerset, come together as a combined authority under an elected ‘Metro Mayor.’

North Somerset leaders had previously said they were against the deal, arguing the new money would do nothing for the area.

They fear Government funding allocated to the region as part of the devolution deal would be sucked away by Bristol, leaving the area they represent, which includes Portishead, Clevedon and Weston-super-Mare, as the poor relation.

Council leader Nigel Ashton said a combined authority and elected mayor was ‘unwanted’ and ‘unnecessary.’

Mr Ashton said: “North Somerset, South Gloucestershire and Bath & North Somerset are some of the best performing councils in the country.

“I wonder why anyone would want to get rid of them?

“We have an excellent relationship with our councils and this will continue.

“Local residents are overwhelmingly against a centralised mayor. Eighty five per cent of responses from residents and town and parish councils were against the devolution proposal.

“People do not want another level of government which could lead to North Somerset becoming a poor relation to Bristol.

“It didn’t work when it was Avon, Now it would be worse

” I love Bristol but it has different priorities to North Somerset.

“If the deal goes through there are no guarantees that North Somerset will get any significant money.

“All future power and resources will be devolved to an elected mayor.”

Councillors said that North Somerset already had excellent relationships with other councils and local businesses.

Many said that if the current arrangements were not broken, why fix them.

http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/North-Somerset-Council-rejects-devolution-deal/story-29372319-detail/story.html

USA pulls big Chinese partnership deal over “performance issues”

What price Hinkley C if the USA pulls out of a big deal with China:

“A [billions of dollars] high-speed railway project that was seen as a landmark deal in China’s export of advanced ­technology to the United States has fallen apart over performance and American regulatory issues.”

http://uk.businessinsider.com/us-china-partnership-ended-on-nevada-xpresswest-rail-project-2016-6?amp?r=US&IR=T

China wanted the rolling stock to be manufactured in China ( one wonders how things got so far before this crucial point was introduced) and a Chinese spokesperson said:

“It will be more effective if China just exports its equipment to other nations,” said Zhao Jian, a professor at Beijing Jiaotong University. “But China should avoid giving out massive loans and gaining operating rights for such projects. Many nations consider railway operation as a sovereignty issue, and it’s not easy for China to get involved.

“Such projects are costly, and not many nations have a sufficient population to generate profits. The demand is not enough to ensure long-term viability.”

Does this apply to Hinkley C, Owl wonders?

If Plymouth has to say how much it sold its former HQ for, why is EDDC keeping us in the dark?

“The Civic Centre in Plymouth was sold to developers Urban Splash for £1, it has emerged.

Plymouth City Council confirmed that it received payment of £1 for the sale of the 14-storey local authority headquarters in the city centre. …

… The city council provided the £1 figure to David Every after a Freedom of Information inquiry. The council initially withheld the information, but finally reversed that decision this week.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Plymouth-s-Civic-Centre-sold-1/story-29385867-detail/story.html

How did business-park on-a-Sidford -floodplain come to be in the Local Plan?

From the good old days of the much-lamented Sidmouth Independent News on 25 July 2015:

“Cllr Graham Troman (Sidmouth) claimed there was “no justification” for an out-of-town business park which would damage the vibrancy of Sidmouth town centre. He was shocked by the dubious way in which this proposal had been inserted in the Local Plan without any proper discussion.

Cllr Christine Drew (Sidmouth) said that EDDC had ignored overwhelming public opposition to the site, and she was very suspicious of the recent “minor amendment” to add retail to the type of businesses proposed.

Stuart Hughes argued that adequate employment land could be provided for Sidmouth by realising the potential of the Alexandria Road site, and new access could be provided for half the cost of the £1 million pounds estimated by EDDC planners. And funding might be available for this from a variety of sources.

He also highlighted the acute flood risk at the Sidford site which was on a flood plain. The Council’s argument that the problem could be solved by a SUDS system was weak: a similar system at Woolbrook failed during recent flooding. He feared the impact that building at Sidford would have on flooding downstream.

As county councillor responsible for roads, he stressed the inadequacy of the main road which would serve the site which was subject to regular flooding.

Cllr Mike Allen (Honiton), former chair of the Local Plan Panel made a swingeing attack on the Sidford allocation.

It was “not compliant” with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) which gave “great weight” to the protection of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

There was no evidence that it was needed by Sidmouth. It would require people to commute into the town to work. It was “against the public interest”.

He was also suspicious of how the Built Up Area Boundary had been extended to the north of Sidford by officers without consultation.

It would be straightforward to remove the Sidford allocation from the Local Plan: failure to do so would risk the rejection of the whole plan by the Inspector. He seconded Cllr Troman’s motion that it should be deleted.

Chief Executive Mark Williams then advised that this would not be possible legally as it was not a minor amendment.

This provoked an extraordinary attack on Mr Williams by Cllr Allen. His advice was a “biased” view which showed ignorance of the NPPF. He did not have a “grip” on the legal situation, and had not taken account of all the legal considerations.

Tory Whip, Phil Twiss, jumped up to defend the CEO who must be right “because he is a solicitor” and Cllr Allen wasn’t!

Allen, who, in his day job is the Officer Responsible for Regeneration at South Somerset District Council, calmly replied that he had a considerable legal authority on his side – the NPPF.

A rather shell-shocked Council then proceeded to vote on the motion to delete Sidford. It was rejected.

The Tory majority – immune to argument- went on to approve all the “minor amendments” to the Local Plan which approves the Knowle and Sidford proposals.”

https://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2013/07/25/knowle-housing-and-sidford-site-stay-in-local-plan-as-ceo-savaged/

Hernandez smoked cannabis but says it shouldn’t be legal!

The Katie Hopkins of the Police and Crime Commissioner world!

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Plymouth-crime-chief-says-smoked-cannabis-shouldn/story-29384722-detail/story.html

The “No Party Party”

Perhaps an unfortunate choice of name but still supporting independents:

Independence in Democracy Interview: Danny Bamping

The movement is DEFINITELY growing – REAL localism in action!

Two more Independent groups in the south-west

Plymouth Independents:

A group of independently minded people who have their own individual ideas, attitudes
and personalities.

“The object of the Party is to have a central point for the “Lone Voices” who regularly stand in local elections to gather, get advice and plan strategies for PLYMOUTH.

We want ORDINARY people to join us and get involved with local Democracy, we are not being told what to do by some remote CENTRAL OFFICE, our Central Office is the City and its residents.

Not all of us will agree, not all of us will even get on! But, and it’s a big but, we will ALL work for the City.”

http://www.pisw.uk/

and

North Somerset First Independents

“We believe that the current administration within North Somerset Council is not democratic or transparent due to its majority stronghold. We want to break down this stronghold to make it a fairer and more balanced democratic council. We aim to reinvigorate local politics and believe localism is the key to this. But above all we want to renew your trust within local politics.”

http://www.northsomersetfirstindependents.org.uk/FAQs

Who “owns” Seaton Heights?

Lyme Bay Leisure Ltd is usually quoted as the owner of the property and has a (somewhat optimistic) website where it is currently advertising “off plan” opportunities to purchase units for a £1,000 deposit:

http://lymebayleisure.co.uk/seaton-heights/

However, there are four charges outstanding on the site, the two most recent on 17 and 23 May 2016 to Simon Oliver Developments Ltd (debentures) and two earlier ones (also debentures)to Stonesby House Developers Ltd:

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08513325/charges

No details are given of the extent of the charges involved.

“MPs criticise government over flood protection plans”

Of interest to those in Sidford, who are being let down by flood protection by inappropriate development.

… “Labour MP Ms Creagh said: “We know that flooding is projected to get worse and occur more frequently because of climate change, so it just isn’t good enough for government to react to flooding events as they occur.

“Communities at risk deserve certainty from government.”
The committee found that funding for flooding fluctuates year-on-year. Funding was initially cut during the last parliament and only increased after the winter floods of 2013-14.

The government has committed to spending £2.3bn on building new defences and to protect spending on maintaining existing defences – but the EAC warned they were “sceptical” the government would reach its target of protecting 300,000 properties, saying it was based on an optimistic forecast that assumed the greatest efficiency in spending decisions.
The committee also said it was surprised to learn the extra £700m funding for flood defences announced in this year’s Budget was based on a “political calculation” and may not be allocated with the same strict economic criteria as the £2.3bn.

The report said that could lead to inefficiencies in flood investments, poor decision-making and outcomes that were potentially unfair to some regions. …

… The condition of critical flood defences is in decline, according to the committee.

Ms Creagh said: “The government needs to put money into the upkeep of existing flood defences as well as investing in new defences. Failure to do so can have terrible consequences for residents and businesses when defences fail.

“Any decline in the condition of critical flood defences represents an unacceptable risk to local communities in flood prone areas. We urge the government to go beyond its current target and aim to have virtually all its critical assets meeting the Environment Agency’s required condition by 2019.”

The committee said it was concerned the government does not know how prepared local authorities are for flooding, with Ms Creagh adding that local authorities “are not receiving the support they need to prepare for, and mitigate, the impacts of flooding”.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36480213

Voting deadline extended to midnight Thursday

The deadline for registering to vote in the EU referendum has been extended, the government has said.

https://www.gov.uk/register-to-vote

Cabinet Office minister Matt Hancock said the government would legislate to extend the cut-off until midnight on Thursday.

It follows a computer glitch which left some people unable to sign up before the original midnight Tuesday deadline.

The Electoral Commission urged people to sign up until the end of Thursday in order to vote on 23 June.

PLEASE do not leave it till the last-minute – do it NOW! With your national insurance number to hand (it is usually on payslips) it will take less than five minutes.

EVERY VOTE WILL COUNT IT IS SO CLOSE.

Moirai Capital Investments: a two-man band, or perhaps just one – and very strange coincidence!

MOIRAI CAPITAL INVESTMENTS

“Cash: £34,200
Net worth £2 million
Assets £123,400
Liabilities £1.2 million

Director: Nicholas David Lewis – 18 other directorships (8 active, 10 closed)
Director: Sarju (aka Bobby) Rach – 14 other directorships (6 active, 8 closed)”

https://companycheck.co.uk/company/07097957/MOIRAI-CAPITAL-INVESTMENTS-LIMITED/summary

Mr Rach describes himself as formerly of Moirai Capital Investments on Linkedin, saying he left in October 2010 and now saya he is now a “WHOLE OF MARKET INDEPENDENT MORTGAGE AND INSURANCE BROKER” at Mortgage Force London

“2010 – Present (6 years)
Whole of market mortgage broker offering competitive mortgage and insurance products.
Dealing with all the major mortgage lenders to achieve a successful outcome with a sympathetic and personal service
.”

“Property Development
Moirai Capital Investments Ltd
2008 – October 2010 (2 years)
Part of the acquisitions team. Buying, developing and selling of investment properties
.”

But maybe you can still be a director without working for the company – a sleeping partner, perhaps?

https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarjurach

It’s not a lot of money available to develop a big site like Exmouth Splash when Moirai is already having long-term problems with their investment in Swindon …

http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/14489657.Fears_over_North_Star_development_company_accounts__without_foundation_/

Other companies the directors run seem to be on a bit of a financial shoestring but Owl understands little (actually, nothing) about high finance and would be happy to stand corrected if misunderstanding the figures.

https://companycheck.co.uk/director/917062553/NICHOLAS-DAVID-LEWIS/financials

https://companycheck.co.uk/director/911112231/SARJU–RACH/financials

If anyone from Moirai would like to correct the above with suitable evidence, Owl will be happy to publish it.

Oh dear, and we now find in one of those one in a trillion coincidences that a Mr Sadhu Rach, with the same birth month and birth year trades/has traded on the internet and sells/has sold these:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Twitfish-Rubber-Fake-Boobs-Bust-Tits-Breasts-Stag-Night-Joke-Novelty-Gift-/151527010896

and the company is about to be struck off (see comment on this post).

Hugo Swire – you don’t have to be smart to be a minister, just in a safe seat

Interesting how many old-Etonians were parachuted into safe seats, including our own Hugo Swire. But it isn’t looking quite so safe at the moment. What on EARTH would Swire DO if he was just a constituency MP (or possibly not an MP at all). No wonder he rants at Independents – more of a threat now than ever before!

“Voters elect their members of parliament (MPs) in general elections, but a large majority of MPs have very little to do with the day-to-day governing of the country. It is rather the ministers in government, as selected by the victorious party leaders, who do. Hence there is an obvious link between the general elections and government formation with regard to who selects ministers.

In a recent study with Elad Klein, we show that there is another—albeit a less obvious—connection in terms of who gets selected as ministers; MPs in electorally safe seats are more likely to become ministers.

This is based on an analysis whether the constituency results from the elections to the House of Commons over the period 1992–2015 influenced the likelihood of MPs being selected as ministers in the United Kingdom (UK).

The House of Commons provides the perfect case to assess the electoral connection of ministerial selection due to the single-member districts, large government size, and the relatively decentralised candidate selection process in the UK.

Electoral safety affects the ministerial selection because elections are a constraint over the preferences of MPs and their parties. MPs need to stay in the parliament by being re-elected to be able to pursue other goals, including attaining promotion to government ranks. On the other hand, party leaders need to maximise the number of their MPs in order to stay in the government to achieve their policy ideals.

Electoral constraints differ with the marginality of seats for each MP in Westminster systems. In single-member districts, it is comparatively clear to members and to their leaders how electorally safe their parliamentary seats are.

As the electoral marginality of a seat increases, or in other words as the number of votes separating success from failure to secure a seat decreases, re-election becomes the dominant motivation.

Our results show that there is indeed a positive relationship between MPs electoral safety and their probability of securing a ministerial office. …

… For an MP with 5% electoral safety, which is often considered as marginal, the probability of becoming a minister is one in 10. In contrast, a 35% majority more than doubles this probability for MPs.

http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=22300

Tesco Plaza, Seaton?

Pages 16 and 17 of the Midweek Herald today is a 2-page spread on the Seaton Cycling Festival on 19 June 2016, with some events described as taking place at “Thury-Harcourt/Tesco Plaza:

image

Is this Thury-Harcourt PLACE (Thury-Harcourt being Seaton’s twin town in France) and somewhere outside the Tesco Store (though where the Plaza is is anyone’s guess) or is there an insidious attempt to claim Thury-Harcourt Place as a Tesco advertising site?

Axminster “Regeneration” Board

So, it now exists …. with senior members of the Conservative majority holding the reins …. the same members that let it get into a position where it needs a regeneration board …. headed by someone who already has two other day jobs.

And they boast of how the have regenerated Seaton and Exmouth …. anyone been to Seaton recently? Where a former mayor has just resigned because he says too much attention is being paid to “Seaton Jurassic” and the Tesco site and not enough attention is being paid to the dying former town centre or other concerns. And where Seaton Heights still sits derelict whilst its owners make fantastic claims about what might happen but show no signs of them ever coming to fruition.

And Exmouth – where “regeneration” has become a dirty word amongst most residents and where EDDC’s chosen partner appears to be floundering with other developments it is involved in – not to mention being unable to file company their accounts on time.

Good luck Axminster.

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/axminster_is_the_next_regeneration_town_1_4566363

Royal Navy destroyers won’t work in warm water!

“The Royal Navy’s fleet of six £1bn destroyers is breaking down because the ships’ engines cannot cope with the warm waters of the Gulf, defence chiefs have admitted.

They also told the Commons defence committee on Tuesday that the Type 45 destroyers’ Rolls-Royce WR-21 gas turbines are unable to operate in extreme temperatures and will be fitted with diesel generators.

Rolls-Royce executives said engines installed in the Type 45 destroyers had been built as specified – but that the conditions in the Middle East were not “in line with these specs”. …

http://gu.com/p/4kjgz

Sidmouth Neighbourhood Plan consultations

Throughout June and July in various locations, details here:

https://www.visionforsidmouth.org/calendar/2016/june/sidmouth-neighbourhood-plan-hits-the-road.aspx

Conservative devolution Mayoral candidate resigns from Conservative Party to run as Independent

Hot on the heels of former Devon and Cornwall Police and Crime Commissioner Tony Hogg resigning from the Tory Party comes this spectacular defection.

Mr Swire – read and learn.

North East mayoral hopeful Jeremy Middleton has quit the “Conservative Party after becoming disillusioned with political point scoring in regional politics, he has said.

In a shock move, the former parliamentary candidate and former chairman of the Conservative National Convention has turned his back on the party after 30 years and said he wants to put the interests of the region first as he stands as an independent candidate.

North East mayoral hopeful Jeremy Middleton has quit the Conservative Party after becoming disillusioned with political point scoring in regional politics, he has said.

In a shock move, the former parliamentary candidate and former chairman of the Conservative National Convention has turned his back on the party after 30 years and said he wants to put the interests of the region first as he stands as an independent candidate.

Mr Middleton said: “This is not about party politics, it is about the North East. This region needs candidates focused exclusively on its interests and not people with one eye on their party careers.”

The businessman, who was awarded a CBE in 2012 for services to politics and charities, said the London Mayoral race and Andy Burnham’s announcement as Labour’s candidate for the North West showed the regional elections are being taken over by Westminster.

“I am disillusioned with Westminster squabbles,” he said. “It is clear the big parties will use these elections as platforms to fight national battles and internal arguments, but we need to put the people’s interests first.

“We need to end the factionalism and childish Westminster arguments that dominate our local politics.”

The North East has had a “raw deal” from successive governments for decades, Mr Middleton added.

“The political leaders in the North East have let the region down, the North East needs better leadership.

“Councillors have had to be dragged kicking and screaming to make a devolution deal, while Manchester has become a great success story.”

Mr Middleton also accused local councils in the North East of “empire building” and failing to put the needs of the area first.

He said: “Labour assume they will have a meeting and pick a mayoral candidate who will back their little empire and local leadership.”

The former Tory said the problems with the Labour leadership in the North East have not manifested themselves with the Labour party in Greater Manchester.

“The difference between the North East and the North West is that political leaders in the North West have realised they can do business with the exchequer,” he said.

“They have gone to the Chancellor with a plan on how to grow the economy and become self-sustained, an offer he couldn’t refuse. The North East has just gone to the Government with their hands out and asked how much money can we get?”

After a failed bid to become a Tory MP in the 2004 Hartlepool by-election, Mr Middleton said he wouldn’t have considered running for office again – until the regional Mayor role became a reality.

He said: “Do I think I can win it? I believe I can win it.

“My time will be spent fixing the problems our region faces not arguing with other politicians. People have told me they don’t believe that any party politician in the North East can or will deliver that.”

http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/north-east-mayoral-hopeful-jeremy-11423859